14 2024-011813 LM - 2024-011813 LM (1909 Comal Street); District 11 of 12 ARMBRUST & BROWN, PLLC A T T O R N E Y S A N D C O U N S E L O R S 100 CONGRESS AVENUE, SUITE 1300 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2744 512-435-2300 FACSIMILE 512-435-2360 Andrew Linseisen (512) 435-2358 alinseisen@abaustin.com Mr. Joseph Fotinos Land Management Division Transportation and Public Works City of Austin 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, Texas 78752 April 9, 2024 Re: Request for Alley Vacation for property located between E. 20th Street and E. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, and between Comal and Leona Streets, Austin, Texas 78722, also known as TCAD Parcel No.’s 0211071501, 0211071502, 0211071503, 0211071504, 0211071505, 0211071506, and 0211071507 (“Tract 1”); 0211071508, 0211071509, 0211071510, 0211071511, 0211071601, 0211071512, and 0211071515 (“Tract 2”); 0211071608, 0211071602, 0211071607, 0211071603, 0211071609, 0211071610 and 0211071611 (“Tract 3”) (collectively the “Property”) Dear Mr. Fotinos: Please accept this as an amended Alley Vacation Application for the above referenced Property (the “Application”). This Application is submitted to request approval of the vacation of the alley while retaining existing easements to the City to accommodate the existing infrastructure that exists in the alley. As part of the future development of the surrounding properties, the University of Texas *”UT”) plans to relocate the existing utility infrastructure and following the relocations may request release of the retained easements to allow future development on and over the alley The following information is being provided to detail the reasons for the alley vacation. 1. Is this a residential or commercial project? The lots adjacent to the alley subject to the Application are owned by UT. Subject to the approval of the Application, and the UT Board of Regents, the property owned by the University of Texas is proposed for redevelopment as Graduate Student Housing. 2. How was the area to be vacated dedicated? By plat or by separate instrument? The alleyway was dedicated by plat. Copies of the plats are included with this Application. 14 2024-011813 LM - 2024-011813 LM (1909 Comal Street); District 12 of 12 ARMBRUST & BROWN, PLLC Page 2 3. Did the City purchase the area to be vacated? (i.e., by Street Deed)? No, the City of Austin did not purchase the area. 4. Are both the area to be vacated and your property in the same “subdivision”? No, but per email from Joseph Fotinos dated February 9, 2024, …
To: From: MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Christopher Bueckert, Real Estate Services Agent, Austin Transportation and Public Works Date: March 5, 2026 Subject: F# 2024-011813 LM Alley Right-of-Way Vacation of approximately 0.2399- acre tract of land abutting 1909 Comal Street Attached is the Application Packet and Master Comment Report pertaining to the alley right-of-way vacation application for an approximately 0.2399-acre portion of land, being the unpaved/undeveloped right-of-way abutting 1909 Comal Street, as shown on C.R. Johns and Co. Subdivision (20’ alley and an alley of variable width out of Block 2, of Outlot 45, Division B of the C.R. Johns and Co. Subdivision of Outlot No’s 57, 36, 37, and 46, Division B, a Subdivision recorded in Volume 1, Page 3, Plat Records of Travis County, Texas). The proposed vacation tract will be added to the abutting parcels. The abutting properties are owned by Board of Regents of the University of Texas System. Per the transmittal letter dated April 9, 2024, received by the City of Austin, the applicant states, “How do you plan to develop the area to be vacated? Response: …will be redeveloped as Graduate Student Housing supporting the students of the University of Texas in Austin.” All affected departments and private utility franchise stakeholders have reviewed the application and recommend approval, subject to the reviewers’ conditions shown on the attached Master Comment Report. Per City Code §14-11-71 – Notice to Interested Property Owners Public notice will be sent to owners within 300’ of the area to be vacated. The director of Austin Public Works may approve the application after the 10th day that the notice is issued; and an affected property owner may submit comments regarding the proposed vacation. Public Notice was sent to appropriate parties on January 21, 2026. No objections have been received by staff as of the date of this memorandum. The applicant has requested that this item be submitted for placement on the April 14, 2026, Planning Commission agenda. Staff contact: Christopher Bueckert, Real Estate Services agent Austin Transportation and Public Works, 512-974-1780, landmanagementROW@austintexas.gov Applicant: Richard Suttle, 512-435-2100, rsuttle@abaustin.com Abutting Landowner: Board of Regents of the University of Texas System The applicant and/or property owner’s representative will be present at the meeting to answer any questions regarding future development and the vacation request. 14 2024-011813 LM - 2024-011813 LM (1909 Comal Street); District 11 of 2 Attachments: Application Packet Master Comment Report 14 2024-011813 LM …
DRAFT C20-2024-018 DDB Phase I Downtown Density Bonus Urban Design Standards These standards would apply only to projects seeking Downtown Density Bonus entitlements and are intended to implement public realm and pedestrian environment objectives that currently apply under §25-2-586. In order to participate in the proposed Downtown Density Bonus (DDB) program, projects would be required to adhere to all mandatory design standards and a minimum number of additional urban design standards from a menu of options. For Phase I of the Downtown Density Bonus update, the proposed requirements would be: - - Projects zoned –DDB400 must adhere to all mandatory standards and at least 7 out of the 14 menu standards to participate in the DDB program Projects zoned –DDB850 must adhere to all mandatory standards and least 10 out of the 14 menu standards to participate in the DDB program In future phases of the Downtown Density Bonus program update, additional combining districts may be created that have different requirements for the minimum number of urban design standards that must be met. Additionally, subdistricts may be created that provide additional urban design standards or requirements based on the unique character of specific areas (such as the Red River Cultural District). Additional design standards may be added in the future. If additional design standards are added to the menu, the minimum number of standards that must be met may be modified. The Urban Design team in Austin Planning will review site plans and determine compliance with the urban design standards. Mandatory Urban Design Standards Screening Requirements (A) Utility equipment, mechanical equipment, and solid waste collection areas, including loading docks, truck parking, outdoor storage, trash collection, trash compaction, and other service functions: a. are prohibited in the area between a building and a street; b. must not be visible from a street, adjacent property lines, or the property lines across adjacent public streets; and c. must be screened or located in a public alley. (B) This subsection applies to a site with frontage on an alley 20 feet or more wide. 15 - C20-2024-018 - Downtown Density Bonus Update Phase 1 1 of 7 DRAFT C20-2024-018 DDB Phase I a. A transformer room or utility vault must be adjacent to and accessible from the alley, unless Austin Energy determines placement is required in another location. b. A pump room, sprinkler room, or other utility or mechanical room must be adjacent to …
Downtown Density Bonus Phase 1 – Proposal Austin Planning | Planning Commission Briefing | 04/14/2026 Agenda • • • Background Existing Program & Process Proposed Changes • Urban Design Standards • Community Benefits | • Downtown Density Bonus Process • Stakeholder Engagement and Timeline 2 Background City Council Resolution Downtown Density Bonus Update Resolution No. 20240718-185 in July 2024 directed staff to update the Downtown Density Bonus (DDB) program Requested: Updates to gatekeeper requirements Integration of Rainey subdistrict Creation of new subdistricts Prioritization of accessibility and shade opportunities Simplification of the affordability program Alignment of the program with the Equitable Transit-Oriented Development (ETOD) overlay. Downtown Density Bonus – Phase 1 In response to Senate Bill 840, Council adopted Ordinance No. 20251023-063, which amended the Central Business District Zone and directed staff to update the DDB program by June 2026 for three DDB subdistricts 4 Existing Program & Process Phase 1 - Existing Height & FAR Map After the recent adoption of the Central Business District Zone amendments and updates to the DDB, the three subdistricts in Phase 1 have the following entitlements available via the DDB program: Core Subdistrict – 350ft of height and 25:1 FAR* Rainey Subdistrict – 350ft of height and 15:1 FAR* Convention Center Subdistrict – 350ft of height and 15:1 FAR* Applicants can request Council approval to exceed these entitlements *FAR limits are only applicable to commercial developments 6 Proposed Changes Phase I – Proposed Applicability Revised to remove the Red River Cultural District from Phase I To be updated and included in Phase II of the DDB Update DDB is a voluntary program Supersedes the following overlays: Capitol Dominance Overlay Equitable Transit-Oriented Development Density Bonus Waterfront Overlay 8 Phase I – Combining Districts Each combining district will have different entitlements/requirements. Phase I will create 2 combining districts: DDB400 has +400 ft DDB850 has +850 ft Additional height is additive to the property’s base zoning height limit E.g., a CBD-DDB400 site could build up to 750 ft (350 ft base height + 400 bonus ft) Sites will be rezoned into DDB400 in Phase I. Sites will be eligible to request rezoning into DDB850 through the standard rezoning process. Max height cannot be exceeded by Council …
From: North Shoal Creek Neighborhood PIan Contact Team Date: April 6,2026 To: City of Austin Housing & Planning Department Planning Commission Re: Recommendation on Plan Amendment Case #NPA-2025-0031.01 and Zoning Case # Cl4-2025-0088, located at 8701 N Mopac Expy SVRD NS The North Shoal Creek Neighborhood Plan Contact Team met in person on April 6,2026 to consider Plan Amendment Case #NPA-2025-0031.01 along with associatedZoning Case #C14- 2025-0088, as amended by applicant in a letter to .Austin Planning Department dated March th, 2026. Both r;ases are associated with the property located at 8701 N Mopac Service Road. As allowed per our bylaws, team members discussed and voted on the question of supporting or opposing the following two items: 1) To change the future land use map (FLUM) from Commerce to Mixed-Use Activity HUB/Corridor; and 2) To change the zoning from CS (General Commercial Services) to LI-PDA (Limited Indu strial District-Planned Development Area). The Contact Team's primary concern with the original application was the inclusion of residential uses for this properfy. In meetings with applicant's counsel, we raised the following issues related to residential uses: a a a a a o a a Ttre site is realistically only accessible by vehicle. There is only access into and out of the property from the northbound Mopac service road, and entry to the on-ramp to 183 is extremely risky. Concern about emergency vehicle access. There is inadequate public transportation. This site is isolated from the Norlh Shoal Creek residential core by the railroad tracks. There is no saf'e connection for pedestrians/cyclists to any of the existing neighborhoods. No contiguous access to Filkrw Elementary for student transport. Adjacent property on the north side is a cornmercial industrial facility (Ergon Asphalt and Emulsions), which is not safe for residents. The applicant's anrendrnent letter dated IVIarch 30,2026 eliminates all residential uses and limits building height to l2A ft.. in light of that update, the Contact Team voted 8 to 0 to support the amenried application to change ttre future land use nrap from Commerce to Mixed Use Activity Corridor and to change the zoning from CS to LI-PDA. The North Shoal Creek Neighborhood Plan Contact Team does not support the 95% impervious and building cover proposed in Exhibit "A" of the applicant's amendment letter and requests that the Planning Cornrriission limit impervious and ouilding cover for this property to 80% due to the proximity to Shoal Creek's …
From: North Shoal Creek Neighborhood PIan Contact Team Date: April 6,2026 To: City of Austin Housing & Planning Department Planning Commission Re: Recommendation on Plan Amendment Case #NPA-2025-0031.01 and Zoning Case # Cl4-2025-0088, located at 8701 N Mopac Expy SVRD NS The North Shoal Creek Neighborhood Plan Contact Team met in person on April 6,2026 to consider Plan Amendment Case #NPA-2025-0031.01 along with associatedZoning Case #C14- 2025-0088, as amended by applicant in a letter to .Austin Planning Department dated March th, 2026. Both r;ases are associated with the property located at 8701 N Mopac Service Road. As allowed per our bylaws, team members discussed and voted on the question of supporting or opposing the following two items: 1) To change the future land use map (FLUM) from Commerce to Mixed-Use Activity HUB/Corridor; and 2) To change the zoning from CS (General Commercial Services) to LI-PDA (Limited Indu strial District-Planned Development Area). The Contact Team's primary concern with the original application was the inclusion of residential uses for this properfy. In meetings with applicant's counsel, we raised the following issues related to residential uses: a a a a a o a a Ttre site is realistically only accessible by vehicle. There is only access into and out of the property from the northbound Mopac service road, and entry to the on-ramp to 183 is extremely risky. Concern about emergency vehicle access. There is inadequate public transportation. This site is isolated from the Norlh Shoal Creek residential core by the railroad tracks. There is no saf'e connection for pedestrians/cyclists to any of the existing neighborhoods. No contiguous access to Filkrw Elementary for student transport. Adjacent property on the north side is a cornmercial industrial facility (Ergon Asphalt and Emulsions), which is not safe for residents. The applicant's anrendrnent letter dated IVIarch 30,2026 eliminates all residential uses and limits building height to l2A ft.. in light of that update, the Contact Team voted 8 to 0 to support the amenried application to change ttre future land use nrap from Commerce to Mixed Use Activity Corridor and to change the zoning from CS to LI-PDA. The North Shoal Creek Neighborhood Plan Contact Team does not support the 95% impervious and building cover proposed in Exhibit "A" of the applicant's amendment letter and requests that the Planning Cornrriission limit impervious and ouilding cover for this property to 80% due to the proximity to Shoal Creek's …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Tomko, Jonathan Martha Newman; Megan Lasch Abby Tatkow; Beeler, Melissa; Meredith, Maureen; Chris Goodpastor; Anita Tschurr; LandUseLiaison Re: Rowen Vale entitlements, waivers, and traffic study Tuesday, April 14, 2026 10:58:15 AM image001.png Outlook-nxwdetch.png Outlook-wa3abmyq.png Per your phone call I am in receipt of the agreement I needed to postpone this case to the 4/28 Planning Commission Meeting. We will not have a discussion postponement this evening. Thank you, Jonathan Tomko, AICP Planner Principal Austin Planning, Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, TX 78752 512-974-1057 jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov From: Tomko, Jonathan <Jonathan.Tomko@austintexas.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 10:51 AM To: Martha Newman < Cc: Abby Tatkow <ATatkow@affordablehousingtexas.com>; Beeler, Melissa <Melissa.Beeler@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Chris Goodpastor < <LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Rowen Vale entitlements, waivers, and traffic study >; LandUseLiaison >; Anita Tschurr < >; Megan Lasch < > Hi Martha, I wanted to clarify whether the neighborhood is now requesting a postponement to the 4/28 Planning Commission meeting or not. Please let me know, Thank you, Jonathan Tomko, AICP Planner Principal Austin Planning, Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, TX 78752 512-974-1057 jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 1
Late Back Up for Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing Correspondence received for Items #6 and #7, NPA-2026-0022.01.SH and C14-2026- 0010.SH _ 206 and 206 ½ E. Annie Street and 1710 Brackenridge Street From: Greg Anderson < > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2026 11:58 AM To: Woods, Alice - BC <BC-Alice.Woods@austintexas.gov>; Haney, Casey - BC <BC- Casey.Haney@austintexas.gov>; Ahmed, Imad - BC <BC-Imad.Ahmed@austintexas.gov>; Maxwell, Felicity - BC <BC-Felicity.Maxwell@austintexas.gov>; Powell, Adam - BC <BC- Adam.Powell@austintexas.gov>; bc-joshua.hiller@austintexas.gov; Ramirez, Nadia - BC <BC-Nadia.Ramirez@austintexas.gov>; Lan, Anna - BC <BC-Anna.Lan@austintexas.gov>; Skidmore, Danielle - BC <BC-Danielle.Skidmore@austintexas.gov>; Bedrosian, Brian - BC <BC-Brian.Bedrosian@austintexas.gov>; Gannon, Chris - BC <BC- Chris.Gannon@austintexas.gov>; Breton, Peter - BC <BC-Peter.Breton@austintexas.gov>; Hunter, Candace - BC <BC-Candace.Hunter@austintexas.gov>; Cohen, Jessica - BC <BC- Jessica.Cohen@austintexas.gov>; Harden, Joi <Joi.Harden@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Beeler, Melissa <Melissa.Beeler@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Item 6 Rowen Vale Dear Planning Commissoiners, I’m writing in support of Item 6, NPA-2026-0022.01.SH (Rowen Vale). One of the most important aspects of this proposal is its location in a high-opportunity area with strong access to jobs, transit, education, and daily needs. These are exactly the places where more Affordable housing is needed. And candidly, these are also the places where proposals like this often draw the most resistance from well-resourced neighbors opposed to change... It’s disappointing to see the project has already reduced its number of homes in response to feedback, yet continues to face opposition. This underscores the broader challenge we face as a city. You will likely hear requests to delay, postpone, or further dilute this proposal. I hope you’ll stay the course and act on it, especially given what looks to be an already packed agenda on the 28th. I appreciate staff’s recommendation and respectfully ask for your support Page 1 of 45 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 45 Thank you for your service and consideration, Greg Greg Anderson M: 512.426.1041 From: Anita Tschurr Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:17 PM To: Tomko, Jonathan <Jonathan.Tomko@austintexas.gov> Cc: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: 206 E. Annie St. Mr. Tomko & Ms. Meredith, I am the Chair of Planning & Zoning for SRCC. I have been working with many neighbors in the Travis Heights area concerning the development of the Church at 206 E. Annie St. I first met with the developer in mid-January 2926 to discuss this development. Then again at the home of one of the neighbors in February, then again at our in person …
06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 26 Annie Street functions as a local residential street, not a corridor or collector. Zoning intensity should reflect that reality. This level of multifamily zoning introduces a scale of density that is not appropriate for this type of street and will lead to ongoing congestion and safety concerns. Additionally, the inclusion of a preschool alongside this level of density creates further risk. Preschool drop-off and pick-up times generate concentrated peak-hour traffic and queuing. Combining this with a 64-unit development on a local street will result in traffic patterns that are inconsistent with the intended function of the neighborhood and increase danger for families. The Future Land Use Map designates this property as Civic, reflecting its long-standing use as a church. Rezoning to multifamily represents a significant departure from that designation and introduces a level of intensity that is not aligned with the surrounding neighborhood or planning guidance. A more appropriate approach would allow for additional housing while maintaining compatibility with the neighborhood. I am not opposing affordable housing. I am advocating for responsible placement and zoning that aligns with Imagine Austin, the Future Land Use Map, and the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan, all of which emphasize appropriate transitions from corridors into established neighborhoods. As a homeowner, neighbor, and steward of a historic property, I ask that you carefully consider the long-term impact of this rezoning, not just in theory, but in the daily lived reality of those of us directly adjacent to this site. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, D’Anne Hiskey CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 92 of 26 "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 93 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 94 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 95 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 96 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 97 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 98 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 99 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 910 of 26 06 NPA-2026-0022.01.SH - Rowen Vale; District 911 of 26 06 …
April 7, 2026 Mayor Kirk Watson, Council Members, City Manager Broadnax P. O. Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 DELIVERED VIA EMAIL RE: NPA-2026-0022.01.SH and C14-2026-0010.SH located at 206 E. Annie Street Dear Mayor Watson and Council Members, The City of Austin spent many taxpayer dollars to produce the Greater South River City Combined (GSRCC) Neighborhood Plan in 2005, a plan that exists in ordinance today. The Austin City Council voted to adopt Ordinance 20050929-Z001 as an amendment to Chapter 5 -22 of the Austin Tomorrow Comprehensive Plan. The ordinance is signed by Mayor Will Wynn and City Attorney David Smith reflecting the work of 27 city staff who worked on the plan. Part 2 ADOPTION AND DIRECTION of the plan subsection (B) states that “the City Manager shall prepare zoning cases consistent with the land use recommendations in the Plan”. The proposal to amend the Future Land Use Map from CIVIC to MF-4 is not consistent with the Neighborhood Plan as listed in the above referenced section of the Ordinance. And for the reasons also listed below in this letter, the GSRCC Contact Team DOES NOT support this proposal to amend the FLUM from CIVIC to MF-4. Residents of Travis Heights and Sherwood Oaks spent 16 months in twice monthly meetings with City of Austin planners from 2003-05. The South River City Citizens used membership dues to mail surveys and newsletters to 6,000 households to gather feedback for the creation of the Neighborhood Plan. City staff held neighborhood and preserve walks to see neighborhood concerns, look for opportunities and talk to residents who came outside to engage. The number one Planning Priority recommendation from this use of taxpayer funds and residents’ efforts was that “New construction and remodeling should be built in proportion to surrounding homes. This includes limiting height, massing and maintaining appropriate setbacks”. The proposed development at 206 E. Annie St. does not even adhere to the first Neighborhood Plan recommendation. It proposes a five-story apartment building across an alley from single story homes built in the early 1900’s. This apartment building is not proposed on S. Congress Avenue but instead two blocks interior to the neighborhood on a neighborhood street. The proposal is on property that ostensibly is a church but, while receiving 100% exemption from all property taxes for many years, has not been used as a place of worship during recent times. Neighbors report the …
Late Back Up for Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing Correspondence received for Items #6 and #7, NPA-2026-0022.01.SH and C14-2026- 0010.SH _ 206 and 206 ½ E. Annie Street and 1710 Brackenridge Street From: Greg Anderson < > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2026 11:58 AM To: Woods, Alice - BC <BC-Alice.Woods@austintexas.gov>; Haney, Casey - BC <BC- Casey.Haney@austintexas.gov>; Ahmed, Imad - BC <BC-Imad.Ahmed@austintexas.gov>; Maxwell, Felicity - BC <BC-Felicity.Maxwell@austintexas.gov>; Powell, Adam - BC <BC- Adam.Powell@austintexas.gov>; bc-joshua.hiller@austintexas.gov; Ramirez, Nadia - BC <BC-Nadia.Ramirez@austintexas.gov>; Lan, Anna - BC <BC-Anna.Lan@austintexas.gov>; Skidmore, Danielle - BC <BC-Danielle.Skidmore@austintexas.gov>; Bedrosian, Brian - BC <BC-Brian.Bedrosian@austintexas.gov>; Gannon, Chris - BC <BC- Chris.Gannon@austintexas.gov>; Breton, Peter - BC <BC-Peter.Breton@austintexas.gov>; Hunter, Candace - BC <BC-Candace.Hunter@austintexas.gov>; Cohen, Jessica - BC <BC- Jessica.Cohen@austintexas.gov>; Harden, Joi <Joi.Harden@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Beeler, Melissa <Melissa.Beeler@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Item 6 Rowen Vale Dear Planning Commissoiners, I’m writing in support of Item 6, NPA-2026-0022.01.SH (Rowen Vale). One of the most important aspects of this proposal is its location in a high-opportunity area with strong access to jobs, transit, education, and daily needs. These are exactly the places where more Affordable housing is needed. And candidly, these are also the places where proposals like this often draw the most resistance from well-resourced neighbors opposed to change... It’s disappointing to see the project has already reduced its number of homes in response to feedback, yet continues to face opposition. This underscores the broader challenge we face as a city. You will likely hear requests to delay, postpone, or further dilute this proposal. I hope you’ll stay the course and act on it, especially given what looks to be an already packed agenda on the 28th. I appreciate staff’s recommendation and respectfully ask for your support Page 1 of 45 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 45 Thank you for your service and consideration, Greg Greg Anderson M: 512.426.1041 From: Anita Tschurr Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:17 PM To: Tomko, Jonathan <Jonathan.Tomko@austintexas.gov> Cc: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: 206 E. Annie St. Mr. Tomko & Ms. Meredith, I am the Chair of Planning & Zoning for SRCC. I have been working with many neighbors in the Travis Heights area concerning the development of the Church at 206 E. Annie St. I first met with the developer in mid-January 2926 to discuss this development. Then again at the home of one of the neighbors in February, then again at our in person …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Tomko, Jonathan Martha Newman; Megan Lasch Abby Tatkow; Beeler, Melissa; Meredith, Maureen; Chris Goodpastor; Anita Tschurr; LandUseLiaison Re: Rowen Vale entitlements, waivers, and traffic study Tuesday, April 14, 2026 10:58:15 AM image001.png Outlook-nxwdetch.png Outlook-wa3abmyq.png Per your phone call I am in receipt of the agreement I needed to postpone this case to the 4/28 Planning Commission Meeting. We will not have a discussion postponement this evening. Thank you, Jonathan Tomko, AICP Planner Principal Austin Planning, Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, TX 78752 512-974-1057 jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov From: Tomko, Jonathan <Jonathan.Tomko@austintexas.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 10:51 AM To: Martha Newman < Cc: Abby Tatkow <ATatkow@affordablehousingtexas.com>; Beeler, Melissa <Melissa.Beeler@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Chris Goodpastor <c <LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Rowen Vale entitlements, waivers, and traffic study >; LandUseLiaison >; Anita Tschurr < >; Megan Lasch < > Hi Martha, I wanted to clarify whether the neighborhood is now requesting a postponement to the 4/28 Planning Commission meeting or not. Please let me know, Thank you, Jonathan Tomko, AICP Planner Principal Austin Planning, Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, TX 78752 512-974-1057 jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 1
Late Back Up for Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing Correspondence received for Items #6 and #7, NPA-2026-0022.01.SH and C14-2026- 0010.SH _ 206 and 206 ½ E. Annie Street and 1710 Brackenridge Street From: Greg Anderson < > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2026 11:58 AM To: Woods, Alice - BC <BC-Alice.Woods@austintexas.gov>; Haney, Casey - BC <BC- Casey.Haney@austintexas.gov>; Ahmed, Imad - BC <BC-Imad.Ahmed@austintexas.gov>; Maxwell, Felicity - BC <BC-Felicity.Maxwell@austintexas.gov>; Powell, Adam - BC <BC- Adam.Powell@austintexas.gov>; bc-joshua.hiller@austintexas.gov; Ramirez, Nadia - BC <BC-Nadia.Ramirez@austintexas.gov>; Lan, Anna - BC <BC-Anna.Lan@austintexas.gov>; Skidmore, Danielle - BC <BC-Danielle.Skidmore@austintexas.gov>; Bedrosian, Brian - BC <BC-Brian.Bedrosian@austintexas.gov>; Gannon, Chris - BC <BC- Chris.Gannon@austintexas.gov>; Breton, Peter - BC <BC-Peter.Breton@austintexas.gov>; Hunter, Candace - BC <BC-Candace.Hunter@austintexas.gov>; Cohen, Jessica - BC <BC- Jessica.Cohen@austintexas.gov>; Harden, Joi <Joi.Harden@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Beeler, Melissa <Melissa.Beeler@austintexas.gov> Subject: Support for Item 6 Rowen Vale Dear Planning Commissoiners, I’m writing in support of Item 6, NPA-2026-0022.01.SH (Rowen Vale). One of the most important aspects of this proposal is its location in a high-opportunity area with strong access to jobs, transit, education, and daily needs. These are exactly the places where more Affordable housing is needed. And candidly, these are also the places where proposals like this often draw the most resistance from well-resourced neighbors opposed to change... It’s disappointing to see the project has already reduced its number of homes in response to feedback, yet continues to face opposition. This underscores the broader challenge we face as a city. You will likely hear requests to delay, postpone, or further dilute this proposal. I hope you’ll stay the course and act on it, especially given what looks to be an already packed agenda on the 28th. I appreciate staff’s recommendation and respectfully ask for your support 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 45 Thank you for your service and consideration, Greg Greg Anderson M: 512.426.1041 From: Anita Tschurr Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2026 5:17 PM To: Tomko, Jonathan <Jonathan.Tomko@austintexas.gov> Cc: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: 206 E. Annie St. Mr. Tomko & Ms. Meredith, I am the Chair of Planning & Zoning for SRCC. I have been working with many neighbors in the Travis Heights area concerning the development of the Church at 206 E. Annie St. I first met with the developer in mid-January 2926 to discuss this development. Then again at the home of one of the neighbors in February, then again at our in person meeting for SRCC. And …
07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 91 of 26 Annie Street functions as a local residential street, not a corridor or collector. Zoning intensity should reflect that reality. This level of multifamily zoning introduces a scale of density that is not appropriate for this type of street and will lead to ongoing congestion and safety concerns. Additionally, the inclusion of a preschool alongside this level of density creates further risk. Preschool drop-off and pick-up times generate concentrated peak-hour traffic and queuing. Combining this with a 64-unit development on a local street will result in traffic patterns that are inconsistent with the intended function of the neighborhood and increase danger for families. The Future Land Use Map designates this property as Civic, reflecting its long-standing use as a church. Rezoning to multifamily represents a significant departure from that designation and introduces a level of intensity that is not aligned with the surrounding neighborhood or planning guidance. A more appropriate approach would allow for additional housing while maintaining compatibility with the neighborhood. I am not opposing affordable housing. I am advocating for responsible placement and zoning that aligns with Imagine Austin, the Future Land Use Map, and the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan, all of which emphasize appropriate transitions from corridors into established neighborhoods. As a homeowner, neighbor, and steward of a historic property, I ask that you carefully consider the long-term impact of this rezoning, not just in theory, but in the daily lived reality of those of us directly adjacent to this site. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, D’Anne Hiskey CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 92 of 26 "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 93 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 94 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 95 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 96 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 97 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 98 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 99 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 910 of 26 07 C14-2026-0010.SH - Rowen Vale; District 911 of 26 07 …
GOVALLE/JOHNSTON TERRACE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN CONTACT TEAM “Strength Through Unity” To: Austin City Council and Planning Commission From: Govalle/Johnston Terrace Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Re: 755 Springdale Rd. (755 Springdale, LP Owner) 755 Springdale Rd., Austin, TX 78702 Proposed zoning change from CS-MU-CO-NP to CS-MU-CO-NP (change a condition of zoning) Case #C14-2026-0004 Dear Council and Planning Commissioners, Please accept this letter on behalf of the Govalle/Johnston Terrace Neighborhood Plan Contact Team as an expression of: Support for the proposed changes to the zoning conditions at 755 Springdale Rd, Austin, Tx 78702: ● Removing the 20 unit per acre conditional overlay to allowing site area cap set forth in the code for MU. ● Conditional overlay adjustments to allow for residential use instead of office use. ● Adjustments to the allowable uses as collaboratively determined by the owner and neighbors. ○ Off-Site Accessory Parking ○ Community Recreation (Private) ○ Community Recreation (Public) ○ Consumer Convenience Services And with the following conditions: ● Commitment to the quick development of the site. ● 5% of rental units above the 1st 97 units allowed under the current conditional overlay designated as affordable at 60% MFI, or 5% of ownership units above the 1st 97 units allowed under the current conditional overlay designated as affordable at 80% MFI. ● Neighborhood Association and owners will work together to advocate for intersection safety improvements at Springdale Road and Lyons. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have regarding this case. Thank you, Candace Fox, Chair Govalle/Johnston Terrace Neighborhood Plan Contact Team 09 C14-2026-0004 - Springdale Farm Follow-Up; District 31 of 1
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Abigail Ventress LandUseLiaison Contreras, Kalan; Historic Preservation Office; Blayre Pena; Ben Dworin Re: 4/14/26 Planning Commission Meeting - 907 E 12th St - Request to Postpone Friday, April 10, 2026 5:04:56 PM Outlook-wcezza0b Outlook-frdt5x1m.png External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon, On behalf of the property owner, we are respectfully submitting another request to postpone the Planning Commission's hearing on the above-mentioned property. The property owner is in the process of trying to arrange for the sale of the property to a neighbor who has expressed interest in purchasing it. If we are able to obtain an LOI before next week's meeting, we will provide it to support this request. Please let me know if this request is granted or if the property will still be discussed at the next meeting. Sincerely, Abigail Abigail Ventress Associate Attorney VBPena Law, PLLC 406 N. Lee Street, Suite 103 Round Rock, Texas 78664 Telephone: (512)642-8585 Email: www.VBPenaLaw.com 12 C14H-2026-0013 - Nitschke-Versea-Goins House; District 11 of 2 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission (and/or the attachments accompanying it) may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney- client privilege. The information is intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Any unauthorized interception of this transmission is illegal. If you have received this transmission in error, please promptly notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of the transmission. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 12 C14H-2026-0013 - Nitschke-Versea-Goins House; District 12 of 2
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 2026, AT 6 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Planning Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than 2 p.m. on the day of the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please use the QR code or link at the end of this document. If you have questions regarding speaker registration, please contact Ella Garcia, Staff Liaison, at LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov or by phone at 512-978-0821. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Alice Woods, Chair (District 2) Casey Haney, Vice Chair (Mayor’s Representative) Felicity Maxwell, Secretary (District 5) Imad Ahmed, Parliamentarian (District 6) Anna Lan (Mayor’s Representative) Vacant (Mayor’s Representative) Chris Gannon (District 1) EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: Nadia Barrera-Ramirez (District 3) Brian Bedrosian (District 4) Adam Powell (District 7) Peter Breton (District 8) Danielle Skidmore (District 9) Joshua Hiller (District 10) Jessica Cohen, Chair of Board of Adjustment TC Broadnax, City Manager EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) Candace Hunter, A.I.S.D. Board of Trustees Richard Mendoza, Director of Transportation and Public Works The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, according to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on the agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071. Staff Liaison: Ella Garcia, 512-978-0821 Page 1 of 5 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first four speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, March 24, 2026. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing on proposed amendments to City Code Title 25 (Land Development) to adopt a new citywide density bonus program that will replace Density Bonus 90 (DB90) and Vertical Mixed Use (V) combining districts and consist of five new combining districts that allow additional …
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 24, 2026 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026 The Planning Commission convened in a regular on Tuesday, March 24, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001, 301 W. Second Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Woods called the Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Alice Woods Felicity Maxwell Imad Ahmed Nadia Barrera-Ramirez Brian Bedrosian Chris Gannon Joshua Hiller Adam Powell Danielle Skidmore Anna Lan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Casey Haney Peter Breton Ex-Officio Members in Attendance: Jessica Cohen Ex-Officio Members Absent: TC Broadnax Candace Hunter Richard Mendoza 1 Vacancy on the Dais 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 24, 2026 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, March 10, 2026. The minutes from the meeting of Tuesday, March 10, 2026, were approved on the consent agenda on Parliamentarian Ahmed’s motion, Secretary Maxwell’s second, on a 12-0 vote. 1 vacancy on the dais. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Plan Amendment: NPA-2023-0014.04 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 2 Location: 4302, 4304 ½, & 4316 Nuckols Crossing Road, Williamson Creek Watershed; Southeast Combined (Franklin Park) Neighborhood Planning Area Owner/Applicant: Katherine Barnidge Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: LOC Consultants Civil Division (Sergio Lozano-Sanchez, P.E.) Single Family to Multifamily Residential land use Pending Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Austin Planning The motion to approve the Neighborhood’s postponement request to May 12, 2026, was approved on the consent agenda on Parliamentarian Ahmed’s motion, Secretary Maxwell’s second, on a 12-0 vote. 1 vacancy on the dais. 3. Rezoning: Location: C14-2025-0065 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 2 4302, 4304 ½, & 4316 Nuckols Crossing Road, Williamson Creek Watershed; Southeast Combined (Franklin Park) Neighborhood Planning Area Owner/Applicant: Katherine Barnidge Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: LOC Consultants Civil Division (Sergio Lozano-Sanchez, P.E.) SF-2-CO-NP to MF-3-NP Pending Nancy Estrada, 512-974-7617, nancy.estrada@austintexas.gov Austin Planning The motion to approve the Neighborhood’s postponement request to May 12, 2026, was approved on the consent agenda on Parliamentarian Ahmed’s motion, Secretary Maxwell’s second, on a 12-0 vote. 1 vacancy on the dais. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 24, 2026 4. Plan Amendment: NPA-2025-0030.01 - Ben White; District 5 Location: 2217 West Ben White Boulevard Service Road Eastbound, Williamson Creek Watershed; South Austin Combined (Westgate) Neighborhood Planning Area Owner/Applicant: RPS Family Enterprises, LP (Robert P. Stern) Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: …
Citywide Density Bonus Program Planning Commission Briefing | March 31, 2026 Agenda ▪ Housing Affordability in Austin ▪ Density Bonus Programs ▪ What We’ve Heard ▪ Citywide Density Bonus Program Proposal ▪ Other Potential Strategies for Affordable Housing ▪ Next Steps Source: City of Austin 2 Housing Affordability in Austin Austin's Affordability Challenges Because Austin has seen population growth over recent decades and housing production has not kept up with this growth, housing costs have increased, making it more difficult for residents to find affordable housing. Affordable housing is a priority in policy initiatives for the City, including the City's historic investment in Project Connect. Source: City of Austin 4 Project Connect Project Connect includes investment in new light rail, a second commuter rail, and new high-frequency, high- capacity bus rapid transit (BRT) lines. New transit investment is often tied to housing development nearby, but new units can be unaffordable to those who rely on transit most. Policy efforts can increase the proportion of affordable housing in project areas so that new transit can meaningfully serve all Austinites. Source: CapMetro 5 Austin's Affordable Housing Needs ▪ The 2017 Austin Strategic Housing Blueprint set a goal of creating 60,000 new affordable units over 10 years while preserving existing affordable housing. ▪ The Blueprint advocates for the use of various strategies and tools, including: o Public subsidies and grants o Public-private partnerships o Fee waivers o Tax incentives o Density bonuses 6 Austin's Affordable Housing Needs ▪ Affordability is measured using Median Family Income (MFI). Austin MFI Level Annual Income (4-person household) Monthly Rent Limit (2-bedroom) ▪ These figures help determine income limits for affordable housing programs, ensuring that rent levels or home sales prices are aligned with what families at various income levels can afford. 30% 50% 60% 80% $40,150 $903 $66,900 $1,506 $80,280 $1,807 $104,200 $2,345 100% $133,800 $3,010 120% $160,550 $3,612 Source: City of Austin, US Department of Housing and Urban Development 7 Austin's Affordable Housing Needs ▪ A recent housing gap analysis found that, generally: o Households at 80% MFI and above ($104,200 for a four-person household) are able to find rental housing that is affordable to them. o The greatest need is at and below 50% MFI ($66,900 for a four-person household). Austin MFI Level Annual Income (4-person household) Monthly Rent Limit (2- Bedroom) 30% 50% 60% 80% $40,150 $903 $66,900 $1,506 $80,280 $1,807 $104,200 $2,345 100% …
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 31, 2026 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 2026 The Planning Commission convened in a regular on Tuesday, March 31, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions, Room 1101, 301 W. Second Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Woods called the Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Alice Woods Felicity Maxwell Brian Bedrosian Chris Gannon Joshua Hiller Danielle Skidmore Casey Haney Peter Breton Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Nadia Barrera-Ramirez Anna Lan Imad Ahmed Adam Powell Ex-Officio Members in Attendance: None Ex-Officio Members Absent: Jessica Cohen TC Broadnax Candace Hunter Richard Mendoza 1 Vacancy on the Dais 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 31, 2026 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, March 24, 2026. The minutes from the meeting of Tuesday, March 24, 2026, were approved on the consent agenda on Commissioner Breton’s motion, Commissioner Skidmore’s second, on a 12-0 vote. 1 vacancy on the dais. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing on proposed amendments to City Code Title 25 (Land Development) to adopt a new citywide density bonus program that will replace Density Bonus 90 (DB90) and Vertical Mixed Use (V) combining districts and consist of five new combining districts that allow additional height and land uses and relax site development standards and compatibility in exchange for providing affordable housing and meeting certain other requirements. Presentation by Warner Cook, Principal Planner, Austin Planning. The presentation was made by Warner Cook, Principal Planner, Austin Planning. PERMANENT COMMITTEE UPDATES 3. Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee – Update pertaining to recommendations to the Planning Commission regarding proposed amendments to the Land Development Code for which review is required under Section 25-1- 502 (Amendment; Review); requests to initiate amendments to the Land Development Code under Section 25-1- 501 (Initiation). (Sponsored by Vice Chair Haney, Secretary Maxwell, and Commissioners Barrera-Ramirez and Gannon) Update was given by Vice Chair Haney. 4. Comprehensive Plan Joint Committee – Update regarding recommendations to the Planning Commission on issues relating to the comprehensive plan, including proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan, including policy directives or initiatives of the city council or the Planning Commission. (Sponsored by Parliamentarian Ahmed and Commissioners Breton, Lan, and Powell) No update was given. 5. Joint Sustainability Committee – Update regarding recommendation …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2026, AT 6 P.M. AUSTIN CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, ROOM 1001 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Planning Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than 2 p.m. on the day of the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please use the QR code or link at the end of this document. If you have questions regarding speaker registration, please contact Ella Garcia, Staff Liaison, at LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov or by phone at 512-978-0821. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Alice Woods, Chair (District 2) Casey Haney, Vice Chair (Mayor’s Representative) Felicity Maxwell, Secretary (District 5) Imad Ahmed, Parliamentarian (District 6) Anna Lan (Mayor’s Representative) Vacant (Mayor’s Representative) Chris Gannon (District 1) EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS: Nadia Barrera-Ramirez (District 3) Brian Bedrosian (District 4) Adam Powell (District 7) Peter Breton (District 8) Danielle Skidmore (District 9) Joshua Hiller (District 10) Jessica Cohen, Chair of Board of Adjustment TC Broadnax, City Manager EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) Candace Hunter, A.I.S.D. Board of Trustees Richard Mendoza, Director of Transportation and Public Works The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, according to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on the agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071. Staff Liaison: Ella Garcia, 512-978-0821 Attorney: AJ Urteaga, 512-974-2386 Page 1 of 9 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first four speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, March 10, 2026. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Plan Amendment: NPA-2023-0014.04 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 2 Location: 4302, 4304 ½, & 4316 Nuckols Crossing Road, Williamson Creek Watershed; Southeast Combined (Franklin Park) Neighborhood Planning Area Owner/Applicant: Katherine Barnidge Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: LOC Consultants Civil Division (Sergio Lozano-Sanchez, …
From: Sergio Lozano < > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 4:53 PM To: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Cc: Joshua Jose < >; Harden, Joi <Joi.Harden@austintexas.gov>; Thomas, Eric <Eric.Thomas@austintexas.gov>; LandUseLiaison <LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov>; Estrada, Nancy <Nancy.Estrada@austintexas.gov>; Kate Walker < > Subject: Re: SECNPT Postpone Request - NPA-2023-0014.04 and C14-2025-0065 Afternoon Maureen I have spoken to the client regarding the postponement, and we are okay with the hearing being moved to May 12th. Should there be any changes or required information, we are at your leisure. Regards, Sergio Lozano-Sanchez, P.E. Principal LOC Consultants Civil Division, Inc 2211 S. IH 35 Frontage Rd. Ste. 107 Austin, TX 78741 Phone: (512) 524-0677 Good evening, Maureen. Thank you for your response. 02 NPA-2023-0014.04 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 21 of 4 I guess the best option we have available to us in light of the circumstances is May 12th. Thank you. Ana Maureen and Nancy, Please see the attached letter from the Contact Team regarding NPA-2023-0014.04 and C14-2025-0065, which includes a postponement request. Thanks, John Sirman 02 NPA-2023-0014.04 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 22 of 4 02 NPA-2023-0014.04 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 23 of 4 02 NPA-2023-0014.04 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 24 of 4
Planning Commission: March 24, 2026 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET NEIGHORHOOD PLAN: South Austin Combined (Westgate) CASE#: NPA-2025-0030.01 DATE FILED: August 21, 2025 PROJECT NAME: Ben White PC DATE: February 24, 2026 March 24, 2026 ADDRESS/ES: 2217 W Ben White Blvd SVRD EB DISTRICT AREA: 5 SITE AREA: 16,443 sq. ft. OWNER/APPLICANT: RPS Family Enterprises LP AGENT: Keepers Land Use Planning (Ricca Keepers) CASE MANAGER: Maureen Meredith PHONE: (512) 974-2695 STAFF EMAIL: Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov TYPE OF AMENDMENT: Change in Future Land Use Designation From: Neighborhood Node To: Mixed Use Activity HUB/Corridor Base District Zoning Change Related Zoning Case: C14-2025-0104 From: CS-NP To: CS-1-NP (building footprint) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN ADOPTION DATE: November 6, 2014 CITY COUNCIL DATE: TBD ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: March 24, 2026 – (action pending) 04 NPA-2025-0030.01 - Ben White; District 51 of 28 Planning Commission: March 24, 2026 February 24, 2026 – Postponed to March 24, 2026 at the request of Staff on the consent agenda. [D. Skidmore – 1st; B. Bedrosian – 2nd] Vote: 12-0 [One vacancy on the dais]. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the Applicant’s request for Mixed Use Activity HUB/Corridor. BASIS FOR STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the Applicant’s request for the Mixed Use Activity HUB/Corridor character district because the property is located along E. Ben White Blvd highway where this land use is appropriate. The property is also located near the major highway interchange of W. Ben White Blvd and South Lamar Blvd. The applicant proposes to rezone the footprint of an existing building to CS-1 for the sale of alcoholic beverages that are primarily to-go and not for on-site consumption. Below are sections of the plan that staff believe supports the applicant’s request. 2 04 NPA-2025-0030.01 - Ben White; District 52 of 28 Planning Commission: March 24, 2026 3 04 NPA-2025-0030.01 - Ben White; District 53 of 28 Planning Commission: March 24, 2026 LAND USE DESCRIPTIONS: EXISTING LAND USE: Neighborhood Node - Neighborhood Node districts contain restaurants, shops, offices, and multi-family housing. The form of these areas is similar to Neighborhood Transition districts but with more commercial activity. Neighborhood Nodes have a 4 04 NPA-2025-0030.01 - Ben White; District 54 of 28 Planning Commission: March 24, 2026 similar mix of uses as Mixed Use Hubs, but primarily serve residents in the neighborhood. Building heights range from one to two stories (although many locations are zoned for greater height). PROPOSED LAND USE: Mixed Use Activity HUB/Corridor …
To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Alice Woods, Chair Planning Commission Members Nancy Estrada, Planner Principal, Austin Planning March 18, 2026 C14-2024-0147 – 1405 East Riverside Drive Staff Postponement Request Staff requests a postponement of the above referenced rezoning case from the March 24, 2026, Planning Commission hearing to April 28, 2026. Traffic analysis information is being provided for staff to review. 06 C14-2024-0147 - 1405 East Riverside Drive; District 91 of 1
To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Alice Woods, Chair Planning Commission Members Nancy Estrada, Planner Principal, Austin Planning March 18, 2026 C14-06-0117(RCT) – 1317 and 1405 East Riverside Drive Restrictive Covenant 2008008550 Staff Postponement Request Staff requests a postponement of the above referenced case from the March 24, 2026, Planning Commission hearing to the April 28, 2026, hearing. This restrictive covenant case is associated with rezoning case C14-2024-0147 – 1405 East Riverside Drive. 07 C14-06-0117(RCT) - 1317 and 1405 East Riverside Drive; District 91 of 1
To: From: Date: Subject: MEMORANDUM Alice Woods, Chair Planning Commission Members Nancy Estrada, Planner Principal, Austin Planning March 18, 2026 C14-72-299(RCT) – 1317 and 1405 East Riverside Drive Restrictive Covenant 4355-1773 Staff Postponement Request Staff requests a postponement of the above referenced case from the March 24, 2026, Planning Commission hearing to the April 28, 2026, hearing. This restrictive covenant case is associated with rezoning case C14-2024-0147 – 1405 East Riverside Drive. 08 C14-72-299(RCT) - 1317 and 1405 East Riverside Drive; District 91 of 1
Imagine Austin Update Austin Planning | March 24, 2026 AGENDA ▪ Why Updating Imagine Austin Matters ▪ Overview of the Past Six Months ▪ Project Goals and Scope ▪ Advisory Groups ▪ Imagine Austin Plan Framework ▪ Imagine Austin Implementation ▪ Project Timeline 2 Why Updating Imagine Austin Matters ▪ Provides a guiding framework Turning community, Council, and department priorities into actionable programs ▪ Cross-departmental alignment and collaboration Breaking down silos so departments can work together more easily and effectively ▪ Provides a strong foundation for decision making Guides choices with up-to-date policies and alignment across citywide plans ▪ Strengthens how the City operates Building a more proactive city 3 Overview of the Past Six Months AUG 28, 2025 SEP - NOV 2025 NOV 20, 2025 NOV 2025 - PRESENT Resolution Adopted Consultant Selected and Onboarded City Council Reallocated $1.5M of IA’s $3M Budget Project Rescoping Phase • Refined scope based on reduced project budget • Identified staff tasks and internal responsibilities 4 Project Goals ▪ Develop a Place Types map to support consistent land use planning throughout Austin that helps achieve citywide goals while recognizing the needs of different communities. ▪ Create regular engagement opportunities with the community. ▪ Update policies to provide clear guidance for current and future planning and decision-making. ▪ Refine the plan document for clearer organization and to be more user-friendly. ▪ Strengthen alignment between Imagine Austin and other citywide strategic plans to provide clearer direction and consistency. 5 Project Scope CONSULTANT LED CITY STAFF LED Project Support Existing Conditions and Future Trends Assessment Task 0 Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Engagement Vision and Goals Task 4 Priority Programs and Policies Land Use Goals and Policies Task 5 Place Types Palette and Methodology Place Types Map Task 6 Task 7 Task 8 Task 9 Plan Alignment Implementation Document Design Task 10 Plan Writing 6 Imagine Austin Community Working Group Evaluation and Selection Process ▪ Applications: ~360 applications ▪ Evaluation Committee comprised of seven departments ▪ Austin Communications and Engagement ▪ Austin Development Services ▪ Austin Housing ▪ Austin Planning ▪ Austin Public Health ▪ Austin Watershed Protection Final Working Group ▪ 45 members - aimed to reflect City of Austin demographics as closely as possible ▪ Duration: 5-6 meetings – Spring 2026 to Summer 2027 ▪ Goal: Support with the creation of the Place Types Map and policy revisions 7 Demographic Breakdown of Working …
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 10, 2026 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2026 The Planning Commission convened in a regular on Tuesday, March 10, 2026, at Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001, 301 W. Second Street, in Austin, Texas. Chair Woods called the Planning Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Alice Woods Casey Haney Felicity Maxwell Imad Ahmed Nadia Barrera-Ramirez Brian Bedrosian Peter Breton Chris Gannon Joshua Hiller Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Adam Powell Anna Lan Danielle Skidmore Ex-Officio Members Absent: TC Broadnax Jessica Cohen Candace Hunter Richard Mendoza 1 Vacancy on the Dais 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, March 10, 2026 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Philip Wiley - Mobility oriented development APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday, January 27, 2026, and Tuesday, February 10, 2026. The minutes from the meeting of Tuesday, January 27, 2026, and Tuesday, February 10, 2026, were approved on the consent agenda on Commissioner Bedrosian’s motion, Commissioner Barrera-Ramirez’s second, on an 11-0 vote. Commissioner Lan was off the dais. 1 vacancy on the dais. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Plan Amendment: NPA-2025-0031.01 - 8701 N Mopac Multifamily; District 10 Location: 8701 North Mopac Expressway Service Road NB, Shoal Creek Watershed; North Shoal Creek Neighborhood Planning Area Owner/Applicant: Mopac Atrium Investments, LLC, a Texas limited liability company Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: Dubois Bryant & Campbell, LLP (David Hartman) Commerce to Mixed-Use Activity HUB/Corridor Staff postponement request to March 24, 2026 Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, maureen.meredith@austintexas.gov Austin Planning The motion to approve Staff’s postponement request to March 24, 2026, was approved on the consent agenda on Commissioner Bedrosian’s motion, Commissioner Barrera- Ramirez’s second, on an 11-0 vote. Commissioner Lan was off the dais. 1 vacancy on the dais. 3. Rezoning: Location: C14-2025-0088 - 8701 N Mopac Multifamily; District 10 8701 North Mopac Expressway Service Road NB, Shoal Creek Watershed; North Shoal Creek Neighborhood Planning Area Owner/Applicant: Mopac Atrium Investments, LLC Agent: Request: Staff Rec.: Staff: Dubois Bryant & Campbell, LLP (David Hartman) CS to LI-PDA Staff postponement request to March 24, 2026 Sherri Sirwaitis, 512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov Austin Planning The motion to approve Staff’s postponement request to March 24, 2026, was approved on the consent agenda on Commissioner Bedrosian’s motion, Commissioner Barrera- Ramirez’s second, on an 11-0 vote. Commissioner Lan was off the dais. 1 vacancy on the dais. 2 PLANNING …
From: Sergio Lozano < > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 4:53 PM To: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Cc: Joshua Jose < >; Harden, Joi <Joi.Harden@austintexas.gov>; Thomas, Eric <Eric.Thomas@austintexas.gov>; LandUseLiaison <LandUseLiaison@austintexas.gov>; Estrada, Nancy <Nancy.Estrada@austintexas.gov>; Kate Walker < > Subject: Re: SECNPT Postpone Request - NPA-2023-0014.04 and C14-2025-0065 Afternoon Maureen I have spoken to the client regarding the postponement, and we are okay with the hearing being moved to May 12th. Should there be any changes or required information, we are at your leisure. Regards, Sergio Lozano-Sanchez, P.E. Principal LOC Consultants Civil Division, Inc 2211 S. IH 35 Frontage Rd. Ste. 107 Austin, TX 78741 Phone: (512) 524-0677 Good evening, Maureen. Thank you for your response. 03 C14-2025-0065 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 21 of 4 I guess the best option we have available to us in light of the circumstances is May 12th. Thank you. Ana Maureen and Nancy, Please see the attached letter from the Contact Team regarding NPA-2023-0014.04 and C14-2025-0065, which includes a postponement request. Thanks, John Sirman 03 C14-2025-0065 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 22 of 4 03 C14-2025-0065 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 23 of 4 03 C14-2025-0065 - 4302 Nuckols Crossing; District 24 of 4
CASES: NPA-2025-0030.01_2217 W Ben White Blvd SVRD EB C14-2025-0104_2217 W Ben White Blvd SVRD EB From: Danielle Lipford Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 8:27 AM To: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Estrada, Nancy <Nancy.Estrada@austintexas.gov>; Brandon Gonzales < Karl Burkett < >; Ricca Keepers < Subject: Withdrawal of rezoning opposition Good Morning Maureen and Nancy, With the new addition of the gate at Ben White, we would like to formally withdraw our opposition to the rezoning. We appreciate your understanding and diligence in this matter. Best, Danielle Danielle Lipford Office Coordinator | Maldonado-Burkett, LLP 2312 Western Trails Blvd., Suite C-303, Austin, TX 78745 O: 512-916-1386 | D: 830-515-4651 www.maldonado-burkett.com 04 NPA-2025-0030.01 - Ben White; District 51 of 1
CASES: NPA-2025-0030.01_2217 W Ben White Blvd SVRD EB C14-2025-0104_2217 W Ben White Blvd SVRD EB From: Danielle Lipford Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 8:27 AM To: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov>; Estrada, Nancy <Nancy.Estrada@austintexas.gov>; Brandon Gonzales < Karl Burkett < >; Ricca Keepers < Subject: Withdrawal of rezoning opposition Good Morning Maureen and Nancy, With the new addition of the gate at Ben White, we would like to formally withdraw our opposition to the rezoning. We appreciate your understanding and diligence in this matter. Best, Danielle Danielle Lipford Office Coordinator | Maldonado-Burkett, LLP 2312 Western Trails Blvd., Suite C-303, Austin, TX 78745 O: 512-916-1386 | D: 830-515-4651 www.maldonado-burkett.com 05 C14-2025-0104 - Ben White; District 51 of 1
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2025-0104 – Ben White DISTRICT: 5 ADDRESS: 2217 West Ben White Boulevard Service Road Eastbound ZONING FROM: CS-NP TO: CS-1-NP SITE AREA: 2,672 square feet out of 0.4865 acres PROPERTY OWNER: RPS Family Enterprises LP (Robert P. Stern) AGENT: Keepers Land Planning (Ricca Keepers) CASE MANAGER: Nancy Estrada (512-974-7617, nancy.estrada@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant commercial – liquor sales – conditional overlay – neighborhood plan (CS-1-CO-NP) combining district zoning. The Conditional Overlay would prohibit the following use permitted in CS-1 base district zoning: Adult-Oriented Businesses. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: March 24, 2026: CITY COUNCIL: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: On November 18, 2025, City of Austin staff sponsored a virtual community meeting to provide an opportunity for the neighborhood plan contact team, nearby residents, property owner, and any other interested parties to discuss the proposed rezoning and the neighborhood plan amendment request. 05 C14-2025-0104 - Ben White; District 51 of 20 C14-2025-0104 Page 2 CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The subject rezoning area consists of a 2,672 square foot building footprint within a 0.4865 acre property. The site is currently developed with an existing business, Big Chill Daiquiris To Go, a beverage establishment for off-premise consumption. The rezoning area is situated along the Eastbound West Ben White Boulevard Service Road. The intersection of South Lamar Boulevard and West Ben White Boulevard, two major arterials, is approximately 0.5 miles to the west. The site is located within the Lamar & Ben White Activity Center, as identified on the Growth Concept Map in the Image Austin Comprehensive Plan. Development along this area is generally characterized by diverse commercial uses, highlighting access to Ben White Boulevard, such as personal improvement services, medical services, automotive repair services, limited restaurants, many with drive-through use, and office uses (CS-NP; CS-1-NP; LO-NP; GR-NP). There is a private easement to the west of the property that extends south to Western Trails Boulevard, where the commercial zoning transitions into single family residences. Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and B (Aerial View). The current use of the subject property is considered non-conforming. The Applicant is seeking to rezone the building footprint (2,672 square feet) on the property to the commercial-liquor sales (CS-1) base district in order to bring the existing use into conformance with land use regulations in the Code. The lot has frontage onto the service road to West Ben White Boulevard, …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C814-2008-0087.02 (South Shore PUD Addition) DISTRICT: 3 ADDRESS: 1705 and 1717 South Lakeshore Boulevard; 1712 East Riverside Drive ZONING FROM: ERC-CMU TO: PUD (add approximately 1.4 acres to the PUD and increase maximum building height to 180 feet). SITE AREA: Approximately 1.4 acres (approximately 60,984 square feet) PROPERTY OWNER: Grayco SS Land 2011, LP and Morrison-Moore Properties, Ltd. AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael J. Whellan) CASE MANAGER: Jonathan Tomko (512) 974-1057, jonathan.tomko@austintexas.gov STAFF RECOMMEDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant a second amendment to planned unit development (PUD) zoning, which would add approximately 1.4 acres to the PUD and increase maximum building height to 180 feet, with the following condition as outlined by Austin Parks and Recreation: • Parkland dedication requirements in effect at the time of site plan submittal apply to any proposed development on the tract, as described by City Code Title 25-1, Article 14 (Parkland Dedication). For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, please see the basis of recommendation section below. PLANNING COMMISSION / OTHER COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: Environmental Commission: The motion to recommend approval of the South Shore Planned Unit Development Amendment with conditions to Austin City Council was made on Commissioner Qureshi’s motion, seconded by Commissioner Krueger, and failed on a 5-1-1 vote. Those voting aye were Commissioners Luecke, Krueger, Qureshi, Morrison, and Sullivan. Commissioner Brimer voted nay. Commissioner Fleury abstained. Commissioners Bristol, Changsut, Fierro, and Moretta-Urdiales were absent. Parks and Recreation Board: The motion to recommend to Austin City Council to not approve the South Shore Planned Unit Development Amendment was approved on Board Member Franklin’s motion, Board Member Eubanks’ second on a 7-2 vote. Those voting aye were Board Members Abou-Emara, Eubanks, Franklin, Kearns-Osterweil, Merritt, 09 C814-2008-0087.02 - South Shore PUD Addition; District 31 of 9 C814-2008-0087.02 2 Orme and Taylor. Those voting nay were Chair Bazan and Board Member Villalobos. Board Members Becker and Flowers absent. March 10, 2026: Postponed at the request of the applicant to March 24, 2026, Planning Commission meeting March 24, 2026: Case is scheduled to be heard by Planning Commission CITY COUNCIL ACTION: TBD ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A ISSUES: As a condition of approval, Austin Parks and Recreation believes it is reasonable to require a PUD to comply with City Code Title 25-1, Article 14 (Parkland Dedication), which states that parkland dedication requirements in effect at the time of …
Affordability Impact Statement South Lakeshore Boulevard ERC Amendment Case number: C20-2025-006 Initiated by: Resolution No. 20250605-079 Date: 3/24/2026 Proposed Regulation The proposed ordinance would amend City Code to remove the 1.437‑acre South Lakeshore Tract, located at South Lakeshore Boulevard and East Riverside Drive, from the East Riverside Corridor (ERC) Regulating Plan. The site is currently a commercial property, and the proposed change would not result in the displacement of any existing multifamily housing. This change would allow the tract to be incorporated into the South Shore District Planned Unit Development (PUD). The resolution directs the City Manager to process the necessary code amendments and return with a draft ordinance for Council consideration alongside the PUD amendment. The amendment would add approximately 1.4 acres to the existing PUD, increase the allowable height on the tract to 180 feet, modify the Waterfront Overlay, and vest the additional acreage under the 2007 Parkland Dedication fees. These changes would enable redevelopment of the site at a higher intensity than currently allowed under the ERC Regulating Plan. The applicant is proposing a high‑density, mixed‑use development directly adjacent to the planned Project Connect light‑rail line. The site’s location along a future high‑capacity transit corridor may support reduced transportation costs for future residents by improving access to frequent transit service. The applicant is not proposing on‑site affordable housing. Under the PUD regulations, the applicant must pay a fee‑in‑lieu for any gross floor area exceeding 125,240 square feet at the rate specified in Section 2.5.6, In Lieu Donation. Fee‑in‑lieu contributions support the City’s affordable housing programs but do not produce income‑restricted units on the site. Overall, the proposed amendments are expected to have a neutral impact on housing affordability. The project would increase the supply of market‑rate housing in a high‑opportunity, transit‑oriented location, while fee‑in‑lieu payments would contribute to the City’s affordable housing funding. 1 10 C20-2025-006 - Amendment to the East Riverside Corridor (ERC) Regulating Plan; District 31 of 2 Land Use/Zoning Impacts on Housing Costs The proposed changes would have neutral impacts on housing costs: • Removing the tract from the ERC Regulating Plan and incorporating it into the South Shore District PUD allows greater height than currently permitted, but no citywide land-use changes are proposed. • The project would add high‑density housing adjacent to the planned Project Connect light‑rail line, increasing market-rate housing supply and reducing transportation costs for future residents. Impact on Development Cost …
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET C20-2025-006 Amendment: C20-2025-006 Amendments to the East Riverside Corridor Regulating Plan (ERC): Conduct a public hearing and consider a recommendation to amend the ERC Regulating Plan to remove the property located at 1705 and 1717 South Lakeshore Boulevard and 1712 East Riverside Drive from the ERC Regulating Plan and to change the boundary of the ERC Regulating Plan. Background and summary of proposed code amendment: This amendment was initiated by the City Council under Resolution No. Resolution No. 20250605-079. Council Sponsors: Mayor Kirk Watson, Council Member Ryan Alter, Council Member Zohaib ''Zo'' Qadri, Council Member José ''Chito'' Vela, Council Member José Velásquez. On February 25, 2010, the City Council adopted the ERC as an amendment to the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. The ERC Plan establishes a long-term vision to transition existing low-density, auto-oriented commercial uses into a pedestrian, and bicycle-friendly, mixed-use urban district. A core objective of the plan is to advance high-quality development and create vibrant places where people can live, work, shop, and recreate within walking distance. In May 2013, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20130509-039 which created the ERC zoning district and established the East Riverside Corridor Regulating Plan (ERC Regulating Plan) and its associated planning area boundary. Council also adopted Ordinance No. 20130509-042 rezoning approximately 228 acres within the East Riverside Corridor to ERC. The approximately 1.437-acre property at 1705 and 1717 South Lakeshore Boulevard and 1712 East Riverside Drive (collectively, the “South Lakeshore Tract”), located adjacent to the South Shore District Planned Unit Development (PUD), was included within the ERC Regulating Plan boundary at that time. The property owner intends to submit a PUD amendment application to modify existing development regulations within the South Shore District PUD and incorporate the South Lakeshore Tract into the PUD. Because the property lies within the ERC Regulating Plan boundary, a Code amendment is required to remove the tract from the ERC Regulating Plan to allow its inclusion in the PUD. This amendment will provide for consistent and cohesive development regulations within the South Shore District PUD. The current ERC Regulating Plan includes several figures that depict the subject property. See Exhibit “A”. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Code Amendment to amend the East Riverside Corridor Regulating Plan to remove the property located at 1705 and 1717 South Lakeshore Boulevard and 1712 East Riverside Drive from the following figures as depicted by …
