22 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION /PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2022-155536 TRAVIS HEIGHTS - FAIRVIEW PARK 1407 ALTA VISTA AVENUE PROPOSAL Remodel a ca. 1932 duplex to convert it to single-family use. Demolish a detached garage and construct a new garage apartment in its place. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Convert duplex to single-family use. Change roofline, remove double entryways and gables, replace siding, replace windows, replace doors, replace porch. Materials include painted aluminum roofing, fiber cement siding, metal windows with wood casing and trim, and painted metal railing. 2) Demo existing garage and build new detached garage apartment. The proposed garage apartment is one and one-half stories in height, with a shed roof and fixed undivided windows. A full-height vertical screen structure accents horizontal fiber cement siding, and a round window appears at the west elevation above a concrete and wood retaining wall. A metal fence to match the main house’s porch guardrail surrounds the garage. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS Two-story Tudor Revival duplex with symmetrical plan, wood siding, and decorative steeply pitched entry gables with ornamental bargeboards, friezes, and brackets. The duplex at 1407 Alta Vista was constructed around 1932 as a rental property for Mrs. John L. Smith. Residents were mostly short-term, and included military servicemen, University of Texas students, clerks, state government employees, and hospital employees. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed alterations remove the remaining character-defining features of the house. 3. Roofs The proposed alterations do not retain the historic roof configuration, pitch, eave detailing, decorative elements, or design. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed replacement siding appears appropriate. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed window replacements further exacerbate the loss of material from the 2013 remodel. They do not match the size and details of the original windows in historic photographs and further alter openings. 6. Porches Though a historic photograph indicates that separate angled stairwells were original to the duplex, there is no precedent for a single angled stairwell leading to a centered entryway; the design does not appear to successfully convey its intended sympathy for the building’s historic form. Residential new construction 1. Location and 2. Orientation …
A B C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 GOAL: CONVERT HOME AT 1407 ALTA VISTA AVE FROM DUPLEX TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND RECONCILE ARTIFACTS FROM 2 PREVIOUS RENOVATIONS TO MAKE THE APPEARANCE MORE SIMPLE, HARMONIOUS AND MORE SYMPATHETIC TO THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WE BELIEVE THAT THE PREVIOUS RENOVATIONS WERE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH THAT 1407 SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A CONTRIBUTING BUILDING, HOWEVER WE STILL INTEND TO BE AS SYMPATHETIC AS POSSIBLE TO THE SCALE, FORM, AND MATERIALITY OF OUR CONTEXT. REAR ADDITION ADDED IN 2013 MAINTAIN ORIGINAL STYLE SIDING ON FRONT AND SIDES -MATCHES 1409 ROOFING TO MATCH CURRENT APPEARANCE AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE WHILE IMPROVING PERFORMANCE REPLACE GABLE ROOF ON REAR ADDITION WITH SHED ROOF. -MATCH CURRENT HEIGHT AND FOOTPRINT. DOOR TRIM REPLACED IN 2013 DOOR TRIM REPLACED IN 2013 PORCH REPLACED MID 1900s DOOR TRIM REPLACED IN 2013 DOOR TRIM REPLACED IN 2013 1 ORIGINAL DUPLEX, ca 1930 NTS 2 PRESENT, CONVERTED TO SINGLE FAMILY IN MID 1900s, AND BACK TO DUPLEX IN 2013 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 PROPOSED ALTERATIONS, 2022 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" REMOVE FRONT DORMERS TO SIMPLIFY PORCH, AND BETTER MATCH NEIGHBORING HOMES. ROOF PITCH TO BE ALTERED ENABLING DEEPER EAVES TO SHADE FRONT PORCH -OWNER NOTED INSUFFICIENT HEAD-HEIGHT CLEARANCE UNDER DORMER EAVES NEW PORCH AND ENTRANCE ADDED MID 1900s FRONT WINDOWS AND DOORS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REPLACED IN 2013 MATCH CURRENT/NEIGHBORING SCALE OF SIDING NEW RESILIENT LANDSCAPING WITH NATIVE PLANTING REPLACE STAIR WITH SINGLE STAIR THAT MIMICS THE ORIGINAL FRONT ELEVATION OF THE HOME. METAL PORCH AND STAIR RAILINGS WILL ALSO BE MORE SIMILAR TO ORIGINAL HOME REPLACE 2013 WINDOWS WITH LARGER CASEMENT WINDOWS -MATCH ORIGINAL WINDOW TRIM SEAL SIMPLIFIED FRONT ROOF MORE SIMILAR TO THAT OF NEIGHBOR SIMPLIFIED FRONT ROOF MORE SIMILAR TO THAT OF NEIGHBOR SIMPLIFIED FRONT ROOF MAINTAINS SCALE SIMILAR TO THAT OF NEIGHBOR SIMPLIFIED FRONT ROOF MORE SIMILAR TO THAT OF NEIGHBOR 1405 ALTA VISTA AVE (NEXT DOOR) 1400 ALTA VISTA AVE (ACROSS STREET) 1409 ALTA VISTA AVE (NEXT DOOR) 1411 ALTA VISTA AVE 1413 ALTA VISTA AVE ARCHITECT: NORMAN KELLEY, INC. 53 W. JACKSON BLVD. STE 1452 CHICAGO, IL 60604 312-374-1039 WWW.NORMANKELLEY.US OWNER: RUSSELL KORTE & CARMEN-CHRISTINA KELLEHER 1407 ALTA VISTA AVE AUSTIN, TX 78704 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT: TBD GENERAL CONTRACTOR TBD CERTIFICATION AND SEAL: I N O T A V O N E R I E …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2002-155175 OLD WEST AUSTIN 1414 WESTOVER RD. 23.0 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS Demolish and rebuild existing non-contributing garage and make modifications to the rear of the primary house. 1) Remove existing non-contributing garage and rebuild a new one; 2) Remove existing concrete and stone driveway ribbons from the garage up to the front corner of the house; 3) Remove concrete from North corner of house The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards for new construction apply to the proposed project: 1. Location The new detached garage will replace the existing garage within the same footprint. The proposed replacement is appropriate. 2. Orientation The orientation of the proposed garage will match the predominant garage orientation found on the block’s contributing properties. The proposed replacement is appropriate. 3. Scale, Massing, and Height The scale, massing, and height of the proposed new construction is appropriate. 5. Design and Style The design and style of the proposed garage is appropriate. Summary The removal of the concrete and stone driveway ribbons will not affect the contributing status of the primary house. The garage to be demolished is non-contributing to the district. The project meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans. LOCATION MAP 23.0 – 2 HR 22-155175 1414 WESTOVER ROAD 1:2400 10/19/2022 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. Property Information Photos 23.0 – 3 1414 Westover Application, 2022
24 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2022-155454 CLAUDIA TAYLOR JOHNSON HALL (RTHL) 210 W. 6TH STREET PROPOSAL Replace roof with skylight system over lightwell, replace pavers over cellar with glass block, construct mechanical areaway, replace glazing, paint windows, install elevator shaft, add doors. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Site: Replace non-original pavers over cellar areaway with glass block to provide additional light at basement level. Add below grade mechanical areaway to south side of building. 2) Roof: Replace non-original roof assembly over historic lightwell with a new modular skylight system. Install new elevator shaft. Replace six skylights/air intake openings. 3) Glazing: Replace glazing at select elevations with laminated, Low-E glazing. 4) Exterior Windows: The exterior windows will be repainted. Final color selection is dependent on full-size mock-ups. A historic finish analysis has been completed and will help guide the owner on color options. 5) Exterior Doors: Add two single-leaf custom steel doors at the north elevation window wall. The steel doors will be designed to match configuration of the historic steel windows. ARCHITECTURE The building’s Recorded Texas Historic Landmark marker describes the limestone temple-fronted Classical Revival post office building as follows: “Constructed during the period 1912-1914. This building was the seventh United States post office location in Austin, Texas. The supervising architect for the neo-classical revival style structure was James Knox Taylor of the U.S. Treasury Department. It was built by Dieter and Wenzel Construction Company of Wichita, Kansas, at a cost of $172,987. The land cost $40,000. Following construction of a new post office and federal building in 1965, the building was given to the University of Texas system by the Federal Government; it was remodeled into administrative offices by the university in 1970. The building was named in honor of Claudia Taylor Johnson, wife of the 36th president of the United States of America.”1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes intact historic windows and glazing and modifies openings to accommodate new fenestration. 3. Roofs The proposed project replaces non-historic roof material and skylights. Replacements do not appear visible from the street. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The …
Kilroy Post Office - Indeed Tower City of Austin Historic Review Application Table of Contents SITE LOCATION MAP HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP INDEX OF KEY PLANS - Basement Floor Plan - First Floor Plan - Second Floor Plan - Attic Floor Plan - Roof Plan INDEX OF PHOTOGRAPHS - Historic - Exterior - Interior - Basement - First Floor - Second Floor - Attic Floor - Roof Floor H1 to H5 E1 to E6 B1-B2 F1 to F9 S1 to S2 A1 R1 to R3 Kilroy Post Office - Indeed Tower Sixth Street Historic District Austin, TX N Kilroy Post Office - Indeed Tower Sixth Street Historic District Boundary from National Register Nomination Austin, TX BLOCK 71 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REF. ARCHITECTURE SERIES BLOCK 71 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REF. ARCHITECTURE SERIES 1 Basement Floor Plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" N PLAN NORTH BLOCK 71 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REF. ARCHITECTURE SERIES OPEN TO FLOOR ABOVE DN DN 1 First Floor Plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" N PLAN NORTH OPEN TO BELOW BLOCK 71 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REF. ARCHITECTURE SERIES N D 1 Second Floor Plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" N PLAN NORTH BLOCK 71 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. REF. ARCHITECTURE SERIES N D 1 Attic Floor Plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" N PLAN NORTH BLOCK 71 NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY, REF. ARCHITECTURE SERIES. 1 Roof Plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" N PLAN NORTH Kilroy Post office | 1914 h1 | historic: south elevation shortly after comPletion Kilroy Post office | 1914 h2 | historic: north and West elevations Kilroy Post office | 1910s h3 | historic: vieW of lobby during construction Kilroy Post office | 1910s h4 | historic: vieW of mail sorting room during construction Kilroy Post office | 1910s h5 | historic: vieW of steel WindoW at north facade Kilroy Post office | 2022 e1 | exterior: south elevation, indeed toWer at right Kilroy Post office | 2022 e2 | exterior: south elevation Kilroy Post office | 2022 e3 | exterior: aerial vieW of indeed toWer With Plaza and Kilroy Post office Kilroy Post office | 2022 e4 | exterior: north elevation With indeed toWer at left Kilroy Post office | 2022 e5 | exterior: north elevation steel WindoWs Kilroy Post office | 2022 e6 | exterior: south elevation, main entry Kilroy Post office | 2022 b1 | basement: vieW of basement level Kilroy Post office …
KILROY 100 FIRST STREET, SUITE 250 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 Page Project No. 121070 HISTORIC REVIEW SUBMISSION 14 OCTOBER 2022 THE POST 210 West 6th Street Austin, TX 78701 Page Southerland Page, Inc. 400 W. Cesar Chavez Street Fifth Floor Austin, TX 78701 pagethink.com TEL FAX 512 472 6721 512 477 3211 ARCHITECTURE / ENGINEERING / INTERIORS / PLANNING / CONSULTING Austin / Dallas / Denver / Houston / San Francisco / Washington DC / International Affiliate Offices DESIGN ARCHITECT ROCKWELL GROUP 5 UNION SQUARE WEST NEW YORK, NY 10003 212-463-0334 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER THORNTON TOMASETTI 804 LAS CIMAS PKWY SUITE 140 AUSTIN, TX 78746 512-580-1750 MEP ENGINEER BLUM CONSULTING 8144 WALNUT HILL LANE SUITE 200 DALLAS, TX 75231 214-373-8222 AUDIOVISUAL CONSULTANT DIMENSIONAL INNOVATIONS 3421 MERRIAM DR OVERLAND PARK, KS 66203 913-384-3488 ARCHITECT OF RECORD PAGE SOUTHERLAND PAGE 400 W CESAR CHAVEZ ST SUITE 500 AUSTIN, TX 78701 512-382-3527 LIGHTING CONSULTANT SEAN O'CONNOR LIGHTING 12955 W WASHINGTON BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90066 310-659-5900 TECHNOLOGY/SECURITY 4B TECHNOLOGY 390 GLENBOROUGH DR HOUSTON TX 77067 832-249-9379 HISTORIC CONSULTANT ARCHITEXAS 2900 S. CONGRESS AVE SUITE 200 AUSTIN, TX 78704 512-444-4220 ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT MCKINNEY YORK ARCHITECTS 1301 E. 7TH ST AUSTIN TX 78702 512-476-0201 ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT IDIBRI 15508 WRIGHT BROTHERS DR ADDISON, TX 75001 972-239-1505 FOOD SERVICE CONSULTANT NEXT STEP DESIGN 913 WEST ST ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401 410-263-1200 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CO'DESIGN 1200 YAUPON VALLEY RD AUSTIN, TX 78746 512-423-1298 t v r . L A R T N E C - 2 2 R - O P K - A 0 7 0 1 2 1 / e c i f f O : E M A N R E S U t s o P y o r l i K - 0 7 0 1 2 1 / / : s c o D k s e d o t u A : E M A N E L I F 8 4 : 5 5 : 1 1 2 2 0 2 / 3 1 / 0 1 : P M A T S E T A D M P 2 2 0 2 R E B O T C O 4 1 0 7 0 1 2 1 r e b m u N t c e j o r P e g a P T S O P E H T SYMBOL MATCHLINE SEE XX/X-XXX DESCRIPTION MATCH LINE SHEET REFERENCE 1 …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS / DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2022-156152 OLD WEST AUSTIN 2212 E. WINDSOR 25.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Alterations to circa 1937 residential structure. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Converting the covered porch and above balcony to conditioned space (front of house). -glass, screen wall, and concrete 2) Expand existing planters, modifying front porch steps. -glass, screen wall & concrete 3) Partially converting covered wood deck space to conditioned space (side of house) – (1st story living room and second story exercise room)- wood, glass, and brick 4) Demolishing the current recessed front entry & walls. ARCHITECTURE 2212 E. Windsor is a two-story masonry residential construction with a flat roof and symmetrical façade with central, recessed entry. The home was modified with replacement windows, doors, significant first and second-story additions, and a balcony circa 2004. RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS Initial research into historical associations includes Paul Bolton, an Austin news commentator and politician circa 1946 who lived at the property. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The project seeks to demolish and construct a new front entryway as well as demolish a rear portion of a side wall. City- wide Design Guidelines encourage repair over replacement. However, the property appears to have been significantly altered and, therefore, would no longer qualify for historic landmarking due to a lack of historic integrity. 1.1 Do not remove intact historic material from the exterior of a building. 1.2 Always attempt repair first. Replacement should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary and for the smallest area possible. 1.3 When historic material must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, replacement materials should look the same, perform reliably within the existing construction, and, in most cases, be made of the same material. 1.5 When demolishing additions or features that were built after the building’s period of significance, minimize damage to the building. a. Stabilize and repair building walls that are exposed when non-historic additions or features are removed. b. Avoid demolition that removes historic structural systems or compromises the structural integrity of a historic building. 4. Exterior walls and trim Exterior walls should be repaired rather than replaced to minimize …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2022-156263 CONGRESS AVENUE 308 CONGRESS AVENUE 26. – 1 Construct a new tower addition to the W. B. Smith Building and adjacent historic age buildings. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Commercial additions 1. Location Reconstruct the street-facing east façade and demolish the remainder of the building to accommodate the new tower. Construct a new mixed-use tower set back 15 feet. Two-part commercial block with dentil ornamentation, corbelled accents, and decorative pilasters on the first floor. Balanced storefront with central door flanked by transom windows on the first floor with 2:2 arched hooded windows above. A small ground-floor entrance door provides access to upper the upper floors located on the far right (as viewed from the street) of the composition of the street-facing façade. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.1 Locate additions at the rear and sides of historic buildings to minimize visual impact. 1.2 Set back additions from the front wall at a distance that preserves the perceived massing of the historic building, considering the pedestrian view from the opposite side of the primary street. a. Additions must be set back at least 20’ from the front wall of the historic building. 1.3 Minimize the loss of historic fabric by connecting additions to the existing building through the most noninvasive location and methods. 1.4 Additions are not appropriate for all historic landmarks and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The addition is located at the rear of the property and is setback initially 15 feet from the historic façade, which the proposed project deconstructs and reconstructs. However, there is a total loss of fabric in all other locations, including the rear and side walls. 2. Scale, massing, and height 2.1 Design the addition to complement the scale and massing of the historic building. 2.2 Design the addition to appear subordinate to the historic building. 2.3 Minimize the appearance of the addition from the primary street(s). The historic building’s overall shape as viewed from the opposite side of the primary street must appear relatively unaltered. 2.4 Additions are subject to a 20’ setback. They may be cantilevered 5’ towards the front wall, but may …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2022-156263 CONGRESS AVENUE 310-314 CONGRESS AVENUE 27. – 1 Construct a new tower addition to the W. B. Smith Building and adjacent historic age buildings. Reconstruct the street-facing east façade and demolish the remainder of the building to accommodate the new tower. Construct a new mixed-use tower set back 15 feet. Two-part commercial block with three separate storefronts. Details include dentil ornamentation at the cornice, recessed entryways, and arched 4:4 windows on the upper floor of 310-312. Historic awnings appear to have been removed, and a new awning was installed at 310. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Commercial additions 1. Location 1.1 Locate additions at the rear and sides of historic buildings to minimize visual impact. 1.2 Set back additions from the front wall at a distance that preserves the perceived massing of the historic building, considering the pedestrian view from the opposite side of the primary street. a. Additions must be set back at least 20’ from the front wall of the historic building. 1.3 Minimize the loss of historic fabric by connecting additions to the existing building through the most noninvasive location and methods. 1.4 Additions are not appropriate for all historic landmarks and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The addition is located at the rear of the property and is setback initially 15 feet from the historic façade, which the proposed project deconstructs and reconstructs. There is total fabric loss in all other locations, including the rear and side walls. The setback does not meet the minimum standard of 20 feet from the front wall of the historic building. 2. Scale, massing, and height 2.1 Design the addition to complement the scale and massing of the historic building. 2.2 Design the addition to appear subordinate to the historic building. 2.3 Minimize the appearance of the addition from the primary street(s). The historic building’s overall shape as viewed from the opposite side of the primary street must appear relatively unaltered. 2.4 Additions are subject to a 20’ setback. They may be cantilevered 5’ towards the front wall, but may not extend closer than 15’ behind …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 5, 2022 SB-2022-135187; GF-2022-139867 CONGRESS AVENUE 900 CONGRESS AVENUE 28 – 1 PROPOSAL Install a sign. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed channel letter sign is located at the south elevation of 900 Congress Avenue. Its white vinyl letters are halo- lit with white LEDs atop an aluminum background. It is approximately 72f t2 in area. The façade module currently contains an existing non-compliant sign with internally lit text of approximately 259 ft2 in area at the top of the building. DESIGN STANDARDS The Guidelines for Signs in Historic Districts or at City Historic Landmarks are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The proposed sign somewhat corresponds to the tenant space at the first floor. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off-premises, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. The proposed sign is flush-mounted. Sign Size: Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. The proposed sign’s area is approximately 72 ft2. Existing non-compliant signage is 259 ft2 in area. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials: Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces are not allowed. Limit the colors used in a sign to no more than three. For sites with multiple signs, all signs should have corresponding or matching designs, coloring, and materials. Signs should match or …
SPECIFICATIONS: REVISED SIZE A. Fabricated halo illuminated channel letters, face and returns painted, internally illuminated with 6500K white LEDs, power supply remote housed in power supply box. B. Mounted with standoff hardware as required Illumination Detail 206.00” B 2.00" A P1 3.00" 12.27 sf 24.86 sf 1.03 sf ” 4 0 2 4 . ” 3 8 . 1 2 A P1 Overall 38.16 sf Primary J-Box Transformer Enclosure Conduit for low voltage wiring Face View Finish Schedule P1: MAP White, satin Proposed size if reducing to under 40 sf would pass the sign Scale 1:48 Side Profile P13668 10.17.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress Halo-illumianted Wall Sign Qty: 1 E.1B CURATIVE HUB - OPTION E.1B - REVISED (Under 40 square feet) SOUTH ELEVATION 160 FT 258.5 SF (existing ) 31.17 SF (not in scope) E.1B 38.16 SF Scale 1:192 P13668 10.17.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress CURATIVE HUB - OPTION E.1B - REVISED (Under 40 square feet) SOUTH ELEVATION - NIGHT VIEW 160 FT 258.5 SF (existing ) 31.17 SF (not in scope) E.1B 38.16 SF Scale 1:192 P13668 10.17.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress SPECIFICATIONS 2.00" 3.00" .125" thick aluminum face Polycarbonate back with translucent white vinyl Air space Electrical penetration Marble Facade 2.00" aluminum standoffs High output 6500K white LED modules Facade on top of CMU .375” D Wedge anchor embedded on brick To transformer enclosure Side Profile Scale 1:10 P13668 10.17.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress Halo-illumianted Wall Sign Qty: 1 E.1B INSTALL LOCATIONS (1) E.B Halo-illumianted Wall Sign 9TH STREET C O N G R E S S P13668 10.17.2022 JJ Curative Exterior Signage 900 Congress
29 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 SB-2022-129156/129174; GF-2022-151135 CONGRESS AVENUE 1001 CONGRESS AVENUE PROPOSAL Install three signs to a noncontributing building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Install an approximately 30 ft2 flush-mounted sign to the south elevation. The proposed sign is internally lit with acrylic letters on an aluminum wireway. 2) Install two flush-mounted signs at the south and west elevations. The proposed signs are approximately 37 ft2 in area and are internally lit, with acrylic letters mounted to the building fascia. DESIGN STANDARDS The Guidelines for Signs in Historic Districts or at City Historic Landmarks are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. Items not addressed in the guidelines below may be resolved by applying the appropriate regulations in Land Development Code § 25-10-8. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The proposed signs are located on a building at the intersection of 10th Street and Congress Avenue. The south façade contains two proposed signs, while the west façade contains one. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off-premises, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. The proposed signs are flush-mounted. Sign Size: 2. Flush-mounted signs: 7% of the overall façade area, with a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet. Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. The proposed signs’ areas are approximately 30 ft2, 37 ft2, and 37 ft2. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials: Use simple shapes, such as …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CC Date: TBD CASE NUMBER: C14H-2022-0139 HLC DATE: November 2, 2022 PC DATE: TBD APPLICANT: J. Pieratt, owner’s agent HISTORIC NAME: Felts-Moss House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 2311 Woodlawn Blvd. ZONING CHANGE: SF-3 to SF-3-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence (SF-3) to family residence-historic landmark (TOD-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, historical associations, and historical associations under Criteria Consideration G of the National Register of Historic Places as defined in Land Development Code § 25-2- 352(A)(1). HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Old Enfield Homeowners Assn., Pease Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Historic Muny District, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: N/a BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. PHONE: 512-974-2727 The 1938 house is a good example of Georgian Revival architecture constructed by central Texas architect Lee M. Smith. It was the first building constructed on Woodlawn Boulevard. According to the application: In 1938, Lee M. Smith's architectural office was at 311 W. 7th St. Smith first appears in the Austin City Directory of 1935 as an architect working for Van C. Kelly Lumber Company, then in the Austin City Directory of 1937 as an architect with Calcasieu Lumber Company, which had its own stable of building designers, most of whom were not certified architects (registration of architects did not begin until the 1930s). He appears to have had his own practice from 1939 to 1943. He is not listed in a city directory after 1942, so given the short time that he …
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Chuck Hopson Contreras, Kalan Re: case # C14H-2022-0139 Thursday, October 13, 2022 1:50:33 PM image001.png *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Thank you so much for your prompt answer & explanation. On Thursday, October 13, 2022, 11:35 AM, Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> wrote: Good morning, Chuck, This property has applied for historic zoning to be added to their existing SF-3 (single-family) zoning. Historic (H) zoning is a zoning overlay which is added to the base zoning and does not change the base zoning itself. To qualify for City Historic Landmark status, a property must meet the local historic designation criteria outlined in Land Development Code Section 25-2-352. The City Historic Landmark Commission reviews all applications for City Historic Landmark designation, with the Austin City Council making final decisions on these designations. Once designated, all proposed exterior site and building changes (other than routine maintenance) to a historically zoned tract require advance review and approval by the City Historic Landmark Commission. I hope this helps! For more information on historic zoning, you may also check out the Historic Preservation Office’s website or contact preservation@austintexas.gov to submit questions or comments. Notification will be sent via mail at least 11 days prior to the public hearing on the application; this also includes a comment form if you prefer to mail in responses. Best, Kalan Contreras MSHP | Senior Planner | Historic Preservation Office Planning and Zoning Department 512.974.2727 | kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov PER CITY ORDINANCE: All individuals scheduling or accepting a meeting invitation with a City Official are requested to provide responses to the questions at the following link: https://bit.ly/HPDLobbyingForm Please note that all information provided is subject to public disclosure. For more information please visit: City of Austin Ordinance 2016-0922-005 | City Clerk’s website | City Clerk’s FAQs From: Chuck Hopson Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 2:09 PM To: Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> Subject: case # C14H-2022-0139 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** What is the difference between SF-3 and SF-3-H and what are they plan on doing with this house located Hi Kalan, at 2311 Woodlawn Blvd? Chuck Hopson, R.Ph. 2106 Hartford Road ATX 78703 hopsonchuck@yahoo.com CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. CAUTION: This …
