1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. WEST (STREET) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. WEST (STREET) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. NORTH (SIDE) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. NORTH (SIDE) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. WEST (STREET) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. SOUTH (DRIVEWAY) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. SOUTH (DRIVEWAY) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. EAST (REAR) ELEVATION 1517 MURRAY LANE EXTG. CONDITION AND DETAIL
C.4 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 22, 2021 GF-2021-014474 1510 WEST 24TH STREET OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Demolish a contributing outbuilding and construct an accessory dwelling unit (ADU). PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish a ca. 1953 carport with attached storage shed. 2) Rebuild existing retaining wall. 3) Construct a new ADU. The proposed ADU is two stories, with an open carport on the ground level and living space above, supported by exposed steel beams. It is clad in board-and-batten siding. The compound hipped, shed, and gabled roof is clad in standing-seam metal, and exposed rafter tails are visible at north, south, and east elevations. A metal guardrail surrounds the covered porch and elevated walkway. The east elevation includes a screened porch. RESEARCH The house at 1510 W. 24th Street was built in 1946 by Major General Arthur Balfour Knickerbocker, Texas State Adjutant, after his resignation as leader of the Texas National Guard. An Odessa native, Knickerbocker helped to organize the state guard there and served as commander until his 1942 appointment by Governor Coke Stevenson. After leaving the Guard in 1946, Knickerbocker and his family left their Camp Mabry living quarters and constructed this home in Pemberton Heights. The carport and attached storage shed were built in 1953 by subsequent owner-occupants Raleigh R. Ross, a physician, and his family. Dr. Ross served as chief of surgery at Brackenridge Hospital before climbing to chief of staff and, for a time, interim superintendent. During the 1950s and beyond, Ross chaired the State Board of Hospitals and Special Schools. Ross also served as president of the Travis County Medical Society and sat on the Board of Trustees for the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children, among other hospital boards. In a 1980 American-Statesman article, Ross is credited with helping to modernize Austin’s medical system after World War II. Lucy Ellen Steck Ross, daughter of reporter and banker Lena Riddle Steck and local printer E. L. Steck, was president of the Junior League and participated in numerous other charity societies. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction projects in National Register historic districts. Applicable standards include: 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property …
MULCH TREES. DO NOT PERMIT TRAFFIC IN CRZ AREA, SET PROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND TREES. TYP.FOLLOW NOTE 6 OF TREE PROTECTION NOTES WHERE PATH CROSSES OVER 1/2 CRZ . STUCCO FENCING 5 4 7 2' - 0" 4" E U N E V A N O S R E T A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 4 ( ' 1 1 . 0 5 E " 9 4 ' 2 5 ° 1 6 S " 0 - ' 5 MULCH TREES. DO NOT PERMIT TRAFFIC IN CRZ AREA, SET PROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND TREES. TYP.FOLLOW NOTE 6 OF TREE PROTECTION NOTES WHERE PATH CROSSES OVER 1/2 CRZ . E U N E V A N O S R E T A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 4 ( ' 1 1 . 0 5 E " 9 4 ' 2 5 ° 1 6 S 23' - 7 1/4" TO MCMANSION BUILD LINE 40' - 0" RESIDENTIAL DESIGN COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SETBACK PLANE SECTION 01 HIGHPOINT OF THE ADJACENT GRADE +547' 547' - 0 3/4" HIGH POINT 01 545' - 11 1/2" ADJACENT HIGH POINT 545' - 4 3/4" HIGH POINT 02 1/2 CRZ 547 1/4 CRZ 22.5 CEDAR " 0 - ' 5 546 8 40' - 0" RESIDENTIAL DESIGN COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SETBACK PLANE SECTION 01 HIGHPOINT OF THE ADJACENT GRADE +545.4' LOT 10 S 26°24'10" W 142.74' 545 544 38' - 9 3/4" RESIDENTIAL DESIGN COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SETBACK PLANE SECTION 01 HIGHPOINT OF THE ADJACENT GRADE +543.2' 543' - 3 7/8" HIGH POINT 03 3 4 5 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK 2 4 5 1 4 5 0 4 5 9 3 5 8 3 5 NEW POOL E C A R R E T E P A C S D N A L W E N E C A R R E T E P A C S D N A L W E N NEW HOUSE 2-STORY WOOD VENEER STUCCO FENCING 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 25" POST OAK R 4' - 0 " T E E R T S H T 2 1 ' 8 0 . 0 5 W " 5 3 ' 9 5 ° 1 6 N NEW CARPORT NEW CONCRETE DRIVE " 4 - ' 2 1 NOTE: NEW SIDEWALK PAVERS W CONSTRUCTION STAGING LOCATION 25' - 0" BM // // K C A …
" 7 - ' 3 1 K C A B T E S 4 # N O I T R O P " 0 - ' 0 4 3 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S " 2 / 1 3 - ' 1 7 " 0 - ' 0 4 2 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S PROPOSED HVAC LOCATION " 0 - ' 0 4 1 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S PROPOSED GAS & ELEC. METER LOCATION ' 2 9 . 7 5 1 E " 5 1 6 0 ° 0 8 S ' " 2 / 1 2 - ' 7 2 E C N E F T L S I E G A N A R D I E G A N A R D I H C N E R T Y T I L I T U D E S O P O R P 7'-1" X 9 9.3' S 10°58'52" W 60.19' EXIST. STONE WALL 100 10' SETBACK N 3 O IN T H P R TI O HI G O @ P 99.7' X 9 9.7' LOT 19 BLOCK 1 X 9 9.9' 100 E G A N A R D I LINE OF EXIST. DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED 1 0 0.5'X OUTDOOR LIVING N 3 O IN T H P R TI O HI G O 100.3' @ P N 2 O IN T H P R TI O HI G O 100.6' @ P 1 0 0.6'X K C A B T E S E D S ' 5 I EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE TO REMAIN FIN. FLR. ELEV=100.02' L A N D S C A P E S T R I P PROPOSED RESIDENCE FIN. FLR. ELEV= 101.00' AVERAGE HEIGHT OF HIGHEST PITCH: 126.67' 1 0 0 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 1 K C A B T E S 4 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S E D S ' I 5 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 7 6 " 0 - ' 0 4 3 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S X 1 0 0.1' 1 0 …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Sadowsky, Steve Contreras, Kalan RE: 2407 Jarratt demo and new construction Thursday, March 11, 2021 4:37:54 PM Thanks, Jimmy. I am forwarding to Kalan Contreras, who is the case manager for this. Steve Sadowsky Historic Preservation Officer City of Austin, Texas 974-6454 From: Jimmy Holland Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 3:13 PM To: Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov> Subject: 2407 Jarratt demo and new construction *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** permit # 2021-019624 The owner presented to the Review Committee and discussed that the owner's original Architect did not know that the Building was a contributing structure to the Historic Neighborhood, so we are asking the staff to do double duty, to review the existing and approve the new design. Please call me on my cell if I can help in any way... Jimmy Holland Holland Architectural 2915 Rio Grande Street Cell: CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
Backup
City of Austin Local Historic District Tax Abatement Part I - Application for Certificate of Eligibility ESTIMATE OF EXPENDITURES Property Address: 1008 E 9th St Austin TX 78702 Proposed Scope of Work Estimated Cost Demolition of non-historic addition Foundation repair below historic structure (the new basment obviates this) Framing & Siding Repairs / Improvements to Historic Struc. $45,806 Plumbing for historic structure (not including fixtures) Electrical for historic structure (not including fixtures) Solar Installation Mechanical (Air Conditioning) for historic structure Roof (standing seam) for historic structure Insulation for historic structure Drywall for historic structure Paint for historic structure (exterior only) Rehabilitate porch for historic structure Window Restoration for historic structure $7620 $0 $20,889 $22,485 $29,177 $18,720 $9053 $5037 $11,525 $12,000 $3,988 $12,700 New aluminum clad wood windows for historic structure $2,540 Exterior & Interior Doors for historic structure $8,500 Pre-rehabilitation/restoration value of property: $108,598 (per imp Total: $188,040 % of value being spent on rehabilitation/restoration: % of total estimated costs being spent on exterior work: 173% 55% Attach additional pages if needed. City of Austin Application for Historic Area District Tax Abatement Adopted December 2012
B.4 - 1 PROPOSAL HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 GF-2021-021341 MARY STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT 508 EAST MARY STREET Rehabilitate and repair contributing house. Rebuild front porch to comply with modern safety standards. Grade and landscape front lawn. Construct a rear addition and carport. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS at entryway. corrugated-metal roof. 1) Restore and patch existing teardrop siding. Replace asbestos siding with matching wood teardrop siding 2) Restore existing wood windows and screens. 3) Construct a carport at east elevation. The proposed structure is steel with wood rafters and a flat 4) Construct a rear addition. The proposed addition is one story, with a curved gabled corrugated-metal roof, vertical wood siding, and full-height fixed and casement windows. 5) Replace asphalt shingle roof in kind. 6) Remove siding from converted screened porch at rear and replace with screens. 7) Add wood attic windows to gables at east and west elevations. Add horizontal wood windows above carport at east elevation. All windows to be further than 15’ from south façade. 8) Remove existing concrete porch and replace with smaller concrete porch. Terrace landscape to reduce number and pitch of steps, adding non-reflective steel edging. 9) Add wood decking to rear and fence backyard. ARCHITECTURE Cross-gabled Tudor Revival cottage with arched entryway, horizontal wood siding, 1:1 single and paired wood windows, exposed rafter tails, and concrete stoop. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Mary Street Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: B. Contributing Properties: Repair and Rehabilitation B.1.a. Do not change the character, appearance, configuration, or materials of the primary façade, except to restore a building to its original appearance. B.1.b. If original elements of the primary façade are missing and if sufficient documentation exists to ensure accuracy, those elements may be restored to their historic appearance. B.1.d. Minimize changes to historic-age secondary elevations of the building that are visible from the principal street frontage. The proposed project restores the building’s façade to its original appearance. There is sufficient site documentation to replace the existing asbestos siding at the central bay with horizontal wood siding. Minimal changes are present at secondary elevations; carport and window additions are set back 15’ from the front wall of the house. B.2.a. Repair damaged exterior wall materials, details, and ornamentation to the greatest extent possible, using treatments that do not damage …
B.5 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 SMOOT-TERRACE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 803 PRESSLER STREET PROPOSAL Construct a new accessory dwelling unit and garage behind a non-contributing building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Remove garage from rear of non-contributing house. 2) Construct detached garage with apartment above. The proposed new L-plan building is two stores, clad in horizontal siding with a cross-gabled roof and second-floor shed dormer at the east elevation. Fenestration includes irregularly placed, undivided fixed and casement windows of varying dimensions, two rooftop skylights, fully glazed sliding door, and a front-facing garage door. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Smoot-Terrace Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. New construction shall have the same street orientation and distance from adjacent buildings as the contributing buildings in the same block. 3. Setbacks for new construction of a new auxiliary building, such as a garage, shall be consistent with setbacks of the district’s contributing auxiliary buildings by taking the average of the existing setbacks of contributing auxiliary buildings on the same block face, or by aligning with the setback of one adjacent contributing auxiliary buildings. This may allow setbacks that are shallower than the base zoning. The proposed ADU has the same street orientation as others in the district. It is set back 5’ and 6’ from the front and side walls of the existing non-contributing house and approximately 71’ from the street. 4. Design new buildings so that they are compatible with, but differentiated from, historic buildings in the district. The proposed building is differentiated from historic buildings in the district by its steeper roof pitch and modern window materials and configurations. The design’s simplicity enhances compatibility, though the street-facing garage door is less compatible. 5. For new residential buildings, garages shall be set back at least 15 feet from the front wall of the building (excluding the porch). The proposed garage apartment is set back approximately 46’ from the front wall of the existing house. 6. Protect large trees from damage during construction and from delayed damage due to construction activities. All applicants must coordinate with the appropriate City departments to coordinate tree protection during demolition and construction. The project mostly meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consider garage relocation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the plans. B.5 - 2
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 22, 2021 GF-2020-171512 1517 MURRAY LANE OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT C.2 - 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Repair damaged structural and decorative elements, replace windows, and construct a second-floor addition to a ca. 1927-29 contributing house. 1) Replace foundation and framing, removing 6” from setback at north elevation. 2) Repair deteriorated decorative elements at main façade. Replace in-kind where deterioration precludes 3) Replace double-hung window sashes to match existing size and profile. Add screens. Reuse window trim where feasible; otherwise, replace in-kind. 4) Extend porch roof at west elevation, with detailing and trim to match existing. 5) Replace eyebrow windows at west elevation with operable windows. Original windows to be retained repair. and stored. 6) Raise existing roof ridgeline 1’-10”. 7) Replace roof with synthetic slate or similar asphalt shingle material. 8) Replace board-and-batten siding at north and south elevations with horizontal siding to match original. 9) Extend existing first floor at north elevation. The proposed addition is clad in brick and contains horizontal ribbon windows. 10) Construct an addition. The proposed rear second-floor addition features a flat roof and is clad in horizontal siding. Fenestration includes fixed ribbon windows and operable louvered windows at side and rear elevations. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story house with horizontal wood siding, side-gabled roof, wood windows with decorative screens, eyebrow dormers, and a partial-width covered porch with curved pediment and Classical columns. The house at 1517 Murray Lane was constructed in 1927-28 by William H. and Delle M. Morley. Morley was the son of W.J. Morley, proprietor of Morley Brothers Druggists, the oldest continuously operating pharmacy and wholesale drug manufacturer in Austin at the time. W.J. Morley and his brother famously employed author Sidney Porter (pseudonym O. Henry), in the latter half of the 19th century. The Morley Brothers Building at 209 East 6th Street is a City of Austin Landmark. S.K. Morley’s house at 510 Baylor Street is listed in the National Register of Historic Places and is also an Austin landmark. S.K. Morley, William H. Morley’s uncle, does not appear to be associated with the Morley drug manufacturing business after the sale of the 6th Street drugstore in the early 1930s. However, William H. Morley continued to run the drug manufacturing and wholesale business from his home at 1517 Murray Lane. Morley’s products were sold under multiple manufacturer names, including Cactus …
C.6 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 22, 2021 PR-2021-003711 1623 WATERSTON AVENUE WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT Demolish a ca. 1937 contributing house and replace with new construction. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish existing house. 2) Construct a new building. The proposed building is two stories, clad in horizontal wood teardrop siding, with a compound roofline. The roof is clad in standing-seam metal and features exposed rafter tails at eaves. The main (north) elevation contains sliding glass doors and partial-width shed-roofed front porch. Fenestration is irregular throughout. It includes paired and single 1:1 windows, fixed horizontal and square single-light windows, and 1:1 sliders in various configurations. A stucco fence surrounds the side and rear yards and the easternmost portion of the front yard. A gable-roofed carport extends to the rear of the lot. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 1623 Waterston Avenue is a two-story house with a steeply pitched gabled roof covered with stamped metal shingles, deep eaves, and a shed-roofed addition at the street elevation. The house is clad in horizontal wood siding with wood and vinyl windows and French doors at the second story, leading to a small deck atop a screened porch addition. A brick chimney adorns the main gable. The house at 1623 Waterston Avenue was constructed in 1937 for Margaret Robertson, daughter of Judge James Harvey Robertson. It served as a rental property until at least 1959. Its longest-term residents were Lewis and Lillian Mayfield. Lewis Mayfield worked as a stonemason and was known for his steadfast support of the Austin Pioneers baseball team, never missing a home game. Lillian Mayfield worked as a fitter and seamstress at Juanita Morris Hat Shop and served as president of the senior hostesses of the USO throughout the 1940s. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction projects in National Register historic districts. Applicable standards include: 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. The existing contributing building would be replaced with noncontributing new construction. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 22, 2021 HR-2021-026856 2407 JARRATT AVENUE OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT C.7 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish existing contributing house and replace with new construction. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish ca. 1939 contributing house. 2) Construct a new residence. The proposed new building is three stories, roughly L-plan and clad in brick and fiber-cement siding. Its main façade features gabled dormers over arched multilight casement windows and a curved gable above the arched entryway. Multilight casement windows appear at first and second floors. The side-gabled roof is clad in composite shingles, and a single chimney projects atop the leftmost bay. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Two-story L-plan residence clad in horizontal wood siding. The house features a compound roofline and partial-width shed-roofed porch. Fenestration includes 6:6, 12:12, and 6-light windows, as well as French doors leading to a second-story balcony at the main façade The house at 2407 Jarratt Avenue served as a duplex from its construction in 1939 by J. C. and Mildred Marshall to 1983, when it was converted to a single-family home. Marshall managed the Coleman Production Credit Association in Coleman, Texas; the Marshalls did not reside in the home until 1955. Early renters included Joe C. Carrier, president of Dill’s, Incorporated—a Venetian blinds manufacturer— and his family. Carrier’s daughter and son-in-law, Robert and Betty Kinnan, also lived in the house while Robert Kinnan worked at Dill’s in the late 1940s. The Carriers and Kinnans resided at 2407 Jarratt until the 1950s. Shorter-term tenants included students and professors at the University of Texas, salespeople, a secretary, and a clerk. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction projects in National Register historic districts. Applicable standards include: 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. The proposed project removes a contributing building from the district and replaces it with a noncontributing building. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The new building is differentiated from adjacent historic …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 22, 2021 HR-2021-027327 73 RAINEY STREET RAINEY STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT C.8 - 1 PROPOSAL Restore siding and columns and replace windows and roof on a ca. 1914 contributing building. Reclad and expand existing addition. Add window wall to rear elevation. Construct new outbuilding at rear. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Restore original teardrop siding and trim. Replace missing columns and remove non-original column at west elevation. 2) Construct accessible route to porch at main elevation. 3) Install a new standing-seam metal roof. 4) Replace vinyl windows with 1:1 double-hung wood windows at main and side elevations, replicating historic trim and profile from photo. 5) Construct a rear outbuilding and modify addition at east elevation. Addition will not increase height of existing 2014 addition. The proposed addition will be clad in Corten metal siding and feature operable doors. Its flat-roofed profile will remain. The proposed outbuilding will have weathered cedar board- and-batten siding and a simple gabled roof that mirrors the roof slope of the main building. 6) Remove illegal tent. 7) Remove rear wall and replace with full-height window wall and matching teardrop siding. ARCHITECTURE A 2012 Historic Preservation Office report describes the original architecture: The existing c. 1914 house is an approximately 1,220 sq. ft., one-story, Greek Revival cottage with a pyramidal roof form and partial width, inset front porch. The house has minimal Greek Revival details, such as the slender, un-fluted columns and simple frieze trim under the eaves. There are two entry doors from the front porch and two double-hung, wood windows on the façade. The porch has a low railing with turned spindles and the house is sided with narrow, drop siding, and has a composition shingle roof. Modifications since 2012 include the addition of a shipping container “garage” at the north elevation, replacement wood siding, window replacements, and removal of the Classical porch columns at the main elevation. RESEARCH The house at 73 Rainey Street was constructed as a rental property around 1914. Grocer Joseph Hubert Zimpelman and his family lived there until they moved into their shop at 902 East 1st Street (now East Cesar Chavez Street) during the early 1920s. Until 1935, the building housed short-term occupants, including a printer, a mechanic, a salon manager, and theater employees. Otto O. and Lillie Schlueder resided at 73 Rainey Street for at least the next …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MARCH 22, 2021 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HR-2021-029755 CLARKSVILLE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1104 TOYATH STREET C.9 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1922 contributing house. ARCHITECTURE One-story gable-roofed house with full-width porch, clad in horizontal wood siding with board-and-batten at gable end. Fenestration includes 1:1 wood windows and an offset front door that may have once been paired. The roof is clad in seamed metal and features exposed rafter tails. RESEARCH The building at 1104 Toyath Street was built around 1922. In its earliest years, the lot hosted a rental property owned by laundress Luisa Roberts, who hosted up to four tenant families at a time. Most tenants worked as laborers or in the service industry. Renter Walter Carrington purchased the property between 1918 and 1920; newspaper records indicate that the current house was built in 1922. Carrington worked at Butler Bricks before becoming a carpenter; his wife, Josephine Johnson Carrington, worked as a cook. Their son, Ralph Carrington, was a painter and contractor. Despite legal trouble, including a 1941 murder charge reported in the Statesman, Ralph Carrington took possession of the home after 1958 and remained there for at least ten years. He constructed two additions to the house: one in 1948 for his mother, and another in 1968. STAFF COMMENTS The house is named as a contributing building in a 2018 inventory of the Clarksville National Register Historic District. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate to high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two historic designation criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). The property may demonstrate significance according to City Code: a) Architecture. The building displays Craftsman influences. b) Historical association. The Commission may wish to consider Walter and Josephine Carrington’s status as long-term Clarksville residents who rented, then owned, their property—one of the limited paths to homeownership for Black residents in segregated twentieth-century Austin. c) Archaeology. The house was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d) Community value. The house does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e) Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical …
Backup
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting Monday, March 22, 2021, 6:00 PM HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION TO BE HELD MARCH 22, 2021 WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (Sunday, March 21 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the March 22 Historic Landmark Commission Meeting, members of the public must: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, March 21 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. • If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion 22 de marzo, 2021 LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (21 de marzo antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974- 1264 o preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MONDAY, JANUARY 25, 2021 – 6:00 PM VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE COMMISSION MEMBERS: x x x x x x Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Witt Featherston Mathew Jacob Kevin Koch Kelly Little x x ab x x Trey McWhorter Alex Papavasiliou Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Chair Myers. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. December 14, 2020 – Discussion MOTION: Approve the December 14, 2020 minutes on a motion by Commissioner Wright. Commissioner Featherston seconded the motion. The motion passed 10–0. 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. No briefings or presentations. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. HDP-2020-0494 – Kenneth and Mildred Threadgill House – Discussion 4310 Rosedale Avenue Council District 10 Proposal: Application for historic zoning. Applicant: Historic Landmark Commission with owner’s consent 1 City Staff: Steve Sadowsky, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-6454 Staff Recommendation: Recommend historic zoning. MOTION: Recommend historic zoning on a motion by Commissioner Featherston. Commissioner Papavasiliou seconded the motion; vote: 10–0. B. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness B.1. C14H-2009-0021 – Jackson-Novy Kelly-Hoey House – Applicant-requested postponement to February 22, 2021 Council District 9 Proposal: Construct a swimming pool and terrace, landscape modifications; remove an attic vent opening on the front of the house. Applicant: Tina Contros City Staff: Steve Sadowsky, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-6454 Committee Feedback: Provide evidence of historic nature of proposed changes and consider another location for the proposed pool. Staff Recommendation: Grant the postponement request. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to February 22, 2021 per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion; vote: 9–0–1 (Papavasiliou off dais). B.2. HR-20-184510 – 121 Laurel Lane – Offered for Consent Approval Aldridge Place Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Demolish existing garage and construct two-story accessory dwelling unit in its place Applicant: Donald Harris City Staff: Steve Sadowsky, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-6454 Committee Feedback: Design a more traditional secondary structure …
Photo: Samuel Huston College Summer Convoocation, 1947 Source: College History Garden via Pinterest TRANSLATING COMMUNITY HISTORY MARCH 22, 2021 NPS UNDERREPRESENTED COMMUNITIES GRANT Increase listings associated with communities underrepresented in the National Register DESIGNATED HISTORIC RESOURCES (2017) PROJECT GOALS 1) Develop a model for proactive community engagement 2) Build community partnerships 3) Creatively link history to people’s lives 4) Begin to address shortage of historically designated properties with racially and culturally diverse associations PROJECT PARTS 1) Community engagement 2) Heritage projects 3) National Register nominations COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER GROUP African American Resource Advisory Commission Austin History Center Blackshear Bridge Carver Center Huston-Tillotson University Preservation Austin Six Square: Austin’s Black Cultural District (initial participant) Neighborhood residents District 1 Council office representative MEXICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER GROUP Austin History Center Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Commission Mexic-Arte Museum Mexican American Cultural Center Tejano Genealogy Society of Austin Tejano Trails/National Park Service Neighborhood residents COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 Outreach materials Engagement strategies Meeting recap Additional outreach Project introduction Select focus areas Heritage project brainstorm Heritage project overview w/ team Nov 2018 May 2019 July Aug Sept Oct March 2020 Community stakeholder group meetings (2 each) Neighborhood meetings COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 1 HERITAGE PROJECTS 2 www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects HERITAGE PROJECTS 2 www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects HERITAGE PROJECTS 2 www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects Spread from College Heights/African American Heritage catalog HERITAGE PROJECTS 2 www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects Spread from South East Austin/Mexican American Heritage catalog HERITAGE PROJECTS 2 www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects Screenshot from South East Austin/Mexican American Heritage video FOCUS AREAS 3 College Heights South East Austin NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATIONS 3 KEY PARTNERS Huston-Tillotson University City of Austin Parks and Recreation Department Huston- Tillotson University Parque Zaragoza HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY 3 The Ramshorn Journal, Apr. 1963, courtesy Huston-Tillotson University Archives The Ramshead Yearbook, ca. 1959, courtesy Huston-Tillotson University Archives PARQUE ZARAGOZA 3 Austin History Center, 1950 Parks and Recreation Dept., n.d. www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects Navasota and Holly, ca. 1950s, Austin History Center
Dougherty Arts Center Replacement Project Preliminary Design Phase Update Boards and Commissions February 2021 Site Map & Context 2 Previous City Council Direction • Butler Shores location approved on 5/9/19 • Council direction to consider site alternatives: on site 1. New DAC & existing PARD Main Office remain 2. New DAC & New PARD Main Office rebuilt on site (unfunded) 3. New DAC on site, existing PARD is removed/relocated elsewhere (unfunded) • Consolidated Arts District Parking (underground, partially unfunded) • Seek alternative financing mechanisms & interest in philanthropy Conceptual development scenario from 2018/2019 planning process 3 Existing PARD Main Office • Constructed 1959, 2-story addition in 1976 • First permanent home for COA Parks Department • High degree of historic integrity • Architect: R. Earl Dillard • Defining features: wide eaves, flat roof, curtain • Eligible for listing on National Register of Historic windows Places Image credits: Austin History Center 4 Recent Stakeholder Engagement • Two Open House Community Meetings • Meeting #1: Oct. 28, 2020 • Meeting #2: Jan. 26, 2021 • (10) Small Group Meetings • Dougherty Arts Center Staff: 11/10/2020 • Painting, Photography, and Drawing Artists and Instructors: 11/19/2020 • Youth Program Instructors and Parents: 12/1/2020 • Gallery Artists: 12/2/2020 • Artist Professional Development Programs: 12/3/2020 • Theater Organizations and Technical Staff: 12/7/2020 • Friends of the Dougherty Arts Center: 12/9/2020 • Ceramics Studio Artists and Instructors: 12/10/2020 • Neighbors to the Dougherty Arts Center: 12/15/2020 • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Arts: 1/7/2021 • Electronic Survey • 221 Participants & 894 Responses • Ongoing Partner Coordination • ZACH Scott Theater • The Trail Foundation • Austin Transportation Dept. 5 Project Mission Statement 6 Site Constraints Map 7 Four Options Key operational criteria and site considerations • Preservation of heritage trees • Relationship to adjacent ZACH • Underground parking solution • Pick-up & drop-off for youth programs • Load-in areas for theater programs • Balancing traffic impact between Toomey Rd. & Riverside Dr. • Preservation of PARD Main Office (1959) • Allowance for possible expansion • Activates parkland & enhance trail access • Civic presence/identity • Back of house areas for kiln yard, etc. 8 • Compact building footprint tucked closely behind PARD Main & ZACH School • One heritage oak impacted • Proposed parking garage sits between ZACH and new DAC, within ZACH lease boundary • PARD Main is retained and renovated/expanded (future scope, unfunded) …
B.1 - 1 PROPOSAL HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 C14H-2009-0021 JACKSON-NOVY-KELLY-HOVY HOUSE 2406 HARRIS BLVD. Construct a swimming pool and terrace, landscape modifications; remove an attic vent opening on the front of the house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Remove 1992 circular drive in front yard. 2) Replace 1992 landscape wall adjacent to the sidewalk with a new 36” high wall. 3) Construct raised terrace faced with brick matching the house; and pool with wrought-iron fence 4) Remove attic fan in front-facing gable and replace with half-timbering and stucco to match existing. surround. ARCHITECTURE Two-story, cross-gabled Tudor Revival house with brick cladding and half-timbering and stucco in the front-facing gable end. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 3) Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Evaluation: While Tudor Revival houses may have terraces, that feature was not historically present at this property. 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Evaluation: The attic fan was a later intervention, and restoration of the decorative half-timbering treatment at the gable end is appropriate. 9) New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Evaluation: The proposed wall at the sidewalk is compatible with the historic character of the property. Though low-lying, the pool, terrace, and fence will be visible and may not be an appropriate new intervention at a historic landmark property. 10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be …
B.1 - 1 PROPOSAL HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 C14H-2009-0021 JACKSON-NOVY-KELLY-HOVY HOUSE 2406 HARRIS BLVD. Construct a swimming pool and terrace, landscape modifications; remove an attic vent opening on the front of the house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Remove 1992 circular drive in front yard. 2) Replace 1992 landscape wall adjacent to the sidewalk with a new 36” high wall. 3) Construct pool in front yard, integrated into the slope of the site, with wrought-iron fence surround. Note: earlier staff report indicated a raised terrace faced with brick. This was proposed in the initial design but removed in response to Committee feedback. See renderings in the file B.1.3 - 2406 Harris Blvd. – Plans in the backup materials. 4) Remove attic fan in front-facing gable and replace with half-timbering and stucco to match existing. Two-story, cross-gabled Tudor Revival house with brick cladding and half-timbering and stucco in the front-facing gable end. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Evaluation: The attic fan was a later intervention, and restoration of the decorative half-timbering treatment at the gable end is appropriate. 9) New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Evaluation: The proposed wall at the sidewalk is compatible with the historic character of the property, and the proposed wrought-iron fence surrounding the pool area is a compatible fence type. Though low-lying and largely integrated into the landscape, the pool edge will be visible from the street and may not be an appropriate new intervention at a historic landmark property. 10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic …
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup
B.3 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 C14H-2009-0021 YERWOOD-SIMOND HOUSE 2005 HAMILTON STREET PROPOSAL Installation of skylights on side and rear-facing roof slopes. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Remove existing light tubes on side-facing roof slopes. 2) Install six low-profile skylights on side- and rear-facing roof slopes, finished to match the existing roofing, to create usable interior space in the attic. ARCHITECTURE One-story, roughly rectangular-plan hipped-and-gabled brick veneered frame house with single and paired 1:1 windows; round-arched entry and arcade along the west elevation of the house; exterior stepped brick chimney on the front façade with randomly-placed stones and caps. The house has Tudor Revival influences in its prominent front gable, but is also reminiscent of colonial French architecture in southern Louisiana with its round-arched brick arcade, gable-on-hip roof style, and massing. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standard applies to the proposed project: 9) New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. Evaluation: The proposed skylights add usable square footage to the house with minimal exterior intervention. The low profile, color selection, and placement to avoid the street-facing roof slope are compatible with and do not detract from character-defining features of the historic house. The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK The skylights’ placement, low profile, and matching color are compatible with the house’s roof. Committee members supported conditional administrative approval, pending review by the full Commission out of concern that the case could be precedent-setting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Concur with Committee feedback and approve the application, while acknowledging this solution may not be appropriate for other landmarks. Staff wishes to note multiple factors specific to this recommendation. The house has a composition shingle roof, a material which is not original, is cyclically replaced, and does not have a distinctive decorative pattern. Further, light tubes installed in the roof prior to the landmark designation in 2009 provide a precedent for this type of intervention. Although larger, the skylights’ lower placement and matching color may be less disruptive to the house’s appearance. …
HAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel 2005 Hamilton Avenue - Architectural Review Committee Presentation m(ødm) HAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel markodomstudio.com 21.02.09 2005 Hamilton Avenue The Yerwood-Simoud House, locally known as 2005 Hamilton Avenue, is an existing single family residence that was built in 1939 by Dr. Charles Yerwood, and his wife Ada Marie DeBlanc Simond. The home’s interiors were remodeled in 2014, but left the unfinished attic untouched. The Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel converts the existing attic volume into a warm, useable space for the current residences. The project completely redefines the interior experience, all while being intentionally respectful to the exterior appearance of this historic home. No additions or alterations were made to the front elevation of the home. The primary focus of the remodel is the redesign of the existing attic space, within the existing roof volume. The experience of the new volume is enhanced by the additional of 6 new “Fakro” skylights. This slim model (less than 6” from shingle to top of glass) allow sunlight to wash into the new living space, enhancing the environment, and save energy by providing natural daylight. Intentional details transport the occupant to the light filled space for reading, gathering and entertaining that complement the space main house below. In this new celebrated space, located within an existing gable, an additional seating area off of the main program that is enhanced by skylights and provide comfortable space for living. intent m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 Exterior Photos_ 2005 Hamilton Avenue -front elevation would remain as is -showing all sides of roof to receive new skylights -existing circular vents would be removed and roofing would be replaced in kind m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 Existing Conditions_ Pre-existing Attic Conditions -space currently only receives natural light from singular window -existing solar tubes to be removed/repaired in kind m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 drawings - floor plans m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 CAR 1 CAR 2 EXISTING GRAVEL K C A B T E S D R A Y K C A B ' 5 EXISTING WOOD DECK BACK YARD EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK EXISTING DRIVE EXISTING 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 25'-0" EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACK EXISTING GRAVEL WALK P E T S E U N E V A N O T L I …
From: To: Subject: Date: Donna Morrow PAZ Preservation 508 E Mary, 78704 Thursday, March 11, 2021 5:04:58 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I approve of the plans to repair & landscape the existing house building & to add onto the rear of the house at 508 East Mary. This block of E. Mary is in a Historic District & the plans will be in accordance with that. Donna Morrow 504 Terrace Dr. Austin 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
PUBLIC IEARING INFORMATION Aldhough applicants and/or their agcnt(s) are expcctod to attend a public hearing., you are not roquired to attend. This meeting wbe conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the poposed developmcnt or change. Email or call the staff contact for infomation on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expresed an interest in an appliention affecting your neighborhood. During a publie hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date, or recommend approval or denial of the applicaticon. If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: delivering a writen statement to the board or commission before the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concem (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development. A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal form may be available from the responsible department. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our website: www.austintexas.gov/abe Written comments must be submitted to the board or commission (or the contact person listed on the notice) before a public hearing. Your comments should include the board or commission's …
B.6 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 C14H-1986-0015, C14H-2004-0008 GRANDBERRY BUILDING AND MITCHELL-ROBERTSON BUILDING CONGRESS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT 907, 909, AND 911 CONGRESS AVENUE Review of a plan to deconstruct, store, and re-erect historic building façades. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Catalog and store, then re-erect the historic building façades as part of a redevelopment project at a later date. Per the applicant, stabilization of the buildings in place is not technically feasible. The project received preliminary approval from the Historic Landmark Commission on January 26, 2015 and June 25, 2018, pending development of more detailed plans for treatment of the façades. ARCHITECTURE Three two-part commercial blocks sharing party walls; buildings are boarded at the street level. At the second floor, the Grandberry Building at 907 Congress has two-over-two light windows with decorative hood moulds, and the Mitchell-Robertson Building at 909 Congress has one-over-one windows and corbelled brickwork at the cornice. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 2) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. 5) Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. While deconstruction and reconstruction of a historic landmark is not a recommended treatment, intensive intervention is necessitated in this case due to major, longstanding conditions. Provided the project entails sufficient care to document, dismantle, store, and re-erect the buildings using original materials to the greatest extent feasible, the project will meet the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consider stabilization of building façades in place rather than removal and reconstruction; provide a detailed condition assessment or other analysis of the buildings’ conditions; and pay particular attention to keeping the corbelled brickwork on the Mitchell-Robertson Building intact. Committee members expressed concern regarding having the buildings down for an indefinite period prior to the redevelopment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Support the project in …
B.7 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 22, 2021 C14H-2009-0065 Judge David J. and Birdie Pickle House 1515 MURRAY LANE PROPOSAL Construct a wood fence with decorative wood gate. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a 6’ tall fence between the south wall of the building and the south property line. The fence consists of horizontal tongue-and-groove wood boards set in a narrow wood frame, with 7’ tall wood posts framing a gate opening. The gate consists of paired arched wood doors with decorative carving. The fence and gate will be set back from the front wall and located behind the chimney. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW 1½-story Tudor Revival house with arched entrance, multi-lite wood-sash wood windows, half-timbering, exterior chimney, and cross-gabled roof. The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards are used to evaluate proposed changes to historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and the spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. The proposed project retains the property’s historic character. No distinctive materials or features are proposed to be removed or altered. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. The proposed project does not create a false sense of historical development. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed project will not destroy historic materials, features, or spatial relationships. The fence is a clean modern design with compatible materials, and the gate is distinct from the style of the building. Both are subordinate to the house in location and size and, while visible from the public right of way, will not detract from the property’s historic character. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic …
B.3 - 1515 MURRAY LANE BACKUP SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT Fence design Gate B.3 - 1515 MURRAY LANE BACKUP SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT Fence and gate location (at person’s location)
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 22, 2021 HR-2020-179883 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA STREET FIESTA GARDENS C.1 - 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS and move ramp to the rear. Modifications to existing facilities at Fiesta Gardens, which is listed in the National Register of Historic Places as a historic district. 1) Rebuild the wood trellis of the bandstand, expand the structure to the east to provide more usable space, 2) Rehabilitate the dining hall, including repairs to address critical maintenance needs, improvements to building systems, and construction of clerestory windows for lighting. 3) Construct an addition to the east of the historic dining hall, to provide support facilities for events. 4) Maintain offices and work areas at the Mercado, with repairs to address critical exterior maintenance. Rehabilitate building interior to provide meeting rooms in a second phase. 5) Restore and rehabilitate grandstand; improve accessibility. Construct a waterfront raised stage and boardwalk in a second phase. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction projects in National Register historic districts. Applicable standards include: 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. The proposed project removes minimal historic material while enhancing the existing facilities. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed clerestory windows at the dining hall will be visible but are limited in height and compatible with the historic building. The dining hall addition is separated from the historic building by a glass lobby that acts as a hyphen. The addition’s simple massing and articulation, stucco cladding, and fenestration patterns are differentiated but compatible with the historic dining hall. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. If the proposed modifications were removed in the future, most of the building and site’s form and integrity would remain. Maintain as much historic fabric as …
H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 1 O F 6 5 F I E S T A G A R D E N S 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S I N T R O D U C T I O N 3 5 R E H A B I L I T A T I O N S T R A T E G I E S 2 9 S U P P L E M E N T A R Y D O C U M E N T S 3 0 S I T E H I S T O R Y 3 3 S T A K E H O L D E R I N P U T 3 7 C H A R A C T E R D E F I N I N G F E A T U R E S 4 2 E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S 5 3 R E H A B I L I TA T I O N S T R A T E G I E S S U P P L E M E N T H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 2 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS I N T R O D U C T I O N H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R …
0 ’ 8 ’ 1 6 ’ 3 2 ’ D I N I N G H A L L : S O U T H E L E V A T I O N | F I E S T A G A R D E N S H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 1 5 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS ADDITIONEXISTINGENTRY COURTYARDSERVICE COURTYARD 0 ’ 8 ’ 1 6 ’ 3 2 ’ D I N I N G H A L L : N O R T H E L E V A T I O N & M O N I T O R S E C T I O N | F I E S T A G A R D E N S H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 1 6 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS EXISTINGENTRY COURTYARDADDITIONSERVICE COURTYARD H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 1 7 O F 6 5 D I N I N G H A L L : I N T E R I O R | F I E S T A G A R D E N S …
S U P P L E M E N T A R Y D O C U M E N T S H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 2 9 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS S I T E H I S T O R Y H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 3 0 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS I N I T I A L P R I VA T E D E V E L O P M E N T • O r i g i n a l l y c o n s t r u c t e d i n 1 9 6 5 -1 9 6 6 • C o n c e i v e d a s p r i v a t e l y - o w n e d t o u r i s t a t t r a c t i o n o n n o r t h e a s t s h o r e o f n e w l y c r e a t e d To w n L a k e , n o w L a d y B i r d L a k e , a r o u n d a g r a v e l p i t - t u r n e d l a g o o n • A t t r a c t i o n s …
B A N D S T A N D E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S : B A N D S T A N D | F I E S T A G A R D E N S H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 4 8 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS LANDSCAPE• Views behind structure limited ARCHITECTURE / STRUCTURE• Non-original yellow paint• Concrete stage in good condition, but high• Wood shade structure in poor condition• Ramp not original; stairs lack handrails M.E.P. SYSTEMS• Limited power and lighting G R A N D S T A N D E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S : G R A N D S T A N D | F I E S T A G A R D E N S H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | M A R C H 2 2 2 0 2 1 | 4 9 O F 6 5 2101 JESSE E. SEGOVIA ST. | AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702FIESTA GARDENS LANDSCAPE• Bald cypress trees are quickly growing at base• Upper bleachers limit views across lakeSTRUCTURE• Non-original paint colors throughout• Paint older, failing• No accessible seating or approach• Steel structure is in good conditionM.E.P. SYSTEMS• Lighting is focused on security, not event use APPROXIMATE 100' CWQZ SETBACK CONCRETE PLAZA; RE: SURVEY TYPICAL LANDSCAPE WALL • 2 COURSES 12" CMU • MEDIUM TEXTURE PAINTED STUCCO EXTERIOR WITH PARTIAL CRACKING THROUGHOUT • ROWLOCK COURSE BRICK COPING SLOPE CONCRETE RAMP & STEEL HANDRAIL CONCRETE STAIR • VARYING HEIGHT RISERS UP TO 10" …
HIST O R IC L A ND M A R K C O M M IS SI O N N A R RA T IVE Fiesta Gardens (19043) 2021-03-22 Project (#) Date Summary of Revised Items A. Site 1. A pocket park is added along Jesse E. Segovia Street with low profile seating, paving, and lighting surrounded by planting to match designs within the plaza 2. Materials, details, and lighting are further developed throughout B. Bandstand 1. The structure’s renovation history is clarified to include early changes to the primary structure and a later addition of an accessible ramp within the plaza 2. Design exhibits highlight the reconstruction of the failing wood pergola and relocation of vertical circulation away from the plaza C. Supplementary exhibits are available toward the end of presentation 1 of 1
Backup
Backup