Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Neena Husid Friday, July 23, 2021 11:02 AM PAZ Preservation 2502 Park View Drive *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Please, please, please stop developers from destroying the integrity of our Austin neighborhoods. This is a great house. I have long admired it and wondered how, if it ever went on the market, I might be able to buy it—to refurbish it, not steam shovel it into oblivion. Allandale is a tight enclave, chocked‐full of friends and neighbors deeply distressed over the systematic leveling of cherished mid‐century homes for cookie‐cutter, poorly built, price‐gouging new constructions. On our street alone there are three identical Paradiso homes priced well‐over a million dollars. Two of these homes have had significant construction issues and detract from the quaint beauty of the much‐loved older homes on the block. It seems to me a city that respects its roots should be working overtime to encourage revitalization to older neighborhoods rather than allowing for the destruction of its gems. Entice architects and builders into our neighborhood who would like nothing more than to help homeowners maintain the integrity of these historic homes. When history, particularly a unique community history, is diminished, caring neighbors and good citizens become apathetic strangers living in rows of uninviting, generic, over‐priced, houses. It’s a sad future and one I hope Austin can avoid. Thank you for listening, Neena Husid 2503 Ellise Avenue 78757 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Margaret Herman Friday, July 23, 2021 11:44 AM PAZ Preservation public comment re: 2502 Park View Drive *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historic Landmark Commission, I'd like to submit a comment on the proposal to demolish 2502 Park View Drive being discussed at your July 26th meeting. My name is Margaret Herman, and I work at a historic preservation agency in New York City (writing today for myself as an individual). I happen to be a former resident of Allandale ‐ my family moved into a house a few streets over from 2502 Park View Drive in the 1980s when I was a young child, and my mother still resides there today. As longtime residents of the neighborhood and for myself as an architectural historian, we both strongly oppose this proposal for demolition. I recently became aware of the proposed National Register nomination for Allandale's Air‐Conditioned Village, of which this property at 2502 Park View Drive is an essential piece. Referred to as the "Chrysler Air Temp Home," it retains a high degree of integrity to its period of significance during the air‐conditioning tests, and its paneled facade and window pattern, its perforated brick screens, and overhanging roof line continue to express the story of Allandale's role in the history of mid‐20th century HVAC engineering and modern architecture in the southwestern United States. Local residents such as my mother are supportive of efforts to preserve the low‐slung 1950s ranch homes of Allandale, many on large lots with mature trees, which contribute to its distinct sense of place and have made it such a beautiful community to raise their families. Now that the historical significance of 2502 Park View Drive and the Air‐Conditioned Village project as a whole has come to light, there's a new level of pride in the neighborhood. Please prevent this demolition from occurring. Surely there are preservation‐minded ways to repair/rehab the house while retaining its historic fabric so that residents in the future can be reminded of the house's and the historic district's importance. Best Regards, Margaret E. Herman, Ph.D. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Annual Internal Review This report covers the time period of 7/1/2020 to 6/30/2021 Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________ The Board/Commission mission statement (per the City Code) is: Pursuant to Section 2-1-147(B) of the Code of the City of Austin, the Historic Landmark Commission: 1. Shall prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks. 2. Shall prepare, review, and propose amendments to the Historic Landmark Preservation Plan. 3. Shall review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission, as determined in accordance with Section 25-1-46 of the Code of the City of Austin. 4. Shall provide information and counseling to owners of structures that are designated as historic structures. 5. May initiate zoning or rezoning of property to establish or remove a historic 6. May recommend amendments to the Code of the City of Austin relating to designation. historic preservation. 7. May recommend that the City acquire property if the Commission finds that acquisition by the City is the only means by which to preserve the property. 8. May advise the Council on matters relating to historic preservation. 9. For an object that is not permanently affixed to land, may recommend that Council confer special historic designation, and 10. Shall perform other duties as prescribed by the Code of the City of Austin or other ordinance. Annual Review and Work Plan – Historic Landmark Commission Year 2020-2021 Page 2 1. Describe the board’s actions supporting their mission during the previous calendar year. Address all elements of the board’s mission statement as provided in the relevant sections of the City Code. 1. The Commission references several surveys in evaluating historical significance for historic-age properties subject to applications for demolition and relocation permits, as well as building permits in National Register districts. These include the East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016), the Old Austin Neighborhood Association / West Downtown survey (2020), and the North Central Austin survey (2021), among others. A survey of Cherrywood, Wilshire Wood, and Delwood is anticipated to be completed in fiscal year 2021-22. 2. The Commission recommended new citywide Historic Design Standards as an essential resource for property owners and professionals that increases equity in City processes. A working group of dedicated residents, professionals, and City staff drafted clear, accessible standards that balance high local development pressures …
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Preservation Plan Committee Thursday, June 24, 2021, 1 p.m. MEETING TO BE HELD WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance. All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Preservation Plan Committee meeting, members of the public must: Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Wednesday, June 23 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to committee members in advance of the meeting. Reunión Especial del Comité del Plan de la Preservación Histórica Un Comité de la Comisión de Sitios Históricos FECHA de la reunion 24 de junio, 2021 LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (23 de junio, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974- 1264 o preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2021 – 1 p.m. VIA VIDEOCONFERENCING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath ___X Terri Myers ___X X Alex Papavasiliou Beth Valenzuela DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No speakers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 15, 2021 MOTION: Approve minutes by Myers, Heimsath seconds. VOTE: 3-0. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. B. Discussion of stakeholders who should be represented in the preservation plan process School districts, esp. AISD Racial diversity/equity advocacy groups, e.g. NAACP, MACC Recruitment will be essential Discuss working group/focus group structure Structure useful, with focused input Get feedback from facilitator about group structure Subcommittees will generate content Ask working group for direction on focus groups Include ways for working group members to educate each other throughout One outcome: Educate neighborhood groups about processes to protect historic Include HLC members to serve as liaisons sites Address increased property taxes 1 1. 2. C. Formal recommendation to Historic Landmark Commission to create Preservation Plan Working Group at its April 26 meeting MOTION: Recommend that Historic Landmark Commission create Preservation Plan Working Group to draft new preservation plan by Heimsath, Myers seconds. VOTE: 3-0. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-1686 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron, Senior Planner, at 512-974-1446. 2
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE FRIDAY, MAY 7, 2021 – 1 p.m. VIA VIDEOCONFERENCING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath X Terri Myers Beth Valenzuela X DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No speakers. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 21, 2021—Minutes not ready B. C. D. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Discuss stakeholders who should be represented in the preservation plan process, considering “seats at the table” Strategize application outreach Project website, social media, direct emails, presentations at monthly meetings Discuss scoring for working group applications More weight if people have multiple community affiliations Scoring approach will differ depending on size of application pool Use scoring as tool to make comparisons, begin evaluation process Provide feedback on draft application Include more info on historic preservation plan; link to SpeakUp Austin page Be clear about the working group’s agency and structure Encourage diversity Not everyone who applies will be able to participate ADJOURNMENT 1 1. 2.
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee Monday, June 14, 2021, 2:00 PM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TO BE HELD MONDAY, JUNE 14, 2021 WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS This meeting is limited in duration. Please make presentations as brief as possible (consider 6–7 minutes) so that all applicants may have the chance to present to and receive input from the committee members. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. Community members may register for citizen communication but may not speak on specific cases on the agenda. The opportunity for public input on specific cases will occur at a subsequent meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. This meeting is not televised. Community members may also register to receive call in information and listen to the meeting via telephone. All participants must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, June 13, 2021) to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions. To listen to or participate in the Architectural Review Committee meeting, all persons must: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, June 13, 2021 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion 14 de junio 2021 a las dos de la tarde (2:00 p.m.) LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ EL LUNES, EL 14 DE JUNIO 2021 CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Esta reunion tiene una duracion limitada. Haga todas …
1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY AND STEPS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY, STEPS, AND PLANTER WALLS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY AND STEPS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF LARGE RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. SIDE ENTRY DOORS AND WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW DOOR AND WINDOW IN MATCHING STYLE OF EXISTING HOUSE. (WINDOWS AND DOORS PROPOSED TO BE REPLACED ARE NOT ORIGINAL TO THE HOUSE.) SOUTH + EAST ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO CHANGES TO BE MADE AT FRONT ELEVATION OF HOUSE. NEW PROPOSED CARPORT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AREA OF RED BOX SHOWN. CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. EXISTING STONE PAVER ENTRY WALKWAY AND STEPS TO BE REPLACED. NEW PLANTINGS THROUGHOUT THE FRONT YARD. LARGE FRONT LAWN TO REMAIN. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW SITE PHOTOGRAPHS CORNER STREET …
MATT GARCIA MATT GARCIA DESIGN DESIGN 1010-B WEST LYNN ST. 1010-B WEST LYNN ST. AUSTIN, T E X A S 78703 AUSTIN, T E X A S 78703 TELEPHONE 210.861.0978 TELEPHONE 210.861.0978 www.mattgarciadesign.com www.mattgarciadesign.com PROJECT PROJECT SUMMIT VIEW SUMMIT VIEW RESIDENCE RESIDENCE 1718 SUMMIT VIEW 1718 SUMMIT VIEW AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 W E I V E R C R O T S H I I 0 2 0 2 2 0 E N U J SHEET/REVISION INDEX KEY NEW SHEET REVISED SHEET NO CHANGE SHEET REMOVED 1.1 - SITE PLAN 1.2 - EXISTING BASEMENT PLAN 1.3 - EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1.4 - EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1.5 - EXISTING ROOF PLAN 1.6 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1.7 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1.8 - ROOF PLAN 2.1 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2.2 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2.3 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2.4 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DATE DATE JUNE 02 2021 JUNE 02 2021 ELEV- 577' ELEV- 577' 1625 24" PECAN P.P. ELEV- 576' ELEV- 575' S 27°24'06" W 159.65' 1693 38" PECAN 1661 14" PECAN 7 7 5 5 7 6 5' SIDE SETBACK 24'-0" HIGH ADJ. GRADE - 576.0' 5 7 6 575 WALKWAY (GRAVEL) PLANTER 574 574 E V O B A F O O R T R O P R A C F O E N L D E H S A D I E G A R O T S NEW CARPORT 480 SF " 0 - ' 0 2 5 7 5 5 7 4 DRIVEWAY (BRICK) 3 7 5 2 7 5 E T A G 1204 25" PECAN NEW ADDITION FFE - 576.1' DASHED LINE OF ROOF ABOVE EXISTING TWO STORY RESIDENCE FFE - 576.1' DASHED LINE OF EXISTNG HOUSE PLANTER ENTRY WALKWAY (BRICK) ENTRY WALKWAY (CONCRETE W/ GRAVEL SURROUND) 571 K C A B T E S T N O R F ' 5 2 R E T N A L P AC AC AC POOL PUMP CREPE MYRTLE MTN LAURELS RAMP DRAIN LOW ADJ. GRADE - 571.0' 5 7 0 573 DECK (WOOD) DASHED LINE OF ROOF ABOVE DECK (WOOD) PLANTER EXISTING TREE #1467 (29" PECAN) TO BE REMOVED, PER ARBORIST ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE. APPROVED PERMIT FOR REMOVAL, 2021-023068 TP 1 7 5 UP Y A W K L A W Y R T N E ) E T E R C N O C ( GATE WALKWAY/PATIO (SOLID SURFACE) NEW …
1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN NEW PROPOSED DETACHED CARPORT SHOWN TO THE RIGHT OF EXISTING HOUSE AT THE END OF THE DRIVEWAY. NEW CARPORT WILL BE SET BACK FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE HOUSE BY 2’-0”. MATERIALS WILL BE STEEL AND DARK WOOD SIDING. THE MATE- RIALS ARE DARK IN COLOR TO COMPLIMENT THE DARK TRIM AND ACCENT COLORS OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN THE THIN ROOF STRUCTURE OF THE CARPORT ALLOWS FOR VIEWS OF THE SIDE OF THE EXISTING HOUSE FROM THE STREET TO BE MAINTAINED. THE FLAT ROOF OF THE CARPORT ALLOWS FOR VIEWS OF THE EXISTING ROOF BEYOND. THE MINIMAL VERTICAL STRUC- TURE IS PURPOSELY PLACED TO STAY OUT OF THE HALF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE NEARBY TREE. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN THE THIN ROOF STRUCTURE OF THE CARPORT ALLOWS FOR VIEWS OF THE SIDE OF THE EXISTING HOUSE FROM THE STREET TO BE MAINTAINED. THE FLAT ROOF OF THE CARPORT ALLOWS FOR VIEWS OF THE EXISTING ROOF BEYOND. THE MINIMAL VERTICAL STRUC- TURE IS PURPOSELY PLACED TO STAY OUT OF THE HALF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE OF THE NEARBY TREE. SOUTH ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN THE THIN ROOF STRUCTURE OF THE CARPORT ALLOWS FOR VIEWS OF THE SIDE OF THE EXISTING HOUSE FROM THE STREET TO BE MAINTAINED. THE FLAT ROOF OF THE CARPORT ALLOWS FOR VIEWS OF THE EXISTING ROOF BEYOND. NEW DOOR AND WINDOW AT SIDE ENTRY TO MATCH STYLE AND SIZES OF EXISTING DOORS AND WINDOWS OF THE HOUSE. EAST ELEVATION 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN SIDE STREET VIEW SHOWS NEW REAR ADDITION. THE RIDGE LINE OF THE NEW ADDITION GABLE ROOF IS 2’-8” LOWER THAN THE HIGH- EST RIDGE OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. THE ADDITION IS PLACED 15’-6” BEHIND THE EXISTING HOUSE AND IS CONNECTED BY A HALLWAY (“HYPHEN”) THAT HAS A FLAT ROOF AS A STRATEGY TO MAINTAIN THAT VISUAL SEPARATION BETWEEN OLD AND NEW. WEST ELEVATION THE DARK WOOD SIDING AND FASCIAS OF THE ADDITION COMPLIMENT THE DARK TRIM AND ACCENTS OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. 1718 SUMMIT VIEW HISTORIC REVIEW PROPOSED DESIGN SIDE STREET VIEW (WITH FENCING AND PLANTING REMOVED FOR VISUAL CLARITY) SHOWS NEW REAR ADDITION. THE RIDGE LINE OF THE NEW ADDITION ROOF IS 2’-8” LOWER THAN THE HIGHEST RIDGE OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. THE ADDITION …
PROJECT LOCATION | PROXIMITY MAP GENERAL NOTES W 9TH STREET W 9TH STREET W 8TH STREET PROJECT LOCATION N N T LY S E W W 6TH STREET 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGLY REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAWINGS, NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND SCHEDULES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE A DETAILED SITE VISIT, AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY BRING ANY INCONSISTENCY, SITE LAYOUT PROBLEM, OR ANY OTHER REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO THE DELIVERY OF ANY BID OR INITIATION OF WORK. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL CAUSE THE CONTRACTOR TO BE INELIGIBLE FOR EXTRAS RELATING TO SUCH MATTERS. 2. THESE DRAWINGS ARE, IN GENERAL, DIAGRAMMATIC. EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FROM FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR'S PERSONNEL. ACTUAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE WORK SHALL FOLLOW LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WITHIN THE CONSTRAINTS OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION. DRAWING AND NOTES TO DRAWINGS ARE CORRELATIVE AND HAVE EQUAL AUTHORITY AND PRIORITY. SHOULD THERE BE DISCREPANCIES IN THEMSELVES OR BETWEEN THEM, CONTRACTOR SHALL BASE BID PRICING ON THE MOST EXPENSIVE COMBINATION OF QUALITY AND/OR QUANTITY OF THE WORK INDICATED. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES, OBTAIN CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT BEFORE CONTINUING WORK. 3. DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR ANY OTHER REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION. 4. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL AND PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5. MINIMUM CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS INDICATED SHALL BE MAINTAINED PARTICULARLY AT STAIRS, CORRIDORS AND RESTROOMS. 6. CONTRACTOR TO ACQUIRE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO WORK. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY, ACTIONS AND CONDUCT OF HIS EMPLOYEES AND HIS SUBCONTRACTORS' EMPLOYEES WHILE IN THE PROJECT AREA, ADJACENT AREAS AND IN THE BUILDING AND ITS VICINITY. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE SHOP DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT FOR OWNER'S, ARCHITECT'S, AND ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. 9. ALL MATERIALS, FINISHES, MANUFACTURED ITEMS, AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUPPLIER'S OR MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS OR THESE DOCUMENTS, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY VARIATION REQUIRED IN THE DIMENSION NOTED FOR VERIFICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT BEFORE CONTINUING THE WORK. 10. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE ON THE PART OF THE ARCHITECT TO ENSURE LOCAL CODE COMPLIANCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THAT THE WORK CONFORMS WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, AND IF DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT …
6 1 3 W E S T L Y N N 1 0 J U N E 2 0 2 1 E X I S T I N G S I T E C O N D I T I O N S WEST LYNN SPEC613 W LYNN ST, AUSTIN TX 7870310 JUNE 2021 AIR CONDITIONED AREA: 4,854 SQFT PROJECT CODE ANALYSIS ZONING: PARCEL ID: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: LOT SIZE: FLOOR AREA RATIO: IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: MAIN HOUSE BASEMENT FLOOR: LEVEL 01: LEVEL 02: TOTAL: ADU LEVEL 01: LEVEL 02: TOTAL: CARPORT: GARAGE: 10'-9 1/2" BUILDING TENT 5; HIGHEST GRADE: 523'-11 3/4" MF-4 NP 106602 V-B 10,130 SQFT (.233 ACRES) PROVIDED: 39% (3,934 SQFT) ALLOWED: MAX 40% (4,052 SQFT) PROVIDED: 43% (4345.5) ALLOWED: 45% (4558.5) 1,187 SQFT 1,868 SQFT 701 SQFT 3,756 SQFT 549 SQFT 549 SQFT 1,098 SQFT 267 SQFT 445 SQFT 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 4; HIGHEST GRADE: 524'-9 1/2" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 3; HIGHEST GRADE: 527'-2" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 2; HIGHEST GRADE: 532'-3" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 1; HIGHEST GRADE: 536'-6" 32'-1/4" BUILDING LINE Y E L L A ' 4 1 . 7 4 W " 5 2 ' 3 2 ° 5 2 S 520 D R A Y R A E R D E C U D E R " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S 521 522 D R A Y R A E R " 0 - ' 0 1 K C A B T E S 520 521 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 1 521'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 2 533'-7 3/4" NEW 2 GARAGE (445 SF) NEW 2-STORY ADU (1,098 SF + 295 SF CARPORT) 523 524 525 0.233 ACRES 10,130 SQ.FT EXISTING POOL HIGH POINT TENT 2 +532'-3" HIGH POINT FRONT SETBACK +536'-3 3/8" 15'-0" HISTORIC PRESERVATION REQUIRED " 7 - ' 9 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 9 SIDE YARD SETBACK 5'-0" MIN. ADJ. GRADE +527'-5 1/2" BASEMENT BELOW REPRESENTED AS HATCHED. FULLY CONTAINED WITHIN LEVEL 1 D R A Y T N O R F " 0 - ' 5 2 K C A B T E S LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD EXISTING PAVING FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 0 527'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 1 538'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 2 550'-7 3/4" NEW 2-STORY ADDITION (3,417 SF) EXISTING 1-STORY TO REMAIN (339 SF) MAX ADJ. GRADE +536'-2" D E P A C …
N o r t h w o o d R e m o d e l A u s t i n , T e x a s T r a v i s C o u n t y VICINITY MAP ABBREVIATIONS AD ADJ AFF APPROX BLDG BOB CB CJ CL CAB CLG CLKG CLO CNTR COL CONC CONSTR CONT CRPT CTR CTSK D DF DO DS DEPT DET DIA DIM DN DR DTL DW DWG DWR EG EXG EJ ELEV EQ EQUIP EXP EXT FA FD FF FFE FOC FOF FOS FDN FIN FLR FRZ FT FTG FURR GB GC GA GALV GL GND GR GWB HB HC HM HDW HDWD HDWR HNDCP HORIZ HR HT ID IN INSUL INT JST JT KIT LIN LB LAB LAM LAV LKR LT LTWT MC MO MECH N MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MIRROR MISCELLANEOUS MOUNTED METAL MULLION NORTH NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NOMINAL OVEN ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER/DIMENSION OVEN & MICROWAVE OBSCURE OPENING PORCELAIN TILE PLATE PLASTIC LAMINATE PLYWOOD PLASTER PLYWOOD PRE-CAST QUARRY BLOCK RISER OR RADIUS ROOF DRAIN ROUGH OPENING REFRIGERATOR - FREEZER ROOF RAFTER RADIUS RECOMMENDATION REFERENCE OR REFRIGERATOR REINFORCED REQUIRED REVISION REGISTER ROOM SOUTH STONE TILE SOLID CORE SOAP DISPENSER STAINLESS STEEL SERVICE SINK SCHEDULE SECTION SHELF SHOWER SIMILAR SPECIFICATION STANDARD STEEL STORAGE STRUCTURAL SYMMETRICAL TONGUE AND GROOVE TREAD TOWEL BAR TOP OF CURB TOP OF TOP OF BEAM TOP OF CONCETE TOP OF DOOR TOP OF WALL TOP OF PAVEMENT TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TRUSS TELEVISION TOP OF WALL TELEPHONE TEMPERED TERRAZO THICK OR THICKNESS TYPICAL UNLESS NOTES OTHERWISE UNFINISHED URNINAL VERTICAL VESTIBULE VERIFY IN FIELD VERIFY WITH BUILDER VERIFY WITH BUILDING DESIGNER VERIFY WITH STRUCTURAL ENGINEER VERIFY WITH INTERIOR DESIGNER VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE DESIGNER VERIFY WITH LIGHTING DESIGNER VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER VERIFY WITH OWNER WEST OR WIDTH WATER CLOSET WROUGHT IRON WATERPROOF WITH WITHOUT WD WAINSCOT WEIGHT AREA DRAIN ADJUSTABLE ABOVE FINISH FLOOR APPROXIMATE BUILDING BOTTOM OF BEAM CATCH BASIN CEILING JOIST CENTERLINE CABINET CEILING CAULKING CLOSET COUNTER COLUMN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CARPET CENTER OR COUNTER COUNTERSUNK DIAMETER DOUGLASS FIR DOOR OPENING DOWNSPOUT DEPARTMENT DETAIL DIAMETER DIMENSION DOWN DOOR DETAIL DISHWASHER DRAWING DRAWER EXISTING GRADE EXISTING EXPANSION ELEVATION EQUAL EQUIPMENT EXPOSED EXTERIOR FIRE ALARM FLOOR DRAIN FINISH FACE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FACE OF CONCRETE FACE OF FINISH FACE OF STUCCO FOUNDATION FINISH FLOOR FREEZER FOOT OR FEET FOOTING FURRING GRAB BAR GENERAL CONTRACTOR GAUGE GALVANIZED GLASS …
4006 ½ Avenue B Addition Materials for Architectural Review Committee 6/12/2021 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 1 Overview The home is a contributing structure in the Hyde Park historic district. A previous addition to the rear of the structure was built around 1991. No original doors or windows remain. Plans were designed by local architect Jim Dunaway, who designed many homes and additions in Hyde Park during his career. Jim lived next door at 4006 Avenue B. 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 2 Plans updated Dormers removed North portion of second-floor reduced by two feet following feedback from zoning. Changes are reflected in the rendered views in this document and updated elevations. 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 3 Street view Existing Proposed 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 4 Oblique View Existing Proposed *Next house on North side is >50 feet away 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 5 Street views with dormers 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 6 Street views no dormers 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 7 Elevation updates Updated Dormers removed Second floor reduced Original submission 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 8 4006 1/2 Avenue B Supplemental Materials for Proposed Addition S1 4413 Avenue C Built: 1927 Second floor added in 2011 S2 4113 Avenue D Built: 1932 Second floor added in 2019 S3 4303 Speedway Built: 1920 Added second floor in 2010 S4 4103 Avenue A Built: 1924 Second floor added in 2003 S5 3913 Avenue F Built: 1906 Second floor added in 2008 S6 4207 Avenue H Built: 1925 Second floor added in 2017 S7 RDC building envelope ' 2 3 45 degrees ' 5 1 elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "A" elev. 609.875' average natural grade REVISED FRONT ELEVATION Scale if printed on 11x17 sheet: 1/8" = 1' - 0" Scale if printed on 24x36 sheet: 1/4" = 1' - 0" RDC building envelope in Parcel "A" RDC building envelope in Parcel "B" 45 degrees ' 5 1 elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "A" elev. 609.875' average natural grade elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "B" ' 0 1 top of existing wall plate wood frame windows finish floor elev. 612.0' " 4 / 1 4 - ' 8 1 elev. 610.25' highest elev. in RDC Parcel "A" elev. 609.875' average natural grade L2 Plate 45 degrees ' 5 1 REVISED REAR ELEVATION Scale if printed on 11x17 sheet: 1/8" = …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2021 – 6:00 PM VIA VIDEOCONFERENCING COMMISSION MEMBERS: x ab ab x x x Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Anissa Castillo Witt Featherston Kevin Koch Carl Larosche x x x x x Kelly Little Trey McWhorter Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: 6:05 P.M. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL There were no speakers. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. March 22, 2021 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Valenzuela seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0. 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Presentation and discussion of the former Threadgill’s No. 1, 6416 N. Lamar Blvd. Victoria Haase spoke to solicit feedback from the Commission. MOTION: Recommend further study and direct the property owner to keep as much existing fabric as possible on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner Valenzuela seconded the motion; vote: 9-0. B. Discussion and possible action in response to National Register of Historic Places nomination for Third Street Railroad Trestle, west end of W. 3rd St. at Shoal Creek Nomination available at: https://www.thc.texas.gov/sbrmeeting 1 MOTION: Endorse the application, recommending the nomination to the State Board of Review, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Tollett seconded the motion; vote: 9-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. C14H-2021-0057 – 5312 Shoal Creek Blvd. – Discussion Kohn House Council District 7 Applicant: Aaron Franklin, owner City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Staff Recommendation: Recommend historic zoning. Ken Johnson and Darwin Harrison spoke in favor of historic zoning. Neil Crane spoke in opposition. MOTION: Recommend historic zoning pending resolution of boundary dispute on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0. B. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness B.1. HR-2021-050823 – 5312 Shoal Creek Blvd. – Discussion Kohn House Council District 7 Proposal: Construct an addition Applicant: Aaron Franklin City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Committee Feedback: The committee expressed concerns that the addition competes with the historic tower, with the extent of proposed landscaping modifications, and regarding the applicant’s ability to obtain landmark status with the proposed changes. Staff Recommendation: See staff report. Ken Johnson, Christy Ten …
