Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Contreras, Kalan Monday, November 16, 2020 9:53 AM Gaudette, Angela FW: 1208 W. 22nd St: HLC Agenda for Monday, Nov. 16: Supplemental information for Agenda Item D-8 From: Cousar, James E. < Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 11:04 AM To: Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov>; Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov> Cc: Radkey, Ingrid Subject: Re: 1208 W. 22nd St: HLC Agenda for Monday, Nov. 16: Supplemental information for Agenda Item D‐8 Cousar, James E. > *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=109349 Steve and Kalan‐ Ms. Radkey, the owner of 1208 W. 22nd, has asked me to submit the following supplemental information to be considered by the HLC. In 2007, the house across the street‐ 1305 W. 22nd St‐ received historic landmark designation as the Goff‐Radkey House. The attachment is the City Council’s “Zoning Change Information Sheet” from the meeting at which landmark status was approved. We think this supplemental information is important and relevant because the staff recommendation on 1208 appears to be based largely on its association with the late Professor Oliver Radkey. We believe that the fact that a neighboring property associated with him has already been granted historic landmark status and named the “Goff‐Radkey House” should be considered by the Commission. If possible, please provide this to the Commission members prior to the meeting. Many thanks for your consideration of this supplemental information. James Cousar CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Vivien Geneser Friday, November 13, 2020 4:39 PM PAZ Preservation; Gaudette, Angela Historic Landmark Commission Meeting on November 16 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear HLC, Please allow me to speak at the meeting on November 16, 2020 in regard to the proposed demolition of my nineteenth century era home on Eleventh Street. Allow me to request a postponement of the decision by HLC. Vivien Geneser, owner of property at 815 West Eleventh Street AGAINST demo permit for 815 West Eleventh Street Thanks! Sincerely, Vivien Geneser CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Memo To: From: CC: Date: Re: Historic Landmark Commission Donna D. Carter, FAIA Square One Consultants 15 November 2020 Item D.9 HDP‐2020‐0410 Demolition of 815 W. 11th St. I am one of the owners of the property to the west of this house (817 W. 11th St) where I have had my architectural office since 1985. I am opposed to the demolition of the approximately 100 year old home at 815 W. 11th St. The immediate block is mostly businesses that have successfully adapted the sites to accommodate their office use, while retaining the historic structures and feel of the neighborhood. The sole exception on our block, even at three stories, is an unwelcome intrusion on the rhythm, scale, articulations that make up the feel of the street. Unlike 815, at least the 1980s building is towards the end of the block and allows the historic vista to remain looking south or east. I sympathize with the potential buyers, however, I would ask for a postponement to allow us to work with the applicant to come up with compromise that is acceptable to the applicant, the city and the immediate neighbors on the alley. The current development code requirements provide no leeway or incentives to keep the existing structure when compared to other requirements of the code. Our design firm has looked at several development options that provide for the +/‐ 4500 sf development that a vacant lot would allow under the current entitlements. However, options would require some accommodation for parking, impervious cover or protected trees. The current code prioritizes these issues over the …
BPG Inspection, LLC 2816 San Pedro Street Austin TX 78705 Client(s): Joseph Inspection Date: 9/15/2020 Inspector: Randal Pitts , 9911 Page 1 of 33 PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Prepared For: Cater Joseph Concerning: 2816 San Pedro Street, Austin, TX 78705 By: Randal Pitts 9911 / BPG Inspection, LLC 9/15/2020 (Address or Other Identification of Inspected Property) (Name of Client) (Name and License Number of Inspector) (Date) (Name, License Number of Sponsoring Inspector) PURPOSE, LIMITATIONS AND INSPECTOR / CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES This property inspection report may include an inspection agreement (contract), addenda, and other information related to property conditions. If any item or comment is unclear, you should ask the inspector to clarify the findings. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. This inspection is subject to the rules (“Rules”) of the Texas Real Estate Commission (“TREC”), which can be found at www.trec.texas.gov. The TREC Standards of Practice (Sections 535.227-535.233 of the Rules) are the minimum standard for inspections by TREC Licensed inspectors. An inspection addresses only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection. While there may be other parts, components or systems present, only those items specifically noted as being inspected were inspected. The inspector is NOT required to turn on decommissioned equipment, systems, utility services or apply an open flame or light a pilot to operate any appliance. The inspector is NOT required to climb over obstacles, move furnishings or stored items. The inspection report may address issues that are code-based or may refer to a particular code; however, this is NOT a code compliance inspection and does NOT verify compliance with manufacturer’s installation instructions. The inspection does NOT imply insurability or warrantability of the structure or its components. Although some safety issues may be addressed in this report, this inspection is NOT a safety/code inspection, and the inspector is NOT required to identify all potential hazards. In this report, the inspector shall indicate, by checking the appropriate boxes on the form, whether each item was inspected, not inspected, not present or deficient and explain the findings in the corresponding section in the body of the report form. The inspector must check the Deficient (D) box if a condition exists that adversely and materially affects the performance of a system or component or constitutes a hazard to life, limb or property as specified by the TREC Standards of …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION NOVEMBER 16, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2020-0419 1117 LINDEN STREET D.10 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1940 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story, roughly rectangular-plan stone-veneered frame house with Tudor Revival stylistic influences, including the “cat-slide” roof; partial-width inset porch; brick surrounds for all windows and the attic vent; variety of fenestration patterns. RESEARCH The house was built around 1940 by Marvin W. Pehl Sr. and his wife, Nobie, who lived here until around 1943. Marion W. Pehl was listed as a clerk at the Gugenheim-Goldsmith Company in the city directories, and a shipping clerk at a wholesale produce company, according to the 1940 U.S. Census. They had lived at 1802 Riverview Street prior to building this house. Marvin William Pehl Sr. died 1990; Nobie Pehl died in 1995. They are buried in Tyler, Texas. After a short period of tenancy by a renter in the mid-1940s, the house was purchased by Roy H. and Lillie Mae Gartman, who lived here until around 1954. Roy Gartman was a carpenter for Brown and Root, general building contractors; from this house, they moved to 1901 Bluebonnet Lane in South Austin. From 1954 through the end of the 1950s, the house was rented, then purchased by Charles F. and June E. Beadle. Charles F. Beadle was a native of Arkansas, who served in the U.S. Army during World War II, and was a city firefighter while living here. STAFF COMMENTS The house is beyond the bounds of any City survey to date. The applicant has information from the previous owner of the house that the stone and brick work that makes this house so distinctive was applied in a ca. 1979 remodel of the house, not within the historic period. Staff has evaluated this house for designation as a historic landmark and has determined that the house may meet the criteria for landmark designation as set forth in City Code: a. Architecture. The house is a minimal traditional house with aspects of Tudor Revival design and ornamental brick surrounds for the windows and attic vent, indicating a high degree of artistry in construction and architectural significance. However, it has been determined that the stone and brick work were not part of the original, historic architecture or character of the house. b. Historical association. The house was the home of several middle-class families over time, including a shipping clerk for a wholesale …
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Gaudette, Angela Monday, November 16, 2020 2:53 PM Gaudette, Angela FW: Park View Houses From: Dominique Levesque <dom@levesqueco.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 2:28 PM To: Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Park View Houses *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Steve, I have remodeled many many pier and beam houses over the last 15‐20 years in Crestview , Brentwood and Allandale. Most of them were post war 2 bed 1 bath houses. I see value in recreating some of these old houses to be a functional desirable place to inhabit. I enjoy it more than new houses at times. My most recent addition remodel was at 1302 Aggie lane. A pier and beam renovation is possible because you can access the plumbing and work from the underside. We can do drilled piers now which are more stable. Everything is accessible. A poorly designed concrete foundation broken in numerous places like a smashed cracker is a losing game. Such are many of the artifacts in Air Conditioned Village . I have witnessed them in person. 2505 Parkview is directly behind 2506 Twin Oaks. The water from 2505 run‐off and natural flow ran through the backyard of 2506 Twin oaks and it would end up under water during major storms. There was nothing the lady could do about it. Water in the house, french drains could not correct this issue. The house was build to low to the ground.Her slab was buckled and heaving. I've seen the same of 2602 Park View Drive, 2510 Park View Drive , 2601 as well as 2603 Parkview. All these were ACV houses. All these house were poorly designed and the foundations failed eventually. 2502 Park View is the most intact. An attempt to correct the failing foundation at 2507 Park View in 2009 has exacerbated the issues and caused the perimeter to sink and the interior to swell and cracking is abundant. We bought the house from the previous owner in full knowledge of the condition of the slab. We intended to stay here for a short time while we raised our two young kids, a three year old boy and a 9 week old boy. We will rebuild a new house that suits our long term family needs. The previous owner of 2505 Park View, Dorothy Martinez asked that we purchase her house at the same time …
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Gaudette, Angela Monday, November 16, 2020 2:53 PM Gaudette, Angela FW: Park View Houses From: Dominique Levesque <dom@levesqueco.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 2:28 PM To: Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Park View Houses *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Steve, I have remodeled many many pier and beam houses over the last 15‐20 years in Crestview , Brentwood and Allandale. Most of them were post war 2 bed 1 bath houses. I see value in recreating some of these old houses to be a functional desirable place to inhabit. I enjoy it more than new houses at times. My most recent addition remodel was at 1302 Aggie lane. A pier and beam renovation is possible because you can access the plumbing and work from the underside. We can do drilled piers now which are more stable. Everything is accessible. A poorly designed concrete foundation broken in numerous places like a smashed cracker is a losing game. Such are many of the artifacts in Air Conditioned Village . I have witnessed them in person. 2505 Parkview is directly behind 2506 Twin Oaks. The water from 2505 run‐off and natural flow ran through the backyard of 2506 Twin oaks and it would end up under water during major storms. There was nothing the lady could do about it. Water in the house, french drains could not correct this issue. The house was build to low to the ground.Her slab was buckled and heaving. I've seen the same of 2602 Park View Drive, 2510 Park View Drive , 2601 as well as 2603 Parkview. All these were ACV houses. All these house were poorly designed and the foundations failed eventually. 2502 Park View is the most intact. An attempt to correct the failing foundation at 2507 Park View in 2009 has exacerbated the issues and caused the perimeter to sink and the interior to swell and cracking is abundant. We bought the house from the previous owner in full knowledge of the condition of the slab. We intended to stay here for a short time while we raised our two young kids, a three year old boy and a 9 week old boy. We will rebuild a new house that suits our long term family needs. The previous owner of 2505 Park View, Dorothy Martinez asked that we purchase her house at the same time …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION BRIEFING NOVEMBER 16, 2020 Historic preservation is a tool to steward change. Historic preservation is a tool to steward change. Design standards provide a clear, objective way to evaluate proposed changes. WHY HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS? 1. 2. Increase equity by reducing resources required for the historic district application. Increase predictability for property owners in potential districts. 3. Take a common-sense approach to design standards by recognizing underlying principles. WHY HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS? 4. Provide clearer standards for historic landmark owners and National Register district property owners. 5. Provide an educational tool for all historic property owners. 6. Provide consistent standards for project review by commissioners and staff. 7. Follow good practices in preservation. SECRETARY’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and preserved. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RESOLUTION 20201116-2.A Seconded By: Papavasiliou Date: November 16, 2020 Subject: Historic Design Standards Motioned By: Heimsath Resolution Recommend strong support and adoption of Historic Design Standards to related boards and commissions and City Council. See attached standards. The standards are intended to: 1) provide clear, accessible guidance to people seeking to make changes to historic properties, 2) aid the Historic Landmark Commission in consistent decision-making, and 3) assist neighborhoods seeking historic district designation, especially historically underrepresented communities, by removing the requirement to create their own design standards. Description of Resolution to Council Resolution by the Historic Landmark Commission supporting Council adoption of the Historic Design Standards. Rationale: See attached resolution. Vote For: Heimsath, Papavasiliou, Featherston, Jacob, Koch, Little, McWhorter, Myers, Tollett, Valenzuela, Wright Against: None Abstain: None Absent: None Attest: _________________________________ Terri Myers Chair, Historic Landmark Commission 1 of 1 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS RESOLUTION Historic Landmark Commission Recommendation 20201116-2.A WHEREAS the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission was established in 1974 to promote historic preservation activities in Austin and advise the Austin City Council on matters related to historic preservation; and WHEREAS duties of the Historic Landmark Commission include reviewing requests to establish historic designation and making recommendations on the requests to the land use commission, providing information and counseling to owners of structures that are designated as historic structures, recommending amendments to the Code relating to historic preservation, and advising the Council on matters relating to historic preservation; and WHEREAS the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan outlines historic preservation policies for the City of Austin to preserve and interpret historic resources in Austin for residents and visitors, with goals including 1) the preservation and interpretation of historic resources; 2) the protection of historic buildings, structures, sites, places, and districts in neighborhoods throughout the city; and 3) the retention of the character of National Register and locally designated historic districts by ensuring development is compatible with the historic character of the districts; and WHEREAS the Strategic Direction 2023 includes the honoring and preservation of historical and ethnic heritage as an indicator category, with strategies that include protecting places that reflect Austin’s diverse history and broadening support for and participation in preserving underrepresented histories and resources; and WHEREAS the Historic Landmark Commission and Historic Preservation Office seek to support historic district designations, particularly in historically underrepresented Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities; and WHEREAS the Commission finds …
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission November 16, 2020 Historic Landmark Commission to be held November 16, 2020 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (November 15th by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the November 16, 2020 meeting, residents must: Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, a telephone number, and email address. Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion 16 Noviembre, 2020 La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (15 Noviembre antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los residentes deben: Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). La información requerida es el nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, y un número de teléfono o dirección de correo electrónico. Una vez que se haya llamado o enviado por correo electrónico una solicitud para hablar al enlace de la junta, los residentes recibirán un correo electrónico o una llamada telefónica con …
Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee November 2, 2020, 3:00 p.m. Version en espanol a continuacion The Architectural Review Committee meeting will be held Monday, November 2, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. with social distancing modifications. THIS MEETING IS LIMITED IN DURATION. PLEASE MAKE PRESENTATIONS AS BRIEF AS POSSIBLE (Consider 7-8 minutes) SO THAT ALL APPLICANTS MAY HAVE THE CHANCE TO PRESENT TO AND RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. Community members will be allowed to listen to the meeting via telephone but do not participate in the meeting. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. The opportunity for public input will occur at a subsequent meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. All participants (applicants and others) must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, November 1, 2020 to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions). To listen to the Architectural Review Committee meeting, community members must: If you have submitted a request, you will receive either an email or phone call on the day • Call or email the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than noon on Sunday, November 1. Provide your name and telephone number or email address. • of the meeting with the telephone number and call-in instructions. Participation in this meeting is limited to applicants and staff. • You must call in at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start in order to listen (no later than 2:45 p.m.). Late callers will not be accepted. • Applicants will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Sunday, November 1. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion: 2 Noviembre, 2020 a las tres de la tarde (3:00 p.m.) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. La oportunidad a hablar en estas causas sera a una reunion regular del Historic Landmark Commission con noticias publicas. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (1 Noviembre 2020 antes del mediodía). Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los residentes deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta …
HaileyStudio Architecture + Planning 1011 E. 5th Street #1311 Austin, Texas 78702 512.913.0396 RE: 1609 West 12th Street Proposed Work 09.21.2020 1609 W. 12th - Project Description The scope of work includes renovating the one-story existing bungalow that is 540 square feet and built in 1940. The location of this existing bungalow is at the front of the property. The work on the existing house includes replacing the decaying wood siding with “Hardie” lap siding. The scope of work also includes a two-story addition that will be 2,358 square feet and a 450 square feet carport. The location of the addition will be behind the existing house and the car port will be located behind the addition at the very rear of the property off of the alley. The materials used on the addition include “Hardie” lap siding and board and batten siding and Ipe wood siding. The new addition is designed to complement rather than imitate the existing bungalow structure. The new addition steps down the sloping topography and has a low flat roof structure which does not upstage the simple gable roofline of the bungalow. As seen from the street, the new addition has minimal visual impact. 1 EXISTING NORTH (FRONT) ELEVATION 1 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE EXISTING WEST (RIGHT) ELEVATION 2 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE EXISTING SOUTH (REAR) ELEVATION 3 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE EXISTING EAST (LEFT) ELEVATION 4 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE i o d u t S y e l i a H g n i n n a p l + e r u t c e t i h c r a t e e r t S h t 5 t s a E 1 1 0 1 i m o c . o d u t s y e l i a h @ y e l i a h t : l i a m e 2 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A . 6 9 3 0 3 1 9 2 1 5 . i m o c . o d u t s y e l i a h . w w w 1 1 3 1 # H COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The designs represented by these plans are copyrighted and are subject to copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. §101, et seq., as amended. Unauthorized use of these plans …
i o d u t S y e l i a H g n i n n a p l + e r u t c e t i h c r a t e e r t S h t 5 t s a E 1 1 0 1 i m o c . o d u t s y e l i a h @ y e l i a h t : l i a m e 2 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A . 6 9 3 0 3 1 9 2 1 5 . i m o c . o d u t s y e l i a h . w w w 1 1 3 1 # H COPYRIGHT NOTICE: The designs represented by these plans are copyrighted and are subject to copyright protection under 17 U.S.C. §101, et seq., as amended. Unauthorized use of these plans or the designs represented therein will subject the infringer to damages and/or judicial action as provided by federal law. 1609 W. 12th St. Austin, Texas Cary Paul Studios E T SI G EC E Y O R R E YA D ARC LIAH H R J I T E Y E I I I C T S T A T E 17485 TF O AS X E 09.21.2020 FOR HLC REVIEW NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT #2022 09.21.2020 HLC SUBMITTAL 10.02.2020 HLC SUPP. MATERIAL 10.02.2020 Site Plan HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL PS-1.1 1 3 5 2 3 5 3 3 5 4 3 5 N28°23'13"E 166.82' 5 3 5 6 3 5 7 3 5 2 3 5 3 3 5 4 3 5 5 3 5 7 3 5 8 3 5 9 3 5 0 4 5 S28°23'13"W 162.76' EX. HOUSE F.F.E.: 541.5' ' W " 7 4 0 0 ° 2 6 N ' 0 0 4 4 . 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" ' 6 1 4 4 . ' E " 0 4 4 4 ° 6 5 S 1 4 5 NORTH i o d u t S y e l i a H g n i n n a p l + e r u t c e t i h c r a t e e r t S h t 5 t s a E 1 1 …
EXISTING (WEST) (FROM WOODLAWN BLVD) FINISH FLOOR FOUNDATION STRUCTURE EXISTING (WEST) FOUNDATION STRUCTURE FINISH FLOOR EXISTING (WEST CONT’D) EXISTING (WEST CONT’D) ADDITION TO ORIGINAL HOUSE EXISTING (SOUTH) ADDITION TO ORIGINAL HOUSE EXISTING (SOUTH CONT’D) ADDITION TO ORIGINAL HOUSE EXISTING (EAST) EXISTING (EAST CONT’D) ADDITION TO ORIGINAL HOUSE EXISTING (NORTH - FROM BACKYARD) EXISTING (NORTH - FROM FRONT-YARD) GARAGE CONDITION OF INTERIOR WALL CONDITION OF INTERIOR WALL CONDITION OF INTERIOR WALL CONDITION OF FLOOR AT PERIMETER CONDITION OF FLOOR AT PERIMETER
SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". S 62°59'18" E 101.30' DEMO STUCCO WALL DEMO FLATWORK R14'-0" PARTIAL DEMO STONE WALL DEMO WALK DEMO FLATWORK DEMO ONE STORY RESIDENCE DEMO FLATWORK ) . . W O . R ' 5 8 ( ' 0 0 . 0 7 E " ' 0 4 0 0 6 2 ° N PARTIAL DEMO STONE CURB DEMO LOW STONE WALL K C A B T E S A O C 5 2 ' DEMO FLATWORK DEMO GARAGE 5' COA SETBACK N 63°59'20" W 106.00' TAKE CARE TO PROTECT TREE ROOTS DURING DEMO 5' COA SETBACK DEMO METAL SHED K C A B T E S A O C ' 0 1 ) ' 0 5 . 8 5 W " 2 5 9 0 ' T A L P ( ° 2 2 S W " 4 1 6 2 ' ° 1 2 S ALL DEMOLITION IN THE 1/4 AND 1/2 CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF PROTECTED TREES MUST BE DONE WITH HAND TOOLS ADDITIONAL TREE PROTECTION NOTES: DEMO SITE PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" TRUE NORTH PLAN NORTH SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". = TO BE DEMOLISHED STRUCTURE = TO BE DEMOLISHED FLATWORK LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 56 AND THE NORTH 10 FEET OF LOT 57, BLOCK 49 ENFIELD C ZONING SF-3 LOT SIZE 7,157.49 SF PROTECTED TREE NOTES: DRIP LINE CALCULATION 1'-0" PER 0'-1" OF TRUNK ALL TREES & NATURAL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF AUSTIN STANDARDS OF TREE PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMIT APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TREES WITH A DIAMETER OF 19" OR MORE. ALL EXCAVATION UNDER TREE DRIP LINE TO BE DONE BY HAND. CUT NO ROOTS WITHOUT ARBORIST CONSULTATION. 5. ALL NECESSARY PRUNING BY CERTIFIED ARBORIST. 6. 2X4 PLANKS REQUIRED AT TRUNKS WHERE 1/2 CRZ IS NOT FENCED COMPLETELY PROVIDE 8" OF MULCH AT EXPOSED CRZ TRENCHING WITHIN 1/2 CRZ TO BE AVOIDED. IF REQ'D, CERTIFIED ARBORIST TO AIRSPADE FOR TOP 30" TO AVOID CUTTING ROOTS 1 1/2" OR GREATER SITE PLAN NOTES: PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODES, REGULATIONS & ORDINANCES. SITE PLAN IS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION ON SURVEY PROVIDED …
