Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mary Reed Friday, March 19, 2021 12:22 PM Terri Myers; Myers, Terri - BC; Wright, Caroline - BC; Little, Kelly - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC; Jacob, Mathew - BC; McWhorter, Trey - BC; Featherston, Witt; Papavasiliou, Alexander - BC; Tollett, Blake - BC; Valenzuela, Sarah - BC; Heimsath, Ben - BC Brummett, Elizabeth; PAZ Preservation Objecting to demolition of 1104 Toyath and requesting a postponement of decision Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am writing to you on behalf of the Clarksville Community Development Corporation (CCDC), the neighborhood organization for historic Clarksville, www.clarksvillecdc.org. I am president of its board of directors. We oppose the request of Paradisa Homes to demolish 1104 Toyath Street (Case # HR 21‐029755) because the house contributes to the Clarksville NRHD. Also, the house that Paradisa intends to build in its place is architecturally inappropriate for Clarksville. This case is Three members of the CCDC board of directors met with Luis Zaragoza with Paradisa Homes this past Tuesday to discuss a possible way to retain the house as a contributing structure. Our conversation was positive and as a next step, one of those board members ‐‐ an architect ‐‐ will meet with several Pardisa staffers next Wednesday at the company's office. I also put Luis in touch with Elizabeth Brummett so he could find out how much of 1104 Toyath can be removed without affecting its historically contributing status. Therefore, the CCDC would like you to delay any decision on Paradisa Homes' request to demolish 1104 Toyath until after the meeting next takes place next Wednesday and we have a clearer sense of what Paradisa wants to do. Thanks for your consideration of this request. Mary Reed MR•PR Austin, TX 78703 512 657 5289 Be Kind "I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear." MLK CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
ITEM D.1.0 – 5613 Patton Ranch Road Historic Landmark Commission March 22, 2021 I. Revised Proposal from St. Andrew’s School. After numerous discussions with City historic preservation staff, community historic preservationists, and neighborhood groups, St. Andrew’s has revised its original proposal regarding the log structures at this site. Originally, St. Andrew’s had proposed (with staff support and assistance) to deconstruct the log structures and deliver them to Pioneer Farms for reconstruction and public interpretation. After discussions with Oak Hill community members and preservationists, and after thoughtful consideration by St. Andrew’s, the school has revised its proposal as follow: A. Requested HLC Action. Grant a permit that will allow: (i) partial demolition of the more recent additions to both the main structure and structures that are comprised of log construction, and (ii) the relocation of the log structure portion of the main building, the log pole barn (or smokehouse) behind the main building and the log corn crib to one of the following potential site locations, at St. Andrew’s election, both of which are near the current site and are on the original Patton Ranch: 1. School Site Option. A site on the currently undeveloped portions of the St. Andrew’s school site within a secured perimeter which will be located somewhere chosen by St. Andrew’s on Lot 2, Block A Harper’s Park Section 1; Lot 3, Block A St. Andrew’s Subdivision; or Lot 4, Block A St. Andrew’s Subdivision. 2. School Rd./ Patton Ranch Rd. Site. If St. Andrew’s determines that Option 1 above is not feasible because of the application of City of Austin regulations (e.g. CEF or creek buffers), a second option would be a site on the currently undeveloped portions of the southern portion of tract on which the structures are currently located, within a secured perimeter, and which will be located somewhere chosen by St. Andrew’s near the intersection of School Road and Patton Ranch Road. NOTE: St. Andrew’s would not be required to relocate the log structures and could choose to demolish the non-log structural portions of the main building and other non-log structures on the site and keep the remaining log structures in place. B. Additional Commitments of St. Andrew’s. If the St. Andrew’s exercises the right to relocate the log structures under the permit, it is fully committed to the following additional measures: 1. Secure and maintain the structures in an enclosed are to …
BENCHMARK ELEV = 547.74' STOP SIGN B R U C T E L N I ) ' 0 6 ( T E E R T S E G D R N E K C A R B I EAST MONROE STREET (RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES) CONCRETE WALK 548' CURB WATER METER STOP SIGN 549' 25" LYGUSTRUM 550' 1/2 CRZ E T E R C N O C K L A W S77°59'26"E (137.06') CONCRETE WALK (77sf) EXISTING PRIMARY DWELLING 1576sf FRONT PORCH 322sf ' 8 . 3 5 5 = . . E F F . GAS METER AC 9sf K C A B T E S ' 5 2 O.E. ) ' 0 0 . 6 4 ( E " 9 1 4 0 ° 2 1 N ' N77°59'26"W (137.05') 551' LOT 6304sf 15' SETBACK 552' PROPOSED ADU 945sf LANDING 9sf 1/2 CRZ 24" PECAN 553' K C A B T E S ' 5 Y A W E V R D I ) f s 0 3 ( ADDITION TO BE REMOVED AC 9sf 5' SETBACK 12'-6" ) ' 0 6 ( E U N E V A E K A R D " 0 - ' 5 1 " 0 - ' 6 2 " 0 - ' 5 U.P. NEW TYPE 1 " 0 DRIVEWAY - ' 0 (433S-1A) 1 B R U C O . E . 25'-8 1/2" 10'-2" 38'-5" 17'-9" 16'-0" 24'-0" 5'-0" 15'-0" . E . O U.P. O . E . ) ' 0 0 . 6 4 ( ' W " 0 0 5 0 ° 2 1 S 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" N A L P E T S I - I E G D R N E K C A R B 1 0 6 1 4 0 7 8 7 X T , I N T S U A N DATE: 3/16/21 1601 Brackenridge - North Elevation (View from E. Monroe Street) New dormer at rear of roof New 2nd floor window within existing trim Restore front porch Siding to match original: stucco up top, 3" reveal tear drop in middle and 8" reveal flat wood siding at bottom 1601 Brackenridge - Proposed Floorplan Front Porch Dining Room Stairs to 2nd floor Living Room Owners Closet Owners Bed Owners Bath Kitchen Tub 1st Floor Storage Closet Guest Bed Lounge Stairs Tub Bath Storage HVAC Guest …
1601 Brackenridge: Historic Review Application Proposed Scope of Work Structure 1. Foundation: Due to the age and condition of the existing foundations, replacement of the existing pier and beam foundation is required to meet existing structural requirements and codes. The new foundations will match the current footprint of the original house on all sides of the structure. The finished floor height of the 1st floor will be roughly 18” lower than the current height to allow for the proper height within the interior space and allow for us to keep the roofline at the exact same height while allowing for a habitable 2nd floor. 2. Walls: Much of the wall framing will be replaced to allow for the property replacement of the foundations and to allow for the creation of the 2nd floor habitable space within the existing roofline. The original wood will be reused wherever possible. 3. Roof: The roofline will remain at the exact same height and massing. The roof will be reframed with new joists to replace the degraded joists that are currently in use. Description of Work on the Exterior Facade 1. Front Porch: The front porch will be restored to its original condition, with openings on three sides. The windows and front door that are currently at the front of the porch will be moved back to their original location. We will build new concrete steps up to the front porch. 2. Rear Addition: We will remove the 12.5’ long addition which was added at the rear of the home and is not original. 3. Framing, Siding & Trim: The existing framing, siding, trim will be removed and examined for possible reuse. Any elements that are damaged will either be repaired or replaced with similar profile components. The walls will be reframed after the new foundation is installed to meet current structural and energy guidelines. The window trim will be repainted in a similar white color but the siding will likely be repainted using a different color than the current light blue. 4. Windows, Door and Trim: Existing windows and front door will be repaired and reused. All windows appear in good working order. If any windows are found to be non-repairable upon closer inspection, they will be replaced with matching windows. Original window trim will be reused unless damaged beyond repair. Any replacement materials will match the profile and size of the existing trim. …
PROPOSAL Restore the existing home at 1601 Brackenridge Street and add a new construction ADU at the rear of the property (17’ to the rear of the original home). PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Restore front porch. The original porch was closed in and the original front windows were moved to the front of the current porch. Will return the front porch to its original design with openings on three sides. The original brick posts on either end of the front porch are in good condition and do not appear to require restoration. 2) Demolish non-original rear addition, including the rear chimney which seems to have been added when this rear addition was added. This rear addition is 12.5’ long along the entire width of the rear of the building. 3) Build new pier and beam foundation for the entire home. The existing foundation has severe movement and is not able to properly support a home. The outside dimensions of the foundation will remain exactly as they currently are built (with the exception of the removal of the rear addition discussed in Item 1). 4) Restore windows and front door and repair original siding or replace in-kind where deteriorated beyond repair. The windows along the sides facing the street (Brackenridge Street and E. Monroe Street) will remain in the exact same location as they are currently located. Due to the severe movement of the foundation all of the windows will need to be removed and restored. Some new windows will be installed along the two other sides of the house so that they can be property sized to allow for egress as required by code from bedrooms. 5) Replace shingle roof with standing-seam metal roof. The roof height and pitch will remain the same. 6) Add a dormer at the rear roof section to roughly match the existing (believed to be original) dormer at the front roof section. This dormer will have a window in it as well. 7) Add a 2nd story space within the existing pitch of the roof. GUIDING GOALS FOR THE PROJECT The following goals apply to the proposed project: 1) Do not alter or remove historic features unless they are deteriorated beyond repair. 2) If replacing deteriorated historic features, match the original as close as possible. Historic windows and siding will be repaired, with in-kind replacement reserved for only those elements that are deteriorated beyond repair. 3) …
1904 Mountain View Rd. Austin, TX 78703 Prepared for: Zach Savage Inspector: Jeffrey K. Prokaski TREC# 9866 Phone 512-731-0513 Prokaski Home Inspections Prokaski Home Inspections, PLLC 1406 Piney Creek Lane Cedar Park, TX 78613 By: Jeffrey K. Prokaski PHI: Managing Member TREC License #9866 Phone: 512-731-0513 Inspection Date 03/10/2021 Inspection Customer Invoice CUSTOMER NAME: Zach Savage PROPERTY INSPECTED: 1904 Mountain View Rd. Austin, TX 78703 Description Amount Paid with credit card 365.00 365.00 TOTAL T h a n k y o u f o r y o u r t r u s t By: PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Prepared For: Zach Savage (Name of Client) Concerning: 1904 Mountain View Rd. Austin, TX 78703 (Address or Other Identification of Inspected Property) Jeffrey Kent Prokaski TREC #9866 (Name and License Number of Inspector) 03/10/2021 (Date) PURPOSE, LIMITATIONS AND INSPECTOR / CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES This property inspection report may include an inspection agreement (contract), addenda, and other information related to property conditions. If any item or comment is unclear, you should ask the inspector to clarify the findings. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. This inspection is subject to the rules (“Rules”) of the Texas Real Estate Commission (“TREC”), which can be found at www.trec.texas.gov. The TREC Standards of Practice (Sections 535.227-535.233 of the Rules) are the minimum standards for inspections by TREC- licensed inspectors. An inspection addresses only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection. While there may be other parts, components or systems present, only those items specifically noted as being inspected were inspected. The inspector is NOT required to turn on decommissioned equipment, systems, utility services or apply an open flame or light a pilot to operate any appliance. The inspector is NOT required to climb over obstacles, move furnishings or stored items. The inspection report may address issues that are code-based or may refer to a particular code; however, this is NOT a code compliance inspection and does NOT verify compliance with manufacturer’s installation instructions. The inspection does NOT imply insurability or warrantability of the structure or its components. Although some safety issues may be addressed in this report, this inspection is NOT a safety/code inspection, and the inspector is NOT required to identify all potential hazards. In this report, the inspector shall indicate, by checking the appropriate boxes on the form, whether each item was …
ammond, Consulting & Engineering, LLC Residential & Commercial Structural Solutions Texas Firm# 17051 email: rhammond@RDHCE.com phone: 956.367.5561 03/16/2021 On 02 March 2021, R. Derek Hammond of RDH C&E performed a site observation to view the existing single story residence located at 1904 Mountain View Drive in Austin, Texas. This report details what was encountered during the site visit, conclusions, and recommendations. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services to you. If we have erred in our understanding of the work or if you have a questions, feel free to contact me and we will be happy to adjust and resend, C/O Zach Savage Savage Homes 512.801.2488 Austin, Texas Dear Mr. Savage, Respectfully, R. Derek Hammond, PE Owner RDH C&E LLC ammond, Consulting & Engineering, LLC Residential & Commercial Structural Solutions Texas Firm# 17051 email: rhammond@RDHCE.com phone: 956.367.5561 Existing Site Conditions The existing residence was located in west Austin, east of the Colorado River. The home, according to The Travis County records indicate it was constructed in 1949. The existing structure was composed of a structural clay tile stem walls with shallow foundations below. The floor was an elevated floor composed of structural clay tile, grout and steel mesh reinforcing. The exterior walls were composed of structural clay tile on the inner wythe and brick veneer on the outer face within, and a multi wythe brick veneer façade at the courses above grade. The roof was composed of cast in place concrete and structural clay tile. Multiple penetrations had been made through the stem walls and damage was noted on more than 25% of the walls. Some molding was noted on the stem walls adjacent to the garden beds on the east end of the home. Rusting in the ladder joints was observed throughout the stem walls, and were blooming in more than 25% of the stem walls observed. Two sump pumps were located on the east and west sides, each appeared to be inoperable as water was present in each of the pits. The interior wall adjacent to the living room was heaving, and the floor adjacent to the wall was also buckling/ faulting. The crack was approximately over 1” and over 36” in length Figure 1: Stem walls (taken in crawl space) supporting clay tile floor Figure 3: Hand railing on roof, approximately 24" tall, 42" required Figure 2: Cracked stair Figure 5: Rusted/blooming ladder joints within …
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: Gretchen Otto Monday, March 22, 2021 10:37 AM PAZ Preservation; Brummett, Elizabeth; Sadowsky, Steve; Contreras, Kalan 503 E. Annie St. Demo Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Completed *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, I live near this property and received a notice about the demolition. As of now, I'm in opposition to this demo and I'm writing to request an extension on this case. As far as I know, none of the neighbors have been able to get in touch with the owners and none of us understand what is planned or why this demo is necessary. We request an opportunity to talk with the owners, especially given that this property is located in a National Register District and backs up to a Local Historic District. Thank you, Gretchen Otto Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: pascal regimbeau Monday, March 22, 2021 1:02 PM PAZ Preservation; Brummett, Elizabeth; Sadowsky, Steve; Contreras, Kalan 503 East Mary Street Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello all, We are the owners of oppose the demolition of 503 E. Annie St as we have no idea what the owners plan to build instead. Thank you for your help Sincerely Pascal Regimbeau & Sybil Reinhart CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. and wanted to write you to tell you that we do 1
March 18, 2021 Matt Sloan Owner, Wild Susan LLC RE: Case Number GF 21-015014 Comments for Consideration These comments are in relation to the demolition permit applied for on 6800 Woodrow Avenue 78757 (“First Cumberland” or “FCPC” hereafter) by Michael Tevis and/or a business interest of his (including but not limited to Intrinsic Ventures, Intrinsic Companies, and Woodrow Studios). I am the owner of a local candle business called Wild Susan and have a prior business relationship with the owner. This is a description of mine and my business’ experience with the aforementioned owner. On November 11, 2020, I responded to a posted ad for art studios for lease because my business was at the point of outgrowing my home studio and I needed a separate work space. I spoke with Mr. Tevis the same day, describing my business and what my use of a studio looks like. He responded favorably and I scheduled a walkthrough with Patrick Hill, the NAI Partners real estate broker, the following day. I described my business again to Mr. Hill, and we agreed that the space would be a good fit for my business needs. I signed the commercial lease on November 16, 2020 and began moving my production within the next few days. Within a couple weeks, I realized I needed more space for storage as 50lb boxes of wax take up a good bit of room, so I contacted Mr. Hill to lease another space in the building which was signed on December 14, 2020. On December 10, 2020, a substantial water leak occurred in a closet adjacent to my space, which damaged the protective floorboards I placed to avoid damaging the carped and forced me to dispose of them as well as some other business assets. I reported the leak and made no issue over the business property. The first (and only) time I met Mr. Tevis was on December 15, 2020 at a building-wide meeting. Prior to the meeting, Mr. Tevis commented to me that “I’m used to artists just piddling around in their studios, and you’re running a business.” Obviously, I was a bit taken aback for two reasons – one, I described in full detail in our initial discussions what I would be using the studio for, and yes, I run a business to support my family; two, if his view of artists is that they “piddle” around, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MONDAY, MARCH 22, 2021 – 6:00 PM VIA VIDEOCONFERENCING COMMISSION MEMBERS: x x x x x x Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Witt Featherston Mathew Jacob Kevin Koch Kelly Little x ab x x x Trey McWhorter Alex Papavasiliou Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright CALL TO ORDER: 6:01 PM AGENDA CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 25, 2021 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner Valenzuela seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION Presentation on the Translating Community History project. http://www.austintexas.gov/page/current-projects Presentation by Cara Bertron, Housing & Planning Department. A. A. B. Presentation on recently completed historic resource surveys: Historic Resources Survey for Old Austin Neighborhood Association (2020) Historic Building Survey Report for North Central Austin: West Campus, North University, Heritage, Bryker Woods, and North Hyde Park (2021) http://www.austintexas.gov/page/historic-survey Presentation by Andrew Rice, Housing & Planning Department. 1 C. Presentation, discussion, and possible action to seek a recommendation to City Council for the Parks and Recreation Department’s preferred design scenario for the Dougherty Arts Center Replacement Project. Presentation by Kevin Johnson, Parks & Recreation Department, and Jonathan Pearson, Studio8 Architects. MOTION: Recommend endorsement of either Option 1A or Option 1B on the basis of preservation of the historic PARD Headquarters building on a motion by Vice Chair Heimsath. Commissioner Little seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. No cases. B. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness B.1. C14H-2009-0021 – 2406 Harris Blvd. – Discussion Jackson-Novy Kelly-Hoey House Council District 9 Proposal: Construct a swimming pool and terrace, landscape modifications; remove an attic vent opening on the front of the house Applicant: Tina Contros City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Committee Feedback: Provide evidence of historic nature of proposed changes and consider another location for the proposed pool; concerns regarding the appropriateness of a pool in the front yard. Staff Recommendation: Approve the …
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Preservation Plan Committee Monday, March 15, 2021, 1 p.m. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION TO BE HELD MARCH 15, 2021 WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (Sunday, March 14, by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the March 15 Preservation Plan Committee meeting, members of the public must: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Sunday, March 14 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to committee members in advance of the meeting. Reunión Especial del Comité del Plan de la Preservación Histórica Un Comité de la Comisión de Sitios Históricos FECHA de la reunion 15 de marzo, 2021 LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (14 de marzo, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974- 1264 o preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico …
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee Monday, March 8, 2021, 3:00 PM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TO BE HELD MONDAY, MARCH 8, 2021 WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS This meeting is limited in duration. Please make presentations as brief as possible (consider 6–7 minutes) so that all applicants may have the chance to present to and receive input from the committee members. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. Community members may register for citizen communication but may not speak on specific cases on the agenda. The opportunity for public input on specific cases will occur at a subsequent meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. This meeting is not televised. Community members may also register to receive call in information and listen to the meeting via telephone. All participants must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, March 7, 2021 to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions). To listen to or participate in the Architectural Review Committee meeting, all persons must: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, March 7, 2021 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion 8 de marzo 2021 a las tres de la tarde (3:00 p.m.) LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ EL LUNES, EL 8 DE MARZO 2021 CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Esta reunion tiene una duracion limitada. Haga todas …
HAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel 2005 Hamilton Avenue - Architectural Review Committee Presentation m(ødm) HAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel markodomstudio.com 21.02.09 2005 Hamilton Avenue The Yerwood-Simoud House, locally known as 2005 Hamilton Avenue, is an existing single family residence that was built in 1939 by Dr. Charles Yerwood, and his wife Ada Marie DeBlanc Simond. The home’s interiors were remodeled in 2014, but left the unfinished attic untouched. The Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel converts the existing attic volume into a warm, useable space for the current residences. The project completely redefines the interior experience, all while being intentionally respectful to the exterior appearance of this historic home. No additions or alterations were made to the front elevation of the home. The primary focus of the remodel is the redesign of the existing attic space, within the existing roof volume. The experience of the new volume is enhanced by the additional of 6 new “Fakro” skylights. This slim model (less than 6” from shingle to top of glass) allow sunlight to wash into the new living space, enhancing the environment, and save energy by providing natural daylight. Intentional details transport the occupant to the light filled space for reading, gathering and entertaining that complement the space main house below. In this new celebrated space, located within an existing gable, an additional seating area off of the main program that is enhanced by skylights and provide comfortable space for living. intent m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 Exterior Photos_ 2005 Hamilton Avenue -front elevation would remain as is -showing all sides of roof to receive new skylights -existing circular vents would be removed and roofing would be replaced in kind m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 Existing Conditions_ Pre-existing Attic Conditions -space currently only receives natural light from singular window -existing solar tubes to be removed/repaired in kind m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 drawings - floor plans m(ødm) markodomstudio.comHAM / Hamilton Avenue Residence Remodel21.02.09 CAR 1 CAR 2 EXISTING GRAVEL K C A B T E S D R A Y K C A B ' 5 EXISTING WOOD DECK BACK YARD EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK EXISTING DRIVE EXISTING 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LINE 25'-0" EXISTING FRONT YARD SETBACK EXISTING GRAVEL WALK P E T S E U N E V A N O T L I …
MULCH TREES. DO NOT PERMIT TRAFFIC IN CRZ AREA, SET PROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND TREES. TYP.FOLLOW NOTE 6 OF TREE PROTECTION NOTES WHERE PATH CROSSES OVER 1/2 CRZ . STUCCO FENCING 5 4 7 2' - 0" 4" E U N E V A N O S R E T A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 4 ( ' 1 1 . 0 5 E " 9 4 ' 2 5 ° 1 6 S " 0 - ' 5 MULCH TREES. DO NOT PERMIT TRAFFIC IN CRZ AREA, SET PROTECTIVE FENCING AROUND TREES. TYP.FOLLOW NOTE 6 OF TREE PROTECTION NOTES WHERE PATH CROSSES OVER 1/2 CRZ . E U N E V A N O S R E T A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 4 ( ' 1 1 . 0 5 E " 9 4 ' 2 5 ° 1 6 S 23' - 7 1/4" TO MCMANSION BUILD LINE 40' - 0" RESIDENTIAL DESIGN COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SETBACK PLANE SECTION 01 HIGHPOINT OF THE ADJACENT GRADE +547' 547' - 0 3/4" HIGH POINT 01 545' - 11 1/2" ADJACENT HIGH POINT 545' - 4 3/4" HIGH POINT 02 1/2 CRZ 547 1/4 CRZ 22.5 CEDAR " 0 - ' 5 546 8 40' - 0" RESIDENTIAL DESIGN COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SETBACK PLANE SECTION 01 HIGHPOINT OF THE ADJACENT GRADE +545.4' LOT 10 S 26°24'10" W 142.74' 545 544 38' - 9 3/4" RESIDENTIAL DESIGN COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS SETBACK PLANE SECTION 01 HIGHPOINT OF THE ADJACENT GRADE +543.2' 543' - 3 7/8" HIGH POINT 03 3 4 5 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK 2 4 5 1 4 5 0 4 5 9 3 5 8 3 5 NEW POOL E C A R R E T E P A C S D N A L W E N E C A R R E T E P A C S D N A L W E N NEW HOUSE 2-STORY WOOD VENEER STUCCO FENCING 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ 25" POST OAK R 4' - 0 " T E E R T S H T 2 1 ' 8 0 . 0 5 W " 5 3 ' 9 5 ° 1 6 N NEW CARPORT NEW CONCRETE DRIVE " 4 - ' 2 1 NOTE: NEW SIDEWALK PAVERS W CONSTRUCTION STAGING LOCATION 25' - 0" BM // // K C A …
" 7 - ' 3 1 K C A B T E S 4 # N O I T R O P " 0 - ' 0 4 3 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S " 2 / 1 3 - ' 1 7 " 0 - ' 0 4 2 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S PROPOSED HVAC LOCATION " 0 - ' 0 4 1 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S PROPOSED GAS & ELEC. METER LOCATION ' 2 9 . 7 5 1 E " 5 1 6 0 ° 0 8 S ' " 2 / 1 2 - ' 7 2 E C N E F T L S I E G A N A R D I E G A N A R D I H C N E R T Y T I L I T U D E S O P O R P 7'-1" X 9 9.3' S 10°58'52" W 60.19' EXIST. STONE WALL 100 10' SETBACK N 3 O IN T H P R TI O HI G O @ P 99.7' X 9 9.7' LOT 19 BLOCK 1 X 9 9.9' 100 E G A N A R D I LINE OF EXIST. DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED 1 0 0.5'X OUTDOOR LIVING N 3 O IN T H P R TI O HI G O 100.3' @ P N 2 O IN T H P R TI O HI G O 100.6' @ P 1 0 0.6'X K C A B T E S E D S ' 5 I EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE TO REMAIN FIN. FLR. ELEV=100.02' L A N D S C A P E S T R I P PROPOSED RESIDENCE FIN. FLR. ELEV= 101.00' AVERAGE HEIGHT OF HIGHEST PITCH: 126.67' 1 0 0 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 1 K C A B T E S 4 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S E D S ' I 5 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 7 6 " 0 - ' 0 4 3 # N O I T R O P K C A B T E S X 1 0 0.1' 1 0 …
612 Highland Avenue SITE KEY PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION ITEM ON SITE TO BE DEMOLISHED PROTECTED (OR) HERITAGE TREE CRZ TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE AND CANOPY WOOD FENCE METAL FENCE OVERHEAD LINE UTILITY POLE WATER METER GAS METER GRADE POINT ELECTRIC PANEL & METER WM EM G SITE NOTES 1.) SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY OF 612 HIGHLAND AVENUE LOT XX, BLOCK XX, OLD WEST AUSTIN "XX" SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, DATED OCTOBER 11, 2019, BY "WATSON SURVEYING JOB NO. L3ROSEDALE-TP 2.) P6.) LIMIT AREAS OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL TO AREAS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT.DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF NEW STRUCTURES IN FIELD WITH ARCHITECT 3.) COORDINATE DESIGN & DETAILS WITH UTILITY COMPANY. COORDINATE LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES & PANEL LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT 4.) PROTECT TREES, ROCK OUT CROPPINGS, AND NATURAL SITE FEATURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. MINIMIZE SITE DISTURBANCE TO PROJECT LIMIT LINE. 5.) LIMIT AREAS OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL TO AREAS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. 6.) DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF NEW STRUCTURES IN FIELD WITH ARCHITECT. 7.) CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH THE TREE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN. FOLLOW TREE PROTECTION PLAN PROVIDED BY VINCENT DEBROCK CONSULTING ARBORIST 1 SITE PLAN SCALE = 1:10 (22X34) SCALE = 1:20 (11X17) PAVED ALLEYWAY 85 N 29°55'28" E 58.85' 86 (59.00') 87 88 90.6' 86 87 89 EXISTING GARAGE RAISED BED CUTTING GARDEN GARDEN SCREEN PORCH 2-STORY HOUSE FF EL=647.75' N 5 8 ° 3 8 ' 3 1 " W 1 2 1 . 1 5 ' 87 ( 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' ) 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 90.85' Y A W A E R A YARD POOL N E E R C S H C N E B L O O P E T E R C N O C D E S I A ER N O T S A E P YARD 91.35' S 5 8 ° 4 0 ' 0 8 " E 1 2 1 . 2 4 ' ( 1 2 0 . 0 0 ' ) 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 92 90.35' AREA WAY 9 3 91.35' 101 S 30°00'00" W 58.90' (59.00') HIGHLAND AVENUE (40' R.O.W.) LOT 12 BLK.B PLAN TRUE " 4 / 1 0 - ' 4 1 FRONT PORCH FRONT PORCH STAIR 9 9 0 0 1 ' 0 7 . 2 2 …
