Thank you so much for getting this on the agenda! The increase in crime we have seen around campus in the past few months is unbelievable. The residents do not feel safe and we would like to fence off the perimeter of the property to insure their safety. Attached is a site plan w/ the proposed fencing outlined. Also below are examples photos of the proposed fencing. If you have any initial feedback I am all ears. I would like to get this through HLC this month so that we can install the fence right away. Steck House is a meticulously maintained property and will remain so. We are just very concerned about crime in the area and would like to secure the premises as soon as possible. Thank you very much Steve. Cater Joseph Proposed steel picket fencing material, pickets with crushed spear tops Proposed chain link fencing materials Proposed covered entry gate example
LEFT ELEVATION 6 12 FINISH GRADE F.F. 100.0' TOP OF RIDGE .5 12 TOP WALL 109.0' H A L F S Z E : I 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 1 1 x 1 7 ) F U L L S Z E : I 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " ( 2 4 x 3 6 ) F R O N T E L E V A T O N I . F F . 1 0 0 . 0 ' I I F N S H G R A D E I I F N S H G R A D E . F F . 1 0 0 . 0 ' 6 1 2 PORCH 9'-5" CLG " 2 / 1 0 1 - ' 3 1 7'-8" 15'-9" LIVING 9'-3" CLG " 3 - ' 3 1 " 3 - ' 3 1 15'-9" 11'-5" 11'-5" DINING 9'-3" CLG " 3 - ' 3 1 " 0 - ' 4 " 1 1 - ' 2 8'-5" E V O T S " 0 1 - ' 6 1 I S N K . F E R KITCHEN 7'-11" CLG 8'-4" 7'-0" " 2 / 1 6 - ' 3 4'-5" " 2 - ' 9 BATH 9'-3" CLG " 0 - ' 5 MATERIAL PRODUCT TRADENAME MODELNUMBER " 4 - ' 3 1 BEDROOM #1 9'-3" CLG BEDROOM #2 9'-3" CLG " 4 - ' 3 1 11'-2" 12'-0" " 1 - ' 5 " 2 - ' 4 13'-8" BEDROOM #3 7'-11" CLG 13'-8" LNDRY 7'-11" CLG 7'-7" " 4 - ' 9 " 8 - ' 9 TOP OF RIDGE TOP OF RIDGE EXISTING FLOOR PLAN FULL SIZE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (24x36) HALF SIZE: 1/8" = 1'-0" (11x17) EXISTING ROOF PLAN FULL SIZE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (24x36) HALF SIZE: 1/8" = 1'-0" (11x17) 12 6 6 2 1 I E G D R F O P O T I E G D R F O P O T ' . 0 9 0 1 L L A W P O T ' . 0 9 0 1 L L A W P O T ' 0 . 0 0 1 . F F . ' . 0 0 0 1 . F F . I N O T A V E L E …
Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for September 28, 2020 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The Historic Landmark Commission meeting will be held with social distancing modifications. Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers (applicants included) must register to speak in advance no later than Sunday, September 27 by noon. All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To register, applicants and community members must: • • Email or call the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than noon on Sunday, September 27. The information required is the speaker name; item number(s) they wish to speak on; whether they are for, against, or neutral; and an email address. People who have submitted a request to speak will receive either an email or a phone call on the day of the meeting, which will provide the telephone number to call. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Sunday, September 27. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. Historic Zoning applications Item Address/description 2502 Park View Drive (HDP-2020-0214) – Commission-initiated historic zoning case (postponed A.1 August 24, 2020) A.2 A.3 2609 San Pedro Street (HDP-2020-0231) – Commission-initiated historic zoning case 2816 San Pedro Street (HDP-2020-0293) – Commission-initiated historic zoning case Historic landmark and historic district applications Item B.1 B.2 Address/description 4205 Avenue F (HR-2020-122347) – Replace a roof with standing-seam metal 4010 Avenue H (HR-2020-125242) – Construct a 2-story rear addition; remove asbestos siding; change some window openings on secondary walls; replace some windows in-kind; enlarge a window opening to a door opening 602 Highland Avenue (HR-2020-125268) – Construct a 2-story rear addition and side carport B.3 1412 Wathen Avenue (HR-2020-137070) – Replace roof with same material B.4 National Register District permit applications Item C.1 Address/description 319-323 E. 6th Street (HR-2020-107348) – Enclose a roof deck and third-story addition (postponed from August 24, 2020) 3211 Oakmont Boulevard (HR-2020-110112) – Construct a single-family residence (postponed from August 24, 2020) 3207 Glenview Avenue (HR-2020-123266) – Construct an addition, change a front window opening, and replace windows C.2 C.3 C.4 1607 Niles Road (HR-2020-127555) – Construct a detached garage 3002 Bryker Road (HR-2020-127918) – Construct …
B.1 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HR-2020-122347 4205 AVENUE F HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Reroof the building with standing-seam metal, replacing composite shingles. ARCHITECTURE 1½-story, rectangular-plan house with a combination hipped and gabled roof, gabled dormer, wood shingle cladding, and a full-width front porch. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install metal roof with 18”-wide panels and 1” standing seams. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The property is contributing to the Hyde Park Historic District. The following requirements from the historic district design standards apply to the proposed project: Residential Standards: Single Family Preservation and Restoration 3.5.1 In replacing roof materials, consider first the use of the original material, then use a product that resembles the original material… Metal roofs are also acceptable… Preserve original gable/attic vents and roof brackets. The project will not change original roof features, only the roof covering material. The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Not reviewed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the plans. LOCATION MAP B.1 - 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos B.1 - 3 Primary (west) façade of 4502 Avenue F. Source: Google Street View, February 2019.
B.2 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HR-2020-125242 4010 AVENUE H HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPOSAL Remove asbestos siding, replace all windows and window screens, demolish the rear portion of the existing house, construct a 2-story rear addition and 1-story rear covered porch, change a window opening into a door opening on the south (secondary) wall, shift window openings on the north (secondary) wall, and replace two non-historic front doors. ARCHITECTURE One-story, rectangular-plan house with a side-gabled roof, asbestos cladding, 6-over-6 wood-sash windows, and an entry portico partly covering a concrete porch. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The project has eight parts: 1) Remove asbestos siding and reuse existing wood lap siding if possible; replace with in- kind wood siding where deterioration makes reuse impossible. 2) Replace all windows with clad-wood windows with profiles that match existing. Wood screens will be replicated. 3) Demolish the rear portion of the existing house. The front 36’ of the building will be 4) retained. Construct a 2-story rear addition capped by a cross-gabled roof and clad in fiber cement siding, with 6-over-6 and 2-over-2 clad-wood windows and screens fabricated to match existing. The addition has a footprint of 660 square feet. 5) Construct a 1-story covered porch behind the addition. The 204-square-foot porch will be capped by a gabled roof and feature wood framing and screens. 6) Alter paired window openings on the south wall into a door opening with a paneled, partially glazed wood door; extend the gable roof into a shallow portico with square wood posts. 7) Shift four window openings on the north wall and patch wood siding. The new pattern will consist of paired and single windows. 8) Replace non-historic front doors with a paneled, partially glazed wood door and a paneled wood door. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW General Standards The property is contributing to the Hyde Park Historic District. The following requirements from the historic district design standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2 Retention of historic style. Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project retains the historic building’s character-defining elements, style, and features. The project meets this standard. 1.3 Avoidance of false historicism. Respect each contributing structure as an example of B.2 - 2 the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis. The …
4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Owner Overview In purchasing 4010 Avenue H we had full knowledge of its historical status and specifically engaged an architect and GC with experience restoring older, historical homes. Our intention is to restore as much as possible and ensure the house is functional not only now but for the next several decades. In evaluating the house during the planning process, it has become apparent that the condition of the windows is incredibly poor and restoring may not be a viable option. The original windows are primed wood with a weight and pulley system. The glass is single pane. The nylon ropes are either ripped or in very weak condition throughout. The frames on the outside are rotted and the glazing is failing. There is also significant wood rotting to the grilles and rail / sash. These issues are significant and apply to every window in the house. Our hope was to find a handful of windows that could be salvaged, but all of them are in the bad shape. We’re proposing replacing these original windows with double hung aluminum clad wood windows in the same design as the existing. The home’s windows are covered by screens that the we intend to replace with similar due to significant rotting. As a result of these screens being mounted in front of the windows, the glazing on the windows is always obscured when viewing from the exterior. If we match the existing window style, mullion pattern and proportions (which we intend to do), the view of the house from the street will be unchanged. View from Street with Screens Covering Window Detail Representative Example of Screen Rotting Representative Example of Window Damage 1 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Window Key 16 15 14 13 12 11 19 20 17 18 21 22 23 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 1 2 3 2 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 1 2 3 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 3 4 4 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 5 6 5 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 7 8 6 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 9 10 7 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 11 12 8 4010 Avenue H Window Supplement Gallery of All Windows 13 14 9 …
From Lindsay Shillington Via email 9/10/2020 We are proposing to replace the existing windows. The window survey (hot off the press!) is attached. Since we last spoke the owners have selected a builder, Michael Curlee. Michael had his window guy, Glenn Geydos, come take a look at the windows and make a recommendation based on their condition. Glenn's take was as follows: "Original windows are primed wood with weight and pulley systems. Glass is single pane and they are falling apart. The glass is the least efficient it can possibly be. The nylon ropes are ripped and some will need to be redone. The frames on the outside are rotted in the majority of them and the glazing is failing and falling apart. It will cost you twice what new windows will cost to repair them and thats IF you can find someone to do it. Attach those pics we took today so the Hyde Park people can see what you are looking at. I am all for saving the original windows when that is a cost effective measure. In your case it would be a mistake. There are far too many major issues with these windows. You also clearly have water issues inside the walls......." I shared photos of the windows with John Hindman at Red River Restorations to get his input on what it would take to restore them. John said the windows have been neglected and restoration would require extensive work. He mentioned the 6/6 configuration makes the windows more difficult and more expensive to restore vs. a standard 1/1. The cost would be at least 2x a replacement window and candidly the cost is not financially feasible for the owner. We would like to install aluminum clad wood windows that match the existing. We are working with a rep to find a window that has the same sash, mullion & muntin dimensions and is in our budget. We are having the wood screens rebuilt. Both the glazing and the surface of the window are obscured by the screens. Because we will be diligent about matching the existing window profile, the view from the street will remain unchanged.
Historic Review Application For Office Use Only Date of Submission:__________________________ Plan Review #: ______________________________ Property Address: _____________________________________________________________________ Historic Landmark Historic District (Local) National Register Historic District Historic Landmark or Historic District Name:______________________________________________________________________________________________ Applicant Name: _______________________________ Phone #: ______________________ Email: ______________________________ Applicant Address: _______________________________ City: _______________________ __ State: ________________ Zip: __________ Please describe all proposed exterior work with location and materials. If you need more space, attach an additional sheet. PROPOSED WORK LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) 1) 2) 3) Submittal Requirements 1. One set of dimensioned building plans. Plans must: a) specify materials and finishes to be used, and b) show existing and proposed conditions for alterations and additions. Site Plan Elevations Floor Plan Roof Plan 2. Color photographs of building and site: Elevation(s) proposed to be modified Detailed view of each area proposed to be modified Any changes to these plans must be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Office and/or Historic Landmark Commission. Applicant Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ONE LOT IN FROM W 6TH STREET WITH A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH AND REAR, AND A SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. PROPERTY WAS CONDO'D INTO A FRONT AND REAR UNIT. UNIT 1 REPRESENTS SUBJECT PROPERTY. UNIT 2 IS A FUTURE CONSTRUCTION NOT YET PERMITTED. SHADED AREA REPRESENTS EXISTING OR PERMITTED CONDITION FUTURE UNIT 2 EXISTING FOOTPRINT . m o c t i a r t n g s e d w w w i . | 3 7 0 0 2 4 5 2 1 5 (cid:67)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:69)(cid:78)(cid:84) (cid:65)(cid:82)(cid:67)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:84)(cid:69)(cid:67)(cid:84) (cid:83)(cid:84)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:67)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:65)(cid:76)(cid:32)(cid:69)(cid:78)(cid:71)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:69)(cid:69)(cid:82) SHADED AREA REPRESENTS EXISTING OR PERMITTED CONDITION COVER SHEET A0.0 . m o c t i a r t n g s e d w w w i . | 3 7 0 0 2 4 5 2 1 5 COVER SHEET A0.0 Partial west elevation (rear) portion of wall and roof to be demolished Partial west elevation (rear) Partial south elevation portion of eave and roof to be demolished Partial south elevation August 21, 2020 602 Highland Ave. Demolition photos
C.2 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICTS HR-2020-110112 3211 OAKMONT BOULEVARD OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT PROPOSAL Construct a 2½-story single-family house. The Commission previously approved demolition of the existing building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 2½-story irregular-plan house clad in fiber cement siding and capped with a cross-gabled standing-seam roof with a second-story front gable. A shallow hipped roof covers the perimeter of the first floor, including a front porch and carport. An integral garage with a roll-up wood door is set back from the front wall of the house and capped with a gable roof. The house features single and paired fixed and casement clad-wood windows with true divided lites, a multi-lite fully glazed front door, an exterior brick chimney, and wood posts supporting the carport and porch. The first-floor windows and door are capped by transoms. The gable ends are clad in wood shingles. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The house is differentiated from nearby historic buildings. Its horizontal proportions, roof form, and materials are compatible with the district; the complex massing and window openings could be more compatible with the simple forms and fenestration found in nearby contributing properties. The project somewhat meets this standard. 10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. If the house were removed in the future, the historic district would be unimpaired. The proposed project somewhat meets the standards. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not reviewed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans. The applicant has revised the plans in keeping with the Commission’s recommendation to simplify the primary façade and introduce a more horizontal emphasis. LOCATION MAP C.2 - 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.2 - 3 Nearby properties on the 3200 block of Oakmont Boulevard. Note low-pitched roofs and simple massing. Source: Google Street View, …
C.4 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICTS HR-2020-127555 1607 NILES ROAD OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT PROPOSAL Construct a detached garage. No changes are proposed to the principal building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1-story rectangular-plan garage capped by a side-gabled roof covered in wood shingles, clad in wood shingles, and featuring paired folding wood doors facing Woodlawn Boulevard and a sliding wood door facing the interior of the property. One multi-lite casement steel-sash window is located in each gable end. The building has a footprint of 600 square feet and will connect to the principal building with a shallow-pitched steel roof. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 9) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The building is compatible with the principal building on the property through its side-gabled roof form. Its size, subordinate position, uncomplicated massing, and shingle cladding differentiate it as new construction. The project could be more compatible through its materials, which are not related to or particularly compatible with the stucco-clad house. It somewhat meets this standard. 10) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. If the new building were removed in the future, the historic district would be unimpaired. The proposed new building somewhat meets the standards. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Not reviewed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans, with the advisory recommendation that the materials be changed to be more in keeping with the character of the historic house. LOCATION MAP C.4 - 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.4 - 3 South (rear) elevation of 1607 Niles Road, from Woodlawn Boulevard, showing proposed garage site. Source: City of Austin, August 2017. Primary façade. Source: City of Austin, August 2017. C.4 - 4 West elevation of house. The proposed garage will be located at the right side of the photo. Source: City of Austin, August 2017.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 HR-20-127918 3002 BRYKER DRIVE C.5 - 1 PROPOSAL OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT Construct a second-story addition to a single-story ca. 1941 contributing house. Demolish noncontributing detached garage. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish detached garage and deck. 2) Modify existing roofline to create higher ridgeline. 3) Construct a two-story addition at rear of house. The proposed addition is clad in fiber cement siding. It features vinyl windows and a cross-gabled roof with composition shingles. The fenestration pattern is irregular throughout, with fixed, casement, slider, and double-hung windows with two, six, or eight lights. 4) Remove existing front porch and reconstruct with smaller footprint. 5) Replace existing vinyl windows with multilight double-hung and casement windows. RESEARCH The house at 3002 Bryker Drive was built in 1941 by W. D. Anderson. Its sole owner until at least 1959 was Cicely Goff, a mathematics teacher and department head at McCallum and Austin High School. Goff’s brother, Edwin H. Goff, lived with his sister during 1963; she also hosted fellow educators as tenants during the 1940s. Goff was teaching full-time by at least 1918. In the 1940s, she acted as Austin High’s mathematics department chair and served as a leader of the Victory Corps, a program meant to prepare students for wartime and military service in the wake of the Pearl Harbor bombing. In 1966, Goff married her first cousin, agricultural engineer Moulton Babcock Goff, at the age of 77. Goff died in 1978 in Riverside, California. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate new construction projects in National Register historic districts. Applicable standards include: 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. The proposed addition will have a minor impact on existing historic materials. Original windows on historic house have already been replaced with vinyl. The porch reconstruction will alter original fabric at main façade, but it will not significantly impact the view from the street. The roof modification will alter the original ridgeline. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, …
3002 Bryker Dr. Austin, TX 78703 Partial Demolition photos FIGURE 1 – VIEW FROM FRONT, EAST ELEVATION FIGURE 2 – VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST ELEVATION (SHOWING GARAGE AT REAR) PORCH TO BE RECONSTRUCTED W/ SMALLER FOOTPRINT FIGURE 3 – VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST ELEVATION REMOVE DETACHED GARAGE VINYL WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED IN EXISTING MASONRY OPENING FIGURE 4 –SOUTH ELEVATION PORCH TO BE RECONSTRUCTED IN SIMILAR STYLE W/ SMALLER FOOTPRINT FIGURE 5 –WEST ELEVATION ROOF TO BE MODIFIED, RE: ELEVATIONS SHED ROOF, WINDOWS & SHED ROO SIDING TO BE REMOVED FOR ADDITION, RE: ELEVATIONS GABLE ROOF TO BE REMOVED, RE: ELEVATIONS FIGURE 6 – WEST ELEVATION T ELEVATION FIGURE 8 – NORTH ELEVATION VINYL WINDOW TO BE REPLACED IN EXISTING MASONRY OPENING FIGURE 7 – DETACHED GARAGE & DECK, TO BE REMOVED IN THEIR ENTIRETY ROOFLINE TO BE MODIFIED, RE: ELEVATIONS
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 NRD-2020-0030 2525 HARTFORD RD. OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT C.6 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1950 house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS There are currently no plans for redevelopment. RESEARCH The house at 2525 Hartford Rd. was built in 1950 for George and Mary Williams. George Williams, an engineer, was killed in a car accident in 1958; Mary continued to live in the house until at least a year later, when she sold it to the Pfennig family. Robert W. Pfennig worked for the IRS; his wife, a nurses’ aide, served at the Red Cross. STAFF COMMENTS The house is contributing to the Old West Austin National Register Historic District. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two historic designation criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2- 352). The property may demonstrate significance according to City Code: a. Architecture. The building is constructed with Ranch-style influences. b. Historical association. There do not appear to be significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The building was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The building does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP C.6 - 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.6 - 3 Source: Realtor.com, 2020 C.6 - 4 Occupancy History City Directory Research, 2020 Note: Due to facility closure, post-1959 research is unavailable. 1959 1955 1952 Mrs. Mary D. Williams, owner (wid. G. Davis) George D. and Mary Williams, owners Consultant engineer George D. and Mary Williams, owners Consultant engineer Biographical Information The Austin Statesman: Oct 15, 1958 C.6 - 5 The Austin Statesman: Jul 23, 1954 and Dec 19, 1957 The Austin Statesman: Sep 25, 1958 C.6- 6 The Austin Statesman: Oct 17, 1962 Permits Building permit, 6-15-50 C.6 - 7 Accessory building permit, 7-29-70 Remodel permit, 9-8-70 Water tap …
