I, Jannette S. Goodall, City Clerk of the City of Austin, Texas, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument is a true and correct copy of an ORDER of the Building and Standards Commission of the City of Austin, Texas, issued on March 24,2021, relating to Case No. CL-2021-002321, consisting of three pages, as on file in the Office of the City WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of Austin at Austin, Texas, this 1 St A 1 0 JANNETTE@>. GOODALL CITY CLERK CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § Clerk the 1 St day ofApril 2021. day ofApril, 2021. .e?-F AU- 00· 0.74: ...... k E . . .A . . . . ,E / V. A ·.,6<1 l/1 S OU .. '?£&¢,f'*&..t. . Case No. CL-2021-002321 In the Matter of 909 Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701 OCC RECEIVED AT APR 1 '21 PM3:13 Before the Building and Standards Commission of the City of Austin, Texas State of Texas County of Travis ORDER OF THE BUILDING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS On March 24, 2021, under the authority of Chapters 54 and 214 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Building and Standards Commission ("Commission") of the City of Austin, Texas, considered 909 Congress Avenue, ("the Property ) and took action as described below. 5, A. ORDER The Commission orders the following: 1. The Commission ORDERS that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for this property be adopted. 2. The Commission ORDERS that the owner of record complete the following within ninety (90) days from the date the Order is mailed to the owner of record: a. obtain and finalize all necessary permits in accordance with the requirements for historic structures, including approval from the Historic Landmark Commission, if necessary; b. correct the cited violations by completing all repairs to the structure; c. request inspection(s) from Austin Code to verify compliance; and 3. The Commission ORDERS that on the ninety-first (91st) day, if the repairs as required by this order are not complete, assess a civil penalty of $1,000 per week that will continue to accrue until the Code Official determines that the repairs required by this order are complete. shall accrue at a rate of 10 percent per year from the date of the assessment until paid in full. Interest 1 1 VALIDITY …
OT 44 8% / THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § Clerk the 1 St day ofApril 2021. day ofApril, 2021. 40,f..'19?€?pp..,? . *j e ..... ........ 0 ...9 I, Jannette S. Goodall, City Clerk of the City of Austin, Texas, do hereby certify that the foregoing instrument is a true and correct copy of an ORDER of the Building and Standards Commission of the City of Austin, Texas, issued on March 24,2021, relating to Case No. CL-2021-002327, consisting of four pages, as on file in the Office of the City WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of Austin at Austin, Texas, this 1 St dIj -0 -1 J»INETTE S. GOODALL CITY CLERK CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS fpv- Case No. CL-2021-002327 In the Matter of 911 Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701 € State of Texas County of Travis OCC RECEIVED AT APR 1 '21 PM3:14 Before the Building and Standards Commission of the City of Austin, Texas ORDER OF THE BUILDING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS On March 24, 2021, under the authority of Chapters 54 and 214 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Building and Standards Commission ("Commission") of the City of Austin, Texas, considered 911 Congress Avenue, ("the Property") and took action as described below. A. ORDER The Commission orders the following: 1. The Commission ORDERS that the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law for this property be adopted. 2. The Commission ORDERS that the owner of record complete the following within ninety (90) days from the date the Order is mailed to the owner of record: a. obtain and finalize all necessary permits in accordance with the requirements for historic structures, including approval from the Historic Landmark Commission, if necessary; b. correct the cited violations by completing all repairs to the structure; c. request inspection(s) from Austin Code to verify compliance; and 3. The Commission ORDERS that on the ninety-first (9 lst) day, if the repairs as required by this order are not complete, assess a civil penalty of $1,000 per week that will continue to accrue until the Code Official determines that the repairs required by this order are complete. shall accrue at a rate of 10 percent per Year from the date of the assessment until paid in full. Interest VALIDITY OF ORDER NOT AFFECTED BY TRANSFER: When a Commission order has been filed …
907, 909 & 911 Congress Avenue Cited Structural Violations CL 2021-002304 - 907 Congress Avenue (aka Grandberry Building) §304.3 §304.5 §304.7 §304.6 §308.1 §604.2 §304.7 §304.5 Premises Identification: Building has no visible address numbers, as required by Fire Code Foundation Walls: Foundation walls have cracks & openings which will not prevent the entry of rodents and other pests Roofs & Drainage: Roofing is damaged and requires repair Exterior Walls: Walls have holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; lacks weatherproofing & proper surface coating where required to prevent deterioration §304.13.1 Window, Skylight & Door Frames: Broken and/or missing windows require repair Accumulation of Rubbish or Garbage: Remove all trash and debris from property area Electrical: Building does not have safe & adequate electrical service CL 2021-002321 - 909 Congress Avenue (aka Mitchell-Robertson Building) Roofs & Drainage: Repair damaged roof and flashing and bring structure up to City Code Foundation Walls: Foundation walls have cracks & openings which will not prevent the entry of rodents and other pests §304.1.1 Unsafe Conditions: Repair exterior walls. §304.2 Protective Treatment: Repair exterior window and door frames. §304.6 Exterior Walls: Walls have holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; lacks weatherproofing & proper surface coating where required to prevent deterioration CL 2021-002327 - 911 Congress Avenue §304.1.1 Unsafe Conditions: Repair exterior walls, windows and bring building up to City Code. §304.2 §304.5 §304.6 §304.9 Protective Treatment: Repair exterior surfaces and bring structure to Code. Foundation Walls: Repair surface walls and bring property up to Code. Exterior Walls: Repair exterior walls. Overhang Extensions: Repair all overhanging extensions and wall surfaces. §304.13.1 Windows, Skylights and Doorframes: Repair all windows and window frames. §304.15 §304.18 Doors: Repair exterior doors, hardware and maintain property. Building Security: Repair all windows and doors and secure property. §304.18.1 Doors: Repair all doors. §304.18.2 Windows: Repair all windows.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 C14H-1981-0018 KENNEY HOUSE 611 W. 22ND STREET B.10 - 1 PROPOSAL Install signs for a new coffee house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Install a sign containing the company logo and the words “Pick Up” crafted from aluminum channel letters on the fascia of the balcony on the north and east elevation of the house. These signs will be illuminated by an external source above the channel letters and logo. Each logo will be 1’-6” in diameter. Letters will be slightly smaller. 2) Install a monument sign on the northeast corner of the property. This sign will be externally illuminated and will rest on a stone base. The actual sign will be 4’-8” tall and 3’-6” wide. 3) Install vinyl company-associated signs in the windows on the north and east elevations of the house. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW SIZE II. The City of Austin’s Sign Standards control the type and number of signs proposed at historic landmarks: I. FLUSH-MOUNTED SIGNS SIGN TYPES A. A flush-mounted wall sign is one that is mounted flat to the wall. LOCATION Locate a flush-mounted wall sign just above the display window. Do not locate a flush-mounted wall sign above second-floor windows. When feasible, place a wall sign such that it aligns with others in the block. When planning a wall sign, determine if decorative moldings exist that could define a “sign panel.” If so, locate flush-mounted signs such that they fit within panels formed by moldings or transom panels on the façade. In no case should a sign obscure significant façade features. INAPPROPRIATE SIGN TYPES In general, the maximum wall sign area on a building should not exceed 7% of the overall façade area; in some cases, however, the Commission may consider approving a maximum of 10%, if overall compatibility with the District is demonstrated. The maximum height of an individual flush-mounted sign shall be 2 feet. NUMBER OF SIGNS Only one flush-mounted sign shall be allowed for each distinct façade module. Signs that are out of character with those seen historically, and that would alter the historic character of the street. Free-standing signs, either pole-mounted or monument types. Animated signs. Sandwich (or menu) boards that stand on the sidewalk are generally discouraged. Any sign that visually overpowers the building or …
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: John Stoddard <john@jwstoddard.com> Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:45 PM Brummett, Elizabeth Civins, Conor; CleanTag Permits Re: Architectural Review Committee meeting scheduled for Monday, May 10th at 2:00 PM Hi Elizabeth, Thank you for the phone call and additional feedback last week. I will need a little more time to develop the second level. Let's postpone until June. What date will you need the revised drawings by? Thank you, John John Stoddard PRINCIPAL, JOHN WEST STODDARD, INC. 512.987.4271 john@jwstoddard.com www.jwstoddard.com The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof. Thank you. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:56 PM Brummett, Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Brummett@austintexas.gov> wrote: Thanks for talking with me last week. I wanted to check in and see how the updates are coming. Do you anticipate being able to send a revised drawing set tomorrow, or is a postponement to June in order to allow more time? Hi, John and Conor, Thank you, Elizabeth 1
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-039343 SMOOT/TERRACE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 612 HIGHLAND AVENUE B.3 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a 1-story house with a lower level and partial basement; renovate the existing garage. The proposed project is a 1-story house clad in horizontal hardiplank siding and capped by a combination hipped and flat roof covered in standing-seam metal. Features include a shed-roofed front dormer, full-height fixed and casement steel-sash windows, a fully glazed steel-frame front door, and a stucco chimney. Concrete steps provide access to a full-width, 11’ deep front porch with a low stucco wall, vertical metal railings, and flat metal roof with wood soffit. A screened porch on the south is capped by a low-pitched roof and set back 51’ from the front wall. A lower-level opening to the rear of the property is minimally visible from the street. An existing detached garage is proposed to be renovated. Changes include replacement of horizontal wood siding with board and batten hardiplank siding, replacement of the garage doors, and in-kind replacement of the roof covering. The garage is accessed by the rear alley and not visible from Highland Avenue. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Smoot/Terrace Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. New construction shall have the same street orientation and distance from adjacent buildings as the contributing buildings in the same block. The building sits on the previous historic building’s footprint (destroyed by fire), with the same orientation and distance as contributing buildings on the block. The project meets this standard. 2. Setbacks for new construction shall be consistent with setbacks of the district’s contributing houses. The building’s setback aligns with the adjacent contributing building on the south. The project meets this standard. 4. Design new buildings so that they are compatible with, but differentiated from, historic buildings in the district. The building’s scale and massing are compatible with nearby historic buildings. Elements such as the hipped roof form, dormer window, and full-width front porch present a modern take on historic architecture found elsewhere in the district. The triple banks of windows on the front wall and in the dormer reference window patterns in nearby historic buildings, with more vertical proportions that are compatible with the modern style and steeper roof pitch. The horizontal siding and porch railing reference cladding and porch …
SITE KEY PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION ITEM ON SITE TO BE DEMOLISHED PROTECTED (OR) HERITAGE TREE CRZ TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE AND CANOPY WOOD FENCE METAL FENCE OVERHEAD LINE UTILITY POLE WATER METER GAS METER GRADE POINT ELECTRIC PANEL & METER WM EM G SITE NOTES 1.) SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY OF 612 HIGHLAND AVENUE LOT XX, BLOCK XX, OLD WEST AUSTIN "XX" SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, DATED OCTOBER 11, 2019, BY "WATSON SURVEYING JOB NO. L3ROSEDALE-TP 2.) P6.) LIMIT AREAS OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL TO AREAS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT.DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF NEW STRUCTURES IN FIELD WITH ARCHITECT 3.) COORDINATE DESIGN & DETAILS WITH UTILITY COMPANY. COORDINATE LOCATION OF UTILITY LINES & PANEL LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT 4.) PROTECT TREES, ROCK OUT CROPPINGS, AND NATURAL SITE FEATURES DURING CONSTRUCTION. MINIMIZE SITE DISTURBANCE TO PROJECT LIMIT LINE. 5.) LIMIT AREAS OF STOCKPILED MATERIAL TO AREAS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. 6.) DETERMINE EXACT LOCATION OF NEW STRUCTURES IN FIELD WITH ARCHITECT. 7.) CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH THE TREE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN. FOLLOW TREE PROTECTION PLAN PROVIDED BY VINCENT DEBROCK CONSULTING ARBORIST REVISIONS LOT ZONING TOTAL LOT SIZE BUILDING COVER CALCULATIONS PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE CONDITIONED FIRST FLOOR ROOF OVERHANG (BEYOND 2') ENTRY COVERED PORCH GARAGE TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 39% TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE ALLOWED @ 40% IMPERVIOUS COVER CALCULATIONS TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE GROTTO STAIR SITE WALLS ENTRY STEPS GARAGE STEPS AC CONCRETE PAD POOL SURROUND TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVER @ 44.9% IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWED @ 45% FLOOR AREA RATIO CALCULATIONS (FAR) 1ST FLOOR (EXCLUDING PORCHES) (FAR) LOWER FLOOR GARAGE (412 SF - 450 SF EXEMPTION) BASEMENT (729 SF EXEMPTED) (FAR) TOTAL (PROPOSED) @ 40% (FAR) TOTAL ALLOWED @ 40% SF-3-NP 7066 SF 0 1513 SF 491 SF 340 SF 412 SF 2756 SF 2826 SF 2756 SF 40 SF 225 SF 37 SF 40 SF 18 SF 62 SF 3178 SF 3180 SF 1513 SF 1312 SF 0 SF 0 SF 2825 SF 2826 SF TABLE OF CONTENTS SP1: SITE PLAN A1.0v: VISITABILITY PLANS A1.0: FLOOR PLAN A1.1: SECOND FLOOR PLAN A1.2: GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS, DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES A1.3: GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS, DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULES A2.0: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.0: BUILDING SECTIONS A4.0: WALL SECTIONS & SECTION DETAILS A5.0: DETAILS A5.1: DETAILS A5.2: DETAILS A5.3: WINDOW & DOOR DETAILS A5.4: STAIR DETAILS A6.0-A6.1: INTERIOR ELEVATIONS MEP1: ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING PLAN S0.0: STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES S1.0: FOUNDATION PLAN S1.1: …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 C14H-1975-0003; HR-2021-053747 LINDEMANN HOUSE 1100 E. 8TH ST. B.4 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct perimeter brick retaining walls with metal fencing. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct brick retaining walls along the E. 8th St. and Waller St. sides of the property. The walls will be in two tiers, each a maximum of 3’ high, with a planting bed between. The brick, which will match an existing planter at the rear of the property, is close in appearance to the brick of the house. See image, below. 2) Along the upper wall will be 3’-high decorative metal fencing to match an existing gate at the rear of the property. The gate has metal pickets with arches and finials. ARCHITECTURE Constructed ca. 1887, the Lindemann House is a 1 ½-story Folk Victorian house built of Austin common brick. The house has a side-gabled roof with a centered, front-facing gable. The full-width porch has a jigsawn balustrade between six square columns with chamfered corners, decorative trim, and jigsawn brackets. Windows are 2:2 double-hung wood within segmental arched openings. The house sits on a considerable rise above E. 8th and Waller streets. A raised lawn surrounding the house is reached by steps from the corner and side street, with decorative metal gates and railings. Between, dense primrose jasmine grows along the slope out to the curb line, with no sidewalk. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Sites and streetscapes The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.1 Do not grade, fill, or excavate unless it is to solve a drainage or flooding problem. The project will leave the upper lawn around the house at the same level. The brick retaining walls will provide a more durable and permanent solution for the significant slope between the lawn and street levels. The design also will have a greater sense of openness than the current dense plantings. 2.4 If constructing a new street-side fence or site wall, design it so that the materials, style, and scale are compatible with and differentiated from the architectural style and period of the building and are in keeping with historic fence styles and heights in the historic district. a. New front fences must be …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 C14H-2009-0021 JACKSON-NOVY-KELLY-HOEY HOUSE 2406 HARRIS BLVD. B.5 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a swimming pool and perimeter fence. Note that the design of these elements has been revised, following denial of a certificate of appropriateness for a pool at the March 22, 2021 Historic Landmark Commission meeting. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a pool in front yard, fully integrated into the slope of the site and without a raised edge. Surrounding the pool will be a limestone patio in an area where a limestone patio already exists. The pool will be to the south end of the lot, largely offset from the façade of the house. Pool equipment will be located near the south property line, recessed further than the rear of the one-story side porch of the house. 2) Construct a transparent fence at the perimeter of the property. The fence will be either iron pickets with iron posts, similar to the fence at the Governor’s Mansion but of lesser height, or iron pickets between masonry piers, similar to the open fencing and limestone piers at the Fred and Margaret Sharp House (not the solid wall; see description and photo, below). The applicant welcomes the Commission’s direction regarding the design. ARCHITECTURE Two-story, cross-gabled Tudor Revival house with brick cladding and half-timbering and stucco in the front-facing gable end. The house was designated for its architecture and historic associations. The site was not mentioned in the landmark nomination; it is significant as the setting of the landmark house and not in its own right. The front yard is substantial, with a 96’ setback from the curb to the front of the house. The house also sits at a noticeable rise from Harris Blvd., with the first-floor level 84” above the street. The primary character-defining features of the site are this subtly bermed topography and the central steps aligned with the front entrance. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces and spatial relationships. The property will continue to be used as a private residence. The proposed location of …
(cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION (cid:10) Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to do so. This meeting (cid:10) will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call (cid:10) the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or (cid:10) environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. (cid:10) During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application' 's hearing to a later date, or recommend (cid:10) approval or denial of the application (cid:10) If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or (cid:10) continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required (cid:10) A board or commission' 's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a (cid:10) person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to (cid:10) appeal the decision (cid:10) interest to a board or commission by (cid:10) An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an (cid:10) delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues (cid:10) of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or (cid:10) appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: (cid:10) occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property …
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION (cid:10) Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to do so. This meeting (cid:10) will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call (cid:10) the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or (cid:10) environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. (cid:10) During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application' 's hearing to a later date, or recommend (cid:10) approval or denial of the application (cid:10) If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or (cid:10) continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required (cid:10) A board or commission' 's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a (cid:10) person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to (cid:10) appeal the decision (cid:10) interest to a board or commission by (cid:10) An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an (cid:10) delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues (cid:10) of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or (cid:10) appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: (cid:10) occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; (cid:10) is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or (cid:10) is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within (cid:10) 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development. (cid:10) A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal (cid:10) form may be available from the responsible department. (cid:10) For additional information on the City of Austin' 's land development process, please visit our website …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-067051 1805 E. 3RD STREET HERRERA HOUSE B.6 – 1 Replace the front doors and paint the historic house; construct a 2-story rear addition. Previous restoration work was approved administratively. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project involves six parts: ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Repair and Alterations 1) Replace the non-historic front doors with 2-over-2 glazed doors. 2) Replace the metal roof with composition shingles with a wood-shake profile. 3) Paint the house to match the historic color (yellow). 4) Reconstruct the rear (south) wall after it was removed beyond the scope of approvals. The proposed new wall includes a 3-panel fully glazed sliding door and a window opening with a 2-over-2 window (sash material pending). 5) Construct a 4’3” deep concrete patio behind the rear (south) wall of the historic house. 6) Construct a 2-story rear addition. The addition is set back approximately 24’ from the front wall and has a footprint of 265 square feet. It is clad in horizontal hardiplank siding and capped by a front-gabled roof, with a slope and eave depth matching those of the historic house. Windows are sliding and fixed vinyl-sash. A garage on the ground floor is accessed by a glazed roll-up door on the rear (south) wall. One-story, L-plan, cross-gabled building; vertical board-and-batten siding; 4:4 wood-sash windows; shed porch with two entry doors; National Folk style. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: General Standards 1.1 Do not remove intact historic material from the exterior of a building. 1.2 Always attempt repair first. Replacement should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary, and for the smallest area possible. 1.3 When historic material must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, replacement material should look the same, perform reliably within the existing construction, and, in most cases, be made of the same material. The proposed project repairs and retains historic wood siding, windows, and trim. Where replacement of boards or battens is necessary due to deterioration, replacements will match historic materials and profiles. The project meets these standards. 1.4 Do not attempt to re-create an architectural detail or element without proof that it existed on the building historically. The proposed project replaces plain wood porch posts with …
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maximum ADU area 953.7 ADU allowed? ADU proposed? Project ADU area Difference ADU L2 area Max ADU L2 area Difference Yes No 0 -953.7 0 550 -550 Total Remodeled Floor Area (SF) (work within existing habitable square footage) G002 General Notes G003 Standard Details G004 Standard Details G005 Standard Details G006 Environmental Details G007 Door Schedules G008 Window Schedules A000 Site Plan A101 Floor Plans, Level 01 A102 Floor Plans, Level 02 A104 Roof Plans A105 MEP Plans, Level 01 A106 MEP Plans, Level 02 A201 Elevations, Bldg 1 A202 Elevations, Bldg 1 A203 Elevations, Bldg 1 A204 Elevations, Bldg 1 PROJECT CALCULATION AND APPLICATION SHEET FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF AUSTIN (REFERENCE A000 FOR SITE PLAN) PROPERTY INFORMATION (p1 of application) SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (p2 of application) Address Tax Parcel ID Legal Description Zoning District Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (FT) Historic District REQUIRED REVIEWS 1805 E 3rd St 78702 #191991 Lot 3 Blk 2 Cypher Subdivision SF-3-NP/SF-3-H-NP 6358 45.94 N/A Area Description 1st floor conditioned (enclosed) area 2nd floor conditioned (enclosed) area 3rd floor conditioned (enclosed) area (including attics) Yes/No Covered parking (garage or carport, attached or detached) Neighborhood Planning Area East Cesar Chavez Basements Existing SF to remain New or Added SF Total SF Remodeled SF Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Total ADU GROSS FLOOR AREA (PER COA DSD, CALCULATED PER LDC 25-1- 21, [46]. AREAS w/ CEILING HEIGHTS BTWN 5' AND 6' NOT COUNTED.) TABLE OF CONTENTS G001 Cover Sheet/Project Calculations Is project participating in SMART Housing? Does project have Green Building requirement? Is site within an Airport Overlay Zone? Does this site have a septic system? Does the structure exceed 3,600 total under roof? Is this property within 200 feet of a hazardous pipeline? Is this siite located within an Erosion Hazard Zone? Is this property within 100 feet of the 100-year floodplain? Are there trees 19" or greater in diameter on/adjacent to the property? ---> If yes, how many? ---> Was there a pre-development consultation for the Tree Review? Root zone Canopy Removal Uncertain ---> Proposed impacts to trees Is this site in the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 2021-058680 PR HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4006 1/2 AVENUE B B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story rear addition to a one-story contributing building. Replace existing windows and doors. 1) Partially demolish rear of residence. 2) Construct a two-story addition. The proposed addition is set back approximately 15’ from the front wall of the house. It has a compound gabled roof with shed dormers at secondary elevations. It is clad in horizontal wood siding. Single and paired 1:1 wood windows are regularly spaced throughout. The addition’s eaves feature exposed rafter tails and brackets to mimic existing. 3) Replace windows with 1:1s. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The existing building is a one-story Craftsman bungalow with horizontal wood siding, 4:6 paired and single windows, a partial-width porch supported by tapered columns, and a gabled roof with exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces at eaves. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2: Retention of Historic Style. Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism. Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing or Potentially Contributing Structures. Preserve the historic fabric: Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. The proposed addition retains some aspects of the building’s historic style but changes its scale. It is differentiated in scale and placement but includes exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces that may not be appropriate for new construction. The proposed cladding appears to match the existing building’s horizontal siding. However, existing historic-age windows will be replaced. 3.1: Front of Houses. Retain the historic facade of a house in terms of door and window placement and exterior wall materials. Repair damaged or deteriorated exterior wall materials where reasonably possible. If replacement of exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material identical in size, profile, and appearance as the historic material. 3.2: Doors and Doorways. Do not enlarge, alter, or relocate single doorways on the façade of …
