June 12, 2020 Emily Reed, Chair City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: 2502 Park View Drive Dear Ms. Reed, Preservation Austin has been our city’s leading nonprofit voice for historic preservation since 1953. We write today to express our dismay at the proposed demolition of 2502 Park View Drive, located in Allandale’s Air Conditioned Village. We ask the Historic Landmark Commission to support historic zoning for this significant property in the areas of Architecture, Historical Associations, and Community Value. The Air Conditioned Village was built in 1954 to assess the cost-effectiveness and profitability of central air in middle-class housing. Twenty-three houses, each featuring air-conditioning systems from a different manufacturer, were sold to families who agreed to allow their homes and habits to be studied by University of Texas scientists. Austinite Ned Cole, an architect and head of the air-conditioning subcommittee of the National Association of Homes Builders, spearheaded the project, which was the first multi-home experiment of its kind worldwide. Local architects and builders designed each unique home with energy-saving design elements to test their effectiveness. These include window placement along north and south facades; trees, trellises, and overhangs; pale paint colors and white roofing materials to reflect sunlight. Architect Fred Day designed 2502 Park View Drive, known as “The Air Temp.” Energy-efficient features include south-facing orientation and a wide, low-pitched roof which extends nearly four feet beyond the home’s footprint on all sides. Distinctive brick screens, exposed roof beams, and its asymmetrical façade make this home one of the development’s most stylized examples of mid-century design. Day (1926-2014) was a recent graduate of the UT School of Architecture. He worked for Ned Cole and Fehr & Granger before establishing his own firms in the 1960s. Day merged with Jessen Jessen Millhouse Greeven & Crume to become Jessen, Inc. in 1969, and served as the firm’s principal and president until 1993. His distinguished career included numerous awards from AIA Austin and the Texas Society Architects. He was president of AIA Austin and awarded an honorary Life Membership on the UTSOA Advisory Council. His works include Austin’s Teacher Retirement System Building, Faulk Central Library, Austin Doctors Building, renovations to the UT Law School and Student Union, the Recreation and Convocation Center at St. Edwards University, the pro bono master plan and drawings for Laguna Gloria, and the Visitors Center at McDonald Observatory. According to his obituary: “An innovative designer, he …
Brummett, Elizabeth From: Sent: To: Subject: Dan Keshet Friday, July 23, 2021 3:50 PM Brummett, Elizabeth 1308 Lavaca Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Completed *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello, I am writing to urge against the initiation of historic zoning for the disused gas station at 1308 Lavaca St. The building is indeed old, but it does not in any way contribute to the character of downtown. It is an eyesore and entirely out of context. There is no use for this building which at once honors its origins as a chain corporate gas station and contributes to its surroundings. If it is allowed to stand, there is nobody that is going to look at it and say "I'm so glad we preserved this building." On a list of Austin icons, nobody is going to say: the Driskill, the Bremond Block, the Capitol, and that old busted‐up Mobil station. Instead, it will continue to be a useless eyesore. Even if they find a use for it, that use will be inappropriate for this portion of downtown, which is increasingly pedestrian‐oriented, without the large featureless surface parking lot that this lot has. It would honestly be an embarrassment for Austin to enshrine this as one of its key shining historic landmarks. Thank you, Dan Keshet 908 Nueces St #22 78701 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
From Subject Received Size Catego... Mention .x x x. Save No-Comply, oppose demolition of 812 W ... Sat 7/24/... 46 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Do it for the skateboarders. This s a staple in the Austin area we cannot lose. .x x x.: 1 item(s), 1 unread 097mbanos: 1 item(s), 1 unread 10304josh: 1 item(s), 1 unread 2k420 Homies: 1 item(s), 1 unread 097mba... No-Comply, oppose demolition 812 W. 12 st Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To who it my concern, Please do not demolition No-Comply, they are a local business for 10304jo... Save No-Comply, oppose demolition of 812 W.... Sat 7/24/... 37 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** No Comply is such a staple of Austin. The countless trips I've taken to your city, they are 2k420 H... SAVE NOCOMPLY Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** DONT RUIN HISTORY AND COMMUNITY THAT SHOP IS A BACKBONE FOR SKATEBOARDING : 1 item(s), 1 unread 346349... Sat 7/24/... 813... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** <end> 3than Balmer: 1 item(s), 1 unread 3than B... No Comply skate shop Mon 7/26... 37 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi, I’m writing in favor of preserving the No-Comply skateshop in Austin on 12th st. It’s : 1 item(s), 1 unread 4austinz... Save No-Comply, oppose demolition of 812 W.... Sat 7/24/... 38 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi, 7ain77: 1 item(s), 1 unread 7ain77 Protest of Proposed Demolition of 812 w. 12th... Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To who is reading this regarding the demolition of 812 w. 12th st. No comply is a big part of A A SAVE NO-COMPLY, oppose demolition of 812 ... Sat 7/24/... 37 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Most of my friends/ and family have No- Comply tattooed on them. For life. This is dire. This A O Reject the demolition permit for No Comply Sat 7/24/... 35 ... *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** As a resident of Austin, I ask that the city please reject or nullify the demolition permit given A A: 1 item(s), 1 unread A O: 1 item(s), 1 unread A Pitts: 1 item(s), 1 unread A Pitts SAVE NO-COMPLY, OPPOSE DEMOLITION OF 8... Sat 7/24/... 36 ... *** External …
Annual Internal Review This report covers the time period of 7/1/2020 to 6/30/2021 Historic Landmark Commission ____________________________________ The Board/Commission mission statement (per the City Code) is: Pursuant to Section 2-1-147(B) of the Code of the City of Austin, the Historic Landmark Commission: 1. Shall prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designation as historic landmarks. 2. Shall prepare, review, and propose amendments to the Historic Landmark Preservation Plan. 3. Shall review requests to establish or remove a historic designation and make recommendations on the requests to the Land Use Commission, as determined in accordance with Section 25-1-46 of the Code of the City of Austin. 4. Shall provide information and counseling to owners of structures that are designated as historic structures. 5. May initiate zoning or rezoning of property to establish or remove a historic 6. May recommend amendments to the Code of the City of Austin relating to designation. historic preservation. 7. May recommend that the City acquire property if the Commission finds that acquisition by the City is the only means by which to preserve the property. 8. May advise the Council on matters relating to historic preservation. 9. For an object that is not permanently affixed to land, may recommend that Council confer special historic designation, and 10. Shall perform other duties as prescribed by the Code of the City of Austin or other ordinance. Annual Review and Work Plan – Historic Landmark Commission Year 2020-2021 Page 2 1. Describe the board’s actions supporting their mission during the previous calendar year. Address all elements of the board’s mission statement as provided in the relevant sections of the City Code. 1. The Commission references several surveys in evaluating historical significance for historic-age properties subject to applications for demolition and relocation permits, as well as building permits in National Register districts. These include the East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016), the Old Austin Neighborhood Association / West Downtown survey (2020), and the North Central Austin survey (2021), among others. A survey of Cherrywood, Wilshire Wood, and Delwood is anticipated to be completed in fiscal year 2021-22. 2. The Commission recommended new citywide Historic Design Standards as an essential resource for property owners and professionals that increases equity in City processes. A working group of dedicated residents, professionals, and City staff drafted clear, accessible standards that balance high local development pressures …
July 26, 2021 City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: Agenda Items B2 and B3 Historic Landmark Commissioners: I represent the owners of Capitol Center, an office building at 919 Congress Avenue. We have owned this property since 2005, and for almost that long, the buildings at 907, 909 and 911 Congress Avenue have been in total disrepair. They are dilapidated, unsafe and unsightly, especially as this path is the gateway to the Capitol. While we support the applicant’s proposal to demolish the buildings, we do so only under the express understanding the demolition be done in accordance with all laws and codes. As a directly adjacent property owner, we also expect to review and approve all proposed plans, construction and demolition work techniques and delivery condition of the vacant lot. Additionally, we would expect decorative fencing be installed as to dissuade loitering and other unlawful uses to maintain a safe environment. We look forward to an improved condition for these buildings and seeing future development plans for the site. Sincerely, Julia Taylor Executive Vice President
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Preservation Plan Committee Monday, July 19, 2021, 2 p.m. MEETING TO BE HELD WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance. All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Preservation Plan Committee meeting, members of the public must: Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon the day before the meeting. The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to committee members in advance of the meeting. Reunión Especial del Comité del Plan de la Preservación Histórica Un Comité de la Comisión de Sitios Históricos FECHA de la reunion 19 de julio, 2021 LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (18 de julio, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974- 3393 o preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar ). …
1. 2. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE THURSDAY, JUNE 24, 2021 – 1 p.m. VIA VIDEOCONFERENCING COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath x x Terri Myers Beth Valenzuela x DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No citizen communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 21, 2021 May 7, 2021 MOTION: Approve meeting minutes from April 21 and May 7 on a motion by Heimsath, Valenzuela seconds. Vote: 2-0 (Myers absent). DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Discuss Preservation Plan Working Group applications Review objectives and discussion agreements Overview of evaluation process and quorum considerations Commissioner Myers joined the meeting. Role of Preservation Plan Committee Local residency, geographic distribution, and unique perspectives Recommend Preservation Plan Working Group member list to the Historic Landmark Commission B. MOTION: Adjourn by Valenzuela, Heimsath seconds. Vote: 3-0. Adjourned at 3:05 p.m. ADJOURNMENT 1 The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-1686 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Preservation Plan Committee, please contact Cara Bertron, Senior Planner, at 512-974-1446. 2
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee Monday, July 12, 2021, 2:00 PM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TO BE HELD MONDAY, JULY 12, 2021 WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING MODIFICATIONS This meeting is limited in duration. Please make presentations as brief as possible (consider 5 minutes) so that all applicants may have the chance to present to and receive input from the committee members. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. Community members may register for citizen communication but may not speak on specific cases on the agenda. The opportunity for public input on specific cases will occur at a subsequent meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. This meeting is not televised. Community members may also register to receive call in information and listen to the meeting via telephone. All participants must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, July 11, 2021) to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions. To listen to or participate in the Architectural Review Committee meeting, all persons must: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, July 11, 2021 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion 12 de julio 2021 a las dos de la tarde (2:00 p.m.) LA JUNTA SE LLEVARÁ EL LUNES, EL 12 DE JULIO 2021 CON MODIFICACIONES DE DISTANCIAMIENTO SOCIAL Esta reunion tiene una duracion limitada. Haga todas …
PROJECT LOCATION | PROXIMITY MAP GENERAL NOTES W 9TH STREET W 9TH STREET W 8TH STREET PROJECT LOCATION N N T LY S E W W 6TH STREET 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGLY REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAWINGS, NOTES, DIMENSIONS AND SCHEDULES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE A DETAILED SITE VISIT, AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY BRING ANY INCONSISTENCY, SITE LAYOUT PROBLEM, OR ANY OTHER REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION TO THE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO THE DELIVERY OF ANY BID OR INITIATION OF WORK. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL CAUSE THE CONTRACTOR TO BE INELIGIBLE FOR EXTRAS RELATING TO SUCH MATTERS. 2. THESE DRAWINGS ARE, IN GENERAL, DIAGRAMMATIC. EXACT LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR FROM FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR'S PERSONNEL. ACTUAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE WORK SHALL FOLLOW LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WITHIN THE CONSTRAINTS OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION. DRAWING AND NOTES TO DRAWINGS ARE CORRELATIVE AND HAVE EQUAL AUTHORITY AND PRIORITY. SHOULD THERE BE DISCREPANCIES IN THEMSELVES OR BETWEEN THEM, CONTRACTOR SHALL BASE BID PRICING ON THE MOST EXPENSIVE COMBINATION OF QUALITY AND/OR QUANTITY OF THE WORK INDICATED. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES, OBTAIN CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT BEFORE CONTINUING WORK. 3. DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR ANY OTHER REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION. 4. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE ORDERING MATERIAL AND PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 5. MINIMUM CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS INDICATED SHALL BE MAINTAINED PARTICULARLY AT STAIRS, CORRIDORS AND RESTROOMS. 6. CONTRACTOR TO ACQUIRE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO WORK. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY, ACTIONS AND CONDUCT OF HIS EMPLOYEES AND HIS SUBCONTRACTORS' EMPLOYEES WHILE IN THE PROJECT AREA, ADJACENT AREAS AND IN THE BUILDING AND ITS VICINITY. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE SHOP DRAWINGS TO ARCHITECT FOR OWNER'S, ARCHITECT'S, AND ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. 9. ALL MATERIALS, FINISHES, MANUFACTURED ITEMS, AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUPPLIER'S OR MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS OR THESE DOCUMENTS, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT OF ANY VARIATION REQUIRED IN THE DIMENSION NOTED FOR VERIFICATION FOR INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT BEFORE CONTINUING THE WORK. 10. EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE ON THE PART OF THE ARCHITECT TO ENSURE LOCAL CODE COMPLIANCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THAT THE WORK CONFORMS WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, AND IF DISCREPANCIES ARE NOTED, TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT …
6 1 3 W E S T L Y N N 0 1 J U LY 2 0 2 1 E X I S T I N G S I T E C O N D I T I O N S WEST LYNN SPEC613 W LYNN ST, AUSTIN TX 7870301 JULY 2021 AIR CONDITIONED AREA: 4,854 SQFT PROJECT CODE ANALYSIS ZONING: PARCEL ID: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: LOT SIZE: FLOOR AREA RATIO: IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: MAIN HOUSE BASEMENT FLOOR: LEVEL 01: LEVEL 02: TOTAL: ADU LEVEL 01: LEVEL 02: TOTAL: CARPORT: GARAGE: 10'-9 1/2" BUILDING TENT 5; HIGHEST GRADE: 523'-11 3/4" MF-4 NP 106602 V-B 10,130 SQFT (.233 ACRES) PROVIDED: 39% (3,934 SQFT) ALLOWED: MAX 40% (4,052 SQFT) PROVIDED: 44% (4473.5) ALLOWED: 45% (4558.5) 1,187 SQFT 1,868 SQFT 701 SQFT 3,756 SQFT 549 SQFT 549 SQFT 1,098 SQFT 267 SQFT 445 SQFT 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 4; HIGHEST GRADE: 524'-9 1/2" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 3; HIGHEST GRADE: 527'-2" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 2; HIGHEST GRADE: 532'-3" 40'-0" BUILDING TENT 1; HIGHEST GRADE: 536'-6" 32'-1/4" BUILDING LINE Y E L L A ' 4 1 . 7 4 W " 5 2 ' 3 2 ° 5 2 S 520 D R A Y R A E R D E C U D E R " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S 521 522 D R A Y R A E R " 0 - ' 0 1 K C A B T E S 520 521 FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 1 521'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 2 533'-7 3/4" NEW 2 GARAGE (445 SF) NEW 2-STORY ADU (1,098 SF + 295 SF CARPORT) 523 524 525 0.233 ACRES 10,130 SQ.FT EXISTING POOL HIGH POINT TENT 2 +532'-3" HIGH POINT FRONT SETBACK +536'-3 3/8" 15'-0" HISTORIC PRESERVATION REQUIRED " 7 - ' 9 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 9 SIDE YARD SETBACK 5'-0" MIN. ADJ. GRADE +527'-5 1/2" BASEMENT BELOW REPRESENTED AS HATCHED. FULLY CONTAINED WITHIN LEVEL 1 D R A Y T N O R F " 0 - ' 5 2 K C A B T E S LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD EXISTING PAVING FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 0 527'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 1 538'-7 3/4" FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION: LEVEL 2 550'-7 3/4" NEW 2-STORY ADDITION (3,417 SF) EXISTING 1-STORY TO REMAIN (339 SF) MAX ADJ. GRADE +536'-2" D E P A C S …
SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". = EXISTING FOOTPRINT = PROPOSED FOOTPRINT LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8 AND THE NORTH 20 FEET OF LOT 7, ENFIELD "D", A SUBDIVISION IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 3, PAGE 158 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. PROPOSED CARPORT PROPOSED PORCH S 62°28'26" E 180.30' (180) " 0 - 5 ' . E . U . P 14'-1" EXISTING RESIDENCE EXISTING PORCH EXISTING POOL D A O E R S A E P ) ' 0 0 1 ( ' 2 1 . 0 2 1 ' E " 1 1 8 4 7 2 N ° EXISTING PORCH " / 8 3 7 - 3 1 ' 24'-0" EXISTING PORCH 25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK LOT LINE " ' 0 - 2 2 " 0 - 5 ' . E . U . P W I N S 0 1 ° 2 0 ' 5 D S O R " 6 W 1 R O 3 3 . 9 A 7 ' D MULCH 0 " D D E E 0 '- . L 6 B . 1 0 " R A R A B T 0 '- E R Y E S D A K C 5 '- P 0 " E U N 62°26'55" W 239.98' SITE PLAN 1 SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" TRUE NORTH ZONING SF-3-H LOT SIZE 25,252 SF TREE SCHEDULE TREE # SIZE/TYPE 776 23" CEDAR ELM 8719 34.5" CEDAR ELM 8703 CRAPE MYRTLE 8720 20" PECAN 8704 20" CEDAR ELM 85 SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 8706 24.5" LIGUSTRUM 86 SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 8707 19" RED OAK 91 CEDAR ELM 8708 33.5" RED OAK 01 LIVE OAK 8709 23" RED OAK 8711 CRAPE MYRTLE 8710 22" RED OAK 8718 19" RED OAK PROTECTED TREE NOTES: DRIP LINE CALCULATION 1'-0" PER 0'-1" OF TRUNK ALL TREES & NATURAL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF AUSTIN STANDARDS OF TREE PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMIT APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TREES WITH A DIAMETER OF 19" OR MORE. ALL EXCAVATION UNDER TREE DRIP LINE TO BE DONE BY HAND. CUT …
The Kenney Lomax House KEY PLAN A B B STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY - STARBUCKS PICK UP FORMAT - 22ND + RIO GRANDE, AUSTIN TX - EXTERIOR SIGNAGE REVIEW The Kenney Lomax House KEY PLAN A B STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY - STARBUCKS PICK UP FORMAT - 22ND + RIO GRANDE, AUSTIN TX - EXTERIOR SIGNAGE REVIEW A
01 1415 W 10th Street Residence HLC PRESENTATION | CLARK RICHARDSON ARCHITECTS | 7.09.2021 02 1415 W 10th | Site Survey (1415 W 10th Street) (1417 W 10th Street) 03 1415 W 10th | Street View Looking South 04 Existing Structure: Photo from Front of Property Existing Structure: Photo from Middle of Property 05 Existing Structure: Photo Looking South at Structure Existing Structure: Photo Looking East at Structure 06 96 FT Proposed Project: Site Plan 07 Proposed Project: Site Axonometric 09 10 11 12 OWANA Zoning Committee & Neighborhood Outreach Summary: 13 9.24.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting: Ed Richardson | CRA presents existing site conditions and proposed design to OWANA Zoning Committee. 10.13.2020: Meeting with Adjacent Neighbors: Ed Richardson | CRA meets all directly adjacent neighbors at 1415 W 10th to review proposed design. Topics included: - Reviewed Existing and Proposed Drainage on site with east neighbor. - Reviewed Height and Location of proposed structures. Reviewed what each neighbor with views into the lot could expect to see from their homes. - Discussed Fence Heights and Location. We will have lowered the fence along W 10th St. - Reviewed Second Floor Window Alignments: Between the proposed structure and the existing home to the east. - Clark Richardson field surveyed the window locations - and mapped them on the survey and reviewed with property owner. There are no direct window alignments. 10.22.2020: OWANA Zoning Committee Meeting II: Ed Richardson | CRA presented our responses to the comments / concerns from the previous meeting Shoring: The noise and disruption from potential shoring for the construction of the basement was a primary concern for neighbors. CRA recommends no driven piles be used for shoring and instead drilled piers be used in any temporary shoring required. The structural work for the shoring will be part of the means and methods for construction of the basement by the contractor and therefore while it will be engineered. The precise drawings will not be included in the architectural drawings. Street Façade: We’re proposing a specimen tree be added in front of the street façade complimenting the window located towards the west side of the façade (see 9). Site Drainage: We’ve sketched in the proposed French drain system for the lot and plan to use the front yard to filter run off from the southside of the lot. Not mentioned in the previous meeting, the second-floor roofed areas …
