Historic Landmark Commission Homepage

RSS feed for this page

Upcoming meetings

Architectural Review Committee Meeting - Rm 1401/1402
Sept. 28, 2020

A.1.1. - Chrysler Air-Temp House, 2502 Park View Drive - Proposed rehabilitation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

NEW METAL ROOF STANDING SEAM OVER MEMBRANE W/ SPRAY FOAM INSULATION AT UNDERSIDE OF ROOF DECK REPAIR & AIR SEAL WINDOW FRAMES. REPLACE ALL GLASS WITH NEW INSULATED AND TEMPERED GLASS PER LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. GLASS OPENINGS TO REMAIN SAME SIZE. EXPOSED RAKE BEAMS REPAIR & PAINT WALL PLATE TO REMAIN AS IS, +/-7'-7" REPAIR & AIR SEAL WINDOW FRAMES. REPLACE ALL GLASS WITH NEW INSULATED AND TEMPERED GLASS PER LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. GLASS OPENINGS TO REMAIN SAME SIZE. REPLACE EXISTING ASBESTOS PANELS WITH NEW SMOOTH WALL PANELS (HPL OR FIBER CEMENT SMOOTH FINISH) NEW PANELS TO MATCH EXISTING SIZE REPLACE EXISTING 2-CAR CARPORT WOOD COLUMNS WITH NEW STEEL COLUMNS PAINTED PERFORATED BRICK WALL AT REAR OF CARPORT TO REMAIN LOW BRICK WALL REMAINS, REPOINT & REPAIR AS NEEDED. GROUT COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING Cedar & Oak 2502 Park View Drive Austin, TX .exist 4 Sept. 23, 2020 1 OF 1 .Historic Front at Side 2 .exist 4 . L A V O R P P A Y R O T A L U G E R R O G N T T M R E P I I , I N O T C U R T S N O C R O F T O N I A A , I T T W L T T O C S I E R U T C E T H C R A T T W I , 9 1 0 2 T H G R Y P O C I c

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.2.0 - 2609 San Pedro St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2020-0231 2609 SAN PEDRO STREET A.2 - 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a ca. 1935 house, originally constructed as a duplex. Two-story frame hipped-roof duplex with horizontal wood siding, 6:6 wood windows, composition shingles, and a second-floor balcony. The building at 2609 San Pedro Street was originally a duplex, built in 1935 as a rental property for medical journalist Josephine Draper Daniel. Daniel resided down the block at another rental property on Salado Street until she moved to San Pedro after 1944. After the 1914 death of her husband, physician F. E. Daniel, Josephine Daniel took over his position as editor of the Texas Medical Journal for the next thirty years. F. E. Daniel, a former Confederate army surgeon and Texas Medical College professor, founded the journal in 1885. It later became the most influential medical publication of its time in Texas. Prior to her tenure as editor, Josephine Daniel contributed as founder of the Texas Medical Journal’s “Women’s Department” section since 1912, appealing to a wider demographic than the predominantly male medical field. As editor, Daniel introduced her audience to early tenets of feminism in healthcare and openly contradicted the eugenicist positions championed by her late husband. In a fall 2001 article for The Historian, entitled “The Woman's Department: Maternalism and Feminism in the Texas Medical Journal,” historian Courtney Shah describes Daniel’s evolution as a journalist: Josephine Daniel, although not openly recommending a radical feminist political platform, quietly introduced feminist ideas to her maternalist audience as well as many male physicians. The Women’s Department walked a narrow path between deference to medical and societal experts, and a demand to liberate women from the very institutions the experts represented: the sexual hierarchy of the family, the medical profession, and the state […] [As editor] she [promoted] her own two-pronged campaign of reform: maternalist issues such as reducing infant mortality and pure food laws, and the more radical feminist edge of birth control and women’s emancipation. (Shah 2001, 96-97) Daniel wrote frankly about the importance of reproductive education, stating that "The health and happiness of every girl demands that she receive when approaching adolescence an intelligent presentation of the vital life process” (95). In 1929, Daniel sold the journal and devoted her time to women’s health and literacy advocacy in Austin. She led an active civic life as a state board …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.2.1 - 2609 San Pedro St - Applicant Photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.2.2 - 2609 San Pedro St - Inspection Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 35 pages

BPG Inspection, LLC 2609 San Pedro Street Austin TX 78705 Client(s): Joseph Inspection Date: 9/15/2020 Inspector: Randal Pitts , 9911 Page 1 of 35 PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Prepared For: Cater Joseph Concerning: 2609 San Pedro Street, Austin, TX 78705 By: Randal Pitts 9911 / BPG Inspection, LLC 9/15/2020 (Address or Other Identification of Inspected Property) (Name of Client) (Name and License Number of Inspector) (Date) (Name, License Number of Sponsoring Inspector) PURPOSE, LIMITATIONS AND INSPECTOR / CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES This property inspection report may include an inspection agreement (contract), addenda, and other information related to property conditions. If any item or comment is unclear, you should ask the inspector to clarify the findings. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. This inspection is subject to the rules (“Rules”) of the Texas Real Estate Commission (“TREC”), which can be found at www.trec.texas.gov. The TREC Standards of Practice (Sections 535.227-535.233 of the Rules) are the minimum standard for inspections by TREC Licensed inspectors. An inspection addresses only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection. While there may be other parts, components or systems present, only those items specifically noted as being inspected were inspected. The inspector is NOT required to turn on decommissioned equipment, systems, utility services or apply an open flame or light a pilot to operate any appliance. The inspector is NOT required to climb over obstacles, move furnishings or stored items. The inspection report may address issues that are code-based or may refer to a particular code; however, this is NOT a code compliance inspection and does NOT verify compliance with manufacturer’s installation instructions. The inspection does NOT imply insurability or warrantability of the structure or its components. Although some safety issues may be addressed in this report, this inspection is NOT a safety/code inspection, and the inspector is NOT required to identify all potential hazards. In this report, the inspector shall indicate, by checking the appropriate boxes on the form, whether each item was inspected, not inspected, not present or deficient and explain the findings in the corresponding section in the body of the report form. The inspector must check the Deficient (D) box if a condition exists that adversely and materially affects the performance of a system or component or constitutes a hazard to life, limb or property as specified by the TREC Standards of …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.2.3 - 2609 San Pedro St - Letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.2.4 - 2609 San Pedro St - Structural Evaluation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

Structural Evaluation Report 2609 San Pedro St. Austin, Texas 78705 Report Issued: September 17th, 2020 Prepared For: Cater Joseph Joseph Companies cater@josephcompanies.com Prepared By: FORT Structures TBPE#: 18034 2235 East 6th St. #105, Austin, Texas 78702 512-817-9264 www.fortstructures.com Page 1 of 7 Subject: Structural Evaluation Report – 2609 San Pedro St, Austin TX, 78705 Fort Structures PC is pleased to submit the results of the structural evaluation for the above-referenced project. This report briefly presents the findings of the visual study along with our conclusions and repair recommendations. If you have any questions regarding the information in this report, please feel free to contact me at 512-565-7026, or ben@fortstructures.com, sam@fortstructures.com September 17, 2020 I warrant that I visually inspected the components of this property as addressed in this report in a diligent manner and have honestly reported the findings existing conditions and have made recommendations based on my experience and opinion. Fort Structures does not express or imply any guarantee of specific future structural performance with the limited scope of this inspection; rather, this is my best effort to interpret my observations and develop an opinion as to structural significance. There may be other issues affecting the structure that are not visible without destructive investigation. The conditions of the various components of this property described in this report are true as of the date of inspection. Changes may occur in this property after the inspection date, which could make null and void the contents of this report. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is hereby made. 2609 San Pedro St., Austin, TX Structural Evaluation Report Page 2 of 7 September 17th, 2020 Client: Cater Joseph Joseph Companies cater@josephcompanies.com Sincerely, Benjamin Higgins, EIT Project Manager Samuel Covey, P.E. Principal, TX Reg# 123,796 FORT Structures PC TBPE Firm# 18034 Note: On September 10th, 2020, Fort Structures performed an on-site visual, noninvasive evaluation of the subject property. The structure is a two-story, approximately 2400 SF duplex constructed circa 1928. The foundation of the house is a pier and beam construction with piers and dimensional 2x wood floor framing. The walls and roof are framed with dimensional lumber. For the age of construction, our limited investigation revealed that the building structure is in fair to poor condition. The following deficiencies were observed: • Moderate levels of floor foundation movement were recorded throughout the structure. Approximately 1.5” of differential floor movement was observed throughout …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.2.5 - 2609 San Pedro St - Article original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 19 pages

The Woman's Department: Maternalism and Feminism in the Texas Medical Journal Author(s): Courtney Shah Source: The Historian, FALL 2001, Vol. 64, No. 1 (FALL 2001), pp. 81-98 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.com/stable/24450673 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Historian This content downloaded from (cid:0)162.89.0.57 on Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:19:21 UTC(cid:0) (cid:0) All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) (cid:0) The Woman's Department: Maternalism and Feminism in the Texas Medical Journal Courtney Shah In 1912, a physician praised the Texas Medical Journals newly established Woman's Department in a letter to the editor. "The department you are establishing... along this line, giving women good, wholesome knowledge without the taint of quackery is a most worthy undertaking and deserves hearty support,"1 he wrote. The Texas Medical Journal, the most popular and long-standing independent medical journal in the state, was the creation of Dr. Ferdinand Eugene Daniel. His wife, Josephine Draper Daniel, founded the Woman's Department as an insert within the pages of the TMJ. Like so many journalists and activists in the Progressive Era, Josephine used maternalism as a justification to expand women's roles in the public sphere, as well as to justify her own ambitions. But while she usually stressed conservative reforms that did not challenge the dominant model of family life or women's place within it, Josephine Daniel simultaneously presented two curious lines of dissent. First, she challenged the TM/s (and thus her husband's) pro-eugenics stance; and second, she introduced a veneer of radical feminism into the publication, expressed mainly in a more open attitude toward women's sexuality. As Americans coped with the harsh realities of industrialization, urbanization, and immigration in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, a reform-minded cadre of well educated, middle-class men and women saw the possibility for change to eradicate the …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:40 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

A.3.0 - 2816 San Pedro St original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 29 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2020-0293 2816 SAN PEDRO STREET A.3 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1924 house. ARCHITECTURE 2816 San Pedro is a 1.5-story stucco residence with rectangular Cape Cod plan. It is side-gabled with a composite-shingle roof, three gabled dormers with 1:1 wood windows and lap siding, and a gabled portico supported by Classical columns. At the main elevation’s southernmost bay is a bank of 4:4 and 6:6 mulled windows framed with decorative shutters. The northernmost bay contains a single 12:12 window with similar shutters. The inset door is surrounded by a fanlight and sidelights. A hipped-roof addition to the south features 2:2 windows and a secondary double- door entry. A detached two-story garage apartment is northwest of the main house. RESEARCH The building at 2816 San Pedro Street was constructed for the Wyse family around 1924. William Riley Wyse, an independent oilman with ties to Austin’s power and water company, passed away shortly after its construction. Ellen Borroughs Wyse, his spouse, remained there with her son and daughter-in-law. Ellen Wyse was a prominent writer, editor, and business owner in Austin. Early in her career, Wyse served as the society editor for the Austin Statesman, then expanded her literary horizons to include her life’s passion: advertising. She established Gossip Advertising in 1911 at the age of thirty-eight, beginning with a single-page newspaper insert. By the 1920s, Gossip had grown into a multi-page publication and household name among Austinites, particularly women. The paper’s offices were located first at the Austin National Bank Building and later at the Scarbrough Building, as noted on its state historical marker. After more than thirty years of continuous publication, Wyse’s declining health shuttered Gossip’s pressroom in 1945. In addition to owning and operating a successful business—an extraordinary accomplishment for a woman in the early twentieth century—Wyse used her talent and charisma to reach out to other women writers. She presented to the Texas Presswomen’s Association across the state, sharing strategies for entering the male-dominated advertising field and establishing successful marketing tactics with a targeted and loyal readership. She was a founding member of the Quill Club (later, the Kwill Klub), a women’s organization that blossomed from a small collection of writers to a thriving consortium whose meetings included educators, librarians, professional authors (including Josephine Daniels, editor of the Texas Medical Journal, who also lived on San Pedro), prominent …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:41 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

B.4.0 - 1412 Wathen - staff report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.4 - 1 SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 C14H-2010-0024 WILDER HOUSE 1412 WATHEN AVENUE PROPOSAL Replace the metal roof with a similar metal roof. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes to replace the existing metal roof with a new metal roof, as it is beginning to fail and the existing roof is no longer manufactured. The existing roof is original to the house. The house was designed in the French Provincial style by Houston architect Armon E. Mabry; the roof, with its distinctive lines, is integral to the design of the house. The applicant proposes to replace the front one-third of the roof with a custom product to match the existing failing sections of the roof. The proposed product for the front of the house is Kynar 1.5 Snap-Lock system with a classic batten; this is a custom product that comes as close to the existing standing seam metal roof as possible in terms of material thickness and dimensions. The existing standing seam and batten is 2 inches wide; the proposed replacement will be just under 2 inches wide. The existing standing seam and batten is 1.75 inches high; the replacement will be 1.5 inches tall. The differences between the dimensions of the existing and proposed roof are between 1/8 and ¼ of an inch. The proposed roof will be 24-gauge metal. For the middle section of the roof, the applicant proposes a Kynar 1.5” tall Snap-Lock 24g metal roof system with a seam of three-quarters of an inch. This section of the roof is not visible from the street. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: The existing metal roof is failing and must be replaced to ensure the preservation of the house. 5) Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Evaluation: The existing ca. 1950 metal roof is no longer manufactured; the applicant is proposing a modern replacement that will be visually indistinguishable from the existing. 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:41 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

B.4.1 - 1412 Wathen - roof plan original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:41 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

B.5.0 - Miller-Searight House, 5400 Freidrich Lane - staff report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B.5 - 1 SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 C14H-1982-0004 MILLER-SEARIGHT HOUSE 5400 FREIDRICH LANE PROPOSAL Replace all windows in the house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes to replace all the windows in the historic house with a solid vinyl window as shown in the accompanying literature. The applicant has conducted a survey of the condition of all the windows in the house and has chosen to replace them all at the same time to maintain uniformity of appearance. Some of the windows are beyond repair. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1) The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Evaluation: Replacing all of the windows in the house will affect the historic character of the property. The original wood windows are a big part of the historic appearance and character of the house. 5) Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved. Evaluation” The existing wood windows are a distinctive material on this property. The proposed solid vinyl windows will not present the same appearance. 6) Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. Evaluation: The applicant has conducted a window survey to determine the condition of each window on the house and its prospect for repair or rehabilitation. Any windows that are beyond repair due to their deterioration should be replaced in kind, or another wood window that maintains the profile and configuration of the existing historic windows. Design standards in place for local historic districts in Austin prohibit the use of vinyl windows on any street-facing elevation. 9) New additions and adjacent or related construction will be undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Evaluation: If the Commission approves the proposed windows, they could be replaced at a …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:41 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

B.5.1 - Miller-Searight House, 5400 Freidrich Lane - Window survey original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

August 14, 2020 Miller Searight House 5400 Freidrich La Austin TX 78744 Condition notes 1 2 3 4 *Note Window Schedule Window Photos West façade Window Survey Compiled September 2019Vincent P. Hauser Architect Abbreviations stl cstl wd cmt wd dh wd fix Hot rolled Steel / industrial type Cold rolled steel / Hollow metal fire windows Wood casement Wood double hung Wood fixed Good - Complete and repairable for rehabilitation Fair - Damaged or missing elements but repairable for conventional rehabilitation * Poor - Significant missing and / or rotted elments and not repairable for rehabilitation Missing sash and / or frame or both Excluding Texas Windstorm Requirements Building Façade / Level Window # Window Type Hist Condition Notes, Min work Preferred Option Window Chronology 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Porch wd fx wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh not used wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd dh wd cmt x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Non Hist x x 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 3 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.5 2 Repair and paint exg Repair sash and sill, paint Repair sash and sill, paint Repair sash and sill, paint Repair sash and sill, paint Repair sash and sill, paint Repair sash and sill, paint Repair and pt exg Provide new Provide new Provide new Provide new Provide new Provide new Original to home Original to home Original to home Early addition Early addition Early addition Early addition Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Repair sash and sill, paint Provide new Remove modern wdw, repair frame, ptProvide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, frame, paint Provide new Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, paint Provide new Rebuild sash and sill, paint Porch to be rebuilt Provide new Early addition Early addition Early …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:41 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

B.5.2 - Miller-Searight House, 5400 Freidrich Lane - previously approved drawings original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 16 pages

M MASONRY MATERIAL MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MEZZANINE MANUFACTURER MIDDLE MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MARK MASONRY OPENING METAL MOUNTED NORTH NOT APPLICABLE NEAR FACE NOT IN CONTRACT NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE ON CENTER OVERFLOW DRAIN OUTSIDE FACE OWNER FURNISHED CONTRACTOR INSTALLED OWNER FURNISHED OWNER INSTALLED OPPOSITE HAND OPENING OPPOSITE OVERFLOW THROUGH WALL SCUPPER PRE-CAST CONCRETE PERIMETER PERPENDICULAR POINT OF INTERSECTION PLATE PROPERTY LINE PLASTIC LAMINATE PLUMBING PLYWOOD PANEL PAIR PREFABRICATED PRELIMINARY PAINTED RADIUS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ROOF DRAIN REFERENCE, REFER REINFORCING REQUIRED REVISION, REVISE ROOM ROUND ROUGH OPENING RADIUS POINT ROOF TOP UNIT SOUTH SCHEDULED SECTION SQUARE FEET SHEET SIMILAR SHEET METAL SAW JOINT SLOPE SPECIFICATION STAINLESS STEEL SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL SURFACE TREAD OR TOP TOP OF TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS TOP OF CURB TELEPHONE TEMPORARY THICKNESS THREADED THROUGH TYPICAL N O P Q R S T U V W MAS MATL MAX MECH MEZZ MFR MID MIN MISC MK MO MTL MTD N N/A NF NIC NOM NTS OC OD OF OFCI OFOI OH OPG OPP OS PC PERIM PERP PI P PL PLAM PLBG PLYWD PNL PR PREFAB PRELIM PTD R RCP RD REF REINF REQD REV RM RND RO RP RTU S SCHED SECT SF SHT SIM SHT MTL SJ SL SPEC SS STC STD STL STRUCT SURF T TO TAS TC TEL TEMP THK THRD THRU TYP VB VCT VERT VEST VR VT VTR w/ WC WH WP UON UR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED URINAL VAPOR BARRIER VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERTICAL VESTIBULE VAPOR RETARDER VINYL TILE VENT THROUGH ROOF WITH WATER CLOSET WATER HEATER WORK POINT X,Y, & Z RESERVED A B C D E F G H I J K L ABBREVIATIONS: ABV ACOUST ACCU ACT AD ADA ADJ AFC AFF AHU ALUM AP ARCH ABOVE ACOUSTICAL AIR COOLED CONDENSING UNIT ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE ACCESS DOOR AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADJUSTABLE OR ADJACENT ABOVE FINISHED CEILING ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AIR HANDLING UNIT ALUMINUM ACCESS PANEL ARCHITECT, ARCHITECTURAL BFF BFE BLDG BOC BP BRG BRKT BS BW BO CAB CIP CJ CL CLG CLR CMU CO COL CONC CONST CONT CORR CT CTR D DEG DET DIA DIAG DIM DN DP DS DWG DWL E EA EF EIFS EFS EJ EL ELEC EQ EQUIP EW EWC EXIST EXP EXT FA FACP FCO FD FDC FDV FE FEC FF FG FH FHC FP F/R FRP FRT GALV GB GC GFRC GND GRS GTR GWB HT HB HC HDW HDWD HM …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:41 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

B.5.3 - Miller-Searight House, 5400 Freidrich Lane - Proposed window style guide original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

Featuring With Simonton you’re not only getting the ideal window for you and your home, you’re also getting the peace of mind that comes from over 65 years of experience. 1946 Simonton family founds Penn Vent Awning Company 1980 Changed specialization to vinyl windows 1992 7-day delivery introduced 2007 Simonton voted #1 in quality by Builder magazine 2009 Decorum® style options launched 2014 Became part of the Ply Gem family of brands. 1940 2018 The Simonton Brand We handcrafted our very first products in 1946 when gas was only 15 cents a gallon, the electric dryer was first sold and Dean Martin was just starting his career. Since then a lot has changed, including our products, but our standards for quality haven’t budged. Throughout the years, Simonton® has developed and perfected innovative, energy-efficient solutions that our customers have come to trust. Today, our legacy of customer loyalty and satisfaction is second to none. Our Reflections® 5500 premium vinyl replacement windows and doors provide a wide variety of options to ensure that you can find the perfect custom styling solution for your home. With industry- leading energy efficiency, weather resistance and quality, they provide unsurpassed reliability over the long haul. And to top it off, each Reflections 5500 window is custom built specifically for your home, delivered quickly and backed by our Double-Lifetime Limited Warranty. Our goal is to make the process of selecting the ideal window easy. The possibilities are endless, and that's why we're here to help you cut through the clutter with four easy steps. 1 2 3 4 Choose Your Operating Style: A wide variety of window and door styles provide functional options that are both pretty and smart. Choose Your Unique Configuration: A wide variety of window and door styles provide functional options that are both pretty and smart. Choose Your Style Options: Choose from a portfolio of popular exterior colors, interior colors, rich woodgrain laminates and custom hardware finishes, to create a custom style that fits your décor. Choose Your Glass and Grid Options: A variety of grid styles and patterns allow you to highlight the architectural style of your home. And choose from a selection of specialty glass options that help provide maximum energy efficiency, increase privacy, security and sound reduction. Reflections Choose your operating style. 1 With Simonton Reflections® 5500 you can choose from a variety of window shapes and operating styles to …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:42 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

C.1.0 - 319-23 E. 6th Street - Staff report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

C.1 - 1 PROPOSAL APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT WITHIN A NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SIXTH STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 HR-20-107348 319-323 E. 6TH STREET Construct a tall one-story addition to three contributing buildings within the Sixth Street National Register Historic District. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the construction of a continuous one-story addition across three one- story buildings that would be contributing to the Sixth Street National Register Historic District. The proposed addition will be set back 15 feet back from the front wall of the existing buildings, with an open deck in front. The applicant proposes to remove an existing deck cover from the building, giving the proposed addition a clean look from the street. The existing metal railing on the building will be painted in a muted tone to lessen its visibility. The addition will have painted horizontal lap siding, a wooden cornice treatment that takes its cue from the one-story buildings on the street, aluminum and glass overhead doors; aluminum and glass single leaf doors opening onto the deck will have transoms, keeping the fenestration line even and clean. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects in National Register historic districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. Evaluation: These are three commercial buildings that have become bars and night clubs over the years. The use of the proposed addition is not incompatible with the long-standing use of the ground-floor buildings, and is set back 15 feet from the wall to provide a visual distance between old and new. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Evaluation: These three buildings are one-story commercial buildings. The proposed addition is one story with a taller cornice, but the height of the fenestration on the addition comports to the height of the fenestration and storefronts on the ground story. The proposed addition is recessed and fades into the background; it is very compatible with the historic character of the existing building. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:42 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

C.1.1 - 319-23 E. 6th Street - Plans and Perspectives original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:42 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

D.1.0 - 815 Rutherford Place and 1204 Alta Vista Avenue original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 21 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2020-0274 815 RUTHERFORD PLACE AND 1204 ALTA VISTA AVENUE D.1 - 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1930 house at 815 Rutherford Place and a ca. 1948 house at 1204 Alta Vista Avenue. Both houses are on the same lot. ARCHITECTURE The ca. 1930 house at 815 Rutherford Place is a one-story, rectangular-plan, side-gabled, brick veneer Tudor Revival-style house with a central, steep-front-gabled entry bay containing a round-arched door; single and paired 1:1 fenestration. The ca. 1948 house at 1204 Alta Vista Avenue is a one-story, L-plan frame house with a partial-width inset porch. Fenestration consists of single and double 1:1 windows with Colonial Revival-styled 6:6 wooden screens. RESEARCH The house at 815 Rutherford Place was built around 1930 by Fred W. Sassman, the proprietor of a dry-cleaning business who later became a tailor. Fred Sassman and his wife lived in this house until around 1936. The house was vacant for a short period of time before being purchased by attorney John C. Butler and his wife, Ruby. John C. Butler passed away in 1963; Ruby Butler continued to live here after his death (there is a newspaper article dating from 1966 about their son that references this house as their home), but given current limitations on research, it is not possible to determine how much longer Ruby Butler lived in this house. John C. and Ruby Butler built the house at 1204 Alta Vista Avenue on the rear of their lot in 1948, and held it as a rental property. For the first ten years (until about 1958), the house was rented by Clarence and Anna Mae Waters. Clarence Waters was in the food service industry. After returning from duty in World War II, he became a manager of one of Harry Akin’s Night Hawk Restaurants. Immediately after beginning his job with Night Hawk, and before moving into this house, the city directory shows him living at the location of the old Night Hawk at South Congress and Riverside Drive. He and Anna Mae, who worked as a hostess at the Night Hawk, moved into this house, where they lived until around 1958. A newspaper article from 1954 shows Clarence Waters as associated with one of the restaurants in the new Terrace Motor Hotel on South Congress Avenue; by 1957, he was the sales manager for Polar Ice Cream. In …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:42 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

D.2.0 - 4714 Rowena Avenue - postponement request original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

D.2 Steve, Regarding my house at 4714 Rowena St., please postpone the meeting on the September 24th Austin Landmark Commission agenda and put me on for October 26th. Reminder, per our previous discussion, the buyer of the house has terminated the offer and will transfer the demolition application to me. cheers! Josh Wilson

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:42 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

D.5.0 - 2505 Park View Drive original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

D.5 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2020-0353 2505 PARK VIEW DRIVE PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1954 house in the Air-Conditioned Village. ARCHITECTURE One-story, side-gabled, Ranch-style house with deep eaves and an extension of the front roofline to constitute a covered walkway from what was the attached carport to the front door. The house has a combination of red brick and wood siding; fenestration consists of aluminum-framed sliding windows with a clerestory pane above; grouped in a triple configuration on the front of the house. The carport has been enclosed with horizontal siding, and contains a paired set of the same windows. The porch has been modified to give the house somewhat of an Arts and Crafts appearance with tapered porch posts and stone piers at the front door. To the left of the front door is a brick-veneered wall that extends almost to the roofline; a narrow band of horizontal wood siding containing a pair of sliding windows tops the brick veneer and wraps around the left side of the house. The house has two rear additions, constructed in 1963 and 1964, the latter providing a mother-in-law apartment on-site. RESEARCH The house at 2505 Park View Drive was the Frigidaire House, designed by Ned A. Cole. S.R. Sheppard was the builder. Frigidaire was one of the air conditioning companies pairing with local homebuilders and the National Association of Home Builders to construct houses to test the cost effectiveness and appeal of central air conditioning in houses priced for middle-class consumers. This house is one of several in the Air-Conditioned Village designed by Ned Cole, a local architect and designer, who was instrumental in attracting the National Association of Home Builders to Austin to build a small neighborhood of modest homes with central air conditioning. The builder was S.R. Sheppard, a local contractor who was interested in energy efficiency and had already constructed a house with wall and attic insulation and air conditioning in a nearby West Austin neighborhood before embarking on this more modest house in the Air-Conditioned Village. Austin’s Air-Conditioned Village was the largest of several experiments throughout the country in the early 1950s to test the feasibility of designing and building homes with central air conditioning for middle class buyers. Up until that time, central air conditioning was generally only offered in more expensive homes, and the need for more homes …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:42 p.m.
Sept. 28, 2020

D.6.0 - 2507 Park View Drive original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

D.6 - 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS HDP-2020-0352 2507 PARK VIEW DRIVE PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1954 house in Austin’s Air-Conditioned Village. ARCHITECTURE The house is one-story, designed in the Ranch style with a combination of board-and-batten, and a horizontally-laid random narrow stone course veneer wainscoting across the front of the house; a side-gabled roof with deep eaves shades the structure. Fenestration consists of metal-framed horizontally-sliding window to the right of the single-leaf glazed front door (a modern replacement) and then a series of awning-style wood-frame windows above the stone wainscoting. The house has an attached garage at the far right end of the facade, once an open double carport. RESEARCH This house is the Carrier house, designed by the Carrier Corporation in conjunction with local architect H.D. Powers, and built by local contractor Andrew S. Patton. H.D. Powers had worked for the Federal Housing Administration prior to this job, and designed five houses in the Air-Conditioned Village for various air conditioning manufacturers. All of his houses had masonry veneer exteriors and were built on a slab. Powers and Patton collaborated on a house featured in the 1953 Parade of Homes. Austin’s Air-Conditioned Village was the largest of one of several experiments throughout the country in the early 1950s to test the feasibility of designing and building homes with central air conditioning for the middle class. Up until that time, central air conditioning was something that was only offered in high-end homes, and the need for more homes for returning servicemen spurred an increase in developing technology for new middle-class homeowners. The Air-Conditioned Village in Austin was specifically envisioned as a neighborhood of relatively modest, if technologically-advanced houses, all with a price tag affordable to many middle-class buyers and as a test case for the cost effectiveness for modest homes in a warm and humid climate. Typical of the early purchasers of the houses in the Air-Conditioned Village, the house at 2507 Park View Drive was initially occupied by Cyrus and Dorothy Brown, who only lived here for a short period of time. His occupation was not listed in the Austin city directory, but it appears that Cyrus Brown was a lumberman from Shallowater, near Lubbock. He does not appear in city directories either before or after the edition of 1954, and he died in Vernon, Texas in 1981. His death certificate noted that …

Scraped at: Sept. 25, 2020, 12:43 p.m.