(cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:10) PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION (cid:10) Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to do so. This meeting (cid:10) will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call (cid:10) the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or (cid:10) environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. (cid:10) During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application' 's hearing to a later date, or recommend (cid:10) approval or denial of the application (cid:10) If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or (cid:10) continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required (cid:10) A board or commission' 's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a (cid:10) person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to (cid:10) appeal the decision (cid:10) interest to a board or commission by (cid:10) An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an (cid:10) delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues (cid:10) of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or (cid:10) appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: (cid:10) occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property …
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION (cid:10) Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to participate in a public hearing, you are not required to do so. This meeting (cid:10) will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. Email or call (cid:10) the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or (cid:10) environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. (cid:10) During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application' 's hearing to a later date, or recommend (cid:10) approval or denial of the application (cid:10) If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or (cid:10) continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required (cid:10) A board or commission' 's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a (cid:10) person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to (cid:10) appeal the decision (cid:10) interest to a board or commission by (cid:10) An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an (cid:10) delivering a written statement to the board or commission before or during the public hearing that generally identifies the issues (cid:10) of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or (cid:10) appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: (cid:10) occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; (cid:10) is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or (cid:10) is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within (cid:10) 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development. (cid:10) A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal (cid:10) form may be available from the responsible department. (cid:10) For additional information on the City of Austin' 's land development process, please visit our website …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-067051 1805 E. 3RD STREET HERRERA HOUSE B.6 – 1 Replace the front doors and paint the historic house; construct a 2-story rear addition. Previous restoration work was approved administratively. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project involves six parts: ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Repair and Alterations 1) Replace the non-historic front doors with 2-over-2 glazed doors. 2) Replace the metal roof with composition shingles with a wood-shake profile. 3) Paint the house to match the historic color (yellow). 4) Reconstruct the rear (south) wall after it was removed beyond the scope of approvals. The proposed new wall includes a 3-panel fully glazed sliding door and a window opening with a 2-over-2 window (sash material pending). 5) Construct a 4’3” deep concrete patio behind the rear (south) wall of the historic house. 6) Construct a 2-story rear addition. The addition is set back approximately 24’ from the front wall and has a footprint of 265 square feet. It is clad in horizontal hardiplank siding and capped by a front-gabled roof, with a slope and eave depth matching those of the historic house. Windows are sliding and fixed vinyl-sash. A garage on the ground floor is accessed by a glazed roll-up door on the rear (south) wall. One-story, L-plan, cross-gabled building; vertical board-and-batten siding; 4:4 wood-sash windows; shed porch with two entry doors; National Folk style. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: General Standards 1.1 Do not remove intact historic material from the exterior of a building. 1.2 Always attempt repair first. Replacement should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary, and for the smallest area possible. 1.3 When historic material must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, replacement material should look the same, perform reliably within the existing construction, and, in most cases, be made of the same material. The proposed project repairs and retains historic wood siding, windows, and trim. Where replacement of boards or battens is necessary due to deterioration, replacements will match historic materials and profiles. The project meets these standards. 1.4 Do not attempt to re-create an architectural detail or element without proof that it existed on the building historically. The proposed project replaces plain wood porch posts with …
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maximum ADU area 953.7 ADU allowed? ADU proposed? Project ADU area Difference ADU L2 area Max ADU L2 area Difference Yes No 0 -953.7 0 550 -550 Total Remodeled Floor Area (SF) (work within existing habitable square footage) G002 General Notes G003 Standard Details G004 Standard Details G005 Standard Details G006 Environmental Details G007 Door Schedules G008 Window Schedules A000 Site Plan A101 Floor Plans, Level 01 A102 Floor Plans, Level 02 A104 Roof Plans A105 MEP Plans, Level 01 A106 MEP Plans, Level 02 A201 Elevations, Bldg 1 A202 Elevations, Bldg 1 A203 Elevations, Bldg 1 A204 Elevations, Bldg 1 PROJECT CALCULATION AND APPLICATION SHEET FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF AUSTIN (REFERENCE A000 FOR SITE PLAN) PROPERTY INFORMATION (p1 of application) SITE DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION (p2 of application) Address Tax Parcel ID Legal Description Zoning District Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (FT) Historic District REQUIRED REVIEWS 1805 E 3rd St 78702 #191991 Lot 3 Blk 2 Cypher Subdivision SF-3-NP/SF-3-H-NP 6358 45.94 N/A Area Description 1st floor conditioned (enclosed) area 2nd floor conditioned (enclosed) area 3rd floor conditioned (enclosed) area (including attics) Yes/No Covered parking (garage or carport, attached or detached) Neighborhood Planning Area East Cesar Chavez Basements Existing SF to remain New or Added SF Total SF Remodeled SF Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Bldg 1 Bldg 2 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 Total ADU GROSS FLOOR AREA (PER COA DSD, CALCULATED PER LDC 25-1- 21, [46]. AREAS w/ CEILING HEIGHTS BTWN 5' AND 6' NOT COUNTED.) TABLE OF CONTENTS G001 Cover Sheet/Project Calculations Is project participating in SMART Housing? Does project have Green Building requirement? Is site within an Airport Overlay Zone? Does this site have a septic system? Does the structure exceed 3,600 total under roof? Is this property within 200 feet of a hazardous pipeline? Is this siite located within an Erosion Hazard Zone? Is this property within 100 feet of the 100-year floodplain? Are there trees 19" or greater in diameter on/adjacent to the property? ---> If yes, how many? ---> Was there a pre-development consultation for the Tree Review? Root zone Canopy Removal Uncertain ---> Proposed impacts to trees Is this site in the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 2021-058680 PR HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4006 1/2 AVENUE B B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story rear addition to a one-story contributing building. Replace existing windows and doors. 1) Partially demolish rear of residence. 2) Construct a two-story addition. The proposed addition is set back approximately 15’ from the front wall of the house. It has a compound gabled roof with shed dormers at secondary elevations. It is clad in horizontal wood siding. Single and paired 1:1 wood windows are regularly spaced throughout. The addition’s eaves feature exposed rafter tails and brackets to mimic existing. 3) Replace windows with 1:1s. ARCHITECTURE STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The existing building is a one-story Craftsman bungalow with horizontal wood siding, 4:6 paired and single windows, a partial-width porch supported by tapered columns, and a gabled roof with exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces at eaves. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2: Retention of Historic Style. Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism. Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing or Potentially Contributing Structures. Preserve the historic fabric: Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. The proposed addition retains some aspects of the building’s historic style but changes its scale. It is differentiated in scale and placement but includes exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces that may not be appropriate for new construction. The proposed cladding appears to match the existing building’s horizontal siding. However, existing historic-age windows will be replaced. 3.1: Front of Houses. Retain the historic facade of a house in terms of door and window placement and exterior wall materials. Repair damaged or deteriorated exterior wall materials where reasonably possible. If replacement of exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material identical in size, profile, and appearance as the historic material. 3.2: Doors and Doorways. Do not enlarge, alter, or relocate single doorways on the façade of …
Alley N 30 degrees 00' 00" E 37.50' 10' rear building setback line full CRZ 27" diameter Post Oak tree 1/4 CRZ One-Story Frame Garage elev. 609.50' elev. 609.25' 1/2 CRZ 1/4 CRZ FULL CRZ 5' high protective chain link fence - typical 1/2 CRZ roof overhang 13", 15" and 22" diameter Cedar Elms 5.0' uncovered wood deck and steps 5' high protective chain link fence - typical 5' high protective chain link fence - typical provide 8" deep layer of mulch within entire root zone area elev. 609.75' up 6.5' 6 ' Sun Room 5.8' elev. 609.5' provide 8" deep layer of mulch within entire root zone area " B " l e c r a P C D R - ' 0 4 " A " l e c r a P C D R - ' 0 4 0 0 . 0 3 1 ' E " 0 0 0 0 s e e r g e d 0 6 N 20" diameter Post Oak tree 1/4 CRZ elev. 609.75' - highest in Parcel "B" 1/2 CRZ full CRZ 5' sideyard setback line elev. 610.25' - highest in Parcel "A" Bedroom 2 cu pan. ref. Kitchen elev. 609.5' Bath 2 Dining roof overhang closet u p Living Room Finish Floor Elevation 612.0' Study Covered Front Porch 0 0 . 0 3 1 W ' " 0 0 0 0 s e e r g e d 0 6 S elev. 610.25' up elev. 609.75' elev. 609.75' 1/2 CRZ FULL CRZ existing concrete sidewalk ' 3 . 3 2 porch roof overhang dumpster g n i g a t s s l a i r e t a m a e r a e n i l k c a b t e s d r a y t n o r f ' 5 2 port. toilet S 30 degrees 00' 00" W 37.50' property line 1/4 CRZ 5' high protective chain link fence - typical existing concrete sidewalk REVISED SITE PLAN Scale if printed on 11x17 sheet: 1/16" = 1' - 0" Scale if printed on 24x36 sheet: 1/8" = 1' - 0" N 03/15/2021 Legal Description: Lot 26 and the south 12.5' of Lot 27, Block 7, Hyde Park Addition, A Subdivision in Travis County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 1, Page 75 of the plat records of Travis …
ZONING: LOT SIZE: PROPERTY ID: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 JOBE HOUSE RESUB SF-3-NP 7,246 S.F. 443354 NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREA: FRONT YARD SETBACK: SIDE YARD SETBACK: STREET SIDE YARD SETBACK: REAR YARD SETBACK: MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN 25 FEET 5 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET 40% 45% Sheet List ARCHITECTURAL AS-101 A-101 A-111 A-121 A-201 A-202 A-411 SITE PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN REFLECTED CEILING PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL S-100 S-200 S-300 FOUNDATION PLAN & DETAILS ROOF FRAMING & BRACING PLAN BRACING DETAILS BUILDING COVERAGE AREA DESCRIPTION 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR BASEMENT COVERED PARKING COVERED DECK COVERED PORCH COVERED PATIO BALCONY OTHER ROOFED AREAS TOTAL BUILDING AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE EXISTING SQ. FT 1700 N/A N/A N/A 0 0 489 0 0 0 NEW/ADDED SQ.FT 331 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRIVEWAY SIDEWALKS UNCOVERED PATIO UNCOVERED DECK OTHER FLATWORK (POOL COPING, RETAINING WALLS, ETC.) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2927 331 331 331 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2189 2189 150 588 0 0 0 0 0 30.21% 34.78% 40.40% 44.96% LOT SIZE 7246 POOL (SURFACE AREA) SPA (SURFACE AREA) EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE % TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE % EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE % TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE % TOTAL SQ. FT 2031 0 0 0 0 0 489 0 0 0 2520 2520 150 588 0 0 0 3258 0 0 hatch + ulland owen a r c h i t e c t s 1010 East 11th Street Austin, Texas 78702 T: 512.474.8548 F: 512.474.8643 www.huoarchitects.com Civil Engineer: .... .... .... .... Structural Engineer: GreenEarth Enginnering, Inc. 2500 W. Willian Cannon Dr, Suite 201 Austin, TX 78745 512.289.8086 Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Engineer: .... .... .... .... h t 9 t s a E 3 1 1 1 2 0 7 8 7 X T , n i t s u A NOTE: This document, the ideas and design incorporated herein are and shall remain the property of h+uo architects. These documents are not to be used or altered, in whole or in part, for other than the original intended use, nor are they to be assigned to any third party without written permission from h+uo architects. NOTE: By act of submitting a bid for the proposed contract, the bidder warrants that the bidder, and all subcontractors and material suppliers he intends to use have carefully …
Residential New Construction and Addition Permit Application Property Information Project Address: Legal Description: Zoning District: DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment Download application before entering information. Tax Parcel ID: Lot Area (sq ft): Historic District (if applicable): Neighborhood Plan Area (if applicable): Required Reviews Is project participating in S.M.A.R.T. Housing? (If yes, attach signed certification letter from NHCD, and signed conditional approval letter from Austin Energy Green Building) Is this site within an Airport Overlay Zone? (If yes, approval through Aviation is required) Y Y N N Does project have a Green Building requirement? (If yes, attach signed conditional approval letter from Austin Energy Green Building) Y N Does this site have a septic system? Y N (If yes, submit a copy of approved septic permit. OSSF review required) Does the structure exceed 3,600 square feet total under roof? Is this property within 200 feet of a hazardous pipeline? Y Y N N (If yes, Fire review is required) (If yes, Fire review is required) Is this site located within an Erosion Hazard Zone? Is this property within 100 feet of the 100-year floodplain? Y N (If yes, EHZ review is required) Y N (Proximity to floodplain may require additional review time.) Are there trees 19” or greater in diameter on/adjacent to the property? If yes, how many?_____ ( Provide plans with a tree survey, tree review required.) Y N Was there a pre-development consultation for the Tree Review? Y N Proposed impacts to trees: (Check all that apply) Root zone Canopy Removal None/Uncertain Is this site in the Capital View Corridor? (If yes, a preliminary review through land use is needed to determine if full view corridor review is required.) Does this site currently have: water availability? wastewater availability? Y Y Y N N N Is this site within the Residential Design and Compatibility Standards Ordinance Boundary Area? (LDC 25-2 Subchapter F) Y N (If no, contact Austin Water Utility to apply for water/wastewater taps and/or service extension request.) (If yes, submit approved auxiliary and potable plumbing plans.) Does this site have or will it have an auxiliary water source? (Auxiliary water supplies are wells, rainwater harvesting, river water, lake water, reclaimed water, etc.) Does this site require a cut or fill in excess of four (4) feet? Y N Y N (If yes, contact the Development Assistance Center for …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT WITHIN A NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-055590 WILLOW-SPENCE HISTORIC DISTRICT 902 WILLOW STREET C.1 - 1 Modify the west elevation of the existing contributing structure; demolish a deteriorated non- compatible rear addition and outbuildings; construct a 2.5-story ADU in the back yard. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The applicant proposes the demolition of a non-compatible, although possibly of historic age, deteriorated rear frame addition and small wooden outbuildings. The applicant further proposes the reconfiguration of the west elevation of the house, which faces onto an open lot adjacent to the north-bound service road for IH-35. The plans for this project show the removal of windows on this elevation and the installation of a horizontal fixed-sash window along the center of this elevation. The main focus of this proposal, however, is the construction of a 2.5-story ADU in back of the house. The proposed ADU will have a footprint of 668 square feet and a height of just over 26 feet; it will have stucco and hardi-plank siding, a composition shingle roof with metal roof accents, and multiple gables. Fenestration is a combination of vinyl and aluminum-clad wood windows. The ADU has a contemporary design but enough traditional features that make it compatible with the design of the turn of the century contributing house. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation are used to evaluate projects in National Register historic districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Reconfiguration of the fenestration pattern on the west elevation of the house will compromise the character-defining features of the contributing house. The proposal does not comply with this standard. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposed reconfiguration of the west elevation does not comply with this standard. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of …
32' maximum height per CoA Highest point of highest ridge CoA Highpoint L1 TPlate " 0 - ' 2 3 " 7 - ' 2 2 " 5 - ' 9 1 " 8 1 5 - ' 0 1 " 3 - ' 2 470'-3" BLDG 1 FFE 468'-0" BLDG 1 AAG 12 6 6:12 KEYED NOTES. 01 New metal coping. Exposure 6". New metal flashing. Exposure 6" minimum. New metal railing at exterior porch or deck. Minimum height 36" above finish floor. Maximum opening 3.5". New parapet at exterior porch or deck. Minimum 36" above finish floor. New through-wall scupper. New metal downspout. Steel column (ref: structural). 02 03 04 05 06 07 CODE REFERENCES (City of Austin RDCS area only). LDC TITLE 25, CHAPTER 25-2, SUBCHAPTER F, ARTICLE 2.6, E, 4, b, (i): A structure may not extend beyond a setback plane...except for gables or a shed roof, with a total horizontal length of not more than 18 feet on each side of the building, measured along the intersection with the setback plane. ARCHITECT'S NOTE: NO PROVISIONS FOR "HABITABILITY OF SPACE" ARE MADE IN THE LANGUAGE CITED ABOVE. IE: ANY ENCLOSED SPACE UNDER THE SHED ROOF MAY PROTRUDE, INCLUDING SPACE USED FOR VERTICAL CIRCULATION. LDC TITLE 25, CHAPTER 25-2, SUBCHAPTER F, ARTICLE 3.4.1 Height shall be measured vertically from the average of the highest and lowest grades adjacent to the building to...for a pitched or hip roof, the gabled roof or dormer with the highest average height. 1 Elevation, Bldg 1, Front Scale 18" = 1'-0" @ 11x17 Scale 14" = 1'-0" @ 24x36 MATERIALS LEGEND. SEAL OF ARCHITECT. SEAL OF MUNICIPAL APPROVAL. Standing-seam metal roofing Composition-shingle roofing Cement-board or RealTrim fascia Cement-board trim or RealTrim 6" horizontal cement board 6" horizontal stained wood 24" vertical cement board Stone veneer (ashlar bond) ISSUE DATE 02 Feb. 2021 DISCLAIMERS. issued under the seal of is This document WILLIAM LAWRENCE HODGE, Texas architect 19074. This document is not for permitting, regulatory approval, pricing or construction unless the seal and signature of the Architect are This document is not approved for visible. construction unless a seal of municipal approval is visible. No set of construction documents can contain all information required to construct a is project. required. That which is shown in one sheet, applies to all sheets in this set by reference. The information in G001 through G008 (inclusive) …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICTS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-063857 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT 3204 BEVERLY ROAD C.2 – 1 Partially demolish 1940 contributing house; construct a second-story rear addition, reconfigure porch, and replace windows. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS cement siding. square posts and a central gable. 1) Construction of a second-story addition over a rear portion of the home. The side-gabled addition will be clad in fiber- 2) Removal of asymmetrical front porch with decorative iron supports, and replacement with a full-width porch with four 3) Replacement of 8:8 and 6:6 double-hung wood windows with 2:2 fiberglass-clad windows within existing openings. Replacement of the solid wood front door with a six-light door. Salvage and storage of the existing windows and door, in the event that a future owner should wish to pursue restoration. 4) Retention of limestone cladding on the front and a limestone chimney on the side of the house. Replacement of existing wood and aluminum siding on the sides and rear of the house with fiber-cement siding. 5) Installation of standing-seam metal roofing to replace existing composition shingles. This side-gabled Minimal Ranch house has random ashlar limestone cladding on the façade and horizontal siding on the sides and rear elevations. The house has an asymmetrically placed partial-width front porch with ornamental iron supports. A one-car garage abuts the north side of the house. On the front elevation, 8:8 light wood windows have decorative shutters. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The house was built in 1940 for William Deans and Agatha Anderson. William Anderson sold real estate for W. Murray Graham, a partner in the development of portions of Bryker Woods and other subdivisions in the Old West Austin National Register district. By 1944, the Andersons had moved to 3100 Beverly Rd., and 3204 Beverly Rd. was occupied by renters. Harold D. and Barbara M. Bowman owned the house from the mid-1940s to mid-1950s. Harold Bowman was a laboratory tech and later a serologist for the State Health Department, and Barbara Bowman taught at Govalle School. Subsequently, Andre and Simone Gerard owned the house. Andre Gerard was a Holocaust survivor who emigrated from France and gained U.S. citizenship. He was a partner in the law firm Garcia & Gerard. By 1958, the owners were Warren C. and Betty A. Bair. Warren Bair was a manager in a family office supply business. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Repair and alterations The …
PORTION OF ROOF TO BE REMOVED WINDOWS TO BE REMOVED AND EXTENDED EAST ELEVATION (Front) 3204 Beverly RdAustin, TX 78703 WINDOW TO BE REMOVED SOUTH ELEVATION 3204 Beverly RdAustin, TX 78703 PORTION OF BACK OF HOUSE TO BE REMOVED & REPLACED APPROX AREA OF NEW WINDOW WEST ELEVATION 3204 Beverly RdAustin, TX 78703 NORTH ELEVATION 3204 Beverly RdAustin, TX 78703
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 24, 2021 GF-2021-060230 CLARKSVILLE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1805 WATERSTON AVENUE C.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1952 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story side-gabled house with partial-width gabled porch, 2:2:2 picture window, board-and-batten siding, and attached carport. The house at 1805 Waterston Avenue was built around 1952 for Kelly Louis and Johnnie Mary Jackson Meador. Kelly Meador taught vocational studies at the Texas State Blind, Deaf, and Orphan School (later the Texas State School for the Deaf). A pastor’s son, Meador was an active member of the Metropolitan AME congregation. The Meadors were both Tillotson College alumni and contributed to the United Negro College Fund as fundraising committee members. They also operated the Economy Radio and TV Service, a repair shop, around 1959. STAFF COMMENTS The building contributes to the Clarksville National Register Historic District according to a 2018 historic resource survey. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property is associated with Texas School for the Deaf teacher Kelly Louis Meador. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. New construction at this address must be reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission prior to demolition permit release. LOCATION MAP C.3 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.3 – 3 C.3 – 4 Realtor.com, 2021 Occupancy History City Directory Research, April 2021 Kelly L. and Johnnie M. Meador, owners Economy Radio & TV Service Kelly L. Meador, owner Teacher, State Blind Deaf & Orphan School Kelly L. and Johnnie M. Meador, owners …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-064125 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1602 WESTOVER ROAD C.4 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Partially demolish and construct an addition to side and rear of ca. 1937 contributing building. Demolish single-story garage and replace with two-story garage. 1) Partially demolish north and east elevations. Demolish existing garage. 2) Construct a one-story side and rear addition immediately beyond ridgeline. The proposed addition is clad in horizontal wood siding. Its compound gabled roof is clad in asphalt shingles to match existing. 3) Replace existing asphalt shingle roof in-kind. 4) Replace wood windows with aluminum-clad multilight windows. Proposed windows at main façade will match existing. Proposed side elevation windows will include fabric awnings. 5) Replace existing front door with partially glazed front door. 6) Construct a two-story gabled-roof garage. The proposed garage is clad in board-and-batten siding, with shingle roof to match main house and aluminum-clad fixed and casement multilight windows. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story side-gabled Colonial Revival/Cape Cod Revival cottage clad in horizontal wood siding, with 8:8 wood windows and partial-width central shed-roof porch. The house at 1602 Westover Road was constructed in 1937. Its first occupants were John Franklin and Gertrude Hutter. Franklin Hutter worked for the University of Texas as director of the accounting division before becoming an auditor. Gertrude Hutter was an active member of the Austin Woman’s Club and Texas Federation of Women’s Clubs. By 1949, the Hutters had sold the property to Byron F. and Mildred D. Kerr. Byron Kerr, who began his career at Montgomery Ward, worked as a factory repair specialist and manufacturing representative. The Kerrs lived in the home with their two children until 1957, when ownership passed to Ruth Escamilla. Escamilla, a veteran employee of the Austin National Bank. Escamilla worked in the bank’s savings department from 1917 until her retirement in 1958. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Residential additions The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register Historic Districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.1 Locate additions to the rear and sides of historic buildings to minimize visual impact. 1.2 Step back side additions from the front wall a distance that preserves the shape of the historic building from the primary street. 1.5 Minimize the loss …
