D.1.b - 401 E 5th St - citizen comments — original pdf
Backup
Historic Landmark Commission Homepage
D.1.c - 401 E 5th St - citizen comments — original pdf
Backup
D.3.1 - 1611 Canterbury - Plans — original pdf
Backup
D.3.2 - 1611 Canterbury - Historic Report — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JUNE 28, 2021 PR-2021-066307 1611 CANTERBURY STREET D.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1904 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story, wing-and-gable plan, frame house with a partial-width independent porch on ornamental metal posts; front door with a transom; single 1:1 fenestration; synthetic siding. The house appears to have been built around 1904 for Nathaniel Hessey, a pioneer merchant and jeweler in Austin. Hessey worked for John A. Jackson, a jeweler and silversmith at the time he first appears in city directories at this address. From 1904 until his death in 1908, he is listed as a pawnbroker and jeweler. His wife, Tennie, then continued to reside in this house, but also is listed at 2309 San Antonio Street, a house where she also took in boarders. Tennie Hessey resided here sporadically, more constantly in her later years; she died in 1949. Tennie Hessey’s daughter, Helen Duval, is also listed at this address in her mother’s later years. She was married to Easton Duval, a design engineer for the highway department. In the late 1950s, the family sold the house to Frank and Pauline Casarez, who lived here at least through the early 1990s. Frank Casarez was an optician for Dickinson Optical for many years. STAFF COMMENTS The East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016) recommends this house as contributing to a potential local or NR historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity with the exception of the siding, doors, and windows. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined it may meet the criterion for architectural significance but does not meet any other criterion squarely. a. Architecture. The house represents a residential type that once was common in middle-class Austin neighborhoods at the turn of the century, but has become rare with time and development. This house has lost its integrity of materials over the years, but has the potential for restoration, as all of its architectural elements remain intact; the house has architectural significance in that it is an increasingly rare example of its type. b. Historical association. The house does not have the required historical associations necessary for designation as a historic landmark. The house first associated with an early jeweler and pawnbroker; after his death, his widow …
D.8.a - 6416 N Lamar Blvd - citizen comments — original pdf
Backup
D.9.a - 916 Bouldin Ave - citizen comments — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Matthew Coldwell Thursday, June 24, 2021 6:23 PM Allen, Amber Re: 916 Bouldin Avenue - HLC Meeting *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Amber, I found and read the report for 916 Bouldin Ave. It is well done, thank you! At this time I do not wish to speak. I am not a good speaker. But please record me as an interested party that is opposed to granting a demolition permit at this time. I ask that the commission postpone any decision about this matter until the Neighborhood Association has had time to digest the loss of this structure. We might even consider applying for a historical conservation district for our neighborhood as your report recommends. The fine report your office just published does not gives enough time to consider the contents of the report and formulate an opinion before Monday, June 28, 2021. With sincere thanks and appreciation to you and your office, George Matthew Coldwell 1
A.1.10 - 2708 Scenic Dr - Petition and Letter of Support — original pdf
Backup
A.1.5 - 2708 Scenic Dr - Pfeiffer Letter — original pdf
Backup
A.1.7 - 2708 Scenic Dr - Sinclair Black Letter — original pdf
June 24th, 2021 Armbrust & Brown, PLLC Attn: Richard Suttle 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300 Austin, Texas 78701-2744 Dear Richard Suttle at Armbrust & Brown, I was asked to tour the home at 2708 Scenic Drive, designed by Roland Roessner in the early 1950s to form an opinion as to its potential architectural significance and its general physical condition. I did not attempt to evaluate the structural condition of the residence. I briefly worked for Mr. Roessner, a professor, while I was an architecture student at the University of Texas at Austin in the early 1960s therefore, I have firsthand knowledge of his design work. This residence is an example of the early mid-century modern genre characterized by practical, expedient, and general cost-effective materials and detailing, imported from California. The home is significantly smaller than all his notable designs and cannot be considered one of his significant works. I was completely unfamiliar with this residence and previously unaware of its existence. Furthermore, there is a featureless addition to the home certainly not designed by Mr. Roessner. Historic designation notwithstanding, salvaging this home would require extensive upgrades to achieve even moderate energy efficiency as there is an approximately 40 foot long, west-facing wall of single-pane, fixed glass among countless other issues affecting efficiency. If this were in fact an example of his more significant work such as 7 Green Lanes or The Oaks Apartments (previously demolished by UT) I would certainly say it should be preserved. Sincerely, Sinclair Black, FAIA Principal, Black + Vernooy Architecture and Urban Design Director Emeritus, Congress for the New Urbanism, Central Texas Chapter Professor Emeritus, The University of Texas at Austin School of Architecture Congress for the New Urbanism Athena Medal for Lifetime Achievement Texas Society of Architects Lifetime Achievement Award 2 0 8 W E S T 4 TH S TR E E T , S U I T E 3 A A U S TI N , T E X A S U S A 7 8 7 0 1 ( 5 1 2 ) 4 7 4 - 1 63 2
A.1.8 - 2708 Scenic Dr - Jerry Garcia Letter — original pdf
June 25, 2021 Mr. Wayne Hollingsworth Armbrust and Brown. PLLC 100 Congress Avenue Suite 1300 Austin, Texas 78701 RE: 2708 Scenic Drive Mr. Hollingsworth: At your request I reviewed the documents you provided, and I have the following initial comments: Based on the photos and inspections alone the home appears to be in considerable disrepair from neglect and exposure. Tax records indicate that the original house was built in 1955 and the annex in 1967. Both building has ample examples of the structures not meeting current standards. Any attempts to bring these buildings into current standards will certainly impact the original fabric of the architecture. A great deal of the exposed framing will require replacement and proper engineering. Framing joinery is insufficient requiring joist hangers and other visually unappealing solutions. Introducing proper egress, handrail heights and handrail openings will greatly impact the original intent. At what point is the original architecture lost? The soil conditions along Scenic Drive are poor at best. Most homes in the area require pier depths in the order of 20’ deep. I recommend that the slab elevations of the residence is performed to determine if proper performance of the structure is in play. These are but a few comments based on the available documentation thus far. I’m happy to provide more commentary as additional information surfaces. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office at 512-499-0919. Sincerely, Jerry Garcia, P.E. License #67435 Firm No: F-3323 6926 N. Lamar Austin, TX 78752 T: 512.499.0919 F: 512.320.8521 www.structurestx.com
A.1.9 - 2708 Scenic Dr - Escobedo Letter — original pdf
Backup
A.1.c - 2708 Scenic Dr - citizen comments — original pdf
Backup
B.1.a - 1501 Northwood Rd - citizen comments — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Bill W Monday, June 28, 2021 10:46 AM PAZ Preservation HistRevComm@BWNA.groups.io C14H-2010-0009; HR-2021-041008 VOSS HOUSE 1501 NORTHWOOD ROAD *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** The Historic Review Committee of the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association was not notified of this proposed change, thus we have not had the opportunity to do other than review the online documents. We note that the Voss House has a Landmark designation and that some of the issues regarding this were addressed, but apparently not to the full satisfaction of the Architectural Review Committee. If the proposed addition will remove the Voss House from its Landmark designation, we would object and ask that the addition/remodel be given additional scrutiny. Thank you. Bill Woods Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Historic Review Committee Bill Woods Living on Earth is expensive, but it does include a free trip around the sun. This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient, please notify the sender. All comments are the sender’s personal opinion unless otherwise noted. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
B.3.3 - 4006.5 Avenue B - Addition Proposal — original pdf
4006 ½ Avenue B Addition Materials for Historic Landmark Commission 6/28/2021 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 1 Plans updated Architectural Review Committee feedback has been implemented Dormers removed Roof pitch reduced to minimize visual impact Decorative features to remain on original structure only 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 2 Street view Existing Proposed 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 3 Oblique View Existing Proposed *Next house on North side is >50 feet away 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 4 Initial design proposal 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 5 Design modifications Original submission Current design Changes from initial submission: 1) Dormers removed, 2) Second floor reduced by setback, 3) addition roof pitch reduced resulting in approximately 2.5 feet peak height reduction 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 6 Proposed Design 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 7 Elevation updates Proposed Dormers removed Second floor reduced (zoning) Roof pitch reduced (2.5’ height reduction) Original submission 4006 1/2 AVENUE B ADDITION 8
B.9.b - 2401 Givens Ave - owners comments — original pdf
Backup
C.11.a - 1415 W 10th St - citizen comments — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Adrienne Domas Goldsberry Monday, June 28, 2021 11:18 AM PAZ Preservation Re: case no. PR-2021-078188 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Thank you, Amber. I am unfortunately unabel to participate in this evening's meeting. Is there a way that you or another staff member can pass along my comments to the Commission members and have them read at the hearing? They are below. If there is another way I should submit them, let me know. We live at 1417 W. 10th St; the property immediately to the west of this project. We generally agree with staff's concerns/comments about the proposed design, as listed in response to the City of Austin's standards for review of a project within a historic district. As staff noted, the project is considerably larger and different in style than most if not all other buildings in the Old West Austin neighborhood. The steel fencing is not compatible with the neighborhood and is rather 'harsh' in a family‐friendly, walkable area, although we appreciate the architect moving the fencing along 10th farther back and behind landscaping in response to our feedback. While we understand the owner's desire to build a large modern house on a large lot, we would continue to ask that he find ways to make the design ‐ through landscaping, building materials, etc. more compatible with the feel of the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Adrienne & Kirk Goldsberry On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 9:27 AM PAZ Preservation <Preservation@austintexas.gov> wrote: If you’d like to register to speak at the meeting, please provide me with the names, email addresses, and phone numbers of all who wish to speak. Otherwise, you can tune it to the meeting on ATXN (channel 9). Hi Adrienne, Thanks! Amber Allen Planner II, Historic Preservation Office City of Austin – Housing & Planning Department 1 T: 512.974.3393 E: Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov From: Adrienne Domas Goldsberry Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 10:28 PM To: PAZ Preservation <Preservation@austintexas.gov> Subject: case no. PR‐2021‐078188 Hello Amber, *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** We would like to participate in the meeting for the permit requested at 1415 W. 10th Street. We live in the neighboring house to the west, at 1417 W. 10th St. We would respectfully request that the applicant construct a house that is compatible in size, scale, and design with the neighborhood. …
C.8.2 - 1512 Gaston - HistoricReviewApplication — original pdf
RECLAIMED BRICK FROM ORIGINAL HOME, STUCCO CHIMNEY, PAINTED WOOD TRIM, WOOD CLAD WINDOWS, COMP. SHINGLES WOOD COLUMN & BEAMS, COMP. SHINGLES STUCCO, WOOD TRIM, WOOD COLUMN, WOOD CLAD WINDOWS, COMP. SHINGLES
C.9.a - 4200 Lullwood - citizen comment — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: ava waters Sunday, June 27, 2021 11:43 AM PAZ Preservation kerry Morgan; ava Waters Case# HR-21-082905 -4200 Lullwood RD. public hearing:Historic Landmark Commission June 28, 2021 Contact: Amber Allen *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** We are residents directly behind 4200 Lullwood. We strongly object to a second story remodel and or addition. The neighborhood consists of SINGLE STORY, single family homes built in the 1940’s and 1950’s. A second story would allow for and change the landscape of the neighborhood and is located approximately 30’ from my fence line. Thank you, Kerrin Morgan Ava Waters 1302 Wilshire Blvd. Austin, TX. 78722 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Citizen Communication - PC_Preservation & Affordable Housing San Antonio — original pdf
OPPORTUNITY AT RISK San Antonio’s Older Affordable Housing Stock Prepared for the San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation Completed by PlaceEconomics 2019 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Overview of Housing Affordability Oldering Housing Stock and Affordable Housing 1 2 11 42 43 54 56 OLDER HOUSING STOCK AND AFFORDABILITY: SAN ANTONIO Approach to Analysis The Basics Demolition Risk Analysis A Closer Look at Factors Affecting Demolition Risk CONCLUSION POSSIBLE TOOLS Financial Incentives Financial Disincentives Regulatory Knowledge and Planning Civic Engagement Strategic Home Repair Direct Action RECOMMENDATION MATRIX ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND METHODOLOGY 57 APPENDICES Executive Summary This study was commissioned by the San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation to understand the contribution of housing stock built before 1960 towards affordable housing. Significant findings include: • One in three San Antonio households is spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing and nearly half of all renters meet this “cost burdened” threshold. • Over the last decade, while median household income increased 1.9% per year, housing prices increased at 4.7% per year. • While San Antonio is experiencing greater than national average growth in jobs and housing, most of the new homes are large and expensive and much of the job growth is in lower wage jobs. The existing pre-1960 housing stock is providing largely unsubsidized and unprotected affordable housing. • • Every week over the last ten years, San Antonio has lost 3 • units of pre-1960 housing to demolition. Twenty-two percent (22%) of all housing units were constructed prior to 1960. • • Pre-1960 homes are smaller than newer homes with a greater share of pre-1960 housing in fair or poor condition than is housing built in 1960 or later. Thirty-three percent (33%) of the households making 60% Area Median Income or less live in neighborhoods with a concentration of pre-1960 housing, including a larger share who identify as Hispanic. The pre-1960 housing stock in San Antonio is home to a large share of long-term residents. • • Single family, renter occupied structures in fair and poor condition are the most at-risk of demolition. • Vacancy rates in older, historically redlined areas of the city are higher and homeownership rates, rents, and general condition are lower than the rest of the city. Given these facts, the use of older, existing pre-1960 housing stock must be a central component of an affordable housing strategy. 22% of all housing units …
D.10.a - 3009 Bowman Ave - applicant requested postponement — original pdf
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Ross Rathgeber Friday, June 25, 2021 2:09 PM Allen, Amber; Rice, Andrew 3009 Bowman Avenue Request for Postponement *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Amber and Andrew The demolition application for 3009 Bowman Avenue is on the June 28, 2021 agenda of the Historic Landmark Commission (item D.10.). My client needs time to evaluate your recommendation. Accordingly, I hereby request postponement until the July 26, 2021 meeting. Please let me know if I will need to call in for the meeting (assume postponement requests will be heard first). If so, I will be at the fishing cabin that my wife inherited from her grandmother in very remote part of Colorado. The phone number I will be calling from is (719) 658‐2805. It is possible the phone may not working when we get there in which case I will let you know an alternate number as soon as I am able. Thank You Ross M. Rathgeber Vice‐President Southwest Destructors ‐ A Division of Southwest Constructors, Inc. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1