CASE NUMBER: C14H-2023-0136 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATES: November 1, 2023; December 13, 2023 (postponed); January 10, 2024 (postponed); February 7, 2024 PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-supported) HISTORIC NAME: Green & White Grocery WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1201 East 7th Street/607 Waller Street ZONING CHANGE: TOD-NP to TOD-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from transit-oriented development- neighborhood plan (TOD-NP) to transit-oriented development-neighborhood plan-historic landmark (TOD-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture, community value, and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: November 1, 2023—initiate historic zoning (10-0). December 13, 2023—postpone to January 10, 2024 (9-0). January 10, 2024—postpone to February 7, 2024 (10-0). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Capital Metro, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, El Concilio Mexican- American Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association, Guadalupe Association for an Improved Neighborhood, Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods, Plaza Saltillo TOD Staff Liaison, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the store building as eligible for designation as a local landmark and individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It does not recommend the house for designation. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The Green & White grocery is an intact example of a neighborhood grocery store, a rapidly disappearing property type in Austin. Its vernacular construction, eye-catching sign, and distinctive clipped gable are iconic symbols of East Austin commerce. As is typical for small businesses …
Permitting and Development Center | 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, TX 78752 | (512) 978-4000 Property Profile Report General Information Location: Parcel ID: Grid: 1201 E 7TH ST 0205070101 MJ22 Planning & Zoning *Right click hyperlinks to open in a new window. Future Land Use (FLUM): Specific Regulating District Regulating Plan: Plaza Saltillo TOD Zoning: TOD-NP Zoning Cases: C14-01-0148 C14-01-0148.004 C14-2008-0029 NPA-2007-0009.01 NPA-2008-0009.01 011213-42 19990225-070b 20081211-082 20081211-084 Zoning Ordinances: Zoning Overlays: Neighborhood Plan: Infill Options: Neighborhood Restricted Parking Areas: -- Mobile Food Vendors: Historic Landmark: -- -- Urban Roadways: Yes No No No No No No Environmental Fully Developed Floodplain: FEMA Floodplain: Austin Watershed Regulation Areas: URBAN Watershed Boundaries: Waller Creek Creek Buffers: Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone: Edwards Aquifer Recharge Verification Zone: Erosion Hazard Zone Review Buffer: Political Boundaries Jurisdiction: AUSTIN FULL PURPOSE Council District: 3 County: TRAVIS School District: Austin ISD Community Registry: ADU Approximate Area Reduced Parking Residential Design Standards: LDC/25-2-Subchapter F Transit Oriented Development: PLAZA SALTILLO Selected Sign Ordinances CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN: SUB-DISTRICT 1 Mixed Use Building Infill Option, Urban Home Infill Option, Secondary Apartment Infill Option, Small Lot Amnesty Infill Option Zoning Guide The Guide to Zoning provides a quick explanation of the above Zoning codes, however, the Land Development Information Services provides general zoning assistance and can advise you on the type of development allowed on a property. Visit Zoning for the description of each Base Zoning District. For official verification of the zoning of a property, please order a Zoning Verification Letter. General information on the Neighborhood Planning Areas is available from Neighborhood Planning. Imagery Map Zoning Map Vicinity Map Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Capital Metro, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, El Concilio Mexican-American Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association , Guadalupe Association for an Improved Neighborhood, Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods , Plaza Saltillo TOD Staff Liaison, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town The Information on this report has been produced by the City of Austin as a working document and is not warranted for any other use. No warranty is made by the City regarding its accuracy or completeness. Date created: 11/2/2023 Amber Allen Historic Preservation Office City of Austin October 17, 2023 RE: Green and White Grocery (1201 …
Historical Zoning Application: Green and White Grocery, 1201 E. 7th St. Applicant: John Lopez Cazares Date:1/31/24 Project Name: Green and White Grocery Project Street Address: 1201 E. 7th St. Existing Zoning: TOD-NP Area to be Rezoned: .1495 Acres Proposed Zoning: TOD-H-NP Qualifications for Landmark Designation: Architecture, Historical Association, & Community Value Owner information: John Lopez Cazares 1201 E. 7th Street Austin, Texas 78702 (512) 472-0675 Application Prepared by: Matthew Medina (Preservation Austin) & JuanRaymon Rubio (City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission) ___________________________________________________________________________ Qualifications for Landmark Designation 1201 E. 7th St. meets the qualifications for Local Historic Landmark designation based on the following criteria: Architecture, Historical associations, and Community Value. Architecture Green and White Grocery is a one-story wood frame building sited on the northwest corner of the block. The store is approximately 44’ by 74’, and has its main facade along E. 7th St. The store has had multiple additions since its initial construction in 1938. Sanborn maps, historic photos, and oral histories have helped determine the building’s growth over time, although some additions and modifications appear to have happened without documentation. The store was originally half the size and depth and likely received a rear addition in 1944 and a store enlargement in 1950.1 Subsequent additions to the end of the building after 1965 resulted in its current state. Today, the store is defined by its Craftsman style characteristics including decorative wood brackets and exposed rafter rails beneath the primary roof structure and the first-story awning, and a large clipped gable roof, also known as a jerkinhead roof. The building features composite siding at the exterior walls, asphalt composition shingles, and aluminum doors and windows. The main facade has a classic “Green & White Groc.” sign painted green with custom tube lighting letters. The west elevation has no windows, and the east elevation has a few hopper 1 Norverto, Lopez. “Building Permit.” 44660, Austin, Texas, 1950, Austin History Center. Historical Zoning Application: Green and White Grocery, 1201 E. 7th St. clerestory windows. A portion of the west elevation is defined by a rubble stone wall that extends along Waller St. towards the detached residence. The stone wall has entrance steps to the house and backyard. It appears in historic photos from the 1940s. The rear elevation has a protruding dormer at the southeast corner with a private store entrance. Changes to the building since the 1960s include removal of …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS 2024 HERITAGE GRANT PROJECTS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2023-160038, HR-2023-160051 5-6 – 1 PROPERTY INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK/APPLICANT ADDITIONAL ARC RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSALS Kreisle Building 412 Congress Avenue Paggi Carriage Shop 421 E. 6th Street Rehab elevator, replace roof deck to install waterproofing and awning to repair/protect trusses beneath, repair gutters, repaint and reseal painted exterior surfaces, and reconstruct fire exit walkway. Applicant: Caitlyn Schwab Remove and repair/replace deteriorated roof elements, weatherproofing and installing new TPO roof. Applicant: Caitlyn Schwab None None STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Certificates of Appropriateness for all Heritage Grant projects. LOCATION MAPS 5-6 – 2 5-6 – 3
7 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2024-004371 GIESE-STARK STORE 1211 SAN BERNARD STREET PROPOSAL Repair store building, replace doors and windows, and add porch at rear. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair/restore/replace existing awning structure at west and north elevations as needed, including columns, in-kind. 2) Repair and repaint siding throughout the store building. 3) Replace missing windows at the west elevation with pairs of double-hung clad wood windows, including wire 4) Reconfigure and replace non-historic doors and windows at east, south, and north elevations with more appropriate glass/antique wire. Maintain existing openings. styles. Patch with salvaged siding where needed. 5) Replace the existing entry door with painted wood double doors, maintaining door opening and transom at the west elevation. Replace non-historic doors at the north elevation with partially glazed wood doors, maintaining door openings and transoms. 6) Add a concrete porch at the rear. 7) Extend the missing parapet cap around the perimeter per c. 2000 photograph. 8) Replace siding with stucco at the upper-floor addition. Add an awning and skylights. ARCHITECTURE One-story frame store building with covered porch, transom windows and doors, and a ca. 2010 upper-floor addition. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes minimal historic fabric, replacing missing elements or non-historic features. 3. Roofs The proposed parapet replacement is based on photographic evidence. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed patching and repair are appropriate. 5. Windows, doors, and screens Window and door repair and reinstallation are largely appropriate, with opening changes taking place at non-historic portions of secondary façades. The proposed designs for windows are appropriate. 6. Porches The proposed awning repair appears appropriate, and the rear porch will be added to an already altered secondary façade. 11. Commercial storefronts The proposed project rehabilitates the existing store façade and replaces fenestration within original openings. Summary The project mostly meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Use photos to corroborate changes where needed. Ensure that the awning is minimally visible from street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 7 – 2
Proposed Work Location of Proposed Work Proposed Materials West elevation and west end of north elevation (San Bernard and E 13th Street) Painted wood 1 Repair/restore/replace existing awning structure as needed, including columns, per structural engineer to provide a safe, stable structure. Maintain appearance of current structure insofar as structurally feasible. 2 Repair and paint existing wood siding. 3 4 5 Infill existing window openings, pairs of period- appropriate double-hung windows, to include wire glass/antique wire glass; sizes to remain. Infill existing door opening with new period- appropriate panel doors. Transoms as well as opening size to remain. Infill two existing door openings with new period- appropriate panel doors, to include antique wire. Transoms as well as opening sizes to remain. All elevations of Giese-Stark store portion of structure Maintain existing wood siding. Any siding removed from new openings to patch abandoned openings. West elevation (San Bernard) Clad wood windows, wire-glass glazing. West elevation (San Bernard) Painted wood double doors. Maintain existing transom. North elevation (E 13th Street) Painted fixed wood doors, glazed upper panels. Maintain existing transoms. 6 Remove two individual circa-2011 double-hung windows with a ganged pair of period-appropriate double-hung windows. North elevation, east end (E 13th Street) Clad wood windows. Any siding removed from new openings to be used to patch c.2011 openings. 7 Add new covered concrete porch. East elevation (facing back yard) Concrete porch, steel columns, hipped metal roof with similar pitch as historic west awning. 8 Replace/reconfigure circa-2011 window and door rough opening with new glazed double doors, transom above, flanked with period-appropriate double-hung windows. East elevation (facing back yard) Painted wood panel doors, glazed upper panels. Clad wood windows. Any siding removed from new openings to be used to patch c.2011 openings. 9 Replace/relocate circa-2011 window with new period-appropriate double-hung window. South elevation (facing back yard) 10 New period-appropriate double-hung window. South elevation (facing cottage front yard) 11 Extend existing north parapet cap around entire parapet perimeter per c.2000 photo All four elevations of parapet wall Clad wood window. Any siding removed from new opening to be used to patch c.2011 opening. Clad wood window. Any siding removed from new opening to be used to patch c.2011 opening(s). Metal roofing, painted wood trim. 12 Stucco replacing existing wood siding of circa-2011 upper floor addition. Recessed existing c.2011 upper addition. 3-coat stucco system. 13 Add lightweight awning. Lightweight metal frame and roofing. 14 Two …
8 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 C14H- 1980-0011; HR-2023-148863; GF-2023-149149 HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE 1209 ROSEWOOD AVENUE PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install landscape elements, fencing, and pavement to a landmarked site also individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 1) Remodel ADA pathways and install hardscape at the north entry, north-to-south connection, east-to-west connection, and west-facing patio. Proposed materials include Austin Common brick or equivalent to match the existing house. 2) Install brick walls, retaining walls, and seat walls at new patios. 3) Install a built-in canopy at the southwest of the property. Materials include Austin Common brick or equivalent to match the existing house and kebony. 4) Install a vine screen fence at the property perimeter, retaining existing fencing as well. 5) Planting improvements throughout the site, including native planting areas and shade trees. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 6. Porches The proposed project appears to rebuild the existing front steps and remove railings reconstructed around 2017. Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping The proposed landscaping eliminates most of the grass lawn in favor of plantings. It appears to grade the site to allow additional pavement for seating. 2. Walls and fences The proposed low vine screen is an appropriate complement to the existing wire fencing. The low brick walls and fences are appropriate in scale and materials. 3. Mechanical equipment and site appurtenances The built-in canopy structure at the rear of the house is a simpler replacement for an existing temporary structure. 4. Accessibility Proposed brick pathways appear appropriate for the site and compatible with the building. Summary The proposed project meets most of the standards. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION Choose plantings, furniture, and screening that enhance transparency so that the house is visible. Approve the application. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback. LOCATION MAP 8 – 2
Legend Legend 1 9 4 0 a e r i a l 1 9 5 8 a e r i a l Legend Notes 0 1/4/2024 300 600 ft 0 1/4/2024 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 300 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1 9 6 5 a e r i a l 1 9 7 6 a e r i a l Notes 0 1/4/2024 300 600 ft 0 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for 300 the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1/4/2024 completeness. Legend Notes Notes CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024Property ProfileProperty ProfileProperty ProfileProperty Profile CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2024-005072 RISHER-ROACH BUILDING, PART A 509 EAST 6TH STREET 9 – 1 PROPOSAL Rehabilitate the building and replace the storefront. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair and repaint the existing brick façade. 2) Replace the storefront within the existing openings. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Single-story brick structure with two arched windows and simple brick cornice detailing. The building has been painted. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project does not remove historic fabric from the building and repairs damaged masonry. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs damaged masonry and paints only previously painted brick. 11. Commercial storefronts The proposed storefront replaces only non-original material and appears appropriate in design and configuration. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Explore paint removal options if possible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 9 – 2
SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT REVITALIZATION 509 E 6TH STREET V I E W F R O M 5 0 0 B L O C K E A S T 6 T H S T R E E T L O O K I N G W E S T A U S T I N H I S T O R Y C E N T E R , c . 1 9 3 7 , A U S T I N , T E X A S H L C R E V I E W | 5 0 9 E 6 T H S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | F E B 0 7 , 2 0 2 4 509 E 6th Street 500 BLOCK PROPERTY SUMMARY: ADDRESS: DATE BUILT: 509 E 6TH STREET 1870 HISTORIC DESIGNATION: CoA HISTORIC LANDMARK Risher-Roach 1975 NHRP SURVEY: CONTRIBUTING SIXTH STREET SNAPSHOP RE-SURVEY, 2022: CONTRIBUTING CURRENT USE: VACANT . T S S E H C E N E 6TH ST. . T S R E V I R D E R SITE PLAN CURRENT PHOTOGRAPH (2022) S S E R G N O C S O Z A R B O T N I C A J N A S Y T I N I R T E 6 T H S E H C E N R E V I R D E R E N I B A S 5 3 - I SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND P R O P E R T Y O V E R V I E W H L C R E V I E W | 5 0 9 E 6 T H S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | F E B 0 7 , 2 0 2 4 NORTH ELEVATION: EXISTING 2023 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION B U I L D I N G C O M P A R I S O N O V E R T I M E H L C R E V I E …
Client: Address: OBSERVATION REPORT Bill McKean 2802 Pearce Road, Austin, TX February 1, 2024 On 26 January 2024, George Breehl, Inspection Supervisor, observed the home at the above address to identify health or safety concerns and/or deviation from adopted codes and standards governing existing buildings which have resulted in reported leaks and structural damage in the home. A. Report Limitations Please note, this report is based on the visual examination of the structural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing. No intrusive examinations have been performed, and no samples of materials have been taken for laboratory testing. No mold or air quality testing was conducted. No water quality testing was conducted. The observations, opinions, and recommendations are based entirely upon our visual examination, compiled data, and interviews with the tenants/owners as applicable. No detailed structural analysis of existing members has been performed, and no rehabilitation designs are provided in this report. ATS Engineers makes no warranties or guarantees, either expressed or implied, that all items of a deficient nature and/or improper construction techniques, etc. have been discovered and commented upon in this report. This report has been prepared to identify current deficiencies observed on the date of inspection and should not be considered an exhaustive description of every item that may require remedial attention. In some cases, additional examinations may be warranted to fully evaluate the deficiencies noted. Portions of the items inspected were covered, inaccessible or unavailable, therefore, unable to be thoroughly inspected. B. General Description of the Home and Accessory Building The home is a one-story, wood-framed structure, which measures approximately 28 feet across the front and 54 feet along the sides. The exterior consists of natural stone bearing walls with some wood siding. The roof is covered with composition shingles (not original roofing material). Per Travis CAD records, the home was constructed ca. 1910. An accessory building measuring approximately 15 feet by 12 feet was noted at the rear left corner of the property. Like the main home, the building is covered with stacked natural stone, wood siding and composition roof shingles. Based on discussions with the Owner, we understand this property has not been occupied in 53 years. C. General Observations C01. Exterior: The front gable of the house is warped. There is a downward and inward curve of the gable framing. The wood columns at the front porch are leaning inward following the curvature of the gable. The …
55.20'1 -t 1- UVtKHtALJ llEC./TELE. LINE -EB- IR()N FFNr'F LI\JE NO.I BEARIN:: & DISTANCE I _LEGEND I.'.~TUAL S 56'0C -37" W 55.22' Ll L2 L3 lf'~CORJ s 56'03 00" w L~.::TUAL N oo·5:t17" E f'O:CORJ N 01'02'-JO" E ~.::TUAL N 25'51'41" E f;:CCORD N 26 '03'00" E 30.27' 30.24' 51.33' 51.26' - IRF e IPF0 IRFCe :c 4.8' J pp 7 - -ET N 42"53'30" N 42'56'00" E E )( ~ - "'-.:t f.D (])_ Oro N~ \ f - -51 1 1 1--<Xl c_.')..--- w_ S:CJ o_ < ~ ~~ ~ T2+ z <(y' 2m -503..00-------- ~-;:.J.OO I .~o'O-ao I I I I ' I r, I ' ROCK WALL (TYP.) 520 + :a -.;t s· , ~/', :a:o:-:-- - ,---~~-· "" -- - - -- ..- --, /" 1/r- I I ~-, 5' P.U.E. PER PLAT ·.r: :o.. -')- 1- xn wn z~ z_ <(Cl o_ <(_ ZLO <(1"- z <(' ::;;i:6 ' ' "' •" ;," - -7~o· uJ .'1- ..... :.i·: \ .\)<~~ ""~cf>\ :>> ··:.-:). cL ... BN USED: USED LAKE AUSTIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION, FURNISHED BY LCRA, AS BENCH MARK. £LEV 492.20' (APRIL 20, 2027) BW: "/" SET ON ':ONCRET£ DRAIN±_ 77.5 FT. FROM THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER £LEV 495 30' BU2: 5.9 1NDL£ SET IN TREE (TAG NO. 57 7). £LEV 497.28' PPOPEF..TY SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND EASEMENT RIGHTS RECORDED IN VOL. 43, PC. 79, PLAT RECORDS AND VOL. 3507, PG. 7 3.88, DEED RECORDS. E.:.SEMLNT RECORCED IN VOL. 2375, PC. 223, DEED RECORDS, DOES NOT APPEAR TO TRAVERSE THE PROPERTY. PAGE 1 OF 2 RO'-N) S·~rvey No. 21105-8 Sad lot is in Zone ___){____ as identified by the Fderal E-nergency Management Agency on Commur ty Panel No4-,.::8:::..&..,::::.5.:::3~C::_:0:::_:.4.:::3~0::.:,K.:_ ______ _ Dated: ~'AN. 22, 2020 LOT NO. I BLOCK NO . - - - - - PLAT OF SURVEY SCALE: 1" 30' GF 202003744 All corners are 1/2-inch iron rod found unless otherwise noted. To the lien holders and/or the owners of the premises surveyed. crTYAUSTIN A=IJITION oR SUBDIVISWN LEIGH ADDITION, VOLUME 43, PAGE 79, PLAT RECORDS s-:-REET ADDREss2802 PEARCE ROAD suRvEY fOR HERITAGE TITLE COMPANY OF AUSTIN, To: ALU-4NT NA T!Of'-.'AL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, S?~TE OF TEXAS, COUNTY C:Ji' TRAVIS I l-!EREBv CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE SURVEY WAS MADE THIS DAY ON THE GROUND AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THAT TKERE A:;E NO DISCREPANCES, CONFLICTS, SHORTAGES IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY …
FRONT PORCH – ROOF & FRAMING “There is a downward and inward curve of the gable framing. The wood columns at the front porch are leaning inward following the curvature of the gable. The columns appear to be undersized. It was noted that the beam supporting the left side of the porch canopy is rotting with portions missing. The roofing at the front left side of the porch is rotted and falling.” STONEWORK “Large cracks were noted in the wall along the perimeter of the front porch. It was noted that some cracks were more than 1” wide; for reference cracks greater than 1/8” typically require structural repair. It appears that these wider cracks are partial recurrences of larger cracks (up to 3”) that were previously repaired.” FOUNDATION “The right side of the house appears to be a clear path for rain runoff… Part of the foundation along the right side and at the front of the entry porch has been undermined by the erosion… It was noted that the backyard drains towards the back of the house… It appears that the result of this is water migration into these areas of the house… The visible portions of the foundation framing of the house have completely deteriorated.” ROOF “Several holes were noted in the roof. This resulted in wet areas in the house and the rotting of some site-built roof trusses, window headers, and other lumber in the house. It appears that several trusses have been repaired previously… The construction of the roof trusses and the subsequent repairs appear to fall significantly short of acceptable engineering practices. It appears that the roofs of both buildings have begun to collapse.” INTERIOR “In general, the house is open to the elements… The house has an extraordinarily strong smell of mildew… It was also noted that some electrical splices were unprotected…. It was noted that the subfloor of the kitchen and the bathroom, including floor joists and beams, has almost completely rotted away. It was noted that the floor or the bathroom is filled with mildew. It was also noted that the walls were partially covered in mildew… The moisture and smell of the house poses a risk to the health and safety to persons on the property.” CONCLUSIONS “These buildings are dilapidated and unfit for habitation… Based on the number of structural deficiencies noted in the roofs of the main house and …
NEAREST CONTIGUOUS 40 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND A P P X. 5 8 2.7 2' PROJECT LOCATION A FULL RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2019 NFPA 13D OR THE 2021 IRC P2904 STANDARDS WILL BE INSTALLED IN THIS PROPERTY. THE PLANS FOR THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM MUST DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY A TEXAS LICENSED SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR FOR NFPA 13D SYSTEMS OR A TEXAS LICENSED PLUMBER WITH THE MULTIPURPOSE RESIDENTIAL FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SPECIALIST (MRFPSS) ENDORSEMENT. THE SPRINKLER PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, APPROVED, TESTED AND INSPECTED BY AFD PRIOR TO COVERING THE WALLS AND CEILINGS. A FLOW TEST OF THE MOST DEMANDING AREA WILL BE REQUIRED. LOT INFORMATION MAXIMUM ALLOWED BUILDING COVERAGE @ 40% = 17,703.74 SF MAXIMUM ALLOWED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE @ 45% = 19,916.71 SF CITY of AUSTIN AREA CALCULATIONS CoA AREA NAME a) 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA e) COVERED PARKING f) COV'D PATIO, DECK, PORCH, AND/OR BALCONY g) OTHER COVERED OR ROOFED AREA h) UNCOVERED WOOD DECK TOTAL BUILDING AREA EXISTING 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF IMPERVIOUS COVER CALCULATIONS TOTAL LOT AREA: 44,259.36 SF AREA NAME a) 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA e) COVERED PARKING f) COV'D PATIO, DECK, PORCH, AND/OR BALCONY g) OTHER COVERED OR ROOFED AREA EXISTING 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE (ONLY GROUND FLOOR AREAS INCLUDED FOR TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE) 0.00 SF CONC. DRIVE CONC. WALK EQUIP. PAD OTHER FLATWORK OUTDOOR STAIRS RETAINING WALL UNCOV'D WOOD DECK 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF NEW 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 37.88 SF 6,206.54 SF NEW 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 2,070.71 SF 134.15 SF 26.23 SF 20.54 SF 57.34 SF 175.19 SF 18.94 SF 8,671.76 SF TOTAL 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 37.88 SF 6,206.54 SF TOTAL 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 2,070.71 SF 134.15 SF 26.23 SF 20.54 SF 57.34 SF 175.19 SF 18.94 SF 8,671.76 SF 6,168.66 SF 6,168.66 SF A WILDLAND LOCATION 12" = 1'-0" TOTAL IMPERVIOUS (UNCOV'D WOOD DECK COUNTED @ 50% FOR TOTAL IMPERVIOUS) TOTAL PROJECT BUILDING COVERAGE @ 6,168.66 SF = 13.94% TOTAL PROJECT IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE @ 8,671.76 SF = 19.59% THIS PROJECT WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE CLASS …
2802 PEARCE RD SITE RESTRICTIONS DIAGRAM NO DEVELOPMENT PER: - SETBACKS FRONT: 40’ SIDE: 10’ REAR: 20’ - LAKE AUSTIN ZONING (GREATER - LAKE AUSTIN ZONING (GREATER THAN 35% SLOPE) - TREE PROTECTION (1/2 CRZ OF PROTECTED & HERITAGE TREES) LIMITED DEVELOPMENT PER: - LAKE AUSTIN ZONING (15-25% SLOPE) - TREE PROTECTION (FULL CRZ OF PROTECTED & HERITAGE TREES) EXISTING STRUCTURES - SEE ATS ENGINEERING OBSERVATION REPORT - SEE PHOTOS DEVELOPMENT AREA: - MAX 50% IMPACT TO ANY PROTECTED OR HERITAGE TREE - ADA ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED FOR OWNER (SEE FULL SURVEY BY SNS ENGINEERING FOR SURVEY LEGEND) LEGEND
