15TH STREET . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N S H O A L C R E E K B L V D . W 15TH STREET W 13TH STREET E V T A S E W W 15TH STREET E V T A S E W W 14TH STREET W 13TH HALF STREET N SITE PLAN APPROVAL SP-2023-XXXXC CASE NUMBER ________________ APPLICATION DATE:____________ APPROVED ON ____________ ADMINISTRATIVELY BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 112 142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE (LDC 25-5-81) ____________ CASE MANAGER __________ 03/28/2024 _______________________________________ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT RELEASED FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE __________ ZONING ______________ SF-3, P 21 SHEET ____ OF ____ BM-104 CHISELED SQURE IN CURB ELEVATION = 476.61' 15TH STREET . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N S H O A L C R E E K B L V D . BM-103 CHISELED SQURE IN CURB ELEVATION = 471.91' W 15TH STREET W 15TH STREET W 13TH STREET W 13TH STREET E E V V T A T A S S E E W W W 15TH STREET W 15TH STREET E E V V T A T A S S E E W W W 14TH STREET W 14TH STREET W 13TH HALF STREET W 13TH HALF STREET N SITE PLAN APPROVAL SP-2023-XXXXC CASE NUMBER ________________ APPLICATION DATE:____________ APPROVED ON ____________ ADMINISTRATIVELY BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 112 142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE (LDC 25-5-81) ____________ CASE MANAGER __________ 03/28/2024 _______________________________________ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT RELEASED FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE __________ ZONING ______________ SF-3, P 21 SHEET ____ OF ____ . D V L B R A M A L H T R O N S H O A L C R E E K B L V D . BM-103 CHISELED SQURE IN CURB ELEVATION = 471.91' NOTE: UNDERGROUND MAINS SUPPLYING NFPA 14 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13, AND THE FIRE CODE, BY A LICENSED SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR WITH A PLUMBING PERMIT. THE ENTIRE MAIN MUST BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT ONE TIME, UNLESS ISOLATION VALVES ARE PROVIDED BETWEEN TESTED SECTIONS N SITE PLAN APPROVAL SP-2023-XXXXC CASE NUMBER ________________ APPLICATION DATE:____________ APPROVED ON ____________ ADMINISTRATIVELY BY COMMISSION UNDER SECTION 112 142 OF CHAPTER 25-5 OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODE EXPIRATION DATE …
. 3 7 5 1 7 8 4 3 1 7 . : f 3 8 5 1 . 7 8 4 . 3 1 7 : p 2 0 0 7 7 s a x e T , n o t s u o H , 0 0 3 1 e t i u S , m a l i M 0 0 7 . 3 5 4 6 4 2 2 0 1 2 . : f 2 3 0 6 . 4 2 2 . 0 1 2 : p 9 0 2 8 7 s a x e T , i o n o t n A n a S , 0 0 3 e t i u S , y a w d a o r B 0 4 0 4 . 1 4 4 7 8 7 4 2 1 5 . : f 6 8 2 7 . 8 7 4 . 2 1 5 : p 4 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A , 0 0 9 e t i u S , d a o R s g n i r p S n o t r a B 1 1 8 n i t s u A n o t s u o H i o n o t n A n a S S T N E M E V O R P M I I M U D A T S K R A P E S U O H , 1 0 7 8 7 , X T , N I T S U A , D V L B K E E R C L A O H S 1 0 3 1 K P E S H 4 3 0 0 - 1 2 . D . S . I N I T S U A S1 1" (CL OF BEAM) 21' - 10" 1 EOD = 7" 2 3 3.2 4 5 6 7 20' - 1" 17' - 9 1/2" 19' - 11" 12' - 8" 9' - 1" EOD = 7" 82' - 8 1/2" 2' - 0" S2 1" (CL OF BEAM) 9' - 4 7/8" S3 R) E G RIN T F S L O " (C 1 SA SA.1 SB " 4 " 4' - 3 SC " 1 …
1/2" TYP. SUPPORTING MEMBER . I N M " 2 / 1 E P O C O T 2" 3 1/2" MIN. 1/4 STEEL BEAM - SEE PLAN BEAM "N" "L" (INCHES) WELD SIZE PLATE THICKNESS " 2 / 1 1 " 2 / 1 1 S T L O B " N " S W O R . . C O " 3 @ " L " " 2 / 1 1 VIEW A-A 3/8" SHEAR PLATE W/ 3/4" Ø A325N THRU BOLTS WITH STD. HOLES - SEE NOTE 6 MINIMUM REQUIRED BOLT ROW SCHEDULE W8 - W10 W12 - W14 W16 - W18 W24 - W27 W21 W30 W30 - W36 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6" 9" 12" 15" 18" 21" 24" 3/8" 3/8" 3/8" 3/8" 5/16" 5/16" 5/16" CAPACITY (LRFD) 24.8 KIPS 43.4 KIPS 62.5 KIPS 81.3 KIPS 89.1 KIPS 108 KIPS 127 KIPS 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" 1/4" NOTES: 1. THIS CONNECTION DETAIL IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST THE DETAILER WHERE THIS CONNECTION DETAIL IS USED. NO CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW, PROVIDED THAT ALL ASPECTS OF THE CONNECTIONS CONFORM TO THIS DETAIL. 2. ALL CONNECTIONS IN THE DRAWINGS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED BY THIS CONNECTION DETAIL MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE DETAILER. SIGNED AND SEALED DESIGN CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER FOR SUCH CONNECTION CONDITIONS. 3. AT THE DETAILER'S OPTION, ALTERNATE CONNECTION DETAILS MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT. ALTERNATE CONNECTION DETAILS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY DESIGN CALCULATIONS THAT ARE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER. 4. THE TABULATED CAPACITIES ARE FACTORED LOADS (LRFD) 5. THE TABULATED CAPACITIES ARE BASED ON GRADE 50 BEAMS, A36 PLATES AND ANGLES, A325N BOLTS, AND E70XX ELECTRODES. 6. HORIZONTALLY SHORT SLOTTED HOLES MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF STANDARD HOLES EXCEPT FOR BEAMS WITHIN BRACED FRAMES, AT MOMENT CONNECTIONS, OR WITH HORIZONTAL FORCES NOTED ON PLAN. WF BEAM - SEE PLAN HSS COLUMN - SEE PLAN W/ 3/8" CAP PLATE WF BEAM COPED AS NECESSARY- SEE PLAN SEE TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION DETAIL WF BEAM - SEE PLAN SEE TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION DETAIL 1 TYPICAL SINGLE SHEAR PLATE CONNECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" TYPICAL WIDE FLANGE BEAM TO WIDE FLANGE BEAM SHEAR CONNECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 TYPICAL BEAM TO HSS COLUMN CONNECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 TYPICAL BEAM TO BEAM …
TYP ACCESSIBLE SINGLE OCCUPANT TOILET ROOM CONFIGURATIONS TOILET TYPES TOILET ACCESSORY LEGEND TA-1 GRAB BAR TA-7 SOAP DISPENSER- WALL MOUNT TA-8 FRAMED MIRROR TA-12 SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL - WALL MOUNT TA-14 ROBE HOOK TA-15 UTILITY SHELF TA-17 SURFACE-MOUNTED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER TA-25 TOILET TISSUE DISPENSER - TWIN JUMBO ROLL C.F.C.I. O.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. C.F.C.I. O.F.C.I. O.F.C.I. 2'-3" 5'-0" 5'-0" " 0 - ' 5 TA-14 <T1> 4'-0" " 5 - ' 1 17" " 7 - ' 4 " 6 - ' 7 R A E L C N M I " 5 - ' 1 " 7 - ' 4 " 6 - ' 7 R A E L C N M I " 0 - ' 3 " 6 FLOOR PLAN DESIGNATIONS <WS1> 8'-0" MIN CLEAR DOOR SWING IN FRONT OF LAVATORY <TR1> I N M " 5 1 " 5 X A M 4'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 4'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-3" 1'-3" " 0 - ' 2 X A M " 7 - ' 1 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE STANDING LOCATION STANDING LOCATION " 6 - ' 1 A L C O V E 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE PLACE WATER FOUNTAIN FIXTURES IN AN ALCOVE TO PROVIDE FOR CANE DETECTION OR PROVIDE A CANE DETECTION SKIRT PLAN ACCESSIBLE RECESSED WATER FOUNTAIN <EWC1> <EWC3> PLAN ACCESSIBLE WALL MOUNTED WATER FOUNTAIN <EWC2> <EWC4> Has Bottle Filler <WS1> LAVATORY AND SINK NOTE: LAVATORY AND SINK ACCESSORIES MOUNTED TO WALL PERPENDICULAR TO PLUMBING WALL SHALL NOT EXTEND PAST LEADING EDGE OF SINK OR MORE THAN 4" INTO THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE. 6'-10" MIN CLEAR IN SINGLE OCCUPANT TOILET ROOMS, THE DOOR SWING IS ALLOWED TO OVERLAP ALL CLEARANCES IF A 30X48 CLEAR AREA IS PROVIDED OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR SWING - TDLR TAS 603.2.3 EXCEPTION 2 3" MIN 1'-3" 1'-3" 1'-2" " 5 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 4 " 5 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 4 " 4 / 1 6 - ' 1 TA-8 TA-7 TA-17 " 4 / 1 6 - ' 1 TA-7 TA-8 TA-17 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE ACCESSIBLE LAVATORY WITH ADJACENT WALL ACCESSIBLE LAVATORY 40" MAX. FOR MIRRORS INSTALLED ABOVE LAVATORIES OR COUNTERTOPS. 35" MAX. FOR MIRRORS NOT INSTALLED ABOVE LAVATORIES OR COUNTERTOPS. 1'-4" TA-15 TA-15 " 4 - ' 2 " 4 - ' 1 1'-0" 2'-4" " …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 2, 2025 PR-2025-025231; GF-2025-027260 6004 SPANCREEK CIRCLE X – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1961 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 6004 Spancreek Circle is a one-story residence constructed with Mid-century Modern and Ranch stylistic influences. It is clad in board-and-batten siding and is capped with a low-slope roof with an irregular roofline and deep eaves supported by exposed rafter tails. An original attached carport has been enclosed, though its flat-roofed form remains the same, and though some original windows appear to have been replaced by incompatible vinyl units, the openings appear unaltered. The house at 6004 Spancreek Circle was constructed in 1961 by builder Lloyd McLean for the 1961 Parade of Homes. In her National Register nomination for another Northwest Hills model home, Karen Twer discusses the importance of the Parade of Homes in Austin’s development history: By building model houses for events like the Parade of Homes, builders and developers could highlight the attractive and livable qualities of their volume-built houses and market new suburban developments to masses of potential homebuyers. As a kind of conceptual show window, their model houses needed to be centrally located…Not bounded by the existing urban landscape, developers could create the kind of neighborhoods second-time middle-class homebuyers were seeking. By hosting Parade of Homes events in outlying areas of growing cities, developers and builders were influential in shaping the suburban development of expanding cities like Austin. […] Builders and developers relied on architects to design the kind of distinctive houses that would rival custom-built houses…Model houses built for the Parade of Homes were collaborative interpretations of the kind of modern domestic lifestyle homebuyers dreamt of…In the 1960s, [Austin’s] Parade of Homes events continued focusing on largely undeveloped areas south and northwest of the city. In 1961, it was in Highland Hills, a neighborhood nestled between what is today the Mopac Expressway and Northwest Hills…In addition to the spectacle the events provided Austinites, Austin builders and developers understood the mass-marketing opportunity the Parade of Homes offered.1 “Perched near the crest of a scenic Northwest hill, on a level, landscaped homesite…nothing quite like it has been seen in Austin before, because it is a practical product of fertile imagination and skilled homebuilding,” extols the Austin-American Statesman. “Every room at 6004 Spancreek Circle is a dream of tomorrow that’s here today.”2 Despite its glowing reputation, the home’s first occupants, Cynthia and …
Exhibit B.2: SITES THAT ARE DESIGNATED AS HISTORICALLY OR ARCHEOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES IN NEED OF TAX RELIEF TO ENCOURGE THEIR PRESERVATION RECEIVING THE PARTIAL EXEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAXES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 Parcel Number Landmark Name 0205020506 0206051208 Pearl House Bar Bailetti House Address 221 Congress Avenue 1006 Waller Street Zoning Case Number FY25 Inspection Result C14H-1986-0040 C14H-1988-0022 Pass Pass
5450 Bee Caves Rd. Ste. 4B Austin, TX 78746 To whom it may concern, Opinion- The structure/house located at 2307 Bridle Path has multiple poorly executed additions. There is visible evidence of foundation deficiencies along with visible evidence of termite infestation. The siding on the front of the house is not original and has been replaced with Hardie cement siding. There have been many changes to the original house that are not congruent with the original architecture. It would be cost prohibitive to save this structure in its current condition. Donald Berry Senior Project Manager David Wilkes Builders LLC DW Residential LLC 5450 Bee Caves Rd., Suite 4B Austin, Texas 78746 davidwilkesbuilders.com
Steering Committee Members: Steve Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum, Meghan Yancy March 28, 2025 RE: 705 West Lynn - PR-2024-159632; GF-2024-161879 Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, OWANA, supports retaining contributing structures in our historic district and integrating existing building forms into the overall project for new development. In the case of 705 West Lynn, preserving the façade and front rooms of the existing house and adding on to the structure would have a significant impact toward that goal. We support the HLC’s Architectural Review Committee’s recommended exploration in elevation and section of a second story at the rear of the front housing unit and exploring the possibility of widening the proposed rear parking structure to add desired interior floor area. The applicant has not meet with the OWANA with any updated elevations and sections and it is difficult to support demolition of a contributing structure without seeing more descriptive two dimensional drawings of how successful the massing would be with an addition to the original structure. Rehabilitation, remodel and addition to contributing structures in our historic district versus demolition maintains the vitality of the district. If piecemeal destruction of these historic homes continues, our district will cease to exist and its sense of historic narrative and charm will no longer be visible. This devalues our unique pocket of history in an increasingly dynamic city. Let’s continue to respect and appreciate the reason so many people want to live in our neighborhood. The United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Report “NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM” lists 705 West Lynn as a representative property to illustrate “the broad patterns of development, diverse range of resources, and salient features of the dominant types and styles present in the district. They have been selected on the basis of their geographic distribution, relationship to similar properties, and degree of integrity.” Listed as a contributing structure, 705 West Lynn is a Center-passage, Side Gable Classical Revival style, and individually eligible for National Register listing. Please consider our position in your decision process as we welcome new development while struggling to maintain the essence of our neighborhood. Sincerely, Steve Amos OWANA Chair
C20-2024-010 UNO Update Proposal Public Review Paul Books, Principal Planner Content Background Process Proposed Changes Next Steps Background Subdistrict Outer West Inner West Guadalupe Dobie Background UNO: A Brief History – Established in 2004 (Updated: 2014, 2019) – Overlay district for the West University area designed to promote high-density and pedestrian-oriented redevelopment that maintains the existing character of the area – Helped to facilitate population growth to over 28,000 residents in the West Campus area 4 City Council Resolution Resolution No. 20240418-077 – Adopted on April 18, 2024 – Includes 29 distinct items for further investigation – Initiated updates to the Land Development Code & Building Criteria Manual – Requested programmatic updates – Land Development Code changes to be considered in Spring 2025 5 Resolution Goals Provide quality, safe, affordable living for all, especially for students attending colleges and universities by: Supporting the implementation of light rail and mobility enhancements Ensuring the area provides daily needs and services Increasing housing capacity, quality, and affordability 6 Land Development Code Council Direction Height limits achievable with participation in the University Neighborhood Overlay (UNO) density bonus program in alignment with the Planning Commission's recommendation to remove height limits for Inner West Campus and Dobie Height limits that are similar to what can be achieved with participation in the ETOD overlay, at minimum Expansion of UNO boundaries Subdistrict boundaries that expand Inner West Campus An appropriate step down of heights within expansion areas Modifying development requirements to discourage above-ground parking and encourage shared parking and underground parking Stakeholder and community engagement 7 Process How it Works 3-Step Process for Code Amendments: Initiation Development & Engagement Review & Adoption 9 Rezoning Process To update the regulations, staff proposes to create a new zoning district that incorporates the existing overlay with requested updates Rezoning requires notice to impacted properties and review by the Planning Commission and City Council at public hearings 10 Plan Amendment Process UNO is part of the Central Austin Combined Neighborhood Plan, an element of the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Current Future Land Use Map 11 Plan Amendment Process Mixed use land use designation allows up to 3:1 floor-to-area ratio High density mixed use is appropriate for areas with 3:1 FAR or (FAR) greater Staff propose updating the Central Austin Combined Neighborhood Plan to ensure that the …
Perry Named Chairman Of Cystic Fibrosis Fund The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); A Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. u g 1 6 , 1 9 6 2 ; P r o Q u e s t H i s t o r i c a l N e w s p a p e r s : T h e A u s t i n A m e r i c a n S t a t e s m a n p g . B 1
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Case # PR 25-008236, Sam Fahnestock Tuesday, April 1, 2025 3:11:34 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Mr, Sam Fahnestock, I have been in this neighborhood for over 25 years and wish to vote in favor of demolition of property at 4901 Ridge Oak Dr, Austin, TX 78731. I recognize the property is Mid Century Architecture but feel the neighborhood will be better served redeveloped to current owners desire and design. Thank you for your consideration. -- Marty Richardson CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Comment for Hearing PR-25-008236 - 4901 Ridge Oak Drive, Austin Tuesday, April 1, 2025 11:18:05 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution As a neighbor of this property with a hearing tomorrow (Weds April 2nd), I want to voice support for the new owner to be able to demolish this property and move forward with building a new dwelling. I live three houses down from the property, and while I understand the mission of the preservation society, and for Austin, I feel this property does not qualify and the process should have been started before a seller purchased the property. This property has been in total disrepair since our neighbor Roy (a former UT chemistry professor) moved out several years ago. Nothing has been taken care of, and when the property was being sold, not one person in the neighborhood came forward to speak about it being covered as historical. From my perspective, while there are certainly houses that should be covered by preservation plans, this one does not seem to most neighbors like it should be in the same category as those. In speaking with neighbors surrounding the property, we are all in favor of the plans we've seen for the new dwelling by the new owners. They're planning in building a dwelling that will fit the neighborhood (unlike some of the ones we've seen go up) and it will be a great upgrade to that corner of our street. It also does not seem fair that someone purchases a property, moves forward with millions of dollars and then someone comes out of nowhere stopping the progress once they're ready to get underway. The house as it stands now has been an eyesore, and a place where people have gathered to drink, sit out back and generally not add value to our corner. I do hope my vote is registered on the " approve for removal" side of the vote log . I do not have the letter that some people were submitting, but I wanted to make sure to vote anyway. Appreciate the work your team does, and do look forward to many other houses that do have true historical value being preserved. Elizabeth Whitney Zoller-Hyde 4704 Crestway Drive - corner of Ridge Oak and Crestway Dr CAUTION: This is …
