DESIGN COMMISSION MONDAY, April 26, 2021 5:30 PM VIA REMOTE WebEx Meeting Minutes X X X X Vacant (District 6) Jessica Rollason (District 7) Aan Coleman (District 8) Bart Whatley (District 9) Ben Luckens (District 10) Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 5:34 p.m. Member List David Carroll – Chair (District 1) X X Melissa Hanao-Robledo – Vice-Chair (District 5) X Martha Gonzalez – (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) X Josue Meiners (District 4) X Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) X “X” Denote Commission Members who were in attendance X Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison X Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison X Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None. 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): CITY OF AUSTIN HOUSING AND PLANNING STAFF a. Courtesy Briefing of the City of Austin George Washington Carver Museum Expansion, to be presented by Terry Smith-Smith & Co. Architects; Gregory Montes-City of Austin Park and Recreation Department (PARD). • Gregory Montes and Terry Smith, Smith & Co. Architects presented and answered questions from the Commissioners. • No action was taken by Design Commission for this item. Page 1 of 3 2. COMMISSION-SPECIFIC BUSINESS (Discussion and possible action): a. Approval of March 22nd meeting minutes. • Commissioner E. Taniguchi made a motion to approve the March 22nd meeting minutes as presented. Commissioner J. Meiners seconded. • The motion was approved [10 ayes, 0 nays] b. Attendance Reports for the Commissioners • Aaron Jenkins briefed the commission that attendance reports were requested by the City Clerk’s office on a regular basis. Mr. Jenkins provided a courtesy reminder that Commissioners need to attend all meetings if possible; more than (3) unexcused consecutive absences will place the Commissioners in jeopardy of being removed from the Commission. Mr. Jenkins asked that staff be notified of any absence, so that the attendance report and be marked accordingly. c. Officer Elections: Chair & Vice Chair • Commissioner A. Coleman made a motion to approve David Carroll as Chair and Melissa Hanao-Robledo as Vice chair for the next election cycle. Commissioner S. Franco seconded. [Commissioner A. Coleman withdrew her motion.] • Commissioner A. Coleman made a motion to approve David Carroll as Chair and Jessica Rollason as Vice chair for the next term. Commissioner J. Meiners seconded. • The motion was approved [9 ayes, 0 nays] * Commissioner M. Gonzalez was unable to connect into the meeting, due to technical difficulties. …
Table of Contents The Downtown Substation Community Engagement Report documents outreach and community input for all phases of the community engagement process. This report will continue to be updated throughout the course of the project. Community Engagement Report Community Engagement Phases & Timeline ..................................................................................... 1 Phase 1: Outreach Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 Phase 2: Outreach Summary ................................................................................................................... 10 Phase 3: Outreach Summary ....................................................................................................................... Appendix A: Phase 1 Materials and Comments ................................................................ 19 Appendix B: Phase 2 Materials and Comments ............................................................... 41 Appendix C: Phase 3 Materials and Comments ................................................................... Prepared by CD&P – Updated November 2019 IREPOWERING DOWNTOWN Engagement DOWNTOWN SUBSTATION Community Austin Energy is committed individuals, community preferences design. that outlined goals of the engagement A Community Engagement Report to active and engaging effort: and opinions are heard and considered leaders. businesses. and organizations to ensure that their for inclusion in the substation communication with residents. Plan was developed for the Downtown Substation • Create public awareness about the substation and public engagement process through a deliberative outreach • Provide an open and transparent effort process throughout the entire planning process • Provide a variety of accessible opportuni ties and options for all those interested to conveniently • Engage a diverse set of participants • Provide engaging • Collect input on considerations interactions that facilitate collecting and certain aspects of design be involved and share input valuable input of tools will be used to reach these goals. including meetings A variety stakeholders. presence local business online such as an updated webpage and surveys. and civic at community events. holding public meetings, group outreach, and providing opportunities to participate with conducting COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PHASES & TIMELINE Community engagement phase will encompass stakeholders and members of the community in the process. the entire effort to share information. collect will occur throughout this process in three phases. Each input, and involve COMMUNITY COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: ENGAGEMENT: Collect community nputon concerns. desires. and preferences Share aesthetic design concepts for enclosure and work with the public to SUMMER them 2019 refine COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Present draft plan. collect feedback. incorporate into design and SUBSTATION ENERGIZATION ... SUMMER 2018 .. EARLY 2019 Preliminary engineering and design begins Begin construction to move water and wastewater line PHASE 1: OUTREACH The purpose of the first outreach phase was to introduce the project and process, continue to build awareness in the community, and collect input on concerns, desires, and preferences. To …
City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review Application The Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1. City projects (see page ii for process) The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 2. Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process) The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 3. Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process) The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/ Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6) Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile Site plan and landscape plan Ground level, basement …
Repowering Downtown $60M initiative to increase capacity, resiliency, and reliability to meet the needs of our growing city. • Increase Distribution Tie Circuits • Add 70 MVA to Seaholm Substation • Build New Downtown Substation • Rebuild Brackenridge Substation • Upgrade Network Distribution Feeder Circuits • Convert 69kV Transmission Lines to 138kV Downtown Network Substation Locations 806 ½ LAMBIE ST. 1 1 Downtown Substation Austin Energy operates 77 substations across 437 square miles of service area. The downtown substation is being designed as a gas-insulated switchgear substation, which is ideal for densely-populated urban locations. Gas-Insulated Switchgear (GIS) Compared to Air-Insulated Switchgear (AIS) Compact Design Significant footprint reduction (approximately 70% smaller) Capital Costs Approximately 2x more O&M Lower maintenance costs Aesthetics GIS portion in a building and station surrounded by enclosure Reliability GIS is less susceptible to faults Installation Equipment Faster site assembly with pre-assembly and testing completed at manufacturer Standard power transformers and enclosed medium voltage utilized to reduce cost and increase maintainability 2 2 The Site • Selected in 1999 for the future electric needs of downtown • Austin Energy is coordinating with other involved agencies, including: • TxDOT • Watershed Protection for storm drain • Total Site: 1.46 acres • Substation Footprint: 0.81 acres • Site Updates: • 3 transmission poles (currently 2) to allow clearance over heritage trees • Two driveways PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SUBJECT TO FINAL SITE APPROVAL 3 3 KEY MILESTONES PUBLIC MEETING #3 September 2020 Shared results of site name, preferred design concepts, materials, and construction plans WATER & WASTEWATER RELOCATION Fall 2019 - Spring 2020 Relocation of wastewater and electric lines from to within City of Austin ROW along East Avenue REZONING OF SITE LOCATION June 2020 FINALIZE DESIGN Spring 2021 90-100% completion of substation engineering and design 4 4 Community Engagement Summary Over 600 responses on preferences from the community WHAT WE HEARD PUBLIC MEETING #1: June 2018 • Purpose: Introduce project, build awareness, collect feedback on priorities • 178 surveys received PUBLIC MEETING #2: February 2019 • Purpose: Collect feedback on aesthetic and layout concepts • 440 surveys received PUBLIC MEETING #3: September 2020 • Purpose: Share preferred concepts, potential materials, site design, and process updates Priority for colorful and artistic features Desire to preserve trees and incorporate native landscaping Support for modern design for enclosure wall 5 5 PUBLIC MEETING #3 September 24, 2019 SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT • Shared …
Landscape 23-3D-3110 23-3D-3110 Functional Green (A) Description. (1) Functional Green Landscape is a two-tiered approach to fulfilling the purpose of the landscape code. The first tier requires landscape elements to be placed in specified areas of a site, thus protecting private and public investment, providing visual buffering, limiting overcrowding, and enhancing property values. The second tier is a scoring system that measures the ecosystem service value created by landscape; it is intended to improve ecological balance, replenish native vegetation, and enhance public health, safety, and welfare. (2) The Functional Green Score measures the total amount of ecosystem services provided by the landscape elements proposed for a development site. Landscape plans are required to reach a total target Functional Green Score based on the assigned value per square foot area of each landscape element in relation to the area of the site. (B) Applicability. (1) Functional Green Score applies to all sites that allow an impervious cover total exceeding 80 percent. (2) Functional Green Score may also apply to a site that is restricted to an impervious cover less than 80 percent and elects to use this approach to meet requirements of the landscape code. 3D-3 pg. 13 City of Austin | Proposed LDC Revision – January 31, 2020 23-3D-3110 Landscape (C) Requirements. (1) A Functional Green Landscape plan is required to: (a) Comply with all applicable landscape and buffer types (Sections 23-3D-3030 through 23-3D-3100); (b) Comply with Planting and Soil Standards in the ECM; (c) Reach the Functional Green Target Score (prescribed in the ECM); if the target score cannot be reached by providing the applicable landscape and buffer types, Functional Green Landscape Elements must be added in order to reach the Functional Green Target Score; (d) Be designed to accommodate the minimum space requirements for each landscape element proposed to meet the Functional Green Score. (e) Provide 100 percent of plant selections as prescribed in the ECM; (f) Provide 100 percent drought tolerant plants, as prescribed in ECM Appendix N; (g) Ensure that Functional Green landscapes provide a variety of ecosystem services by providing a minimum of 3 different Functional Green Landscape Elements, 2 which must be living elements; trees and shrubs/ornamental grasses of different sizes may count independently as different elements; and (h) Prepare and submit an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) plan for the proposed development, as prescribed in the ECM. (i) The following note shall be added …
EC Key CodeNEXT Watershed Proposals 11/1/2017 FUNCTIONAL GREEN A Component of the Proposed Revised Landscape Code 1 - F E B - 1 7 1 Functional Green Landscape Code Integrates nature Provides flexibility Is straightforward Functional Green is a new tool in the City’s landscape code tool chest. It applies to sites with an IC allowance over 80% and is designed for getting nature into these dense urban sites. Functional Green integrates nature into parcels where building cover or other impervious surfaces limit what the standard landscape code can accomplish. It gives developers a planning tool that is flexible and provides ecological benefits comparable to those achieved by the standard landscape code. And it provides a program that is straightforward and clear to implement and review. 2 Ecosystem Services Microclimate Regulation Water Filtration Carbon Storage and Sequestration Biodiversity Benefits Human Well‐Being Air Pollutant Removal Stormwater Retention Effects on Developable Area Effects on Property Value Functional Green is based on the science of “ecosystem services,” the important benefits that people receive from healthy functioning ecosystems. A consultant team reviewed over 120 scientific, environmental studies, identifying ecological and economic benefits that could be expected from each Landscape Element in Austin’s geography and climate. We chose 8 Ecosystem Service benefits to base the Functional Green landscape code on: • • • • • • • • Microclimate Regulation Water Filtration Carbon Storage and Sequestration Biodiversity Benefits Human Well‐Being Air Pollutant Removal Stormwater Retention Effects on Developable Area Effects on Property Value 3 Ecosystem Services of Functional Green Landscape Elements The draft brochure from February of 2018, illustrates the relative benefits provided by each landscape element in a bar‐graph format. 4 EC Key CodeNEXT Watershed Proposals 11/1/2017 FUNCTIONAL GREEN How it Works The designer of a development chooses what landscape to provide by selecting from a menu of Functional Green landscape elements. 5 Menu of Landscape Options Vegetated (green) walls Porous paving Vegetated (green) roofs Irrigation with Auxiliary Water Source Rain Gardens Existing & new trees The landscape element menu includes, for example: • • • • • • Existing and new trees Vegetated (green) walls Vegetated (green) roofs Porous paving Rain gardens Irrigation with Auxiliary Water Source 6 Functional Green Score Area of Landscape Element A x Factor A + Area of Landscape Element B x Factor B + Area of Landscape Element C x Factor C Total Site Area …
Palm District Planning Initiative Urban Design Commission May 24, 2021 Content Project Background Study Area Project Scope Project Team How to Get Involved Project Background Engage stakeholders and the public to develop a shared vision for a complex, culturally rich, and rapidly transforming part of downtown Austin that includes: ▪ Palm School Palm Park Convention Center ▪ Waller Creek ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Red River Cultural District ESB-Mexican American Cultural Center Proposed Mexican American Heritage Corridor And more…. 4 Resolution 20190523-029 ▪ Palm School Negotiations ▪ Rainey Street District Fund ▪ Fifth Street Mexican American Heritage Corridor ▪ Convention Center Expansion ▪ District Planning Process ▪ Improved Connectivity 5 Recent Planning History ▪ Waller Creek Master Plan (2010) ▪ Downtown Austin Plan (2011) ▪ Imagine Austin (2012) ▪ Waller Creek Design Plan (2012) ▪ Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life ▪ Downtown Austin Wayfinding Master Plan (2013) ▪ Convention Center Master Plan (2013) (2015) ▪ ESB-MACC Master Plan (2018) ▪ Project Connect Vision (2019) ▪ Brush Square Master Plan (2019) ▪ UT Analysis of Convention Center Expansion (2019) ▪ Convention Center Master Plan Update (2020) ▪ Urban Land Institute Study of IH 35 (2020) …and more 6 Study Area 8 History of Study Area ▪ Long, layered history ▪ Palm School dates back to the 1890s ▪ Palm District originally part of East Austin ▪ Mexican-Americans, African- Americans and German Immigrants called Palm district home 9 PICA 21043 Austin History Center, Austin Public Library Historic Connection To East Austin 10 CO3746 Austin History Center, Austin Public Library Sir Swante Palm School 11 Sir Swante Palm School 12 waterloogreenway.org Sir Swante Palm Neighborhood Park 13 Sir Swante Palm Neighborhood Park 14 PICA 04088 Austin History Center, Austin Public Library Waller Creek 15 Waller Creek Tunnel 16 waterloogreenway.org Waterloo Greenway/Waterloo Park 17 texasfreeways.com I-35 18 texasfreeways.com I-35 19 texasfreeways.com I-35 20 I-35 21 statesman.com: Photo Credit, Jay Jannier Project Connect and Downtown Transit Station 22 Neil Kocurek Memorial Austin Convention Center 23 Brush Square/O. Henry Museum 24 Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center (ESB-MACC) 25 Rainey Street Neighborhood & Historic District 26 lostinaustin.org: Photo Credit, Will Taylor Rainey Street Neighborhood & Historic District 27 Rainey Street Neighborhood & Historic District 28 Sixth Street Historic and Entertainment District 29 lostinaustin.org: Photo Credit, Will Taylor Red River Cultural District 30 Innovation District 31 KXAN.com m o c . N A X K 32 …
Versión en español a continuación. Regular Meeting of the Municipal Civil Service Commission Monday, May 24, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Municipal Civil Service Commission to be held Monday, May 24, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (Sunday, May 23, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Municipal Civil Service Commission Meeting, members of the public must: • Call or email the board liaison at Matthew.Chustz@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-2859 no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, and a telephone number or email address. • Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to Matthew.Chustz@austintexas.gov by Noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. • If this meeting is broadcast live, residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Municipal Civil Service Commission Lunes, Mayo 24, 2021 a 9:00 a.m. La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (Domingo, Mayo 23, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o un envíe correo en electrónico Matthew.Chustz@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-2859 a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). La información requerida es el nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, y un número de teléfono o dirección de correo electrónico. enlace junta de la al • Una vez …
2021 Municipal Civil Service Commission Regular Meeting Schedule Monday, January 11, 2021 Monday, June 28, 2021 Monday, January 25, 2021 Monday, July 12, 2021 Monday, February 8, 2021 Monday, July 26, 2021 Monday, February 22, 2021 Monday, August 9, 2021 Monday, March 8, 2021 Monday, August 23, 2021 Monday, March 22, 2021 Monday, September 13, 2021 Monday, April 12, 2021 Monday, September 27, 2021 Monday, April 26, 2021 Monday, October 11, 2021 Monday, May 10, 2021 Monday, October 25, 2021 Monday, May 24, 2021 Monday, November 8, 2021 Monday, June 14, 2021 Monday, December 13, 2021 The 2021 MCS Commission Meeting Schedule was approved at the October 26, 2020 MCS Commission meeting.
MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION August 10, 2020 Letter Regarding MCS Review Dear Mayor and Council: Sincerely, As you know, the Municipal Civil Service Commission sent a recommendation for council action dated November 8, 2019. We are not aware of any action that has been taken. Enclosed please find a copy of that letter and its attachments. Chair Pamela Lancaster Vice Chair Melissa Rogers Commissioner Rebecca Eisenbrey Commissioner Erika Kane Commissioner Teresa Peréz-Wiseley Teresa Peréz-Wiseley Pamela Lancaster MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20191108-4B Date: November 8, 2019 Subject: Review and report of Municipal Civil Service Commission denial of promotion and discharge appeals. Motioned By: Pamela Lancaster, Chair Seconded By: Rebecca Eisenbrey, Commissioner Recommendation The Municipal Civil Service Commission recommends Council direct the appropriate City official to review granted denial of promotion and discharge appeals, gather data, and report the findings of the review back to the Commission. Description of Recommendation to Council The Commission requests that the City Council direct the appropriate City official to: 1) Identify each appeal that the Commission granted from an employee who sought to overturn a discharge or denial of promotion; 2) For each such granted appeal, identify the effect of the appeal, including but not limited to the employee's position, rate of pay and any other relevant information regarding the employee before and after the appeal was granted; 3) For each such employee who had an appeal granted, identify whether the employee is still employed with the City and if so, the employee's position; 4) For each such employee who had an appeal granted, identify whether the employee has applied for any promotions or transfers and, if so, the result of such application; 5) For each such employee who had an appeal granted, identify whether the employee has been disciplined or placed on a performance improvement plan, and, if so, the nature and outcome of such disciplinary action or performance improvement plan; and 6) Report the finding of such review back to the Commission Rationale: The MCS Commission is a five-member commission established by the City Charter that, among other things, hears appeals and makes final, binding decisions in the case of any municipal civil service employee who is discharged, suspended, demoted, denied a promotion, or put on disciplinary probation. The first appeal hearing heard by this Commission was in September 2014 and it has been approximately five years since that date. 1of2 The Commission …
MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, April 26, 2021 REGULAR MEETING Monday, April 26, 2021 MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES The Municipal Civil Service Commission convened in a regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, April 26, 2021 via videoconferencing. Chair Peréz-Wiseley called the Commission meeting to order at 9:03 a.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Teresa Peréz-Wiseley, Chair Melissa Rogers, Vice-Chair Rebecca Eisenbrey Erika Kane Commissioners Absent: Pamela Lancaster Staff in Attendance: Matthew Chustz, Municipal Civil Service Administrator April Shaw, Municipal Civil Service Coordinator Michael Sullivan, Civil Service Coordinator Mecia Griffin, Civil Service Coordinator Brent Waters, Civil Service Intern Crystal Contreras, HRIS Support 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 22, 2021. a. Approve the minutes from the Municipal Civil Service Commission regular meeting on The minutes of the March 22, 2021 regular meeting were approved on Vice-Chair Rogers’ motion, Commissioner Kane’s second, on a vote of 4-0. a. Conduct a hearing on the appeal filed by Michael Girod regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. A hearing was conducted on the appeal filed by Michael Girod regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. 2. HEARING 1 MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, April 26, 2021 b. Deliberate in open or closed session, pursuant to 551.074 of the Texas Government Code (personnel exception), regarding the appeal of Michael Girod regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. Chair Peréz-Wiseley recessed the Municipal Civil Service Commission meeting to go to closed session at 5:38 p.m. The Commission deliberated in closed session on the appeal filed by Michael Girod regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. Closed session ended and Chair Peréz-Wiseley called the Municipal Civil Service Commission meeting back to order at 6:20 p.m. c. Possible action and decision on the appeal filed by Michael Girod regarding their Denial of Promotion from the Public Works Department. The motion to grant Michael Girod’s appeal, place him in the position at issue and award him any lost pay or benefits from the date the individual was placed in the position was approved on Commissioner Eisenbrey’s motion, Vice-Chair Rogers’ second, on a vote of 4-0. 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on the Municipal Civil Service Commission recommendation to City Council (Recommendation 20191108-04B) regarding the review of granted denial of promotion and discharge appeals. b. Discussion and review of the Municipal Civil Service Rules …
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting Monday, May 24th, 2021, 6:00 PM Historic Landmark Meeting to be held May 24th, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (Sunday, May 23rd by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the May 24th Historic Landmark Commission Meeting, members of the public must: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Sunday, May 23 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. • If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion (24 de mayo, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (23 de mayo, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET PC DATE: N/A HLC DATE: May 24, 2021 CASE NUMBER: GF-2021-050281 APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed initiation) HISTORIC NAME: N/A WATERSHED: Waller Creek, Lady Bird Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 905 E. 2nd Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from single family residence (SF-3) – neighborhood plan to single family residence – neighborhood plan – historic landmark (SF-3-H) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: N/A PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The property is recommended eligible as a City of Austin landmark and individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places in the 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey. CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Barrio Unido Neighborhood Assn., Capital Metro, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Association, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, El Concilio Mexican -American Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association , Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town, Waterloo Greenway BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The home at 905 E. 2nd Street was built around 1906. It is a one-story, L-plan, Folk Victorian house with cross-hipped metal roof; horizontal wood siding; a partial-width, shed-roofed porch with chamfered posts and jig-sawn brackets; and 2:2 wood windows with screens. The building retains integrity, with extant original windows and decorative details—uncommon for homes of this age in the area. Historical associations: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey identifies the property as an integral resource associated with East Austin’s development patterns, demographic shifts, and resident lifeways. The building was consistently occupied by middle- to working-class renters whose occupations and terms of residency were dependent upon the growth of the greater East Austin area. The demographic shift from residents of Anglo and European-American descent to those of Latino descent during the 1950s is indicative of larger demographic trends in East Austin. Thus, the building’s historical associations exemplify general residency patterns in East Austin. ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A PHONE: 512-974-2727 ACTION: N/A PARCEL NO.: 0204050604 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 10 BLK 4 OLT 17 DIV O HARRINGTON SUBD ESTIMATED ANNUAL …
T 1 N E T PROPOSED METAL ROOF T E N T 1 ALL WINDOW TRIM TO MATCH EXISTING. ALL EXTERIOR SIDING TO REMAIN WHITE TO MATCH EXISTING SIDING. SCREENED FRONT DOOR WITH TRANSOME WINDOW, POSTS, RAILING, BRACKETS TO MATCH OLD DETAILS AS PER PROVIDED PICTURE. BUILDING HEIGHT FROM AGP TOP = 8'0" HORIZONTAL SIDINGTO MATCH EXISTING SIDING PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR EXISTING FFE = 477.2' TOP = 9'6" FFE = 467.6' NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" " 0 - ' 2 2 HGP = 466' AGP = 465.95' LGP = 465.9' www.ahsdesigngroup.com 512-577-3644 RB ARCHITECTS PLLC NOVEMBER 2020 T E E R T S D N 2 T S A E 5 0 9 2 0 7 8 7 X T - N I T S U A L E D O M E R N O I T I D D A H T I W NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" A-201
T 1 N E T PROPOSED METAL ROOF TO MATCH EXISTING ROOF BUILDING HEIGHT FROM AGP TOP = 8'0" HORIZONTAL WHITE SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING SIDING EXISTING FFE = 477.2' TOP = 9'6" FFE = 467.6' T E N T 1 ALL WINDOW TRIM TO MATCH EXISTING. ALL EXTERIOR SIDING TO REMAIN WHITE TO MATCH EXISTING SIDING. SCREENED FRONT DOOR WITH TRANSOME WINDOW, POSTS, RAILING, BRACKETS TO MATCH OLD DETAILS AS PER PROVIDED PICTURE. PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR / " 8 7 1 1 - ' 1 2 HGP = 466' AGP = 465.95' LGP = 465.9' NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" www.ahsdesigngroup.com 512-577-3644 RB ARCHITECTS PLLC NOVEMBER 2020 T E E R T S D N 2 T S A E 5 0 9 2 0 7 8 7 X T - N I T S U A L E D O M E R N O I T I D D A H T I W NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" A-201
SARAH SMITH AND BRYAN THOMPSON 905 E 2ND STREET AUSTIN TX REMODEL WITH SQFT ADDITION SF3-NP SHEET INDEX General Drawings G-001 G-002 COVER SHEET NOTES Architectural Site Plans AS-001 AS-002 AS-003 SITE PLAN SURVEY TREE PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN FLOOR PLANS ELEVATIONS SECTIONS ROOF PLAN A - 101 FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION... A-102 A-103 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-201 A-202 A-203 A-204 NORTHEAST ELEVATION SOUTHWEST ELEVATION NORTHWEST ELEVATION SOUTHEAST ELEVATION A-301 BUILDING SECTION A A-302 ROOF PLAN ELECTRICAL PLANS A-401 A-402 FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-501 A-502 KITCHEN BATHROOMS WINDOW SCHEDULE A-601 WINDOW SCHEDULE www.ahsdesigngroup.com 512-577-3644 RB ARCHITECTS PLLC NOVEMBER 2020 T E E R T S D N 2 T S A E 5 0 9 2 0 7 8 7 X T - N I T S U A L E D O M E R N O I T I D D A H T I W COVER SHEET SCALE 1' = 1'-0", 1" = 20', 1:274.29 G-001 www.ahsdesigngroup.com 512-577-3644 RB ARCHITECTS PLLC NOVEMBER 2020 T E E R T S D N 2 T S A E 5 0 9 2 0 7 8 7 X T - N I T S U A L E D O M E R N O I T I D D A H T I W SURVEY SCALE 1:51 AS-002 EXISTING BEDROOM PORCH UP NEW STAIRCASE TO NEW SECOND FLOOR NEW LIVING AREA NEW PATIO EXISTING BEDROOM EXISTING LIVING ROOM EXISTING KITCHEN AREA NEW DINING AREA F WALL TO BE BUILT WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" www.ahsdesigngroup.com 512-577-3644 RB ARCHITECTS PLLC NOVEMBER 2020 T E E R T S D N 2 T S A E 5 0 9 2 0 7 8 7 X T - N I T S U A L E D O M E R N O I T I D D A H T I W FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE 3/16" = 1'-0" A - 101 2'-0" : 5 2 1 EXISTING ROOF 2'-0" 12:5 METAL ROOF 12:5 : 5 2 1 2'-0" " 0 - ' 2 12:5 " 0 - ' 2 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" www.ahsdesigngroup.com 512-577-3644 RB ARCHITECTS PLLC NOVEMBER 2020 T E E R T S D N 2 T S A E 5 0 9 2 0 7 8 7 X T - …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: May 24, 2021 PC DATE: N/A CASE NUMBER: Pending APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission OWNERS: Erika and Patrick Brosnan HISTORIC NAME: Posey House WATERSHED: Boggy Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1304 Bob Harrison Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence – neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence – historic landmark – neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: N/A PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The house was recommended as a contributing property in a potential historic district by the East Austin Historic Resources Survey (2016). CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A CASE MANAGER: Cara Bertron NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Bike Austin, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, Friends of AustinNeighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United forProgress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Swede Hill Neighborhood Association BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The Posey House, built around 1924 by Samuel Posey, is significant as a modest example of the National Folk style. The one-story house is clad in board and batten wood siding and capped with a pyramidal roof with two pipe chimneys and exposed rafter tails. Features include non-original vinyl-sash windows and a non-original flush wood door, which are respectively proposed to be replaced with 2-over-2 double-hung clad-wood windows and a wood door that are in keeping with likely original elements. A partial-width entry porch has a shed roof covered in corrugated metal and supported by square columns. Historical Associations: The Posey House is significant for its association with Samuel Posey and his descendants, working-class African Americans who purchased and maintained a home for decades at a time when few financial, policy, and legal resources were available to Black families. Two generations of the Posey family lived in the house for more than 45 years, until at least 1969. Appraisal district records show that the Poseys sold the house in 1998, after 75 years of ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A PHONE: 512-974-1446 ACTION: N/A ownership. This longstanding association represents an example of a definable group of people in early- to mid-20th century Austin. Samuel and Clara Posey built their home at 1304 Bob Harrison Street between 1922 and 1924, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 24, 2021 HR-2021-044151 1304 BOB HARRISON STREET POSEY HOUSE A.2 – 1 PROPOSAL Partially demolish a ca. 1924 house; construct a rear addition. The house was recommended as a contributing resource to a potential historic district by the East Austin Historic Resource Survey (2016). The Historic Landmark Commission initiated historic zoning on April 26, 2021 and will consider recommending historic zoning on May 24, 2021. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project involves ten parts: with matching materials and profiles. 1) Repair of the front porch. If elements must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, they will be replaced in-kind, 2) Replacement of all vinyl-sash windows with 2-over-2 double-hung clad-wood windows in existing window openings. 3) Replacement of the existing door with a period-appropriate wood door. 4) Replacement of the asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof. 5) Addition of skylights on secondary (east and west) roof slopes. 6) Repair existing wood siding, trim, and rafter tails. 7) Demolition of side and rear additions. 8) Demolition of a rear deck. 9) Construction of a rear addition with a footprint of 600 square feet. The addition consists of 2-story and 1-story portions clad in vertical metal siding and capped by flat roofs. Windows are casement and fixed aluminum-sash. It is set back behind the historic portion of the existing building, nearly 30’ from the front wall. 10) Construction of a concrete deck behind the addition. ARCHITECTURE One-story house clad in board and batten wood siding and capped with a pyramidal roof with exposed rafter tails. Features include vinyl-sash windows, a flush wood replacement door, and two pipe chimneys. A partial-width entry porch has a shed roof covered in corrugated metal and supported by square columns. STANDARDS FOR REVIEW Repair and Alterations The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects on historic landmarks. The following standards would apply to the proposed project if the property were designated as a landmark: General Standards 1.1 Do not remove intact historic material from the exterior of a building. 1.2 Always attempt repair first. Replacement should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary, and for the smallest area possible. 1.3 When historic material must be replaced due to damage or deterioration, replacement material should look the same, perform reliably within the existing construction, and, in …
