3 - 115 E 5th St - presentation — original pdf
Backup
All documents
4 - 3909 Avenue G - drawings — original pdf
THIS DRAWING IS FOR REVIEW/PRICING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTTION Project: REMODEL FOR Flanagan-Heierman House 3909 Avenue G Austin,Texas ISSUE DATE A2.0 THIS DRAWING IS FOR REVIEW/PRICING PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTTION Project: REMODEL FOR Flanagan-Heierman House 3909 Avenue G Austin,Texas ISSUE DATE A2.1
5 - 200 W 6th St - signage — original pdf
JULY 18, 2022ATX_INDEED TOWER - EXTERIOR SIGNAGE EXHIBIT INDEED TOWER | EXISTING CONDITIONS SOUTHEAST CORNER - STREET LEVEL VIEW SOUTHEAST CORNER - STREET LEVEL VIEW EXTERIOR SIGNAGE EXHIBITS | JULY 18, 2022 | PAGE 2 INDEED TOWER | EXTERIOR SIGNAGE LOCATIONS BLOCK 71 SITE PLAN SIGN LOCATIONS BUILDING MOUNTED LETTERFORMS TENANT WINDOW GRAPHICS (20% OF RETAIL ELEVATION) FREESTANDING MONUMENTS PROJECTING BLADE SIGNS BUILDING ADDRESS SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARY (NR) BLOCK 71 EXISTING HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT 1.0 …
6 - 1602 Nickerson St - scope of work — original pdf
Overall scope of work for 1602 Nickerson St: 1. Repair damaged wooden siding; replace siding where rotted 2. Replace rotten or damaged trim 3. Paint entire house and trim; sanding to remove rough paint and removing old cables 4. Remove bricks from front porch elevation of house 5. Replace rotten or damaged drip guards on top of windows as needed 6. Replace front brick columns with craftsman style wood, add wood columns to center brick columns. 7. Replace front porch metal handrails with wooden handrails 8. Replace rotted porch beams Remove half of bricks, add cap to match center columns. Replace internal support column with proper Remove brick veneer from front elevation Replace framing and broken wood Replace boards to create seamless look Remove half of bricks, add cap to match center columns. Replace internal support column with proper Add 2 additional wooden center columns - adding additional support to remove sag Remove metal railings, replace with wooden railings on front and sides. Remove brick veneer from front elevation Design Idea for Column Replacement Column Design Inspiration Wood Handrail design Replacement handrail design Remove unused cabling from front of house Remove brick veneer, expose siding underneath. Repair damaged siding as needed. Otherwise, sand and paint siding. Repair/replace vent Replace window drip edges Replace wooden drip edge Repair concrete skirting Replace wood trim that covers support beam. (Replace support beam - separate estimate) Replace metal railing with wooden railing Replace rotted wood siding Replace rotted wood trim Replace drip edge above window Replace drip edge Repair concrete skirting Repair siding that is pulling away or rotten Replace wooden facade Rehang or remove gutters to avoid water overflowing on wood siding Replace metal railing with wooden railing Replace support beam if rotted Prevent water from overrunning gutters during rain Replace rotten siding And repair or replace other siding on side Replace all rotten siding and trim
7 - 1804 Brackenridge St - HLC drawings — original pdf
ST R UCT UR E O N A DJA CENT P R OP ER T Y 140.00' P R O P E R T Y L I N E 5 . 0 0 S E T B A C K L I N E 5 . 0 0 S E T B A C K L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E 140.00' VAR. W IDT H E A S E ME NT EX IST ING S INGL E STORY , S INGL E FA MILY R ES ID ENC E TO BE R E MO D E L E D / E NL A R G E D EXIST. GR A V EL W A L K A C EX IST . C O V E R E D PA T IO ' 3 3 . 9 4 E N I L Y T R E P O R P K L A W E D I S . T S I X E E N I L K C A B T E S 0 0 . 5 2 E N I L K C A B T E S 0 0 . 5 2 T E E R T S E G D I R N E K C A R B T E E R T S E G D I R N E K C A R B ST R UCT UR E O N A DJA CENT P R OP ER T Y 140.00' P R O P E R T Y L I N E N E W COV ER ED PATIO 5 . 0 0 S E T B A C K L I N E N E W T W O ST OR Y A DU 11.24' E N I L Y T R E P O R P E N I L K C A B T E S 0 0 . 0 1 Y E L L A ' 3 3 . 9 4 N E W C O NC R E T E DR IV E N E W DET A CHED G A R G E 5 . 0 0 S E T B A C K L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E 140.00' N E W UNC …
7 - 1804 Brackenridge St - photos — original pdf
Backup
8 - 2107 Brackenridge St - HLC plans — original pdf
2107 BRACKENRIDGE 2107 BRACKENRIDGE STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78704 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA CALCULATIONS: 58X171.63FT SWISHER ADDN LOT SIZE: 9911 SF Project: 2107 BRACKENRIDGE MTTR MGMT 213 590.2868 BEN@MA77ER.COM COA BUILDING COVERAGE: 3116 SF (MAX ALLOWABLE 40% = 2452 SF) COA IMPERVIOUS COVER: 3992 SF (MAX ALLOWABLE: 45% = 4460 SF) COA GROSS FLOOR AREA: 3731 SF (MAX ALLOWABLE 40% = 2452 SF) T S E G D I R N E K C A R B 7 0 1 2 4 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A DATE: 05/04/22 JOB #: 22.0504 SURVEY A0.0 SURVEY 1 24X36 SIZE SCALE: 1" = 15-0" (11X17 SIZE SCALE: 1" = 30'-0") All rights reserved. All designs, drawings, plans & specifications are the property of MTTR MGMT, LLC. Purchaser's rights are conditional & limited to a one-time use to construct a single project on the site & use is limited specifically to such property. The use or reproduction of these plans concerning any other construction is strictly prohibited without the written permission of MTTR MGMT, LLC SITE NOTES: 1. 2. 3. 4. ALL F.F.E. HEIGHTS ARE LISTED ON THE ELEVATIONS. PLEASE LOOK TO THE A3 AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS IN ORDER TO COORDINATE. ALL HEIGHTS ARE ESTIMATIONS BASED ON THE SURVEY. VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS IN FIELD WITH A SURVEYOR AND COORDINATE IF ANY DISCREPANCY IS DISCOVERED. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE SUGGESTIONS ONLY. COORDINATE ALL FINAL UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INSTALLATION TYPE WITH UTILITY CONTRACTORS. FINAL SLAB HEIGHTS ARE BASED ON THE ENGINEERS DRAWINGS. COORDINATE IF ANY DISCREPANCY IS DISCOVERD PRIOR TO FORM WORK BEING INSTALLED. LEGEND AC EM GM WM WH w A/C UNIT ELEC. METER GAS METER WATER METER WATER HEATER WATER WASTE WATER POOL EQUIP POOL EQUIPMENT -4" LIVING 10' CLG DINING 10' CLG KITCHEN 10' CLG -4" MASTER BEDROOM 10' CLG BEDROOM B 10' CLG NO STEP -4" BEDROOM A 10' CLG BEDROOM A 10' CLG PANTRY REF NO STEP -4" KITCHEN 10' CLG FIRST FLOOR GFA 2172 SF OFFICE BUILT IN UP TO 2 DINING 10' CLG LIVING 10' CLG PANTRY REF UP TO 2 OFFICE BUILT IN UP FROM 1 BEDROOM B 10' CLG MASTER CLOSET NO STEP -4" MASTER CLOSET ATTIC LADDERSECOND FLOOR GFA 1802 SF NO STEP -4" CHASE LINEN MASTER BEDROOM 10' CLG CHASE UP FROM 1 TOTAL GFA 3974 SF HVAC CLOSET NO STEP -4" GFA CALCULATIONS 3 …
8 - 2107 Brackenridge St - photos — original pdf
Backup
Item 12 Revised FY23 AE Budget Presentation — original pdf
Item 12 Fiscal Year 2023 Proposed Budget Presentation Electric Utility Commission August 8, 2022 © 2022 Austin Energy Disclaimer Certain information set forth in this presentation contains forecasted financial information. Forecasts necessarily involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance. Although the forecasted financial information contained in this presentation is based upon what Austin Energy management believes are reasonable assumptions, there can be no assurance that forecasted financial information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such forecasts. In addition, this presentation contains unaudited information and should be read in conjunction with the audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports for the City of Austin, which was published on March 14, 2022: http://finance.austintexas.gov/web/controller/annual_comprehensive_financial_report/annual_comprehensi ve_financial_report_2021.pdf 2 Agenda • Budget Adoption Schedule • Proposed Budget Summary • Financial Health • Major Business Unit Discussions • Proposed Tariff and Fee Changes 3 Fiscal Year 2023 Proposed Budget Presentation Budget Adoption Schedule 4 FY 2023 Budget Adoption Schedule • July 15 – City Manager Proposed Budget Presentation • Aug 2 – Set max tax rate and budget & tax rate hearings – City Council • Aug 2 – Set public hearing on Austin Energy rates & fee schedule – City Council • Aug 8 – Electric Utility Commission Proposed Budget Presentation • August 9, 11 – Budget work sessions – City Council • August 17-19 – Budget readings and adoption – City Council • Budget public input meeting (August 17) • Public hearing on Austin Energy rates and fee schedule (August 17) • September 29 – Propose updated FY 2023 Power Supply Adjustment, Community Benefit Charge, and Regulatory charge 5 Fiscal Year 2023 Proposed Budget Presentation Proposed Budget Summary 6 Austin Energy’s Share of the FY 2023 City Budget Austin Energy’s total Expenditure Budget of $1.6B in FY 2023 is 30% of the City of Austin’s total expenditures budget of $5.0B 7 FY 2023 Austin Energy Fund Summary ($millions) Beginning Balance Revenue/Transfers In Expenditures Operating Expenses Power Supply Expenses Debt Service CIP Transfer General Fund Transfer Other Transfers & Requirements Total Expenditures Excess (Deficiency) Ending Balance (Adjusted) FTEs FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Change from FY 2022 Amended to FY 2023 Proposed Actual Actual Estimated Amended Proposed $413.4 $1,389.9 $387.8 $1,288.8 $234.3 $1,501.6 …
2 July 2022 Animal Services Report — original pdf
July 2022 July 2022 Animal Services Report AUSTIN ANIMAL SERVICES REPORT Animal Services News • The live outcome rate for July was 96.73 percent. • A total of 1,240 animals were brought to the shelter which included 697 dogs, 460 cats, 47 wild animals, 12 rabbits, 11 guinea pigs, five fish, three domestic birds, and one snake. • A total of 681 animals were adopted (363 cats, 313 dogs, and 5 small pets). • A total of 108 dogs, cats, and birds were returned to their owners (RTOs and RTO-Adopt). • Animal Protection Officers (APOs) returned 26 animals to their owners in the field. • Officers handed out 21 fencing assistance applications and implanted 7 microchips. • Officers impounded 182 injured animals and delivered 103 wildlife animals to Austin Wildlife Rescue. • Officers entered 202 rabies exposure reports and submitted 47 specimens for rabies testing. Four bats tested positive for rabies and an additional six were considered non-negative due to being too decomposed to test. • 6 total coyote related activities (for Travis County) o 4 sightings o 1 encounters o 1 incidents • Out of 6 coyote related activities, 6 fell within the reported behavior types (sighting, encounter, and incident) • Encounters: • Incidents: o 1 encounter involved a coyote attacking a domestic animal o 1 incident involved a coyote attacking a domestic animal Volunteer, Foster, and Rescue Programs • A total of 351 volunteers donated 5,113 hours of volunteer service. Animal Protection July 2022 Animal Services Report • The Volunteer Coordinators held five orientations for new volunteers in July, introducing 211 people to the shelter programs. 82 new volunteers attended their first training or mentor shifts in June. • 26 Community Service Restitution individuals performed 123 hours of laundry, dishes, and other duties as assigned. • 162 animals were adopted directly from foster care. • More than 280 different individuals/families fostered. • 254 new foster applications were processed. (This number does not include walk-in / in person applications that were processed.) • There are currently 1,142 members (approved fosters) in the foster program’s GivePulse group. • 10 pets died or were euthanized in foster care. • As of August 2, 6:55 a.m., there were 412 animals in foster care. • 197 animals were transferred to 21 in-state AAC Rescue Partners (compared to 244 animals for July 2021). • 65 dogs were transported to 10 out-of-state AAC Rescue Partners …
ITEM-10 BOA BAAP_LATE BACKUP-UPDATE — original pdf
TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M Mayor and Council July 27, 2022 Denise Lucas, Director, Development Services Department Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program - Staff Response to Resolution No. 20211014-045 On October 14, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 20211014-045 directing the City Manager to explore the creation of a Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program (BAAP) for residential homestead applicants who are requesting a hardship variance or special exception. Staff have explored the creation of BAAP as well as a funding source. The staff focus for Board of Adjustment variance requests was narrowed to Residential Homestead Variances under a Zoning Variance or a Special Exception Variance. These are the two types of variance requests which cover the Council’s intended area of support. Based on previous variance request applications, staff anticipates 9 variance requests could be 100% financially supported each year at an approximate cost of $10,000 per year. The funding source for BAAP Fund for the financial support would come from the General Fund and would be budgeted each year. In addition, staff has identified an existing contract, managed by Austin Public Health, which will allow applicants access to pro-bono legal services. Collectively, the BAAP Fund will support fee waivers or reductions for applicants who meet the eligibility criteria; as well as pro bono assistance with navigating the application process and subsequent proceedings. Staff recommends creation of the BAAP Fund, which includes a recommended start date of October 1, 2022. Staff will await further direction from the City Council. If the Council adopts an action to create the BAAP Fund, staff will create the BAAP Fund program guidelines and will track program participants and outcomes for one year and report that information back to Council. Should you have questions or need additional information, please contact Doron Silberstein, Equity and Inclusion Program Manager, at doron.silberstein@austintexas.gov or (512) 978-1732. xc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager Anne Morgan, Acting City Manager J. Rodney Gonzales, Assistant City Manager
Play video — original link
Play video
20220808-002: Regarding Proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Austin Energy Budget — original pdf
ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220808-002 August 8, 2022 Proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Austin Energy Budget Date: Subject: Motioned By: Commissioner Chapman Recommendation The Electric Utility Commission endorses the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Austin Energy budget with the following modifications: Description of Recommendation to Council Seconded By: Commissioner Jonker • The EUC wants to make it clear that in endorsing the Austin Energy FY 2023 budget, we are not endorsing changes related to the proposed base rate increase introduced by Austin Energy on April 18th. • Additional costs related to the Fayette Coal Plant as laid out in the budget should be carefully scrutinized by city council given the stated goal of getting out of coal by the end of the year. • City Council should authorize funding in FY 2023 for an update to the 2015 Decommissioning study to determine if the budgetary set-aside of $8 million dollars per year to the non-nuclear decommissioning fund is the appropriate amount. • With nearly half of Austin’s population living in rental housing, we recommend the Council review current efforts by Austin Energy to make improvements to energy efficiency programs and ensure equity in access to efficiency programs. • Funding for direct install weatherization programs and multi-family programs have remained stagnant in FY 2023 as proposed. The EUC recommends that Council work with Austin Energy to increase the budgets of multi-family and home weatherization programs proportionally to the overall increase in the Customer Energy Solutions budget. In order to assess community concerns with potential groundwater contamination in the area of the coal plant, City Council should authorize up to $100,000 in additional groundwater testing for a third-party to conduct focused testing of groundwater and water wells in the immediate area. Chair Hopkins, Vice Chair Tuttle, Commissioner Chapman, Commissioner Ferchill, Commissioner Hadden, Commissioner Jonker, Commissioner Reed, Commissioner Trostle • Vote For: Against: None Abstain: None 1 of 2 Absent: Commissioner Bowen, Commissioner Funkhauser Attest: Robin Otto, Staff Liaison 2 of 2
Video Mtg August 8 2022 — original link
Play video
BOA ATTENDANCE AND SIGN IN SHEETS FOR AUG 8 — original pdf
Backup
Play video — original link
Play video
Backup_2022 08 08 ATCFPB - Strategic Planning Prep Presentation — original pdf
Austin-Travis County Food Policy Board Strategic Planning Presentation to the ATCFPB – August, 2022 What is a Food System? Food for Thought State of the Food System 2022 A Baseline Assessment The State of The Food System 2022–an update to SOFTS 2015 and 2018. Provides a brief history of the Austin Food System Each section contains Overview, Trends and Challenges, Policy Actions, Key Questions & Facts Food Production Food Production Key Question: How might more of the food consumed in Austin be grown or produced locally? Current State Policy Actions ❖ 53 community gardens, 218 school gardens, & 3 food forests in Austin. ❖ Fruits & vegetables are only 3.4% of county food production ❖ Farm land is overwhelmly owned by white men ❖ Freedom Colonies & the 1928 Master Plan ❖ Urban Farm Ordinance ❖ Water use in Texas ❖ Austin Climate Equity Plan Food Processing & Distribution Key Question: How can we strengthen increased economic development, workforce development, and worker ownership in the food processing sector? Current State Policy Actions ❖ 166 CPF’s & 114 Food Manufacturing sites in Travis County ❖ Over 4000 employed in Food Manufacturing & Processing sector ❖ 0 Food Hubs ❖ Food Enterprises Permits ❖ Food Hub Feasibility Study ❖ Nourish Austin Food Production Food Markets and Retail Key Question: What role can food businesses play in food system resilience and disaster response efforts? Current State Policy Actions ❖ 2021–72% of TX restaurants are short-staffed ❖ Travis County food service workers average $11.25/hr ❖ 25 Farmers Markets, 18 CSA’s ❖ $2.3 billion food production–consumption gap in Central Texas. ❖ Neighborhood Pop Up Grocery ❖ Farmers’ markets permitting & fees ❖ Community-owned retail establishment (ARPA $) Food Production Food Consumption and Access Key Question: How can access to nutritious, healthy, and culturally relevant food be ensured throughout a person’s entire lifespan? Current State Policy Actions ❖ 101 of Supermarkets, 583 Convenience Stores ❖ 14.4% Food Insecurity in Travis County. ❖ 46% of Eligible Population for SNAP has yet to enroll ➢ SNAP Vehicle Asset Test + other barrier ❖ Top 10 211 calls related to food access come from the Eastern Crescent. ❖ Fresh for Less ❖ Charitable Feeding Organization permitting ❖ Austin Climate Equity Plan ❖ Farmers Market Nutrition Program Food Production Post Consumption and Food Waste Key Question: How might we reduce food insecurity through the coordination and donation of surplus food? …
Play audio — original link
Play audio
Item-3 C16-2022-0004 PP DS 10-10-22 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item-3 DATE: August 8, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2022-0004 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Ryan Nill ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Michael Von Ohlen OUT ___-____Nicholl Wade OUT ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Apple Tree Holdings LLC-Tony Nguyen ADDRESS: 4507 IH 35 SVRD NB VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign District Regulations): (B) (2) (b) (i) to exceed sign area of 107 square feet (maximum allowed) to 200 square a) feet (requested) and (B) (3) (a) to exceed sign height of 35 feet (maximum allowed) to 50 feet (requested) in b) order to provide signage for a multi-tenant professional office in a “LO-NP”, Limited Office- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Upper Boggy Creek Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-123 Expressway Corridor Sign Regulations (B) This subsection prescribes regulations for freestanding signs. (1) One freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Additional freestanding signs may be permitted under Section 25-10-131 (Additional Freestanding Signs Permitted). (2) The sign area may not exceed: (a)on a lot with not more than 86 linear feet of street frontage, 60 square feet; or (b) on a lot width more than 86 linear feet of street frontage, the lesser of: (i) 0.7 square feet for each linear foot of street frontage; or (ii) 300 square feet. (B) This subsection prescribes regulations for freestanding signs. (3)The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (a) 35 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (b) 20 feet above grade at the base of the sign. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JUNE 13, 2022 POSTPONED TO JULY 11, 2022 (AE DENIAL); JULY 11, 2022 POSTPONED TO AUGUST 8, 2022 BY BOARD (AE DENIAL); Aug 8, 2022 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Brooke Bailey motions to postpone to October 10, 2022; Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 10, 2022. FINDING: because: OR, OR, AND, 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon …
Item-4 C15-2022-0046 PP DS 9-12-22 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item-4 DATE: Monday August 08, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0046 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Ryan Nill ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___A____Richard Smith ABSTAINED ___-____Michael Von Ohlen OUT ___-____Nicholl Wade OUT ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Y____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Ricca Keepers OWNER: Leslie Socha ADDRESS: 1101 QUAKER RIDGE DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Street Side Yard Setback from 15 feet (required) to 10 feet (requested), in order to erect an addition above the garage in a “SF-2”, Single-Family zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA meeting Aug 8, 2022 Due to lack of board members applicant requests to postpone, Chair Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to September 12, 2022; Board member Melissa Hawthorne second on 8-0-1 vote (Board member Richard Smith abstained); POSTPONED TO September 12, 2022. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ___________________________ Madam Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for