Planning Commission Working Group Commercial Parkland Dedication Amendments 8/8/2022 Amendment # Commissioner Section Pg # Proposed Amendment References and Notes (if needed) PARD Staff Response Cox §25-1-601 (C) 1 Add parkland dedication / fee exemption for small businesses - need to define size of "small business" - 5,000 SF suggested via stakeholder feedback Text Change Included i YES Cox §25-1-601 (C) 1 Add parkland dedication / fee exemption for certain arts and culture uses - need to define uses - music venues and museums suggested via stakeholder feedback YES Cox §25-1-602 4 Add parkland dedication / fee credit for private maintenance of public parkland dedicated - a minimum of 10% credit and up to a maximum of 25% credit at the discretion of the Director based on the estimated value of the approved Parkland Development and Maintenance Agreement YES Cox §25-1-607 10 Parkland dedication and fee-in-lieu assessment is set at the time of site plan submission and the assessment does not change throughout the development process, unless the project substantially changes in nature TBD For - Vesting the fee rate at time of SDP submittal might provide more certainty in the financing for developers and reduce workload for staff at the end of September issuing fees prior to Oct 1. Vesting fees to SDP submittal would require City Council to add language to the budget adoption ordinance. Part 3 of the adopting ordinance language below would need to be modified. Neutral - This has a minimal impact on the outcomes of the ordinance, but may open the ordinance to increased legal scrutiny as not all developments are treated equally, unless it can be shown that there is no impact on parkland by new commercial development less than 5,000 sq ft. Would likely also exempt any commercial space proposed with VMU developments as well as most fast-food chains (average McDonalds is 4,000 sq ft, average Chipotle is 2,580 sq ft). Exemption would not apply if critical connection or greenbelt gap is identified on site. Staff recommends tying the minimum requirement to the functional population, so if a commercial development was small enough to produce less than 1 whole functional population, it would be exempt (4,256 sq ft for retail) Neutral - This has a minimal impact on the outcomes of the ordinance, but may open the ordinance to increased legal scrutiny as not all developments are treated equally, unless it can …
August 9, 2022 Planning Commission Question and Answer Report Item 10 Question Thompson: One of the questions I had during our last hearing was about the number of reverse commuters, people who live in Austin but work in a neighboring community. Staff said they didn’t have the answer but would have the data by our next meeting. Staff responded to some of the questions in our last hearing including some of mine, but there response was more about why the data was unnecessary in their thinking. I just wanted to follow up and make sure that staff would have the data before our next meeting. Staff Response: According to the American Community Survey data, there are 73,792 workers living in Austin and working outside of Austin. These workers would be residents of Austin, with access to Austin’s park system and addressed through residential requirements. The number of employees working in Austin (those residing in the city and outside) according to the same survey is 747,394, however, the 73,792 is not part of that sum, since they work outside of Austin. They are counted as residents. The use of other jurisdictions’ park systems by those workers during their workday is not something we can affect. Note that Hutto, for example, also has a commercial parkland dedication requirement.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220809-10 Date: August 9, 2022 Subject: Commercial Parkland Dedication Motioned By: Commissioner Azhar Recommendation Approve Staff’s recommendation related to amendments to Title 25-1 of the City Code to require parkland dedication for commercial developments and include the following amendments: Seconded By: Vice-Chair Hempel • Add parkland dedication / fee exemption for small businesses - need to define size of "small business" - 5,000 SF • PARD staff shall reassess ordinance efficacy on an annual basis, and present findings to PARB and PC, including an annual evaluation and update of the estimated telecommuting rates in the Austin metro area. • Consider allowing partial credit for parkland within the 25-year floodplain if it can be activated safety as determined by the Director. • Explore opportunities to integrate parkland with bus and rail transit stops along transit • corridors. In the case of mixed-use developments, collect the higher fee of the two assessed for residential and commercial uses. • Use a 10-year average to calculate the cost of acquiring parkland in the formula. • The cost or the square footage of public exterior activity amenities provided in commercial projects shall be subtracted from the overall parkland dedication or fee requirement. • Exempt Commercial developments in projects with a Master Development Agreement or a Master Development Agreement in negotiations as of August 1, 2022 for the development of City-Owned property. • Consider adjusting or developing a unique parkland dedication formula for hotels in order • Exempt all income-restricted affordable units from the residential parkland dedication to assess their unique usage. fee. 1 of 2 • Create parkland credit process toward area target ratios based on public realm amenities & publicly accessible privately owned open space, comparable to parkland and related amenities, at a credit percentage determined by PARD staff. Insert, “ 5) art galleries, art workshops, theaters, and live music venues (pending Resolution No. 20220728-094) as defined in Section 25-2-4” Insert , “M) if the applicant agrees to a private Parkland Improvement and Operations Agreement approved by PARD, the amount of parkland owed may be reduced by a minimum of 10% and up to a maximum of 25% at the discretion of the Director based on the estimated value of the approved Agreement” Insert, “Parkland dedication and fee-in-lieu assessment is set at the time of site plan submission and the assessment does not change throughout the development process, unless the project …
Section 11 Neighborhood Park Mueller Commission Presentation August 9, 2022 Location of park in Mueller’s newest neighborhood - Section 11 Google Map view (2022) Site Plan Bird’s-Eye View of Park from Northwest corner looking to Southeast STORAGE WC Pavilion Plan View of Dry Creek, Stacked Stone Wall, Vine Trellis-Covered Terrace and Pavilion View from Vine Trellis-Covered Terrace to Open Lawn Area View of Chennault St Streetscape at Mid-Block Seating Pavilion Color and Materials (Steel of Trellis will be allowed to weather.)
Airport Expansion Development Program Airfield Infrastructure Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) Solicitation No. CLMA046 Airport Expansion Development Program (AEDP)- Major Elements • Meet the air service needs of Central Texas Airfield and Utility Infrastructure 10+ Gate Midfield Concourse Barbara Jordan Terminal Expansion • Meet the needs of airlines serving the airport and region • Maintain excellent passenger experience • Provide flexible expansion for dynamic airline growth 1 Bridge to Light Rail Station Tunnel Expandable for Future Growth Barbara Jordan Terminal New Terminal Curb and Access Road Source: City of Austin Department of Aviation AEDP Anticipated Schedule 2 Bridge, New Curb and Roadway AEDP Anticipated Schedule 3 AEDP Airfield Infrastructure Project Midfield Taxiways The AEDP Airfield Infrastructure Project establishes new Airfield Design Group 5 midfield taxiways to provide increased connectivity between the east and west sides of the airfield and future concourses • Pre-construction services/enabling • Site preparations, building/infrastructure demolition • Airfield utility infrastructure • Taxiway bridges at Emma Browning Ave • Airfield Design Group 5 (ADG V) midfield taxiways AEDP Airfield Infrastructure E R U T U F 4 Source : Evaluation of Mid-Field Taxiway Realignment, KSA 2020 AEDP Airfield Infrastructure Overview Schedule Phase Design Consultant Solicitation [Awarded] CMAR Solicitation CLMA046 Design Phase Permitting / GMP Development Phase Construction Phase Start 1/22 3/22 9/22 1/24 10/24 Finish 8/22 12/22 12/23 9/24 10/26 5 Preconstruction Services • Value engineering • Cost estimating • Construction Scheduling • Phasing Plans • Constructability review • Safety input and review • Estimating • DBE outreach • GMP Development 6 Initial Construction Scope • Establish temporary construction including, office, utilities, haul roads, concrete production center. • Demolish: building structures, abandoned foundations, fencing, roadway, airfield pavement and abandoned utilities within the project limits of construction. 7 Airfield Scope • Prepare subgrade, base materials, • Construct concrete taxiway pavement and asphalt shoulder pavement • Pavement Marking • Construct aircraft rated taxiway bridges over Emma Browning • Construct enhanced security fencing, security checkpoint with access control and utilities • Reconfigure Emma Browning and construct airport service roads 8 Electrical Scope • Install airfield taxiway edge and centerline lighting fixtures and circuits, airfield signage, electrical vault improvements, install new regulators, S1 cut outs, control cabling and update airfield lighting control system • Coordinate with Austin Energy modifications to primary power lines • Modify secondary service to existing locations as needed (ramp lighting, water quality ponds) 9 Utility Scope • Construct …
Austin Airport Advisory Commission Recognition of Stephen Khanoyan WHEREAS, Stephen Khanoyan has served as Division Manager, Airport Affairs at the Austin Bergstrom International Airport since March 2021; WHEREAS, Stephen has supported the Austin Airport Advisory Commission during his tenure; WHEREAS, Stephen has served during especially tumultuous times of the COVID‐ 19 pandemic; WHEREAS, during this time Austin Bergstrom International Airport has relaunched its multibillion dollar Airport Expansion and Development Program and has operated under tremendous lockdown, then growth pressures, and the Airport Commission has increasingly engaged; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Austin Airport Advisory Commission wishes to express its appreciation to Stephen Khanoyan for a job well done and wishes him well in all future endeavors, and, further, that this resolution of Appreciation and Support be duly recorded and spread across the minutes of the Austin Airport Advisory Commission this 9th day of August, 2022. __________/s/_______________ Eugene Sepulveda, Chair _________/s/________________ Wendy Todd Davis, Vice Chair _________/s/________________ Jeremy Hendricks, Secretary
ROBERT MUELLER MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Tuesday, August 9, 2022 The Robert Mueller Municipal Airport Plan Implementation Advisory Commission convened in a regular meeting on August 9, 2022, at the Austin Energy Headquarters located at 4815 Mueller Boulevard Austin, TX 78723. The meeting was also offered via videoconference. Commission Members in Attendance: • Martin Luecke • Kenneth Ronsonette • Kathy Sokolic • Michael Jones, Chair • Rick Krivoniak, Vice-Chair • Corky Hilliard • Christopher Jackson Staff in Attendance: • Susana Carbajal, Economic Development Department • Pam Hefner, EDD • Jill Fagan, EDD • Matthew Schmidt, EDD CALL TO ORDER a. Chair Michael Jones called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL a. Ani Colt addressed the Commission regarding the ONEderment Central concept. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DISCUSSION ITEMS a. Minutes from the June 14, 2022 meeting were approved on Commissioner Sokolic’s motion and Commissioner Ronsonette’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Hyde, Lima, Martin and Neider were absent. a. Presentation by RVi regarding the Zach Scott Greenway: Chris Lalich (RVi) provided updates regarding the design, attributes, amenities, and development timeline for the Zach Scott Greenway. 1 b. Presentation by McCann Adams Studio regarding the Section 11 Park: Jana McCann (McCann Adams Studio) provided updates regarding the design, attributes, amenities, and development timeline for the Section 11 Park. c. Discussion by Catellus regarding Mueller Development updates: Brian Dolezal (Catellus) provided updates on open space development, recent business openings, and upcoming events in the Mueller Development. a. The Commissioners and staff discussed the following list of potential future agenda The Commissioners were asked to provide Chairman Jones with potential future agenda items. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS items: i. UT Lease Update ii. Mueller Development Financial Update iii. MBE/WBE Updates iv. Affordable Housing Update v. Transition of Governance Update vi. Residency Requirements Update ADJOURN The meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m. without objection. 2 The minutes were approved at the September 13, 2022 meeting on Commissioner Sokolic’s motion, Commissioner Hilliard’s second on a 8-0 vote.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, September 13, 2022 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 9, 2022 The COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION convened in a REGULAR meeting on AUGUST 9, 2022, at 1000 E. 11th Street in Austin, Texas. Some members of the commission participated by video conference. Chair Motwani called the Community Development Commission Meeting to order at 6:42 p.m. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance: Amit Motwani, Chair Karen Paup, Vice Chair Jose Noe Elias Kendra Garrett Cindy Jaso Michael Tolliver Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Miriam Garcia Julia Woods PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the Community Development Commission regular meeting on July 12, 2022. The minutes from the meeting of July 12, 2022, were approved on Commissioner Garrett’s motion, Commissioner Elias’ second on a unanimous (8-0) vote. Bertha Delgado, Fisayo Fadelu, Cheryl Thompson, Heidi Sloan, and Eloise Sepeda were absent. 1. 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, September 13, 2022 DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation and discussion on the disposition of Urban Renewal Blocks 16 & 18 from City owned to private (Anne Gatling Haynes, Austin Economic Development Corporation). Anne Gatling Haynes gave the presentation. STAFF BRIEFINGS 3. Briefing on the proposed Fiscal Year 2023 CSBG Budget and Community Action Plan (Angel Zambrano, Manager, Neighborhood Services Unit, Austin Public Health). Angel Zambrano gave the briefing PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the proposed Fiscal Year 2023 CSBG Budget and Community Action Plan, as required by 1) US Department of Health and Human Services, and 2) the Texas Administrative Code, Title 10, Part 1, Chapter 6, Subchapter B, §6.206 (Angel Zambrano, Manager, Neighborhood Services Unit, Austin Public Health). The public hearing was not held, as there were no members of the public present. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Discussion and possible action on the proposed Fiscal Year 2023 CSBG Budget and Community Action Plan (Angel Zambrano, Manager, Neighborhood Services Unit, Austin Public Health). The motion to approve the Fiscal Year 2023 CSBG Budget and Community Action Plan was approved on Commissioner Tolliver’s motion, Vice Chair Paup’s second on a (8-0) vote. DISCUSSION ITEMS 6. Presentation and discussion on the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) (Angel Zambrano, Manager, Neighborhood Services Unit, Austin Public Health). Angel Zambrano gave the presentation. 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, September 13, 2022 DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 7. Discussion and possible action on ATP Community …
AGENDA MEETING MINUTES July 11, 2022 The Board of Adjustment meeting convened on Monday, July 11, 2022. Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Madam Jessica Cohen (Chair) called the Board Meeting to order at 5:39 p.m. Board Members in Attendance (in person): Madam Jessica Cohen (Chair), Brooke Bailey, Ryan Nill, Michael Von Ohlen, Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) Board Members in Attendance (virtually via teleconference): Thomas Ates, Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair), Barbara Mcarthur, Darryl Pruett, Nicholl Wade, Carrie Waller (Alternate) Board Members Absent: Agustina Rodriguez and Richard Smith City Staff in Attendance: Elaine Ramirez (Board Liaison), Erika Lopez (Board Attorney) and Diana Ramirez (Board Secretary) EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM Staff requests approval June 13, 2022 draft minutes A-1 On-Line Link: Item A-1 draft minutes Item-1/1 B. C. Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to approve the minutes for June 13, 2022, Board member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-1-0 votes (Board member Marcel Gutierrez-Garza abstained); APPROVED MINUTES FOR June 13, 2022. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM B-1 Staff and Applicant requests for postponement and withdraw of items posted on this Agenda Requesting postponement/withdrawal by applicant/neighborhood/staff for Items C- 2 AE Denial; Items D-1, E-3 requesting postponement to August 8, 2022 by applicant, Item C-1 requesting withdrawal by applicant. Board member Melissa Hawthorne motions to approve postponement requests (by applicant) for Items D-1 and E-3 and Item C-2 (AE denial) postponement request (by board) to August 8, 2022, Board member Thomas Ates seconds on an 11-0 vote, ITEMS D-1, E-3 and C-2 POSTPONED TO AUGUST 8, 2022 AND C-1 WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT. SIGNS PREVIOUS POSTPONEMENTS C-1 C16-2022-0001 Esteban Arrieta for Eames Gilmore 10107 Research …
AGENDA MEETING MINUTES July 13, 2022 The Board of Adjustment -Special called meeting convened on Wednesday, July 13, 2022. Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Madam Jessica Cohen (Chair) called the Board Meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. Board Members in Attendance (in person): Madam Jessica Cohen (Chair), Brooke Bailey, Ryan Nill, Richard Smith, Michael Von Ohlen, Kelly Blume (Alternate), Marcel Gutierrez- Garza (Alternate) Board Members in Attendance (virtually via teleconference): Thomas Ates, Agustina Rodriguez, Nicholl Wade, Carrie Waller (Alternate) Board Members Absent: Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair) Recused, Barbara Mcarthur, Darryl Pruett City Staff in Attendance: Elaine Ramirez (Board Liaison), Chad Shaw (Board Attorney) and Diana Ramirez (Board Secretary) EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CALL TO ORDER A. INTERPRETATION NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS A-1 C15-2022-0051 Stuart Hersh (Appellant) TDC Griffin Windsor Owner, LLC 5900 Westminster Drive On-Line Link: Item A-1 Item-1/1 The appellant has filed an appeal challenging staff’s interpretation of Chapter 25-2, Subchapter E (Design Standards and Mixed Use) of the Land Development Code in connection with approval of a Site Plan application for construction of a Vertical Mixed-Use (VMU) development at the above-referenced address. The appellant contends that the Site Plan does not meet the Land Development Code, Subchapter E Sections 1.1, 1.5, 2.1, 2.2, 2.8, 3.1, 4.1, and 4.3 in a “GR-V-CO-NP”, Community Commercial-Vertical Mixed Use-Conditional Overlay-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Windsor Park Neighborhood Plan). Note: Subchapter E: Design Standards and Mixed Use, Article 1 – General Provisions, Article 2 – Site Development Standards, Article 3 – Building Design Standards, and Article 4 – Mixed Use: Article 1 – General Provisions 1.1 General Intent 1.5 Alternative Equivalent Compliance Article 2 – Site Development Standards 2.1 Intent 2.2 Relationship of Buildings to Streets and Walkways 2.8 Shade and Shelter Article 3 – Building Design Standards 3.1 Intent 4.1 Intent and 4.3 Vertical Mixed Use Buildings Article 4 – Mixed …
M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Council DATE: January 14, 2022 FROM: Denise Lucas, Director, Development Services Department SUBJECT: Update on Resolution No. 20211014-045 – Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program On October 14, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 20211014-045 directing the City Manager to explore the creation of a Board of Adjustment Applicant Assistance Program (BAAP) for residential homestead applicants who are requesting a hardship variance or special exception. The resolution contemplates the creation of a BAAP fund to support fee waivers or reductions for applicants who meet the eligibility criteria; as well as pro bono assistance with navigating the application process and subsequent proceedings. To meet the requirements outlined in this resolution, staff is working with the Financial Services Department to identify a funding source. In addition, staff is working with the procurement office to develop a process to procure pro-bono legal services. Staff does not anticipate completing all the components of the Council direction until May 2022 at which time a full response will be provided. Should you have questions or need additional information, please contact Doron Silberstein, Equity and Inclusion Program Manager, at doron.silberstein@austintexas.gov or (512) 978-1732. cc: Spencer Cronk, City Manager Rodney Gonzales, Assistant City Manager Item-10/1
§ 2-1-111 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. (A) The Board of Adjustment is established as provided in Local Government Code Chapter 211 (Municipal Zoning Authority). (B) The board shall be composed of 11 members. (C) Each board member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (D) The council may appoint alternate board members to serve in the absence of regular members. An alternate member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (E) A regular or alternate board member may be removed by council for cause on a written charge after a public hearing. (F) The board shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) board. hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and perform other duties prescribed by ordinance or state law. (G) The board shall hold meetings at the call of the chairperson and at other times as requested by the (H) The chairperson, or the acting chairperson in the absence of the chairperson, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. (I) Each case before the board must be heard by at least 75 percent of the board members. (J) The concurring vote of 75 percent of the board members is necessary to: reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official; decide in favor of an applicant on a matter on which the board is required to pass under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); or (3) authorize a variation from the terms of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning). (K) The board shall prepare minutes of its proceedings. The minutes shall include the vote of each member on each item before the board and shall state if a member is absent or fails to vote on an item. Source: Ord. 20071129-011; Ord. 20080110-048; Ord. 20080618-030; Ord. 20110526-098;Ord. No. 20141211-204, Pt. 14, 7-1-15. Item-11/1 ARTICLE 3. - PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS Division 1. - Reserved.[2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45. - RESERVED. Division 2. - Appeals. § 2-5-61 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR APPEALS. Editor's note— Ord. No. 20170518-014 >, Pt. 4, effective May 29, 2017, repealed §§ …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-2 DATE: July 11, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2022-0004 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Ryan Nill _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez OUT _______Richard Smith OUT _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) N/A _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Apple Tree Holdings LLC-Tony Nguyen ADDRESS: 4507 IH 35 SVRD NB VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-123 (Expressway Corridor Sign District Regulations): (B) (2) (b) (i) to exceed sign area of 107 square feet (maximum allowed) to 200 square a) feet (requested) and (B) (3) (a) to exceed sign height of 35 feet (maximum allowed) to 50 feet (requested) in b) order to provide signage for a multi-tenant professional office in a “LO-NP”, Limited Office- Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Upper Boggy Creek Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-123 Expressway Corridor Sign Regulations (B) This subsection prescribes regulations for freestanding signs. (1) One freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Additional freestanding signs may be permitted under Section 25-10-131 (Additional Freestanding Signs Permitted). (2) The sign area may not exceed: (a)on a lot with not more than 86 linear feet of street frontage, 60 square feet; or (b) on a lot width more than 86 linear feet of street frontage, the lesser of: (i) 0.7 square feet for each linear foot of street frontage; or (ii) 300 square feet. Item-3/1 (B) This subsection prescribes regulations for freestanding signs. (3)The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (a) 35 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (b) 20 feet above grade at the base of the sign. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JUNE 13, 2022 POSTPONED TO JULY 11, 2022 (AE DENIAL); JULY 11, 2022 POSTPONED TO AUGUST 8, 2022 BY BOARD (AE DENIAL) FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed …
