All documents

RSS feed for this page

Music CommissionJuly 11, 2022

Play video original link

Play video

Scraped at: Sept. 15, 2022, 4:10 p.m.
Music CommissionJuly 11, 2022

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 7 pages

F INANCIAL S ERVICES D EPARTMENT C ENTRAL P ROCUREMENT Purchasing Organizational Chart Morbi leo risus, porta ac consectetur ac, vestibulum at eros. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Morbi leo risus, porta ac consectetur ac, vestibulum at eros. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Morbi leo risus, porta ac consectetur ac, vestibulum at eros. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Procurement Cycle (Est. # of Days) Invitation for Bids Request for Proposals Request for Qualifications PROCUREMENT Method Pre-Solicitation Source Selection Post-Solicitation Total 30 45 50 40 90 50 PROCUREMENT PHASE 125 180 40 105 50 195 Factors Affecting Contract Execution • Incomplete solicitation documents • Changes to the solicitation timeline • Vendor protests • Vendor delays in submitting the required information • Contract negotiations Ways departments can help the solicitation move more quickly • Prioritize all solicitation requests • Ensure solicitation documentation are complete • Evaluation panel members are committed • Minimize any changes during the solicitation process Live Music Fund Event Program – 3rd Party Administrator Solicitation Schedule Projected Date Actual Date Job Function Submit Solicitation to Purchasing Office for Review (Enter requisition in Advantage and solicitation request in eCapris) 7/6/2022 7/8/22 Purchasing Office Submits Goal Determination to SMBR 6/29/2022 7/10/2022 7/13/2022 7/25/2022 7/29/2022 8/1/2022 8/1/2022 8/16/2022 8/19/2022 8/19/2022 9/1/2022 9/8/2022 9/9/2022 9/12/2022 9/15/2022 9/16/2022 11/3/2022 11/10/2023 e r a p e r P n o i t a t i c i l o S / n o i t a t i c i l o S e u s s I & n o i t a u l a v E n o i t a i t o g e N S S E C O R P A C R ) d r a w A & l a v o r p p A ( Submit COE for Professional Services Receive Approved Goal Determination Form from SMBR Pre-Offer Conference (This will require early outreach) Solicitation Published Deadline for Vendor Q&A Final Addendum Solicitation Closing/ Offers Due Evaluate Offers …

Scraped at: Sept. 15, 2022, 4:10 p.m.
Music CommissionJuly 11, 2022

Backup original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 16 pages

Implementing inclusive and equitable public development services as a non-profit partner to the City of Austin Cultural Trust Update Austin Economic Development Corporation 11 July 2022 – Music Commission AEDC BOARD & TEAM Standing Committees Executive • • Governance Finance • • Strategic Planning • Real Estate Project Committees: • Cultural Trust Advisory Committee • Urban Renewal Board Partnership Working Group • + future projects Overview • Cultural Trust program administration was identified by City Council in our June 2021 Interlocal Agreement, Addenda 4 & 5 • Structure of Request for Proposals developed based on type of funds Theater Culture available, as well as based on input from 2020 RFI, and 2019-20 joint working group recommendations Dance • This is a unique and new process—it is not a grant program, it is a real Music estate investment program. • The process has provided great insight into the needs of the New, No Location culture/music/arts ecosystem, and that data will be communicated to help inform future resources/funding. Real estate/space is just one aspect to what supports an organization to thrive. Visual Arts Austin EDC Cultural Trust | 3 Cultural Trust Funds Available 12 M Creative Spaces Bond Fund • Acquisition & Development • Publicly accessible 2.4 M HOT Iconic Venue • Acquisition, development, and means necessary to secure the space • Requires ‘Tourism’ function • May require ‘Historic Zoning’ to provide property tax relief 2.5 M COA Budget – Iconic Venue • 15 M total over many years • More flexible than HOT funds Additional funds to leverage public funds: Loans-traditional • Loans-CDFI • • Social impact investments • Grants • CDBG funds [AHFC/LITC] • [NMTc] • Austin EDC Cultural Trust | 4 Efforts To Date Request for Proposal: Nov 2021-March 2022 Website program page-updated weekly Office Hours ▪ Approximately 30+ hours Learning Hours/Open Sessions ▪ 9 Presentations & Videos ▪ 225 Views of Videos Direct Outreach and Reminders ▪ Group emails (500+ distribution) ▪ Newsletter inclusion ▪ Commission Announcements ▪ Direct emails (recruiting) ▪ Word of mouth Cultural Trust - RFP Evaluation Criteria Existing Venue 70% Business Capacity: Financial Capacity Operating Capacity Respondent Experience/Mgmt Team Site Control Clustering/Visibility 30% Policy Alignment: Diversity Equity & Inclusion Community Impact New Venue 35% Business Capacity: Financial Capacity Operating Capacity Clustering/Visibility 65% Policy Alignment: Diversity Equity & Inclusion Community Impact Austin EDC Cultural Trust | 6 This Process Program alignment Feasible deal structure-legal projects …

Scraped at: Sept. 15, 2022, 4:10 p.m.
LGBTQ Quality of Life Advisory CommissionJuly 11, 2022

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

LGBTQ QUALITY OF LIFE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JULY 11th, 2022 REGULAR MEETING of the LGBTQ QUALITY OF LIFE ADVISORY COMMISSION MONDAY, JULY 11, 2022 7:00 P.M. City of Austin Permitting and Development Center, Room 1401 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, Texas 78752 MEETING MINUTES Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Jeremy Garza, the Commission’s staff liaison, at 512-978-1797 or jeremy.garza@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Ryn Gonzales, Chair + + Kanoa Arteaga Emily Bush + + Charles Curry + Rebecca Dreke - Dr. Victor Martinez Christian Vieira + Melissa Taylor, Vice Chair - Marti Bier + Kannou Curette - Nan Dowling - Katelyn Jones + Darcy Rendon - Brandon Wollerson + AGENDA CALL TO ORDER By chair Ryn Gonzalez at 7:03pm. ROLL CALL: Absent: ● Victor Martinez ● Melissa Taylor ● Kannou Curette ● Nan Dowling ● Darcy Rendon ● Ryn Gonzalez ● Kanoa Arteaga ● Emily Bush Present: LGBTQ QUALITY OF LIFE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JULY 11th, 2022 ● Charles Curry ● Rebecca Dreke ● Christian Vieira ● Marti Bier ● Katelyn Jones ● Brandon Wollerson PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. • Community Advance Network (CAN) Carlos Soto o CAN Flyer – Posted online as backup & emailed to Commissioners o CAN aims to leverage mutual resources to increase social and economic opportunities in Austin. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Approve the minutes of the COMMISSION’S REGULAR MEETING on June 13, 2022. a. Motion to approve June 2022 regular meeting minutes by Charles Curry. Seconded by Christian Vieira. All in favor; None opposed; Motion passes unanimously. Staff briefing regarding Austin’s first comprehensive food plan pursuant to Austin City Council Resolution No. 20210610-039. The food plan will cover issues from food production, distribution, retail, consumption, food access, and food recovery and waste. Presented by Edwin Marty, Food Policy Manager, Office of Sustainability; Emmie DiCicco, Food Policy Intern, Office …

Scraped at: Sept. 22, 2022, 3:50 a.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

Preview List original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for July 6, 2022 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register for remote participation: • Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Tuesday, July 5, 2022 (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). • Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. • Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. • Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. • The live broadcast meeting may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch- atxn-live Historic zoning applications 813 Park Lane – Owner-initiated historic zoning 1122 Colorado Street – Owner-initiated historic zoning 2002 Scenic Drive – Commission-initiated historic zoning Historic landmark and historic district applications 4402 Speedway – Hyde Park Local Historic District – Addition/remodel, demolish detached garage, & new construction of ADU (postponed June 1, 2022) 1100 E. 8th Street – Lindemann House – Window repair and replacement (postponed June 1, 2022) 6301 Bluff Springs Road – Sebron Sneed House – New construction 1802 Lavaca Street – McDonald-McGowan House – Demolish rear brick wall 1119 E. 11th Street – Thomas Family Home – Renovation A.1. A.2. A.3. B.1. B.2. B.3. B.4. B.5. B.6. B.7. B.8. C.1. C.2. C.3. C.4. C.5. C.6. C.7. C.8. C.9. 1108 W. 9th Street – Brass-Goddard House – Addition/remodel 3909 Avenue G – Hildreth-Flanagan-Heierman House – Pool 510 Baylor Street – Raymond-Morley House – Addition/remodel and rehabilitation National Register …

Scraped at: June 24, 2022, 10:20 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 6, 2022

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Regular Meeting of the Environmental Commission July 6, 2022 at 6:00 P.M. Permitting and Development Center, Events Center, Room 1405 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, Texas 78752 Some members of the Environmental Commission will be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register to speak remotely, call or email the Kaela Champlin, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 974-3443, Kaela.Champlin@austintexas.gov, no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Haris Qureshi Rachel Scott Pam Thompson Melinda Schiera Audrey Barrett Bixler CALL TO ORDER Colin Nickells Jennifer Bristol, Secretary Kevin Ramberg, Chair Ana Aguirre Richard Brimer Perry Bedford, Vice-Chair AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND ACTION 1. Approval the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 15, 2022. (5 minutes) 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS Name: Bull Creek PUD Amendment #3, Case No. C814-2009-0139.03 Applicant: David Armbrust, Armbrust & Brown Location: 5305, 5400, 5404, 5408, 5505, Paradox Cove; 4909, 4915-1/2, 4929 FM 2222 Road Council District: District 10 Staff: Leslie Lilly, Environmental Program Coordinator, Watershed Protection Department Watershed: Bull Creek Watershed, Water Supply Suburban, Drinking Water Protection Zone Requests: To amend a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended with conditions (1 hour) Name: Mercedes Benz South Austin, SP-2021-0127C Applicant: Gemsong Ryan Location: 10900 S IH 35, Austin, Texas 78748 Council District: District 5 Staff: Tunde Daramola, Environmental Review Specialist Senior, Development Services Department Watershed: Onion Creek, Suburban Watershed, Desired Development Zone Requests: Request to vary from LDC 25-8-261 to allow a private driveway access point to the site through a Critical Water Quality Zone Buffer Staff Recommendation: Recommended with conditions (30 minutes) Urban Forestry Committee – Richard Brimer (Committee …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 12:10 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 6, 2022

20220706-002: C814-09-0139.03 Bull Creek PUD Amendment Zoning Packet 1 of 2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 80 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET Amendment #3 DISTRICT: 10 CASE: C814-2009-0139.03 – Bull Creek PUD ZONING FROM: PUD ADDRESS: 5305, 5400, 5404, 5408, 5505 Paradox Cove; 4909, 4915-1/2, 4929 FM 2222 Road SITE AREA: 54.70 acres PROPERTY OWNER: David G. Booth, Trustee for the David Booth Revocable Trust AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (David Armbrust) TO: PUD, to change conditions of zoning CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment to planned unit development (PUD) district zoning as outlined in the redlined draft PUD amendment ordinance, and as shown in Exhibit C – the revised Land Use Plan, and supporting Exhibits F, J, K, N, and O. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, please see pages 2 - 6. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION ACTION: July 6, 2022: May 4, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY THE STAFF [P. BEDFORD; R. SCOTT – 2ND] (10-0) P. THOMPSON – ABSENT ZONING AND PLATTING COMMISSION ACTION: July 19, 2022: June 21, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO JULY 19, 2022, BY CONSENT May 17, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO JUNE 21, 2022, BY CONSENT [B. GREENBERG; C. THOMPSON – 2ND] (7-0) C. ACOSTA – OFF THE DAIS; J. KIOLOBASSA, H. SMITH, R. WOODY – ABSENT [H. SMITH; J. KIOLBASSA – 2ND] (11-0) April 19, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO MAY 17, 2022, BY CONSENT [J. KIOLBASSA; A. DENKLER – 2ND] (11-0) C814-2009-0139.03 Page 2 March 1, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO APRIL 19, 2022 [H. SMITH; A. DENKLER – 2ND] (9-0) S. BOONE; R. WOODY – ABSENT January 18, 2022: APPROVED A POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF TO MARCH 1, 2022 [H. SMITH; C. ACOSTA – 2ND] (10-0) R. WOODY – OFF THE DAIS [H. SMITH; D. KING – 2ND] (10-0) ONE VACANCY ON THE DAIS August 4, 2020: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF CITY COUNCIL ACTION: To be scheduled ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The Applicant has discussed the proposed PUD amendment with Courtyard Homeowners Association, Cat Mountain Homeowners Association, North West Austin Civic Association, and 2222 Coalition of Neighborhood Associations (CONA). Correspondence from neighborhood groups is attached at the back of this report. The Applicant is in agreement with the Staff recommendation. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS TO THE STAFF REPORT: Exhibits A and A-1: Zoning Map and Aerial Exhibit B: Applicant’s Summary Letter; Redlined, …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 12:10 p.m.
Environmental CommissionJuly 6, 2022

20220706-002: C814-09-0139.03 Bull Creek PUD Amendment Zoning Packet 2 of 2 original pdf

Backup

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 12:10 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

Meeting Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting Wednesday, July 6, 2022, 6:00 PM Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation (Tuesday, July 5th by noon). To speak remotely at the Historic Landmark Commission Meeting, members of the public must:  Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, Tuesday, July 5th (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting).  Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call.  Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak.  Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak.  Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting.  If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commission FECHA de la reunion (6 de julio, 2022) Se permitirán comentarios públicos en persona o de forma remota por teléfono. Se requiere registro a más tardar al mediodía del día anterior a la reunión para la participación remota. (Domingo 1 de junio al mediodía). Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben:  Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar ).  Una vez que se haya realizado una solicitud para hablar con el enlace de la junta, la información para llamar …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.1.0 - 813 Park Blvd - Miller-Long original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: July 6, 2022 PC DATE: TBD CASE NUMBER: C14H-2022-0078 ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 813 Park Boulevard APPLICANT: O’Connell Architecture, LLC HISTORIC NAME: Miller-Long House WATERSHED: Waller Creek ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-CO-NP to SF-3-CO-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence (SF-3) – conditional overlay (CO) – neighborhood plan (NP) to family residence (SF-3) – conditional overlay (CO) – neighborhood plan (NP) – historic landmark (H) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: N/A PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ACTION: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee), Central Austin Community Development Corporation, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Hancock Neighborhood Assn., Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, North Austin Neighborhood Alliance, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2021 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek historic resource survey recommends the property as eligible for local landmark designation, a contributing resource to a potential local historic district, individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and contributing to a potential National Register Historic District. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The Miller-Long House demonstrates significance in the categories of Architecture as a beautiful example of the Tudor Revival style popular from 1890-1940 and specific to the Perry Estate Addition, developed by D.W English in 1928. The home’s massing and detailing are representative of the Tudor Revival style, with a steeply pitched frontfacing gable with wing, a smaller gable nested within the larger one, shed dormers, arched detailing, and distinctive patterned brickwork. The material pallet of variegated brick, stucco, steel casement windows and Tudor-styled entry doors. The original roof was wood shingles but is now composition shingle. The interior paneling and woodwork are intact as other interior features, including Tudor arches over interior doorways, built-in cabinetry, a brick fireplace with a Tudor arch and a decorative surround embellished with a floral and drape relief. The asymmetrical design of the front façade is typical of the style after 1920. A detached garage is located just southwest of the main house and dates to the same period of construction as the main house. The garage matches the house in form, roof pitch and wall materials, and consequently …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.1.1 - 813 Park Blvd - Miller-Long - HZ application original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 55 pages

City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet F. 1: Historical Documentation - Deed Chronology Deed Research for (fill in address) ________________________________ List Deeds chronologically, beginning with earliest transaction first and proceeding through present ownership. The first transaction listed should date at least back to when the original builder of any historic structures on the site first acquired the property (i.e., should pre-date the construction of any buildings/structures on the site). Please use the format delineated below. For each transaction please include: name of Grantor/Grantee, date of transaction, legal description involved, price, and volume/page number of deed records. If there is a mechanic's lien please copy the entire document. Plat Records Volume 435, Page 353B Volume 442, Page 369A Online Deed Record CNY0080108CNY CNY0076603CNY Grantor Date Executed 4/23/1929 10/11/1929 10/21/1946 Instrument Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Warranty Deed 1/13/1947 Warranty Deed E. H. Perry R. Tom Miller Nellie May Miller and husband, Tom Miller Rex D. Kitchens and wife, Effie Kitchens Mrs. J.M. Hooper Jay H. Brown Mrs. J.M. Hooper W.L. "Jack" Armstrong Stuart Long and wife, Emma Long John C. Buckley Austin Doctors Bldg Corp Stuart and Emma Long Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Warranty Deed Release of Lien 4/14/1947 4/14/1947 7/28/1948 11/2/1950 11/1/1971 11/1/1971 10/17/1974 10/21/1974 5/24/1977 UCC-1 NON STD OPR Austin Doctors Bldg Corp 10/26/2017 Special Warranty Deed Laverne Henderson (deceased); Marvin Grantee R. Tom Miller Nellie May Miller Rex. D. Kitchens Mrs. J.M. Hooper Jay H. Brown Mrs. J.M. Hooper W.L. "Jack" Armstrong Stuart Long and wife, Emma Long John C. Buckley Austin Doctors Bldg Corp Marvin and Laverne Henderson John C. Buckley Travelers Insurance Co 811-813 Park LLC Volume 825, Page 56 Volume 827, Page 424 Volume 846, Page 436 Volume 846, Page 437 Volume 933, Page 387 Volume 1065, Page 633 Volume 4211, Page 1685 Vol. 4228, Page 2357 Vol. 5031, Page 1477 Volume 5052, Page 1854 Volume 5782, Page 2173 Floyd Henderson; Mayrene Henderson; Pattye Henderson and Johnn Robert Henderson 3/6/2020 Deed 811-813 Park LLC Xinesi Holdings LLC 505201854 582302392 503101477 505201854 578202173 2017172429 2020038245 10 Adopted December 2012 813 Park Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751 City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet F. 2: Historical Documentation - Occupancy History Occupancy Research for (fill in address) ___________________________ Using City Directories available at the Austin History Center or other information available, please …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.1.2 - 813 Park Blvd - Miller-Long - photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 18 pages

Current Photographs All photos by O’Connell Architecture staff, March 2020 – August 2021 Photo 0001 Main House - North elevation Camera facing southwest Photos – Page 1 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0002 Main House - South elevation Camera facing north Photos – Page 2 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0003 Main House - West elevation Camera facing east Photos – Page 3 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0004 Main House - West elevation Camera facing east Photos – Page 4 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0005 Garage - North elevation Camera facing south Photos – Page 5 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0006 Garage - South elevation Camera facing north Photos – Page 6 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0007 Garage - East elevation Camera facing west Photos – Page 7 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0008 Garage - West elevation Camera facing east Photos – Page 8 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0009 Main House – Interior foyer and staircase Camera facing southwest Photos – Page 9 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 10 Main House – Second floor landing and railing Camera facing northeast Photos – Page 10 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 11 Main House – Interior doors with tudor arches Camera facing northwest Photos – Page 11 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 12 Main House – Front Door and Screen Camera facing east Photos – Page 12 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 13 Main House – Living Room Fireplace Camera facing east Photos – Page 13 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 14 Main House – Dining Room Camera facing north Photos – Page 14 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 0015 Main House and Garage Camera facing southeast Photos – Page 15 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photo 16 Rock Entrances at west end of Perry Estates Addition between Barrow Street and Waller Creek Bridge Camera facing west Photo 17-18 Rock Entrances at west end of Perry Estates Addition between Barrow Street and Waller Creek Bridge Camera facing southwest and northwest respectively Photos – Page 16 Miller-Long House 813 Park Blvd. Photos 19 Rock Entrances at east end of Perry Estates Addition at the corner of Park Blvd. and Red River Street Camera facing southwest Photos 20 Rock Entrances at east end of Perry Estates Addition at the corner of Park Blvd. and …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.2.0 - 1122 Colorado St - Westgate Tower original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: July 6, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C14H-2022-0073 PC DATE: ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1122 Colorado Street APPLICANT: Brian Evans, Westgate Condominium Association HISTORIC NAME: Westgate Tower WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake ZONING CHANGE: CBD to CBD-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from Central Business District (CBD) zoning to Central Business District – Historic Landmark (CBD-H) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations: The Westgate Tower is an excellent example of New Formalism, is the only building in Austin designed by architect Edward Durell Stone, and has served as a model for mixed-use building.1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: 2012 – recommend historic zoning (5-0; Leary/Wolfenden-Guidry). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 974-2727 ACTION: N/A ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets,Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central Austin CommunityDevelopment Corporation, City of Austin Downtown Commission,Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn.(DANA), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless NeighborhoodAssociation, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, PreservationAustin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2010. Land Development Code §25-2-352(A)(3)(a) states that City Council may designate a historic landmark if it retains integrity, is over 50 years old, and is individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The Historic Landmark Commission recommended historic zoning in 2012; however, the application was withdrawn by the applicant prior to Planning Commission hearing. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: §25-2-352(A)(3)(a) The property is individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places; or is designated as a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, State Archeological Landmark, or National Historic Landmark. The building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2010. §25-2-352(A)(3)(b)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.2.1 - 1122 Colorado - Westgate Tower - HZ application original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 120 pages

One Texas Center | 505 Barton Springs Road, Austin, TX 78704 | 512.978-4000 Property Profile Report Capitol Dominance Overlay Capitol View Corridors: BARTON CREEK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ZILKER CLUBHOUSE, MOPAC BRIDGE - SDCC, BARTON CREEK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE - SDCC, WOOLRIDGE PARK, MOPAC BRIDGE Downtown Austin Plan Districts: Uptown / Capital Downtown Density Bonus: FAR - 15 | Max Hgt - 400 Green Building Mandatory: Central Business District/Downtown Mixed Use Residential Design Standards: LDC/25-2-Subchapter F Selected Sign Ordinances Zoning Map Zoning Guide The Guide to Zoning provides a quick explanation of the above Zoning codes, however, the Development Assistance Center provides general zoning assistance and can advise you on the type of development allowed on a property. Visit Zoning for the description of each Base Zoning District. For official verification of the zoning of a property, please order a Zoning Verification Letter. General information on the Neighborhood Planning Areas is available from Neighborhood Planning. Current Imagery General Information Location: Parcel ID: Grid: 1122 COLORADO ST 0208011906 MJ23 Planning & Zoning *Right click hyperlinks to open in a new window. Future Land Use (FLUM): No Future Land Use Map Regulating Plan: No Regulating Plan Zoning: CBD Zoning Cases: C14H-2012-0078 Zoning Ordinances: None: Zoning Overlays: Infill Options: Neighborhood Restricted Parking Areas: -- -- -- -- Mobile Food Vendors: Historic Landmark: Urban Roadways: Yes No No No No No No Environmental Fully Developed Floodplain: FEMA Floodplain: Watershed Boudaries: Creek Buffers: Austin Watershed Regulation Areas: URBAN Lady Bird Lake Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone: Edwards Aquifer Recharge Verification Zone: Erosion Hazard Zone Review Buffer: Political Boundaries Jurisdiction: AUSTIN FULL PURPOSE Council District: 9 County: TRAVIS School District: Austin ISD Community Registry: Vicinity Map Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central Austin Community Development Corporation, City of Austin Downtown Commission, Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group The Information on this report has been produced by the City of Austin as a working document and is not warranted for any other use. No warranty is made by the City regarding its accuracy or completeness. Date created: 3/28/2022 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service ^) ^ NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Registration Form Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY HISTORIC NAME: Westgate T …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.2.2 - 1122 Colorado St - Westgate Tower - withdrawn app_2012 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 120 pages

A.4 - 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: PC DATE: September 24, 2012 CASE NUMBER: C14H-2012-0089 APPLICANT: Westgate Condominium Association HISTORIC NAME: The Westgate Tower WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1122 Colorado Street ZONING FROM: CBD to CBD-H SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from Central Business District (CBD) zoning to Central Business District – Historic Landmark (CBD-H) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: The Westgate Tower is an excellent example of the New Formalism approach to modern architecture, is the only building in Austin designed by internationally-known architect Edward Durell Stone, and has served as a model for continued mixed-use growth in the city, combining residential, commercial, and social uses in the same building. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The building is not listed in the Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey (1984) because of its age. ACTION: PHONE: 974-6454 ORDINANCE NUMBER: CITY COUNCIL DATE: ORDINANCE READINGS: 1ST 2ND 3RD CASE MANAGER: Steve Sadowsky NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION: Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The Westgate Tower was designed by internationally-known New York architect Edward Durell Stone in 1962; the building was completed under the supervision of prominent local architects Fehr and Granger in 1966. It is an excellent example of the New Formalism in the modern movement of architecture in the 1960s, as espoused by Stone, who was known throughout the world for his high-rise buildings that combined verticality with the monumental scale, refinement, and ornamentation of Classical building styles. The Westgate, named for its location just west of the State Capitol grounds, also served Stone’s philosophy of building up-scale residential buildings in park-like settings in or near downtown areas, luring wealthy residents away from single-family houses in the suburbs. Stone was concerned that most high-rise architecture of the era was sole solution to A.4 - 2 overdevelopment where going up was the only way to develop a site that was otherwise overbuilt already. The location of the Westgate Tower provided Stone the opportunity to express the ideals of downtown living with a green setting. The Westgate was also innovative in several other ways, providing a model for future central city development – combining residential and commercial uses, and a necessary amenity in the modern era – an integral parking garage that formed a significant part of the entire composition rather than as an auxiliary, utilitarian structure. …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:50 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.3.0 - 2002 Scenic Dr - zoning change review sheet original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 25 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: July 6, 2022 CASE NUMBER: TBD PC DATE: ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 2002 Scenic Drive APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Delisle House WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence – neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) zoning to family residence – historic landmark – neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. Should the Commission decide against recommendation over owner objection, require completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package prior to permit release. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture, landscape features, and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: TBD PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL DATE: ORDINANCE READINGS: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 974-2727 ACTION: ORDINANCE NUMBER: NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Barton Creek Assn., Save Historic Muny District, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources, Tarrytown Alliance, Tarrytown Neighborhood Association, West Austin Neighborhood Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: A valid petition against historic zoning has been filed by the owner’s agent. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: §25-2-352(A)(3)(b)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. A property located within a local historic district is ineligible to be nominated for landmark designation under the criterion for architecture, unless it possesses exceptional significance or is representative of a separate period of significance. The primary building is a good example of Spanish eclectic architecture with Modern-style Fehr and Granger influences. The accessory structure is a unique example of eclectic, mid-century, and Gothic Revival architecture; it features unique Mansbendel keystones throughout. It appears to convey architectural significance as a one-of-a-kind structure in Austin. The primary building at 2002 Scenic Drive, known historically as River Street or River Avenue, …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:51 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.3.1 - 2002 Scenic Dr - engineer report_Redacted original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Page 1 of 2 Engineer’s Report SUBJECT: Assessment of structural conditions 2002 Scenic Drive, Austin, Texas JOB NUMBER: DATE OF REPORT: 21206.01 June 20, 2022 At the request of Ryan Street Architects, I have visited the site twice to review existing conditions of structural elements and to offer an opinion about the suitability for reuse in a renovation. This report is a summary of my observations and refers to photos in the June 21, 2022 report by Ryan Street Architects. Apartment The degradation of the roof and windows has allowed water into the building for an unknown but obviously prolonged period of time. The wood roof framing has obvious rot in areas exposed by holes, and I believe it is likely that further investigation will reveal that none of the roof framing is salvageable. Given the excessive deflection of the roof (photo on page 12) and the concerns about the floor joists mentioned below, I caution against entering this building until the roof and floor can be adequately shored. The existing floor joists are supported in slots gouged into the face of the exposed limestone cut (photo 1, page 16), which was leaching water (photo 3, page 16) during my visits despite no antecedent rainfall. The ends of the joists are spliced onto the original joists as part of a previous repair which was undoubtedly caused by previous similar rot. The splices are not adequate and show clear signs of deflection and distress. The repair ends are now showing signs of rot. These structural connections are inadequate and dangerous. The stone wall on the second floor is supported on an inverted steel railroad rail, which is not properly supported at points of bearing or against rotation. The elevated concrete slab over the garage also appears to use steel railroad rails as reinforcement, and the steel shows severe corrosion. Again, I recommend caution under and on this slab until in can be properly shored. The walls are load-bearing, uncoursed random rubble masonry that do not meet the minimum requirements of modern or recent building codes for thickness and for height-to-thickness ratios. These walls cannot be reused as load-bearing in the renovation. Two Story House The exterior walls are load-bearing, uncoursed random rubble masonry, similar in construction and deficiencies to the apartment. These walls cannot be reused as load-bearing in the renovation. Additionally, the reuse of the existing masonry walls as non-load-bearing …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:51 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.3.2 - 2002 Scenic Dr - applicant photos original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:51 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

A.3.3 - 2002 Scenic Dr - conditions report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 35 pages

2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E , E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S | J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 3 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Site Diagram A p a r t m e n t J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 5 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Site Diagram 1. 2. APARTMENT EXTERIOR 1. ROOF DAMAGE INDICATED BY DISPLACED, DAMAGAGED AND MISSING SHINGLES. HOLES IN THE ROOF POINT TO BROAD WATER DAMAGE WITHIN AND POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO STRUCTURE. 2. WOOD WINDOWS - JAMBS, SILLS, AND FRAME ARE ROTTED. BROKEN PANES THROUGHOUT. J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 6 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Apartment - Exterior 1. 2. APARTMENT EXTERIOR 1. METAL IS RUSTED AND VINES ARE ENTERING INTO APARTMENT. 2. WOOD WINDOWS - JAMBS, SILLS, AND FRAME ARE ROTTED. BROKEN PANES THROUGHOUT. VINES ARE OVERGROWN AND ARE ENTERING INTO THE INTERIOR. J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 7 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Apartment - Exterior 1. 2. APARTMENT EXTERIOR 1. THE ROOF IS FALLING APART AND IS SHOWING SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE. 2. THE ROOF IS SLANTING, WHICH IS A SIGN OF STRUCTURAL FAILURE AND MATERIAL DETERIORATION. J U N E 2 8 , 2 0 2 2 8 2 0 0 2 S C E N I C D R I V E R E S I D E N C E Apartment - Exterior …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:51 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionJuly 6, 2022

B.1.0 - 4402 Speedway original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-064555 HYDE PARK 4402 SPEEDWAY B.1 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an addition. Replace windows and doors. Demolish detached garage and replace with new accessory dwelling unit. Add a deck and porch. Replace roof with metal roof. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct an addition to existing house. Construct a deck at the north elevation and screened porch at the west elevation. The proposed addition is clad in horizontal siding and is capped with a standing-seam metal roof. 2) Demolish detached garage and construct new accessory dwelling unit. ARCHITECTURE One-story Craftsman bungalow with exposed rafter tails, triangular brackets at eaves, partial-width gabled porch, and horizontal wood siding. DESIGN STANDARDS The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2: Retention of Historic Style: Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project mostly retains the primary building’s scale, though it removes historic features from primary elevations. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism: Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. When developing plans for additions, porches, and other exterior alterations, look to other houses of similar vintage to see how these changes were made historically, and then use that information as a guide to developing an appropriate size, scale, and massing for your proposed exterior change. The proposed project does not include alterations without historical basis; however, the proposed alterations to the main elevation do not appear to have historical precedents. 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing Structures: 1. Preserve the historic fabric: Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. 2. Reconstruct missing or un-repairable architectural features with the following: a) Recycled historic materials that approximate the size and match the scale, profile, and appearance of the deteriorated or missing feature, if available. b) New material that that approximates the size and matches the scale, profile, and appearance of the historic material. Reconstruct or rebuild missing architectural features using photographic or physical indications as a guide. The proposed project preserves some historic fabric, but significantly alters the building’s façade. …

Scraped at: July 1, 2022, 1:51 p.m.