From: To: Subject: Date: Nick Fritz Ramirez, Elaine C15-2022-0002 Friday, September 02, 2022 9:52:22 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Elaine, hope your weekend went well. im reaching out again b/c i got a notification via letter about them trying to build a condominium… again across the street from my house. Case Number: C15-2022-0002 a) i, nicholas fritz am against Marek Hnizda / Guadalupe Heights LLC (Lacman Patil) trying to increase the height Limit from two stories and 30 feet(maximum allowed) to 3 stories in 30 feet(requested) for a building location 50 feet or less from property in and SF–5 or more restricted zoning district. b) i, nicholas fritz am against Marek Hnizda / Guadalupe Heights LLC (Lacman Patil) trying toIncrease height limitations to increase the highest limits from three stories and 40 feet(maximum allowed) to 4 stories and 40 feet (requested) and “SECTION 25-2-1064 (Front Setback): c) i, nicholas fritz am against Marek Hnizda / Guadalupe Heights LLC (Lacman Patil) trying to decrease the front setback from 25 feet (minimum required) to 15 feet (requested) on a tract that adjoins property in an SF–5 or more restricted zoning district and fronts on the same street in order to erect a Multi-Family building in a “MF-4-CO”, Multi–Family Residence Moderate- High Density–Conditional Overlay Zoning district. again, don’t want a condominium across the street from my house nor do i or anyone around me think it’s a good idea for the neighborhood. The area of the condominium is going to be built is already a high traffic area and will cause great deals of traffic with construction and without construction. Don’t forget about the kids that live around the area as well making an unsafe environment for more cars speeding around the corner. please let me know if you have any questions nick CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. From: To: Subject: Date: Mark Foohey Ramirez, Elaine Case Number: C15-2022-0002 Monday, September 05, 2022 12:55:13 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Ramirez, I am writing in regards to case number C15-2022-0002 regarding a proposed zoning change to be heard by the Board of Adjustment on 9/12/22. I own a property within …
North Loop Neighborhood Association Board of Adjustment 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, TX 78701 Subject: North Loop Neighborhood Association and proposed development at 5413 Guadalupe To the Members of the Board of Adjustments this afternoon, the 9th of September 2022. My name is Brian Bedrosian and I am currently serving as the Vice President of the North Loop Neighborhood Association (NLNA), a post I have held since 2019. I am writing this letter on behalf of the NLNA to provide some insight into the neighborhood’s past positions on projects such as that being proposed by Webber Studio and their clients that might help to inform how the NA would vote once we are able to properly consider the project. Marek Hnizda reached out to me regarding this project and we met over Zoom to discuss the proposed variance to the setback along Guadalupe along with their proposed project and what it might look like. We were not able to bring this in front of the neighbors for a formal vote prior to your meeting on the evening of the 12th of this month – so my comments here are simply an idea of our values and how we have responded to similar proposals. In general, our neighbors have tended to vote in favor of projects that show a considered investment in quality housing within our neighborhood with a focus on affordability, family-oriented units where possible, sustainability and increased density. Our neighborhood plan has sought to support a more urban feel to our neighborhood that aspires to provide space for a more diverse and inclusive community of people in the rapidly heated market that Austin finds itself in. With this in mind, the project per the current proposal is within the parameters of something we might support. As you may recall we were recently in front of the Board in support of a much larger VMU project at 201 East Koenig Lane at the southeast corner of Koenig and Avenue F. That particular developer worked closely with our neighborhood and PARD to create a project that served the needs of the developer, the aspirations of the neighborhood and the mission set forth by PARD’s Parkland Dedication Ordinance. We strongly encourage Webber Studio and their clients to continue to engage our neighborhood throughout the design process to seek a similarly mutually beneficial design. While I am unable to provide an official neighborhood …
PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK " 0 - ' 5 1 25'-0" 25'-0" BUILDABLE AREA A= 13,803 sq ft K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I I E N L Y T R E P O R P I E N L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S T N O R F G N N O Z E S A B I K C A B T E S T N O R F Y T I L I B T A P M O C I 15'-0" PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK 25'-0" K C A B T E S R A E R Y T L B T A P M O C I I I I E N L Y T R E P O R P 2 5'- 0 " 1 5'- 0 " BUILDABLE AREA A= 10,354 sq ft COMPATIBILITY REAR SETBACK 2 5'- 0 " PROPERTY LINE E P O R P E K C A B T E T S N O R Y F K C A B RTY LIN T E T S N O R G F NIN O E Z S A B PATIBILIT M O C K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I I E N L Y T R E P O R P T E E R T S E P U L A D A U G 3 1 4 5 1 5 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A P L D G 1220 Lavaca Street Thursday, September 8, 2022 SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 SIDE SETBACK 25'-0" PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 PROPERTY AREA = 27,873 SF PROPERTY AREA = 27,873 SF TYPICAL MF-4 PROPERTY SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1 5413 GUADALUPE ST SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 2 N A01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS: COMPATIBILITY DIAGRAMS
Our property is brown in this image. We received signatures of support from 6 nearby neighbors at 5 properties. Those in support are highlighted in green. The house on Texas Ave was originally concerned and asked for a postponement at a previous HOA meeting, but is now in support. The neighbor directly behind the property is still not in support and prefers the property to be subdivided so that both lots front on 38th street (which would not allow the existing house to be saved).
P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t Quality Management Division To: Alyssa Tharrett Project Manager Parks & Recreation Department, City of Austin Re: Zilker Botanical Garden 2220 Barton Springs Rd, Austin, TX 78746 Existing Roof Over Greene Room Ms. Tharrett, September 14, 2021 This letter is in regard to the structural integrity of the existing roof over Greene Room at the Zilker Botanical Garden. A site visit was conducted on September 3, 2021, to perform a structural observation of the existing roof. The existing roof over the Greene Room is wood framed structure, there are four (4) primary Glulam beams which support wood rafters with a 2x wood deck. Glulam members are built up beams that are laminated between each member which bonds the 2x members together achieving a strong structural member. If the laminates are not properly bonded the structural integrity of the member has been compromised. The exterior section of the Glulam beams have experienced structural damage due to weathering and wood erosion. See photos A, B, C, D and E. Beam 1 has lost a large section of beams cross-sectional area at the cantilever end that has reduces the structural sectional property of the beam which has affect the structural capacity of the member. This member has failed and needs to be addressed prior to any additional member loss. The fascia has been damaged and must be addressed. See photo B. Beam 2 shows signs of erosion, the extent of the damage is not clear at this time. The cross-sectional property at the cantilever end of the member has been compromised and must be addressed prior to any additional damage. See photo C. Beam 3 has experienced weathering and the cross-sectional property has been compromised at the cantilever end of the member. See photos D and E. Beam 4 appears to have been repaired, the extent of the repair is unknow and repair documents have not been reviewed. The repair material does not match the original wood member sizes of the Glulam and does not appear to be laminated. The existing Glulam members have been compromised, creating imminent hazard and danger to the health, safety and welfare of the public. The existing wood roof needs to be addressed immediately to minimize any further damage. The room can be used at this time, continuous …
VICINTY MAP ENFIELD C A P O M 9TH ST 900 BLANCO 6TH ST O C N A L B R A M A L PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE PROPERTY AT 900 BLANCO CONTAINS FOUR DWELLING UNITS, THREE OF WHICH ARE CURRENTLY OCCUPIED. ALL THREE BUILDINGS ARE CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES TO THE CASTLE HILL LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT. THIS PROPOSAL ADDS 819.65 SQUARE FEET (REF. PROPOSED F.A.R. CALCULATIONS TABLE ON SE1.2) OF FLOOR AREA TO UNIT A, AND COMBINES UNITS A AND C INTO ONE DWELLING UNIT. ALL NEW FOOTPRINT AND CONSTRUCTION IS LIMITED TO THE COMPATIBILITY SETBACKS IMPOSED BY THE ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THE PROPOSED LIMITS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ARE LIMITED TO 2237.19 SQUARE FEET. ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES ARE EXISTING, AND WILL NOT BE MODIFIED AS PART OF THIS PROPOSAL. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 40% OF 50X190 FT OLT 4 DIVISION Z ZONING MF-4-HD-NP RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (MCMANSION) ADU APPROXIMATE AREA REDUCED PARKING COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS CASTLE HILL LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT OLD WEST AUSTIN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN GENERAL PROJECT NOTES PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF AUSTIN CODES, REGULATIONS & ORDINANCES DO NOT SCALE DRAWING, CONTACT ARCHITECT UPON DISCOVERY OF MISSING INFORMATION OR CONFLICTS IN DRAWINGS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FOR ALL PARTS OF THIS PROJECT TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS MECH, ELEC, PLUMB & FIRE ENGINEERING TO BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. MAY REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH ARCHITECT VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START FLOOD PLAIN & WATERSHED INFO WATERSHED: URBAN 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN: NO FIRE PROTECTION THIS PROJECT EXCEEDS 3,600 SF UNDER ONE ROOF, AND THEREFORE IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FULL NFPA 13D SPRINKLER SYSTEM BY OTHERS TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL LEVELS PENDING RESULTS OF NEAREST HYDRANT FLOW TEST SHEET LIST NO. SHEET NAME H1.1.2 H1.1.3 H1.1.4 SE0.0 SE1.0 SE1.1 SE1.1.2 SE1.2 SE1.3 SHEET TOTAL: 9 KILDAY PORCH Shingles BLANCO PORCH COVER SHEET SITE PLAN TREE PROTECTION PLAN TREE 63 PHOTOS EXISTING / PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER ORIGINAL SURVEY NOT FOR PERMIT, CONSTRUCTION, OR REGULATORY APPROVAL Drawn by Checked by TJR 3 0 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A , t e e r t S o c n a B 0 0 9 l O C N A L B & H T 9 austinarchitect.com 512.796.4001 Date: Issue: Revision: 08.29.2022 SITE PLAN EXEMPTION SET 1 REV 1 - 08.23.22 H0.0 COVER SHEET 1 OF …
ELEC POLE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE ELEC PNL CLASSRM 5 / SCHOOL ADMIN MAIN PRE-SCHOOL SECURE GATE CASA MONTESSORI PRE-SCHOOL ELEC POLE OHE ELEC PNL ELEC POLE OHE CLASSRM 2 CUT EAVE BACK AS REQ'D @ CLASS-RM CLASSRM 1 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES I C H P A R G 4 1 / 3 1 SECURE GATE 'SYMMETRY' ELEV CONFIG: SGL-OPENING CAB SIZE: 48x54 W: 68" / D: 72" RAIL CTR-LINE: 40.75" DR CTR-LINE: 42.5" I 4 1 / 3 1 C H P A R G STORAGE RM NEW ELEV- ATOR VEST HVAC COND 1 HVAC COND 2 HVAC COND 3 HVAC COND 4 MEN WOMEN MECH STOR CLST 15 16 17 STAIR HALL D T F A H S 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ENTRY HALL SECURE GATE DARKER SHADED-AREA DENOTES EXTENT OF NEW ELEVATOR SHAFT & ROOF CONSTRUCTION SECURE GATE I 9 C H P A R G GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES GRAPHIC 12 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES ELEC PNL H2O IN FR STREET UP 7 EQ RI UP 4 EQ RI NORTH MEETING UP 4 EQ RI CARETAKER APT UP 4 EQ RI CARETAKER COURT CLASSRM 4 CLASSRM 3 WEST LOUNGE EAST LOUNGE OFFICE ENTRANCE GAS MTR CARETAKER ENTRANCE GAS IN FR STREET KITCHEN EAST RESTRM EAST ENTRY FOUNTAIN NORTH PARKING 48" DIA OAK AM LGN POST 76 SIGN T S A T N A L T A VEHICLE ENTRANCE FOSTER AVE GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES G R A P H I C 5 H2O MTR G R A P H I C 8 MISC STOR CVD DANCE FLR UNCVD PATIO STONE WALK CVD SOUTH PATIO AM LGN HALL ENTRANCE I 7 C H P A R G GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES MAIN ENTRANCE GRAPHIC 6 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES K L A W E N O T S AMERICAN LEGION HALL / CHARLES JOHNSON HOUSE UNCVD LAWN G R A P H I C 3 / 4 GRAPHIC NOTE: SEE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR ALL GRAPHIC PHOTOS & NOTES 44" DIA OAK 48" DIA OAK UNCVD LAWN 48" DIA OAK SOUTH PARKING 90" DIA …
PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION Copyright: These drawings are property of the architect and may not be reproduced, distributed, published, or used in any way without written consent of the architect. l a z a P a m a P 8 1 6 1 l 3 0 7 8 7 X T , n i t s u A l , a z a P a m a P 8 1 6 1 l Design Development August 5, 2022 Drawn by: CC, XH Checked by: CC Revisions: Existing Site Photos Existing Site View from Palma Plaza, south corner of site looking northwest Existing Site View from Palma Plaza, east corner of site looking northwest G1.03 PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMIT, OR CONSTRUCTION Copyright: These drawings are property of the architect and may not be reproduced, distributed, published, or used in any way without written consent of the architect. l a z a P a m a P 8 1 6 1 l 3 0 7 8 7 X T , n i t s u A l , a z a P a m a P 8 1 6 1 l Design Development August 5, 2022 Drawn by: CC, XH Checked by: CC Revisions: Project Rendering G1.04 559' Unit C Proposed Gas & Elec. meters UP DN 558.75 UNIT C 555.58 " 3 ' - 0 2 Egress well & steps 556.58 558.90 1 8 ' - 0 " (2) Parking Spaces in Private Garage Unit B Proposed Gas & Elec. meters Unit B Proposed HVAC 1 3 . 0 A / 2 1021 550 Unit C Proposed HVAC 50% CRZ Unit A Proposed Gas & Elec. meters Building overhangs 50% CRZ above Unit A Proposed HVAC 2 / A 3 . 0 2 1022 5 5 8 ' UNIT B 556.83 2 0 ' - 9 " UNIT A 554.08 554.00 (2) Parking Spaces in Private Garage 554.00 " 8 ' - 0 1 553.87 5 5 5' DN Gate 5 5 6' See G1.11 for continued Accessible Route UP 5 5 7 ' 1 3 . 0 A / 1 a z a l m a P l a P 5 5 7 ' Proposed Detention Pond 5 5 6 ' 1030 1028 1027 1029 1024 1025 1026 1023 1 / A 3 . 0 2 1018 Retaining wall " 2 / …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item 3 DATE: September 12, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2022-0005 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Agustina Rodriguez (out) ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jaden Rodriguez OWNER: Leo Garcia ADDRESS: 7712 ELROY RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-130 (Commercial Sign District Regulations) (G) (1) from sign height of 30 feet above frontage street pavement grade (maximum allowed) to 40 feet (requested) above frontage street pavement grade in order to provide signage for The Circuit of the Americas in a “PUD”, Planned Unit Development zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-130 Commercial Sign District Regulations. (A) This section applies to a commercial sign district. (B) One Freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Additional freestanding signs may be permitted under Section 25-10-131 (Additional Freestanding Signs Permitted). (G) The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (1) 30 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (2) 6 feet above grade at the base of the sign. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Melissa Hawthorne motions to postpone to October 10, 2022; Board member Michael Von Ohlen second on 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 10, 2022. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item 4 DATE: Monday September 12, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0065 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Agustina Rodriguez (out) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Daniel Strinden ADDRESS: 1700 LORETO DR VARIANCE REQUESTED The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 15 feet (requested) in order to erect a detached Two-Family residential unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (MLK Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC 25-2-515 Rear Yard of Through Lot for a Through Lot, a rear yard must comply with the minimum requirements applicable to a front yard. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Approve; Madam Chair Jessica Cohen second; Board member Michael Von Ohlen withdraws the motion to Approve and motions to Postpone to November 14, 2022, Board member Brooke Bailey second on 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 14, 2022. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
