https://arcg.is/0z48bj0 Trash In Creeks: A field survey of trash intensity and source types in Austin, Texas RR-22-01, August 2022 Andrew Clamann, Mateo Scoggins, James Collins, Jeremy Walker City of Austin, Watershed Protection Department. 505 Barton Springs Road, Austin, Texas 78704. (andrew.clamann@austintexas.gov, mateo.scoggins@austintexas.gov, james.collins2@austintexas.gov, jeremy.walker@austintexas.gov) Abstract The Watershed Protection Department conducted a field survey to understand distribution and sources of trash in creeks to inform solutions. Data points were collected every 30ft for a total of 19,467 observations in 110 miles along 20 creeks from November 2021 to April 2022. Results show that trash intensity does not correlate well with stream position (upstream-to-downstream) which implies that trash does not move evenly through the system, complicating efforts to quantify the relative impact of different sources. Presence of trash is more strongly influenced by stream roughness (primarily riparian vegetation) than by source inputs which presents an opportunity to use these natural “strainers” as locations to periodically remove trash from the system. ArcGIS attributes and linear regression, at the raw data level and aggregated, were used to evaluate relationships between trash intensity and observed point sources such as overflowing dumpsters, illegal dumping, historic dumping, encampments, as well as land attributes such as population, transportation, and land use (e.g., single family residential, multifamily, commercial, parks, etc.). Surprisingly, there were no strong relationships with any of the sources or watershed attributes. This indicates that culpability of trash in creeks should not be directed specifically at any one source, but rather it is the cumulative influence of the Austin community. Spatial analysis indicates that 76% of the total volume of trash was located at only 10% of the observation points. The most encountered items were single use plastic beverage and food containers resonating a global appeal for reduction. A companion report “Trash in Creeks: Benchmarking Solution Space” (RR-22-02) provides recommendations synthesizing the data from this field survey in the context of international strategies to prevent and abate trash in waterways. Introduction Purpose Due in part to public comment asserting an increase of trash in creeks over time, prevalence of scooters thrown in waterbodies and concerns with encampments, the City Council passed Resolution No. 20200123- 108 (CIUR 2234) directing the City Manager “to prepare a study with recommendations to improve the ecological health and safety of Austin’s rivers, lakes, and creeks by addressing litter problems, prevention, and abatement in our watershed.” The resolution further specified a list of …
Trash in Creeks Field Investigation Report and Benchmark Research Study Andrew Clamann ZWQC 11//09/22 Andrew.Clamann@austintexas.gov Mateo.Scoggins@austintexas.gov Leila.Gosselink@austintexas.gov Resolution No. 20200123-108 (CIUR 2234) field study benchmark report upstream concentration source downstream concentration Typical pollutant assessment: downstream – upstream = source contribution This assessment does not work for trash Variability in storm intensity Variability in stream character Data Collection • 20 Creeks • 110 miles • Observations every 30ft • 19,467 data points Scooters only 21 found Small number of occurrence due to: o reduced permitted fleets (since 2020) o improved process for reporting (311) o efficient process for removal (vendor) Trash intensity score + source presence • Overflowing dumpster • Outfall/tributary • Encampment • Dumping historic site • Dumping point source • Dumping unknown • Property management Sources by occurrence Takeaway # 1 Encampment was the most commonly-observed source, but is similar in intensity and range to most other sources Result: A georeferenced map of intensity* and sources example: upper shoal creek *can be used by internal or external partners for strategic cleaning https://arcg.is/0z48bj0 Takeaway # 2 Trash intensity is not proportional to its drainage area (source input locations are deceiving) Geospatial analysis using 300’ and 3000’ buffers Population Transportation Land Use Takeaway # 3 There were no statistically significant correlations between trash intensity and: landuse, census, transportation, • • • • parks, etc. Takeaway # 4 Virtually anything can be found in creeks, but single use plastics were the most common item clothing, tents, bedding recreation items, toys erosion matting, silt fences packaging, shipping office, household lawn tools, mulch bags, garden hoses, appliances medical, electronics, textiles, hardware traffic cones, barriers, safety construction materials, asphalt, lumber Telecommunication cables, displaced infrastructure 500+ shopping carts Takeaway # 5 76% of the trash is found in 10% of the area (opportunity for strategic site selection for cleanups by COA, partners, contractors, volunteers) Field report provides diverse assemblage of recommendations at different scales • • • • • • • site-specific cleanups, improved rules for dumpsters, structural controls, enforcement, education/outreach, coordination with partners, etc Benchmarking Research Report • EXTRACTION (physically removing trash from waterways) ex: structural controls, machines, manual labor • INTERCEPTION (keeping trash from entering waterways) ex: education, enforcement, landscape cleanups, structural controls • SOURCE REDUCTION (stemming the flow into our community) ex: limit single use plastics Extraction • creek and lake cleanups* • requirement/enforcement of vendors/individuals to clean up • targeted cleanups at …
FY22 Year In Review November 2022 Recycling Plan Submission Rate 85% Organics Plan Submission Rate 70% Recycling • • FY22 85% plan submission rate rebounded from pandemic levels (in the 80% range) Recycling plan submission rate in the eastern crescent was 84.47%, the rest of Austin 87.21% Organics • The 70% organic plans submission rate represents the highest rate in program history • Organic plan submission rate in the eastern crescent was 67.33%, the rest of Austin 73.07% Compliance • Approximately 10K properties and 5K food permit holders are affected by the ordinance • Property owner response to a deficiency letter increased by 15% with the new Code Compliance team • Identifying and contacting mobile food vendors continues to be a challenge Brick and Mortar Submission Rate 75% Mobile Food Vendor Submission Rate 28% 66% of businesses who submit recycling plans reported not meeting all ordinance requirements. 90% met dumpster size and placement requirements (but were missing other items such as signs or education) • Learn more about the ordinance at: austintexas.gov/uro Department Administrative or Operational Action related to the ordinance • New software build for public facing online recycling and organic plans • New software database build to support online submissions • New software database and case filing system for compliance • Implement 3-1-1 call in-process for public ordinance questions • Implement strategies to reduce the 25% of organic submissions reporting source reduction and no food donation or composting • Proactive outreach to properties that reported no education and signage Active Potential Policy Revisions to the ordinance • Austin Travis County Food Policy Board - Working Group - food donation • ZWAC - URO Committee City Council resolution discussion related to multifamily composting Austin Travis County Food Policy Board: austintexas.gov/content/austin-travis-county-food-policy-board 11 businesses received $18k in rebates in FY22 6 organizations purchased five refrigerators/freezers to expand food rescue 3 businesses switched from single use plastic or foam to reusable or compostable items 2 businesses started composting services Learn more at: austintexas.gov/zwbizrebate
Equitable Transit-Oriented Development ETOD Policy Plan Early Childhood Council meeting - November 2022 Purpose of the Plan Provide a comprehensive framework to help the Austin community ensure that future development around the Project Connect transit system supports residents of all incomes and backgrounds, especially those who have been disproportionately burdened by past transportation and land use decisions. ETOD Resolution 20210610-093 • Prioritization of equitable outcomes • Categorization of TODs by tiers using context-sensitive criteria • Anti-displacement strategies • Preservation of existing and creation of affordable housing • Creation of market-rate housing • Compact, connected and transit-supportive • Mix of land uses • Codify community benefits What is ETOD? TOD vs. Equitable TOD Why we are going from this.... To this! 4 The ETOD Team 5 Austin’s ETOD Journey Corridor Bond, ASMP, and Project Connect ETOD Study ETOD POLICY PLAN REGULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION Established corridors of Establishes protypes for TOD Recommendations for focus, mode split goals, that reflect Austin’s vision to planning prioritization, and procured funding for equitably share the benefits typologies, policy tools, high-capacity transit of transit investments for and next steps to project delivery. residents of all income levels, implement ETOD in Austin. and backgrounds. WE ARE HERE Adopt ETOD station area plans and code amendments that may include updates to zoning. Could be expanded to other geographies in the future. 2016 - 2020 2021 - 2022 2022 - 2023 2023 - onward 6 ETOD Study • $1.65 million in Federal Transit Administration (FTA) TOD planning grants • Around 100 stations across all Project Connect lines 1 2 Quantitative analysis of existing conditions within ½ mile of station areas Qualitative data collection through robust community engagement 7 Dashboard – Existing Conditions Dashboard Home Page Multifamily Inventory Total Jobs by Industry Station Tour Interactive Data : • Population • Displacement Risk • Jobs • Urban Fabric • Real Estate • Mobility s c i m a n y D s c i t s i r e t c a r a h c l a i c o S l a c i s y h P 8 8 Engagement Touchpoints Community Presentation Large format meetings to present project milestones CAC Working Group Briefings Monthly meetings, Ongoing guidance throughout project and major milestones Tabling/Intercept Surveys In-person events to target specific neighborhoods or demographics Focus Groups & One-on-ones Guided discussions with groups to identify vision and needs and to build …
Early Childhood Quality of Life Work Group Community Member Job Description & Commitment The City of Austin Early Childhood Council (ECC) is working with the City of Austin to conduct a Quality of Life Study (QoLS) for families with young children. We are forming a work group composed of members of the Early Childhood Council and members of the community to co- create, plan and oversee the study. We want a group for the initial phase of this process, which includes caregivers of young children and community members. We would like to extend an invitation to support this work with your expertise and lived experiences. Community Member Commitment: If you join the group, we would like you to contribute by - Participating in QoLS work-group planning meetings twice a month. - Help define the most important elements of quality of life to ask about - Help assure that the questions and methods are appropriate for various communities - Contribute to recruiting strategies for participation in the study - Amplify the materials we create in your circles of influence within the community - Attend at least one of three town halls to get community input to the study. Our Commitment to you: For your participation in the work group, - You will be a full partner in the work group. - We will ensure our work-group space is one of community, safety, collaboration, growth, and trust. - You will receive compensation for your contributions to our work group. These payments ___________________________ (describe how much & how they will be paid - goal through CIG partners for parents). - We will offer opportunities for training in community leadership. How do I join a work group? Please take a look at the calendar of events below. If you believe you can attend most of the working group meetings, and most other calendared events, fill out this form. You’ll hear back from the ECC QoLS Team around the next steps. If you have any questions or thoughts, you can contact Nicole Cummings-Lewis directly: Nicole.Cummings@uwatx.org, through text or call at 512.590.2296 Calendar of Events: The time frame for this work is November 2022 to March 2023. Event Date/Time Event Thursday, Oct 17 from 12:00pm - 1:00pm Working group meeting Monday, Nov 28 from 1:00pm - 2:00pm Working group meeting Tuesday, Dec 6 from 2:00pm - 3:00pm Working group meeting Wednesday, Dec 7 from 12:00pm - …
Item 18 # 22-3562 Water & Wastewater Commission: November 9, 2022 Council: December 1, 2022 Posting Language Recommend approval for an additional contingency for the construction contract with Pepper Lawson Waterworks, LLC for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation project in the amount of $252,180 for a total amount not to exceed $28,047,021. (District 1). MBE/WBE This contract was awarded in compliance with Chapter 2-9A of the City Code (Minority Owned and Women Business Enterprise Procurement Program). Current participation to date is 23.73% MBE and 1.37% WBE. Lead Department Financial Services Department Client Department Austin Water Assistant Director of Engineering Services, Shay Ralls Roalson Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water Purchasing Language Original contract was awarded through a competitive Invitation for Bid solicitation process. Prior Council Action June 14, 2018 - Council awarded additional contingency for the construction contract with Pepper- Lawson Waterworks, LLC for the Walnut Creek WWTP Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation project January 26, 2017 - Council awarded a construction contract with Pepper Lawson Waterworks, LLC for the Walnut Creek WWTP Tertiary Filter Rehabilitation project Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action November 9, 2022 - To be reviewed by the Water & Wastewater Commission Additional Backup Information The Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) receives wastewater flow from Austin Water's wastewater collection system. The plant was originally built in 1977. Over the years, the treatment plant has undergone numerous improvements and upgrades to modernize treatment methods as well as to expand treatment capacity to 75 million gallons per day (MGD) with a two2- hour peak flow of 165 MGD. Treated plant effluent is discharged into the Colorado River. A portion of the treated effluent is used for non-potable water (NPW) on the plant site and supplies much of the City’s Reclaimed Water program. The tertiary filters at the Walnut Creek WWTP serve as the final step in the wastewater treatment process. Construction of this project began in March 2017 and is substantially complete. Due to unforeseen conditions associated with rehabilitating an existing facility, change orders to date have Item 18 # 22-3562 Water & Wastewater Commission: November 9, 2022 Council: December 1, 2022 exhausted all available contingency. Additional contingency of approximately 1% of the contract amount is requested due to the unanticipated need to replace certain valves and controls in the filter piping gallery to improve the reliability of the …
Construction Contracting Update Shay Ralls Roalson, PE | November 9, 2022 Recent Bidding Results Wild Horse WWTP Expansion Bid Analysis Agenda Upcoming Bids Large Facilities IDIQ Alternative Delivery 1 Construction Contracts City of Austin Bidding Process Outreach events to communicate upcoming projects Four- to six-week advertisement Adjust bid dates to avoid “competing with ourselves” • Coordination with SAWS and Houston Non-mandatory pre-bids, where possible For single bid contracts, move forward if • Contractor meets qualifications • Project cannot be rescoped 3 • For projects with low pre-bid attendance, contact bidders and consider extending solicitation Construction Contracts Engineers’ Opinions of Probable Construction Cost Developed on the basis of vendor quotes, installation factors, and recent bids Prepared at preliminary engineering and design milestones (30%, 60%, 90%) Updated at 100% and at advertisement Contingencies represent “work not included elsewhere” • Reduce as design detail increases Difficult to adjust to rapidly changing bid climates Review high bids and single bids • Make recommendation whether to proceed 4 AW Project Bids May 2021 – Sept 2022 34 bid openings, including 3 re-bids 25 projects with multiple bids 5 projects with one bid • 3 rejected 4 projects with no bids 5 Multiple Bids Single Bid No Bid 10 8 6 4 2 0 y c n e u q e r F 0 1 3 Number of Bids Received per Contract 4 5 2 6 Low Bids vs Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) 30 project bids received • 12 below OPCC • 18 above OPCC 5 single bids • 2 accepted • 3 rejected All accepted bids combined • OPCC = $319M • Accepted bids = $319M 1 Single bids accepted Single bids rejected Single Bids Rejected Path Forward Davis WTP Raw Water Hydraulic and Energy Efficiency Improvements • Single bid, 2.4x OPCC • Repackage and bid with other upcoming work at the WTP SAR WWTP Elevated Tank Rehabilitation and Improvements • Single bid, 2.2x OPCC • Split into two projects, one for site work and one for tank recoating East Parke Subdivision Phase 1 Lift Station (Development Project SER) • Single bid, 2.0x OPCC • Non-compliant bid, preparing to re-bid 7 No-Bid Projects Re-Bid Results Project OPCC Low Bid Re-bid Outcome Zilker Water and Wastewater Pipeline …
Item 6 # 22-3475 Water &Wastewater Commission: November 9, 2022 Council: December 8, 2022 Posting Language Recommend approval to negotiate and execute an amendment to the professional services agreement with CDM Smith, Inc., for additional construction phase engineering services for the North Austin Reservoir and Pump Station Improvements project in the amount of $797,079 for a total contract amount not to exceed $8,171,176. (District 7) MBE/WBE This amendment will be awarded in compliance with City Code 2-9B (Minority Owned and Women Owned Business Enterprise Procurement Program). Current participation to date is 18.38% MBE and 30.41% WBE. Lead Department Financial Services Department Client Department Austin Water Assistant Director of Engineering Services, Shay Ralls Roalson Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Capital Budget of Austin Water. Purchasing Language Original contract was awarded through a qualifications-based selection process. A complete solicitation package, including a tabulation of the bids received, is available for viewing, is available for viewing on the City’s Financial Services, website, Austin Finance Online. Link: Solicitation Document. Prior Council Action May 23, 2013 - Council approved a professional services agreement with CDM Smith, Inc. June 23, 2016 - Council approved an amendment to the professional services agreement with CDM Smith, Inc. March 12, 2020 - Consent Agenda approved unanimously, 10-0 with CM Harper-Madison off the dais April 23, 2020 - Council approved an amendment to the professional services agreement with CDM Smith, Inc. for construction phase services Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action November 9, 2022 - To be reviewed by the Water & Wastewater Commission May 8, 2013 - Unanimously approved by the Water and Wastewater Commission on a 7-0 vote June 8, 2016 - Recommended by the Water and Wastewater Commission on a vote of 8-0 with Commissioner’s Kellough, Ho, and Fishbeck Maia absent Item 6 # 22-3475 Water &Wastewater Commission: November 9, 2022 Council: December 8, 2022 Additional Backup Information Originally constructed in 1913, the North Austin Reservoir located at 5802 North Lamar Blvd. is one of the oldest water facilities in Austin’s water distribution system. Over the years, the existing 10 million-gallon (MG) reservoir, the on-site pump station, and the booster pump station located across Koenig Ln. have undergone several renovations, including construction and overhaul of the pumping facilities. However, the reservoir, pump station, and booster pump station have exceeded their useful lives and require replacement. The construction contract to replace the North Austin Reservoir and …
Fleet Software Enhancement Project Transitioning to New Software Zero Waste Advisory Commission 9 November 2022 Director Ken Snipes Background • In 2017, the process began to update the 17-year-old fleet software system. • After the integration, testing continued to advance the software. Since the integration, staff identified new needs that were outside of the scope of the current software contract. Staff created manual processes to close the gaps. Software Features Staff identified some issues, and the new needs of the department necessitated features outside of the original scope. These include: • Connectivity problems which cause system performance issues Inability to install software updates to all computers at once Inability to record collection activities on both sides of a street Limited video storage and reporting capabilities • • • New Software Solutions The current contract ends in 2023. Staff is exploring new software technologies. Potential software solutions should provide: • Optimized routing solutions • Unified software updates based on departmental requests • Customized reporting using telematics • Large capacity storage • Recording of all collections (both sides of the street) • Asset management • Compatibility with existing systems and equipment Questions
REGULAR MEETING o f t h e A I R P O R T A D V I S O R Y C O M M I S S I O N ( A A C ) NOVEMBER 8, 2022 3:00 PM 2800 SPIRIT OF TEXAS DRIVE AIRPORT CAREER AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER GRAND CANYON CONFERENCE ROOM AUSTIN, TEXAS 78719 Some members of the Commission may be participating via videoconference. Live audio of the meeting will be available as an alternative to attending in person. Please email Ammie Calderon at ammie.calderon@flyaustin.com by Noon of the day of the meeting for dial-in details. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than Noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email Ammie Calderon at ammie.calderon@flyaustin.com. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS Eugene Sepulveda, Chair Wendy Price Todd, Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks, Secretary Scott Madole CALL TO ORDER Ernest Saulmon Jonathan Coon Billy Owens Bakari Brock Vicky Sepulveda Chad Ennis Raymond Young AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Please see further instructions on registration above. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the AAC regular meeting on October 11, 2022. 1 STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. September 2022 Financial Results presented by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief Finance Officer. 3. Air Service Update presented by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development. 4. Airport data related to the operations during the Formula One Race weekend presented by Jacqueline Yaft, Chief Executive Officer. Journey with AUS (AUS Capital Improvement Program) presented by Somer Shindler, Chief Development Officer. 5. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Review actions of City Council at the October 27, 2022 meeting. • Approve a resolution finding the use of the Construction Manager at Risk method of contracting, as authorized by Subchapter F, Chapter 2269 of the Texas Government Code, is the project delivery method that provides the best value to the City for the Barbara Jordan Terminal Optimization – Phase 2 project. Item 10. [Approved on Consent] 7. Discussion regarding Airport ASQ Survey Results presented by Ghizlane Badawi, Chief Operations …
AUSTIN INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE PLANNING COMMUNITY TASK FORCE November 8th, 2022 --12:00pm Hybrid Special-Called Meeting Austin Permitting and Development Center Room 1405 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the BOARD/COMMISSION may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live For more information go to: Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. The first 10 speakers to register will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns not on the agenda. To register, contact Jaynell Nicholson at jaynell.nicholson@austintexas.gov. The information required is the speaker’s name, item number(s) they wish to speak on if applicable, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). CURRENT TASK FORCE MEMBERS: Voting Members: Bill Moriarty Hani Michel Perry Lorenz Sarah Faust Todd Bartee Robert Mace, Vice Chair Ex Officio Non-Voting Members: Austin Water: Kevin Critendon Austin Energy: Kathleen Garrett Austin Resource Recovery: Tony Davee Neighborhood Housing and Community Development: Tymon Khamsi Office of Innovation: Daniel Culotta Office of Sustainability: Lucia Athens Parks and Recreation: Liana Kallivoka Watershed Protection: Katie Coyne Vanessa Puig-Williams Jennifer Walker, Chair AGENDA CALL TO ORDER – PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the meeting minutes from the Regular Task Force meeting on September 20, DISCUSSION ITEMS 2022 staff 1. Update on water supply conditions, presented by Austin Water staff 2. Presentation of Water Forward 2018 implementation progress, presented by Austin Water • Water Forward 2018 Q4 Progress Report • Upcoming Milestones 3. Decentralized Reclaimed Planning Update, presented by Austin Water staff 4. Update on Water Forward 2024 project status, presented by Austin Water staff • Task Progress to Date and Upcoming Milestones • Overview of Scenario Planning Approach VOTING ITEMS 1. Proposed 2023 Meeting Dates FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days …
Legend GO: General Office LO: Limited Office SF-2: Single-Family Residence - Standard Lot GO-MU: General Office - Mixed Use GR: Community Commercial CH: Commercial Highway GO MF-2: Multi-Family Residence - Low Density CS: General Commercial Services CS-1: General Commercial Services - Liquor Store CS-V: Commercial Services - Vertical Mixed Use GO CS-1-V-CO: Commercial Services - Vertical Mixed Use Conditional Overlay LO-CO: Limited Office - Conditional Overlay MF-2 GR-V-CO: Community Commercial - Vertical Mixed Use - Conditional Overlay GR-MU-CO: Community Commercial - Mixed Use - Conditional Overlay UNZ - Unzoned SF-2 SF-2 GO-MU LO R E F F U 0 ’ B 0 5 SF-2 LO CS BARTON CREEK GREENBELT MF-4 L O O P 3 6 0 MF-2 UNZ CS-1-V-CO CS-1 GR GR CS U S S T O P O E T R R A PID B GR-V A PIT A L M E T R O M C CS-V D R A V E L U O R B A CS-1-V-CO M A S . L CS CH GO GR Legend: Property Boundary 500’ Buffer Existing Buildings Zoning Districts MF-2 SF-2 GR GR-MU-CO GR-V-CO GR MF-2 SF-3 SF-5 SF-3 GR SF-6 SF-3 CS-1-V CS CS MF-2 LO-CO SF-6 0 200 400 800 EXHIBIT B: BRODIE CONTEXT MAP SUBMITTAL DATE: 10/27/2022 PUD CASE: C814-2021-0099 BRODIE OAKS REDEVELOPMENT SITE METRICS 37.6 Acres / 1,637,856 Sq. Ft. 56% NSA; 54% GSA 5,750 Sq. Ft. 50 feet Total Site Area Proposed Impervious Cover Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Setbacks Front Street Side Yard Interior Side Yard Rear Yard 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet LAND USE AREA METRICS Acres Building Cover Impervious Cover* Non- Residential Maximum Hotel Maximum Residential Max. % Max. Sq. Ft. Keys Sq. Ft. Units Sq. Ft. 1,400,000 200 200,000 1,700 1,500,000 11.7 .5% 5,000 -- -- -- -- Max. 95% 25.9 Land Use Area 1 Land Use Area 2 Site Total 37.6 95% 7.5% 56% *Maximum impervious cover is based on Net Site Area (NSA) and will be tracked by site plan in compliance with Exhibit H - Brodie Oaks Redevelopment Phasing Plan. Impervious Cover will be higher on a site-by-site basis. Maximum floor-to-area ratio is not applicable to the Brodie Oaks Redevelopment. L O O P 3 6 0 BARTON CREEK GREENBELT Legend: Property Boundary Private Streets with Public Access Easements Land Use Area 1 Land Use Area 2 U S S T …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASES: C814-2021-0099 – Brodie Oaks Redevelopment PUD DISTRICT: 5 C14R-81-033(RCA) – Brodie Oaks Restrictive Covenant Amendment ZONING FROM: Unzoned; GR; CS; CS-1 TO: PUD ADDRESS: 4021, 4025, 4107, 4109, 4115, and 4141 South Capital of Texas Highway Northbound; 3940, 4006, 4024 - 4040, 4200, 4220, 4236 South Lamar Boulevard Southbound SITE AREA: 37.606 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Lionstone Investments, LCFRE Austin Brodie Oaks LLC (John Schaefer) AGENT: Lionheart Places (Rebecca Leonard) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Staff recommendation is to grant planned unit development (PUD) district zoning, as shown in the Land Use Plan as provided Exhibits C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 3 - 14. The Restrictive Covenant includes all recommendations listed in the Transportation Impact Analysis Memo, dated August 31, 2022, as provided in Attachment A. The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment of the 1981 Restrictive Covenant and terminate the height limitations for Tracts A1, A2, A3, A4, and B as it applies to this property. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 3 - 14. PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD: September 26, 2022: RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE BRODIE OAKS PUD AS SUPERIOR IF THE APPLICANT AGREES TO: 1) WORK WITH STAFF AND ATD TO PROVIDE 10 FREE PARKING SPACES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SITE; 2) AMEND THE APPLICATION TO STATE THERE WILL BE A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE RESTROOM AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK; 3) CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE HILL COUNTRY CONSERVANCY AND AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION TO ENSURE THIS IS A SUSTAINABLE TRAIL ACCESSING THE BARTON CREEK GREENBELT, AND 4) INVESTIGATE AND REPORT BACK ON METHODS TO FUND OFF-SITE BARTON CREEK GREENBELT PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT THROUGH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SITE (refer to Attachment C) [S. FAUST; N. BARNARD – 2ND] (9-0) D. LEWIS AND K. TAYLOR – ABSENT 21 of 103 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: November 2, 2022: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: November 8, 2022: May 24, 2022: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF R. SCHNEIDER; J. THOMPSON – 2ND] (9-0) Y. FLORES, C. HEMPEL, J. MUSHTALER – ABSENT December 14, 2021: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF [A. AZHAR; R. SCHNEIDER – 2ND] (11-0) P. HOWARD – OFF THE DAIS; J. SHIEH – ABSENT CITY COUNCIL ACTION: December 1, 2022: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: Austin Energy has requested that …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET C14R-81-033(RCA) – Brodie Oaks Restrictive Covenant Amendment CASES: C814-2021-0099 – Brodie Oaks Redevelopment PUD DISTRICT: 5 ZONING FROM: Unzoned; GR; CS; CS-1 ADDRESS: 4021, 4025, 4107, 4109, 4115, and 4141 South Capital of Texas Highway Northbound; 3940, 4006, 4024 - 4040, 4200, 4220, 4236 South Lamar Boulevard Southbound SITE AREA: 37.606 acres PROPERTY OWNER: Lionstone Investments, LCFRE Austin Brodie Oaks LLC TO: PUD (John Schaefer) AGENT: Lionheart Places (Rebecca Leonard) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Staff recommendation is to grant planned unit development (PUD) district zoning, as shown in the Land Use Plan as provided Exhibits C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 3 - 14. The Restrictive Covenant includes all recommendations listed in the Transportation Impact Analysis Memo, dated August 31, 2022, as provided in Attachment A. The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment of the 1981 Restrictive Covenant and terminate the height limitations for Tracts A1, A2, A3, A4, and B as it applies to this property. For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 3 - 14. PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD: September 26, 2022: RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE BRODIE OAKS PUD AS SUPERIOR IF THE APPLICANT AGREES TO: 1) WORK WITH STAFF AND ATD TO PROVIDE 10 FREE PARKING SPACES TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SITE; 2) AMEND THE APPLICATION TO STATE THERE WILL BE A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE RESTROOM AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK; 3) CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE HILL COUNTRY CONSERVANCY AND AUSTIN PARKS FOUNDATION TO ENSURE THIS IS A SUSTAINABLE TRAIL ACCESSING THE BARTON CREEK GREENBELT, AND 4) INVESTIGATE AND REPORT BACK ON METHODS TO FUND OFF-SITE BARTON CREEK GREENBELT PRESERVATION AND MANAGEMENT THROUGH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT THE SITE (refer to Attachment C) [S. FAUST; N. BARNARD – 2ND] (9-0) D. LEWIS AND K. TAYLOR – ABSENT 31 of 103 C814-2021-0099 / C14R-81-033(RCA) Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: November 2, 2022: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: November 8, 2022: May 24, 2022: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF R. SCHNEIDER; J. THOMPSON – 2ND] (9-0) Y. FLORES, C. HEMPEL, J. MUSHTALER – ABSENT December 14, 2021: APPROVED AN INDEFINITE POSTPONEMENT REQUEST BY STAFF [A. AZHAR; R. SCHNEIDER – 2ND] (11-0) P. HOWARD – OFF THE DAIS; J. SHIEH – ABSENT CITY COUNCIL ACTION: December 1, 2022: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: …
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA November 2, 2022 Brodie Oaks Redevelopment PUD C814-2021-0099 Armbrust & Brown (David Armbrust) 4107 S Capital of Texas Highway COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: LOCATION: COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: Leslie Lilly, Environmental Program Coordinator, (512)535- 8914, Leslie.lilly@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: Barton Creek Watershed/Barton Springs Zone REQUEST: PUD zoning for the property STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONDITION: Staff recommended with conditions A. Development associated with C814-2021-0099, located at 4107 S Capital of Texas Highway, shall comply with 25-8, Subchapter A, Article 13 (Save Our Springs Initiative) at the time of permit application except as modified below. a. Section A of 25-8-514 (Pollution Prevention Required) shall be modified to allow a maximum impervious cover for the site of 56% net site area. B. Development associated with C814-2021-0099, located at 4107 S Capital of Texas Highway, shall comply with 25-8 Section A (Water Quality) at the time of permit application except as modified by the PUD ordinance. a. ECM 1.6.7.5 (D) shall be modified to allow captured runoff for beneficial reuse b. 25-8-341 shall be modified to allow cut not to exceed a maximum of fourteen (14) feet. c. 25-8-342 shall be modified to allow fill not to exceed a maximum of fourteen (14) feet. d. 25-8-281 shall be modified to allow encroachment into CEFs as indicated on Exhibit F. C. Additionally, development associated with C814-2021-0099, located at 4107 S Capital of Texas Highway, shall comply with the following requirements a. Reduction in impervious cover from 84% NSA to 56% NSA b. Bring the site into compliance with SOS water quality treatment requirements c. Clustering impervious cover and disturbance 75’-250’ away from Barton Creek Greenbelt d. Restoring 2 acres of the tract to native vegetation e. Provide 100% GSI for water quality controls. f. Provide rainwater harvesting for landscape irrigation of not less than 50% of the landscaped area. g. Provide superior tree protections. h. Comply with Austin Green Building 3-star rating i. Exceed landscaping requirements. j. Provide superior open space and parkland dedication. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: COUNCIL DISTRICT: 5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF CONDITION: ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA November 2, 2022 Brodie Oaks Redevelopment Site Specific SOS Amendment C814-2021-0099 Armbrust & Brown (David Armbrust) 4107 S Capital of Texas Highway Leslie Lilly, Environmental Program …
