C-1/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Kathleen Baireuther Ramirez, Elaine Sign Review Board May 9th 2022 - Case #C16-2022-0003 Wednesday, May 04, 2022 11:25:44 AM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elaine, I am a neighbor of this case and reached out to Shana for clarification about the site plan for the signs. She was very helpful and upon reviewing the proposed signage, I am in favor of the proposed variance, assuming the placement of the signs in practice is consistent with these renderings. I am not available during the meeting time on May 9th because I am traveling for work, but wanted to submit my comments in advance of the meeting. Thank you, Kathleen Baireuther 1601 E 5th St, Unit 201 Austin, TX 78702 -- Kathleen Baireuther mobile: 512.527.4864 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. C-1/2-LATE BACKUP
May 2, 2022 Felicia Foster P.O. Box 1170 Port Aransas, TX 78373 Re: C15-2022-0042 Property Description: LOT 14 BLK 1 BARTON HOLLOW Dear Felicia, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider an appeal challenging staff interpretation of LDC Chapter 25-2, Subchapter F. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
May 6, 2022 Code interpretation appeal C15-2022-0042, item E-1 on BoA agenda for May 9, 2022 Attic exemption for 2212 Trailside Zilker Neighborhood Association Zoning Committee support of building official’s decision To: Susan Barr, Manager, Residential Plan Review, City of Austin Development Services Dept., and Chair and Board Members, City of Austin Board of Adjustment, Liaison Elaine Ramirez The issue in this case seems to be the use of an attic exemption for “a living area accessible from the second floor,” as the applicant noted in citing a previous code interpretation case. The ZNA zoning committee agrees with the Development Services Department assessment that the area in question “is all within the second-floor area of the home below the roof area.” We take that to mean that the area in question does not qualify as first-floor or second-floor attic space, and the only part of it that does not count toward FAR is the nonhabitable area less than 5 feet high. Judging from the elevations submitted by the applicant (E-1/20-22), the bedroom/office space occupies an extension of the second floor, not the attic above the first floor. The house as proposed consists of one- story wings (each with its own gable-roof attic) on the front and back of the main two-story structure. The right side of the two-story structure has a separate roof that slopes down to meet the exterior wall of the ground floor. The area above the first floor is not contained within the attic gables of the one-story wings, and it is not contained within the attic above the second floor. It is part of the second floor. We are puzzled, however, by the closing sentence of the DSD interpretation: “this space would normally be used as an attic.” It appears to us that the space would NOT normally be used as an attic but rather would be designed as living space with a balcony or bay windows to provide light for the second floor. It should be noted that the lot size for this site is 7497 sf, and the .4 FAR limit allows 2999 sf of floor area. If the proposed “attic” exemption is added to the data in the application, the site would have a total building area of 5139 sf, the equivalent of .685 FAR. This will be a very large house. We respectfully request that the Board uphold the decision of the …
2212 Trailside Drive May 9, 2022 - Board of Adjustments meeting 1 E-1/1-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Subchapter F Intent • • Subchapter F is intended to minimize the impact of new construction, remodeling, and additions to existing buildings on surrounding properties in residential neighborhoods by defining an acceptable buildable area for each lot within which new development may occur. The standards are designed to protect the character of Austin's older neighborhoods by ensuring that new construction and additions are compatible in scale and bulk with existing neighborhoods. 2 E-1/2-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Subchapter F Requirements Prior to 2006, a house was only limited by: • 35’ height • 40% building coverage • 45% impervious cover • • Subchapter F introduced a 40% floor-to-area ratio (FAR) or 2,300 square feet of gross floor area (GFA) and reduced the height to 32’. For Subchapter F, GFA is all enclosed space, regardless of its dimensions, that is not exempted under subsections 3.3.2, 3.3.3, or 3.3.4. 3 E-1/3-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Subchapter F Exemptions 3.3.3 – Porch exemption 3.3.2 - Parking area exemptions 3.3.3 – Basement area exemption 4 E-1/4-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Subchapter F Exemptions (cont.) 3.3.3 – Habitable Attic exemption All of the following criteria must be met: fully contained within the roof structure. 1. The roof is not flat or mansard roof; slope of 3:12 or >. 2. 3. has only one floor. 4. does not extend beyond the footprint of the floors below. 5. highest habitable portion of the building, or a section of the building, and adds no add’l mass to the structure. 6. 50% or > has a ceiling height of 7’ or < * * See BOA code interpretation C15-2011-0110 5 E-1/5-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Subchapter F Enclosed Area 3.3.4 – Enclosed area w/ height 5’ or < An enclosed area shall be excluded from the calculation of gross floor area if it is five feet or less in height. For purposes of this subsection: A. Area is measured on the outside surface of the exterior walls; and B. Height is measured from the finished floor elevation, up to either: 1. 2. the underside of the roof rafters; or the bottom of the top chord of the roof truss, but not to collar ties, ceiling joists, or any type of furred-down ceiling 6 E-1/6-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Prior BOA Interpretation 7 E-1/7-LATE BACKUP/PRESENTATION Ceiling Height Ratio • C15-2011-0110 and BCM 4.4.5.2 (4) make it clear that the ceiling height …
May 9, 2022 Mike Mchone P.O. Box 8412 Austin TX, 78713 Re: C15-2022-0035 Property Description: W 74.9FT LOT 9 OLT 60&64 DIV D GRAHAM SUBD Dear Mike, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance. from LDC 25-2-757(E) at 2609 San Pedro Street. AE cannot approve the request until a site plan is submitted showing the proposed construction on this lot and the distances between any proposed permanent structures and the existing overhead electric distribution facilities along San Pedro Street. Also, any proposed or existing improvements must follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
May 2, 2022 Mr. Ned McDaniel 305 E St Elmo Rd #3 Austin TX, 78745 Re: C15-2022-0040 Property Description: 106.98 X 343.67FT AV BLK 5 BLOCKERS ADDN Dear Ned, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance from LDC 25-2-601. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
May 5, 2022 Lisa Gray 3530 Bee Caves Rd Austin TX, 78746 Re: C15-2022-0043 Property Description: 100X140FT BLK 3 OLT 7-8 DIVISION C Dear Lisa, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance from LDC 25-2-492 at 508 E 38th Street. Austin Energy cannot release the rear yard setback at this time due to our existing facilities along the rear of this site. Any permanent structure on this lot is required to meet 10’ clearance from the outside conductor of the overhead electric distribution line along the rear lot line. To approve this variance request, AE will need proof (site plan or survey showing distances, etc.) that this clearance will be met. Also, any proposed or existing improvements must follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 cody.shook@austinenergy.com (512) 322-6881
From: Subject: Date: C15-2022-0043 Wednesday, May 04, 2022 3:12:54 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-3/1-LATE BACKUP Sista Irie Easement hearing for May 9 Wednesday, May 04, 2022 4:28:33 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** From: To: Subject: Date: Hi Elaine, I was contacted by a close neighbor regarding a new owner on the block who is requesting an easement change from the City and has a hearing slated for May 9. The owner is Red Door LLC. There are three 'side by side' neighbors who live on this block and have some initial objections. I mistakenly threw out my objection form. We would like to ask for the hearing to be rescheduled so in order to request a meeting with Red Door LLC and ask for more information regarding the project. It is quite possible the meeting will allow us to stop the objections so it is important to everyone that we speak as a group. One of the neighbors who lives right behind them is reaching out to them later today to set up a time. Please let me know how to delay the hearing while we speak with the applicants and make sure we are all comfortable with any changes to the current City guidelines. Thank you, Beverly Shaw 512.619.1239 Beverly "Sista Irie" Shaw Media Professional, Photojournalist, Radio Broadcaster Community Radio Consultant Majesty Media, Island Stage Magazine, United Reggae 502 Texas Ave, Austin, Texas 78705 512.619.1239 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. F-3/2-LATE BACKUP F-3/3-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: Abbey Ames Ramirez, Elaine Request for delayed hearing; Reference File Name: C15-2022-0043 Address: 509 E 38th Street Thursday, May 05, 2022 1:46:14 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Elaine, I am emailing about the following permit/case: Permit/Case: 2022-000032 BA Reference File Name: C15-2022-0043 Address: 509 E 38th Street I would like to request a delayed hearing. I have tried to contact the applicant with questions I …
From: To: Subject: Date: Paige Pozzi Ramirez, Elaine Opposition case G-1-C15-2022-0011 and G-2 C15-2022-0012 Thursday, May 05, 2022 2:48:48 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Ramirez and fellow Board members, I am writing in opposition of the variance on the two properties at 2715 and 2717 Long Bow Trail Austin, TX 78734 (case numbers G-1-C15-2022-0011 and G-2 C15-2022-0012). I am a 13 year resident of Apache Shores, the Lake Austin neighborhood where these two properties are located. Our neighborhood is quickly growing and while I don’t like it, I accept it. I am not opposed to new houses being built (even on these lots, if they are built responsibly!). The growing trend of builders, especially this particular builder, seems to be to push the environmental limits to the extreme. This application for a variance is no exception. These properties are entirely too close to the lake to have so much impervious cover. Please do not approve this variance. This builder is currently building a 4 story home within 10 feet of our neighborhood’s beloved creek. That alone is my evidence for the complete and utter lack of environmental concern. When will it stop? I walk by (near) these lots several times a week on my way to the lake. I am a mom of three young kids. This letter isn’t written well, but it comes from my heart for the concern of the environment which is important to my family. Grateful for your consideration, Paige Pozzi 2503 Geronimo Trail Austin, TX 78734 512-789-7056 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. G-1/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: B.J. Carpenter Ramirez, Elaine 2715 and 2717 Longbow Trail Variance Request Thursday, May 05, 2022 3:04:46 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Ms. Ramirez As a property owner in Apache Shores and an active member in the neighborhood I would like to voice my opposition to the variance request for the two following properties. 2715 Longbow Trail, case number G-1 C15-2022-0011 2717 Longbow Trail, case number G-2 C15-2022-0012 As an environmental professional I don't believe it is in the interest of the neighborhood, environment, or City of Austin to allow a variance from the COA …
From: To: Subject: Date: Paige Pozzi Ramirez, Elaine Opposition case G-1-C15-2022-0011 and G-2 C15-2022-0012 Thursday, May 05, 2022 2:48:48 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Ramirez and fellow Board members, I am writing in opposition of the variance on the two properties at 2715 and 2717 Long Bow Trail Austin, TX 78734 (case numbers G-1-C15-2022-0011 and G-2 C15-2022-0012). I am a 13 year resident of Apache Shores, the Lake Austin neighborhood where these two properties are located. Our neighborhood is quickly growing and while I don’t like it, I accept it. I am not opposed to new houses being built (even on these lots, if they are built responsibly!). The growing trend of builders, especially this particular builder, seems to be to push the environmental limits to the extreme. This application for a variance is no exception. These properties are entirely too close to the lake to have so much impervious cover. Please do not approve this variance. This builder is currently building a 4 story home within 10 feet of our neighborhood’s beloved creek. That alone is my evidence for the complete and utter lack of environmental concern. When will it stop? I walk by (near) these lots several times a week on my way to the lake. I am a mom of three young kids. This letter isn’t written well, but it comes from my heart for the concern of the environment which is important to my family. Grateful for your consideration, Paige Pozzi 2503 Geronimo Trail Austin, TX 78734 512-789-7056 p CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. G-2/1-LATE BACKUP From: To: Subject: Date: B.J. Carpenter Ramirez, Elaine 2715 and 2717 Longbow Trail Variance Request Thursday, May 05, 2022 3:04:46 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Ms. Ramirez As a property owner in Apache Shores and an active member in the neighborhood I would like to voice my opposition to the variance request for the two following properties. 2715 Longbow Trail, case number G-1 C15-2022-0011 2717 Longbow Trail, case number G-2 C15-2022-0012 As an environmental professional I don't believe it is in the interest of the neighborhood, environment, or City of Austin to allow a variance from the …
May 2, 2022 David Cancialosi 300 E Highland Mall Blvd Austin, TX 78752 Re: C15-2022-0032 Property Description: LOT 15 BLK A RIVERCREST ADDN SEC 1 Dear David, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider variances from LDC 25-2-492(D) and 25-2-963-E-1-B at 2904 Rivercrest Dr. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881
From: To: Subject: Date: Richard Wambold Ramirez, Elaine Fwd: Case # C15-2022-0032 Friday, April 29, 2022 2:48:24 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Sorry for not getting this to you earlier. I had sent a message asking for a brief call and then accidentally misspelled your last name when I did send it. If you have any questions do no hesitate to email me. Thank you , Richard L Wambold. Begin forwarded message: From: Richard Wambold Date: April 28, 2022 at 1:36:59 PM CDT To: elaine.ramiez@austintexas.gov Subject: Case # C15-2022-0032 Owner: Cody Stavig Address : 2904 Rivercrest Drive Lot 15 Blk A Rivercrest Addition Sec 1 My name is Richard Wambold and I live next door at 2906 Rivercrest Drive. My wife and have owned the property since 2008. According to this document the property is owned by Mr Stavig. I believe he lives in Portland Oregon and we have not had the opportunity to meet him or discuss any of the issues raised in this notice. We and other neighbors who have spoken out in similar situations just want to protect the character of our neighborhood and the value of our investments. Because of this I am against granting the variances requested. The reasoning is simple and not meant as a criticism to our new neighbor or his architectural plan. We have all had to build within the same constraints as he faces and have found a way to do so. His lot is average size and doesn’t have a unique impairment that I’m aware of. I suspect he wants to add additional space in his home, most of us do. Rivercrest Drive is a beautiful narrow lane which would take on the feel of an alley if we all built out so close to it. As a next door neighbor it would block much our view of the street and block the street view of our home, potentially negatively impacting the value of our home. In closing I would like to add that I am aware of several similar requests that have either been denied or withdrawn by the applicants. Many years ago our own request, while substantially different, was denied. At the time a neighbor shared with me that the neighborhood was not responding to me or my particular H-2/1-LATE BACKUP problem. Rather it was protecting the charm that brought me there and that …
AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY FOOD POLICY BOARD (ATCFPB) RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Number: TBD Creation of a Lactation Program at the Travis County Correctional Complex WHEREAS, Travis County and the City of Austin, recognize that breastmilk is the best food source for infants and is recommended by the American Pediatrics Association that infants be provided breast milk for at least one year after birth to support enhanced growth and development. Breastfeeding supports the mother-child bond and enhances the mother’s motivation to care for her child and to stay out of the correctional system. Other health benefits have been documented in reducing the risk of chronic disease for both mother and infant and improving lifetime health outcomes. WHEREAS, ATCFPB recognizes that the CDC states that breastfeeding has health benefits for the mother too. Some cancers, type 2 diabetes, and high blood pressure are less common among women who breastfeed. Mothers who continue to lactate through an incarceration are more likely to continue to breastfeed or pump milk for baby after their incarceration ends; and WHEREAS, 25.4% of children in Travis County live in a food insecure household, which is significantly higher than the national average (21.4%)4; and WHEREAS, the ATCFPB is aware that currently lactating mothers pump to relieve lactation discomfort and pour the milk down the drain due to it being prohibited to store the milk for their infant; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Austin-Travis County Sustainable Food Policy Board recommends that Travis County and the City of Austin support the creation of a Lactation Program at the Travis County Correctional Complex. 1A community-based food system is defined as a system of exchange that strives to bring food producers and food consumers into affinity with each other, for the purposes of fostering health, promoting nutrition, building stronger community ties, keeping farm families on the land and building wealth broadly among community members. Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology, Williams, Bob and Iraj Imam. EdgePress of Inverness, 2006, page 142. 2U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012 Census of Agriculture, Travis County, Texas. 3City of Austin, Office of Sustainability. State of the Food System Report. April 2015. 4Feeding America. Map the Meal Gap 2015. 5Sustainable Food Center. Central Texas Foodshed Assessment. 2011.
NEW THERAPEUTIC POOL HOUSE 1130 SQ FT 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 476 475 474 473 472 471 470 I E N L K C A B T E S G N D L U B I I ' 5 5'-0" 40' PORTION 2 469.8' SECTION 2 LOW POINT CK. 1 485.36 485.38 703 1 CP. CGS 4WARD 476' SECTION 2 2HIGH POINT 476' SECTION 1 HIGH POINT 40' PORTION 1 472' SECTION 1 AVERAGE GRADE 468' SECTION 1 LOW POINT 25' FRONT BLDG SET BACK 1 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" EXT CARRIAGE HOUSE 448 SQ FT 1 5 ' - 3 1 / 2 " N SIG E D 1 1 2 e t i u S , 0 9 2 y a w h g H i t s e W 6 1 7 5 5 3 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A 7 1 7 5 - 1 9 2 - 2 1 5 : e c i f f O I . M O C N G S E D E S E E R C @ E T S E L E C - : l i a m E 6 6 1 1 1 # E S N E C I L I E C N E D S E R S A T S O K SCHEMATIC DOCUMENTS APRIL 22,2022 COVER / SITE PLAN DRAWING NO. A0.0 I 0 0 3 R B # N O T A R T S G E R E A B T I I N O T C U R T S N O C W E N Copyr ight 2018 C-Reese Design. C-Reese Design expressly i reserves ts common law copyr ight r and other proper ty ights regarding these plans. The plans and ar rangements depicted herein are the sole proper C-Reese Design and shal retained by recipient The plans may not be reproduced, ty of be the . l changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever , nor are they to be loaned or assigned to any thi rd par ty wi thout f i rst obtaining the express wr i t ten permission of C-Reese Design. DO NOT SCALE FROM THESE DRAWINGS. 49'-1 1/2" 43'-11" OPEN GAS FLAME FIREPLACE ELEC SEAT ELEVATOR " 7 - ' 5 9' C.H. . …
ZONED HISTORIC NOT HISTORIC REMOVE COMMERCIAL KITCHEN CONSTRUCTED CA 1964, REMODELED 1985 REMOVE DINING ROOM CONSTRUCTED CA 1964, REMODELED 1985 REMOVE STAIR INFILL CONSTRUCTED CA 1985 REMOVE RAMPS AND STEPS CONSTRUCTED CA 1991 PROTECT OAK TREE REMOVE SITE WALL CONSTRUCTED 1991 REMOVE GATEWAY AND PORTE COCHERE CONSTRUCTED 1997 DN BUILDING C BUILDING A C A BUILDING B M G REMOVE FENCE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION CA 1963, MODIFIED 1990 REMOVE CHIMNEY ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION 1981 E. 5th STREET 1 SITE PLAN - DEMO Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3908 Avenue B, #309 Austin, Texas 78751 512|751-1374 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA O'CONNELL #15432 I R E V R D E R L E T O H T O P E D D L O - R R 5 1 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A , T E E R T S h t 5 . E 4 0 5 ISSUE DATE 5/6/2022 SHEET NAME SITE PLAN DEMO SHEET NUMBER HP-101 i s e d a L 4 - 2 s n e M 3 - 2 " 0 1 - ' 5 1 N D " 0 1 - ' 5 1 N D / " 6 5 2 1 9 1 7 - ' 0 1 BUILDING C " 1 1 - ' 1 1 U C F ELEC A / R " 9 - ' 8 N N D D " 7 - ' 2 1 " 7 - ' 2 1 N N D D N N D D " 4 - ' 1 1 BUILDING C P U C A M G BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING A BUILDING B 2 SECOND FLOOR DEMO PLAN Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 FIRST FLOOR DEMO PLAN Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" LEGEND PHASE 1 DEMO PHASE 2 DEMO 3908 Avenue B, #309 Austin, Texas 78751 512|751-1374 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION TERESA O'CONNELL #15432 L E T O H T O P E D D L O - R R 5 1 0 7 8 7 S A X E T , N I T S U A , T E E R T S h t 5 . E 4 0 5 ISSUE DATE DRAFT 4/20/2022 SHEET NAME DEMO PLANS SHEET NUMBER HP-111 LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORKPROPOSED MATERIAL(S)PHASE 1 - Starting June 20221A)SITEWORK: Remove non-historic additions including the commercial kitchen and dining room addition …
Old Depot Hotel 504 E. 5th Street ca. 1872 SL Red River, LP Owner Historic designations • Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, 1966 • Contributing to the Sixth Street National Register Historic District, 1975 • Austin Landmark, 1977 Close-up of door with transom and side lites South elevation Exterior, Building A Evidence of parge coat on Building A South elevation Evidence of rising damp Missing and inappropriate mortar Interior, Building A Modern additions to be removed. East elevation
Historic Review Application For Office Use Only Date of Submission:_________________________________ Case #:____________________________________________ _________________________________________________ Historic Preservation Office approval Date of Approval:___________________________________ Property Address: ______________________________________________________ Historic Landmark Historic District (Local) National Register Historic District Historic Landmark or Historic District Name:______________________________________________________________________________________________ Applicant Name: _______________________________ Phone #: ______________________ Email: ______________________________ Applicant Address: _______________________________ City: _______________________ __ State: ________________ Zip: __________ Please describe all proposed exterior work with location and materials. If you need more space, attach an additional sheet. PROPOSED WORK LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) 1) 2) 3) Submittal Requirements ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHED 1. One set of dimensioned building plans. Plans must: a) specify materials and finishes to be used, and b) show existing and proposed conditions for alterations and additions. Site Plan Elevations Floor Plan Roof Plan 2. Color photographs of building and site: Elevation(s) proposed to be modified Detailed view of each area proposed to be modified Any changes to these plans must be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Office and/or Historic Landmark Commission. Applicant Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Submit complete application, drawings, and photos to preservation@austintexas.gov. Call (512) 974-3393 with questions. Historic Review Application Old Depot Hotel 504 E. 5th Street Austin, Texas 78701 PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK PHASE 1 - Starting June 2022 1A) STRUCTURAL: Structural stabilization of Building C may be required after modern additions are removed. Structural intervention in buildings A, B & C may be required if determined necessary by an experienced structural engineer. Interior and exterior Wood framing, masonry 1B) MASONRY: Restore exterior masonry, mortar to Building Envelope Stone and brick match historic color, composition, texture and tooling. Remove stucco on buildings from earlier rehabilitation. Investigate and address issues of rising damp. 1C) WINDOWS: All existing windows are less than 50 years old, single pane, using standard stock sizes that are smaller than the historic openings. Replace with new insulated glass windows sized to fit historic openings and match the appearance and character as indicated in historic photographs. SITEWORK: Remove non-historic additions including the commercial kitchen and dining room addition at the northeast corner of the site, the perimeter fence, porte cochere, and fountain constructed in the 1990s. Removal of these features adjacent to historic buildings should be performed in a manner to protect the historic masonry to remain. This scope was previously approved by HLC in 2017. New site work to be developed and presented …
SYMBOL LEGEND X DESIGN TEAM ARCHITECTURE O'CONNELL ARCHITECTURE, LLC TERESA O'CONNELL, AIA 3908 AVENUE B, SUITE 309 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78751 512.751.1374 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TSEN ENGINEERING 210 BARTON SPRINGS RD. SUITE 250 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78704 512.474.4001 CIVIL ENGINEERING DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES, L.P. 5707 SOUTHWEST PARKWAY, SUITE 2-250 AUSTIN, TEXAS. 78735 817.335.1121 SITE LOCATION MAP FFE 0" FFE OR GRADE ELEVATION AS NOTED ELEVATION (LARGE SCALE) 112 DOOR NUMBER 116 WINDOW NUMBER A WALL TYPE (PLAN VIEW) NEW WALL (PLAN VIEW) W E 1/A-401 ELEVATION (SMALL SCALE) SECTION DETAIL CL CENTERLINE PLAN/ ELEVATION DETAIL EQUAL DIMENSIONS IN LINE A-211 1 N S 1 A-211 1 A-211 MATERIALS LEGEND BRICK MASONRY FRAMING WOOD (Detail Scale) BATT INSULATION CONCRETE (Detail Scale) BLOCKING - NON-CONTINUOUS (Detail Scale) EARTH FINISHED WOOD STEEL (Detail Scale) PLYWOOD RIGID INSULATION PLASTER OR CONCRETE AS NOTED (Detail Scale) NEW PARTITION WALL (see plan legend) ABBREVIATIONS & # @ And Pound At Air Conditioning A/C ACOUST Acoustical ADD'L Additional ADJ AFF AHJ AHU APPROX Approximately ARCH ASTM American Society for Testing Adjacent Above Finish Floor Authority Having Jurisdiction Air Handling Unit Architect & Materials Bottom of Rafter BOR Board BRD BLDG Building BDRM Bedroom BTM BTWN Between Bottom Cabinet Cubic Feet Control Joint Centerline Ceiling Closet Clear Column CAB CF CJ CL CLG CLO CLR COL COMP Composite CONC CONST Construction CONT COORD Coordinate, Coordination Critical Root Zone CRZ Cover CVR Cold Water CW Continuous Concrete Deep, Depth, Dryer Double D DBL DEMO Demolish, Demolition Double Hung DH Diameter DIA Diagonal, Diagonally DIAG Down DN Downspout DS Dishwasher DW Drawing DWG Drawer DWR East Each Expansion Joint Electric Meter Equal Spacing, Equivalent Equipment E EA EJ EM EQ EQUIP EXST'G Existing Exterior EXT MANUF Manufacturer MAX Maximum MECH Mechanical M/E MEP Mechanical/Electrical Mechanical, Electrical, & Plumbing Minimum MIN MISC Miscellaneous MTD Mounted MTL Metal N NA NIC NO NSF NTS North Not Applicable Not in Contract Number Net Square Feet Not to Scale OC On Center OCEW On Center Each Way OP'G OVHD Overhead OZ Opening Ounce P&I PC PG PL PR PSF PSI PT PTD PVC PVMT PWD Provide & Install Photo Cell Page Plate or Plateline Pair Pounds Per Square Foot Pounds Per Square Inch Pressure Treated Painted Polyvinyl Chloride Pavement Plywood QTR Quarter Radius/Refrigerator Reflected Ceiling Plan R RCP RE/REF Reference REINF Reinforced REQ'D Required REQMT'S Requirements Revision REV Roofing RFG Room RM Rough Opening RO ROW Right of …
813 Park Blvd. ca. 1929 Miller-Long House XINESI Holdings, LLC Owner South elevation REPLACE ROOF West elevation REPAIR AND REPOINT MASONRY East elevation SITE CONDITION REPLACE ROOF Main House and Garage Sun porch Attic Basement Structural issues in Main House INTERIOR SIDE OF STUCCO RESTORE HISTORIC LIGHTING Stucco and historic lighting REMOVE AND REPLACE STUCCO Garage – Stucco and evidence of original awning Garage - Double hung windows Main House – Steel sash casement windows Main House – Repair and replace rotted wood Main House Garage Main House Restore historic doors Repair and repoint masonry. Repair and replace concrete skirt. Main House Garage Main House Main House Replace all bathroom fixtures and tile. Reconfigure layouts. Main House – Restore interior woodwork
PROPOSED WORK PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) Historic Review Application 813 Park Blvd. Austin, Texas 78751 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) GENERAL EXTERIOR: Replace rotted wood at eaves and trim with new to match original detailing. Repair and repoint masonry and replace stucco on both buildings. Paint finish to match historic. SITEWORK: Make grade modifications to correct negative slope and improve drainage. Provide new landscape features to enhance property and showcase building. Install new fence on east and north perimeters of property. Install brick terrace on south side of house with new ramp and stair access. WINDOWS: Remove, restore and reinstall all existing steel sash casement windows in Main House. Enlarge the Attic window on south elevation to meet code requirements, maintaining character of historic windows; Replace existing double hung windows in Garage with new aluminum-clad wood sash windows to match historic; Pella, Marvin, or approved equal. Remove windows in opening 4 in their entirety, since 8' tall masonry wall is less than 14" away from exterior wall. Frame and infill opening 4 with new stucco. DOORS: Restore all historic exterior doors and main entry screen door. Install new door at opening 116 that is architecturally compatible with other original doors. Create new paired metal-framed, multi-lite French doors with character similar to casement windows to replace windows 19 and 20 out to the new terrace.Restore Garage doors and fix in place per details. Replace plywood at opening 5 with new window to match historic. Enlarge opening 3 to accommodate new exterior door. GENERAL INTERIOR: Reconfigure existing bathrooms and kitchen; install accessible bathroom; restore floors, doors and paneling; building finish out for both buildings, Attic in Main House will have one bedroom, one bath and a small kitchenette; convert paired entry doors to current study to larger door for accessibility compliance. Rehabiliatation of Garage as dwelling unit, adding one bedroom and bathroom upstairs and additional living space at the first level. 9) GENERAL: All work will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and applicable COA Design Standards. Throughout Building Envelope Brick, wood, cement skirt LOCATION OF PROPOSED WORK Entire lot Building Envelope Steel, wood Building Envelope Wood Interior Wood, tile, paint Design Standards and Guidelines for Historic Properties Adopted December 2012 Design Standards and Guidelines for Historic Properties Landmarks and National Register historic district properties If you are making changes to a historic landmark, the project must comply with these standards …
