Urban Transportation Commission May 7, 2024 Shared Mobility Program Update Joseph Al-hajeri, Parking Enterprise Manager Michael Kimbro, Shared Mobility Supervisor 1 5/3/2024 Shared Mobility Services BRIEFING OVERVIEW 2023 System Overview Speed Limit Reduction Operational Policies/ Data Collection Regulation Background Recent Program Updates: Licensing & Permitting Designated Staging/ Parking Areas Recent Program Updates: Operations Next Steps Q&A 2 5/3/2024 Shared Mobility Services 2023 System Overview Current Operators | Fleet Size Lime | 3,700 scooters & 180 ebikes Bird | 3000 scooters 2023 Total Trips Lime 1,868,208 scooters & 63,402 ebikes Bird 791,337 Link 224,246 Wheels 33,109 Total Distance Travelled 2,927,690 miles Trips per Major Area 2,081,017 (70%) within DAPCZ 395,048 (13%) within UT/West Campus Events Austin City Limits Festival Weekend One: 59,175 trips Weekend Two: 62,881 trips SXSW 142,540 trips 16,556 median trips per day (7,315 typically) 3 5/3/2024 Shared Mobility Services Quick Background Regulation Texas Transportation Code, Title 7 • Chapter 551. - Operation of bicycles and mopeds, golf carts, and other low- powered vehicles. Title 14 Use of Streets and Public Property • § 14-9-23 - City-wide dockless transportation license authorized. • § 14-9-24 - City-wide dockless transportation unit placement plan. • § 14-9-25 - License amendment, suspension, or revocation. Title 12 Traffic Enforcement • § 12-2 - Micro-Mobility Devices and Bicycles. Director Rules for Deployment and Operation of Shared Small Vehicle Mobility Systems City Approved Fees Fee Type License Fee Fee Schedule $1,500 per year Collection Collected bi-annually in December & June Per Device Permit Fee $80 per device/ per year Collected bi-annually in December & June Per Trip Fee $0.15 per trip Collected Monthly 4 5/3/2024 Shared Mobility Services Operational Policies/Data Collection Data from provider API utilizing Mobility Data Specification Data aggregated by Ride Report Real-time visibility and reporting How TPW Monitors/ Enforcement • Third-party data management • Geofencing/device performance restrictions • Calls/Customer Service Requests (CSR) • CSR response audits • Staff device audits • Shared communications channel during special events Results of Enforcement of Director Rules • • • Impounds Reduction in Service Denial of license and/or device permits 5 5/3/2024 Shared Mobility Services Recent Program Updates License & Permit Changes Maintain the number of licensed micro-mobility vendors at 2. No increases to device permits for current licensed operators. ACTIVE ACTIVE Maintain the total number of permitted scooters citywide at 6,700. ACTIVE 6 5/3/2024 Shared Mobility Services Recent Program Updates Operations Changes Reduce …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE Wednesday, April 17, 2024 – 11:00 A.M. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, Texas 78752 Some members of the committee may participate by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-3393 or preservation@austintexas.gov. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: X X X Raymond Castillo, Chair Roxanne Evans Ben Heimsath DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. March 20, 2024 MOTION: Approve the minutes from March 20, 2024 by Castillo, Evans seconding. Vote: 3-0 DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Debrief from Nuts & Bolts Open House on March 28 Good attendance; people appeared to be engaged 3. Discuss lessons learned and activities for Community Open House on May 23 Have a short speaking program, either once or repeated Talk more about where draft plan’s recommendations fit in Multiple copies of the draft plan were good in March—do that again Play videos on loop for background The City will not purchase alcohol 4. Preview outreach and activities for Block Party on April 20 Extreme weather is possible Go/no-go decision will be made with Preservation Austin before April 20 5. Review upcoming outreach about the draft Equity-Based Preservation Plan (board and commission briefings, tabling at community events) Request to brief the Building and Standards Commission USGBC Texas webinar on Wednesday, Nov. 15 at noon; move the Preservation Plan Committee meeting earlier that day Committee members are welcome to join meetings, commission briefings, and deep dives 6. Discuss timing for a briefing to the Historic Landmark Commission this summer Aim to brief the full commission on community engagement in June Present the final plan to the commission in September for review and recommendation Consider a joint workshop with the Preservation Plan Working Group before that Brief Council offices on the plan in August, with commissioners invited to attend Brief other City boards and commissions on the final plan in fall 2024 5. Brainstorm approaches to …
Business Expansion Program Update Economic Development Department Economic Prosperity Commission May 15, 2024 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND UPDATE PROCESS Chapter 380 Revision: State Local Code LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE TITLE 12. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SUBTITLE A. MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 380. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO MUNICIPAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Sec. 380.001. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. (a) The governing body of a municipality may establish and provide for the administration of one or more programs, including programs for making loans and grants of public money and providing personnel and services of the municipality, to promote state or local economic development and to stimulate business and commercial activity in the municipality. 1 C I T Y O F A U S T I N Current Program Development Background In 2018 EDD Staff utilized feedback from an extensive engagement process in development of the current Program Guidelines • Community conversations included 8 Sessions, held in each Council District • Stakeholder sessions with attendance ranging from 7 to 90, with 260 participants that provided approximately 2,500 comments Current Chapter 380 Policy and Program adopted by City Council • Community benefits incorporated by reference At that time, City Council authorized the City Manager to develop a Location Enhancement Program Business Expansion Program application, scoring matrix and scoring guidance developed by staff post City Council approval • Commitment to community benefits used to score project applications, but not a requirement for project eligibility • Application questions are not adequately tied to outcomes in scoring guidance • Eligibility and performance metrics lack transparency C I T Y O F A U S T I N Business Expansion Program Desired Program Impact Overarching goal is supporting economic growth through the creation of notable targeted job opportunities, in balance with strong commitments to community benefits Program Categories Local Expansions (Category 1) • 5 New Full-Time Jobs created over 5 Years • Operational for >12 months within City of Austin Targeted Hiring (Category 2) • Create one or more apprenticeships or internships • Create one or more full-time jobs hired and retained Austinites facing economic and socio-economic barriers to employment External Attractions (Category 3) • 75 New Full-Time Jobs created over 10 Years • Firm has no Austin Presence or project delivers new operation C I T Y O F A U S T I N Targeted Community Benefits Talent Development Diversity, Inclusion & Equity Business Type / Sector/ Industry Diversification Quality …
1107 E 10th Street ADU Design Review Architecture Review Committee Meeting Wednesday May 15, 2024 East 10th Steet 45-foot electrical pole 35-foot electrical pole 45-foot electrical pole 35.5-foot electrical pole 45-foot electrical pole 35-foot structure 35-foot electrical pole 10th Street Streetview ADUs - Robertson Stuart District 1004 E 9th Street 1105 E 9th Street 1104 E 8th Street 1105 E 9th Street 1104 E 8th Street Robertson Stuart District – Recent Construction East North
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20240515-003 Date: May 15, 2024 Subject: 3 Men Movers Variances, SP-2023-0294C Motion by: Perry Bedford WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting: Second by: Haris Qureshi 1. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-301 to allow driveway construction on slopes greater than 2. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-302 to allow building and parking construction on slopes 15%; over 15%; 3. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut up to 12 feet 4. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill up to 15 feet. AND WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in Gilleland Creek Watershed, Suburban Classification; and THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the variance request with the following conditions: Staff Conditions: 1. Terrace and vegetate steep slopes. 2. Provide enlarged parking lot islands (3) that are approximately 17 feet wide for improved tree growth. 3. Provide enhanced tree mitigation (5 additional trees). Environmental Commission Conditions: 1. Plant native plants and trees that are consistent with Blackland prairie species throughout the property, not just on terraces and slopes. 2. Retain as many existing native species trees as possible. 3. Have a tree maintenance plan to ensure that planted trees and vegetation can become established (minimum 5 year plan.) 4. Research the feasibility of adding solar power to the property where possible/practical. Vote: 8-0 For: Perry Bedford, Hanna Cofer, Peter Einhorn, Mariana Krueger, Colin Nickells, Haris Qureshi, Melinda Schiera, David Sullivan 1 of 2 Against: None Abstain: Richard Brimer Absent: Jennifer Bristol Attest: Perry Bedford, Environmental Commission Chair 2 of 2
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20240515-004 Date: May 15, 2024 Subject: Sunfield PUD Amendment #1, C814-2014-0083.01 Motion by: Perry Bedford WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting to amend a PUD; AND WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in Onion Creek, Rinard Creek and Plum Creek Watersheds, Suburban Classification; and THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the variance request with the following conditions: Staff Conditions: Second by: Mariana Krueger 1. This project shall comply with current PUD requirements, except for the following exceptions: a. Section 25-8-341 modified to allow cut up to20 ft b. Section 25-8-342 modified to allow fill up to 20 ft c. Modification of protected CWQZs as shown in Exhibit F d. Modification to Land Use Plan to permit a light industrial/warehouse use on approximately 91 acres. 2. The project shall incorporate bird-friendly design criteria into the development including compliance with the following Austin Energy Green Building Star Rating System criteria for: a. ST7 Light Pollution Reduction; b. STEL5 Bird Collision Deterrence 3. Water quality treatment will adhere to current COA code requirements. Where feasible, the project shall be designed to direct stormwater to vegetated pervious areas before water enters the gray stormwater system, including but not limited to swales, filter strips, infiltration trenches and infiltration basins. 4. The project will require 10% more trees than minimally required by the current PUD ordinance and current code regulations. 5. 5. The project will provide enhanced stabilization measures including terracing and retaining walls for areas exceeding 8 feet of cut or fill. 6. A minimum of 100 square feet of landscape islands for every 12 parking spaces will be provided. The landscape islands will be a minimum of 10 feet wide. 1 of 2 7. A minimum of two electric vehicle charging stations per multifamily apartment complex will be provided in parking lots adjacent to multi-family apartments. Environmental Commission Conditions: 1. Research the feasibility of adding solar power to the property where practical/possible. 2. Continue to work with Capital Metro about adding access to public transformation at the property as the project progresses. 3. 10 percent of all parking shall be pre-wired for electric vehicle capability. Vote: 8-1 For: Perry Bedford, Hanna Cofer, Peter Einhorn, Mariana Krueger, Colin Nickells, Haris Qureshi, Melinda Schiera, David Sullivan Against: Richard Brimer Abstain: None Absent: Jennifer Bristol Attest: Perry Bedford, Environmental Commission Chair 2 of 2
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20240515-005 Date: May 15, 2024 Subject: January Drive Flood Risk Reduction Project, SP-2022-0531D Motion by: Perry Bedford WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the applicant is requesting to allow construction of drainage infrastructure within 50-feet of seep/ spring Critical Env Feature (CEF); AND WHEREAS, the Environmental Commission recognizes the site is located in Walnut Creek, Suburban Development Zone; THEREFORE, the Environmental Commission recommends the variance request with the following conditions: Staff Conditions: Second by: Peter Einhorn 1. Repair erosion throughout area. 2. Place Grow Zone Signs at 100 ft intervals, 30 ft from curb. 3. Expand native planting and seeding throughout the Grow Zone and the curb (no plantings outside of the Grow Zone; sod area for stabilization can remain.) 4. Ensure that placement of topsoil, temp irrigation and weed management are included with the restoration. 5. Remove remaining driveway aprons and replace with curb and gutter. Vote: 9-0 For: Perry Bedford, Richard Brimer, Hanna Cofer, Peter Einhorn, Mariana Krueger, Colin Nickells, Haris Qureshi, Melinda Schiera, David Sullivan Against: None Abstain: None Absent: Jennifer Bristol Attest: Perry Bedford, Environmental Commission Chair 1 of 1
Bond Oversight Commission Discussion Items May 15, 2024 Executive Lead: Stephen Grace, PE, PMP Assistant Director Capital Delivery Services “Effectively and Efficiently Deliver Quality Projects with the Concept of Speed” 1 Discussion Items - Discussion Item #3: Capital Improvement Project Benchmarks - Discussion Item#4: Future Departmental Presentation Recommendation City of Austin | Capital Delivery Services Department | One City, One Team, One Approach 2 Discussion Item #3 Capital Improvement Project Benchmarks - Preliminary - Design - Bid/Award/Execution - Construction - Post-Construction City of Austin | Capital Delivery Services Department | One City, One Team, One Approach 3 Discussion Item #3 City of Austin | Capital Delivery Services Department | One City, One Team, One Approach 4 Discussion Item #4 Future Departmental Presentation Recommendation January February March April May June July August September October November December No presenters Affordable Housing Bond HWA Cancelled No presenters FSD Bond Framework No meeting Holiday FSD Annual GO Bond Sale/Annual Internal Review Fire/EMS TPW Mobility Bond PARD WPD TBD City of Austin | Capital Delivery Services Department | One City, One Team, One Approach 5
Capital Improvement Program Budget and Finance Steven Linett | Acting Budget & Performance Manager Belinda Weaver | Treasurer Topics • Capital Improvement Program Process • 2018 Bond Development • Debt Issuance Process • Active Program Status Capital Improvement Program Process Capital Needs Identification and Planning • Concepts identified through policy and planning documents and renewal/reinvestment needs Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Capital Budget • Documents projects which Departments reasonably expect to fund • Citywide FY24-28 Spending Plan =$11.491B • Citywide FY24 Spending Plan = $1.596B • Council approves authority to spend capital dollars (appropriations) • Citywide FY24 Appropriation: $1.764B 2018 Bond Development and Election Process • August 2016 - City Council established a Bond Election Advisory Task Force (BEATF) through a council resolution • Through 2017 - Task force and working group meetings on engagement plan, needs assessments, priorities, financial constraints • Fall/Winter 2017/2018 – Community input meetings Council • April 2018 – BEATF Recommendation to • May 2018 – Staff Updates to Recommendations Staff Starting Point Recommendation (June 2017) BEATF Recommendation and Staff Update (2018) 2018 Bond Development and Election Process • June 2018 – City Council directs City Manager to call election in November 2018 • August 2018 – City Council passes ballot language and guidance for implementation (Contract with the Voters) for $925M bond • September-October 2018 – Community open houses • November 2018 – Bond election 2018 Bond Program Implementation • November 2018 – February 2019 – Departments identify early-out project needs; work on implementation strategies & contracting needs • March 2019 – First appropriation of 2018 Bond funds ($151.2M) & reimbursement resolution • August 2019 – First authorization to issue debt tied to 2018 Bond program • October 2019 – Additional appropriations occur in FY2019 Capital Budget and subsequent years • April 30, 2024 – program 57% spent down five years out from initial appropriation Steps to Sell or Issue Debt Spring 2023 Develop CIP Plan August 2023 for FY2023-4 Annual Capital Budget Appropriations Reimbursement Resolutions Spring/Summer/Fall 2024 Develop Bond Sale Schedule Preliminary Official Statement Council Action on Bond Sales Bond Sales and Closing • Work on upcoming bond sale began Spring 2023 • Debt to be sold in upcoming bond sale supports projects and appropriations (authority to spend) previously approved by City Council • Use of Reimbursement Resolution allows projects to begin now and get funded later • Consistent with IRS regulations • Consistent with …
1205 Cotton Presentation for Historic Commission Current Structure - Architectural Integrity Substantially Diminished 1205 Cotton St - Timeline Overview • Year 1900 – 1203 Cotton (now 1205 Cotton) had a home different than current home located there • Year 1912 – Yerwoods purchased the home at 1203 Cotton (now 1205 Cotton) • Years 1912 to 1932 The original home was assumed to be demolished • • 1203 Cotton was readdressed to 1205 Cotton • Year 1932 – Original 1,344 SF home that exists today was constructed • Year 1950 – Home from 1203 Cotton was relocated to the backyard of 1205 Cotton • Year 1977 – Mrs. Yerwood passed away • Year 1982 – Addition constructed Sanborn Map – Year 1900 Notes: • 1203 Cotton (as shown here) later readdressed as 1205 Cotton • Yerwoods purchased this home in December 1912 (Source: Historical Commission Staff Report) • The home purchased by the Yerwoods at such time was not the same house that currently sits at 1205 Cotton Sanborn Map – Year 1921 Notes: • The home shown at 1205 Cotton was not the same house that currently sits at 1205 Cotton Year 1932 - Original home constructed Notes: • 1,344 SF home constructed at 1205 Cotton (Source: TCAD) • Same time we assume demolition of prior house shown on Sanborn maps occurred before construction Year 1950 – Home relocated from 1203 Cotton Notes: • A home from 1203 Cotton was moved behind 1205 Cotton (but on same lot) Sanborn Map – Year 1972 Notes: • Shows original house constructed at 1205 Cotton, including the back porch that would later be enclosed after Mrs. Yerwood’s death in 1977 • Shows home that was moved from 1203 Cotton Year 1982 – Addition to 1205 Cotton Notes: • Building permit showing an addition was done after Mrs. Yerwood’s death • • It is assumed prior to this construction the second home (moved from 1203 Cotton) was demolished. It is assumed at this time the back porch was also enclosed, and the garage was added Year 1982 – Addition to 1205 Cotton Cont. Notes continued: • The addition was done such that the original integrity of the home is diminished • Example 1: Back exterior wall was not demolished, and you can see siding in the interior (pictured) • Example 2 & 3: Next slide Year 1982 – Addition to 1205 Cotton Cont. Notes …
May, 6 2024 Jared & Rachel Bowden 1207 Cotton Austin TX 78702 Historic Landmark Commission City of Austin Austin, TX Subject: Support for the Demolition of 1205 Cotton Street Dear Members of the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission, I am writing to express my support for the demolition of 1205 Cotton Street. While we appreciate the history and beautiful old homes in our neighborhood (including our home, built in 1928), we do not think 1205 Cotton is integral to maintaining the neighborhood’s character. We support making space for the new owners to redevelop their lot without undue constraints. Sincerely, Jared & Rachel Bowden
May 14, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission Re: Demolition of 1205 Cotton Street Dear Commissioners, I am the current resident of 1214 Cotton Street. I am writing to express my support for the demolition of 1205 Cotton Street. The subject home at 1205 Cotton Street is in very poor condition, and I believe a redevelopment would enhance the street and the area. Thank you for considering my support for this. Sincerely, Neal Weaver 1214 Cotton St. Austin TX 78702
May 8, 2024 Paul Stables 1182 Navasota Austin TX 78702 cooeeyakka@gmail.com 512.826.1043 St. St. & 1206 Cotton Historic City of Austin Landmark Commission Re: Support for the Demolition of 1205 Cotton Street Dear Commissioners, I am writing to express around the corner at 1182 Navasota across the street at 1206 Cotton Street. my support for the demolition Street of 1205 Cotton Street. a new personal and am building Currently, I live home immediately As a resident The current of this neighborhood, detracts condition from the beauty and character I have witnessed firsthand the deterioration of our neighborhood of this property. and street. Having inspected practical while providing and beneficial an inferior the property result. myself when it was for sale, I believe course of action. A rehabilitation would require that demolition extensive is the most resources Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter. Sincerely, Paul Stables
ROMIT AGGARWAL & GUPTA MONIKA 501 TEXAS AVE AUSTIN TX SF3 -NP MAIN HOUSE REMODEL WITH SQFT ADDITION ADU INTERIOR REMODEL SHEET INDEX GENERAL G-001 G-002 COVER SHEET NOTES ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AS-001 AS-002 AS-003 AS-004 SURVEY ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN TREE PLAN ELECTRICAL LINES/POLES EXISTING PLANS DEMOLITION PLANS A-101 A-102 A-103 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR ADU PLANS A-104 A-105 A-106 1ST FLOOR 2ND FLOOR ADU PLANS BUILDING 1 - remodel with sqft addition A-107 A-108 A-109 A-110 A-111 A-112 A-113 PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR ROOF PLAN ELEVATIONS ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL 1ST FLOOR ELECTRICAL 2ND FLOOR BUILDING 2 - remodel BUILDING 3 - new construction A-203 A-205 A-204 A-206 PROPOSED PLANS ROOF PLAN ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL PLANS A-301 A-302 A-303 A-304 FLOOR PLANS ROOF PLAN ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL PLANS GENERAL CONDITIONS. 1. These documents comprise a portion of a contract between the Owner and the General Contractor. No contract is implied or stated between the Owner and any other party, nor between the Building Designer and any party. 2. No set of contract documents is able to contain all the information required to construct a project. Interpretation by the General Contractor is required. By use of these documents, both the Owner and the General Contractor assent to this understanding of the nature of contract documents. 3. The General Contractor is responsible for the provision of minor details and appurtenances not shown in the contract documents. 4. The General Contractor and his/her subcontractors are responsible for the final design of the HVAC, plumbing, and electrical systems. 5. The General Contractor may not revise or modify the contract documents, in whole or in part, without the prior approval of the Owner. Consultation with the Building Designer beforehand is strongly recommended. And precicely locate all the piping, fitting, offsets, bends, devices and equipments. 6. The General Contractor may not modify the plans, elevations, or site plan shown in the contract documents without obtaining Building Designer consultation and Owner approval beforehand. 7. Should the Owner request changes to the contract documents, the General Contractor is responsible for ensuring that the changes do not result in a built condition that does not comply with codes and/or regulations. Consultation with the Building Designer and/or an Inspector is highly recommended. 8. The Building Designer is not an inspector and is not liable for the General Contractor's failure to execute the Work in accordance with the contract documents and/or in conformance …
Medici Cafe - HLC 05.15.24 1101 West Lynn 1 A3.13 1 A3.10 1 4 5 EASON STREET (40' PUBLIC R.O.W. WIDTH) 2 A3.13 A3.01 1 2 A3.10 2 4 5 1 A3.11 3 4 5 25' COMPATIBILITY (NO STRUCTURE) 30'-0" LOADING SPACE POLE TO BE DEMO 3'-0" TYP (3) WATER METER BOXES 21"X37" PROPERTY LINE RISER ROOM DUMPSTERS CORE 673.45 SF ELEC. METER 15' SETBACK Z 2 A3.11 4 4 5 5 4 5 TRANSFORMER 7'-0" PLANTING 5'-0" SIDEWALK #5457 5'-3 3/4" 10'-0" 5'-0" 10'-0" 7.1 6.1 3.1 1 4 5 T E E R T S H T 2 1 W ) H T D I W . W . O . R C I L B U P ' 0 6 ( 2 1 1 . 3 A 0 4 5 2 2 1 . 3 A MANHOLE MANHOLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETAIL 3985.68 SF " 0 - ' 8 2 L A R U M . T S I X E 0 0 . 3 A 2 ) ' 7 2 . 7 2 1 E " 4 5 ' 8 0 ° 2 6 S ( E N I L Y T R E P O R P 543.5' CORE - INT 302.15 SF P U COMMN. EXT. 1651.91 SF AMENITIES 725.61 SF 543.5' UP PROPOSED RESTAURANT 2123.81 SF 539.5' P U P U DN 0'-0" P U P U RETAIL 1428.57 SF RETAIL 1094.19 SF FLEX 1413.97 SF 539.5' CORE - INT 500.51 SF 538.38' AMENITIES 935.59 SF 541.5' 541.5' P U 537' GREASE TRAP PROPERTY LINE CORE 72.98 SF TERRACE 66.00 SF 543.5' TOWNHOUSE 1435.16 SF #5456 CORE 163.67 SF DOG PARK 2 1 0 . 3 A . 2 1 1 3 A GREASE TRAP 6'-6" PLANTING 7'-6" CURB 4'-0" 5'-0" UP UP EXISTING, MEDICI 1141.81 SF ALIGN 1'-9" " 1 - ' 3 8 3 5 WATER METER TO BE RE-USED 0 4 5 9 3 5 8 3 5 7 3 5 1 A3.13 POLE TO BE DEMO ELECTRIC UTILITY 6 3 5 1 A3.10 WEST LYNN STREET (PUBLIC R.O.W. WIDTH VARIES) 2 A3.13 1 A3.00 535 MANHOLE INLET BURIED POLE TO BE DEMO 5 3 5 VALET 2 A3.10 6 3 5 7 3 5 1 A3.11 9 3 5 2 A3.11 0 4 5 Thank You!
120'-4" 55'-4" 76'-2" E 6TH ST. 251'-10" FFE 462 FFE 462 SL. DN. 4.5% FFE 459.5 FFE 459.5 9'-0" TYP. " 0 - ' 8 1 . P Y T " 6 " 0 - ' 4 2 " 0 - ' 8 1 " 0 - ' 4 2 " 0 - ' 8 1 " 0 - ' 8 1 " 0 - ' 4 2 " 0 - ' 8 1 " 0 - ' 8 1 " 0 - ' 4 2 " 0 - ' 8 1 SL. UP 10% " 0 - ' 1 PARKING GARAGE 137 SPACES THIS LEVEL FFE 462 FFE 462 SL. DN. 4.5% FFE 459.5 FFE 459.5 " 0 - ' 7 2 2 . T S R E V R D E R I 18'-0" 24'-0" 77'-4" 55'-4" 29'-8" 24'-0" FFE 462 SL. DN. 4.5% FFE 459.5 FFE 459.5 FFE 462 FFE 462 SL. DN. 4.5% FFE 459.5 FFE 459.5 MECH. INTAKE STO. STAIR #3 ELEC. ELEV. 2 BUILDING ABOVE PROPERTY LINE . T S E N B A S I ELEV. 1 MECH. EXHAUST MAINT. ELEC. STAIR #1 18'-0" 3'-6" GREASE INTERCEPTOR / SUMP PUMP E 5TH ST. BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL B - OVERALL 01 SCALE: 1/16' = 1'-0" N O R T H HENSLEY LAMKIN RACHEL, INC. DALLAS ● HOUSTON ● SEATTLE WWW.HLRINC.NET PH: 972.726.9400 SENIOR PROJECT MGR: JV PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWN BY: TEAM: REVISIONS BRUCE W. RACHEL, AIA TX LICENSE NO. 14373 PRELIMINARY DRAWING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C 2024 HENSLEY LAMKIN RACHEL, INC. DOCUMENTS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE GIVEN IN CONFIDENCE AND REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF HENSLEY LAMKIN RACHEL, INC. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED, OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF HENSLEY LAMKIN RACHEL, INC. Project Title: THE GRANT AUSTIN, TEXAS Developed by: SCHEMATIC DESIGN: 03.25.24 Project #: 23390 Drawing No. A3.1 BUILDING PLAN LEVEL B - OVERALL BALCONY ABV. CANOPY ABV. CANOPY ABV. CANOPY ABV. ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY 274'-6 1/2" E 6TH ST. 01/A4.1 FFE 473 FFE 473 FFE 470.50 FFE 470.50 03 A4.6 BALCONY ABV. HATCH INDICATED BALCONIES AND CANOPIES THAT EXTEND BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING ABOVE PATIO OUTDOOR PATIO 755 SF FFE 470.50 01 A4.6 BUILDING ABOVE PATIO RETAINING WALL AT PATIO EDGE 01 A4.6 GAS METERS 02 A4.6 OUTDOOR PATIO 791 SF FFE 473 STAIR #4 TRASH RM. FFE 475.5 GARAGE …
