SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8J-2019-0090 COMMISSION DATE: June 28, 2022 SUBDIVISION NAME: Stoney Ridge Highlands ADDRESS: 7527 Elroy Road APPLICANT: KB Home Lone Star Inc. AGENT: Carlson, Brigance & Doering, Inc. (Bill Couch, P.E) ZONING: SF-4A (single family residence) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: n/a / E.T.J. AREA: 224.27 acre (9,898, 574 sf) LOTS: 588 COUNTY: Travis DISTRICT: 2 WATERSHED: Dry Creek East Creek JURISDICTION: Full Purpose SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks will be constructed along streets. VARIANCE: None DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of Stoney Ridge Highlands preliminary plan comprised of 588 lots on 224.27 acres (9,898, 574 sf). The preliminary plan complies with the criteria for approval and staff recommends approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Balance of Tract information: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plan. This plan meets applicable State and City of Austin land development code requirements. The Land Development Code Section 30-2-34(B) Original Tract Requirement states that a preliminary plan should include all land in an original tract. Code allows for the following options to address the Original Tract or Balance of Tract requirement. If a property is a balance of tract from an original tract: The property with the balance of tract should have direct access to a public street, Or, the applicant should provide access to a public street by dedicating right-of-way that is at least 50 foot wide. The property for the proposed Stoney Ridge Highlands Preliminary Plan is part of an original 274.24 acre tract as demonstrated in Exhibit C, the preliminary plan is subdividing the remainder of the original tract. The properties located to the north of the proposed preliminary plan are not part of the original 274.24 acre tract and not a balance of tract. Since the property to the north of the preliminary plan is not a balance of tract, the preliminary plan would not be required to provide access to the property or dedicate right-of-way to the property. Additionally, the properties to the north of the preliminary plan are exempt from platting. These properties have approved Land Status Determinations granted in March 2003 which would exempt them from platting and would not be considered a balance of tract. CASE MANAGER: Cesar Zavala PHONE: 512-974-3404 E-mail: cesar.zavala@austintexas.gov ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Vicinity map Exhibit B: Proposed preliminary plan Exhibit C: Balance of Tract Exhibit EXHIBIT A `
Overview of the Community Health Worker Hub June 28, 2022 LAURA G. LA FUENTE – INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR LISA BLACKWELL - PROGRAM SUPERVISOR Community Health Worker “A community health worker is a frontline public health worker who is a trusted member of and/or has an unusually close understanding of the community served. This trusting relationship enables the worker to serve as a liaison/link/intermediary between health/social services and the community to facilitate access to services and improve the quality and cultural competence of service delivery.” The Path to the Hub 2019 – Request for Career Ladder Progression for Community Health Worker (CHW) Family. 2019/2020 – Internal plans developed to launch a CHW HUB 2021 – Reimagining Public Safety Taskforce Public Health Recommendations August 2021 – Community Health Worker titles within the City of Austin. August 2021 - $500,000 in one-time funding for the creation of the CHW Network and Training. March 2022 – Austin Public Health approved for a certification training program for Community Health Workers. Community Health Worker and Community Health Worker Instructor Community Health Worker (CHW) • Liaison and trusted messenger • Advocates • Connects Community Health Worker Instructor (CHW-I) Trains other CHWs • 160 hr certification • Continuing Education course (CEU) Certification for Community Health Workers Who can be a Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) Certified Community Health Worker? Texas resident 16 yrs. old + Training • Class Instruction – Completion 160-hour approved class instruction OR • Experience – At least 1000 hrs. of CHW experience CHW Core Competencies Communication Skills Interpersonal Skills Service Coordination Skills Capacity-Building Skills Advocacy Skills Teaching Skills Organizational Skills Knowledge Base on Specific Health Issues Training for CHW Certification Option 1 - Class Instruction Option 2 - Experience • Approved DSHS training program • 160 hours • Virtual and In-person learning options OR • 1000 cumulative hours of community health work services • Within last three (3) years. • Experience verified with the supervisor(s) noted in the application. • Virtual Class – Tuesday & Thursdays, 5:30 pm – 8:00 pm • In-Person – Saturdays, 9:00 am – 3:00 pm • May 21st – September 10th Class Set Up • 2 cohorts Current Enrollment • Virtual – 21 • In-person – 19 Marketing Staffing • Current APH Instructors • Staffing Challenges 160 hr. training course • Word-of-Mouth from APH CHW Instructors • Promo Flyer • Total sign-ups for classes …
FY23 Cultural Funding Programs Update CITY OF AUSTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JUNE 28, 2022 Concerns of Inequitable Distribution* Problem: we are trying to address 50 years of inequitable distribution of funding through the Cultural Funding programs due to the historical policies, practices, and (in)accessibility of our programs. *Data shows leadership/staff demographics FY15-FY 21 only. We recognize this is only one indicator. Equitable Funding Review Goal The desired goal is to sustain and grow Austin’s cultural infrastructure so that all may share in the economic and employment benefits of the heritage preservation and creative sectors, as well as upholding the City’s commitment to racial equity per the City of Austin’s Equity Office standards and goals. Cultural Funding Review Process Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 4.5 Launch + Listen Record + Analyze Equity Audit 9 1 0 2 • 1 town hall • 2 workshops • 39 listening sessions • 540 participants • 1,160 engagement hours • Feedback compiled and synthesized • Organized into specific themes and directions for further discussion • Staff assessment of programs • Equity trainings for staff and commissions • Heritage Tourism and Music and Entertainment added • Process audit with ODD • MJR Recommendations Program Development • 1500+ hours of staff planning • 2 public presentations • Feedback: comment box, 1:1 meetings, Q+A, direct communications, Commission meetings 2 0 2 2 Program Refinement • 1 presentation • Regular VOOH and 3 guided discussions • Arts Commission chats • Feedback collection including survey • Feedback will be used to refine the program before official launch • Evaluation is ongoing! Feedback informed every aspect of program development including program priorities, application scoring, rubrics, and process improvements. Holistic Funding Ecosystem Nexus Nurture new and emerging applicants by funding creative public projects developed through community activation and/or collaboration. Elevate Creative and administrative expenses of cultural producers that amplify equity and prioritize inclusive programming. Thrive Focused investment to sustain and grow arts organizations that are deeply rooted in, and reflective of Austin’s diverse cultures. Pilot Program Nexus in Detail Goal Contract Term Type of Funding Who can apply? Selection Process Draft Total Available Funds Draft Award Amounts Draft Number of Awardees Individuals/ Groups* (*cooperatives, non-profit organizations, businesses, partnerships, etc.) Encourage new talent Nexus 6 Months Project Funding Only 3 COA Staff + Rubric ~$500,000 $5,000 100 (50 per cycle; 2 cycles/year) Pilot Program Elevate in Detail Elevate Elevate …
Exhibit A Item C-01 Housing Working Group For Planning Commission consideration, develop recommendations for changes to the City of Austin Land Development Code Chapter 25 that will increase housing availability in alignment with City of Austin Comprehensive Plan, to better meet the goals of Austin’s Strategic Housing Blueprint, and Austin Strategic Mobility Plan. Task Membership James Shieh Robert Schneider Carmen Llanes Pulido Greg Anderson Solveij Rosa Praxis Awais Azhar
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 3 CASE: C814-95-0001.02 – South Austin Medical Center ZONING FROM / TO: PUD-NP to PUD-NP, to change a condition of zoning ADDRESS: 901, 1001 West Ben White Boulevard, and 4210, 4214, 4300, 4302, 4304, 4306 James Casey Street SITE AREA: 17.30 acres PROPERTY OWNER: St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP, LLP (Mark Worsham) AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael Whellan) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment to planned unit development (PUD) district zoning as shown in the Revised Zoning Exhibit for the Proposed Height Increase (Attachment A). For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 2 and 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: June 28, 2022: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: July 28, 2022: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The Southwood Neighborhood Association supports the proposed PUD amendment. Please refer to correspondence attached to the back of this Staff report. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS TO THE STAFF REPORT: Exhibits A and A-1: Zoning Map and Aerial Applicant’s Summary Letter and Revised Zoning Exhibit for the Proposed Height Increase (Attachment A) 1998 Amended Land Use Plan (Attachment B), and Original and Amended PUD Ordinances (Attachment C) C814-95-0001.02 Page 2 Correspondence Received CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The South Austin Medical Center PUD is bounded by West Ben White Boulevard Eastbound Service Road and main lanes to the north, medical offices across James Casey Street to the east (LO-V-NP; LR-V-NP), medical offices to the south (GO-V-NP; LO-V-NP; LO-NP), and the Union Pacific Railroad tracks to the west. The PUD and surrounding properties to the east and south are located within the Hospital Special District established by the South Austin Combined (South Manchaca) Neighborhood Plan approved by Council in November 2014. Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and A-1 (Aerial View). The PUD was approved by Council in June 1996 and is limited to uses allowed in the general office (GO) zoning district, along with hospital services (general) as an additional permitted use of the property, and established specific development standards including height (C814- 95-0001). The first amendment to the PUD was approved by Council in October 1998 and resulted in the addition of three adjacent lots along James Casey Street. The purpose of the PUD amendment is to facilitate the creation of additional capacity for more than 140 hospital beds. Specifically, the proposed PUD amendment would increase the allowable height from 60 feet …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET DISTRICT: 3 CASE: C814-95-0001.02 – South Austin Medical Center ZONING FROM / TO: PUD-NP to PUD-NP, to change a condition of zoning ADDRESS: 901, 1001 West Ben White Boulevard, and 4210, 4214, 4300, 4302, 4304, 4306 James Casey Street SITE AREA: 17.30 acres PROPERTY OWNER: St. David’s Healthcare Partnership, LP, LLP (Mark Worsham) AGENT: Armbrust & Brown, PLLC (Michael Whellan) CASE MANAGER: Wendy Rhoades (512-974-7719, wendy.rhoades@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Staff recommendation is to grant an amendment to planned unit development (PUD) district zoning as shown in the Revised Zoning Exhibit for the Proposed Height Increase (Attachment A). For a summary of the basis of Staff’s recommendation, see pages 2 and 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: June 28, 2022: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: July 28, 2022: ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES: The Southwood Neighborhood Association supports the proposed PUD amendment. Please refer to correspondence attached to the back of this Staff report. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS TO THE STAFF REPORT: Exhibits A and A-1: Zoning Map and Aerial Applicant’s Summary Letter and Revised Zoning Exhibit for the Proposed Height Increase (Attachment A) 1998 Amended Land Use Plan (Attachment B), and Original and Amended PUD Ordinances (Attachment C) C814-95-0001.02 Page 2 Correspondence Received CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: The South Austin Medical Center PUD is bounded by West Ben White Boulevard Eastbound Service Road and main lanes to the north, medical offices across James Casey Street to the east (LO-V-NP; LR-V-NP), medical offices to the south (GO-V-NP; LO-V-NP; LO-NP), and the Union Pacific Railroad tracks to the west. The PUD and surrounding properties to the east and south are located within the Hospital Special District established by the South Austin Combined (South Manchaca) Neighborhood Plan approved by Council in November 2014. Please refer to Exhibits A (Zoning Map) and A-1 (Aerial View). The PUD was approved by Council in June 1996 and is limited to uses allowed in the general office (GO) zoning district, along with hospital services (general) as an additional permitted use of the property, and established specific development standards including height (C814- 95-0001). The first amendment to the PUD was approved by Council in October 1998 and resulted in the addition of three adjacent lots along James Casey Street. The purpose of the PUD amendment is to facilitate the creation of additional capacity for more than 140 hospital beds. Specifically, the proposed PUD amendment would increase the allowable height from 60 feet …
From: Michael Curry Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 5:09 PM To: Shaw, Todd - BC <BC-Todd.Shaw@austintexas.gov>; Schneider, Robert - BC <BC- Robert.Schneider@austintexas.gov>; Thompson, Jeffrey - BC <bc-Jeffrey.Thompson@austintexas.gov>; Praxis, Solveij - BC <BC-Solveij.Praxis@austintexas.gov>; Mushtaler, Jennifer - BC <BC- Jennifer.Mushtaler@austintexas.gov>; Hempel, Claire - BC <BC-Claire.Hempel@austintexas.gov>; Howard, Patrick - BC <BC-Patrick.Howard@austintexas.gov>; Llanes, Carmen - BC <bc- Carmen.Llanes@austintexas.gov>; Cox, Grayson - BC <BC-Grayson.Cox@austintexas.gov>; Azhar, Awais - BC <BC-Awais.Azhar@austintexas.gov>; Anderson, Greg - BC <bc-Greg.Anderson@austintexas.gov>; Flores, Yvette - BC <bc-Yvette.Flores@austintexas.gov>; Shieh, James - BC <bc- James.Shieh@austintexas.gov>; Singh, Arati - BC <BC-Arati.Singh@austintexas.gov> Cc: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov>; Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: June 28 Agenda Items 1 and 2 - NPA-2022-0027.01; C14-2022-0021 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Chairman Shaw and Commissioners, Please see the attached letter submitted on behalf of the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association. Greg Underwood, BWNA President, is out of town and asked me to file this with you. Thank you, Michael Curry -----Original Message----- From: A X Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 9:03 PM To: Meredith, Maureen <Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov> Subject: Case No NPA-2022-007.01 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Maureen - I’d like to lodge my objection to this rezoning request for 1809 W 35th Street. Given the significant development efforts in our area (Oakmont, Rosedale, Ridglea, etc), what is COA doing to ensure sufficient and sustainable infrastructure for the number of rezoning changes? The nearby Grove (mixed use) and Westminister developments have increased traffic and non-stop construction/noise for 2-3 years. Our neighborhoods are now more unsafe and less enjoyable than they were 10 years ago. Urban density does not lead to better and more affordable housing (see Austin, Seattle, and Portland as examples). Other than MEA Real Estate Ventures would like to make money, how does rezoning this property improve our neighborhood and quality of life? Thanks for listening, Angela
Potential Fare Programs Hispanic/Latino Quality of Life Resource Advisory Commission | June 28, 2022 Agency Core Values INNOVATION EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY TRANSPARENCY SAFETY 2 Agenda • Fare Strategy Review • Potential Fare Programs powered by Amp • Fare Capping • Equifare • Title VI Analysis • Community Engagement • Next Steps 3 Fare Strategy Review Addresses transit affordability and other population needs (i.e., low income and per Title VI, race, color, etc.) Incorporates alternative fare structures (e.g., capped fares for all riders) Supports equity in future fare adjustments in alignment with Project Connect Integrated Financial Model Equity CapMetro Fare Strategy Technology Encourages increased ridership while maintaining sustainable revenue stream Maintains and creates programs for various demographics (e.g., senior citizens, military, employer- sponsored, ILAs) Encourages contactless payments, other innovations and integrations 4 CapMetro wants to make our fares more equitable. We know that our customers pay for their transit passes one trip at a time instead of taking advantage of the savings that come with day or monthly passes. Proposed Fare Programs powered by Amp Fare Capping Equifare Fare capping limits how much you pay for all your trips in a day, week or month. An additional discounted fare category for income-eligible customers 5 What is Fare Capping? Fare capping limits how much you pay for all your trips in a day, week or month. Fare capping makes sure that customers: • Never pay more than the total cost of a Day Pass in a calendar day • Never pay more than the total cost of a monthly pass in a calendar month 6 Here's how fare capping works on MetroBus: When you pay for 2 single rides in one day, you earn a Daily Cap and ride free the rest of the day. Your daily spending is capped at $2.50 total! 7 Fare Capping - Monthly Cap When you pay for 33 single rides in a calendar month, you earn a Monthly Cap, and ride free the rest of the month. • Your monthly spending is capped at $41.25 total! • Monthly Cap • 33 Paid Rides • 17 Days of Riding • Benefit: ride free up to 14 days per calendar month 8 How to Get Fare Capping: Amp Account • Get Amp, by physical card or CapMetro App • Load money to your account - this is called stored value! • Tap your card or scan your app to …
To: Elon Musk 1 Tesla Road Austin, TX 78725 June 14, 2022 Communities Request Dialogue and Partnership from Tesla towards Sustainable Development in Del Valle Given that: Tesla’s arrival in 2020 – with significant tax abatements – was met with community optimism that the company would provide high quality jobs for residents of southeastern Travis County, along with many other hoped-for community benefits. Given that: Tesla has rapidly constructed one of the nation’s largest car factories east of Austin, adjacent to communities of color that have historically endured environmental injustices, making dialogue with Tesla’s neighbors all the more necessary. Given that: Tesla needs to have frequent and sufficient contact with the community most impacted by their project, and expectations that the company go beyond the limited requirements of their economic incentive deal with Travis County. THEREFORE, to address community concerns, we propose a series of public meetings with Tesla, in collaboration with Travis County and the City of Austin—in order to ultimately reach a written “contract with the community” that would help guide the company as it makes plans for corporate social responsibility programs in the future. Our coalition of groups, as the Tesla Outreach Community Alliance (or TOCA), has begun this process by laying out the following list of potential efforts we hope that Tesla would undertake, divided into four categories: On Labor • Develop plans to hire otherwise qualified people living near the plant who need language training or other language accommodations On Partnership • Develop plans – including job fairs – to hire people who do not have access to web recruiting tools • Improve plans to hire otherwise qualified people who are reentering from the criminal legal system • Establish a Community Advisory Panel of neighbors and grassroots groups • Report regular status updates to the public on the progress towards these community needs • Fund anti-displacement programs to support neighboring communities On the Environment On Infrastructure of Austin • Improve protection of water quality from stormwater runoff and hazardous waste, and ensure air quality is not degraded • Develop an ecological conservation and restoration plan for Tesla’s riverfront property, and plans for a community park • Enhance measures to mitigate flood risk for downstream communities • Help fund the extension of water and sewer pipelines to connect nearby neighborhoods to utility service from the City • Commit to the completion of the Harold Green Road …
PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD June 27, 2022 – 6:00 PM City Hall Chambers, Room 1001 301 W. Second Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Parks and Recreation Board will be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register call or email the board liaison at 512-974-6716 or Tim.Dombeck@austintexas.gov PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEMBERS: Laura Cottam Sajbel (D-9), Chair Sarah Faust (D-5), Vice-Chair Nina Rinaldi (D-1) Anna Di Carlo (D-2) Patrick Moore (D-3) Kathryn Flowers (D-4) Lisa Hugman (D-6) Nancy Barnard (D-7) AGENDA Kim Taylor (D-8) Dawn Lewis (D-10) Richard DePalma (Mayor) CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the Parks and Recreation Board regular meeting of May 23, 2022. B. NEW BUSINESS: PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS 1. Presentation, discussion and possible action on Permanent Wastewater Use and Temporary Work Area, not to exceed 600 Calendar Days on parkland located at Jimmy Clay Golf Course, Roy Kizer Golf Course, Onion Creek Soccer Complex, Onion Creek Metropolitan Park N. Entrance, and Onion Creek Metropolitan Park S. Entrance. Total Mitigation is $818,542. (SD23 Strategies: Govt that Works for All) Presenter(s): Brent Crawford, Project Manager, Austin Water 2. Briefing on Equity Office history, purpose, and updates on the work within the City and Parks and Recreation department. (Sponsors: DePalma) (SD23 Strategies: Economic Opportunity & Affordability, Health & Environment, Culture & Lifelong Learning, Govt that Works for All; PARD Long Range Strategies: Operational Efficiency, Park Access for All, Program Alignment) Page 1 of 2 3. Briefing on the progress of the draft Commercial Parkland Dedication Ordinance for commuters and associated community feedback and resources. (SD23 Strategies: Economic Opportunity & Affordability, Health & Environment, Culture & Lifelong Learning, Mobility, Govt that Works for All; PARD Long Range Strategies: Relief from Urban Life, Urban Public Spaces, Park Access for All) Presenter(s): Paul Books, Planner III, Robynne Heymans, …
Onion Creek Reclaimed Water Main Phase 1 (South Austin PARD areas) Parks & Recreation Board | June 27, 2022 Brent Crawford, EIT Austin Water What is Reclaimed Water? Benefits Reduces potable water demand Increases potable water savings Enhances water quality downstream of treatment plants Usage Irrigation Water Tower Cooling Manufacturing Toilet Flushing PARD Annual Irrigation Savings $1.44 million / 406 million gallons water saved Bartholomew District Park Morris Williams Golf Jimmy Clay Golf Course Govalle Neighborhood Course Onion Creek Metro Park Republic Square Roy G. Guerrero Metro Roy Kizer Golf Course Park Park Wooldridge Square Hancock Golf Course Onion Creek Reclaimed Main Phase 1 Nearly 3.5 miles of new reclaimed water main Sponsored by Austin Water, managed by Public Works $140,000 additional irrigation savings • Dove Springs ball and soccer fields • Onion Creek soccer complex • Onion Creek Metro Park Also serves public & private customers • Goodnight Ranch • Widen Elementary • Mendez Middle School Parkland Easements and Impacts Mitigation Overview Project Location: 5400 Jimmy Clay Drive thru 8652 Nuckols Crossing Road Austin, TX 78744 Easements needed in 5 parks 1.) Dove Springs Soccer Fields 2.) Clay- Kizer Golf Course 3.) Onion Creek Soccer Fields 4.) Onion Creek Metro Park (N. Entrance) 5.) Onion Creek Metro Park (S. Entrance) Construction duration = September 2022 to July 2024 Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) to be used for creek crossings (trenchless) Plans in place to mitigate impacts to park visitors All parkland will be restored to existing condition or better Dove Springs EASEMENTS NEEDED: Permanent Reclaimed Waterline: 0.610 acres Temporary Construction: 2.366 acres Usage • Staging Area (90 ft X 277 ft) • Access from George St. (45 ft X 300 ft) • HDD Staging Area (100 ft X 200 ft) IMPACTS MITIGATION: Pathway to be maintained to Recreation Center Permanent & Temporary Use Mitigation will not apply per PARD service request (No Ch.26) Jimmy Clay EASEMENTS NEEDED: Permanent Reclaimed Waterline: 0.909 acres Temporary Construction: 2.250 acres Usage: • Access from Jimmy Clay Dr. / HDD Staging Area (90 ft X 180 ft) IMPACTS MITIGATION: Traffic Control for Jimmy Clay Parking Lot Golf Cart Paths, Asphalt, Curb & Gutter of parking lot to be …
M E M O R A N D U M O F U N D E R S T A N D I N G M.O.U. # 22-003 Robert Goode, P.E. Interim Director, Austin Water Department Kimberly McNeeley, CPRP Director, Parks and Recreation Department TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Onion Creek Reclaimed Water Main DATE: Austin Water is allowed to use the parkland located at Jimmy Clay Golf Course, Roy Kizer Golf Course, Onion Creek Soccer Complex, Onion Creek Metropolitan Park (N. Entrance), and Onion Creek Metropolitan Park (S. Entrance) as indicated in the attachments. 6/15/2022 TCAD Value per Square Foot Area Required for Temporary Use (Square Feet) $8 $7 $7 98,010 253,020 107,208 Duration (days) Area Required for Permanent Use (Square Feet) Temporary Use Calculated Fee1 Permanent Use Calculated Fee2 90 60 60 39,596 30,928 29,550 $29,950 $44,631 $112,932 $76,377 $19,620 $75,711 $7 59,369 206 23,226 $35,228 $56,197 Parkland Jimmy Clay Golf Course Roy Kizer Golf Course Onion Creek Soccer Complex Onion Creek Metropolitan Park (N. Entrance) Onion Creek Metropolitan Park (S. Entrance) $10 144,521 662,128 184 600 51,836 175,136 $113,466 $242,894 Total: $185,792 $507,007 $749,902 [1] Includes 15% rate of return for temporary uses [2] Includes adjustment for 35% construction disturbance value based on limitations on future development of parkland. Roy Kizer Golf Course Revenue Mitigation Daily Rate $ $ 2,288 No. of Days Mitigation Amt. 30 68,640 Mitigation to be paid to PARD Golf Division = $332,530 (Clay/Kiser/Revenue loss) Mitigation to be paid to PARD = $486,014 (Onion Creek Soccer Complex, Onion Creek Metro N. Entrance, Onion Creek Metro S. Entrance) Total Mitigation Amount to be paid to PARD = $818,542 Extension/modification of parkland use must receive prior written approval from PARD. Additional fees will be assessed at the same daily rate as stated in Attachment “A” of this M.O.U. 1 of 2 Phone Number: 512-974-3542 Austin Water Department Point of Contact is: Brent Crawford Parks and Recreation Department Point of Contact is: Gregory Montes Phone Number: 512-974-9458 Parks & Recreation Board: City Council Approval: ____________________________________________________________ Kimberly McNeeley, CPRP Director, Parks and Recreation Department CONCURRENCE ____________________________________________________________ Robert Goode, P.E. Interim Director Director, Austin Water Date Date Attachment A: Mitigation Calculation Attachment B: Map Exhibit 2 of 2
Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGSLegendOnion Creek District Park Ph 1 (Existing-Reuse Main)Onion Creek District Park Ph 2 (Existing-Reuse Main)Onion Creek Phase 1 (Future Construction)Existing-Reuse MainOnion Creek Metro Park Development Reclaimed Waterlines¯0760380FeetCity of AustinReclaimed Water ProgramNuckols Crossing Rd16"16"8"8"8"
ATTACHMENT "A" - MOU MITIGATION FEES CALCULATION WORKSHEET - SUMMARY Project: Onion Creek Reclaimed Water Line MOU # 22-003 Parkland Jimmy Clay Golf Course Roy Kizer Golf Course Onion Creek Soccer Complex Onion Creek Metropolitan Park (N. Entrance) Onion Creek Metropolitan Park (S. Entrance) [1] Includes 15% rate of return for temporary uses TCAD Value per Square Foot $8 $7 $7 $7 $10 Area Required for Temporary Use (Square Feet) 98,010 253,020 107,208 59,369 144,521 662,128 Duration (days) Area Required for Permanent Use (Square Feet) Temporary Use Calculated Fee1 Permanent Use Calculated Fee2 Golf Course Revenue Mitigation 90 60 60 206 184 600 39,596 30,928 29,550 23,226 51,836 175,136 $29,950 $44,631 $19,620 $35,228 $113,466 $242,894 $112,932 $76,377 $75,711 $56,197 $185,792 $507,007 Total: $68,640 $68,640 $818,542 [2] Includes adjustment for 35% construction disturbance value based on limitations on future devevelopment for that portion of parkland (see tab for Disturbance Value Table) [3] Golf Course Revenue Mitigation (Daily Rate $2,288) x (No. Days 30) Jimmy Clay Golf Course Property ID Land Value 295484 295485 295486 295487 Avg Square Feet 7,517 7,361 7,224 7,350 7,363 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Avg/SF $8 Roy Kizer Golf Course Property ID Land Value 296185 296184 296183 296182 Avg Square Feet 13,464 7,396 6,534 6,621 8,504 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Avg/SF $7 Onion Creek Soccer Complex Property ID Land Value 296379 296378 296377 296376 Avg Square Feet 6,356 7,505 8,124 11,620 8,401 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $66,000 $61,500 Avg/SF $7 Onion Creek Metro Park N. Entrance Property ID Land Value 556062 556061 556017 556018 Avg Square Feet 8,757 9,109 10,002 6,849 8,679 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 Avg/SF $7 Onion Creek Metro Park S. Entrance Property ID Land Value 774096 774097 774040 774041 Avg Square Feet 5,171 5,933 8,005 4,620 5,932 $60,000 $60,000 $63,000 $60,000 $60,750 Avg/SF $10 Disturbance Values Area can still be developed with minimal or no limitations (underground work/materials with no/few above ground appurtenances/fixtures) Area can still be developed with moderate limitations (underground work/materials with some small/medium appurtenances/fixtures) Development severely limited (underground work/materials with large or several small/medium appurtenances/fixtures) No future park development possible in the area - dedicated to installation (underground and/or surface appurtenances/fixtures) 35% 50% 75% 100%
History of Equity Office & PARD Efforts In 2015: Austin is the best place to live in the nation according to U.S. News and World Report & One of the most economically segregated cities in the U.S. according to the Martin Prosperity Institute Community Organized for Accountability And Led To… • In 2015, Council passed a resolution creating the Equity Office to administer an Equity Tool • After an extensive search and interview process, Chief Equity Officer Brion Oaks was hired in October 2016 “Maintaining the Spirit of the Resolution” • Brion intentionally followed the resolution, engaging the community whose organizing resulted in the Office • Co-created the Equity Assessment Tool, and defined “equity” for the City of Austin • Volunteers dedicated over 900 hours in the process 5 City Equity Definition Racial equity is the condition when race no longer predicts a person’s quality of life outcomes in our community. The City recognizes that race is the primary determinant of social equity and therefore we begin the journey toward social equity with this definition. The City of Austin recognizes historical and structural disparities and a need for alleviation of these wrongs by critically transforming its institutions and creating a culture of equity. A Framework for Equity Equity Lens What do you know about the racial history of Austin? Indigenous Peoples and Land Indigenous Peoples and Land Acknowledging How We Got Here Inheriting inequality “As greater Austin booms, the poisonous legacy of segregation continues to cut off the African-American population from economic opportunities and its own cultural anchors, threatening the whole region's potential.” -An American-Statesmanthree-part series http://projects.statesman.com/news/economic-mobility/ 1928 Plan “There has been considerable talk in Austin, as well as other cities, in regard to the race segregation problem. This problem cannot be solved legally under any zoning law known to us at present. Practically all attempts of such have been unconstitutional.” pg. 66 First Ward Boundaries of Austin’s First Ward or “Austin’s Mexico” 6th Street to the North Colorado River to the South Congress Avenue to the East Rio Grande Street to the West Many families settled along Shoal Creek Creating the “Negro District” A New Deal program was proposed that would reinforce segregationist boundaries in Austin and throughout the country. The program, designed to restore household wealth during the Great Depression, used redlining -- the practice of denying goods or services to racially determined neighborhoods -- to specifically exclude …
