All documents

RSS feed for this page

Zoning and Platting CommissionApril 2, 2024

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Regular Meeting ZONING & PLATTING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 2, 2024 The Zoning & Platting Commission convened in a meeting on Tuesday, April 2, 2024 @ http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Chair Smith called the Commission Meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Commission Members in Attendance: Scott Boone Alejandra Flores - Parliamentarian William D. Floyd Dave Fouts Kendra Garrett Betsy Greenberg – Vice-Chair Ryan Puzycki Hank Smith – Chair Lonny Stern Absent Carrie Thompson - Secretary 2 Vacancies on the dais. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES The first four (4) speakers signed up prior to the speaker registration deadline will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. Approval of minutes of the Zoning and Platting Commission regular meeting on March 12, 2024. Approval of minutes of the Zoning and Platting Commission regular meeting on March 12, 2024 was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Flores, seconded by Vice-Chair Greenberg on a vote of 10-0. Commissioner Thompson absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Rezoning: C14-2023-0009 - 10931 Stonelake Blvd. Multifamily; District 7 Location: 10931 Stonelake Boulevard, Walnut Creek Owner/Applicant: Susan Kline Morehead, Katherine F. Manninen, and Lucian K. Morehead Agent: Dubois Bryant & Campbell, LLP (David Hartman) Request: LI to LI-PDA Staff Rec.: Recommended Staff: Sherri Sirwaitis, 512-974-3057, sherri.sirwaitis@austintexas.gov Planning Department Public Hearing closed. Motion to grant Staff’s recommendation of LI-PDA combining district zoning for 10931 Stonelake Boulevard located at 10931 Stonelake Boulevard was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Flores, seconded by Vice-Chair Greenberg on a vote of 10-0. Commissioner Thompson absent. 3. Rezoning: C14-2023-0155 - 2103 Oak Valley Rd; District 5 Location: 2103 Oak Valley Road, Slaughter Creek Watershed Owner/Applicant: Eddie & Leila Mayfield Agent: Keepers Land Planning (Ricca Keepers) Request: I-RR to SF-3 Staff Rec.: Staff Recommendation SF-1 Staff: Cynthia Hadri, 512-974-7620, cynthia.hadri@austintexas.gov Planning Department Motion to grant Applicant’ request for postponement of this item to May 21, 2024 was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Flores, seconded by Vice-Chair Greenberg on a vote of 10-0. Commissioner Thompson absent. 4. CUP: SPC-2023-0033C - Project Connect Expo Center Park & Ride; District 1 Location: 7001 Decker Ln, Elm Creek Owner/Applicant: Cap Metro - Robert Chaney Agent: MWM Design Group - Shari Pape Request: This site is zoned P (Public) and is greater than one acre in size; therefore, a Conditional Use Permit is …

Scraped at: Aug. 1, 2024, 7:30 p.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

1. 2. REGULAR CALLED MEETING of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION April 1, 2024 at 4:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM #1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the Public Safety Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Christi Vitela, 512- 974-2792, christi.vitela@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Nelly Paulina Ramírez, Chair Rebecca Bernhardt, Vice Chair Cory Hall-Martin Paul Hermesmeyer David Holmes Pierre Nguyễn Kristy Orr Angelica Reyes Timothy Ruttan Yasmine Smith AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first five speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the Public Safety Commission regular meeting on March 4, 2024. DISCUSSION ITEMS Public Safety Quarterly Report, Austin Police Department 3. 4. Overview of Downtown Austin Community Court and Mobile Court Pilot Program from Robert Kingham, Court Administrator and Christopher Anderson, Court Operations Manager. Update on the Biannual Wildfire Readiness provided by Division Chief Carrie Stewart and Wildfire Mitigation Officer Justice Jones of the Austin Fire Department. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS Conduct officer elections for the Chair and Vice Chair. 5. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 6. CSCRM Joint Working Group update on Commission for Women's recommendation and status. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Christi Vitela at the Office of the City Clerk Department, at 512-974-2792 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Public Safety Commission, please contact Christi Vitela at (512-974- 2792 or christi.vitela@austintexas.gov).

Scraped at: March 27, 2024, 2:10 p.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Special Called Meeting of the Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee April 1, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. Permitting and Development Center (PDC) – Room #2103 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee may be participating in the video conference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in-person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To at 512-974-7288 or email Jordan.Feldman@austintexas.gov. Jordan Feldman, the board call or register, liaison, CURRENT COMMITTEE MEMBERS Claire Hempel (Chair) Alejandra Flores (Vice-Chair) Greg Anderson Awais Azhar Betsy Greenberg Felicity Maxwell Lonny Stern CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers signed up prior to commencement of the meeting will be allowed to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the March 20, 2024, meeting minutes. 1 DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. C20-2022-003 South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program. Discussion and possible action to recommend amendments to City Code Title 25 to create a new zoning district and modify related site development regulations and compatibility standards; and create a new zoning district for density bonus that includes granting additional floor-to-area ratio in exchange for providing community benefits; and to establish boundaries for the new zoning districts located in the vicinity commonly known as the South Central Waterfront. City Staff: Erica Leak, Planning Department, (512) 974-9375, Erica.Leak@austintexas.gov. 3. C20-2023-045 Site Plan Lite Phase 2 and Infill Plats. Discussion and possible action to recommend amendments to City Code Title 25 related to development regulations applicable to residential re- subdivisions and multi-family residential site development of five to sixteen units. City Staff: Brent Lloyd, Development Services Department, (512) 974-2974, Brent.Lloyd@austintexas.gov. 4. Update on Potential Upcoming and Active Code Amendments: City Staff: Jordan Feldman, Planning Department, (512) 974-7288, Jordan.Feldman@austintexas.gov, and Paul Books, Planning Department, (512) 974-3173, Paul.Books@austintexas.gov. DISCUSSION ITEMS FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. …

Scraped at: March 27, 2024, 4:50 p.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item2_HighlightsSouthCentralWaterfrontChangeLog_3.27.24 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Key Adjustments to the South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program March 27, 2024 The South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus program underwent a one-month public input process. As a result, feedback was provided by community members, Boards and Commissions, staff, and other stakeholders. Staff consolidated and assessed the feedback to determine recommended adjustments to the draft code for the South Central Waterfront. The following is a list of the key changes made in the draft code as a result of the discussion, using the following key as the source of the adjustment: Boards and Commissions, Public Input, and/or Staff. Key: Source of Input Boards and Commissions Public Staff District Boundary and Subdistricts Source Adjustment Section 1.2 Section 3.3.2 District boundaries were further expanded to include three properties on the western side of the South Central Waterfront. See the updated map for detail. To underscore the commitment to transit-oriented development in the area, the FAR was adjusted to properties near to the proposed Project Connect station on the north side of East Riverside Drive. See the updated map for detail. Height limits have been added to Subdistricts 1 through 4. They are: 1 - 120', 2 - 240', 3 - 300', 4 - 600'. Subdistrict 5 remains with unlimited height. This adjustment reinforces and improves the density gradient from the closest areas to downtown being the most dense, and for the density to transition down as one moves further away from downtown. Section 3.3.2 - 1 - Land Use Source Adjustment Cocktail Lounges above 3,500sf in size will trigger the need for a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit process will better assist in the review and regulation of entertainment / nightlife noise disturbances. The Custom Manufacturing land use has been limited to 2,500sf. The limitation will deter larger single-purpose land uses and encourage more flexible development that supports smaller creative businesses. Section 2.3.1(C)(4) Section 2.3.1(D)(1) Adjustment Section 2.7(C) Section 4.4.3 Shade provisions increased for cantilevered, affixed, and freestanding options. Trees will still be the dominant shade mechanism, but this change allows for strong urban design and diversity in design of the urban space. This is also consistent with activities in other urban areas in the city. An additional internal circulation route type with a bicycle lane was added. This addition increases bicycle connectivity within the South Central Waterfront area and facilitates safe separation of …

Scraped at: March 28, 2024, 9:50 p.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item2_SCWAdoptionPresentation_COJC original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program COJC April 1, 2024 South Central Waterfront Vision Framework Plan Adopted June 6, 2016 City Council Resolution 20220915-090 Initiated the creation of an “Optional Regulating Plan” later changed to a Combining District and Density Bonus Program. 2 Approach Since Council Resolution  The SCW regulations will be implemented by: – Council adoption of an optional set of regulations and bonus program through the creation of a Combining District and a Density Bonus Program (spring 2024). – City-initiated rezoning of non PDA, PUD, and Planned Development Agreement properties in the district (summer 2024).  First reevaluation within 1-2 years. 3 District Boundary Expansion 4 Combining District Density Bonus General Provisions (Policies, procedures, and who can participate) Land Use Standards (Permitted and conditional land uses) Development Standards (What can be built and where) Design Standards (How it will look) Definitions Procedures/Requirements “Gate Keeper” Requirements – – – Affordable Housing Environmental Protection Improved Streetscape and Built Environment In-Lieu Fees and Dedications On-Site Community Benefits Eligible for Bonus Area 5 5 Subdistricts and FAR Council approval is required to exceed FAR maximums and heights Density Distribution Areas (DDAs) • FAR maximums apply to each DDA separately. • No larger than 90,000 sq. ft. • Internal circulation routes required along DDA divisions. Project Connect Rail Alignment 6 Bonus Program Structure (For Additional FAR Beyond Base) Gate Keeper Requirements Onsite Affordable Housing (Fee for Non-Residential) Enhanced Environmental Protections Streetscape & Built Environment First Then (To Reach Up to FAR / Height Subdistrict Maximums) 70% In-Lieu Fees & Dedications Affordable Housing (extra on-site affordable units credited; Affordable Housing Investment Area) Parks (dedications credited; boundary as defined by typical Parks fees) Infrastructure (supports SCW directly) 30% On-Site Community Benefits *Affordable Creative Space Open Space & Park Buildout Child / Adult Care Cultural Uses Transit-Supportive Infrastructure Grocery Store Music Venues Public Art 7 Affordable Housing 5% of housing on-site up to 3:1 FAR must be affordable. May be: At full buildout, it is estimated: The SCW Bonus Program could produce – Affordable rental units at 60% MFI, – Or if Condos: 481 On-site Affordable Units compared to – Affordable ownership units (condos) at 80% MFI, or – A fee-in-lieu for ownership units. 527 Affordable Units anticipated in the 2016 Vision Plan. 8 ^ *For artistic rendering purposes only ^ Required dispersion of affordable units throughout the residential units Key* Recommended …

Scraped at: March 28, 2024, 9:50 p.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item2_SCWCombiningDistrictDBP-StaffReport original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

C20-2022-003 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET C20-2022-003 South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program. Amendment: Description: Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending City Code Title 25 to create a new zoning district and modify related site development regulations and compatibility standards; and create a new zoning district for density bonus that includes granting additional floor-to-area ratio in exchange for providing community benefits; to establish boundaries for the new zoning districts located in the vicinity commonly known as the South Central Waterfront; and initiating zoning and rezoning for all properties within the South Central Waterfront District except those with Planned Unit Development zoning, Planned Development Area zoning, and subject to Planned Development Agreement, and initiate necessary neighborhood plan amendments for the properties located in the new zoning district’s boundaries. Background: On June 16, 2016, the South Central Waterfront Vision Framework Plan (Vision Plan) was adopted as an amendment to the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. As defined in the Vision Plan, the South Central Waterfront district encompasses roughly 118 acres. The intent of the Vision Plan was to leverage forecasted development through a districtwide approach that creates a dynamic people-centered district in Central Austin by: - Establishing a lively, attractive pedestrian environment; - Expanding open space and creating great public places; - Enhancing connections to and along the waterfront; and - Providing 20% new affordable housing units, or approximately 527 affordable units in the district. A districtwide approach had been identified as an essential method in realizing the intent of the Vision Plan. Through this approach, the South Central Waterfront is hoped to become a model for how a districtwide green infrastructure system, paired with quality urban design, can provide an interconnected network of public spaces – streets, streetscapes, lakeside trails, and parks – that provides the framework for redevelopment and districtwide value capture to fund other community benefits, such as affordable housing. The urban development envisioned in the Vision Plan requires modifications to the existing zoning and development regulations. To support the development envisioned in the Vision Plan, the City Council passed Resolution Number 20220915-090 on September 15, 2022, to initiate the development of regulations for the South Central Waterfront area. In the resolution, Council asked staff to create regulations that consider today’s market realities, anticipate future demand, and realize the intent of the Vision Plan to: 1 C20-2022-003 - Create a density bonus program “akin” to …

Scraped at: March 28, 2024, 9:50 p.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item2_SCWCombiningDistrictDensityBonusProgram(Pre-adoptionDraft) original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 49 pages

SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM DRAFT – March 27, 2024 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF AUSTIN Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 1 of 49 This page intentionally left blank. Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 2 of 49 Contents BACKGROUND. .............................................................................................................................................. 6 USING THIS DOCUMENT. .............................................................................................................................. 8 Applicability............................................................................................................................................... 8 Organization .............................................................................................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS. ............................................................................................................. 10 1.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Applicability. ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1. Conflicting Provisions. ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3. Application and Review Requirements. ........................................................................................... 11 1.3.1. Development Services Department Director’s Administration. ............................................... 11 1.4. Text, Graphics, and Maps. ................................................................................................................ 11 1.5. Density Bonus Program Evaluation. ................................................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 2: LAND USE STANDARDS. ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Applicability. ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Land Uses. ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1. Permitted (P), Permitted with Conditions (PC), and Conditional Uses (C). .............................. 12 2.3.2. Pedestrian-Oriented Building Frontage Uses. ........................................................................... 16 ARTICLE 3: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. .................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2. South Central Waterfront Overlays. ................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1. Waterfront Overlay (WO) Combining District. ........................................................................... 17 3.2.2. South Shore Subdistrict. ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2.3. Travis Heights Subdistrict. ......................................................................................................... 18 3.2.4. Auditorium Shores Subdistrict. .................................................................................................. 18 3.3. Allowed Density. .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.3.1. Units per Acre. .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.2. Floor-to-Area Ratios by Subdistrict. .......................................................................................... 18 3.3.3. Lot Size. ..................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.4. Impervious Cover and Building Coverage. ................................................................................ 20 3.4. Building Setbacks ............................................................................................................................. 20 3.5. Floor-to-Area Ratio Calculation. ...................................................................................................... 21 Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 3 of 49 3.5.1. Density Distribution Areas. ....................................................................................................... 21 3.5.2. Floor-to-Area Ratio Calculation for Structured Parking. ........................................................... 22 3.5.3. Floor-to-Area Ratio and Dedication of Land. ............................................................................ 22 3.6. Parking. ............................................................................................................................................ 22 3.6.1. Vehicle Parking .......................................................................................................................... 22 3.6.2. Bicycle Parking. ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.7. Required Open Space. ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.8. Compatibility Standards. .................................................................................................................. 24 ARTICLE 4: DESIGN STANDARDS ................................................................................................................. 25 4.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2. Streetscape & Built Environment Requirements. ............................................................................ 25 4.3. Right of Way Standards. ................................................................................................................... 25 4.4. Internal Circulation Routes. ............................................................................................................. 25 4.4.1. Internal Circulation Route Option 1: ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.2. Internal Circulation Route Option 2: ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.3. Internal Circulation Route Option 3: ......................................................................................... 26 4.4.4. Internal Circulation Route Option 4: ......................................................................................... 27 4.5. Supplemental Zones......................................................................................................................... 27 4.5.1. Supplemental Zone Standards. ................................................................................................. 27 ARTICLE 5: DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................. 29 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM .................................................................... 30 1. Intent. .................................................................................................................................................. 30 2. Applicability. ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3. Program Overview. ............................................................................................................................. 30 4. South Central Waterfront Subdistricts …

Scraped at: March 28, 2024, 9:50 p.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

SPECIAL CALLED MEETING of the SOUTH-CENTRAL WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD MONDAY, APRIL 1, 2024 AT 6:00PM Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Room 1405 Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the BOARD/COMMISSION may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely or to listen in on the meeting, call or email Margaret Shaw at (512)-974-6497 margaret.shaw@austintexas.gov or Aaron D. Jenkins (512) 974-7756 aaron.jenkins@austintexas.gov CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Jim Stephenson, Chair Felicity Maxwell, Vice Chair Conners Ladner, Board Member David Sullivan, Board Member Julia Woods, Board Member Stephanie Bazan, Board Member Isaac Cohen, Board Member Ryan Puzycki, Board Member Vacant , South River City Neighborhood Association Rebecca Edwards, Ex Officio (Housing) Dewitt Peart, Ex Officio(Downtown Austin Alliance) Matiur Rahman, Ex Officio (Transportation) Hopie Martinez, Ex Officio (Financial Services - Real Estate) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the South-Central Waterfront Advisory Board (SCWAB) Regular Meeting of the March 18, 2024 DISCUSSION Discussion on staff presentation on South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program Draft dated March 27, 2024 by April Geruso of the City of Austin Planning Department. DISCUSSION AND ACTION Discussion and action to recommend amendments to the proposed South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Margaret Shaw at the Economic Development Department, at (512)-974-6497 or margaret.shaw@austintexas.gov, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the South-Central Waterfront Advisory Board, please contact Margaret Shaw at the Economic Development Department, at (512)-974-6497 margaret.shaw@austintexas.gov or Aaron D. …

Scraped at: March 29, 2024, 10:30 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

March Drafted Meeting Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

1. SOUTH-CENTRAL WATERFRONT ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MARCH 18, 2024, AT 7:00PM The South Central Waterfront Advisory Board convened the Regular Meeting at the Permitting and Development Center, Room 1405, 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, TX 78752 in a hybrid format. BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Jim Stephenson, Chair David Sullivan DeWitt Peart, Ex-Officio BOARD MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE REMOTELY: Julia Woods Felicity Maxwell, Vice Chair Isaac Cohen Stephanie Bazan Ryan Puzycki Conner Ladner Hopie Martinez, Ex-Officio Absent Matiur Rahman, Ex-Officio Rebecca Edwards, Ex-Officio CALL TO ORDER Chair J. Stephenson called the Meeting to order at 7:01 pm. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the South-Central Waterfront Advisory Board (SCWAB) Regular Meeting of the February 22, 2024 The motion to approve the minutes was made by Board Member D. Sullivan, seconded by Vice Chair F. Maxwell and approved by a vote of (8-0). DISCUSSION 2. Discussion on a presentation on redevelopment plans for 500 South Congress in a Planned Unit Development (PUD) application by Michael Iannacone of The Related Companies, L.P. Michael Iannacone, Executive Vice President, and Dawood Rouben, Vice President, of The Related Companies, L.P. briefed the Board on redevelopment plans for 500 South Congress through a powerpoint presentation and video. No action was taken 3. Discussion on the proposed South Central Waterfront Combining District with a Density Bonus Program. Public speaker Maureen Powers from Texas Audubon Society requested SCWAB consider including in their recommendation “bird safe design” and other elements that support biodiversity in SCW District. No action was taken. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Special called meeting on April 1, 2024 for Board action on Combining District and Density Bonus Program from City Planning Department staff (Chair Stephenson, Vice Chair Maxwell) Updates from Working Groups (Chair Stephenson, Vice Chair Maxwell) ADJOURNMENT Chair J. Stephenson adjourned the meeting at 8:13 pm.

Scraped at: March 29, 2024, 10:30 a.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item3_StaffReport_InfillPlatsSPLitePt2 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET C20-2023-045 Amendment: C20-2023-045 Site Plan Lite Phase 2 & Infill Plats Description: These proposed amendments to respond to separate council initiatives: Resolution No. 20221201-048 (“Site Plan Lite”) and Resolution No. 20230504-023 (“Infill Plats”). The amendments, which will be included in a single ordinance, facilitate development of missing middle housing. Background: — Site Plan Lite Phase 2 On December 1, 2022, City Council approved Resolution No. 20221201-048 initiating Land Development Code (“LDC”) amendments to facilitate the creation of missing middle housing by scaling site plan review requirements for residential projects of three to sixteen units. As Phase 1 of the project, Council adopted Ordinance No. 20230720-158 on July 20, 2023, creating a site plan exemption for projects having four or fewer residential units. For a few months following passage of the ordinance, DSD required projects utilizing the new process to obtain formal “site plan exemptions,” which is an added step beyond obtaining a residential building permit. Following passage of the initial HOME amendments, which modified the definition of “multi-family,” DSD now routes projects of one to three units directly to residential review without requiring a site plan exemption. These proposed amendments would complete Council’s direction from Resolution No. 20221201-048 by establishing a more streamlined review process for projects of 5 to 16 units located on a single lot. — Infill Plats On May 4, 2023, Council approved Resolution No. 20230504-023 initiating LDC amendments to facilitate the creation of infill lots within existing residential subdivisions, with the goal of expanding opportunities for “fee simple” ownership and easing the impact of non-zoning regulations on residential re-subdivisions. The proposed amendments would achieve this objective by modifying non-zoning regulations for infill development, thereby establishing a more streamlined review process. Summary of Proposed Code Amendment: Below is a general summary of amendments proposed to implement the Infill Plat and Site Plan Lite resolutions. Modified Drainage Regulations Background LDC Sec. 25-8-211(B)(3) exempts development with up to 8,000 square feet of impervious cover from the requirement to provide water quality controls on sites located outside of the Barton Springs Zone. However, the code provides no similar exemption for drainage regulations. This means that I. — 1 infill re-subdivisions and small-scale site plans are required to meet detention standards similar to those required for large-scale multi-family and commercial projects. The proposed amendments would tailor drainage regulations more closely to the scale and intensity of residential …

Scraped at: March 29, 2024, 12:20 p.m.
Music CommissionApril 1, 2024

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

REGULAR MEETING of the MUSIC COMMISSION April 1, 2024, 6:30PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ROOM 1001, 301 W 2ND STREET, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Music Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Shelbi Mitchell, 512-974-6318, Shelbi.Mitchell@austintexas.gov. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS/COMMISSIONERS: Nagavalli Medicharla - Chair, Anne-Charlotte Patterson – Vice Chair, Oren Rosenthal – Parliamentarian, Nelson Aguilar, Tami Blevins, Pedro Carvalho, Leonard Davila, Lauryn Gould, Jonathan “Chaka” Mahone, Celeste Quesada, Scott Strickland, CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA Approve the minutes of the Music Commission Meeting on March 4, 2024. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff presentation on land use by Donald Jackson, Business Process Consultant, Economic Development Department. Live Music Fund collections update by Kim McCarson, Program Manager, Music & Entertainment Division, Economic Development Department. 3. 4. 5. Update on consultant evaluation of the FY23 Live Music Fund Event Program by Erica Shamaly, Division Manager, Music & Entertainment Division. Update on FY24 Austin Live Music Fund guidelines by Erica Shamaly, Division Manager, Music & Entertainment Division. DISCUSSION ITEMS 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 13. Update on SXSW Fair Pay by Aaron Lack, Austin Federation of Musicians Local. Presentation on Besame Mucho Festival by Circuit of the Americas representative. Discussion on booking for live music venues. Update on Downtown Commission recommendations to council on Red River Cultural District Funding and Convention Center expansion community oversight, by Vice Chair Patterson. Update on live musical performances for Music Commission meetings by Shelbi Mitchell, Program Coordinator, Music & Entertainment, Economic Development Department. Discussion regarding all ages shows and how the City of Austin supports youth in Austin. 11. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 12. Approve recommendation for sound assessment and disclosure requirements for residential development near Outdoor Music Venues and Performance Venues by Brian Block, Nightlife & Entertainment Services Manager, Development Services Department. Approve recommendation for Hotel Occupancy Tax collection from unlicensed Short Term Rentals (STR) and additional cultural funding via STR platforms following update on joint Urban Core Land Use Working Group …

Scraped at: March 29, 2024, 11 p.m.
Music CommissionApril 1, 2024

Supporting Documents original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

Live Music Venue and Creative Space Regulatory Incentives Phase II April 2024 Council Actions Resolution No. 20220728-094:  Establish the criteria to be a Live Music Venue  Create live music venue bonus and incentive program for new and existing venues,  Initiate changes to Land Development Code Section 25 Resolution No. 20220901-089:  Develop and adopt clear creative space land use definitions  Create creative space bonus and incentive program for new and existing including venues  Create new code elements to "Diversify, sustain, and cultivate the city's culture, music, and arts communities and industries“  Criteria for designation of Arts Districts  Initiate changes to Land Development Code Section 25 Resolution No. 20230921-102:  Develop LDC amendments with incentives for cultural space preservation and creation by Spring 2024  Bring an ordinance establishing a Cultural District Overlay initiated in Resolution No. 20220728-094 and Resolution No. 20220901-089 by Spring 2024 Guidance from Resolutions Resolution No. 20220728-094:  Fee Waivers  Modified Parking requirements  Expanded facilitation of affordable commercial space... in new construction  Prioritization of music venue or creative space as a community benefit for density bonuses or other overlays within the Red River Cultural District, East 6th Street Entertainment District, and Warehouse Entertainment District Resolution No. 20220901-089:  Fee waivers  Modified parking requirements  Expedited permitting process  "increase in floor to area ratio (FAR) in square footage or other appropriate development incentive related to what is provided for the dedicated creative space"  "Prioritization of creative space as a city-wide community benefit as it relates to density bonus programs, Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning, or within other regulatory plans  Increased flexibility in development regulations and opportunities for modification of policies, rules, codes, or design standards  Permit accessory use as a theater, art gallery, or art workshop in all commercial and industrial/warehousing zoning districts Goals and Timeline Goals  Develop a paper district that is not mapped; no change to a property’s zoning will be made through initial district adoption  Aggressive timeline to meet Spring goal  After adoption, owners of eligible properties may then request a rezoning to incorporate “Creative District (CD)” code string Milestones  Arts Commission: March 18 present  Music Commission: April 1  Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee (COJC): March 20  Recommended for adoption through unanimous vote of members  City Council Set Date: April 18 (May …

Scraped at: March 29, 2024, 11 p.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Draft Meeting Minutes March 4, 2024 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Public Safety Commission Meeting Minutes Monday, March 4, 2024 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES Monday, March 4, 2024 The Public Safety Commission convened in a regular called meeting on Monday, March 4, 2024, at City Hall Building, Boards and Commissions Room, 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Ramírez called the Public Safety Commission Meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Nelly Paulina Ramírez, Chair Rebecca Bernhardt, Vice-Chair David Holmes Pierre Nguyễn Kristy Orr Angelica Reyes Timothy Ruttan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Yasmine Smith PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Stephanie Ryan – support for APD Ruth Moonesinghe – death of her son, Raj Moonesinghe Carlos Leon – APD and CapMetro complaints APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Public Safety Commission regular meeting on February 5, 2024. The minutes from the meeting of 02/05/2024, were approved on Commissioner Bernhardt’s motion, Commissioner Nguyễn’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Hall-Martin and Hermesmeyer were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation by Teresa Gardner, Austin Travis County Emergency Medical Services (ATCEMS) Chief of Staff regarding the Austin Travis County EMS Quarterly Report. 1 Public Safety Commission Meeting Minutes Monday, March 4, 2024 Presentation was given by Stephen White, Acting Assistant Chief of Integrated Services. 3. Presentations by Chief of Staff Jeff Greenwalt, Austin Police Department; Chief of Staff Teresa Gardner, Austin Travis County Emergency Medical Services; and Chief of Staff Rob Vire, Austin Fire Department; Texas Harm Reduction Alliance and Vocal Texas on opioid use hot spots, prevention, and education efforts. Presentations were given by Stephen White, EMS Acting Assistant Chief of Integrated Services; Angela Carr, EMS Division Chief; Mike Sasser, EMS Captain; Cate Graziani, Vocal Texas; and Gaby Libretti, Texas Harm Reduction Alliance. Commissioner Smith requested EMS follow up to include: -geographical locations of the Pop Up Resource Clinics (PURC) and their outreach strategies -a map of the interventions administered through the Buprenorphine Bridge Program (BBP) -zip code data for where the rescue kits are distributed and where Narcan is administered prior to EMS arrival -data included on the Austin Public Health Opioid Overdose Dashboard for overdose calls that result in an arrest 4. Presentations by Chief of Staff Jeff Greenwalt, Austin Police Department; Chief of Staff Teresa Gardner, Austin Travis County Emergency Medical Services; and Chief of Staff Rob Vire, Austin Fire Department regarding electronic payroll system rollout. Presentations were given by Jeff Greenwalt, Chief of Staff, …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #2 Public Safety Quarterly Report - APD original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 19 pages

Austin Police Department Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Presentation • • • Section 1: Crimes Against Persons Section 4: Community Engagement Section 2: Crimes Against Property/Society Section 5: Budget Section 3: Response Times & Call Volumes Section 6: Staffing & Vacancies • • • APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit Slide 1 Crimes Against Persons by Offense Type FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 | FY2024 Q2* vs. 5-Year Mean (Q2) Crimes Against Persons Offense Type 5-Year Mean (FY2019-2023 Q2) FY2023 Q2 FY2024 Q2* 1-Year Change Difference from 5-Year Mean Assault Offenses (13A, 13B, 13C) 4,477 4,233 3,500 Homicide Offenses (09A, 09B) Kidnapping/Abduction (100) Sex Offenses (11A, 11B, 11C, 11D, 36A, 36B) Other Crimes Against Persons (64A, 64B) 16 46 232 3 22 52 202 3 12 46 148 1 -17% -45% -12% -27% -67% Total Crimes Against Persons 4,774 4,512 3,707 -18% -22% *Data for FY2024 Q2 only available through March 20, 2024 APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit -22% -25% 0% -36% -67% Slide 2 Crimes Against Persons by APD Sector FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 Crimes Against Persons APD Sector FY2023 Q2 FY2024 Q2* Adam Baker Charlie David Edward Frank George Henry Ida Other Total 446 392 494 501 769 641 347 499 376 48 381 312 407 383 630 493 262 462 345 33 4,513 3,708 Percent Change -15% -20% -18% -24% -18% -23% -24% -7% -8% -31% -18% APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit Change from FY2023 to FY2024 (Q2) *Data for FY2024 Q2 only available through March 20, 2024 Slide 3 Crimes Against Persons by City Council District FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 Crimes Against Persons City Council District FY2023 Q2 FY2024 Q2* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Percent Change -20% -20% -10% -16% -27% -22% 4% -30% -28% -14% 454 445 626 625 223 158 356 106 520 168 569 557 696 741 307 202 341 151 721 196 4,481 3,681 -18% APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit Change from FY2023 to FY2024 (Q2) *Data for FY2024 Q2 only available through March 20, 2024 Slide 4 Crimes Against Persons Density (“Hotspots”) FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 Crimes Against Persons FY2023 Q2 …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #4 Biannual Wildfire Readiness - AFD original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

A U STI N FI RE DEP AR TMENT Wildfire Readiness Update Jeffrey Kennedy– Assistant Chief Justice Jones – Wildfire Mitigation Officer BE IT RESOLVED... "Provide a progress report every six months to the Public Safety Commission for the following important components of a comprehensive WUI risk reduction plan." Council Resolution NO. 20160512-016 The information presented in this update are maintained in real-time through dynamic data 1 Wildfire Readiness Update 1. The number of local CWPP’s completed and implemented. 2. The number of local CWPP's started but not completed. 3. The percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is ongoing. 4. The number of public presentations and home assessments provided. 5. The number, size, type and location of fuel mitigation activities conducted. 6. The number of training hours received and conducted. 2 1) The number of local CWPP's completed and implemented is 23. Local level CWPP’s are community led initiatives that AFD facilitates and supports. The Division has hired a new FAC coordinator that is working to engage new communities for FY24. AU STI N CW PP ’s 3 2) The number of local CWPP's started but not completed is 23. Local level CWPP’s are community led initiatives that AFD facilitates and supports. Three of these communities have re-engaged with AFD in the last six months. Acti ve & Eng aged Sentence or subheading goes Here on the page in the header box. 4 3) The percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is still ongoing is 49%. Of the 14% of Austin classified as high risk, 51% is covered by a local level CWPP, 49% are identified as opportunity zones. H igh R is k A reas 5 4) The number of public presentations and home assessments provided in the past 6 months. 8 Presentations and events, including virtual events such as the annual Wildfire Symposium held virtually, and 3 home assessments provided. O utreac h Acti vitie s 6 5) The number, size, type and location of fuel mitigation activities conducted in the past 6 months. 5 Prescribed fires (1,056 ac) completed, by assisting partner agencies. F u e l M i t i g a t i o n 7 6) The number of training hours received and conducted in the past six months. 40 Training hours received and 2,233 training hours conducted …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #6 Recommendation 20240306-004 Collective Sex Crimes Response Model CSCRM - Commission for Women original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

COMMISSION FOR WOMEN RECOMMENDATION Commission for Women Recommendation Number 20240306-004: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Funding for Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) Actions WHEREAS, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and WHEREAS, in September 2019, the City Manager’s Office contracted the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), in conjunction with the Women’s Law Project and the Wellesley Centers for Women, to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the way sexual assaults reported to the Austin Police Department (APD) are investigated and processed; and WHEREAS, sexual assault lawsuits were filed and settlements were approved for Smith et. al. vs City of Austin and Senko et. al. vs City of Austin; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2022, the final PERF report was released, Austin Police Department (APD) Review, Reported Sexual Assault Comprehensive Evaluation, and included comprehensive findings and over one hundred recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Austin Police Department worked with the Austin/Travis County Sexual Assault Response and Resource Team (SARRT) to address the PERF recommendations and take actions, including revisions to APD policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) was established in early 2023 to coordinate the full response to the PERF report, and includes representatives from APD, SARRT, nonprofit and community organizations, survivors and survivor advocates; and WHEREAS, the Commission for Women and Public Safety Commission formed a joint working group in 2023 to support and track the work of the CSCRM and report progress to their respective commissions; and WHEREAS, the work of the CSCRM is significant in scope, spanning multiple working groups, and has identified serious unmet funding requirements and additional needs for fiscal year 2024- 2025; and WHEREAS, funding has been allocated to support APD comprehensive sexual assault/trauma curriculum development and delivery, additional detective hours on misdemeanor and cold cases, the hiring of a CSCRM project manager, the implementation of a survivor survey and a stipend for volunteer project members, among others; and WHEREAS, law enforcement staffing shortages and hiring challenges are impacting support for survivors of sexual assault, and training and increased financial support and innovative approaches are needed to overcome these shortfalls; and WHEREAS, the SAFE Alliance forensic nursing program is …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Combining District & Density Bonus Pre Adoption Draft original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 49 pages

SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM DRAFT – March 27, 2024 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF AUSTIN Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 1 of 49 This page intentionally left blank. Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 2 of 49 Contents BACKGROUND. .............................................................................................................................................. 6 USING THIS DOCUMENT. .............................................................................................................................. 8 Applicability............................................................................................................................................... 8 Organization .............................................................................................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS. ............................................................................................................. 10 1.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Applicability. ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1. Conflicting Provisions. ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3. Application and Review Requirements. ........................................................................................... 11 1.3.1. Development Services Department Director’s Administration. ............................................... 11 1.4. Text, Graphics, and Maps. ................................................................................................................ 11 1.5. Density Bonus Program Evaluation. ................................................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 2: LAND USE STANDARDS. ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Applicability. ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Land Uses. ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1. Permitted (P), Permitted with Conditions (PC), and Conditional Uses (C). .............................. 12 2.3.2. Pedestrian-Oriented Building Frontage Uses. ........................................................................... 16 ARTICLE 3: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. .................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2. South Central Waterfront Overlays. ................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1. Waterfront Overlay (WO) Combining District. ........................................................................... 17 3.2.2. South Shore Subdistrict. ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2.3. Travis Heights Subdistrict. ......................................................................................................... 18 3.2.4. Auditorium Shores Subdistrict. .................................................................................................. 18 3.3. Allowed Density. .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.3.1. Units per Acre. .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.2. Floor-to-Area Ratios by Subdistrict. .......................................................................................... 18 3.3.3. Lot Size. ..................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.4. Impervious Cover and Building Coverage. ................................................................................ 20 3.4. Building Setbacks ............................................................................................................................. 20 3.5. Floor-to-Area Ratio Calculation. ...................................................................................................... 21 Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 3 of 49 3.5.1. Density Distribution Areas. ....................................................................................................... 21 3.5.2. Floor-to-Area Ratio Calculation for Structured Parking. ........................................................... 22 3.5.3. Floor-to-Area Ratio and Dedication of Land. ............................................................................ 22 3.6. Parking. ............................................................................................................................................ 22 3.6.1. Vehicle Parking .......................................................................................................................... 22 3.6.2. Bicycle Parking. ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.7. Required Open Space. ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.8. Compatibility Standards. .................................................................................................................. 24 ARTICLE 4: DESIGN STANDARDS ................................................................................................................. 25 4.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2. Streetscape & Built Environment Requirements. ............................................................................ 25 4.3. Right of Way Standards. ................................................................................................................... 25 4.4. Internal Circulation Routes. ............................................................................................................. 25 4.4.1. Internal Circulation Route Option 1: ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.2. Internal Circulation Route Option 2: ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.3. Internal Circulation Route Option 3: ......................................................................................... 26 4.4.4. Internal Circulation Route Option 4: ......................................................................................... 27 4.5. Supplemental Zones......................................................................................................................... 27 4.5.1. Supplemental Zone Standards. ................................................................................................. 27 ARTICLE 5: DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................. 29 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM .................................................................... 30 1. Intent. .................................................................................................................................................. 30 2. Applicability. ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3. Program Overview. ............................................................................................................................. 30 4. South Central Waterfront Subdistricts …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Highlights of South Central Waterfront Change Log original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Key Adjustments to the South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program March 27, 2024 The South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus program underwent a one-month public input process. As a result, feedback was provided by community members, Boards and Commissions, staff, and other stakeholders. Staff consolidated and assessed the feedback to determine recommended adjustments to the draft code for the South Central Waterfront. The following is a list of the key changes made in the draft code as a result of the discussion, using the following key as the source of the adjustment: Boards and Commissions, Public Input, and/or Staff. Key: Source of Input Boards and Commissions Public Staff District Boundary and Subdistricts Source Adjustment Section 1.2 Section 3.3.2 District boundaries were further expanded to include three properties on the western side of the South Central Waterfront. See the updated map for detail. To underscore the commitment to transit-oriented development in the area, the FAR was adjusted to properties near to the proposed Project Connect station on the north side of East Riverside Drive. See the updated map for detail. Height limits have been added to Subdistricts 1 through 4. They are: 1 - 120', 2 - 240', 3 - 300', 4 - 600'. Subdistrict 5 remains with unlimited height. This adjustment reinforces and improves the density gradient from the closest areas to downtown being the most dense, and for the density to transition down as one moves further away from downtown. Section 3.3.2 - 1 - Land Use Source Adjustment Cocktail Lounges above 3,500sf in size will trigger the need for a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit process will better assist in the review and regulation of entertainment / nightlife noise disturbances. The Custom Manufacturing land use has been limited to 2,500sf. The limitation will deter larger single-purpose land uses and encourage more flexible development that supports smaller creative businesses. Section 2.3.1(C)(4) Section 2.3.1(D)(1) Adjustment Section 2.7(C) Section 4.4.3 Shade provisions increased for cantilevered, affixed, and freestanding options. Trees will still be the dominant shade mechanism, but this change allows for strong urban design and diversity in design of the urban space. This is also consistent with activities in other urban areas in the city. An additional internal circulation route type with a bicycle lane was added. This addition increases bicycle connectivity within the South Central Waterfront area and facilitates safe separation of …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Item 3 Draft Recommendation for the financial value of community benefits to meet bonus requirements original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

[BOARD/COMMISSION NAME] RECOMMENDATION 20240501-XXX [XXX is the agenda item number] Isaac Cohen SCW Combining district Date: Mar 26, 2023 Subject: Motioned By: Recommendation Regarding the financial value of community benefits to meet bonus requirements, benefits that meet certain criteria should carry stackable bonuses or value multipliers that provide developers with an outsized financial incentive to provide them. Criteria for bonus multipliers are listed below:  Permanent benefits with appropriate long-term/permanent easements  Publicly accessible space that does not serve as access to retail storefronts where any of the following Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell apply (may require coordination across multiple lots to be met).  It is adjacent to the lakefront trail, transit stations, or Bouldin Creek.  It is a contiguous green space with a trail providing a shorter path from endpoint to endpoint than streets (including inter-DDA). or a transit station (bus or rail). (Sq Ft number TBD)  Connects from a pedestrian accessible street to the Town Lake Waterfront, West Bouldin Creek,  Publicly accessible green space that meets a square footage minimum to represent a high-value park  Specific kinds of transit-supportive infrastructure that uniquely enables transit use, such as the examples below.  Larger than typical publicly accessible shelters  Publicly accessible restrooms  Transit interconnection hubs for ride-share or private bus lines to be able to drop off and pick up.  Infrastructure that uniquely enables multi-modal and accessible transport from the new rail station to destinations west of the station along Riverside and Barton Springs Road, namely  Palmer Events center  Long Center  Auditorium shores  Zilker Park/Barton Springs. Description of Recommendation to Council Value multipliers for certain benefits will incentivize either uniquely large, uniquely useful, or uniquely desirable permanent community benefits as opposed to smaller, disjointed, lower-value benefits. Rationale: The current staff recommendation does not articulate the valuation process for community benefits. It appears unopinionated as to how the requirement is met if the numerical monetary requirement is achieved. The current approach allows a developer to decide which benefits to provide without appropriate incentives for benefits that may require more work, permanent easements, or cooperation and planning across multiple lots. By delivering higher value via multipliers to permanent benefits that are 1 of 2 uniquely beneficial and possible in certain areas and combining these multipliers with the ability to do transferrable development rights, we can create the appropriate economic benefits to …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Item 3 Draft Recommendation to Amend the Boundaries of the Housing Fee Spending Area original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to amend the boundaries of the Housing Fee Spending Area within SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM Ryan Puzycki Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell Motioned By: Description of Recommendation to Council Redefine the South Central Waterfront Housing Fee Spending Area to be within the walkshed of the district and current or planned transit lines transecting or terminating in the district, bound by the borders defined in Section 6.4.E.1.b. Rationale: Housing Trust funds used toward creating affordable housing units for the South Central Waterfront District must be used within the district or within walking distance of the district and nearby transit. Vote For: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: [Staff or board member can sign] 1 of 1

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.