808'-0" 809'-0" 810'-0" 811'-0" 812'-0" 813'-0" 814'-0" 815'-0" 816'-0" 817'-0" 818'-0" 819'-0" 820'-0" 821'-0" 822'-0" 823'-0" 824'-0" 825'-0" 826'-0" 827'-0" 828'-0" 829'-0" 830'-0" 831'-0" 832'-0" 833'-0" 803'-0" 804'-0" 805'-0" 806'-0" 807'-0" 808'-0" 809'-0" 810'-0" 811'-0" 812'-0" 813'-0" 814'-0" 815'-0" 816'-0" 817'-0" 818'-0" 819'-0" 820'-0" 821'-0" 822'-0" 823'-0" 824'-0" 825'-0" 826'-0" 827'-0" 828'-0" 829'-0" 830'-0" 831'-0" 832'-0" 833'-0" 834'-0" 835'-0" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE5 BED/4.5 BATH4,149 SFEXISTING SINGLE STORY WOOD STRUCTURERE: LANDSCAPE FOR SITE DESIGNEXISTING DRIVEWAY TO REMAINRE: LANDSCAPE FOR SITE DESIGNN60°59'00"W 101.65'N28°56'00"E 193.59'N71°40'00"E 28.96'R=96.64'L=104.79'▲=62°07'39"CB=S27°43'10"ECD=99.73'S58°47'00"E 60.87'S24°38'00"E 158.33'LOT 2LOT 3WESTERN HILLS DRIVE(50' ROW)N61°00'00"W 74.04'5'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT5'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT5'-0" UTILITY EASEMENT25'-0" BUILDING SETBACKEDGE OF ROOF ABOVEOUTDOOR SHOWER829' - 3 1/4"832' - 11 5/8"824' - 4 7/8"829' - 5 5/8"827' - 4 7/8"829' - 5 5/8"833' - 0 1/4"827' - 0"POOL1-STORY WOODSTRUCTURE10' CoA REAR SETBACKEDGE OF ROOF ABOVEUTILITY POLEUTILITY POLE827' - 4 3/8"824' - 0"822' - 5 7/8"820' - 6"817' - 6"826' - 6"2430243124362445OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOELAWN, RE: LANDSCAPE824' - 0"UP822' - 5 7/8"3'-1 1/4"EXISTING CARPORT TO REMAINNEW CANTILEVERED BAY WINDOWEXISTING RETAINING WALLS TO REMAINWOOD FENCE AND GATE, RE: LANDSCAPESTEEL PLANTER5'-0"5'-0"816' - 9 3/4"WWGE832' - 11"829' - 4 7/8"EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAINNEW WOOD FENCENEW WOOD FENCE AND GATE, RE: LANDSCAPE813' - 10 1/2"ADJACENT GRADE816' - 8"ADJACENT GRADEADJACENT GRADENEW STAIR AT EXISTING LOCATION, RE: LANDSCAPENEW SIDEWALK, RE: LANDSCAPEEXISTING CONCRETE PORCH TO REMAINOUTDOOR KITCHENBENCH, RE: LANDSCAPENEW POOL DECKEXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAINNEW GATE, RE: LANDSCAPEPRIVACY FENCE, RE: LANDSCAPEGENERAL NOTES:1.NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY TRENCHESPERMITTED IN THE 1/2 CRITICAL ROOTZONE.2.NO ACCESS, PARKING OR MATERIALSTORAGE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THETREE PROTECTION FENCE.3.ALL ROOT CUTS TO BE CLEAN (NOFRAYED EDGES)4.FERTILIZE TREE ROOTS AND PROVIDEIRRIGATION DURING CONSTRUCTION.5.NO UNDERGROUND UTILITYTRENCHING WITHIN 12' OF TREETRUNKS.6.PROVIDE 5' TALL CHAIN LINK MESHTREE PROTECTION FENCING PER CITYOF AUSTIN REQUIREMENTS AND 8"MULCH GROUND COVER DURING CONSTRUCTION AROUND ALL TREESIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA.7.PROVIDE BREATHABLE RUBBER MATOVER 8" MULCH AT LOCATIONSWHERE TREE PROTECTION FENCING ISNOT POSSIBLE.8.WRAP 2X4 BOARDS AROUND ALL TREETRUNKS ON SITE OR IN ADJACENTRIGHT OF WAY DURINGCONSTRUCTION.9.ALL LIMBS AND TREE TRIMMING TO BEPERFORMED BY OWNER PROVIDEDARBORIST.10.GC TO ENSURE THAT ANY CONCRETEWASHOUT DOES NOT OCCUR WITHINTHE CRZ OF ANY TREES.11.GC TO AVOID TRENCHING WITHIN1/2 CRZ OF ANY TREES.12.IN AREAS WHERE SILT FENCE ISLOCATED WITHIN THE 1/2 CRZ OF ANYPROTECTED TREE, A MULCH SOCK ISTO BE USED IN-PLACE OF SILT FENCE.13.TREE PROTECTION FENCING MUST BEON GRADE (FLAT POST BASESWEIGHTED DOWN WITH SAND BAGS) AND MUST ENCOMPASS THE ¼ CRZ ATMINIMUM.14.MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF EXISTINGGRADE AND LANDSCAPE WHEREVERPOSSIBLE, WHILE PROVIDING POSITIVEDRAINAGE AWAY FROM HOUSE.15.AFTER CONSTRUCTION, …
23 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS APRIL 3, 2024 PR-2024-021401; GF-2024-030551 3405 WILLOW SPRINGS ROAD Relocate a ca. 1941 house outside the city limits. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Two-story house with Tudor Revival and Minimal Traditional stylistic influences. It is clad in horizontal siding and capped with a gently sloped catslide roof, beneath which exposed rafter tails are visible. Screened 6:6 windows are shaded by wooden picket awnings. The house at 3405 Willow Springs Road, originally addressed as 3405 or 3401 Post Road, was built around 1941. Robert A. and Birdie Holt were its first occupants, and they later built a secondary dwelling on the lot to host renters. Robert Holt worked as a cabinetmaker and foreman for the Woodward Manufacturing Company, located nearby at the old Penn Field site. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is constructed with Tudor Revival and Minimal Traditional stylistic influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear] to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the relocation permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 23 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 23 – 3 23 – 4 23 – 5 Occupancy History City Directory Research, March 2024 Robert A. and Birdie Holt, owners 3405 ½: Pete L. Pesoli, renter Ruth Smith, renter – teacher 1959 1955 1952 1949 1942 1941 Robert A. and Birdie Holt, owners – foreman, Woodward Manufacturing Mrs. Nina C. Pearson, renter – stenographer, W. H. Richardson Co. Mrs. Darlyne J. Mauldin, renter – bookkeeper Mrs. Betty Pfiester, renter – clerk, State Highway Department Robert A. and Birdie Holt, owners – foreman, …
City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission DRAFT Seconded By: Witt Featherston Subject: Recommendations on Environmental Sustainability, Council Resolution Date: April 3, 2024 Motioned By: JuanRaymon Rubio Dear Joint Sustainability Committee, Mayor, and Council Members, In response to Councilmember Ryan Alter’s resolution on an Environmental Investment Plan, the Historic Landmark Commission recommends the City Manager consider the role of historic preservation in helping the City reach its climate goals. The current draft of the new Equity-Based includes the following recommendations that support environmental Preservation Plan sustainability: • Recognize the significant external costs associated with demolition by adopting policies and practices that incentivize alternatives: Increase review fees to offset reduced or eliminated fees for historic preservation efforts. • Make it easier to relocate buildings within Austin: Following a Council resolution in fall 2023, work with other City departments and stakeholders to explore how to facilitate local relocation when preserving a building in place is not feasible. • Encourage property owners to retain older buildings by allowing approved demolition permits to be converted to relocation permits: Support retention of older buildings and encourage sustainability by streamlining the process to change approved demolition permits to relocation permits. Allow previously paid demolition permit application fees and approved processes to be applied to remodel or relocation permit applications for owners who decide to retain an older building. • Encourage deconstruction and materials salvage when preservation in place and relocation are not feasible: In line with Austin’s goal of zero waste by 2040, explore and adopt policies, programs, and incentives that incentivize or require deconstruction and materials salvage in light of environmental and health impacts, the loss of cultural heritage, and increased landfill waste. Create a supply of historic-age quality building materials. We recommend city staff be directed to identify the impact of these recommendations, consider their inclusion in a future Environmental Investment Plan, and work with city departments to develop proposed ordinances and code changes. Thank you, Historic Landmark Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 20240215-025 WHEREAS, climate change represents an existential threat to the City of Austin, the nation, and the planet; and WHEREAS, to meet the threat level of the climate emergency and its effects on the community, the City must act urgently and expediently; and WHEREAS. in recent years, Austin has experienced an increasing number of shocks in the form of natural- and human-driven disasters, as well as stresses that affect everyday vulnerabilities in the local community; and WHEREAS, on August 8,2019, the Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 20190808-078 declaring a climate emergency in the City and calling to accelerate the timeline for achieving the City's climate goals; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 20190808-078 directed the City Manager to promote interdepartmental coordination to ensure that existing emergency management plans offer an aligned approach to the threats of the climate crisis and natural hazards, including wildfire and flooding, and to identify where planning gaps may exist; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Council approved the Austin Climate Equity Plan that provided 74 strategies to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040; and WHEREAS, the Austin Climate Equity Plan also established environmental justice goals to prioritize low-income communities and communities of color to remedy disproportionate harm; and Page 1 of 7 WHEREAS, concurrent with the Austin Climate Equity Plan, Council passed Resolution No. 20210930-110 prioritizing its implementation, requesting Code amendments and budget recommendations, and establishing a public dashboard and quarterly progress updates; and WHEREAS, according to the last quarterly update in August 2022, three of 74 strategies are complete, 41 are underway, and many strategies require substantial investment to achieve; and WHEREAS, by resolution, directed analysis or approved plans, the Council has previously directed the City Manager to take specific steps to advance Austin's climate change, sustainability, and resilience goals, including Water Forward, the Austin Strategic Mobility Plan, the Watershed Protection Strategic Plan, the Green Infrastructure Strengths and Gaps Assessment, Austin's Urban Forest Plan, the Austin Resource Recovery Comprehensive Plan, One Austin: Resilience Framework for Action, Protection Plan, the Parks and Recreation Department (PARD) Long Range Plan and Land Management Plan, Central Texas Regional Air Quality Plan, the Austin/Travis County Community Wildfire Preparedness Plan, and the Austin/Travis County Food Plan; and the Austin Energy Resource, Generation, and Climate WHEREAS, the programs and goals set forth in the City's plans would collectively make Austin more environmentally sustainable and develop the community resilience to adapt …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2024-0011 HLC DATE: March 6, 2024; April 3, 2024 PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Belinda and Samuel Davis (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Fashionette Beauty Shop/Elmer and Ethel McDonald Jackson Home WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1206 East 13th Street/1209 Bob Harrison Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP (Central East Austin NP) COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-NP). QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Historical associations, community value HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: March 6, 2024- Postpone the public hearing to April 4, 2024. (10-0) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods, Preservation Austin, Residents of E 12th St, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Swede Hill Neighborhood Association DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(ii) Historical Associations. The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, institutions, businesses, or events of historic importance that contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represent a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. The buildings at 1206 East 13th Street and 1209 Bob Harrison Street are associated with African American businesswoman and cosmetologist Ethel McDonald Jackson, who ran a successful home-based business from 1944 to 1974 and whose family served their community as civic leaders throughout the twentieth century. According to Ms. Belinda Davis, daughter of Elmer and Ethel McDonald Jackson, her mother’s ambitious spirit was sparked as soon as she finished high school in Bastrop, Texas. “My Mama often spoke of why she did not attend a four-year college after high school,” writes Davis. “As a child of The Great Depression, she wanted to enter the workforce as soon as possible to assist her family.” Ethel McDonald finished beauty college and immediately became both an instructor at the school and a working hairdresser at the Triple Mirror Beauty Shop at 605 San Jacinto. Davis describes …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2024-0016 HLC DATE: April 3, 2024 PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Robin Abrams (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Russell and Jean Lee House WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-CO-NP to SF-3-H-CO-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-conditional overlay-neighborhood plan (SF-3-CO-NP) to family residence-historic landmark-conditional overlay-neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-CO-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee), Central Austin Community Development Corporation, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Friends of Heritage, Heritage Neighborhood Association, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2020 North Central Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends 3110 West Avenue as eligible for individual landmark designation, eligible for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The house at 3110 West Avenue is described in the West Campus, North University, Heritage, Bryker Woods, and North Hyde Park Historic Resource Survey, concluded in 2020 by H-H-M, Inc., as architecturally significant for its design by developer Ada Penn.1 It is characteristic of Penn’s designs, which often incorporated elements from the Craftsman and Prairie styles. Its ribbon windows and rustic stone porch piers are indicative of Penn’s stylistic tendencies. § 25-2-352(3)(c)(ii) Historical Associations. The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, 1 Historic Building Survey Report for North Central Austin: West Campus, North University, Heritage, Bryker Woods, and North Hyde Park. H-H-M, Inc. Appendix D, p. …
City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet A. APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC ZONING PROJECT INFORMATION: DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY APPLICATION DATE:__________________ FILE NUMBER(S) _____________________________________________ TENTATIVE HLC DATE: TENTATIVE PC or ZAP DATE:_________________ TENTATIVE CC DATE:_________________ CASE MANAGER _______________________________ APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:________________________________________ CITY INITIATED: YES / NO ROLLBACK: YES/NO BASIC PROJECT DATA: 1. OWNER’S NAME:________________________________________________________________________________ 2. PROJECT NAME:________________________________________________________________________________ 3. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (or Range): __________________________________________________________ Robin Abrams Russell and Jean Lee House 3110 West Avenue Travis 78705 ZIP__________________________ COUNTY:______________________________________ IF PROJECT ADDRESS CANNOT BE DEFINED ABOVE: LOCATED ____________ FRONTAGE FEET ALONG THE N. S. E. W. (CIRCLE ONE) SIDE OF ______________________________________ (ROAD NAME PROPERTY FRONTS ONTO), WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY _______________________________________ DISTANCE FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH _________________________________________ CROSS STREET. AREA TO BE REZONED: 4. ACRES _________________ 0.2377 (OR) SQ.FT._______________ 5. ZONING AND LAND USE INFORMATION: EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE SF-3-CO-NP __________ __________ __________ Residence __________ __________ __________ TRACT# (IF MORE THAN 1) ________ ________ ________ ACRES / SQ. FT. PROPOSED USE PROPOSED ZONING 0.2377 _______________ _______________ _______________ Residence _____________ _____________ _____________ SF-3-H-CO-NP ____________ ____________ ____________ RELATED CURRENT CASES: 6. ACTIVE ZONING CASE? 7. RESTRICTIVE COVENANT? (YES / NO) 8. SUBDIVISION? 9. SITE PLAN? (YES / NO) (YES / NO) (YES / NO) NO NO NO NO FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ Adopted December 2012 6 City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (SUBDIVISION REFERENCE OR METES AND BOUNDS): 10a. SUBDIVISION REFERENCE: Name: _____________________________________________________________ Div D Oakwood Block(s) ______________________ Lot(s )___________________ Outlot(s) _____________________ Lot 55 & Lot 56 Plat Book: _________________________________Page Number:_________________________________ OLT 72 & 75 10b. METES AND BOUNDS (Attach two copies of certified field notes if subdivision reference is not available or zoning includes partial lots) DEED REFERENCE CONVEYING PROPERTY TO PRESENT OWNER AND TAX PARCEL I.D.: 11. VOLUME:_______________PAGE:______________ TAX PARCEL I.D. NO. _____________________________ 211128 12170 1592 OTHER PROVISIONS: 12. IS PROPERTY IN A ZONING COMBINING DISTRICT / OVERLAY ZONE? YES / NO YES TYPE OF COMBINING DIST/OVERLAY ZONE (NCCD,NP, etc)____________________________________ NP 13. LOCATED IN A LOCAL OR NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT? YES / NO NO 14. IS A TIA REQUIRED? YES / NO (NOT REQUIRED IF BASE ZONING IS NOT CHANGING) NO TRIPS PER DAY:_____________________________ TRAFFIC SERIAL ZONE(S):_________________ ________________ _________________ ________________ OWNERSHIP TYPE: 15. ___SOLE ___COMMUNITY PROPERTY ___PARTNERSHIP ___CORPORATION ____TRUST X If ownership is other than sole or community property, list individuals/partners/principals below or attach …
Russell and Jean Lee House 3110 West Avenue 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Adrian.Moreno2@austintexas.gov March 5, 2024 To: Adrian Moreno Customer Service Rep Sr, Customer Experience Unit City of Austin Development Services Department From: Jolene Kiolbassa, President Heritage Neighborhood Association Re: Zoning Case C14H-2024-0016 Dear Mr. Moreno: At a meeting on Monday, March 4 2024, the Heritage Neighborhood Association voted unanimously to support historic landmark status for the Russell and Jean Lee House, 3110 West Avenue. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, Jolene Kiolbassa, President Heritage Neighborhood Association
6 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 6, 2024 HR-2024-007660 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4204 AVENUE H PROPOSAL Construct a second-floor addition. Replace the foundation and roof. Restore front windows. Construct a new garage. Construct a pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a second-floor addition, clad in reused teardrop siding and new matching siding. 2) Replace the foundation with concrete footers. 3) Restore the front windows, replacing deteriorated wood elements in-kind. 4) Replace the metal roof with a new metal roof. 5) Construct a new rear garage. 6) Construct a new pool. 7) Add a screened patio to the rear and a covered porch to the front-side of the building. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS One-story Craftsman bungalow with covered entry, horizontal wood siding, 1:1 wood windows, and traditional Craftsman detailing. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. General Standards 1.1: Prevention of Demolition Demolition of any contributing structure is strongly discouraged under all circumstances. The proposed project demolishes the rear of the building to construct a new addition. 1.2: Retention of Historic Style Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project retains some historic features at the front of the building but changes its scale. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. The proposed addition and garage include details that make differentiation of new from historic materials challenging, such as exposed rafter tails and triangular eave brackets. It extends the roofline and chimney and replaces the existing bracket in the new location. 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing or Potentially Contributing Structures 1. Preserve the historic fabric: Repair deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. 2. Reconstruct missing or un-repairable architectural features with the following: a) Recycled historic materials that approximate the size and match the scale, profile, and appearance of the deteriorated or missing feature, if available. b) New material that approximates the size and matches the scale, profile, and appearance of the historic material. Reconstruct or rebuild missing architectural features using photographic …
7 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APRIL 3, 2024 HR-2024-020047 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4004 AVENUE H PROPOSAL Add a screened porch. Construct a two-story accessory building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Add a screened porch to the north side of the house. The proposed porch is one-story and capped with a shingled, side- gabled roof to match the existing roof. 2) Construct a new two-story studio in the backyard. The proposed accessory building is located at the rear side of the house, behind the driveway. It is clad in fiber cement horizontal siding and features a hipped roof and fixed undivided windows. ARCHITECTURE One-story Craftsman bungalow. DESIGN STANDARDS The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. General Standards 1.2: Retention of Historic Style Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project retains the historic style of the contributing building. 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism The proposed project mostly avoids false historicism through the placement of the porch, though excluding exposed rafter tails would increase the differentiation between new and old materials. 4. Residential Standards: Additions to Contributing Single Family and Multi-Family Structures 4.1: Preservation of Historic Character Construct additions so as to require the removal or modification of a minimum of historic fabric. Do not construct additions which will require the removal of any portion of the front façade. Design additions to existing residential buildings to reflect the form and style of the existing house. The proposed addition removes minimal historic fabric and reflects the form and style of the existing house. 4.2: Location Locate new additions and alterations to the rear or rear side of the building so that they will be less visible from the street. The proposed porch is located at the side of the house. 4.3: Roof, Fenestration, and Siding 1. Make the pitch and height of the roof of the addition compatible to that of the existing house. 2. Make windows visible from the street on any addition compatible with those on the existing house in terms of sash configuration, proportion, spacing and placement. 3. Use exterior siding materials on the addition which match or are compatible with that of the existing house. The proposed project’s roof, fenestration, and materials are compatible. …
1'-43 4" O.H. 23 4" ℄ ℄ 3'-81 2" ℄ 3'-81 2" ℄ 23 4" 14'-111 4" 7'-03 4" 1'-43 4" O.H. " 9 - ' 1 . . H O ℄ " 4 3 2 " 2 1 3 - ' 5 1 " 2 1 8 - ' 3 ℄ " 2 1 8 - ' 3 ℄ " 2 1 8 - ' 3 ℄ " 2 1 8 - ' 3 " 4 3 2 ℄ SCREEN PORCH 001 7'-51 2" ℄ 1 SCREEN PORCH FLOOR PLAN 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " RADERE H IEM C C. S L C H I T , J R . E C T T SIG E R . J S T A T E 20007 F T O E S AX 2/13/2024 FOR PERMIT BEAMAN RESIDENCE LISA + JOE BEAMAN 4004 AVENUE H AUSTIN, TX 78751 ISSUE DATE: 2.13.24 SCREEN PORCH FLOOR PLAN M E R Z B A U DESIGN COLLECTIVE 4009 Banister Ln. 250, Austin TX 78704 T | 512 636 5900 E | jcschmeil@merzbau.com J.C. SCHMEIL, ARCHITECT AIA | TEXAS LICENSE NO. 20007 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 4" = 1'-0" A2.3
2 3 ' - 6 " C R Z 11'-9" 1 2 CRZ ' . 0 0 5 7 E " 7 1 0 1 ° 0 3 N ' OVERHEAD POWER LINES (E) UTILITY POLE 9'-91 4" " 6 - ' 6 (E) WOOD FENCE 23.5" PECAN 5'-101 2" 1 4 CRZ (N) 2 STORY STUDIO (E) WOOD FENCE (N) PATIO Q B B S 59°45'02" E 125.16' (N) WOOD FENCE 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK (N) SCREENED PORCH (N) CONC. DRIVEWAY K C A B T E S D R A Y T N O R F ' 5 2 25'-0" CRZ 25" POSTOAK Z R C 14 " 3 - ' 6 Z R C 1 2 2'-6" 1 " 4 3 9 - ' 1 1 ' . 0 0 5 7 W ' " 0 0 8 0 ° 0 3 S LOT 22-24 BLK 30 HYDE PARK ADDN (E) CONC. WALKWAY H E U N E V A ) . . W O R . ' 0 6 ( OVEN STACK REF FRZ BEV. WINE K C A B T E S D R A Y R A E R ' 0 1 OVERHEAD POWER FEEDER LINE 3 1'- 0 " C R Z D W (E) 1 STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 33'-5" 1 SITE PLAN 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " N RADERE H IEM C C. S L C H I T , J R . E C T T SIG E R . J S T A T E 20007 F T O E S AX 2/13/2024 FOR PERMIT 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK (E) WOOD FENCE 15'-6" 1 2 CRZ 31" PECAN 7'-9" 1 4 CRZ Z R C 1 4 " 3 5'- 21" PALM (E) WOOD FENCE Z C R 1 " 2 6 0 ' - 1 21'-0" CRZ N 59°45'02" W 125.21' " 0 1 - ' 4 1 3 2 ' - 0 " C R Z 1 6 '- 0 " 1 2 C R Z 32" PECAN BEAMAN RESIDENCE LISA + JOE BEAMAN 4004 AVENUE H AUSTIN, TX 78751 ISSUE DATE: 2.13.24 M E R Z B A U DESIGN COLLECTIVE 4009 Banister Ln. #250, Austin TX 78704 T | 512 636 5900 E | jcschmeil@merzbau.com J.C. SCHMEIL, ARCHITECT AIA | TEXAS LICENSE NO. 20007 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ROOF PLAN 1" = 10'-0" …
