HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JANUARY 24, 2022 C14H-1986-0008; HR-2021-200636 CONGRESS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT 522 CONGRESS AVENUE C.7 – 1 Install a sculpture at the southwest corner of 6th St. and Congress Ave. in an existing street patio within the right-of-way. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed sculpture will be located within an existing street patio along Congress Ave. adjacent to the Scarbrough Building, a historic landmark. The sculpture is approximately 12’ tall and reads “Keep Austin Weird” depending on the angle of view. The sculpture will be located in the right-of-way for Congress Ave. The map in the historic zoning file for the Scarbrough Building indicates that only the building footprint is designated; the designation does not extend into the right-of-way. See the map on page 3 below. As such, this review does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness, and the Commission’s comments are advisory. Installation of the sculpture requires a license agreement with the City of Austin. A license agreement is for a temporary encroachment on the right-of-way, requires annual renewal, and can be revoked by the City with notice. The sculpture will be securely installed, though it is in three pieces and is ultimately moveable. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects within National Register districts. However, provisions for review of public art are not included in the Historic Design Standards. Standards for new streetscape elements reference compatibility of style, design, and materials with the surrounding historic district. These factors may not apply in evaluating artistic expression; sculptures may be site-specific and designed to respond to their environment or may be purposefully distinct. The Commission should focus solely on impacts to the setting of the Congress Avenue Historic District and not comment on the artistic merit of the proposed art piece. While there is not a historic precedent for public art within the Congress Avenue Historic District, multiple sculptures currently are installed within the district, and the impact of this additional piece will be minimal on the overall character of the district. Within the streetscape, the 12’ sculpture is not of a scale that competes with the substantial height of the 8-story Scarbrough tower. At the pedestrian level, while larger than human scale, the sculpture will be aligned with the street trees and …
SCARBROUGH BUILDING KEEP AUSTIN WEIRD SCULPTURE Colina West Real Estate Historical Landmark Commission Application Supporting Documents S C A R B R O U G H - P O C K E T PA R K S Before After S C A R B R O U G H - P O C K E T PA R K S Before After P O C K E T PA R K S D E S I G N P R O C E S S C O M P L E T E D P O C K E T PA R K S S C U L P T U R E L O C AT I O N 6 t h S t r e e t Congress Ave S C U L P T U R E I N S P I R AT I O N S C U L P T U R E D E S I G N P R O C E S S S C U L P T U R E D E S I G N P R O C E S S C O M P L E T E D S C U L P T U R E 8 T H & C O L O R A D O – N E O N H O R S E 8 1 6 C O N G R E S S – S T R U C T U R E 8 2 3 C O N G R E S S – T R E E G A R D E N C E S A R C H AV E Z A N D C O N G R E S S - V E R A C R U Z A L L N AT U R A L M U R A L 3 0 1 C O N G R E S S ( TA C O D E L I ) - E G Y P T L O O K I N G S C U L P T U R E S 6 T H A N D C O L O R A D O – S C U L P T U R E I N S I D E C O U RT YA R …
January 19, 2022 City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission 301 West Second Street Austin, TX 78701 Re: Support for January 24, 2022, Meeting Agenda Item B.2. 522 Congress Avenue – Scarbrough Building – Sculpture installation Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, The Downtown Austin Alliance would like to express strong support for Colina West’s request for a temporary permit for the installation of a new sculpture, titled Keep Austin Weird, at the Scarbrough Building pocket patio on the southwest corner of 6th and Congress in downtown Austin. Two of the priorities of our Roadmap to Recovery and Resilience for downtown Austin are to support the preservation and recovery of downtown’s small, locally-owned businesses and live music scene and to elevate inclusive and engaging experiences in downtown’s public spaces and activate them with art, cultural and music. We support the installation of the Keep Austin Weird sculpture as a tactical strategy that will help achieve these goals. The sculpture will provide a new, engaging, social media posting experience at 6th and Congress that will draw people to shop at the nearby retail businesses and to explore the rich culture and history of the Congress Avenue National Historic District. It will enhance and complement the design of the Scarbrough Building’s pocket patio as well as the series of pocket patios, public art installations and murals already on the Avenue. We support Colina West’s request for the temporary permit and look forward to seeing visitors and locals enjoy the sculpture once it is installed. Thank you. Sincerely, Dewitt Peart President and CEO Cc: Amber Allen, City of Austin Historic Preservation Office The Downtown Austin Alliance mission: To create, preserve and enhance the value and vitality of downtown Austin.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MONDAY, January 24, 2022– 6:00 PM MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AT CITY HALL Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Anissa Castillo Witt Featherston Kevin Koch Carl Larosche Kelly Little Trey McWhorter Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright AGENDA CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak prior to the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. December 17, 2021 – Offered for consent approval 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Consider nomination of Bradford Patterson for a three-year term on the Austin Economic Development Corporation (AEDC) board 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases 1 A.1. PR-2021-137925 – 1505 Forest Trl. – Discussion Council District 10 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Owner’s Representative: Carolina Escamilla City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Staff Recommendation: The house meets the criteria for landmark designation for its unique architecture, landscape features, and historical association with Charles E. Green, editor of the Austin American-Statesman for over 30 years; the commission may want to consider the character of Green’s writings in determining whether to recommend historic zoning. B. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness B.1. HR-2021-202819 – 2402 San Gabriel St. – Consent postponement to February 28, 2022 Rev. Jacob Fontaine Gold Dollar Building Council District 9 Proposal: Remove second-story balcony enclosure and roof. Applicant: Natalia Lopez City Staff: Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1264 Staff Recommendation: Postpone the case to February 28, 2022. B.2. Not used. C. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Permits within National Register Districts C.1. HR-2021-180207 – 906 E. 14th St. – Consent (postponed December 17, 2021) Swedish Hill National Register District Council District 1 Proposal: Addition/remodel. Applicant: Oliver Shuttlesworth City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Committee Feedback: Reduce plate height, consider rotating addition, reconsider cladding material, reconsider window configuration. Staff Recommendation: Comment on and release the plans. C.2. HR-2021-193614 – 1808 W. 6th St. – Consent (postponed December 17, 2021) …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Friday, January 21, 2022 11:10 AM PAZ Preservation Permit application # HR22-001198 This message is from Catherine Sims. I live at 803 Avondale Road, Austin, TX 78704. I recently received a notice of public hearing for case # HR 22‐001198, Ryan Rodenberg, 804 Rutherford Place. The permit requested is for a demolition permit for the property. I support this permit being approved. I am in favor of Mr. Rodenberg's petition. I do not want to attend a public hearing because I am over 70 years old. Doing so is not advisable for my age group, or health status, due to Covid protocols. I do want to register my support, however. Thank you, Catherine Sims 803 Avondale Road Austin, TX 78704 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Thomas Blank Friday, January 21, 2022 7:23 AM PAZ Preservation Case GF 22-001167 - 512 E Monroe St *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I am in favor of approving Ms. Allen’s demolition permit application at 512 E Monroe. This property belongs to her and she should be able to do with it as she pleases. Thank you, Tom Blank 1205 Bickler Rd, Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
1700 Lavaca Item D.13 Historic Landmark Commission January 24, 2022 1700 Overview • Collectively 0.0317 acres, or approximately 1,380 SF • DMU (Downtown Mixed Use) Lot Size: Building Size: • Approx. 1,126 SF Zoning: Built: • Circa 1883 Current Use: • Restaurant Historic Use: • Grocery, Cleaners Photo Landmark Designation Criteria A property must meet at least two of the below criteria: i. Architecture ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature i. Architecture × Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; × Exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; × Represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; × Serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; × Possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or × Represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. i. Architecture Missing original features: • Original porch with overhead metal awning • Metal cornices • Cobbler structure • 1900-1910 additions to grocer and cleaner’s structures • Associated frame residential dwelling • Doors and windows on back of structure may have been modified/reconstructed 1894 Sanborn ii. Historical Associations groups, institutions, The property has long-standing significant associations with events persons, of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. businesses, or ii. Historical Associations Long standing historic association: - Avid bowler - Active PTA and Capital Study Guild - Member of St. Martin Lutheran Church - One of several Cash Stores in Austin during the time Landmark Designation Criteria iii. Archeology iv. Community Value v. Landscape Feature The property has, or is expected to yield, significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region; The property has a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, a neighborhood, or a particular group. The property is a significant natural or designed landscape or landscape feature with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Request request the …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Molly White Friday, January 21, 2022 11:25 AM PAZ Preservation 1208 S 5 ST *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Amber Allen, I own 1206 S. 5th and received the Demolition application for PR‐2021‐193617 GF 21‐205522. The previous owner, Harriet Venable had lived in the house her entire life and inherited it from her parents when they died. Harriet was disabled, and I see on TCAD that she had a DP Disability exemption as well as a Homestead exemption. Both were correct. Harriet sold and moved in October 2021. TCAD shows the new owner as Joe L Velasco with a California address. TCAD's 2022 record for the property also shows the homestead and disability exemptions continuing to apply. It does not seem appropriate for Harriet Venable's disability exemption to carry over to a new owner. Please investigate the situation. Also, much as I dislike housing to be destroyed, I do not have any evidence of historic significance to 1208 S. 5th. I appreciate your attention to my question. Molly White CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Tony Beckwith Friday, January 21, 2022 11:32 AM PAZ Preservation Case Number: GF 22-001028 - 607 E 38th St *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I object to the demolition of the above listed property. The plan is to replace it with a 4000 sq ft duplex and detached garage. This structure is too large for the lot and does not maintain the neighborhood integrity. Thank you, Lillian Beckwith 602 Carolyn Ave. 78705 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: David Guarino Friday, January 21, 2022 12:52 PM PAZ Preservation nancy lynch 2021 202292 PR *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attention Amber Allen: I am the property owner at 605 East 38th Street, where I have resided with my wife, Nancy A. Lynch, for the past 36 years. I would like to offer comments concerning the proposed demolition permit for the property at 607 East 38th Street. While my wife and I are not taking a position in favor of or against the proposed demolition permit, we would like to share the following information: The property at 607 East 38th Street is a duplex, and both units are currently occupied, and have been for some time. I don't know how the current eviction moratorium affects the proposed application for a demolition permit, but it may be a consideration. We have good neighbors in both units, and would hate to lose them, and hate to see them have to seek alternative affordable housing in this market. To the best of my knowledge, the current renters have not been informed by the city of the proposed demolition permit, and we would like to see them have that opportunity. The current property represents one of a dwindling number of affordable rental units in Central Austin. The duplex at 607 East 38th Street is a fairly typical craftsman style structure dating from the 1920s or 1930s. To the best of my knowledge, it is largely intact and unchanged. As such, it may be a contributing structure to a future application for a Historic District designation. It was formerly owned for many years by Texas Regionalist Artist and University of Texas Art Professor Michael Frary. Continuously occupied by renters throughout its history, the property is something of a "living museum" to the University of Texas community and the surrounding Hancock neighborhood, one of the city's oldest. Tenants have typically been from the university and creative communities, and have been likely to pay the rent out of the tip jar. Because the rent has always been relatively affordable, the property has attracted renters with more talent and education than money, a living reflection of the old Austin. Over the years, our neighbors have included musicians, writers, chefs and waitstaff, at least one craft brewer and at least one commercial artist. Demolition of the property will likely put …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Barbara Epstein Friday, January 21, 2022 12:48 PM PAZ Preservation HNA; e Case No. GF 22-001028 607 E. 38th St. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** This email serves as my protest to the demolition permit application for Case No. GF 22-001028 607 E. 38th St. I live within 500 feet of the property. Although this 1935 duplex is not a grand structure, it is representative of the modest multi-family housing built in the area at the time that continues to provide (badly needed) relatively affordable housing in our city core. When I looked online to search for photos (since I had never been inside), I was surprised to see what looks like remarkably well-preserved living space--- https://www.apartments.com/607-e-38th-st-austin-tx-unit-a/dv3k8rj/ The current owner is in San Antonio and according to his website https://habitathaus.com builds modern homes. When I spoke to the owner, Mr. Jorge Alzaga, he refused to commit in writing that any new structure he builds would blend in with the neighborhood’s historic architecture—or to put anything in writing at all before the demolition permit hearing. But anyone who looks at and purchases property in this neighborhood would see that it is predominately made up of historic architecture, so they either are interested in preserving it or only interested in making the most profit no matter what. If this demolition permit is granted, it will create a clear precedent to build much larger, incompatible housing to the lot line without adequate parking. (Mr. Alzaga has a permit on file to build a 4,004 sq. ft. two-story duplex, while the current one-story duplex is listed as having 1,582 sq. ft.) I am unaware of any duplex like the ones on the owner’s company website that have been proposed or built in this vicinity. This demolition permit would have a domino effect because the pressures are too great now to raze entire historic neighborhoods in the name of densification, while at the same time, our city has made it almost impossible for a homeowner to legally increase density by creating an affordable ADU in an existing detached structure.. (For example, by ordinance, [25-2-1463 (2)(b)] a detached garage cannot qualify as an ADU unless it is a second story unit, and is allowed only the one current driveway curb cut, even though an ADU requires an additional paved parking space.) This neighborhood is at a tipping …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION FRIDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2021 – 4:00 PM MEETING WILL BE HELD IN PERSON AT CITY HALL Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x x x x x x Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Anissa Castillo Witt Featherston Kevin Koch Carl Larosche x x x x ab Kelly Little Trey McWhorter Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright SPECIAL CALLED MEETING AGENDA CALL TO ORDER – 4:12 PM CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 15, 2021 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Little. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 9-0, Commissioner Castillo off the dais. 2. PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSION, AND POSSIBLE ACTION A. Recognition of Steve Sadowsky for his service to the City of Austin 1 MOTION: Send Commission sentiments in a letter to Mr. Sadowsky, on a motion by Commissioner Heimsath. Commissioner Valenzuela seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. B. Presentations, discussion, and possible recommendations to the Texas Historical Commission regarding National Register of Historic Places nominations on the January 15, 2022 State Board of Review agenda https://www.thc.texas.gov/sbrmeeting B.1. Clement’s Meat Market / The Sport Bar – 1200 E. 6th St. Council District 3 B.2. Chapel for the Children – 2203 W. 35th St. Council District 10 B.3. Parque Zaragoza – 2608 Gonzales St. Council District 3 Presenter: Kalan Contreras MOTION: Recommend all three Nominations to the Texas Historical Commission, on a motion by Commissioner Little. Commissioner Larosche seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Historic Zoning, Discussion and Action on Applications for Historic District Zoning, and Requests to Consider Initiation of Historic Zoning Cases A.1. No items. B. Discussion and Possible Action on Applications for Certificates of Appropriateness B.1. HR-2021-157034 – 3810 Duval St. – Consent (postponed November 15, 2021) Hyde Park Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Construct additions to contributing house and noncontributing ADU. Applicant: Michael Diani City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Committee Feedback: Make design changes to ensure …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: CLIFTON LADD Sunday, January 23, 2022 6:13 PM PAZ Preservation brenda Ladd Case number PR-2021-200516; GF 22-001167 for Demolition of 512 E Monroe; public hearing MONDAY, 1-24-22 at 6:00 PM Public Hearing Form Ladd.pdf; Untitled attachment 00035.htm; 512_E_Monroe_20220120-00 copy.jpeg; Untitled attachment 00038.htm; 512_E_Monroe_20220120-01 copy.jpeg; Untitled attachment 00041.htm Dear Ms. Allen ‐ I just left you a phone message a little while ago and would appreciate it if you could call me tomorrow. We received a notice of public hearing for an application for a demolition permit for 512 East Monroe St. while we were out of town January 16‐19, and I didn’t see it until Thursday the 20th. I don’t understand how the City of Austin could give less than one week notice before a public hearing for a demolition. I have made several attempts to find information about this proposed demolition at https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/permit/public‐search‐other using the case numbers listed in the notice (PR‐2021‐ 200516; GF 22‐001167), but it only returns the answer “No rows returned.” The sign announcing the public hearing was not posted on the property, as it was laying on the ground in the front yard when I went by to look on Thursday the 20th (see attached photo). This house is a good example of the architecture of the Travis Heights‐Fairview Park National Historic District. It is in very good condition and should be preserved as an important part of the neighborhood (see attached photo). I oppose the demolition of this valuable part of our historic neighborhood. Please contact me before the public hearing tomorrow night at 6:00. Thank you, Clifton Ladd 1509 Newning Avenue Please let me know if you have any information about this. ‐‐‐‐ Clif Ladd 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: John L Trowbridge Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:51 PM PAZ Preservation Review case number PR-2021-200516 | GF 22-001167 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Attn: AMBER ALLEN, Re: Review case number PR‐2021‐200516 | GF 22‐001167, I OBJECT to the requested demolition of the house structure @ 512 E Monroe St, Austin TX 78704. Public Hearing: Historic Landmark Commission, January 24th 2022 Review Case Number: GF 22‐001167 ‐ 512 E MONROE ST / PR‐2021‐200516 Contact: Amber Allen My name: John L Trowbridge My address: 508 E MONROE ST, Austin TX 78704 I reside within 500 feet of the property under review. I OBJECT to the requested demolition of the house structure @ 512 E Monroe St. My comments: I am property owner and resident of 508 E Monroe, the 2nd property west of 512. The former owner was my neighbor for 20 years. The current structure @ 512 is a charming bungalow with vintage architectural features, including exterior teardrop hardwood siding and interior shiplap walls. The house is structurally sound. It was built in 1928 with dense longleaf pine lumber, now almost 100 yrs old but with structural and aesthetic qualities superior to modern building materials. I oppose full demolition. I would love to see the new owner incorporate as much of the old structure as possible with whatever upgrade / expansion they need. A demolition at the property at the other end of the block @ 500 E Monroe was denied by this commission around 2008. After the builders completed the renovation, the house was designated as Austin’s 1st historic home to receive a 5‐Star green building rating. After renovations were completed the builder sent a letter of thanks to the very groups that opposed the demolition, as they received an abundance of praise and publicity and claimed that they ended up profiting more‐per‐square‐footage than they would have with an entirely new structure. The house next door at 502 E Monroe was later remodeled from 1 to 2 stories. I witnessed that home’s transformation which incorporated much of the original framing and enhanced the original charm still found in the dwindling number of older homes in the neighborhood. I’m also very concerned about the fate of 2 grand heritage Live Oak trees on the property, with trunk diameters of 53 & 44 inches. I’ve resided at my property in this neighborhood for 43 …
80 Rainey Historic Landmark Commission January 24, 2022 1 Project Team Developer: Architect: Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: Agent: Lincoln Ventures Pappageorge Haymes TBG Partners Wuest Group Drenner Group 2 Current Use Food truck lot, bar and small office. 3 < 7 8 R a i n e y 8 4 R a i n e y > 4 5 Paseo Connection to MACC 6 Paseo Connection to MACC 7 8 < 7 8 R a i n e y 8 4 R a i n e y > 9 10 Project Facts Address: Lot Size: Zoning: 78-84 Rainey Street 0.66 acres / 28,814 square feet Central Business District (CBD) Rainey Street Entitled Height: DDBP Allowable Height: Proposed Height: 40 feet Unlimited 546 feet / 49 floors CBD Zoning Entitled FAR: DDBP Allowable FAR: Proposed DDBP FAR: 8:1 15:1 20:1 On-Site Affordable Square Feet: Affordable Housing Trust Fund Contribution: 16,435 SF $1,052,273 11 12 Paseo gateway art by local artist 13 14 15 16 NORTHWEST VIEW 17 WEST VIEW 18 SOUTHWEST VIEW 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
3621 Windsor Tarrytown Case 1 Tarrytown Case Summary The owner has requested a demolition permit for 3621 Windsor Rd., a Tarrytown residence. 2 Tarrytown Case Summary The owner has requested a demolition permit for 3621 Windsor Rd., a Tarrytown residence. Staff has argued that the structure may meet the architectural and historic association criteria. 3 Tarrytown Case Summary The owner has requested a demolition permit for 3621 Windsor Rd., a Tarrytown residence. Staff has argued that the structure may meet the architectural and historic association criteria. However, the structure has been meaningfully expanded and changed over time – and staff’s basis for historic association raises equity-related policy questions. 4 This Tarrytown residence was owned by oilwoman philanthropist Alma Thomas. It was built in the late 1940s for $52,500 – roughly 12 times the median home value at that time. This is the structure as it existed the year Alma Thomas passed – it included a main house and servants’ quarters. 6 This is the structure as it today – meaningful work has been done to expand and change it. 7 Historic Association Rationale: Equity Implications Staff argues that Alma Thomas’ status as an oilwoman and local philanthropist is sufficient to warrant historic designation for this structure. 8 Historic Association Rationale: Equity Implications Staff argues that Alma Thomas’ status as an oilwoman and local philanthropist is sufficient to warrant historic designation for this structure. However, adopting this rationale would disproportionately favor historic designation in affluent West Austin, where residents had a much greater capacity to participate in large-scale philanthropy. 9 Historic Association Rationale: Equity Implications Staff argues that Alma Thomas’ status as an oilwoman and local philanthropist is sufficient to warrant historic designation for this structure. However, adopting this rationale would disproportionately favor historic designation in affluent West Austin, where residents had a much greater capacity to participate in large-scale philanthropy. This would also provide these affluent areas with tax exemptions and abatements. In other words, past wealth would be used as a basis for shifting today’s tax burden onto less affluent Austinites. 10 Already, there are six historic landmarks with a half-mile of this property. 11 Supporting Conditions Alma Thomas Has Been Appropriately Honored by Southwestern University. Southwestern University has honored Thomas with the Alma Thomas Fine Arts Center, connecting her to the work she did and the causes she supported. Alma Thomas’ Granddaughter Opposes Historic Designation. Thomas’ granddaughter has …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Epps, Patience L Saturday, January 22, 2022 8:25 AM PAZ Preservation Protest to the demolition permit application for Case No. GF 22-001028 607 E. 38th St. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Allen, I am emailing to protest the demolition permit application for Case No. GF 22‐001028 607 E. 38th St. I live within 500 feet of this property. This is a historic house that offers an affordable rental option, which is becoming more and more rare in our neighborhood. The planned demolition and new building will compromise the character of the neighborhood and will undoubtedly further limit the affordable housing options in the area. All best, Patience Epps 508 E 38 1/2 St Austin TX 78751 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
UPDATE: EQUITY-BASED HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Historic Landmark Commission – January 24, 2022 Photo: Joe’s Bakery, joesbakery.com bit.ly/ATXpresplan PROCESS GOAL Replace Austin’s 1981 preservation plan with an inclusive, equity-focused, and community- oriented process and outcome VISION Historic preservation in Austin actively engages communities in protecting and sharing important places and stories. Preservation uses the past to create a shared sense of belonging and to shape an equitable, inclusive, sustainable, and economically vital future for all. VISION Community heritage survey Nearly 170 responses VISION Community heritage survey Nearly 170 responses WORKING GROUP SCHEDULE Essential background and process April Processes and fees July ‘21 Introduction and goals May Outreach, education, engagement Aug Equity workshop Sept Decision-making Topics Oct Community heritage survey Vision for the plan / Heritage in Austin Nov Tangible heritage Dec Intangible heritage Feb ‘22 Incentives March Enforcement and protection Review and next steps June July Review recommendations Final review, next steps Focus group meetings: 1) Collect input for working group discussion 2) Get feedback on draft recommendations MEETING 4: HERITAGE IN AUSTIN MEETING 5: TANGIBLE HERITAGE MEETING 6: INTANGIBLE HERITAGE PROCESS Background presentation Discussion + direction Recommendations Drafting Committee Equity framework Working Group reviews draft recommendations + feedback Icons from the Noun Project: group by mikicon, hammer by David Khai Feedback on draft recommendations - Preservation Plan Comm. - Technical Advisory Group - Department leadership - Focus groups PROCESS Background presentation Discussion + direction Recommendations Drafting Committee Equity framework Working Group reviews draft recommendations + feedback Icons from the Noun Project: group by mikicon, hammer by David Khai Feedback on draft recommendations - Preservation Plan Comm. - Technical Advisory Group - Department leadership - Focus groups WORKING GROUP SCHEDULE Essential background and process April Processes and fees July ‘21 Introduction and goals May Outreach, education, engagement Review and next steps June July Review recommendations Final review, next steps Aug Equity workshop Sept Decision-making Topics Oct Vision for the plan / Heritage in Austin Nov Tangible heritage Dec Intangible heritage Feb ‘22 Incentives March Enforcement and protection MID-POINT CHECK-IN • 6 working group meetings • 4 focus group meetings • 900+ staff hours • 430+ hours from working group members • 30+ hours from focus group members MID-POINT CHECK-IN From mid-point working group survey: MID-POINT CHECK-IN What change(s) would you like to see to make the planning process more effective? • More focused discussions • Discussion of idealism vs. pragmatism in …
City of Austin - Design Commission Project Review Application The Design Commission provides advisory recommendations to the City Council to assist in developing public policy and to promote excellence in the design and development of the urban environment. The Design Commission reviews three types of projects: 1. City projects (see page ii for process) The Commission reviews all municipal buildings and associated site plans to ensure they demonstrate compliance with city design and sustainability standards (Council Resolution No. 20071129-046), including those seeking Subchapter E Design Standards Alternative Equivalent Compliance (AEC) (Council Resolution No. 20100923-086). 2. Destiny Bonus projects (see page iv for process) The Commission reviews density bonus projects for substantial compliance with the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin in accordance with the Gatekeeper requirements of LDC 25-2-586 for the Downtown Density Bonus Program. 3. Advisory Recommendations for Private projects (see page ii for process) The Commission will consider Project Review Applications from private projects during its regularly scheduled monthly public meetings and may issue an advisory recommendation in the form of a Project Review Letter to the Applicant. This Project Review Application must be submitted before your project can be presented to the Design Commission for their review. Design Commission requests project be presented in their Conceptual/Schematic Design phase. This application primarily addresses inhabited buildings and structures and their effect on the public realm; please refer to Appendix A for infrastructure type projects. The Commission's review of projects is based on the planning/design principles in the Urban Design Guidelines for Austin. Ensure that all applicable principles are addressed in the application questions and in your presentation. https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Boards_and_Commissions/ Design_Commission_urban_design_guidelin es_for_austin.pdf The Design Commission supports the vision and principles of Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan, especially those that affect the urban environment and fabric. All projects should consider this vision and principles, many of which are similar to the Urban Design Guidelines. Refer to Appendix C for the most pertinent sections of Imagine Austin. The Design Commission expects the applicant’s design team to present their project with those most knowledgeable and encourages the inclusion of sub-consultants at the presentation, when deemed necessary. EXHIBITS TO PRESENT 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) Completed Project Review Application (p.1-6) Existing zoning classification, adjacent zoning & uses, future land use map classification, topography Vicinity plan, including public transportation and connectivity on-site and within quarter mile Site plan and landscape plan Ground level, basement …
DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, January 24, 2022 6:00 PM Austin City Hall, Boards & Commissions, Room 1101 301 W 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 David Carroll, Chair (District 1) Vacant (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Melissa Henao-Robledo (District 5) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) CURRENT MEMBERS: Jen Weaver (District 6) Jessica Rollason Vice-Chair (District 7) Aan Coleman (District8) Bart Whatley (District9) Ben Luckens (District10) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion & Possible Action): a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center (ESB-MACC) Phase 2 project, located at 600 River Street, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Heidi Tse and Mari Boren City of Austin Public Works Department. b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the Waterloo Greenway – Creek Delta project, located at Waller Creek, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards, for the City of Austin; Melissa Ayala and Chris Perkes Waterloo Greenway, Diana Wang City of Austin Waller Creek District Program. 2. COMMISSION-SPECIFIC BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): a. Approval of the December 13th meeting minutes b. Discussion and Possible Action on recent Council approval to update the Urban Design Guidelines c. Discussion and Possible Action related to the current Urban Design Guidelines Working Group d. Update from representative on the Downtown Commission regarding last meeting e. Update from representative on the Joint Sustainability committee regarding last meeting f. Update from representative on the South-Central Waterfront Advisory Board 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS: a. Chair Announcements; b. c. Items from Commission Members; Items from City Staff; 4. ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before the meeting date. Please contact Aaron Jenkins in the Planning and Zoning Department Aaron.Jenkins@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-2752, for additional information. TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711 Design Commission: Committees, Working Groups, Representatives and Liaisons 1. Executive …
DESIGN COMMISSION Monday, December 13, 2021 4:00 PM Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, TX 78752 Meeting Minutes Call to order by: Chair D. Carroll at 4:06 p.m. X X X X Member List David Carroll – Chair (District 1) Jessica Rollason – Vice-Chair (District 7) Vacant (District 2) Samuel Franco (District 3) Josue Meiners (District 4) Evan Taniguchi (Mayor) X Melissa Hanao-Robledo (District 5) X X Jen Weaver (District 6) Aan Coleman (District 8) Bart Whatley (District 9) Ben Luckens (District 10) “X” Denote Commission Members who were in attendance CITY OF AUSTIN HOUSING AND PLANNING STAFF X Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison X Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison X Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: None. 1. NEW BUSINESS (Discussion and Possible Action): Chairman Carroll has recused himself from this item and has relinquish Chairman duties to Commissioner Taniguchi for Item 1.a. a. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether 80 Rainey, located at 80 Rainey Street, complies with the Urban Design Guidelines for the city of Austin; Amanda Swor Drenner Group; Gregory Klosowski Pappageorge Haymes; Chris Jackson TBG Partners; Scott Wuest Wuest Group. • Pawel Hardej with Lincoln Ventures, Amanda Swor with Drenner Group, Gregory Klosowski Pappageorge Haymes; Chris Jackson TBG Partners; and Scott Wuest Wuest Group presented and addressed questions. Page 1 of 4 • Commissioner S. Franco made a motion to approve that the project substantially complies with the Urban Design Guidelines Commissioner J. Meiners seconded. • The motion was approved [6 ayes, 0 nays, 1 Recuse (D. Carroll)] b. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether City of Austin-Bergstrom International Airport AUS Cargo Development East located at 9402 Freight Lane, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards for the City of Austin; David Smythe-Macaulay Austin-Bergstrom International Airport • David Smythe-Macaulay COA-ABIA staff presented and addressed questions. • The Design Commission provided feedback and recommendations for the project, but no action was taken. c. Discussion and possible action to evaluate and make recommendations regarding whether the 51st Street Revitalization Project located at 51st Street, complies with the City Design and Sustainability Standards for the City of Austin; Andrew Wong City of Austin Public Works Department • Andrew Wong, COA Public Works and Angel-Lina Soutdarany, Atkins and Jill Fagan, Economic Development presented and addressed questions. • Commissioner J. Weaver made a motion to approve …
Waterloo Greenway Creek Delta Project Update Design Commission Meeting December 13, 2021 1 Agenda 1. Waterloo Greenway Program Overview 2. Creek Delta Project Update 3. Possible Action: Request Support for Creek Delta Project & Recommendation to Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit 2 Program Overview Sponsoring City Departments: Watershed Protection Department & Parks and Recreation Department Non-Profit Partner: Waterloo Greenway Conservancy 3 4 Community Programming 5 OUTREACH OVERVIEW • • Feb 2018 – Waller Creek public meetings at MACC June 2018 – School field trip collaboration: Waller Creek/MACC • Aug 2018 – Tabling at trail: Waller Creek/MACC Feb 2019 – Tabling at Austin Energy meeting at • MACC • May 2019 – Environment Commission presentation • Summer 2019 – Presentation at Rainey neighborhood meeting at MACC Sept 2019 – Tabling at MACC ”¡Viva México!” event • Sept 2019 – Presentation at HQOL Commission • • Oct 2019 – Presentation at District 9 Rainey Street Historic District Visioning Meeting • Nov 2019 – Tabling at MACC “Día de Los Muertos” • event Feb 2020 – Palm District: R/UDAT Community/Project Area Tour • March 2020 – MACC Advisory Board meeting presentation • March 2020 – MACC Advisory Board meeting presentation Jan 2021 – MACC Advisory Board meeting • • March 2021 – MACC Working Group meeting Jan 2021 – Rainey Street Neighborhood • presentation Sept 2021 – Environment Commission presentation • • Oct 2021 – Parks and Recreation Board presentation • Nov 2021 – Creek Show at Waterloo Park 66 7 Creek Delta • • • • Located along Waller Creek between Lady Bird Lake and 4th Street Identified in Council- approved Waller Creek Design Plan Approximate 10-acre project area. Creek restoration, 1 mile of new trails, pedestrian bridges, water quality and utility improvements Preparing 100% construction documents, anticipated by December 2021 8 9 Moving away from the convention of hard engineering solutions… 10 …toward soft engineering solutions 11 Environmental Goals Functional Assessment (Environmental Criteria Manual) • • Water Quality - Biofiltration Pond and Inline Stormwater Treatment • Trees o Vegetation and Soil Protection Zones o Enhanced tree mitigation and planting Sustainable SITES Certification • 12 Connectivity & Mobility 13 Elevated Walkway + Bridges 2 3 1 *Lattice Bridge 3 is currently an add/bid alternate. * 14 Lattice Bridges 15 15 Elevated Walkway 16 Cypress Grove + Trailhead Plaza 17 Lagoon Overlook + Leaf Deck 18 Lagoon Overlook + Leaf Deck 19 …
EXHIBIT 2 - ZONING & TOPOGRAPHY E 5TH ST E 5TH ST T S S E H C E N E 4TH ST T R S E D RIV E R T S S O Z A R B E 3RD ST T Y S NIT RI T E 2ND ST D LV O B T N I C N JA A S T S E BIN A S E 6TH ST T E S BIN A S B 5 S N IH 3 E 3RD ST B D S R V 5 S N IH 3 B 5 N N IH 3 B D N R V 5 S N IH 3 E 3RD ST T E S N I B A S E CESAR CHAVEZ ST SUBJECT SITE (LOC) +/- 13.07 Acres T Y S H S U R B DRISKILL ST WILLOW ST DAVIS ST T Y S E AIN R E V T A S A E RIVER ST WILLOW ST T S S O C R A N M A S SPENCE ST TAYLOR ST Waller Creek from 4th St to the Colorado River Austin, Travis County, Texas 0 150 300 30174001.05 | 09.04.2019 | BIGREDDOG.COM 600 Feet I CBD CBD-CURE CBD CBD CBD E 5TH ST CBD CBD CBD E 4TH ST CBD CBD E 3RD ST CBD CBD T Y S NIT RI T CBD CBD CBD CBD T S S O Z A R B CBD CBD CBD CBD-CURE CBD CBD CBD E 2ND ST D LV O B T N I C N JA A S CBD CBD CBD CBD E 5TH ST P-H P CBD-H CBD CBD CBD CBD-H CBD CBD T S S E H C E N CBD-CURE CBD CBD T R S E D RIV E R CBD CBD-H CBD CBD CBD CBD-H CBD CBD-CURE T E S N I B A S GR-H E CESAR CHAVEZ ST CBD-CURE CBD DMU CBD CBD-CURE CS WILLOW ST DRISKILL ST CBD CBD DAVIS ST CBD T Y S E AIN R CBD P CBD T S E BIN A S CBD CBD CBD CBD-H CBD CBD-H E 6TH ST CBD T E S BIN A S CBD CBD B 5 S N IH 3 CBD B D S R V 5 S N IH 3 E 3RD ST UNZ UNZ TOD-CURE-NP TOD-NP TOD-NP TOD-NP SF-3-NP B 5 N N …
A. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name The Death Star Project Type: Infrastructure Private project Other City building & site Density bonus Project Location/Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Galactic Empire, Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Darth Vader, Sith Lord Property Owner Darth Vader, Sith Applicant Mailing Address 1Imperial Avenue Austin, TX 78704 Applicant Telephone Number 999-999-9999 Property Owner Mailing Address 1 Imperial Avenue, Austin, TX 78704 Property Owner Telephone Number 999-999-9999 Project Start Date January 2017 Project Completion Date March 2018 Applicant’s Architect Darth Vader, Sith Lord; ABC Architect Applicant’s Engineer Darth Vader, Sith Lord Engineering Company Design Commission - Project Review Application 1 of 6 1] Indicate if proposed Project is required by City Ordinance to be reviewed by the Design Commission. Yes, the project is required to be reviewed by the Design Commission. 2] Describe the recommendation that you are requesting from the Design Commission. We are looking for a recommendation of support from the Design Commission for the project as well as Alternative Equivalent Compliance for setbacks and missing sidewalks. 3] Current Design Phase of Project (Design Commission prefers to see projects right after approved schematic design). Schematic design phase 4] Is this Project subject to Site Plan and/or Zoning application approvals? Will it be presented to Planning Commission and/or City Council? If so, when? Yes, the project is subject to Site Plan approvals and Zoning approvals. We anticipate presenting to the Planning Commission in mid-May and City Council in late June. 5] Does this Project comply with Land Development Code Subchapter E? List specifically any Alternative Equivalent Compliance request if any. Please refer to website for Alternate Equivalent Compliance (AEC) requirements. https://www.municode.com/library/tx/austin/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT25LADE_CH25- 2ZO_SUBCHAPTER_EDESTMIUS Yes, the project generally complies with SubChapter E with 8 foot sidewalks, street trees, and street furniture. However, we need alterative Equivalent Compliance for encroachment into setbacks. Design Commission - Project Review Application 2 of 6 B. PROJECT BACKGROUND 6] Provide project background including goals, scope, building/planning type, and schedule. Broadly address each of the “Shared Values for Urban Areas” that are listed on Page 6 of the Urban Design Guidelines. Attach additional pages as needed. The Empire will rule the entire galaxy with ruthless power. They will crush the Rebellion and Skywalker will become one of them. 7] Has this project conducted community/stakeholder outreach? If so, please provide documentation to demonstrate community/stakeholder support of this project. Yes, the project has conducted 6 months of community outreach …
CITY OF AUSTIN DESIGN COMMISSION DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220124-1B January 28, 2022 Date: Subject: Design Commission recommendation for the Waterloo Greenway- Creek Delta project, located at Waller Creek. Commissioner Taniguchi Seconded By: Commissioner Whatley Motioned By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that Waterloo Greenway – Creek Delta project, as presented to us on January 24, 2022, complies with the City of Austin’s Design and Sustainability Standards. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the Waterloo Greenway – Creek Delta project, as presented to us. Our review found the following positive attributes: 1. Proposed design will achieve Sustainable Sites Certification. 2. Project conducted extensive community outreach. 3. Proposed design will enhance tree planting. 4. Proposed design will help mitigate erosion and protect soil and vegetation. 5. Project will enhance pedestrian connectivity across the creek with elevated walkways and bridges. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Chair Carroll, Commissioner Salinas, Commissioner Franco, Commissioner Meiners, Commissioner Henao- 11- 0 - 0 Robledo, Commissioner Taniguchi, Commissioner Weaver, Vice-Chair Rollason, Commissioner Coleman, Commissioner Whatley, Commissioner Luckens. Against: n/a Attest: David Carroll, Chair City of Austin Design Commission 1 of 1 Melissa Henao-Robledo David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Jon Salinas Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison Design Commission Recommendation 20220124-1B Waterloo Greenway Creek Delta Project
David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Jon Salinas Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins, Staff Liaison Art Zamorano, Staff Liaison CITY OF AUSTIN DESIGN COMMISSION DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20220124-1A January 28, 2022 Date: Subject: Design Commission recommendation for the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Phase 2 project, located at 600 Red River. Seconded By: Vice-Chair Rollason Commissioner Franco Commissioner Coleman Motioned By: Amended By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Phase 2 project, as presented to us on January 24, 2022, complies with the City of Austin’s Design and Sustainability Standards. This endorsement comes with the additional recommendation that a stronger pedestrian connection be made between the Butler Hike & Bike Trail and Rainey Street and that this connection does not have to pass through the building or the Zocalo. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Phase 2 project, as presented to us. Our review found the following positive attributes: 1. Proposed design reflects the community’s input from a thorough outreach effort. 2. Proposed design has a stronger relationship to the Hike & Bike Trail than current design. 3. Addition is great solution to preserving the existing structure, while better defining the zocalo, and creating a 4. Proposed design will change grade of Hike & Bike Trail, making it more accessible. 5. Heritage trees will be preserved onsite. powerful statement. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Chair Carroll, Commissioner Salinas, Commissioner Franco, Commissioner Meiners, Commissioner Henao- 11- 0 - 0 Robledo, Commissioner Taniguchi, Commissioner Weaver, Vice-Chair Rollason, Commissioner Coleman, Commissioner Whatley, Commissioner Luckens. Against: n/a Attest: David Carroll, Chair City of Austin Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20220124-1A Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Phase 2 Project
