Water Forward Implementation Progress Update and Supply Outlook 6/15/2021 Current Water Supplies 025,00050,00075,000100,000125,000150,000175,000200,000225,000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAcre-FeetHighland Lakes InflowsAverage 1942 - PresentAverage 2008 - 20152021 LCRA Lake Levels Forecast Possible COA Stage 1 Drought Restrictions Possible COA Stage 2 Drought Restrictions Possible COA Stage 3 Drought Restrictions https://www.lcra.org/download/combined-storage-of-lakes-buchanan-and-travis/?wpdmdl=9375&refresh=60c24207690e11623343623 Water Forward 2018 Implementation Progress Continued Planning for Water Forward 2023 Update ASR Chartering, Data Gathering, and Technical Work continue AMI meter installations continue Implementation of other Water Forward Strategies QUESTIONS
WINTER STORM EVENT BRIEFING Water Forward Task Force | June 15th 2021 Bill Relief Rate Reduction Monthly Fee Reduction Bill Adjustments Wastewater Averaging Emergency Cut-off Fees Waived Bill Relief Estimated Reads reads Meter read data review averaging adjustments Wastewater Average • February/March bills based on estimated reads • March/April bills based on actual reads beginning March 19 • Residential rates reduced temporarily to mitigate high bills resulting from catch up • Review of actual reads to proactively apply leak adjustments and wastewater • Estimated consumption will apply to wastewater averaging calculation to mitigate wastewater average concerns Bill Relief Residential Rate Relief • Temporary rate relief savings - $4,585,335 Commercial and Multifamily Bill Adjustments • Commercial bill adjustments applied - $953,091 • Multi-family bill adjustments applied - $1,052,600 Total Relief as of 5/31/21: Over $6.5 Million Other Relief Emergency Home Repair Program • Committed $1 million for emergency plumbing repairs Plus 1 Payment Assistance Funding • Providing additional $5 million in residential payment assistance funding Community Recovery Plumbing Repair Coordination Public Water Stations Bulk Water Hauling Distribution Fixed Location Tank Water Totes (275-gallon) Distribution Next Steps Enterprise Resiliency Strategic Initiatives After Action Report Questions and Discussion Water Forward Task Force | June 15th 2021
Versión en español a continuación Construction Advisory Committee Meeting June 15, 2021 Construction Advisory Committee to be held June 15, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (June 14, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the Construction Advisory Committee Meeting, members of the public must: •Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-3957 and shelley.franklin@austintexas.gov no later than noon, June 14, 2021. The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). •Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. •Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. •Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. •Handouts or other information may be emailed to shelley.franklin@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. •If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn- live Reunión del Comité Asesor de Construcción 15 de junio de 2021 La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (14 de junio de 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los miembros del público deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-3957 y shelley.franklin@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y un número de teléfono (debe ser el número que se utilizará para llamar ). • Una vez que se haya realizado una …
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 F E D C B A O V N O V E D - I \ I I I \ I I I . G W D T B H X E N A L P D O O L F A R E V R T B H X E D A C A R E V R D N A E N L E K A L S R E N T R A P L H O P I I \ I \ \ : J - M A 3 4 : 6 3 : 9 1 2 0 2 / 8 2 / 5 D L R D MIL L O W R I V I E R A D R S R I V I E R A C I R C L E SUBJECT SITE AREA EXISTING FEMA FLOODPLAIN EXISTING CREEK CENTERLINE PROVIDED BY FEMA GIS AVAILABLE DATA S L A K E L I N E B L V D R I D G E L I N E B L V D CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE PER CITY OF AUSTIN GIS DATA N 0 100' 200' 400' SCALE: 1'' = 200' NOTES: 1. 2. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE "AE" ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48491C0605F, HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 20, 2019 FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. ZONE DETERMINATION WAS DONE BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING FROM THE FEMA MAP. WE DO NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXACT DETERMINATION. EXISTING FLOODPLAIN WAS MAPPED UTILIZING EXISTING GIS DATA PROVIDED BY FEMA NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) FOR WILLIAMSON COUNTY CORRELATED TO CURRENT FEMA MAP FIRM NO. 48491C0605F WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 20, 2019. PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT PURPOSES. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF WILLIAM E. PARNELL, P.E. #121598 ON May 28, 2021 g n i r e e n g n e i l l e n r a p 6 6 5 9 1 - F . I I O N M R F N O T A R T S G E R S A X E T I i m o c . c n g n i r e e n g n e i l l e n r a p S …
*This draft incorporates initial feedback received as of 6/14/21. More feedback is being gathered. Changes will be presented to the Pandemic Equity Committee for consideration and final approval. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Austin Mayor, City Council Members, and City Manager FROM: Central Health Equity Policy Council - Pandemic Equity Committee (Brandon Wollerson, Catalina Berry, Emily Zhang, Iliana Gilman, Kristin duBay Horton, Matthew Jeans, Nora Comstock, Patricia Hayes, Raul Alvarez, Vanessa Sarria, and Vince Cobalis) DATE: XXXXXX, 2021 SUBJECT: Recommendations for Identifying and Addressing Inequities in Disaster Preparedness, Disaster Response and Post- Disaster Community Healing and Recovery As we begin to approach the end of this global pandemic, we’d like to recognize the work that has been undertaken by the City of Austin to help our community navigate it, including the strong collaboration that has taken place between community organizations and entities responsible for disaster response. The nation was hit last year with a crisis for which we were ill-prepared, and the healing that is ahead of us will be yet another challenge. In addition to showing us how interconnected our lives are, this pandemic has shown us the significant challenges that our society and our local community are facing. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the inequities People of Color, including Asian American, Black, Indigenous, and Hispanic/Latino Communities, and other historically marginalized populations (including, but not limited to LGTBQIA, the elderly, remote geographically, people living with disabilities) experience daily and the opportunities for the City to adequately prepare for disasters. It is imperative that these inequities be addressed prior to any subsequent catastrophe. Before getting too deep into the analysis, it is important to note that disparate outcomes during the pandemic for People of Color and low-income families could have been significantly lessened, if there was equitable access to health care/insurance, technology, and economic opportunity in our community. In December 2020, Central Health’s Equity Policy (CHEP) Council convened the Pandemic Equity Committee to assess health outcomes related to the pandemic and develop recommendations to help ensure that decision-making regarding our community’s disaster preparedness, disaster response, and post-disaster community healing and recovery meaningfully accounts for existent and emergent disparities experienced by People of Color, including Asian American, Black, Indigenous and Hispanic/Latino Communities, and other historically marginalized populations. After several months of assessment, dialogue and deliberation, the Pandemic Equity Committee has developed the attached “recommendations for …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Rivera, Andrew Rhoades, Wendy Re: Case #C14-2021-0089 Monday, June 14, 2021 12:01:12 PM We ask for the postponement to gather data on the plans for the property and also to inform the neighbors. I have called the broker, but they have not responded yet which does not provide time for an informed decision. July 20th is preferred. On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:29 AM Rivera, Andrew <Andrew.Rivera@austintexas.gov> wrote: Please provide a postponement request including the reason for the postponement and the postponement date (available dates below). Thank you! Hello Ms. Newman: Thank you for your email. July 6, 2021 July 20, 2021 August 3, 2021 Thank you, Andrew Should the applicant agree to the postponement date, the item will be proposed on the consent agenda for postponement to a date certain. Should the applicant not agree to the date, the Commission will consider whether or not to grant the postponement (will hear from 2 individuals for and against the postponement at 2min each). From: Gigi Newman Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 9:55 AM To: Rivera, Andrew <Andrew.Rivera@austintexas.gov> Subject: Re: Case #C14-2021-0089 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Sorry - I forgot the other details. I would like to object to the rezoning of the above case. Also, my cell is . Address is 2405 Drew Ln, Austin, TX 78748 Thanks G Good Morning, Best, Gigi On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 9:41 AM Gigi Newman wrote: I would like to register regarding to zoning request. Additionally, how do I formally request an extension? CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
Opposition Item B-2 (C14-2021-0003) Sun Auto My name is William (Trey) Neinast and I live at 1000 S. Riviera Cir. in Cedar Park, TX with my wife and my nearly two-year-old son. While I am a Cedar Park resident and therefore not technically a resident of the City of Austin, I am one of the property owners who would be most affected by this change as my home backs up directly to the parcel of land in question. Myself and my family are in opposition to this proposed zoning change. Three Main Points: 1) The current zoning is fair and appropriate per both the applicant and staff. 2) The Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan has several policies that are not in alignment with this proposed zoning change. 3) At least one study has found that home proximity to auto repair shops is linked with an increased likelihood for childhood leukemia. Point 1 (Current Zoning is Fair and Appropriate) • The zoning for this parcel of land was last reviewed by the City of Austin in 2013. The applicant proposed a zoning change from SF-6 to GR but was granted a zoning of LR instead. (Reference 1: (http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=193776)) • The applicant agreed that the LR zoning was appropriate. (Reference 1) • While Austin has undergone many changes over the last several years, this specific area has not. The description of the current site characteristics, adjacent land development and uses, and relevant roadways is virtually identical between the 2013 zoning review and the 2021 review. (Reference 1 and Reference 2: (http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=362047)) • The only difference between 2013 and now regarding this specific area is that an apartment complex that was under construction in 2013 is now complete and operational as of 2021. (Reference 1 and 2) • There is an error in the 2021 Zoning Review document. It is stated that the Cedar Park portion of this land is currently zoned as Local Retail – Conditional Overlay. This is not true. The City of Cedar Park Planning and Zoning commission reviewed a proposal to change this portion of land from Medium Density Residential to Local Retail in August 2020 and did not approve this change. The proposal was withdrawn from City Council on 12/3/20 and has not been taken back up for consideration since. The part of this land in Cedar Park is currently zoned for Medium Density Residential. (Reference 3: (https://meetings.municode.com/d/f?u=https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi. net/cptx-pubu/MEET-Minutes-f40998be20254cf690f5df46f4331853.pdf&n=Minutes- …
June 14, 2021 Zoning and Platting Commission City of Austin RE: Letter of Opposition to Item B-3, 11705 Research Blvd.; Rezoning Case C14-2020-0146 Dear Commissioners: We are opposed to the rezoning of 11705 Research Boulevard until there is a plan to solve the serious traffic congestion and safety issues on the adjacent portion of the US Highway 183 NB service road. The headquarters of our organization, the Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. (TASB), is located just 0.3 miles northbound from the subject property, adjacent to the same service road. Our employees, tenants, and visitors already have a difficult time safely entering and exiting the parking lot with the high traffic volumes and crossing three lanes of traffic to get onto the on-ramp for the highway, and this situation will worsen if the proposed rezoning were approved. In 1990, the City Council approved the rezoning of the property to LI-CO, with conditions that reflected traffic concerns at that time. Now, nearly 30 years later, those concerns are substantially worse, and yet the applicant is requesting to lift much of the conditional overlay even though the population of the metropolitan area has increased from 846,227 in 1990 to 2,295,303 as of 2020. To summarize our concerns: 1. The General Warehousing and Distribution, Equipment Sales, and Equipment Repair Services uses should be prohibited on the entire property, since these uses would likely increase the volume of large trucks on the frontage road. 2. The projected traffic from the redevelopment of the larger overall 3M property is 16,136 trips per day. Because the property is just one portion of the overall 3M property, a decision on the proposed rezoning should consider the impact of the redevelopment of the entire 3M property, and there should be increased protections against traffic issues—not fewer. 3. The conditional overlay setting a maximum height of 40 feet should remain in place; otherwise there could be a more intensive development, which would further exacerbate the traffic issues. 4. We have seen no plan that would actually address the traffic issues, and the rezoning should be denied until there is a proven solution that is required to be implemented. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James. B. Crow Executive Director Concerns Regarding the Proposed Rezoning of a Portion of the 3M Property 11705 Research Blvd. (C14-2020-0146) The Zoning and Platting Commission June 15, 2021 Item B-3 Micah King (Husch Blackwell …
MEMORANDUM ************************************************************************ TO: FROM: Sherri Sirwaitis Zoning and Platting Commission Members Housing and Planning Department DATE: June 14, 2021 RE: C14-2020-0146 (11705 Research Blvd Zoning) Postponement Request ************************************************************************ The staff would like to request a postponement of the above mentioned case to July 6, 2021. The staff requires additional time to finalize our review of a new Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) that includes this property so we can provide this related information for the Commission’s review. The postponement request was made in a timely manner and meets the Zoning and Platting Commission’s policy.
June 15, 2021 Zoning and Planning Commission Question and Answer Report Commissioner King / Staff Response (blue): 1. Will the regulations adopted by Walnut Creek Neighborhood Association for hours of operation and distance to residences for mobile food vendors apply to this case if the recommended GR zoning, with or without the recommended conditional overlay, is approved by Council? 2. Given LO zoning on the adjacent property immediately north of this site, will any setbacks or screening be required for mobile food vending, restaurant, motel, or hotel uses on this site? 3. Will drive-thru fast food use be allowed on this site based on the recommended GR zoning, with or without the recommended conditional overlay? B-4 1. Yes, as the neighborhood has opted in to the additional Mobile Food Vendor Regulations per LDC Sec. 25-2-812. These regulations are Code requirements and therefore do not need to be repeated in the conditional overlay for the property. 2. Screening and fencing are required between residential and commercial uses per Compatibility Requirements. This does not apply between office and commercial uses. 25-2-1066 -SCREENING REQUIREMENTS (A) A person constructing a building shall screen each area on a property that is used for a following activity from the view of adjacent property that is in an urban residence (SF-5) or more restrictive zoning district: (1) off-street parking; (2) the placement of mechanical equipment; (3) storage; or (4) refuse collection. (B) A person constructing shoreline access, as that term is defined in Section 25-2-1172 (Definitions), shall screen the shoreline access from the view of property that is in an urban residence (SF-5) or more restrictive zoning district. A person may comply with this Subsection by providing vegetation and tree canopy as prescribed by rule, and may supplement compliance with other screening methods prescribed by rule. The owner must maintain the screening provided under this section. (C) A person may comply with Subsection (A) by providing a yard, fence, berm, or vegetation. If a fence is provided, the height of the fence may not exceed six feet, except as otherwise permitted by Section 25-2-899 (Fences As Accessory Uses). (D) The owner must maintain a fence, berm, or vegetation provided under this section. 3. Drive-In Services has not been recommended as a prohibited use on the site. However, the Commission could add this to the proposed conditional overlay if it chooses.
Zoning and Platting Commission Registered Speakers B1 Applicant - Victoria Haase Ron Thrower Opposed Gigi Numan Scott Jerrett Ani Jarrett B2 Applicant - Jennie Braasch Will Parnell Opposed Trey Neinast B3 Applicant - Amanda Swor Brad Maples Kevin Brook Opposed Richard Bean Dan Wittliff Steven Schrader Charlie Ford Micah King Kevin Perry B4 Applicant For Robert Meadows B5 Applicant B6 Applicant
ASIAN AMERICAN QUALITY OF LIFE ADVISORY COMMISSION (AAQOLAC) SPECIAL CALLED MEETING MINUTES OF TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2021 The AAQOLAC convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, May 27, 2021 Chair Yoshida called the Commission Meeting to order at 6:22 p.m. Commission Members in Attendance: Pooja Sethi, Sarah Chen, Kirk Yoshida, Hanna Huang, Shubhada Saxena, Molly Wang, Fang Fang, and Debasree DasGupta Staff in Attendance: Joshua Robinson, Equity & Inclusion Program Coordinator (Equity Office) Citizen Communication: N/A 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Commission moved to approve minutes from AAQOLAC meeting on April 20, 2021. Commissioner Cobalis motioned. Commissioner Huang seconded. Vote was 8-0. 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Workgroup/Project Reports 1. Asian American Resource Center (AARC) Workgroup – Update in the backup documents 2. Health and Community Engagement Workgroup – Commissioner Saxena provided an update. 3. Arts & Culture Workgroup – No update provided 4. Human Resources Workgroup – No update provided 5. Business Planning Workgroup – No update provided 6. Public Safety / Policing Project – No update provided 7. Community Stakeholder Nomination Project – No update provided b. Update on the Joint Inclusion Committee Meeting – Commissioner Cobalis provided an update. 1. Update on the AARC Master Plan – Chair Yoshida provided an update. Update also provided in the backup materials. 2. Update on the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget Recommendation Process – Chair Yoshida and Commissioner Cobalis provided an update. c. Follow-up Items: 3. STAFF BRIEFING None this month 4. NEW BUSINESS a. Update on the North Austin Universal Health Clinic and its contract with the City for mental health services (Dr. Malpani) – Dr. Malpani provided a presentation on the North Austin Universal Health Clinic. b. Discussion and possible action on the following Chair appointments: i. Winter Storm Review Task Force – Commissioner Wang provide update on the work on the Winter Storm Review Task Force ii. Joint Inclusion Committee (JIC) – Commissioner Cobalis will be the representative on the JIC and Commissioner Huang as the alternate. iii. AARC Work Group –Commissioner Cobalis will serve as the lead for the AARC Work Group. c. Discussion and possible action on equitable funding for the Greater Austin Asian Chamber of Commerce – Commission did not take action. d. Discussion and possible action on a revised FY 2022 budget recommendation for an additional full-time staff position at the Equity Office – Commission voted last week on this item. 5. INFORMATION SHARING …
Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force REGULAR MEETING June 15th , 2021 The Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force convened in a Regular on June 15th , 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications. Members in Attendance: Perry Lorenz Todd Bartee Diane Kennedy (L) Bill Moriarty Hani Michel Vanessa Puig-Williams Jennifer Walker – Vice Chair Sarah Faust Robert Mace Ex-Officio Members in Attendance: Kevin Critendon, Liana Kallivoka, Matt Hollon, Tony Davee, Lucia Athens Staff in Attendance: Jaynell Nicholson, Marisa Flores Gonzalez, Joseph Gonzales __________________________________________________________________________________ 1. CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Walker called the meeting to order at 3:03pm. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL David Foster 2. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES The minutes from the May 7th, 2021 Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force regular meeting were approved on Member Mace’s motion and Member Puig-Williams’s second for a final 6-0-0-2 vote. 3. STAFF BRIEFINGS, PRESENTATIONS, AND/OR REPORTS a. Water Forward Implementation Progress Update and Water Supply Outlook- Austin Water Staff, Jaynell Nicholson provided a briefing. b. Water Forward Code Amendments and Related City Council Resolutions- Austin Water Staff, Marisa Flores-Gonzalez provided a briefing. c. Winter Storm Event- Bill Relief – Austin Water Staff Joseph Gonzales provided a briefing. d. Advisory Group and Task Force Subcommittee Reports- Austin Water Staff, Jaynell Nicholson provided a briefing. a. Ordinance Subcommittee b. c. Climate Technical Advisory Group Indirect Potable Reuse Subcommittee 4. VOTING ITEMS- no voting items 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS a. Water Forward 2023Planning Progress b. Winter Storm Event- Community Response and Communication c. Water Conservation Program Overview 6. ADJOURN Page 1 of 1 Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force REGULAR MEETING June 15th , 2021 Vice Chair Walker adjourned the meeting at 5:31 pm. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please contact Austin Integrated Water Resource Planning Community Task Force liaison Marisa Flores Gonzalez at 512-972-0194, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. Page 2 of 2
Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes May 10, 2021 (Versión en español a continuación) Board of Adjustment to be held May 10, 2021 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (May 9, 2021 by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the May 10, 2021 Board of Adjustment Meeting, members of the public must: Call or email the board liaison at 512-974-2202 or elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (May 9, 2021 the day before the meeting). The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). Once a request to speak has been made to the board liaison, the information to call on the day of the scheduled meeting will be provided either by email or phone call. Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start time in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. If the meeting is broadcast live, it may be viewed here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Minutos del Reunión del Board of Adjustment - FECHA de la reunion (May 10, 2021) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social. Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (May 9, 2021 antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunion May 10, 2021, los miembros del público deben: Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en 512-974-2202 o elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (May 9, 2021 el día antes de la reunión). Se requiere la siguiente información: nombre del orador, número (s) de artículo sobre el que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutral, dirección de correo electrónico (opcional) y …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-1 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 DATE: May 10, 2021 ___-____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___-____Melissa Hawthorne ABSTAINING ___Y____Don Leighton-Burwell ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___-____Vacant ___-____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non-electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building.(G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting sign for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. C-1/1 BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining); Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021; March 8, 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Veronica Rivera motions to Postpone to April 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-0 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained); POSTPONED TO APRIL 12, 2021. (RENOTICE) VARIANCE REQUESTED: RENOTICE APRIL 12, 2021 cancelled due to technical problems with notification database; May 10, 2021 POSTPONED TO JUNE 14, 2021 DUE TO LACK OF BOARD MEMBERS/VOTES BOARD’S DECISIONFINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-1 CASE NUMBER: C15-2020-0083 DATE: Monday May 10, 2021 __-____Thomas Ates __Y_____Brooke Bailey __Y_____Jessica Cohen __Y_____Melissa Hawthorne __Y_____Don Leighton-Burwell __Y_____Rahm McDaniel __Y_____Darryl Pruett __-_____Agustina Rodriguez __Y_____Michael Von Ohlen __Y_____Nicholl Wade __-_____Vacant __-_____Kelly Blume (Alternate) __-_____Carrie Waller (Alternate) __-_____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Daniel Salazar OWNER: Enez Salinas ADDRESS: 2810 GONZALES ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-774 (Two-Family Residential Use) (C) (2) (a) for a Two- Family Residential use location at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to erect a Secondary Dwelling Unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Govalle Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC the second Dwelling Unit must be contained in a structure other than the principal structure and must be located at least 10 feet to the rear or side of the principal structure BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING JAN 11, 2021 Board Member Jessica Cohen motions to postpone to February 8, 2021 due to technical difficulties, Board member Michael Von Ohlen seconds on a 9-0 vote; POSTPONED TO February 8, 2021 DUE TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES. February 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Brooke Bailey motions to postpone to March 8, 2021; Board Member Darryl Pruett seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021. March 8, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Postpone to April 12, 2021 Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO APRIL 12, 2021. (RENOTIFICATION NEEDED) D-1/1 VARIANCE REQUESTED: RENOTICE APRIL 12, 2021 The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 10 feet (required) to 4 feet 6 inches (requested) in order to erect a Secondary Dwelling Unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single- Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Govalle Neighborhood Plan) BOARD’S DECISION: April 12, 2021 cancelled due to technical problems with notification database; May 10, 2021 POSTPONED TO JUNE 14, 2021 DUE TO LACK OF BOARD MEMBERS/VOTES FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The …
