From: To: Subject: Date: Candace Volz Contreras, Kalan 2514 Wooldridge Dr. Wednesday, August 27, 2025 1:26:44 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Hello Kalan - We recently noticed an Historic landmark Commission sign at 2514 Wooldridge, as well as a demolition sign. Looking online, I found the "processes and notes" form on the Permits website (attached). What does "rejected" mean under "Historic Preservation? This owner, Hank Farrell, is with a property development/ management company and owns two adjacent properties on Wooldridge and, behind 2514, 2515 McCallum. In addition to the loss of 2514 Wooldridge as a contributing property in our NRD, it appears that Farrell will be tearing down 2514 to 1) create an "estate-let" or playground behind or next to one of his other contiguous properties, or 2) develop two or three of the lots into multi-family housing? Either outcome, plus the loss of the contributing property, is damaging to the historic appearance of our neighborhood. It does appear that the history of 2514, plus its largely intact facade, merits "H" zoning. But I disagree with the HLC staff's backup recommendations for "relocation or deconstruction and salvage". Both mean it leaves our neighborhood- the Wooldridge streetscape plus residents are the losers. Documenting the house is also a loss- what does a file cabinet or digital file full of "documentation" do for Austin's future?? Thank you for considering Pemberton Heights and Austin's future appearance as you make this decision. Incidentally, we've lost two contributing houses on Preston Ave. in the past 6 months, one torn down and one remuddled. 1412 Preston, the remuddled house, is no longer a contributing house in our NRD. It's appearance has been drastically changed. I know your office is understaffed, but in the meantime, Austin's architectural history is going down the drain. Candace Volz
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS SEPTEMBER 3, 2025 PR-2025-095243; PR-2025-095042; GF-2025-095661 TRAVIS HEIGHTS- FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1709 DRAKE AVENUE 8.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1925 residence and construct a house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish a single-story detached house, which is a contributing resource to the National Register historic district. 2) Construct a two-story single-family house in generally the same location. ARCHITECTURE The Craftsman bungalow located at 1709 Drake Avenue is a single-story house with a corner inset porch and front gabled roof. The street facing façade features two pairs of hung windows which appear to be original. There is a small roof covering the front of the porch, inset among the larger gables. This roof is supported by decorative brackets and some rafter tails are visible from the street. The house’s foundation is pier and beam, and it is overall in good condition. RESEARCH Upon construction at the end of the 1920s, the property went through a series of owners until at least the 1950s. Many of these residents were local craftspeople and service industry workers, and for a time the owners and operators of a local café lived at the address. Despite many of the owners only living at the address for a short time, several later lived in other parts of Travis Heights or South Austin before and after their stay at 1709 Drake Avenue. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location New construction is proposed in generally the same location as the existing building. 2. Orientation The two-story residence faces the street, similar to the existing building. 3. Scale, massing, and height A two-story residence replaces a one-story building as proposed. Per Standard 3.1, the height of new construction should respond to nearby contributing structures. There are some contributing structures that have two stories, but these are often later additions or set back from the front. However, the side gable construction at the second floor proposed in this application does minimize its overall visual height. 4. Proportions The proposed new construction generally keeps with the proportions of contributing properties on the block and in the district. Mentioned above, the second story is …
GENERAL TREE NOTES IMPACTS NO IMPACTS TO 1/2 CRITICAL ROOT ZONES (CRZ) (>4 INCHES) OR CANOPIES (>25%) OF PROTECTED TREES ALLOWED. THIS INCLUDES NEW UTILITIES AND NEW FENCE POSTS. UTILITY TRENCHING MUST AVOID THE 1/2 CRZ. IF THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE, THESE UTILITIES MUST BE AIR-EXCAVATED FOR THE TOP 30 INCHES BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST TO AVOID CUTTING ANY ROOTS 1.5INCH+ DIAMETER. CONTRACTOR REQUIRED TO PROVIDE RECEIPTS AND PHOTOS AT THE FINAL TREE INSPECTION. ALL DEMOLITION IN THE 1/4 & 1/2 CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF PROTECTED TREES MUST BE DONE WITH HAND TOOLS. PRUNING ANY PRUNING MUST HAPPEN ONLY ONCE DURING PROJECT, SHOULD TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION DAMAGE AND MUST BE PERFORMED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST. SAVE RECEIPTS FOR THE FINAL TREE INSPECTOR. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ) FENCING (5 FOOT + TALL CHAIN LINK) PER AUSTIN’S ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA MANUAL SECTION 3.5.2 IS REQUIRED FOR DURATION OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL PROTECTED TREES THAT HAVE CRZS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (LOC). THE LOC INCLUDES FOOT OR EQUIPMENT ACCESS PATHWAYS AS WELL AS MATERIAL OR SPOILS PLACEMENT AREAS. MULCHING WHEN TREE FENCING CANNOT INCORPORATE THE ENTIRE AVAILABLE FULL CRZ, AN 8 INCH LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITHIN THE ENTIRE AVAILABLE ROOT ZONE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PROTECTED TREES WHICH HAVE ANY DISTURBANCE (INCLUDING ACCESS PATHWAYS) INDICATED WITHIN THEIR CRZ. IF HEAVY EQUIPMENT WILL BE ROLLING OVER THE MULCHED ROOT ZONE, FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN SOIL AND MULCH IS REQUIRED. ON TOP OF THE MULCH, JOB SITE CAN LAY BREATHABLE MATS OR PLYWOOD SHEETS TO CREATE A WORK SURFACE THAT CAN BE EASILY ROLLED OVER. WHEN NATURAL GROUND COVER IS NOT PRESENT TO MAINTAIN SOIL MOISTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION, A 3 INCH LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH INSIDE CRZ FENCINGIS REQUIRED. DO NOT PILE MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST THE TREE TRUNKS. PLANKING WHEN TREE FENCING CANNOT INCORPORATE THE ENTIRE AVAILABLE ½ CRZ, STRAPPING 2X4 OR THICKER LUMBER (6 FOOT TALL MIN) SECURELY AROUND TREE TRUNK AND ROOT FLARE. ACCESS ALL ACCESS TO THE BUILD SHALL BE AREA SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED SITE PLAN. ALL MATERIAL STAGING, SPOILS, CONCRETE WASHOUT, DUMPSTER AND PORTABLE TOILET LOCATIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITH THE "STAGING AREA" SHOWN THE PLOT PLAN. PROPERTY LINE BLDG SETBACK [COA] PROPERTY LINE BLDG SETBACK [COA] EXISTING SHED POOL (18X10) EXISTING SHED (N19°00'E 49') 5'-0" PERMIT SET 7-29-2025 STUART SAMPLEY A R C H I T E C T P 512-771-8856 STUARTSAMPLEYARCHITECT.COM MEMBER …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS SEPTEMBER 3, 2025 PR-2025-086196; GF-2025-094899 902 WEST JOHANNA STREET 9.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1935 house. ARCHITECTURE The Craftsman-inspired bungalow located at 902 West Johanna Street is currently a side-by-side duplex with a shared front porch. This porch stretches across the middle half of the front elevation and is covered by a front-facing gable roof, which is inset within a gable covering the main house. Decorative brackets are present at both gables, along with latticework attic vents. The walls are clad in narrow teardrop siding, and the house is elevated on piers. A 1948 addition is present at the rear of the property. RESEARCH It isn’t known whether the house was originally constructed as a duplex, or if it was converted to such an orientation shortly after being built. From its construction around 1935 until the mid-1950s, the house was owned by Cecil & Daisy Naven, who had moved to Austin from Wichita Falls around the start of the Great Depression. Cecil Naven worked for several years at Southwestern Bell before being listed in city directories as a mechanic and repairman. During this time, they periodically had renters living at the address, presumably in the other half of the house. A work permit for a rear addition was filed with the city in 1948. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2015 Bouldin Creek historic resource survey lists the property as a medium priority. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Craftsman bungalow architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then material …
Front (North) Facade Side (East) Facade Side (West) Facade Rear (South) Facade architecture City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Wednesday, September 3, 2025 - 6:00 P.M. City Hall — Council Chambers 301 W. 2 nd street Austin, TX 78701 Review Case No. GF 2025-094899 902 W Johanna st, Austin, TX 78704 To whom it may concern, We, on behalf of our client Frances Nahas (FEN Holdings LLC), after careful review and thought propose to demolish the existing home at 902 W Johanna St, Austin, TX 78704 in preparation for a future new construction home. Our client is adamantly opposed to the imposition of historic zoning on her property. Please consider this a valid petition and advise me if any further action is required to perfect this right. Regards, Point B Design Group Bob Allsop, Senior Associate Rachel Smith, Associate Principal cc: Bob Allsop, Rachel Smith, Frances Nahas t Point B Design Group | 1009 W 6th St Austin TX 78703 | 512-568-9803
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION BRIEFING: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NOMINATIONS SEPTEMBER 3, 2025 MONTOPOLIS NEGRO SCHOOL 500 MONTOPOLIS DRIVE PROPOSAL A valid nomination to the National Register of Historic Places has been submitted to the Texas Historical Commission for the Montopolis Negro School property at 500 Montopolis Drive. Austin’s Historic Landmark Commission is required by the provisions of the State of Texas Certified Local Government program to comment on the nomination and to notify the THC and CLG program coordinators of its position. The nomination will be heard by the Texas Historical Commission’s State Board of Review on September 19, 2025. Copies of the draft nomination and meeting information are available at thc.gov/sbrmeeting and (see backup). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the nomination to the State Board of Review.
REGULAR CALLED MEETING OF THE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN Wednesday, September 3, 2025, 12:00 PM Austin City Hall, Boards and Commissions Room, #1101 301 West 2nd Street Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Commission for Women may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely or in person, call or email Christi Vitela, 512-974-2792, christi.vitela@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Becky Bullard, Chair Jocelyn Tau, Vice Chair Alexandria Anderson Vanessa Bissereth Angela Harris Diana Melendez Katrina Scheihing Rabia Shaik Fernanda Veloz Salas Shaimaa Zayan AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women regular meeting on August 6, 2025. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation regarding Divine Mama Strength by Maxine Eiland. 3. Discussion regarding the draft Joint Inclusion Committee’s Recommendation to Council regarding the Office of Community Liaison. WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from the Recognition Working Group regarding meetings held and discussions about changing the event to a biannual event. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 5. Approve changes to the scope of work and membership of the Recognition Working Group. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Christi Vitela at the Office of the City Clerk Department at 512-974-2792, or email christi.vitela@austintexas.gov, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Commission for Women, please contact Christi Vitela at the Office of the City Clerk Department at 512-974-2792, or email christi.vitela@austintexas.gov.
COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, August 6, 2025 Commission for Women Regular Meeting Minutes Wednesday, August 6, 2025 The Commission for Women convened in a regular meeting on Wednesday, August 6th, 2025, at City Hall, 301 W 2nd Street, Austin, TX. Chair Bullard called the Commission for Women regular meeting to order at 12:07 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Becky Bullard, Chair Rabia Shaik Shaimaa Zayan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Alexandria Anderson Diana Melendez Fernanda Veloz-Salas PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women regular meeting on July 9, 2025. The minutes from the meeting on July 9, 2025, were approved on Commissioner Veloz Salas’ motion, Commissioner Melendez’s second, on a 6-0 vote. Vice Chair Tau, Commissioners Bissereth, Harris, and Scheihing were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Update from the Joint Inclusion Committee (JIC) representative regarding the JIC meetings held in June and July 2025. Discussed. 3. Discussion of the Get to Know Your Commission events. Discussed. 1 COMMISSION FOR WOMEN MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, August 6, 2025 WORKING GROUP UPDATES 4. Update from the Quality of Life Working Group on the progress towards the completion of the Quality of Life Study. Commissioner Melendez provided an update. 5. Update from the Recognition Working Group regarding progress toward nominations, evaluation, and the 2025 event. Commissioner Melendez provided an update. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 6. Approve updates to the membership of the Collective Sex Crimes Response Model Working Group. The motion to approve the addition of Commissioners Shaik and Zayan to the Collective Sex Crimes Response Model Working Group was approved on Chair Bullard’s motion, Commissioner Melendez’s second on a 6-0 vote. Vice Chair Tau, Commissioners Bissereth, Harris, and Scheihing were absent. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Divine Mama Strength Approve the change in scope of work of the Recognition Working Group to have an event biannually instead of annually Discussion of a draft Recommendation to Council regarding the Office of Community Liaison Program Discussion of Welcoming Week (September) Presentation by the Office of Equity and Inclusion (October) Chair Bullard adjourned the meeting at 12:34 p.m. without objection. 2
Strong Mamas Create Stronger Communities Reimagining Postpartum & Women’s Wellness in Austin Presented by: Maxine Eiland Owner, Divine Mama Strength The Postpartum Gap 44% of women who had a baby say providers did not help them understand what is & isn’t normal in terms of symptoms Origin, 2024 Research Study We guide people to birth—but once the baby arrives, support stops. Their bodies have shifted, hormones spiraling, identity transforming— yet we expect them to ‘bounce back’ like nothing changed. Neglected Postpartum Care ● 96% of women with symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction have not been diagnosed** ● 85% of new mothers experience postpartum incontinence, but only 15% receive treatment* ● 67% of those who had a baby within five years have bladder leaks** ● 86% of those who had a baby say they didn’t receive any guidance on healing their pelvic floor after childbirth** ● 71% of women who gave birth within the past 5 years report receiving no guidance on exercising safely before or after childbirth** ● 83% of women who gave birth within the past 5 years report receiving no guidance on healing their abdominals after pregnancy & childbirth** *Urology Times **Origin, 2024 Research Study The Real-World Impact of Neglected Postpartum Care ● 24% of women exit the workforce during their first year of motherhood* ● Highest-achieving, highest-earning women are often the most likely to leave their jobs after maternity leave** ● Women who have given birth in the past 5 years report dissatisfaction with medical care related to returning to work*** ● 1 in 5 women experience a mental health issue during the perinatal period**** ● 1 in 6 Women (17%) who had a baby within 5 years say interactions with the healthcare system related to their most recent birth made them less likely to have another child*** *PubMed Central **Parentaly, Time ***Origin, 2024 Research Study ****Postpartum Support International Top Barriers to Postpartum Care *Origin, 2024 Research Study Divine Mama Strength Mission & Values Our mission at Divine Mama Strength is to empower women through every stage of life. From fertility to pregnancy, postpartum, & menopause, we provide personalized fitness, breathwork, & wellness programs that honor each woman’s unique journey. Guided by our core values of strength, confidence, & community, we ensure every woman feels supported, capable, & at home in her body. Who We Partner With Creating a Community of Care At Divine Mama Strength, we …
Historic Photo, 1940 Malcolm H. and Margaret Reed House 1712 Rio Grande photo courtesy Austin History Center East (Primary) Elevation 1712 Rio Grande Delta Tau Delta members gather on the front lawn for a photo, ca. 1930s 1712 Rio Grande photo courtesy of Delta Tau Delta Members enjoy the front porch ca. 1936. 1712 Rio Grande photos courtesy of Delta Tau Delta Fraternity brothers perch and plan on the front porch ca. 1940. 1712 Rio Grande photos courtesy of Delta Tau Delta South Elevation Oblique view of southeast corner 1712 Rio Grande South Elevation, ca. 1937 1712 Rio Grande photo courtesy of Delta Tau Delta South Elevation, ca. 1937 1712 Rio Grande photo courtesy of Delta Tau Delta Original Staircase no longer extant 1712 Rio Grande photos courtesy of Delta Tau Delta Delta Tau Delta members pose for group photo inside the house, ca. 1930s 1712 Rio Grande photos courtesy of Delta Tau Delta Hillel Foundation makes their home at 1712 Rio Grande, 1930. 1712 Rio Grande Fire damaged home’s interior twice in 1925 and 1932. Malcolm H. and Margaret Reed House 1712 Rio Grande Dolph Briscoe at Mount Bonnell Recognition of the home’s significance in a 1973 newspaper article. Dolph Briscoe, Jr., governor of Texas, lived in the house as a UT student. 1712 Rio Grande Delta Tau Delta members continue to have strong ties to UT traditions. 1712 Rio Grande photos courtesy of Delta Tau Delta Malcolm H. Reed was a notable figure in Austin’s early history. 1712 Rio Grande
From: To: Subject: Date: Candace Volz Contreras, Kalan 2514 Wooldridge Dr. Wednesday, August 27, 2025 1:26:44 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Hello Kalan - We recently noticed an Historic landmark Commission sign at 2514 Wooldridge, as well as a demolition sign. Looking online, I found the "processes and notes" form on the Permits website (attached). What does "rejected" mean under "Historic Preservation? This owner, Hank Farrell, is with a property development/ management company and owns two adjacent properties on Wooldridge and, behind 2514, 2515 McCallum. In addition to the loss of 2514 Wooldridge as a contributing property in our NRD, it appears that Farrell will be tearing down 2514 to 1) create an "estate-let" or playground behind or next to one of his other contiguous properties, or 2) develop two or three of the lots into multi-family housing? Either outcome, plus the loss of the contributing property, is damaging to the historic appearance of our neighborhood. It does appear that the history of 2514, plus its largely intact facade, merits "H" zoning. But I disagree with the HLC staff's backup recommendations for "relocation or deconstruction and salvage". Both mean it leaves our neighborhood- the Wooldridge streetscape plus residents are the losers. Documenting the house is also a loss- what does a file cabinet or digital file full of "documentation" do for Austin's future?? Thank you for considering Pemberton Heights and Austin's future appearance as you make this decision. Incidentally, we've lost two contributing houses on Preston Ave. in the past 6 months, one torn down and one remuddled. 1412 Preston, the remuddled house, is no longer a contributing house in our NRD. It's appearance has been drastically changed. I know your office is understaffed, but in the meantime, Austin's architectural history is going down the drain. Candace Volz
September 3, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission Members City of Austin At a time when social and economic conditions are rapidly changing the landscape of East Austin, there comes an opportunity to preserve something historic and meaningful. The Calhoun House under consideration today is one such opportunity. The one-story home is located at 2401 Givens Avenue in East Austin, within the Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Historic District, east of the Texas Capitol. The Calhoun House was one of the first to be built in this subdivision and it is the anchor of a key intersection. This house has been owned and inhabited by the Calhoun family since its construction for Theodore Calvin (T.C.) and Thelma Calhoun in 1959. The RWHC Historic District is one of the most intact concentrations of post-World War II housing for African Americans in Austin. As an early neighborhood developed by Black professionals for Black professionals, its development pattern is strongly tied to its cultural significance as a professional, middle-class, suburban neighborhood. The Calhoun House embodies the architecture trend and style known as “California ranch.” The ranch form, low slung, traces its root to a West Coast style that goes back nearly 100 years ago, to the 1930s. The home is in excellent condition and retains its original style and serves as a community gathering place in East Austin. Historic Association T.C. and Thelma Calhoun left behind more than their homestead -- they left behind a legacy. They were both committed educators and prominent civic leaders in Austin during the mid-twentieth century, when racial policies hindered the success and prosperity of Black Americans. The Calhouns played pivotal roles in the success and cohesiveness of the RWHC neighborhood, but left their mark on the entire community. T.C. was the second principal of Kealing Junior High, the first junior high in Austin to serve African American students. He was principal there for more than 30 years and retired when desegregation policies closed it in 1971. T.C. was also a deacon and trustee of Ebenezer 3rd Baptist Church, a founder and treasurer of the Austin-Travis County Teachers’ Credit Union, President of the Texas State Teachers’ Association, a president of the Austin Negro Chamber of Commerce and a member of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity. Thelma Calhoun lived to be 103 years old. She was a graduate of the original L.C. Anderson High School, a member of the Delta Sigma Theta Sorority and as …
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, August 20, 2025 The Environmental Commission convened in a Regular meeting on Wednesday, August 20, 2025, at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Bristol called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Jennifer Bristol, Hanna Cofer, Justin Fleury, Ashika Ganguly, Mariana Krueger, Martin Luecke, Haris Qureshi, David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Richard Brimer, Annie Fierro Commissioners Absent: Isabella Changsut PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on August 6th, 2025 The minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on August 6th, 2025 were approved as amended on Commissioner Qureshi’s motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s second on a 9-0 vote. Commissioner Ganguly was off the dais. Commissioner Changsut was absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation on Watershed Protection Department Flood Response – John Beachy, Division Manager, Kevin Shunk, Floodplain Administrator, Watershed Protection Department Speakers: Kevin Shunk, WPD John Beachy, WPD Francis Acuña, public comment 1 Item conducted as posted. No action taken. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS None ADJOURNMENT Chair Bristol adjourned the meeting at 8:12 pm without objection. 2
The Reservoir Update – FY 2024 and 2025 B r e n t B e l l i n g e r, P h . D . C o n s e r v a t i o n P r o g r a m S u p e r v i s o r Wa t e r s h e d P r o t e c t i o n D e p a r t m e n t S e p t e m b e r, 2 0 2 5 C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T Overview • A u s t i n L a ke s I n d e x • Goal – understand conditions and drivers impacting our waterways • Policy Relation – make management recommendations to protect and/or improve ecological conditions • A q u a t i c v e g e t a t i o n ( h o t t o p i c ) • Management challenges • S h o re zo n e h a b i t a t • Efficacy of code-and-criteria mitigation rules • M i c ro p l a s t i c s • Recent collaborative effort with University of Texas C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 2 Austin Lakes Index Score Scores remain fair-to-good • • Summarize: water and sediment chemistry, biological communities, habitat Influenced by: land-use, pollutant inputs, climate, flow C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T Lake Austin • Aq uatic vegetation • Native and non-native plants • Grass carp populations • 358 grass carp stocked in July • Boater and homeowner per spective • Want more plant management • Fishermen per spective • Want less plant management …
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Megan Meisenbach Contreras, Kalan; Historic Preservation Office; Heimsath, Ben - BC C14H-2025-0086 1712 Rio Grande Street Item 3 on Wednesday"s Agenda Tuesday, September 2, 2025 11:10:15 AM Texas Humanities 1410 Rio Grande.png Some people who received this message don't often get email from this is important . Learn why External Email - Exercise Caution Greetings Chairman Heimsath and Historic Landmark Commissioners, Officers of the Judges Hill Neighborhood Association support the nomination of 1712 Rio Grande Street for Historic Landmark Status. We welcome this addition to the Judges Hill Neighborhood that has 25 Landmarks. Landmark designations include: Two properties individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places Nine properties designated as Recorded Texas Historic Landmarks 25 City of Austin Historic Landmarks (these include the properties with National and State designations) The 1712 Rio Grande Street, adjacent to Judges Hill seems related to the Texas Humanities Building, at 1410 Rio Grande St. Thank you, Megan Meisenbach Austin Landmark Historic Matsen House Texas Landmark Judges Hill Neighborhood CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
