Residential New Construction and Addition Permit Application DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment Download application before entering information. Property Information Project Address: Legal Description: Zoning District: Neighborhood Plan Area (if applicable): Required Reviews Is project participating in S.M.A.R.T. Housing? (If yes, attach signed certification letter from NHCD, and signed conditional approval letter from Austin Energy Green Building) Y N Tax Parcel ID: Lot Area (sq ft): Historic District (if applicable): N Does project have a Green Building requirement? (If yes, attach signed conditional approval letter from Austin Energy Green Building) Y Is this site within an Airport Overlay Zone? (If yes, approval through Aviation is required) Y N Does this site have a septic system? (If yes, submit a copy of approved septic permit. OSSF review required) Y N Does the structure exceed 3,600 square feet total under roof? Is this property within 200 feet of a hazardous pipeline? Is this structure within the WUI? (Wildland Urban Interface) Will a NFPA 13D automatic sprinkler system be installed? Is this site located within an Erosion Hazard Zone? Y N (If yes, EHZ review is required) (If yes, Fire review is required) (If yes, Fire review is required) (If yes, Fire review is required) (If yes, Fire review is required) Y Y Y Y N N N N N Y Is this property within 100 feet of the 100-year floodplain? Y (Proximity to floodplain may require additional review time.) Are there trees 19” or greater in diameter on/adjacent to the property? If yes, how many? ( Provide plans with a tree survey, tree review required.) N Was there a pre-development consultation for the Tree Review? Y N Proposed impacts to trees: (Check all that apply) Root zone Canopy Removal None/Uncertain Is this site in the Capital View Corridor? (If yes, a preliminary review through land use is needed to determine if full view corridor review is required.) Does this site currently have: water availability? wastewater availability? Y Y Y N Is this site within the Residential Design and Compatibility Standards Ordinance Boundary Area? (LDC 25-2 Subchapter F) N Y N N (If no, contact Austin Water Utility to apply for water/wastewater taps and/or service extension request.) Does this site have or will it have an auxiliary water source? (Auxiliary water supplies are wells, rainwater harvesting, river water, lake water, reclaimed water, etc.) N …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 PR-2023-162417; GF-2024-005554 1403 ELTON LANE 22 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1950 duplex. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story cross-gabled Ranch dwelling with stone veneer, a two-story rear addition, and a detached garage. The house at 1403 Elton Lane was built in 1950 by Kelly DeBusk. It is unclear whether Kelly DeBusk, Sr. or Kelly DeBusk, Jr. is listed on the initial permit for the home, as both father and son were involved in the construction industry: DeBusk, Sr. as the manager of the Lamar Lumber Company, and DeBusk, Jr. as an architectural engineer and prominent Austin homebuilder. Kelly DeBusk, Sr. and his wife, Katie DeBusk, lived in the home until DeBusk, Sr.’s death in 1952. Katie DeBusk continued to live in the home until at least the 1960s, renting out half of the duplex to students, servicemen, and others. DeBusk was the only child of an early pioneering family in Bell County, and was active in charitable organizations and University of Texas service clubs until her death in 1971. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. Modern outbuildings and a modern two-story addition have been added to the rear of the property, though they are set far back from the street. Windows have been replaced. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property is associated with the DeBusk family. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property was not evaluated for its ability to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 22 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 22 – 3 22 – 4 Demolition permit application, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 PR-2023-163776; GF-2024-005557 508 EL PASO STREET 23 – 1 Demolish a house built prior to 1949. ARCHITECTURE PROPOSAL RESEARCH One-story rectangular-plan house with corrugated metal roof, 1:1 wood windows, horizontal wood siding, and a steeply pitched gablet supported by decorative triangular brackets above the entry stoop. The house at 508 El Paso Street was built before 1949; the earliest evidence of its existence is a tap permit from 1948, though it appears to have been built in a much earlier style. Its first residents to appear in City directories were Hazel and Forrest Bowers, who sold the house to George and LaVerne Pickle. George Pickle worked as a mechanic at the Lopez Garage. The Pickles did not stay in the house long; by 1952, Christoval and Janie Sosa had purchased the home for their family. Christoval worked as an installer at Dill-Challstrom’s, who sold Venetian blinds and carports, and Janie worked as an office secretary for the R. C. Foster Company. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed with Craftsman influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not appear to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 23 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos Demolition permit application, 2023 Zillow.com, https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/508-El-Paso-St-Austin-TX-78704/29476379_zpid/?mmlb=g,0 23 – 3 Occupancy History City Directory Research, January 2024 1959 1955 1952 1949 1941 Address not listed Historical Information Christoval and Jamie Sosa, owners – installer at Dill’s-Challstrom and office secretary at R.C. Foster Co. Christoval and …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 PR-2024-000257; GF-2024-005558 711 WEST MONROE STREET 24 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1906 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 711 West Monroe Street is a one-story L-plan house with a double hipped roof and a partial-width porch supported by boxed columns. It has 2:2 wood and aluminum windows and horizontal siding. The house at 711 West Monroe, addressed alternatively as 705 West Monroe, appears to have been built between 1904 and 1906. Its first occupants were the Wimberly family, who remained in the home until around 1934. Jim Wimberly worked as a carpenter, a saloon operator, and a grocer. He and his wife, Matilda, also owned the Wimberly Filling Station on South First Street for a short time. After building a new house on South First in 1934, the Wimberlys sold the house to Charles Douglas and Mary Benson. Charley Benson worked as a carpenter, a machinist, and superintendent at Wager Memorial Presbyterian Church, where he also served as a deacon. Mary Benson worked as a bookbinder at the Steck Company. They had four children and lived in the home until at least 1959. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2016 Bouldin Creek survey lists the property as a medium priority and contributing to a potential historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. The building appears to have been added on to and clad with aluminum siding outside the period of significance, though the porch modifications date to the historic period and have gained significance in their own right. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed with National Folk and Classical-style influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not appear to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to …
CASE NUMBER: C14H-2023-0136 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATES: November 1, 2023; December 13, 2023 (postponed); January 10, 2024 (postponed); February 7, 2024 PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-supported) HISTORIC NAME: Green & White Grocery WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1201 East 7th Street/607 Waller Street ZONING CHANGE: TOD-NP to TOD-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from transit-oriented development- neighborhood plan (TOD-NP) to transit-oriented development-neighborhood plan-historic landmark (TOD-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture, community value, and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: November 1, 2023—initiate historic zoning (10-0). December 13, 2023—postpone to January 10, 2024 (9-0). January 10, 2024—postpone to February 7, 2024 (10-0). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Capital Metro, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, El Concilio Mexican- American Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association, Guadalupe Association for an Improved Neighborhood, Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods, Plaza Saltillo TOD Staff Liaison, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the store building as eligible for designation as a local landmark and individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. It does not recommend the house for designation. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The Green & White grocery is an intact example of a neighborhood grocery store, a rapidly disappearing property type in Austin. Its vernacular construction, eye-catching sign, and distinctive clipped gable are iconic symbols of East Austin commerce. As is typical for small businesses …
Permitting and Development Center | 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, TX 78752 | (512) 978-4000 Property Profile Report General Information Location: Parcel ID: Grid: 1201 E 7TH ST 0205070101 MJ22 Planning & Zoning *Right click hyperlinks to open in a new window. Future Land Use (FLUM): Specific Regulating District Regulating Plan: Plaza Saltillo TOD Zoning: TOD-NP Zoning Cases: C14-01-0148 C14-01-0148.004 C14-2008-0029 NPA-2007-0009.01 NPA-2008-0009.01 011213-42 19990225-070b 20081211-082 20081211-084 Zoning Ordinances: Zoning Overlays: Neighborhood Plan: Infill Options: Neighborhood Restricted Parking Areas: -- Mobile Food Vendors: Historic Landmark: -- -- Urban Roadways: Yes No No No No No No Environmental Fully Developed Floodplain: FEMA Floodplain: Austin Watershed Regulation Areas: URBAN Watershed Boundaries: Waller Creek Creek Buffers: Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone: Edwards Aquifer Recharge Verification Zone: Erosion Hazard Zone Review Buffer: Political Boundaries Jurisdiction: AUSTIN FULL PURPOSE Council District: 3 County: TRAVIS School District: Austin ISD Community Registry: ADU Approximate Area Reduced Parking Residential Design Standards: LDC/25-2-Subchapter F Transit Oriented Development: PLAZA SALTILLO Selected Sign Ordinances CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN: SUB-DISTRICT 1 Mixed Use Building Infill Option, Urban Home Infill Option, Secondary Apartment Infill Option, Small Lot Amnesty Infill Option Zoning Guide The Guide to Zoning provides a quick explanation of the above Zoning codes, however, the Land Development Information Services provides general zoning assistance and can advise you on the type of development allowed on a property. Visit Zoning for the description of each Base Zoning District. For official verification of the zoning of a property, please order a Zoning Verification Letter. General information on the Neighborhood Planning Areas is available from Neighborhood Planning. Imagery Map Zoning Map Vicinity Map Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Capital Metro, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, El Concilio Mexican-American Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association , Guadalupe Association for an Improved Neighborhood, Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods , Plaza Saltillo TOD Staff Liaison, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town The Information on this report has been produced by the City of Austin as a working document and is not warranted for any other use. No warranty is made by the City regarding its accuracy or completeness. Date created: 11/2/2023 Amber Allen Historic Preservation Office City of Austin October 17, 2023 RE: Green and White Grocery (1201 …
Historical Zoning Application: Green and White Grocery, 1201 E. 7th St. Applicant: John Lopez Cazares Date:1/31/24 Project Name: Green and White Grocery Project Street Address: 1201 E. 7th St. Existing Zoning: TOD-NP Area to be Rezoned: .1495 Acres Proposed Zoning: TOD-H-NP Qualifications for Landmark Designation: Architecture, Historical Association, & Community Value Owner information: John Lopez Cazares 1201 E. 7th Street Austin, Texas 78702 (512) 472-0675 Application Prepared by: Matthew Medina (Preservation Austin) & JuanRaymon Rubio (City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission) ___________________________________________________________________________ Qualifications for Landmark Designation 1201 E. 7th St. meets the qualifications for Local Historic Landmark designation based on the following criteria: Architecture, Historical associations, and Community Value. Architecture Green and White Grocery is a one-story wood frame building sited on the northwest corner of the block. The store is approximately 44’ by 74’, and has its main facade along E. 7th St. The store has had multiple additions since its initial construction in 1938. Sanborn maps, historic photos, and oral histories have helped determine the building’s growth over time, although some additions and modifications appear to have happened without documentation. The store was originally half the size and depth and likely received a rear addition in 1944 and a store enlargement in 1950.1 Subsequent additions to the end of the building after 1965 resulted in its current state. Today, the store is defined by its Craftsman style characteristics including decorative wood brackets and exposed rafter rails beneath the primary roof structure and the first-story awning, and a large clipped gable roof, also known as a jerkinhead roof. The building features composite siding at the exterior walls, asphalt composition shingles, and aluminum doors and windows. The main facade has a classic “Green & White Groc.” sign painted green with custom tube lighting letters. The west elevation has no windows, and the east elevation has a few hopper 1 Norverto, Lopez. “Building Permit.” 44660, Austin, Texas, 1950, Austin History Center. Historical Zoning Application: Green and White Grocery, 1201 E. 7th St. clerestory windows. A portion of the west elevation is defined by a rubble stone wall that extends along Waller St. towards the detached residence. The stone wall has entrance steps to the house and backyard. It appears in historic photos from the 1940s. The rear elevation has a protruding dormer at the southeast corner with a private store entrance. Changes to the building since the 1960s include removal of …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATIONS FOR CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS 2024 HERITAGE GRANT PROJECTS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2023-160038, HR-2023-160051 5-6 – 1 PROPERTY INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK/APPLICANT ADDITIONAL ARC RECOMMENDATIONS PROPOSALS Kreisle Building 412 Congress Avenue Paggi Carriage Shop 421 E. 6th Street Rehab elevator, replace roof deck to install waterproofing and awning to repair/protect trusses beneath, repair gutters, repaint and reseal painted exterior surfaces, and reconstruct fire exit walkway. Applicant: Caitlyn Schwab Remove and repair/replace deteriorated roof elements, weatherproofing and installing new TPO roof. Applicant: Caitlyn Schwab None None STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Certificates of Appropriateness for all Heritage Grant projects. LOCATION MAPS 5-6 – 2 5-6 – 3
7 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2024-004371 GIESE-STARK STORE 1211 SAN BERNARD STREET PROPOSAL Repair store building, replace doors and windows, and add porch at rear. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair/restore/replace existing awning structure at west and north elevations as needed, including columns, in-kind. 2) Repair and repaint siding throughout the store building. 3) Replace missing windows at the west elevation with pairs of double-hung clad wood windows, including wire 4) Reconfigure and replace non-historic doors and windows at east, south, and north elevations with more appropriate glass/antique wire. Maintain existing openings. styles. Patch with salvaged siding where needed. 5) Replace the existing entry door with painted wood double doors, maintaining door opening and transom at the west elevation. Replace non-historic doors at the north elevation with partially glazed wood doors, maintaining door openings and transoms. 6) Add a concrete porch at the rear. 7) Extend the missing parapet cap around the perimeter per c. 2000 photograph. 8) Replace siding with stucco at the upper-floor addition. Add an awning and skylights. ARCHITECTURE One-story frame store building with covered porch, transom windows and doors, and a ca. 2010 upper-floor addition. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes minimal historic fabric, replacing missing elements or non-historic features. 3. Roofs The proposed parapet replacement is based on photographic evidence. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed patching and repair are appropriate. 5. Windows, doors, and screens Window and door repair and reinstallation are largely appropriate, with opening changes taking place at non-historic portions of secondary façades. The proposed designs for windows are appropriate. 6. Porches The proposed awning repair appears appropriate, and the rear porch will be added to an already altered secondary façade. 11. Commercial storefronts The proposed project rehabilitates the existing store façade and replaces fenestration within original openings. Summary The project mostly meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Use photos to corroborate changes where needed. Ensure that the awning is minimally visible from street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 7 – 2
Proposed Work Location of Proposed Work Proposed Materials West elevation and west end of north elevation (San Bernard and E 13th Street) Painted wood 1 Repair/restore/replace existing awning structure as needed, including columns, per structural engineer to provide a safe, stable structure. Maintain appearance of current structure insofar as structurally feasible. 2 Repair and paint existing wood siding. 3 4 5 Infill existing window openings, pairs of period- appropriate double-hung windows, to include wire glass/antique wire glass; sizes to remain. Infill existing door opening with new period- appropriate panel doors. Transoms as well as opening size to remain. Infill two existing door openings with new period- appropriate panel doors, to include antique wire. Transoms as well as opening sizes to remain. All elevations of Giese-Stark store portion of structure Maintain existing wood siding. Any siding removed from new openings to patch abandoned openings. West elevation (San Bernard) Clad wood windows, wire-glass glazing. West elevation (San Bernard) Painted wood double doors. Maintain existing transom. North elevation (E 13th Street) Painted fixed wood doors, glazed upper panels. Maintain existing transoms. 6 Remove two individual circa-2011 double-hung windows with a ganged pair of period-appropriate double-hung windows. North elevation, east end (E 13th Street) Clad wood windows. Any siding removed from new openings to be used to patch c.2011 openings. 7 Add new covered concrete porch. East elevation (facing back yard) Concrete porch, steel columns, hipped metal roof with similar pitch as historic west awning. 8 Replace/reconfigure circa-2011 window and door rough opening with new glazed double doors, transom above, flanked with period-appropriate double-hung windows. East elevation (facing back yard) Painted wood panel doors, glazed upper panels. Clad wood windows. Any siding removed from new openings to be used to patch c.2011 openings. 9 Replace/relocate circa-2011 window with new period-appropriate double-hung window. South elevation (facing back yard) 10 New period-appropriate double-hung window. South elevation (facing cottage front yard) 11 Extend existing north parapet cap around entire parapet perimeter per c.2000 photo All four elevations of parapet wall Clad wood window. Any siding removed from new opening to be used to patch c.2011 opening. Clad wood window. Any siding removed from new opening to be used to patch c.2011 opening(s). Metal roofing, painted wood trim. 12 Stucco replacing existing wood siding of circa-2011 upper floor addition. Recessed existing c.2011 upper addition. 3-coat stucco system. 13 Add lightweight awning. Lightweight metal frame and roofing. 14 Two …
8 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 C14H- 1980-0011; HR-2023-148863; GF-2023-149149 HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE 1209 ROSEWOOD AVENUE PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install landscape elements, fencing, and pavement to a landmarked site also individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 1) Remodel ADA pathways and install hardscape at the north entry, north-to-south connection, east-to-west connection, and west-facing patio. Proposed materials include Austin Common brick or equivalent to match the existing house. 2) Install brick walls, retaining walls, and seat walls at new patios. 3) Install a built-in canopy at the southwest of the property. Materials include Austin Common brick or equivalent to match the existing house and kebony. 4) Install a vine screen fence at the property perimeter, retaining existing fencing as well. 5) Planting improvements throughout the site, including native planting areas and shade trees. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 6. Porches The proposed project appears to rebuild the existing front steps and remove railings reconstructed around 2017. Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping The proposed landscaping eliminates most of the grass lawn in favor of plantings. It appears to grade the site to allow additional pavement for seating. 2. Walls and fences The proposed low vine screen is an appropriate complement to the existing wire fencing. The low brick walls and fences are appropriate in scale and materials. 3. Mechanical equipment and site appurtenances The built-in canopy structure at the rear of the house is a simpler replacement for an existing temporary structure. 4. Accessibility Proposed brick pathways appear appropriate for the site and compatible with the building. Summary The proposed project meets most of the standards. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION Choose plantings, furniture, and screening that enhance transparency so that the house is visible. Approve the application. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback. LOCATION MAP 8 – 2
Legend Legend 1 9 4 0 a e r i a l 1 9 5 8 a e r i a l Legend Notes 0 1/4/2024 300 600 ft 0 1/4/2024 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 300 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1 9 6 5 a e r i a l 1 9 7 6 a e r i a l Notes 0 1/4/2024 300 600 ft 0 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for 300 the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1/4/2024 completeness. Legend Notes Notes CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024Property ProfileProperty ProfileProperty ProfileProperty Profile CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2024-005072 RISHER-ROACH BUILDING, PART A 509 EAST 6TH STREET 9 – 1 PROPOSAL Rehabilitate the building and replace the storefront. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair and repaint the existing brick façade. 2) Replace the storefront within the existing openings. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Single-story brick structure with two arched windows and simple brick cornice detailing. The building has been painted. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project does not remove historic fabric from the building and repairs damaged masonry. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs damaged masonry and paints only previously painted brick. 11. Commercial storefronts The proposed storefront replaces only non-original material and appears appropriate in design and configuration. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Explore paint removal options if possible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 9 – 2
