1'-43 4" O.H. 23 4" ℄ ℄ 3'-81 2" ℄ 3'-81 2" ℄ 23 4" 14'-111 4" 7'-03 4" 1'-43 4" O.H. " 9 - ' 1 . . H O ℄ " 4 3 2 " 2 1 3 - ' 5 1 " 2 1 8 - ' 3 ℄ " 2 1 8 - ' 3 ℄ " 2 1 8 - ' 3 ℄ " 2 1 8 - ' 3 " 4 3 2 ℄ SCREEN PORCH 001 7'-51 2" ℄ 1 SCREEN PORCH FLOOR PLAN 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " RADERE H IEM C C. S L C H I T , J R . E C T T SIG E R . J S T A T E 20007 F T O E S AX 2/13/2024 FOR PERMIT BEAMAN RESIDENCE LISA + JOE BEAMAN 4004 AVENUE H AUSTIN, TX 78751 ISSUE DATE: 2.13.24 SCREEN PORCH FLOOR PLAN M E R Z B A U DESIGN COLLECTIVE 4009 Banister Ln. 250, Austin TX 78704 T | 512 636 5900 E | jcschmeil@merzbau.com J.C. SCHMEIL, ARCHITECT AIA | TEXAS LICENSE NO. 20007 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 4" = 1'-0" A2.3
2 3 ' - 6 " C R Z 11'-9" 1 2 CRZ ' . 0 0 5 7 E " 7 1 0 1 ° 0 3 N ' OVERHEAD POWER LINES (E) UTILITY POLE 9'-91 4" " 6 - ' 6 (E) WOOD FENCE 23.5" PECAN 5'-101 2" 1 4 CRZ (N) 2 STORY STUDIO (E) WOOD FENCE (N) PATIO Q B B S 59°45'02" E 125.16' (N) WOOD FENCE 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK (N) SCREENED PORCH (N) CONC. DRIVEWAY K C A B T E S D R A Y T N O R F ' 5 2 25'-0" CRZ 25" POSTOAK Z R C 14 " 3 - ' 6 Z R C 1 2 2'-6" 1 " 4 3 9 - ' 1 1 ' . 0 0 5 7 W ' " 0 0 8 0 ° 0 3 S LOT 22-24 BLK 30 HYDE PARK ADDN (E) CONC. WALKWAY H E U N E V A ) . . W O R . ' 0 6 ( OVEN STACK REF FRZ BEV. WINE K C A B T E S D R A Y R A E R ' 0 1 OVERHEAD POWER FEEDER LINE 3 1'- 0 " C R Z D W (E) 1 STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 33'-5" 1 SITE PLAN 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " N RADERE H IEM C C. S L C H I T , J R . E C T T SIG E R . J S T A T E 20007 F T O E S AX 2/13/2024 FOR PERMIT 5' SIDE YARD SETBACK (E) WOOD FENCE 15'-6" 1 2 CRZ 31" PECAN 7'-9" 1 4 CRZ Z R C 1 4 " 3 5'- 21" PALM (E) WOOD FENCE Z C R 1 " 2 6 0 ' - 1 21'-0" CRZ N 59°45'02" W 125.21' " 0 1 - ' 4 1 3 2 ' - 0 " C R Z 1 6 '- 0 " 1 2 C R Z 32" PECAN BEAMAN RESIDENCE LISA + JOE BEAMAN 4004 AVENUE H AUSTIN, TX 78751 ISSUE DATE: 2.13.24 M E R Z B A U DESIGN COLLECTIVE 4009 Banister Ln. #250, Austin TX 78704 T | 512 636 5900 E | jcschmeil@merzbau.com J.C. SCHMEIL, ARCHITECT AIA | TEXAS LICENSE NO. 20007 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ROOF PLAN 1" = 10'-0" …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APRIL 3, 2024 HR-2024-029019; C14H-2003-0015 SHELBY HOUSE 1114 WEST 9TH STREET 8 – 1 PROPOSAL Replace roof and gutters. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE 1) Replace the existing composite shingle roof with standing-seam metal roofing in charcoal grey. 2) Replace the gutters. According to the landmark designation application, the building is a “Two-story irregular-plan pyramidal hipped-roof frame house with minimal Prairie Style influences. The house contains a two-story partial-width inset porch; the second story of the porch has been enclosed with windows. Fenestration on the main part of the house is 1:1 wood frame windows. The doorway features a 3-light transom and single-light sidelights. […] Although not a true Prairie-style house, the Shelby House contains the horizontal lines popularized by [Frank Lloyd] Wright. […] Built around 1910, the house was originally a one-story frame structure containing 5 rooms and appeared to be a typical middle-class house when it was first constructed. L.E. Shelby, a prominent local dry goods merchant, purchased the house in 1911, and made significant changes to it, including the construction of a second story, blasting through the limestone shelf below to create a basement, and adding a porte-cochere.”1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed roof replacement does not remove historic material or change the historic roofline. 3. Roofs 3.5 Owners of landmark properties must replace roofs with material that approximates the appearance of the historic or existing roof material. d. Standing seam metal roofs, despite their historic look, are generally not acceptable for historic landmarks unless the owner can document that the building historically had a standing seam roof. Metal roof systems that replicate the historic roof material and have a historic appearance are acceptable. The proposed project replaces a shingle roof with a standing-seam metal roof. The original building likely would have been roofed with wood shakes or other shingle-form roofing, as metal roofing was generally restricted to carriage houses, stables, or other outbuildings in this area during the house’s period of significance. Summary The project mostly does not meet the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Postpone the public hearing to May 1, 2024, and invite the applicant to …
(a w i l s o n ROOFING 2 1 7 - A S. C o m m o n s F o r d R o a d A u s t i n , T X 7 8 7 3 3 (512) 263-3157 w w w . w i l s o n r o o f i n g . c o m S t a n d a r d C o l o r s S h a s t a W h i t e P a r c h m e n t A l m o n d M e d i u m B r o n z e C o p p e r B r o w n Deep Red Colonia! K e : Patina G r e e n - . e r e s i e a l G r e e n H a r t f o r d Green C i t y s c a p e Z i n c G r e y M a t t e B l a c k P r e m i u m C o l o r s M e t a l l i c C o l o r s Premium colors require a nominal surcharge. Metallic colors are premium finishes which require a nominal surcharge. Natural White A w a r d Biue N a t u r a l M e t a l F i n i s h A c r y l i c - C o a t e d G a l v a l u m e * B ? I x V E S i s a c o a t e d p r o d u c t t h a t c o m b i n e s t h e c o r r o s i o n r e s i s t a n c e of G a i v a l u m e * steel s h e e t \ , j * ?s+, sheet w i t h a clear, o r g a n i c resin | , . appliedt o the top side a n d b o t t o m ?s side of Galvalume® …
9 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APRIL 3, 2024 HR-2024-030185; C14H- 2003-0007 VIOLET CROWN 1504 WEST LYNN STREET PROPOSAL Remove and replace incompatible non-historic additions, repaint, and construct a detached guesthouse. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a new circular drive. 1) Remove the street-facing carport and replace it with a new, painted steel carport on the southeast side of the house. 2) Repaint the house with historically appropriate colors as seen in early photos. 3) Reclad the addition between the garage and the original house with painted vertical wood siding. 4) Construct a guesthouse and covered patio at the rear of the property. The proposed structure is clad with vertical wood siding and has painted steel fenestration. 5) Reconfigure the existing pool and add a new deck. ARCHITECTURE The 2003 landmark designation nomination describes the building as “a textbook example of the Tudor Revival style, with its false half-timbering, steeply pitched gable containing the round-arched doorway, stone facade, prominent chimney, and multi-light windows.”1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project does not appear to significantly affect historic material. 3. Roofs Proposed alterations to the existing additions’ rooflines appear appropriate. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed new cladding appears appropriate in style and material and is sufficiently differentiated from historic material. 8. Attached garages and carports The proposed project removes an inappropriate and non-historic attached carport. Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed guest house is appropriately located at the rear of the property. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed new structure is very small in scale and does not appear visible from the street. 4. Proportions The proposed detached bedroom’s proportions are mostly compatible. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s design and style are appropriately simple. 6. Roofs Though the proposed building’s steep roofline is dramatic, it complements the original building’s more complex Tudor 1 Zoning Change Review Sheet: C14H-03-0007. Historic Preservation Office, 2003. 9 – 2 Revival roofline. 7. Exterior walls The proposed exterior walls are appropriate. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fenestration is compatible. 9. Porches The proposed covered porch is large in scale, but is not visible from …
SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 24" X 36". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 12" X 18". ADDITIONAL TREE PROTECTION NOTES: ALL DEMOLITION IN THE 1/4 AND 1/2 CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE DONE WITH HAND TOOLS // // // // // // // // // M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M EXST SERVICE DROP TO BE RELOCATED AND CONNECTED TO NEW BUILDING 2; DEMO POLE DEMO SCREENING FENCE 6 0 1 M M 1 0 5 DEMO CURB // EXST PORCH EXST WALL M 1 0 4 5' COA SETBACK 103 2 0 1 EXST DRIVE DEMO CARPORT & ALL ASSOCIATED CONCRETE & RESTORE NATURAL GRADE DEMO DRIVE & RESTORE NATURAL GRADE 101 9 9 DEMO COL DEMO OUT GRILL 1 0 6 DEMO WOOD STEPS DEMO PAV, TYP DEMO HARDSCAPE DEMO HARDSCAPE DEMO POOL 106 DEMO SHED K C A B T E S A O C ' 0 1 105 104 L L A W T S X E 3 0 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / T S N N Y L T S E W ) W O R ' 0 6 ( EXISTING TWO STORY WOOD FRAME RESIDENCE F.F.= 106.0' EXST WALK DEMO WALLS & RESTORE NATURAL GRADE 3 0 1 EXST PORCH 4 0 1 M M M M M M M M 102 M M M 1 0 1 M M M M M M 2 0 1 MM M M 101 102 DEMO WALLS DEMO FIRE-PIT DEMO FENCE & GATE DEMO WALLS DEMO AC PADS 5' COA SETBACK EXST WALL DEMO WALK K C A B T E S A O C ' 5 2 EXST DRIVE 99 8 9 DEMO WALL & RESTORE NATURAL GRADE DEMO EQUIPMENT 103 1 0 3 // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // 7 9 DEMO COL // LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT NO. 22 BLOCK N/A, ENFIELD "C", A SUBDIVISION IN …
