Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Good evening, Thomas Blank Monday, April 27, 2026 6:40 PM Historic Preservation Office HR-2026-037163 External Email - Exercise Caution I would like to register my support for this project in my neighborhood. The owners of 522 Sunny Lane should be able to improve their own property as they see fit. Regards, Tom Blank 1205 Bickler Rd CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits May 6, 2026 PR-2026-033910 507 Park Boulevard 15 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1924 house. Architecture This single-story residence is an intact example of craftsman bungalow architecture in the Hancock neighborhood. The house features a wide front porch with a large gable roof above. The front door is roughly in the center of the front elevation, with a single 1-over-1 window on each side. The original brackets appear to be in good condition, and a rectangular attic vent is present at the center of the gable. Narrow teardrop siding, likely original, is present on all sides. While there have been several minor additions added to the property since construction, they are all compatible to the property and can be identified as not original to the building. As buildings change over time, none of the alterations are significant enough to call the building’s integrity into question. The existing condition easily meets the architecture criteria for landmark designation. Research The first several decades of the house’s existence saw two long term owners live at the address. First, Ray and Mattie Traweek owned the property until around 1939, and raised at least one son there. Ray worked as a salesman for the entirety of their ownership, and Ray Jr. worked for a time as a clerk. After they moved, the property was bought by Albert and Sidney Becker, who lived at the address until at least the 1960s. Department Comments This application will time out on July 20, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2021 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek lists the property as a medium priority and a contributing resource to a potential Hancock West historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Craftsman bungalow architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits May 6, 2026 PR-2026-040403 1808 East Cesar Chavez Street 16 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1930 structure. Architecture The existing structure is a two story commercial structure with two storefront entries side-by-side on the main elevation. There is a small, metal clad awning above the ground floor entryways. Above, two sets of paired, wood- frame windows are present at the second floor, with a moderately pitched hipped roof with exposed rafter tails above. The roof material is metal standing seam, and all exterior walls are clad in thin teardrop siding. While several of the windows are currently boarded over or otherwise inaccessible, images from the past decade would indicate that the existing material is largely intact, if in need of repair. Research This property has a long history of commercial tenants who served the East Austin community. For several decades after construction, it was home to a beauty parlor, a barber shop, and a shoe repair shop. By the 1950s, one or more of these tenants had vacated the building, but there was always at least one occupied storefront at the property. Newspaper records feature advertisements for Smith’s Barber Shop, Guarantee Wave Shop, and Carlson’s Shoe Repair Shop. The latter of these was owned by Reverend E. A. Carlson, formerly a Swedish Baptist minister, for 31 years until his death in 1964. Department Comments Two permits were issued for the property in 1999, though there are no digitized records of the application material. However, summary descriptions are available in city records. One permit described work to remodel the building’s interior & exterior to create a duplex. The second permit from the same year is summarized as, “Add 1st floor stair tower, porch, and 2nd floor extension.” There are no records of this property being surveyed in the 1980 East Austin historic resource survey or the 1984 citywide comprehensive resource survey. At time of writing, no photos of the property can be found prior to the 1999 permits. This application will time out on July 20, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2016 East Austin historic resource survey lists the property as eligible as a City of Austin landmark, as well as contributing to a potential local or National Register historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) …
A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. LAND TITLE SURVEY 2 1 1 2 29" Pecan Tree 20.5" American Elm Tree Buildings & Covered Area to be Demolished LOC: Demolition Erosion Controls: Silt fence or mulch sock, as needed Boundary Boys, LLC
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits May 6, 2026 DA-2026-038798 403 Orchard Street 17 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1912 house, currently used as a business. Architecture This house is a single-story National Folk style building with an inset porch at one corner. The walls are clad in wood tongue and groove siding, and the windows appear to be original wood frames. There is a moderately pitched hipped roof clad in composite shingles. The foundation is pier and beam, with the house slightly elevated above grade. Newspaper records indicate that a permit was issued for two additional rear rooms in 1944, which was the only significant alteration to the building. Research In the first few decades after construction, the occupants of the property were employed in local industries that were situated near the adjacent railroad tracks, including the Austin Transit Company and an ice storage facility. The longest occupants were Leo Payne, who worked as an iceman, and Braulio and Maria Quintanilla, who worked as a cobbler and shoe salesman. They would remain at the address through at least the 1950s, and raised at least one son in the house. Department Comments This application will time out on July 20, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2025 Downtown Austin historic resource survey lists the property as a high priority and eligible for the National Register as an individual resource or contributing to a potential district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of the National Folk form and style that was once common to the area, with few remaining examples. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or …
[A] 1205 1/2 W. 5TH, LLC DOC. NO. 2015111217 O.P.R.T.C.T. [B] TRACT 2 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136745 O.P.R.T.C.T. [C] TRACT 5 1205 1/2 W. 5TH, LLC DOC. NO. 2020136742 O.P.R.T.C.T. [D] TRACT 4 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136743 O.P.R.T.C.T. [E] TRACT 6 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136748 O.P.R.T.C.T. [F] TRACT 3 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136746 O.P.R.T.C.T. [G] TRACT 1 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136747 O.P.R.T.C.T. W 5TH STREET (60' R.O.W.) 0 1 T O L 9 T O L 9 T O L 8 T O L 8 T O L 7 T O L 7 T O L 6 T O L 6 T O L 5 T O L CALLED 0.147 ACRE 1213 WESTT FIFTH LP DOC.NO. 2013089350 O.P.R.T.C.T. CALLED 0.4571 ACRE BR WEST 5TH LANDCO LLC DOC.NO. 2025093866 O.P.R.T.C.T. SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK NO. 2 OF THE DUVAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1 DIVISION Z VOL. 1, PG. 119 P.R.T.C.T. [A] " A " E N I L H C T A M 5 T O L 4 T O L [B] [C] 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING 1 STORY METAL & FRAME BUILDING 2 1 T O L 1 1 T O L [E] [D] 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING (1) 1 STORY BRICK & FRAME BUILDING [F] (2) (3) 1.0067 ACRE(S) 43,851 SQUARE FEET W 4TH STREET (30' R.O.W.) T E E R T S D R A H C R O ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( P.O.B. MATCHLINE "B" P.O.B. (1) 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING (2) STORAGE UNIT (3) STORAGE UNIT T E E R T S H S L A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 3 ( ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF 1.1730 ACRES OUT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK NO. 2 DUVAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1, DIVISION Z AND THE SUBDIVISION OF EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1 IN DIVISION Z OF THE OUTLOTS ADJOINING BLOCK NO. 1 City of Austin, Travis County, Texas A Limited Liability Company PO Box 90876, Austin Texas 78709 INFO@4WARDLS.COM (512) 537-2384 TBPELS FIRM #10174300
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits May 6, 2026 DA-2026-038813 1208 West 4th Street 18 – 1 Proposal Demolish a Quonset hut currently used as a brewery and a ca. 1910 back house. Architecture The main structure of this complex of buildings and additions is a Quonset hut, which was moved to its current location from Camp Mabry in the 1970s, though no permit records could be found confirming this. Its distinctive curved enclosure currently houses a brewery and associated back of house spaces. The original material of the roof structure is intact, but new walls at the east and west side were constructed around 2020 when the current business opened. The historic material that remains is in relatively good condition, considering the design intent of Quonset huts as being temporary or quick-to-construct shelter. To the side, a wooden tongue-and-groove clad back house is currently used for additional brewery space, and it appears that, when the Quonset hut was moved to its current location, it was placed very near this structure. Research As stated above, there are few records that exist of the hut’s origin beyond that it was constructed for Camp Mabry and was moved on site in the 1970s. Aerial imagery of the property from before this shows a largely empty lot, with the exception of the back house. There appears to be vehicles and various materials stored on the site. It is unknown whether there were previous structures that are illegible in historic aerials, as permit records for this property are scarce. Department Comments This application will time out on July 20, 2026. Property Evaluation The 2025 Downtown Austin historic resource survey lists the both the Quonset hut structure and the back house as medium priorities, though there is no specific recommendation for preservation. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is an intact and well maintained Quonset hut, which retains its legibility behind recent additions and porch/shade structures. However, the structure was not original to the property and was moved to its current location in the 1970s. b. Historical association. The property may have significant historical associations, as a …
[A] 1205 1/2 W. 5TH, LLC DOC. NO. 2015111217 O.P.R.T.C.T. [B] TRACT 2 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136745 O.P.R.T.C.T. [C] TRACT 5 1205 1/2 W. 5TH, LLC DOC. NO. 2020136742 O.P.R.T.C.T. [D] TRACT 4 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136743 O.P.R.T.C.T. [E] TRACT 6 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136748 O.P.R.T.C.T. [F] TRACT 3 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136746 O.P.R.T.C.T. [G] TRACT 1 STEVEN D. OGDEN DOC. NO. 2020136747 O.P.R.T.C.T. W 5TH STREET (60' R.O.W.) 0 1 T O L 9 T O L 9 T O L 8 T O L 8 T O L 7 T O L 7 T O L 6 T O L 6 T O L 5 T O L CALLED 0.147 ACRE 1213 WESTT FIFTH LP DOC.NO. 2013089350 O.P.R.T.C.T. CALLED 0.4571 ACRE BR WEST 5TH LANDCO LLC DOC.NO. 2025093866 O.P.R.T.C.T. SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK NO. 2 OF THE DUVAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1 DIVISION Z VOL. 1, PG. 119 P.R.T.C.T. [A] " A " E N I L H C T A M 5 T O L 4 T O L [B] [C] 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING 1 STORY METAL & FRAME BUILDING 2 1 T O L 1 1 T O L [E] [D] 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING (1) 1 STORY BRICK & FRAME BUILDING [F] (2) (3) 1.0067 ACRE(S) 43,851 SQUARE FEET W 4TH STREET (30' R.O.W.) T E E R T S D R A H C R O ) . . W O R . ' 0 5 ( P.O.B. MATCHLINE "B" P.O.B. (1) 1 STORY FRAME BUILDING (2) STORAGE UNIT (3) STORAGE UNIT T E E R T S H S L A W ) . . W O R . ' 0 3 ( ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OF 1.1730 ACRES OUT OF THE SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK NO. 2 DUVAL SUBDIVISION OF THE EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1, DIVISION Z AND THE SUBDIVISION OF EAST HALF OF LOT NO. 1 IN DIVISION Z OF THE OUTLOTS ADJOINING BLOCK NO. 1 City of Austin, Travis County, Texas A Limited Liability Company PO Box 90876, Austin Texas 78709 INFO@4WARDLS.COM (512) 537-2384 TBPELS FIRM #10174300
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION May 6, 2026 Briefing: National Register of Historic Places Nominations 2300 Rosewood Avenue, 2406 Rosewood Avenue, 1201-1203 Lavaca Street, 3304 East 12th Street 20 – 1 Proposal A valid nomination to the National Register of Historic Places has been submitted to the Texas Historical Commission for the following historic properties: Rosewood Avenue Park, 2300 Rosewood Avenue Rosewood Elementary School, 2406 Rosewood Avenue First Methodist Church, 1201-1203 Lavaca Street Evergreen Cemetery, 3304 East 12th Street Austin’s Historic Landmark Commission is required by the provisions of the State of Texas Certified Local Government program to comment on National Register nominations and to notify the THC and CLG program coordinators of its position. The nominations will be heard by the Texas Historical Commission’s State Board of Review on May 16, 2026. Copies of all draft nominations and meeting information are available at www.thc.gov/sbrmeeting and in backup materials. Recommendation Recommend approval of all nominations to the State Board of Review.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20260506-20 Date: May 6, 2026 Subject: National Register Applications at May 16, 2026 Texas Historical Commission State Board of Review Recommendation 20260506-20 Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Rosewood Avenue Park at 2300 Rosewood Avenue to the State Board of Review. Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Rosewood Elementary School at 2406 Rosewood Avenue to the State Board of Review. Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the First Methodist Church at 1201-1203 Lavaca Street to the State Board of Review. Recommend approval of the National Register of Historic Places nomination of the Evergreen Cemetery at 3304 East 12th Street to the State Board of Review. Motioned by_______. Seconded by __________. Vote Votes in favor: Votes against: Absent: _______________________________ Attest: Kalan Contreras Historic Preservation Officer Austin Planning Department
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Evergreen Cemetery Other name/site number: NA Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 3304 E. 12th Street City or town: Austin Not for publication: State: Texas Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification County: Travis As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ( nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title State Historic Preservation Officer __________________________ Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Evergreen Cemetery, Austin, Travis, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 buildings sites structures objects total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: NA 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: FUNERARY/cemetery Current Functions: FUNERARY/cemetery 7. Description Architectural Classification: NA Principal Exterior Materials: STONE, CONCRETE Narrative Description (see continuation sheets xx) Page 2 SBR Draft United States Department of the …
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: First Methodist Church Other name/site number: First United Methodist Church (current) Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 1201-1203 Lavaca Street State: Texas City or town: Austin Vicinity: Not for publication: County: Travis 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ( nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 First Methodist Church, Austin, Travis County, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 buildings sites structures objects total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: RELIGIOUS: Church Current Functions: RELIGIOUS: Church 7. Description Architectural Classification: Neoclassical Revival; Modern Movement Principal Exterior Materials: Brick; Stone; Stained Glass Narrative Description …
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Rosewood Elementary School Other name/site number: F. R. Rice Alternative Learning Center, Texans CAN! Academy Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 2406 Rosewood Avenue State: Texas City or town: Austin Vicinity: Not for publication: County: Travis 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this (nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title ___________________________ ___________________________ Date State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Rosewood Elementary School, Austin, Travis County, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 2 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 buildings sites structures objects total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: Education: School Current Functions: Vacant/Not in Use 7. Description Architectural Classification: MODERN MOVEMENT: PWA Moderne; MID-CENTURY MODERN NONRESIDENTIAL Principal Exterior Materials: Brick, Glass, Concrete, Wood Narrative …
NPS Form 10-900 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OMB No. 1024-0018 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Rosewood Park Other name/site number: Rosewood Neighborhood Park Name of related multiple property listing: NA 2. Location Street & number: 2300 Rosewood Avenue State: Texas City or town: Austin Vicinity: Not for publication: County: Travis 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D Signature of certifying official / Title State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________ State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ___ entered in the National Register ___ determined eligible for the National Register ___ determined not eligible for the National Register. ___ removed from the National Register ___ other, explain: _____________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action SBR Draft United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Rosewood Park, Austin, Travis County, Texas 5. Classification Ownership of Property X Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property X building(s) district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 5 3 4 5 17 4 1 3 15 23 buildings sites structures objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0 6. Function or Use Historic Functions: Recreation and Culture: sports facility, outdoor recreation; Landscape: park Current Functions: Recreation and Culture: sports facility, outdoor recreation; Landscape: park 7. Description Architectural Classification: No style Principal …
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING PARTNERSHIP WITH THE AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL 4/27/26 WHEREAS: The Barton Creek bridge in Zilker park was constructed in 1926 as a two lane bridge and expanded in 1945 and 1946 to four lanes, and the bridge is located in a National Register District, Whereas: The Historic Landmark Commission learned in March, that the 100-year old Barton Springs Bridge was slated for demolition and replacement. At the same time, members learned that a Council decision to demolish the bridge was made two years ago without any consultation with HLC, nor the examination of the accurate facts concerning the condition of the bridge. And, members were informed that the recommendation for demolishing the bridge had not gone through the City-mandated review process, which included a reviews by other board and commissions, and including the Historic Landmark Commission review. Beginning the review process after a Council action had already been taken in the process has created unnecessary discord and community outrage. It did, however, provide the HLC with the opportunity—albeit after the fact--to delve into the information about the viability of the bridge and the options for remediation. Whereas, with the limited information provided, there is reason to believe that the condition of the bridge has been misrepresented to the Council and that options for retaining the bridge has not been explored or have been withheld from objective evaluation. For example, the initial HLC presentation included misleading claims regarding the cost of rehabilitation vs. the cost of replacement, how long the bridge might last if remediation is chosen over replacement, lack of clarity on the federal standards and how the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) could govern the development process. In response to tough questions from Commissioners about the validity of the engineering studies, and conclusions drawn from them, the request for HLC review of the demotion request has been put on hold. However, a follow- up briefing did little to dispel Commissioner’s concerns and many questions remain unanswered. Whereas, there is sufficient evidence that if the Council-required process for review of proposed demolition had not been by-passed, and in particular, the advice and expertise from members of the HLC had been included, the Council might not have approved the bridge demolition and a great deal of rancor could have been avoided. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The Historic Landmark Commission requests that the Council’s decision to demolish the Barton Springs …
Historic Landmark Commission Homeowner Response 304 W 42nd Street 1. The Home’s original location does not meet the intent of the area and is not compatible with Hyde Park’s NCCD Ordinance # 20101216-093 Design standards for both Remodeling and New Construction. The Home is located at the rear of the property, and 5’ of the existing structure is currently non-compliant with current City building guidelines for setbacks. The Ordinance requires 5.9 New construction garages to be detached and at the rear of the property, Carports can’t face the front of the building. This creates a hardship for the Owner, as the current location of the home will not allow for remodeling. The Owner wants to add a garage or carport, and the proposed way to alleviate the homeowner’s hardship is to construct a new Home within the NCCD’s guidelines and get the parking (carport) at the rear portion of the property. 2. Part 7 of Hyde Park NCCD shows that the intent of the property is to locate the House facing Ave C. Part 7 of The Hyde Park NCCD # 2009423-092, as well as current City Regulations, would require this property to Face Ave C. The City will consider the narrow or shorter side of the property Ave C the front regarding current setbacks 25’ front and the corner, longer side 15’ the side setback, side property. Reviewing the 3 corresponding corner properties (see attached) of 42nd street at Ave C, 4201 Ave C, 4114 Ave C and 4115 Ave C, all are front facing Ave C, all at the front setback line. The house at 304 W 42nd Street is built at the rear of the property line currently encroaching The City of Austin’s rear setback guidelines. 3. 4.2 of The Ordinance #20101216-093 requires that any new Additions be located at the rear or rear side to be less visible from the street. This part of the Ordinance gives additional hardship to the Owner as the current location of the existing home is entirely at the rear of the property and would not allow for any new additions because any new additions or alterations could only go to the front of the Lot and facing Ave C. The Owner wants a garage or carport, so there is no way of keeping part of the current homes “elevation” since this is the only location on the lot for a …
H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N · M A Y 6 , 2 0 2 6 1511 Rainbow Bend Application to Demolish a ca. 1935 Contributing Building Item #10 · PR-2026-030473 Old West Austin National Register Historic District · Council District 10 Presented by Patrick & Charlotte Beathard, property owners p r e s e r v a t i o n @ a u s t i n t e x a s . g o v · C i t y S t a f f : K a l a n C o n t r e r a s 0 2 · T H E I N T E G R I T Y T E S T What §25-2-352 Requires for Integrity § 2 5 - 2 - 3 5 2 · A G E § 2 5 - 2 - 3 5 2 · I N T E G R I T Y I N T E G R I T Y · N P S B U L L E T I N 1 5 More than 50 years old A high degree of integrity Seven aspects of integrity The property must be at least 50 years old. The property must retain “a high degree of integrity, NPS National Register Bulletin 15 defines integrity 1935 — 91 years old. Satisfied. Not at issue. as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, through seven aspects: that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity.” The highlighted phrase is the crux of our case. Location · Design · Setting · Materials · Workmanship · Feeling · Association For an architecturally-significant property, the three highlighted aspects — Design, Materials, Workmanship — are most critical. Age is satisfied. Integrity is where the case turns — and Design, Materials, and Workmanship are the aspects we will examine. 1 5 1 1 R A I N B O W B E N D · I T E M # 1 0 · P R - 2 0 2 6 - 0 3 0 4 7 3 2 / 15 0 3 · W H E R E I N T E G R I T Y F …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Hi Hunter and HPO, CleanTag Permits Friday, May 1, 2026 2:48 PM Historic Preservation Office Re: HLC Supporting Documentation for 1511 Rainbow Bend BOA-C15-92-034~001.TIF External Email - Exercise Caution We reviewed the documentation package for 1511 Rainbow Bend and have a couple of questions. 1. Is the documentation package narrative stating that the residence has not undergone significant additions? In 1992 a Board of Adjustment variance request was approved for an exterior staircase to provide access to a proposed third story addition. The description of the proposed addition matches the third story board and batten portion of the residence. The interior photos available in the real estate listing for the property show more clearly that the board and batten portions of the residence are not original. The documentation package doesn't mention the early 90s variance or the addition which appears to have increased the size of the residence by 50% or more of it's original square footage. I could not locate any building permits for the addition, but it appears that more than the just a third story was added. The board and batten areas all look to have been added at the same time. I have attached the Board of Adjustment file is attached for reference. 2. Would these additions affect the recommendation for consideration of historic zoning? Kind regards, Linda Linda Sullivan Isabel Villegas CleanTag Permits 2320 Webberville Rd Austin, TX 78702 512-826-4209 cleantagpermits.com On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 6:05 PM CleanTag Permits < Thanks Hunter! 1 wrote:
March 27, 2026 To the Austin Historic Landmark Commission: We, the undersigned neighbors and nearby residents, support the proposed demolition and reconstruction project at 1511 Rainbow Bend. We understand that the existing house is proposed to be replaced with a new residence. Based on what has been shared with us, we support the project and believe the proposed new home will be an appropriate improvement for the property and a positive addition to the neighborhood. We also understand that the new construction is intended to respect the character of Old Enfield and remain generally consistent with the existing site layout. For these reasons, we support approval of the proposed demolition and reconstruction at 1511 Rainbow Bend. Sincerely, Name: ______________________________ Address: ____________________________ Signature: __________________________ Date: _______________________________ Docusign Envelope ID: 494C89FD-C160-8636-8026-A2ED3FDD1AB55/4/2026Diego Mendez-Sabre1515 Pease Road March 27, 2026 To the Austin Historic Landmark Commission: We, the undersigned neighbors and nearby residents, support the proposed demolition and reconstruction project at 1511 Rainbow Bend. We understand that the existing house is proposed to be replaced with a new residence. Based on what has been shared with us, we support the project and believe the proposed new home will be an appropriate improvement for the property and a positive addition to the neighborhood. We also understand that the new construction is intended to respect the character of Old Enfield and remain generally consistent with the existing site layout. For these reasons, we support approval of the proposed demolition and reconstruction at 1511 Rainbow Bend. Sincerely, Name: ______________________________ Address: ____________________________ Signature: __________________________ Date: _______________________________ Elizabeth and Ryan Taylor2300 Pease Road, Austin, TX 787035/4/26
April 27, 2026 Kalan Contreras, MSHP Historic Preservation Officer Austin Planning Department RE: 507 Park Blvd- Condition and Historic Assessment Dear Ms. Contreras: I have been asked by the owners of the above property to assess its physical condition and architectural significance with regard to whether it qualifies as a historic landmark. I am a licensed architect with over 30 years of professional experience, including in the remodel and preservation of historic landmark homes. The house on the property was built in 1922 and is approximately 1966 square feet in size. There is evidence of multiple additions. Further, the house is a one-story craftsman style, and non-sympathetic additions are visible from the front which detract from the front gable and overall facade. In my assessment of this structure my findings are that the architectural significance of the structure is low and its physical condition is poor, making it unworthy of preservation. My specific findings are in the attached. I appreciate your consideration of this report, and I am available at any time to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, Bart Whatley, Architect Delineate Studio | architecture . urban design 916 Springdale #4-104 Austin TX 78702 512-522-3511 Page 1 of 3 507 Park Blvd- Condition and Historic Assessment After studying the house, I have found the architectural significance of the home to be low and its physical condition poor. While it may be possible to correct the structural issues affecting the home, the cost of doing so would be very high and unjustifiable in consideration of its low architectural significance. The architectural significance is low. 1. The original chimney has been removed. 2. A portion of an addition visible from the front has a cantilevered space fitting under an original eave, with a projecting garden window. This addition detracts from the original integrity. 3. Addition windows are metal/composite material and not consistent in proportion or material to the original wood windows. 4. The craftsman style of the house is generic & lacks features that many other bungalows have, such as flared porch columns or decorative rafter tails. 5. The underside of roof eaves at portions of the additions are exposed OSB. As to the physical condition of the house, some portions of the interior of the house are in fair condition, but the house is mostly in poor condition. The more significant problems are as follows: 1. The front façade …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Holly Neighbors Sunday, May 3, 2026 9:07 PM Historic Preservation Office; Holly Neighborhood Association Board Case # PR 2026-040403; 1808 Cesar Chavez, 'Weather Up' property You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Commissioners, I am writing on behalf of the Holly Neighborhood Association on the case number above, regarding the property at 1808 Chavez. This home most recently held the Weather Up bar, but has sat vacant for several years. The Historic Landmark Commission is set to hear the application for demolition on this Tuesday, May 8. We would request a delay in order to more fully inform neighbors of the application and the history of the house, give them an opportunity to address the Commission. The staff notes that the application times out in July. Your consideration of the neighbor's interest in the property would be greatly appreciated. Sandra Boone, President Holly Neighborhood Association Bringing old and new together. CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1 Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Sarah Arvey Tuesday, May 5, 2026 9:32 AM Historic Preservation Office 1808 E Cesar Chavez You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution I'm utterly opposed to the demolition of 1808 Cesar Chavez, which most recently housed WeatherUp bar. This property is identified by the Landmark Commission as being built in the 1930s, and originally housed a barber shop and beauty salon for many years. The property was identified by the 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey as eligible as a City of Austin Landmark. Developers continue to bulldoze through East Austin, and there is very little opportunity for residents to take action. While the Preservation Austin might not deem this building important, it is critical that local residents have a say in what happens to their neighborhood. I truly dislike the fact that all I can do is write this email. I have wanted to speak when attending online meetings/hearings and there is no way for attendees to voice their opinions in this forum. This is truly unfortunate. Thank you. Sarah Arvey -- …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Mark Ashby, Jeff Callahan, Scott Campbell, Marc Carlson, Hunter Coleman, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington April 30, 2026 Historic Landmark Commission 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Re: DA-2026-038798 - 403 Orchard Street DA-2026-038813 -1208 West 4th Street Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee recently met with the applicant regarding the proposed demolition of the structures at 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street. OWANA was first notified of this request on Tuesday, April 28, and met with the applicant thereafter on Thursday, April 30. At the time of the meeting, the applicant was able to provide only limited details regarding both the historical significance of either structure and any future plans for the site. During our discussion, we emphasized the importance of preserving contributing structures within the district, as the cumulative loss of such buildings could jeopardize the district’s historic designation. Based on our understanding, the structures appear to be in good condition. We strongly encourage allowing additional time for staff to conduct further archival research, which may reveal information supporting potential landmark designations. The 2025 Downtown Austin historic resource survey lists 403 Orchard Street as a high priority and eligible for the National Register as an individual resource. If the findings do not yield criteria to meet the metrics of nomination, OWANA recommends that the applicant make a genuine effort to relocate and financially fund expenses related to the relocation of these structures. Supporting and maintaining the integrity of our National Historic District is of great importance to OWANA. Given the limited information and limited amount of time currently available before the May 6th Landmark Commission meeting, OWANA supports a Landmark Commission initiated postponement of both demolition cases, 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street, to allow for a more thorough understanding of the structures and site. We hope the applicant will agree that this is a prudent and necessary step in the process. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, Inc. OWANA
403 Orchard Street Historic Landmark Commission Item 17: DA-2026-038798 May 6, 2026 1 Demolition Application 2 Proximity: Downtown Austin Historic Resources Survey 3 Proximity: Local Historic Districts 4 Proximity: National Register Historic District Texas Historic Sites Atlas 5 Landmark Designation Criteria LDC 25-2-352: 1. years ago; and The property must be 50 years old and must represent a period of significance of at least 50 2. The property must retain a high degree of integrity, as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity; and 3. Demonstrates significance in at least two of the following categories: • Architecture • Historical Associations • Archaeology • Community Value • Landscape Feature 6 Staff Report and Recommendation 7 Request We respectfully request staff recommendation for the requested total demolition of the structure located at 403 Orchard Street and release of the demolition permit upon receipt of a City of Austin Documentation Package. 8 9 i. Architecture ARCHITECURE CRITERIA: Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; × Exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; Displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; × Represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; × Serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; × Possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or × Represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY: • 1917 Single-Family House • National Folk stylistic influence • No alterations noted • Not eligible for local historic district designation • Individually eligible for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) designation 10 Landmark Designation Criteria ii. Historical Associations. institutions, The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. • Occupants from 1920-1970: • 1920: Tidwell, A.D. • 1927: W.P. Payne • 1935: I.A. Payne & W.P. Payne • 1940: Mrs. M.A. Payne • 1944: …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Mark Ashby, Jeff Callahan, Scott Campbell, Marc Carlson, Hunter Coleman, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington April 30, 2026 Historic Landmark Commission 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Re: DA-2026-038798 - 403 Orchard Street DA-2026-038813 -1208 West 4th Street Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee recently met with the applicant regarding the proposed demolition of the structures at 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street. OWANA was first notified of this request on Tuesday, April 28, and met with the applicant thereafter on Thursday, April 30. At the time of the meeting, the applicant was able to provide only limited details regarding both the historical significance of either structure and any future plans for the site. During our discussion, we emphasized the importance of preserving contributing structures within the district, as the cumulative loss of such buildings could jeopardize the district’s historic designation. Based on our understanding, the structures appear to be in good condition. We strongly encourage allowing additional time for staff to conduct further archival research, which may reveal information supporting potential landmark designations. The 2025 Downtown Austin historic resource survey lists 403 Orchard Street as a high priority and eligible for the National Register as an individual resource. If the findings do not yield criteria to meet the metrics of nomination, OWANA recommends that the applicant make a genuine effort to relocate and financially fund expenses related to the relocation of these structures. Supporting and maintaining the integrity of our National Historic District is of great importance to OWANA. Given the limited information and limited amount of time currently available before the May 6th Landmark Commission meeting, OWANA supports a Landmark Commission initiated postponement of both demolition cases, 403 Orchard Street and 1208 West 4th Street, to allow for a more thorough understanding of the structures and site. We hope the applicant will agree that this is a prudent and necessary step in the process. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, Inc. OWANA
1208 W. 4th Street Historic Landmark Commission Item 18: DA-2026-038813 May 6, 2026 1 Demolition Application 2 Proximity: Downtown Austin Historic Resources Survey 3 Proximity: Local Historic Districts 4 Proximity: National Register Historic District Texas Historic Sites Atlas 5 1960 Sanborn Map 6 Landmark Designation Criteria LDC 25-2-352: 1. years ago; and The property must be 50 years old and must represent a period of significance of at least 50 2. The property must retain a high degree of integrity, as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity; and 3. Demonstrates significance in at least two of the following categories: • Architecture • Historical Associations • Archaeology • Community Value • Landscape Feature 7 i. Architecture ARCHITECURE CRITERIA: Embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; Exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; × Displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; × Represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; × Serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; × Possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or × Represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY: • Quonset Hut • No stylistic influences visible • Not eligible for local or NRHP designation • Side porch addition • Fenestration pattern altered • All windows and doors replaced Engineers Constructing Quonset Hut, 1944-1945 Unknown Location The Portal to Texas History 8 Landmark Designation Criteria ii. Historical Associations. institutions, The property has long-standing significant associations with persons, groups, businesses, or events of historic importance which contributed significantly to the history of the city, state, or nation; or represents a significant portrayal of the cultural practices or the way of life of a definable group of people in a historic time. Built in 1940 and relocated from Camp Mabry (National Register of Historic Places) in the 1970s. Camp Mabry Gate, 1918 The Portal to Texas History Camp Mabry Buildings, 1942 The Portal to Texas History 9 Landmark Designation Criteria × Archaeology. The property has, or is expected to yield, significant data concerning the …
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Thursday, April 30, 2026, at 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS Judah Rice, Chair Jeffrey Acton Trey McWhorter AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order or, for remote participation, no later than noon the day before the meeting, will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on March 18, 2026. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Operations Committee workplan. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. Discussion and possible action on eligible expenses for the historic district tax abatement. Discussion and possible action on Historic Sign Standards. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. For assistance, please contact the Liaison or TTY users’ route through 711. A person may request language access accommodations no later than 48 hours before the scheduled meeting. Please call or email Cara Bertron at Austin Planning at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov to request service or for additional information. For more information on the Operations Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.
REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION OPERATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, March 18, 2026, at 11 a.m. Permitting and Development Center, Room 1203 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive AUSTIN, TEXAS Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference. CURRENT COMMISSIONERS _X_ Judah Rice, Chair _X_ Jeffrey Acton ___ Trey McWhorter DRAFT MEETING MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL No public communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Operations Committee regular meeting on February 18, 2026. MOTION: Approve the minutes from February 18, 2026 on a motion by Commissioner Acton, Commissioner Rice seconding. Vote: 2-0. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff briefing regarding ways to approach concerns about structural issues in older buildings. Presentation by Cara Bertron, Program Manager II, Austin Planning, and Kalan Contreras, Principal Planner, Austin Planning. • Commissioners discussed getting feedback from applicants. • Commissioners discussed working with Austin Development Services staff to raise contractor awareness around compliance and identify issues early. • Staff provided an update on Development Services review. integrating historic preservation processes with DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Discussion of potential changes to the Land Development Code regarding historic preservation. • Commissioners discussed a conversation among the full commission about streamlining processes. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. 5. Discussion and possible action on eligible expenses for the historic district tax abatement. • Commissioners discussed adding permanent accessibility improvements, hazardous material abatement, and indoor air quality systems to eligible expenses. Discussion and possible action on Historic Sign Standards. • Commissioners reviewed the standards and agreed to do a more detailed review at their next meeting. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT 12:48 p.m. For more information on the Operations Committee, please contact Cara Bertron at (512) 974-1446 or cara.bertron@austintexas.gov.
ELIGIBLE EXPENSES: Per 11-1-63 (6) of City Code, only work for which a certificate of appropriateness or City permit is required is included in determining whether the proposed work exceeds the specified percentage of pre-restoration value. ELIGIBLE EXPENSES: • Labor/materials related to eligible costs • Demolition related to eligible costs or to remove non-historic exterior additions and features • Repair, restoration, or replacement of historic façade and landscape features, including reconstruction of missing features • Exterior masonry and siding repair • Roofing • Foundation • Structural repairs • Gutters • Windows, including permanent weatherization measures • Exterior doors and permanent weatherization measures • Permanent HVAC systems (permanent) • Permanent eElectrical, plumbing, and gas systems (permanent) • Escalators and eElevators • Fire eEscapes • Sprinkler/fFire suppression systems • Security systems requiring installation permits (if permit required for installation) • Interior partitions, ceilings, and/or floors requiring installation permits (if permit required for installation) • Signage • Solar panels and other long-term sustainability “sustainable” improvements • Exterior paint • Exterior and interior ramps • Exterior handrails • Exterior lifts • Changes to make the exterior grade and/or existing sidewalks accessible • Repair of existing sidewalks • Widening secondary exterior doorways • Widening interior doorways • Sales tax for eligible expenses • Interior tub-to-shower conversions, except shower tiling • Other plumbing work to enhance accessibility, including lowering sinks and replacing toilets • Above listed work on outbuildings deemed contributing structures INELIGIBLE EXPENSES: • Light fixtures • Interior finish work, e.g., painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work • Appliances • Furniture • Window treatments other than permanent weatherization measures • Construction of or repair to dDecks/ and patios not original to building • Demolition costs related to removal of contributing buildings or structures • Construction of new buildings or additions • Non-historic landscape features, (e.g., retaining walls, fencing, paving, planters, vegetation, paths, or sidewalks, ) unless the changes are for accessibility purposes (see Eligible Expenses list) • Parking lot construction or expansion • Architectural and engineering fees • Building permit, variance, zoning, or platting application fees • Feasibility studies • Financing fees • Leasing expenses • Storm sewer costs • Legal and /aAccounting fees • Purchase or repair of , or repair to, construction tools and equipment • Taxes, except sales tax for eligible expenses Adopted December 2012
HLC – Operations Committee Proposed Signage Language Modifications January 19, 2026 Memorandum Date: March 13, 2026 To: Operations Committee Subject: Proposed Signage Guidelines Modifications The following is proposed direct modifications to the COA sign requirements (for historic districts and landmarks): Guidelines for Signage in National Registered Historic Districts, Local Historic Districts and City of Austin Historic Landmarks --- I added “Local Historic Districts” to the title of the document. --- The Historic Landmark Commission and City Historic Preservation Office consider the following guidelines in reviewing sign applications. --- The text above does not differentiate new and existing signage. It is recommended that the word “new” be added in from of “sign”. As discussed further below, there is currently no direction provided regarding existing signage. It is generally recommended that this be included within this document. --- --- it is further recommended to provide the definition of signage from the Land Development Code or reference the Land Development Code within the document. The definition for signage, provided in Section 25-10-4 (18) is very inclusive. Further discussion is warranted where the existing language below does not necessarily capture the effects that new signage could have on historic buildings. --- General Introduction Existing no introduction provided Proposed These guidelines are intended to provide guidance regarding requirements for new signage along with the preservation and maintenance of existing signage. The City of Austin Design Standards and Guidelines for Historic Properties apply to all exterior modifications to properties that are located within National Historic Districts, Local Historic Districts, or are individually designated as City of Austin Landmarks. This section specifically applies to all types of exterior signage. Number of Signs Existing The Commission allows one sign per building unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. Proposed Each building will be allowed one sign unless the building has multiple tenants. In the case of multiple tenants, one sign per façade module is permitted provided that the modules correspond to tenant spaces. One sign per building façade is permitted where the building is located at a street corner or faces multiple street frontages. A single directory sign …
