HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-112941; GF-2025-121036 2821 Salado Street 12 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1925 house and garage and a ca. 1982 pool. Architecture The house is a one-story Spanish Eclectic bungalow with stucco cladding, an arched entryway, and a Mission-style tapered chimney. A front addition appears to have been constructed during the mid-twentieth century, as the building was converted into a duplex sometime after 1959. The garage is a simple board-and-batten structure with a pyramidal hipped roof. Research 2821 Salado Street was constructed between 1924 and 1925. Its first residents were Everette E. and Hattie C. Pittman. The Pittman family occupied the home for 55 years. Everette Pittman was a World War I veteran and University of Texas-educated civil engineer who served as the Chief Draftsman for the Texas Highway Department. He worked at the Department for 37 years before moving to the City of Austin’s engineering division. He died in 1962. Hattie Pittman continued to live in the home until her death in 1980. She was an avid entertainer and hosted the Book Trailers club for much of its 50-plus-year run. Property Evaluation The 2020 University-Windsor-Hyde Park historic resources survey lists both the primary building and the garage as contributing to a potential local historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The primary building appears to retain moderate integrity, while the garage appears to retain low integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Spanish Eclectic-style architecture, though the front addition introduces some incompatible elements. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property was not evaluated for its ability to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 DA-2025-142965; GF-2025-146214 Rosedale School 2117 W. 49th Street 13 – 1 Proposal Partially demolish a circa 1939 school building, deconstructing and reconstructing an original portion of the façade nearer to the street and constructing a 5-story apartment building atop the reclaimed façade. Architecture The Rosedale School is a one-story brick school building with Modern stylistic influences. The original portion of the building is a simple flat-roofed brick structure with decorative string courses and expansive multi-light casement windows. Additions, constructed between 1946 and 1949 by two firms (Kuehne, Giesecke, and Brooks and Page, Southerland, and Page), replaced the original entrance with glass block windows and shifted the new entrance eastwards. The new shed- and flat-roofed wings with multi-light casements, glass block ribbon windows, and brick veneer comprised 10 additional classrooms plus a gym and cafeteria/auditorium.1 A 1949 Austin Statesman article advertising the opening of the new addition notes that the “highly modern Rosedale school” is “considered a model of functional design” following Dr. Darrell B. Harmon’s principles for classroom design.2 The extensive use of glass block and retention of maximum natural lighting in four “experimental” classrooms was dictated by the design hypothesis developed by Harmon, Director of Educational Services in the State Health Department: The south side of Rosedale School will have special windows. …The blocks will promote even distribution of light, and the vision strip will allow the children to see out. The remaining four rooms will be equipped with auxiliary diffusers based on an original design by Dr. Harmon which are placed inside the windows. These diffusers obtain maximum benefit from direct sunlight without permitting excessive brightness and threw light upward and across the ceiling from which it is reflected downward on the child’s work. This will be the only school coordinating natural and artificial light…3 Harmon’s work on the “Rosedale model” of classroom illumination was influential to educational design on a national scale during the mid-20th century. In a 2008 article for the Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Amy Ogata describes the impact of the Rosedale model on American school design: The planning, forms, and materials of postwar schools reflected ongoing research into airflow, lighting, and reflectivity…Darell Boyd Harmon, an educator and director of school services at the Texas State Department of Health, also explored how natural light varied in the classroom. …Believing that …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 DA-2025-141132 906 West 22nd Street 14 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1927 building. Architecture The property at 906 West 22nd Street in the West Campus neighborhood is a two-story intact Folk Victorian house with an L-shaped plan. It features a front porch at the right half of the front façade which is recessed under the second floor and supported by three wood posts. The house is built on piers and sits a few feet above grade. At the left, one leg of the L projects toward the street and is covered with a steep pitched gable, which creates enough height to house living space within. There appears to have been alterations made to the original roof above the porch to create more living space, which was permitted in 1948. It is unknown how much alteration of the original roof took place at that time. Research This house was originally owned by Jesse and Emily Hornsby, who were farmers either at this address or further out from Austin, making this possibly a second property closer to the city. Jesse Hornsby passed away in 1933, with the funeral services taking place at the property. For a short time after, the house was vacant, but was purchased around 1941 by David and Irene Crenshaw. At time of purchase, David Crenshaw was employed as a clerk, but in the next few years, through the 1950s and possibly further, made their living renting out rooms to University of Texas students. The address is connected with numerous names in periodicals form the time, typically students and other short-term renters It was during this time that the conversion of the second floor into additional living quarters occurred. Property Evaluation The 2020 North Central Austin historic resource survey lists the property as individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places as well as eligible for a Austin City landmark. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate-to-high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Folk Victorian architecture, even with 1948 alterations. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. …
THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MAY OCCUR BY HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. . p p A I S N O S V E R I 20 0 10 20 SCALE: 1" = 20' EXISTING LEGEND W W WW WW FIRE HYDRANT W/ GATE VALVE WATERLINE W/ GATE VALVE WASTEWATER W/ MANHOLE WASTEWATER W/ CLEANOUT STORM SEWER W/ MANHOLE CURB INLET 4-SIDED AREA INLET t e a D . o N OHE Z OVERHEAD ELECTRIC W/POWER POLE 3504 700 PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS GROUND CONTOUR TREE LEGEND TREE TO REMAIN (8"-18") TREE TO BE REMOVED (8"-18") PROTECTED TREE TO REMAIN (19"-23") PROTECTED TREE TO BE REMOVED (19"-23") HERITAGE TREE TO REMAIN (24"+) HERITAGE TREE TO BE REMOVED (24"+) DEMOLITION LEGEND LIMITS OF DEMOLITION DEMOLITION AREA DEMOLITION LINE TREE PROTECTION EROSION LEGEND LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION ROCK BERM TREE PROTECTION MULCH LOG STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA TEMPORARY SPOILS AREA FLOW DIRECTION NOTES: 1. AE CUSTOMER SERVICE TO BE CONTACTED FOR DISCONNECTION OF ELECTRICAL SERVICES AT 512-494-9400 2. CAPPING AND PLUGGING OF WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES AS PER THE PLUMBING CODE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN FIVE FEET (5') OF PROPERTY LINE. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS ARE TO BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING. 4. SEE DETAIL 520S-2 ON SHEET 2 FOR ABANDONMENT OF W/WW SERVICES 5. TREE PROTECTION FENCING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TREES WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DESTRUCTION ON SITE BEFORE DEMOLITION OCCURS. WHERE FENCING CANNOT BE PLACED TO PROTECT THE EXTENT OF THE CRZ WITH NATURAL GROUND COVER, PROVIDE AN 8” LAYER OF ORGANIC HARDWOOD MULCH OUTSIDE OF THE FENCING. 7. 6. STRAPPING 2X4 OR THICKER LUMBER (TO MATCH HEIGHT OF BUILDING) SECURELY AROUND TREE TRUNK, BUTTRESS ROOTS, AND ROOT FLARE, IS REQUIRED IF FENCING CANNOT GO AROUND THE ENTIRE HALF CRZ. IF PRUNING IS NECESSARY DURING DEMOLITION, IT SHOULD TAKE PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF THE DEMOLITION PROCESS. IT MUST BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED ARBORIST AND NO MORE THAN 25% IS PERMITTED. PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION FOR ALL TREES 8 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. 8. 9. 10. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-138065; GF-2025-144692 907 East 13th Street 15 – 1 Proposal Demolish a house constructed between circa 1873 and 1884. Architecture One-story center passage National Folk Style building with horizontal wood siding, a partial width front porch supported by turned posts, a side-gabled roof clad with standing seam metal, and double hung wood windows. While the front door has been replaced, the trim and transom above the window remain. Research The house at 907 E 13th St, originally addressed as 907 E Peach St, was built between 1873 in 1885 by Julius H. Nitschke. Nitschke and his family immigrated from Saxony, Germany in 1855. He and his four brothers owned and operated Nitschke Brothers Cabinetmakers on Congress Ave. Nitschke married Louisa Phillips in 1871. He worked as a carpenter, cabinet maker, and carpet layer until his death in 1910. His son, J.H. Nitschke Jr., also worked as a carpenter and dabbled in car repair and railroad work before becoming a career fireman. He sold 907 E 13th St. to the Goins family between 1912 and 1920. Anna Liza Goins, formerly of Manor, lived in the home until her death in 1956. She worked as a cook and as a laundress while also renting out rooms. Her children and their spouses lived with her intermittently throughout the early 20th century. After her death, her daughter Roxy Tucker lived there until at least the 1960s. The home’s occupancy is emblematic of how the demographics of this East Austin neighborhood changed. European immigrant families, numerous at the turn of the century, gradually migrated elsewhere while African American families were forced to migrate eastwards during the era of segregation. However, all of the building’s occupants were working class people who innovated to support their families and to build communities in the face of inequality and segregation. Property Evaluation The 2016 East Austin survey lists the property as eligible for local landmark listing, individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places, contributing to a potential local historic district, and contributing to a potential National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. The original porch was modified during the period of significance; the provenance of the existing turned posts is unclear. The porch was rehabilitated and incompatible asbestos siding …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Applications for Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-131605; GF-2025-144708 601 North Bluff Dr 16 – 1 Proposal Demolish a circa 1946 house. Architecture One-story house clad in rustic stone veneer capped with a cross gabled roof with exposed rafter tails, a partial width porch, and a large stone chimney. Research The House at 601 N Bluff Dr was constructed around 1946. Its first occupants were the Haffelder family. Thomas B. Haffelder was a butcher who worked at the Bonugli grocery store in Austin for 30 years before opening his own barbecue restaurant, called The Shanty, on Red River Street. Haffelder and his wife, Elizabeth, lived at 601 N Bluff until his retirement in 1978. Property Evaluation Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Texas Vernacular architecture with ranch style influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, or deconstruction and salvage over demolition, but approve the demolition permit application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. Location Map 16 – 2 Property Information Photos 16 – 3 16 – 4 Occupancy History 1955 Thomas Benton and Elizabeth Haffelder, owners – butcher Demolition Permit Application, 2025 1952 Tommie and Elizabeth Haffelder, owners — Meat cutter, Bonugli’s Red and White Grocery Historical Information 16 – 5 Birth certificate of Tomas Haffelder, 1908 The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Austin, Tex.. 18 Feb 1944: 5. The Austin American (1914-1973); Austin, Tex.. 24 Aug 1947: A8. 16 – 6 Banister, Claire. The Austin American (1914-1973); Austin, Tex.. 08 May 1955: C4. The Austin American …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-137436 2611 Woodmont Avenue 17 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1940 building. Architecture Constructed with Tudor Revival elements and set back far from the street, the house at 2611 Woodmont Avenue evokes the appearance of an estate in West Austin. Design elements include a double chimney next to the main entry, several sequential gables facing the street underneath a steep cross gable running parallel to Woodmont Avenue, and several large metal windows on the front elevation. From the side facing Exposition Boulevard, a side driveway terminates at a non-historic carport. Given the site’s elevation, a lower level is visible from this side. The building appears to be in good condition and embodies the original form and style well. Research When the Tudor Revival house was completed in or slightly before 1940, the first owners were Leslie and Juanita Engelking, who lived there along with their daughter Doris, who was studying at the University of Texas. By 1944, the house had been sold to Howard and Eva Degler, the former of whom worked as a professor. By the late 1940s through at least 1959, the property passed to Richard & Violetta Weber, who raised their daughter Nancy at the address. Richard worked as a dentist after moving to Austin in the 1930s, and was employed at the Capital National Bank Building (now called the Norwood Tower) in downtown Austin. Property Evaluation Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Tudor Revival architecture in west Austin. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation …
Page 5 of 5 Page 4 of 5 Page 2 of 5 Page 3 of 5 Page 1 of 5 i4, a L;ci( isl r.rY I -,, I9;.1 L dlt r -l- l BA@' L 5a/ "36 € r!-.ra €=- lr.,a. LOT ll s B LOCK t5 ! : .i .l -:.r I I ,. I-o -t- ll. ti- I ..1 l I I (r. ,i r] 6 ,[} tfl lff l,{ ] i o I ,.) i. I i w il t ,l),a 2-,569 ,64{!,." qrA u,5o7 6t5 *,ozz9f dd&^t ,l ,.] t I '; r,I "J I c 5..6- qd sEr J -1" pi &R r. 1;. . F a- __I tr 59 '!' t, Lol Ar^ = l\c * 27160 20+.86+ 5"?A 2 !-3r o 7--t t/. 0 5 lat hcrro is a rruc, correcr, and accurate reprcsentation of Eha prop.rt.,. is rjoEer.ir.d rvc!, Lhe lines and diDenstons of said propcrrv bcinS .ns in<ti.ared bi, rh€ pI".: tir. srz.J i,,o, .nd ryDc ol building and inproven.nts are shown, all inprovciicats b.:ira (.iti.ir: t,r. 1ri..-s oi thc properrv, except as €hoern, set back from tt,.i prop.rr, !incs t5,: disr.o.!s :rce.l. ..-';).:,.,.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-141795 3006 Fruth Street 18 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1936 building. Architecture This single-story Craftsman bungalow features a large front porch that stretches across the right two-thirds of the front elevation. This wall also features two sets of paired hung wood windows that appear to be original or well-made replacements. A broad front gable covers the porch, with a side gable behind covering the main house at a moderate pitch. The original, narrow teardrop siding is present and is in good condition. Research Upon construction in the mid-1930s, the property was owned by Jeanie Prewitt, who was employed by the Texas State Highway Department. Throughout her ownership of 3006 Fruth Street, one or more renters are listed as living at the address. This continued after the house was sold to Kellie Parsons, who lived at the address with her husband as well as family members and a cycle of short term renters, the most common being students at the University of Texas. Shortly after their purchase of the property, Kellie Parsons and her husband, Jack Lovell Wilkerson, welcomed their first child, who was raised at the address. Property Evaluation The 2020 North Central Austin historic resource survey lists the property as a contributing resource to either a potential Fruth Street local or national historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Craftsman bungalow architecture. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. Staff Recommendation Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, relocation, or deconstruction and salvage over demolition, but approve the demolition permit …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION Demolition and Relocation Permits December 3, 2025 PR-2025-139336 812 Park Boulevard 19 – 1 Proposal Demolish a ca. 1937 building. Architecture This single-story, stone-clad house was constructed around 1937 but contains some design features that would become common to the ranch style commonly seen in many other parts of Austin. The low, horizontal form, with two separate front facing gables that bookend a long, low side gabled roof form, as well as the picture window alongside otherwise horizontally oriented fenestration, and the L-shaped plan would all become features of later developments, but here are combined with a white stone cladding and covered entryway that are more common to the older houses found on the rest of Park Boulevard. Decorative attic vents and two small, vertical windows on the front elevation appear to have embedded a slight Tudor Revival influence as well. Research The house was originally built for Ralph & Elizabeth Button of Button Ice Cream Company, which was developing into a larger organization after being founded some years before. However, this changed with the passing of Ralph Button in 1943, after which sole ownership passed to Elizabeth and after to Ralph Jr., who worked as a driver. Elton & Millo Marcum purchased the property after, and lived there for several years, adding on to the footprint in 1962. Property Evaluation The 2021 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek historic resource survey lists the property as a medium priority and eligible as a contributing resource to a potential Park Boulevard historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of an early ranch-inspired residence in this area of the city. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural …
0 20 40 SCALE: 1" = 20' TREE LEGEND CRITICAL ROOT ZONE = DIAMETER EQUAL IN FEET TO TWICE THE NUMBER OF INCHES OF THE TREE'S TRUNK DIAMETER (P) (H) PROTECTED TREE (DIAMETER > 19") HERITAGE TREE (DIAMETER > 24") Tag No. Type Trunk 3237 3238 PECAN ASH 27 1/2 " (H) 21 " (P) LOT 2 MARCUM ADDITION VOL 83, PG 101C P.R.T.C. LEGEND CALCULATED POINT "X" MARK SET ON TOP OF COLUMN 1/2" IRON PIPE FOUND (UNLESS NOTED) GAS VALVE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WASTE WATER MANHOLE WATER METER CLEAN OUT POWER POLE ELECTRIC METER COMMUNICATIONS JUNCTION BOX SIGN VAULT AIR CONDITIONING UNIT WOOD FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT OVERHEAD UTILITY PROPERTY LINE ADJOINER LINE EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE AREA STONE AREA TOPOGRAPHIC, TREE AND SAG SURVEY OF LOT 1 MARCUM ADDITION SUBDIVISION VOLUME 83, PAGE 101C PLAT RECORDS, TRAVIS COUNTY, TX G E WW W CO PP E C CALLED 1.4720 ACRE DOC. NO. 2024121751 O.P.R.T.C. // \\\\ OHU OHU OHU W C A L HIC C U H A M L A T E B E A E T D P R S: S A L F 2 7°3 OIN E N C T F 7'0 E P R O M S 6 2°0 (S 59°38' E) (77.1') 3" E 7 7'5 7.0 9' S T 2' O 7"W 0.6 #271390 T O O H U P P O H U N G: 6 5: 6 O L 6: 6 6 E: 6 6 2 5 3.3' 2.9' 2.7' 2.2' // PP 3.5' 1.0' OFF O H U 3.6' U H O U H O // U H O U H O // U H O U H O U H O U H O 9.8' 1 O O H H U U O H U // O H U O O H H U U O O H H U U 26.2' STONE GARAGE FFE:623.97' 26.2' O H U 3.3' // O O H H U U O H U O O H H U U O H U // O O H H U U 5' E.E. (PLAT) 9.8' 1 O H U OHU O H U S A O H U // OHU O N O H U H U G: 652.7 G: 624.1' 6 2 4 E.E. S.B.L. VOL. PG. P.R.T.C. ON/OFF R.O.W. ( ) OHU NG ELECTRIC EASEMENT SETBACK LINE VOLUME AND PAGE PLAT RECORDS …
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: patricia calhoun Monday, December 1, 2025 3:06 PM Historic Preservation Office patricia calhoun; Brenda Malik; Misael Ramos; Marilyn Poole 2406 E MLK, Jr. Blvd Demolition Protest Importance: High You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Good afternoon, Hunter, Thank you for returning my call today regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for 2406 E. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd.. I am a resident of the Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Historic District and I am in favor of a Postponement of this ruling pending plans or some type of document showing the use of this property. This property is adjacent to an original and well-known homeowner of this Historic District; I would strongly object to approval for demolition without site plans or other documentation showing that the structure is not suitable for rehab. Thank you, Patricia Calhoun, ASID, IIDA, RID Patricia Calhoun THE PERFECT ADDITION 972-814-6543 (Cell) CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov". 1
Sturgill, Hunter From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 1(713)6282228 <ctmavayaalerts@austintexas.gov> Tuesday, December 2, 2025 8:19 AM Historic Preservation Office [Transcribed] Voice Message From: 1 (713) 6282228 VoiceMsg[ID=1414728 G=40 F=228 A=588B9018-E3E0-4915-B196-27EE696E9546 C=1 CID= 1(713)6282228].wav Hello, my name is Marilyn Webb. I'm a neighbor of case number 20. G F 202-514-4858. The 2406 East Mar(cid:415)n Luther King junior Boulevard. I object to this applica(cid:415)on. The builder or whoever owns the property has has never discussed the cer(cid:415)ficate of appropriateness of a demoli(cid:415)on at this contribu(cid:415)ng property. I would like to see any alterna(cid:415)ves to pull demoli(cid:415)on. As it is a contribu(cid:415)ng property. Please give me a call, I'm going to make an a(cid:425)empt to file this objec(cid:415)on. Thank you. Yes. 1
