Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for December 14, 2022 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Amber Allen at (512) 974-3393. Historic landmark and historic district applications 115 E. 5th Street – Heierman Building – Addition/remodel (Postponed November 2, 2022) 606 E. 3rd Street/1005 Lydia Street – Robertson-Stuart Mair Local Historic District – relocation of home into historic district (Postponed November 2, 2022) 1606 Niles Road – Pease Mansion – Addition/remodel (Postponed November 2, 2022) 706 Oakland Avenue – Webster House – Addition/remodel (Postponed November 2, 2022) 200 E. 43rd Street – Hyde Park Local Historic District – pool 1300 E. 4th Street – Texaco Depot – signage 613 Blanco Street – Castle Hill Local Historic District – Addition/remodel National Register district permit applications 512 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register District – Demolish a contributing house and build new construction (postponed November 2, 2022) 1315 & 1317 Newning Avenue - Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register District – Demolish a contributing building and build new construction (postponed November 2, 2022) 1020 Spence Street – Willow-Spence National Register District – Partially demolish a contributing building with addition/remodel 409 E. Monroe Street – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register District – Demolish a contributing house and build new construction 1804 Brackenridge Street – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register District – Demolish a contributing house and build new construction 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 3007 Oakmont Boulevard – Old West Austin National Register District (noncontributing) – New construction 2816 Glenview Avenue – Old West Austin National Register District – Demolish a contributing house and build new construction 16. 515 Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register District – signage Demolition and relocation permit applications (all total demolitions unless otherwise noted) 1800 Guadalupe Street (postponed November 2, 2022) 608 E. 3rd Street (postponed November 2, 2022) 2717 Manor Road 801 A-B …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, December 14, 2022 – 6:00 PM CITY HALL - Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Amber Allen at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Terri Myers, Chair Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair Anissa Castillo Witt Featherston Kevin Koch Carl Larosche Harmony Grogan Trey McWhorter Blake Tollett Beth Valenzuela Caroline Wright AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. November 2, 2022 – Offered for consent approval 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 2. HR-2022-122453 – 115 E. 5th St. – Applicant-Requested Postponement Heierman House Council District 9 Proposal: Addition/demolition/alteration (Postponed November 2, 2022) Applicant: Richard Garrod City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1801 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s postponement request to January 11, 2023. 3. HR-2022-096727 – 606 E. 3rd St./1005 Lydia St. – Applicant-Requested Postponement Robertson-Stuart Mair Local Historic District Council District 1 Proposal: Relocation of home into historic district (Postponed November 2, 2022) Applicant: Douglas Manchester City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1801 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s postponement request to January 11, 2023. 4. HR-2022-138071 – 1606 Niles Rd. – Consent Pease Mansion Council District 10 Proposal: Addition/remodel (Postponed November 2, 2022) Applicant: Emily Little; John Hallock City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Concur with Committee feedback and Texas Historical Committee recommendations and approve the application. The application has been amended to reflect feedback. 5. HR-2022-155777 – 706 Oakland Ave. – Applicant-Requested Postponement Webster House Council District 9 Proposal: Addition/remodel (Postponed November 2, 2022) Applicant: Emily Kettlewell City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1801 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s postponement request to January 11, 2023. 6. HR-2022-163130 – 200 E. 43rd St. …
13 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-165753 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK 1804 BRACKENRIDGE STREET PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1920 house and construct a new residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story flat-roofed house clad in stucco, brick, and board and batten siding. The proposed house has a partial width inset porch and irregular fenestration pattern. Construct a pool. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One and one half-story Craftsman bungalow. The house located at 1804 Brackenridge Street was constructed around 1920. Its first owners were John and Elmeda Heath. John Heath worked as a traveling salesman. By 1925, the house had become a rental property; early occupants included another salesman, a radio technician, and a printing company employee. After a brief vacancy, the Dilworth and family moved into the house during the 1940s as renters. They worked at Galloway’s Sandwich Shop and shared the rental with Mary Sanchez, another Galloway’s employee. By the 1950s, the Dilworths had purchased the home. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building appears to be appropriately sited and set back. 2. Orientation The proposed building’s orientation is consistent with the design standards. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale and height appears to be appropriate when compared to the surrounding one- and two-story houses. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions somewhat reflect those of the surrounding district. Its design and style are less compatible. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roof does not reflect the character of the district. 7. Exterior walls The proposed cladding somewhat compatible with the district, though solid stucco rather than panels and horizontal siding rather than vertical would be more appropriate. 8. Windows and doors Proposed fenestration is not compatible with the district. Summary The project meets some applicable standards. 13 – 2 PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain a high degree of integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. …
R 29'(CRZ) R 18'-6"(1/2 CRZ) R 9'-11/2"(1/4 CRZ) R 1'-61/2"(LIVE OAK 2) R 1'(LIVE OAK 4) R 6'(1/4 CRZ) R 12'(1/2 CRZ) R 24'(CRZ) A006 2 140.11' P R O P E R T Y L INE 5 FT S E T B A C K EA S EMENT 32 S.F ENCROACHMENT OF STRUCTURE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY E N I L Y T R E P O R P 4 6 0 0 A ' 8 3 . 6 4 WM K C A B T E S T F 5 2 EX IS T ING PATIO A ND W A L K TO BE D E M O L IS HE D K L A W E D I S GM BM: 576.02' E G D I R N E K C A R B EX IS T ING GA R A GE T O BE D E M O L IS HE D EX IS T ING W A LK TO BE D E M O L IS HE D O.H. LINE TO BE RELO BURRIED CATED/ V ISIT A BL E R OUT E EX IS T ING S ING L E ST OR Y R E S ID E NC E T O BE D E M O L IS HE D 5 FT SET BA CK 57 8 P R OP ER T Y L INE 57 9 5 8 0 581 5 8 2 EM 140.09' 3 A006 R 101/2"(LIVE OAK 3) R 5'-3"(1/4 CRZ) R 10'-6"(1/2 CRZ) R 21'(CRZ) R 2'(LIVE OAK 1) R 12'(1/4 CRZ) R 24'(1/2 CRZ) R 46'(CRZ) A007 1 A007 1 Y E L L A 6 0 0 A 5 ' 9 5 3 4 . N E N I L Y T R E P O R P 576 CO K C A B T E S T F 0 1 57 7 N EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" ID A001 A002 A003 A004 A005 A006 A007 A008 A009 A010 A011 A012 A013 A014 A015 ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS Name EXISTING SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS TREE PROTECTION PLAN TREE PROTECTION PLAN SUB CHAPTER F EXHIBITS AE OH LINE EXHIBITS SPECIFICATIONS AND SCHEDULES ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION PLAN FLOOR PLANS FLOOR PLANS ELECTRICAL PLANS ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS S E W E R L INE W A T ER SUPPL Y L INE GA S …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-165753 OLD WEST AUSTIN 3007 OAKMONT BOULEVARD 14 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1955 house and construct a new residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story stucco and stone house with a metal roof. 3007 Oakmont is a one-story Ranch house with enclosed carport. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS The house located at 3007 Oakmont Boulevard was constructed in 1955. Early residents were Allen Jackson, a student, and renters Don and Betty Payne. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building appears to be appropriately sited and set back. 2. Orientation The proposed building’s orientation is consistent with the design standards. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale and height appears to be appropriate when compared to the surrounding one and two-story houses. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions, design, and style reflect those of the surrounding district. 6. Roofs The proposed roof is compatible with the district. 7. Exterior walls The proposed stucco and stone are compatible with the district. 8. Windows and doors Proposed fenestrations are compatible with the district. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. 14 – 2 PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain a moderate to low degree of integrity. Windows have been replaced and the carport was enclosed in 1986 to install a bay window, per permit history. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is constructed in the Ranch style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The …
3007 Oakmont Blvd. REVISED SUBMITTAL FOR 12/14/22 HLC REVIEW Margaret & Chris Burns, Owners | Paul DeGroot, Architect 1 Neighborhood PHOTOS OF NEIGHBORING HOMES EXISTING HOME AT 3007 OAKMONT 2 NEIGHBOR TO LEFT AND EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING HOUSE (TO BE DEMOLISHED) EXISTING HOUSE AND NEIGHBOR TO RIGHT NEIGHBOR TO THE RIGHT 3 Plans & Elevations SITE PLAN & BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN FIRST & SECOND FLOOR PLANS ELEVATIONS ROOF PLAN & REAR PORCH DETAIL 4 5 6 7 8 Materials ELEVATION STUCCO, STONE & ROOF MATERIALS 9 PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATION PROPOSED STUCCO COLOR PROPOSED STONE BASE PROPOSED ROOF COLOR 10 Thank You. 11
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-168526 OLD WEST AUSTIN 2816 GLENVIEW AVENUE 15 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1937 house and construct a new residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new building is a one-story house with Tudor Revival influences, including arched entryway, exposed rafter tails, and catslide roof. It is clad in brick at the façade and horizontal siding at the sides and rear, as is the existing house. Fenestration includes a paneled front door, 4:1 mulled and single sash and 4-light casement windows of aluminum-clad wood, and a paneled garage door at the rear elevation. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH 2816 Glenview Avenue is a one-story cross-gabled house with masonry and horizontal wood cladding. It has shallow eaves, an asymmetrical plan, and 6:6 screened windows with decorative shutters. The house at 2816 Glenview Avenue appears to have been built by noted Austin firm Page and Southerland around 1937, as building and tap permits list both architects as the property owners. It was first a rental property for the Avery family until it was sold to Greenwood and Nina Wooten in the early ‘40s. Greenwood Wooten was a drugstore owner and pharmacist; he and Nina Belle Wooten’s later dwelling at 1405 Wooldridge Drive has been listed as a City of Austin Landmark.1 The Wootens alternately lived in and rented the house until around 1955, when it was purchased by James and Maxine Burch. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new building appears appropriately sited on the lot. 2. Orientation The proposed new building is oriented in the same way as the existing historic-age building. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed new building’s scale, massing, and height appear appropriate for the district. 4. Proportions The proposed new building’s proportions are compatible with the surrounding district. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s Tudor Revival-influenced design does not reflect the dominant Colonial Revival influences in Bryker Woods; however, it is an appropriate stylistic reference for the Old West Austin National Register District as a whole and does reflect the era in which its neighbors were constructed. It is differentiated by its modern fenestration patterns and …
Terkel Residence 2816 Glenview Ave Austin, TX 78703 ARCHITECT: Norma Yancey, AIA SIDETRACKED STUDIO, PLLC 1605 E. 7th Unit B Austin, Texas 78702 phone: 512.774.4261 norma@sidetracked-studio.com Colleen Terkel 2816 Glenview Ave Austin, TX 78703 LEGAL DESCRIPTION N CEN 59 X 129.9 FT OF TRT B BRYKER WOODS ZONING INFORMATION SF-3-NP Zoning Ordinances: 20100923-10 OWNER INFORMATION INDEX OF DRAWINGS G1.0 A0.0 A0.1 A1.0 A1.1 A2.0 A2.1 A2.2 COVER SHEET SITE PLAN - EXISTING & DEMO SITE PLAN - PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SQUARE FOOTAGE LOT SIZE 7,680 SF EXIST. FLOOR TO AREA RATIO: EXEMPT TOTAL 2592 SF/ 7680 SF = 33.75% < 40% FAR ALLOWED BY CODE IMPERVIOUS COVER: EXIST. TOTAL FIRST FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: SECOND FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: THIRD FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: AREA W/ CEILINGS >15FT: GROUND FLOOR PORCH: BASEMENT: ATTIC: GARAGE: CARPORT: ACCESSORY BUILDINGS: TOTAL: FIRST FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: SECOND FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: THIRD FLOOR CONDITIONED SPACE: BASEMENT: ATTACHED COVERED PARKING: DETACHED COVERED PARKING: COVERED WOOD DECKS (100%): COVERED PATIO: COVERED PORCH: BALCONY: OTHER: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE: DRIVEWAY: SIDEWALKS & STEPS: UNCOVERED PATIO: UNCOVERED WOOD DECKS (50%): AC PADS & CONC FLATWORK: OTHER: SUB-TOTAL: TOTAL: NEW 2,450 - - - 184 - - 342 - - 2976 NEW 2450 - - - 342 - - - 184 - - 2976 2976 313 94 62 - 9 - 478 3454 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 - - - 184 - - 200 - - 384 2450 - - - 0 - - 142 - - 2592 2450 - - - 342 - - - 184 - - 2976 2976 313 94 62 - 9 - 478 3454 3454 SF/ 7680 SF = 44.97% < 45% IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE ALLOWED BY CODE 1 FRONT VIEW Sidetracked Studio 1806 Holly St. Austin, Texas 78702 870 219 6942 11.03.22 FIELD INSPECTION REQUIRED Prior to performing any bidding, new construction, and/or repairs, general contractor shall visit the site, inspect all existing conditions, and report any discrepancies to the architect. e c n e d s e R i l e k r e T i e v A w e v n e G 6 1 8 2 l 3 0 7 8 7 X T …
16 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A HISTORIC DISTRICT SIGN PERMIT DECEMBER 14, 2022 SB-2022-156600 CONGRESS AVENUE NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT 515 CONGRESS AVENUE PROPOSAL Replace existing signage on a noncontributing building. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS Standards for signs in National Register districts include: The proposed project installs two internally lit flush-mounted signs, each measuring 60” X 350”, near the top of the tower. Number of signs. The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. Sign types. The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. The proposed signage will replace existing signage. Sign size The proposed signage is 60” X 350”; however, the Commission granted and exception and approved the existing signage project in 2014, which also exceeds the allowable sign size. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials. Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces are not allowed. Limit the colors used in a sign to no more than three. For sites with multiple signs, all signs should have corresponding or matching designs, coloring and materials. The proposed signage is simple in design and meets applicable standards. Lettering. No more than two typefaces are allowed. Avoid lettering which appears too contemporary in the sign. The proposed sign includes one typeface. Lighting. Internally-lit cabinet signs are not allowed for signs on historic buildings or within the historic districts. The proposed signage is internally lit and does not meet this standard. However, it replaces existing internally lit signage approved in 2014. Sign Placement The proposed signage will be located at the top of the tower and will not impact the district. Sign Mounting There will be no damage to historic-age buildings. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. PROPERTY INFORMATION 16 – 2 Existing signage Proposed signage
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS DECEMBER 14, 2022 GF-2022-138179 1800 GUADALUPE STREET 28 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a ca. 1923 apartment building and detached garage. Three-story Colonial Revival-Federalist Style building composed of painted brick on the central portion of the building, wood siding on the side additions, and stucco on the front and rear porch overhangs. Hip-gabled metal seam roof with two chimneys, five dormers on the front of the building, four dormers on the rear, and a single dormer on each side of the building above small rooftop decks. 6:6 wood windows throughout except for 4, 12:12 windows on the front of the building, and a classic Palladian window with a simple masonry arch over the main entry with fanlight and sidelight. The building located at 1800 Guadalupe St was constructed as an apartment building sometime around 1923. The apartments were referred to as the Carmen Apartments from 1924-1959, per city directory research. Sisters Alice and Eunice Carman, daughters of Robert Clarke and Alice Carman, built the apartments for an estimated $18,000, according to a 1923 article. Alice Carman lived in and owned the building from 1952 until her death in 1962. It is remarkable that the property was built by two women in 1923. It was just shortly earlier in 1900 that every state had passed legislation granting married women the right to keep their own wages and to own property in their own name. The legal right of women to own and manage property is equal to men today, but full financial autonomy for women didn’t come about until late in the 20th century. It wasn’t until the mid-1970s that a woman could access a line of credit independently without a man to cosign her application. Ten years later, the courts ruled that a husband doesn’t have the right to unilaterally take out a second mortgage on property held jointly with his wife. Despite legal protections for property rights, women still struggle against a real estate gender gap. Research points out that women spend an average of two percent more than men to purchase a home and get two percent less return on their investment when reselling, a significant obstacle to economic parity that has yet to be overcome, and such inequalities may help explain part of the overall gender gap in wealth accumulation.1 Despite such inequalities, the Carman sisters built 1800 Guadalupe …
1800 Guadalupe Street Historic Landmark Commission – Item 17 December 14, 2022 1 Site Aerial 2 Site Aerial 3 • 0.3254 acres • Building footprint: approx. 3,391 square feet; total floor area: approx. 10,173 square Property Details Size: feet Current Use: • Administrative/Professional Office Zoning: • DMU – Downtown Mixed Use 4 Designation Criteria: LDC §25-2-352(A): The council may designate a structure or site as a historic landmark (H) combining district if: 1. The property is at least 50 years old and represents a period of significance of at least 50 years ago, unless the property is of exceptional importance as defined by National Register Bulletin 22, National Park Service (1996); 2. The property retains a high degree of integrity, as defined by the National Register of Historic Places, that clearly conveys its historical significance and does not include an addition or alteration which has significantly compromised its integrity; and 3. The property a. b. Architecture Is individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places; or is designated as a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, State Archeological Landmark, or National Historic Landmark; or demonstrates significance in at least two of the following categories: i. ii. Historical Associations iii. Archeology iv. Community Value Landscape Feature v. 5 Designation Criteria: Point-By-Point • Age – Over 50 Years Old. • Staff Report: The building is more than 50 years old. • Our Research: We agree that the original structure is more than 50 years old. 6 Designation Criteria: Point-By-Point • Structure Appears to Retain High Integrity. • Staff Report: The structure appears to retain high integrity. • Our Research: We respectfully disagree – the exterior façade on all four sides of the structure has been altered significantly in numerous ways since it was originally constructed in 1923. 7 Structure Alteration History 1923 After 1935 1979 1980s/2003 1984 1984-5 Original two-story Carman Apartments built with flat roof Front porch expanded, west addition constructed Building renovated to add air conditioning Approx. 60% of windows replaced or added Third floor addition built with new dormer windows, chimneys and roof Building remodeled from apartments to office 8 Structure – Current Context 9 Structure – Current Context 10 Historic Aerial Imagery – 1955 From UT Tower 11 Building Alterations 1984 – 3rd Floor Addition 1985 – Exterior and Interior Remodel 12 Building Alterations Alterations Key: Red = Replacement (1984) Blue = Replacement (Unknown date) Black= Original 13 Architectural …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS DECEMBER 14, 2022 PR-2022-161192; GF-2022-169708 2717 MANOR ROAD 19 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1946 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION 2717 Manor Road is a one-story house clad in cut stone and horizontal wood siding. It has a cross-gabled roof, exposed rafter tails at deep eaves, and 6:6 windows. The house at 2717 Manor Road was built in 1946 for George A. and Nell Byrne. George A. Byrne worked as an auditor at the IRS, and the couple had three children while they lived in the house. In the late 1950s, the Byrnes sold the property to Robert Barnes. The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The buildings are more than 50 years old. 2) The buildings appear to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The property does not appear to display architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, but release the demolition permits upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 19 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 19 – 3 19 – 4 19 – 5 Zillow.com, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, November 2022 1959 1955 1952 1949 Robert E. Barnes, owner George A. and Nell Byrne, owners Auditor at the Internal Revenue George A. and Nell Byrne, owners Auditor and collector Internal Revenue George A. and Nell T. Byrne, owners Debt collector Historical information The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Austin, Tex. [Austin, Tex]. 09 Mar 1946: 5 Birth Notice 1 -- No Title. The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); 05 Nov 1947: 7. Birth Notice 1 -- No Title. The Austin Statesman …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS DECEMBER 14, 2022 PR-2022-163800 801 A & B/801-803 W. JOHANNA STREET 20 – 1 Demolish a ca. 1936 house and a ca. 1947 house. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story symmetrical cottage with side-gabled roof, steeply pitched gabled portico with triangular brackets and decorative bargeboard, and The house at 801 W. Johanna St. was built in 1936 by Mae Fleming, who later married Winston L. Tipton. Winston was a salesman at various local grocers and Mae worked as a stenographer. By the 1950s, Winston Tipton managed the Blue Bonnet Stamp Company. They rented a portion of their house and later constructed 803 W. Johanna St., also addressed as 801-B W. Johanna St. Renters were mostly short-term and included salespeople, an insurance agent, and an optician. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2016 Bouldin Creek Neighborhood survey lists the property as a medium priority and contributing to a potential historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The buildings are more than 50 years old. 2) The buildings appear to retain high to moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The main building is a good example of a vernacular cottage with Craftsman influences. The secondary building does not appear architecturally significant. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the demolition permits upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP 20 – 2 20 – 3 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 20 – 4 20 – 5 20 – 6 Google Street View, 2022 Occupancy History City Directory Research, November 2022 1959 801 W. Johanna St. Winston L. and Mae K. Tipton, owners Manager, Blue Bonnet Stamp Company Incorporated 803 W. Johanna St. Henry G. Jedwiga, renter ½ …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS DECEMBER 14, 2022 PR-2022-164691 2003 CANTERBURY STREET 21 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1912 house. ARCHITECTURE One-story National Folk house with pyramidal hipped roof, board-and-batten siding, and inset partial-width porch supported by turned posts. Fenestration includes double entry doors and 1:1 replacement windows. RESEARCH The house at 2003 Canterbury was constructed in 1912 by Zena and Lillie Howell. Zena Howell worked as a teamster for the City of Austin. The Howells sold the home in 1921 to Mary R. Shooter, who lived close by at 2000 Garden Street with her son and two adult daughters.1 She then rented the home to various short-term, working-class renters, including drivers, a mechanic, and a barber. After Mary Shooter’s death, ownership of the home passed to her son. Carl. From 1959 through 1960, it was the temporary home of Mexican American neighborhood activists Edward and Concepción Rendon.2,3 PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2016 East Austin survey lists the property as contributing to potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. Windows have been replaced. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of vernacular National Folk architecture.4 b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant associations other than brief occupancy by community activists Edward and Concepción Rendon. However, its residents exemplify the overall development patterns of the South East Austin area during the twentieth century, including gradual demographic shifts from homeowners to renters and from working-class Anglo and European American families to Mexican American families. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not appear to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the Commission determines that the building has sufficient historical associations to meet the required designation criteria, initiate historic zoning. Otherwise, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS DECEMBER 14, 2022 PR-2022-169534 2203 EAST CESAR CHAVEZ STREET 22 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1912 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story pyramidal hipped-roof house clad in horizontal wood siding, with partial-width inset porch supported by boxed columns, a central chimney, and exposed rafter tails at eaves. The house at 2203 E. Cesar Chavez Street, alternately addressed as 2203 E. 1st Street, was constructed around 1912 by carpenter W. Burt Haston. Haston and his family lived in the house until around 1920, when it was rented to a roofer and his wife. It was briefly owned by Amos Franklin, who worked as a teamster, before being sold to the Kuehn family around the mid-1920s. Paul Kuehn worked as a carpenter, while Emily Kuehn was active in the Lutheran church. Their children Albert, Hildegard, and Hertha also lived in the family home; Hertha was a nurse while Hildegard was a dental technician. Hildegard eventually married contractor Alvin Massey and the couple lived on the property with her parents in the 1950s. Son Herbert Kuehn, dean of the Methodist Theological Seminary in Singapore, visited his parents often. The Kuehn family owned and occupied the home until Emily Kuehn’s death in 1969. PROPERTY EVALUATION The 2016 East Austin survey recommends the property as eligible for local landmark designation, individually eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and as a contributing structure in potential local and National Register historic districts. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. Windows and doors have been replaced. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends that the building meets two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of a vernacular building constructed with Craftsman and National Folk stylistic influences. b. Historical association. The East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the property as eligible for its associations with the widespread development patterns of East Austin.1 The initial builders and long-term residents of the home exemplify the demographic of middle- and working-class residents of the East Cesar Chavez neighborhood during the twentieth century. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property has not …
8 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-138071; C14H-2002-0011 WOODLAWN 1606 NILES ROAD PROPOSAL Rehabilitate historic structure. Remove existing addition. Construct two new additions and three new outbuildings. Restore pathways and gates. Relocate pool and replace tennis court. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Preserve existing historic elements of 1854 and 1903 building campaigns, including repair and restoration, while retaining historic lawns per 2002 Texas Historical Commission easement requirements. Rehabilitation plan includes: • Restore and refinish original 1854 front door and surround. • Replace missing shutters to match historic photo. • Restore wood porch detailing and expose brick piers below columns, per historic photo. • Remove non-original trim above original door head trim. • Replace rotten wood at balcony. • Restore existing pendant lanterns at front porch. • East porch: remove rotten framing & decking. Remove fiberglass coating at column base plinth and repair limestone base. Repair rotten wood at columns. Replace herringbone masonry pattern at walk per historic photos. • South porch: remove brick steps surrounding porch, trapping water. Remove paint from column base and repair limestone base. Replace wood decking. Replace herringbone masonry pattern at walk per historic photos. • Replace rotten wood and plywood at entablature. • Remove existing gutters and downspout. Restore original scuppers and provide new built-in gutters. • Repair original windows where possible. Replacements, when required, will be custom-fabricated long leaf pine, single glazed windows, with profiles to match detailing of original windows. • Stabilize and waterproof existing foundation. • Repair damaged, settling brick, stabilizing and repointing as needed. Repaint where needed. Repair broken limestone sills, patching when possible. Sill replacement, where necessary, will match existing material, design, texture, and finish. • Stabilize existing brick and decomposed granite driveway with stone edging and low curb.Clean and restore concrete eagles atop limestone posts at service drive on Niles Road. Clean and restore limestone pillars, low walls, and Woodlawn plaque at main vehicular gate at southeast corner. Re-use historic star and bracing at existing main pedestrian gate in proposed new gate at Pease Road. • Restore hitching posts, decorative lanterns, and lampposts. 2) Remove 2003 west addition and construct a new two-story stepped addition in its place. The proposed addition is set back 1’ from historic material with an articulated connection point. It will be clad in 2”x20” off-white Roman-style brick laid in a random pattern. Its roofline will be below …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-163130 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 200 EAST 43RD STREET 6 – 1 PROPOSAL Install a pool in the front-side yard of a contributing house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install a new prefabricated pool with required enclosure in east side yard. DESIGN STANDARDS The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. However, the Hyde Park design standards do not specifically address site features; thus, the property may also be evaluated under the more general Citywide Historic Design Standards, which are used to evaluate projects in historic districts. The following standards may be used to evaluate the proposed project: Hyde Park Design Standards 1.2: Retention of Historic Style: Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project does not affect the existing building; however, the historic-age streetscape may be affected by the installation of the pool and/or fence at the building’s primary street frontage. 5.12: Fences: Design fences with materials that are compatible with the architectural character of the structure. Fences shall adhere to the regulations set forth in the Hyde Park Neighborhood Conservation Combining District (Ordinance No. 020131-20): 5. A fence located in a front yard may not exceed a height of four feet and shall have a ratio of open space to solid material of not less than 1 to 1.5. 6. This section applies to a fence located in a street side yard that faces an avenue and is greater than four feet in height. The portion of a fence that is greater than four feet shall have a ratio of open space to solid material of not less than 1 to 1.5. 7. A fence located along an alley shall have an inset to accommodate a trash receptacle. The inset shall be a minimum 18 square feet. Proposed fencing materials and dimensions were not provided for review. Citywide Historic Design Standards: Sites and Streetscapes 1.1 Do not grade, fill, or excavate unless it is to solve a drainage or flooding problem. The proposed project excavates to install a prefabricated pool. 1.2 Retain permanent landscape features that define the character of the property and the district. Protect them when constructing new buildings or additions. The proposed project does not appear to destroy a prominent feature; however, it may disrupt the rhythm …
TREES: T1 Pecan T2 Pecan 25.5" diameter 23" diameter property line + fence GENERAL NOTES: These drawings are for information only, they shall not be scaled from. All dimensions shall be checked on site. Any discrepancies in the drawings shall be brought to the attention of the designer. Any variations from these drawings shall be approved by the designer. WALL LEGEND: Existing wall: Proposed wall: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W 75ft Lot 12-16 Blk 16 Hyde Park Addn No 1, City of Austin, County of Travis PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER: Lot Area: 9,375t2 Max Allowable Building Coverage @ 40%: 3,750ft2 Max Allowable Total Impervious Coverage @ 45%: 4,218ft2 Building Coverage: House: 1,591ft2 Covered Porch: 152ft2 Cottage: 605ft2 Cottage Porch: 112ft2 Total Building Coverage: 2,460ft2 26% lot coverage Impervious Coverage: Walkway + Steps: 238ft2 Planter: 22ft2 Cottage Planter: 9ft2 Pool Coping: 34ft2 Total Impervious Coverage: 303ft2 3.2% lot coverage Total Building + Impervious Coverage: 2,763ft2 / 29.5% FRONT YARD IMPERVIOUS COVER: Front Yard Area: 1,875ft2 Max Allowable Coverage @ 40%: 750ft2 Impervious Coverage: Front Porch: 152ft2 Walkway + Steps: 158ft2 House: 33ft2 Total Impervious Coverage: 343ft2 18.3% front yard coverage TREE LEGEND: Tree trunk Critical Root Zone 1/2 Critical Root Zone 1/4 Critical Root Zone Protective fencing Protective mulch SITE NOTES: All work to conform to the City of Austin standards for tree preservation. 1. No cut & fill greater than 4" within the 1/2 CRZ of any protected tree. 2. A minimum of 50% of the CRZ of a protected tree will be preserved at natural grade, with natural ground cover. 3. All protected trees within the construction area to be protected by minimum 5' high chain link fencing around the CRZ. Any area of the CRZ that is not fenced to allow for reasonable working space will be covered with 8" layer of mulch to City of Austin standards. 4. There will be no impact to the existing tree canopies by the construction. No pruning will be required. 5. Excavation construction route to avoid 1/2 CRZ of each protected tree on the lot. 6. Erosion control barriers to be installed prior to commencement of construction 7. Builder to resculpture topo/finished grade to provide proper drainage of surface water away from building as required 8. All construction materials and waste to be stored on site during construction 9. Contractor shall clean up areas affected by daily work and remove debris and materials from …
TREES: T1 Pecan T2 Pecan 25.5" diameter 23" diameter property line + fence GENERAL NOTES: These drawings are for information only, they shall not be scaled from. All dimensions shall be checked on site. Any discrepancies in the drawings shall be brought to the attention of the designer. Any variations from these drawings shall be approved by the designer. WALL LEGEND: Existing wall: Proposed wall: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W 75ft Lot 12-16 Blk 16 Hyde Park Addn No 1, City of Austin, County of Travis EXISTING IMPERVIOUS COVER: Lot Area: 9,375t2 Max Allowable Building Coverage @ 40%: 3,750ft2 Max Allowable Total Impervious Coverage @ 45%: 4,218ft2 Building Coverage: House: 1,591ft2 Covered Porch: 152ft2 Cottage: 605ft2 Cottage Porch: 112ft2 Total Building Coverage: 2,460ft2 26% lot coverage Impervious Coverage: Walkway + Steps: 238ft2 Planter: 22ft2 Cottage Planter: 9ft2 Total Impervious Coverage: 269ft2 2.9% lot coverage Total Building + Impervious Coverage: 2,729ft2 / 29.1% FRONT YARD IMPERVIOUS COVER: Front Yard Area: 1,875ft2 Max Allowable Coverage @ 40%: 750ft2 Impervious Coverage: Front Porch: 152ft2 Walkway + Steps: 158ft2 House: 33ft2 Total Impervious Coverage: 343ft2 18.3% front yard coverage 15' building setback line 4303 ave f R 6' 4.5" 1/4 C R Z T1 R12' 9" 1/2CRZ R25' 6"CRZ existing gas meter ave f 200 e43rd st T2 " R Z R 5 ' 9 C 1 / 4 R11' 6" 1/2CRZ R23' 0"CRZ e 43rd st power pole incoming power line property line + fence fence existing electric meter 5' building setback line 25' building setback line property line + fence SCALE: N t f 0 t f 5 t f 0 1 t f 0 2 t f 0 3 www.edwardroaddesign.com Revision Project 200 E 43rd St Drawing Existing Site Plan Scale Date 1/16" = 1' @ 11 x 17 October 03, 2022 Drawing No. 001
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-169818 TEXACO DEPOT 1300 EAST 4TH STREET 7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install 5 signs at the new portion of the building. Install one sign at the primary streetscape on the gate to the historic building. Restore existing historic-age signs. 1) Install a 10 ft2 face-lit sign at the top of each elevation on the new tower. 2) Install a 6 ft2 backlit steel sign at the rear entrance of the building, oriented toward the paseo. 3) Install a 9 ft2 indirectly lit steel sign on the front gate of the property. DESIGN STANDARDS Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The proposed signage plan includes one sign at each entrance and four around the top of the new tower. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off-premises, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. The proposed signage plan does not include prohibited sign types. Sign Size: The maximum size for signs depends on the sign type: 2. Flush-mounted signs: 7% of the overall façade area, with a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet . Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. The proposed flush-mounted signs are each within the 20 ft2 limit; however, cumulative signage is approximately 55 ft2. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials: Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DECEMBER 14, 2022 HR-2022-170074 CASTLE HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT 613 BLANCO STREET 8 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an addition, carport, pool, and deck to a contributing house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Partially demolish rear and rear-side of existing residence to construct a three-story rear addition to a one-story house, removing side and rear-side windows. The proposed addition is set back beyond the existing roof ridgeline. Cladding includes bleached cedar siding at roof and exterior. The addition’s proposed roofline is irregular, with steeply pitched, flat, and shed forms. Windows are fixed, undivided, and placed irregularly throughout. The proposed addition includes a front- facing shed-roofed dormer with fixed and sliding windows of varying proportions. 2) Add new sash window at north second-floor gable end. 3) Construct a cantilevered carport at south elevation, with fascia to match siding. 4) Construct a pool and deck in backyard. ARCHITECTURE 613 Blanco Street is a one-story side-gabled Craftsman house, with a center partial-width gabled porch supported by boxed columns atop brick piers, exposed rafter tails and decorative brackets at eaves, and horizontal wood siding. DESIGN STANDARDS A.1. General District Requirements The Castle Hill Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: (a) Repair, rather than replace, original materials. Replace only materials that are deteriorated beyond repair or that detract from and are not original to the building. Replacement materials shall match the original materials when feasible. The proposed project removes some original windows at side elevations. (d) Single Family or Single Family Use: The allowable height for additions and new construction is the average height of the adjacent properties on either side of the subject property or 32’, whichever is greater. The proposed addition has a finished floor elevation of 26’. Adjacent property and overall height measurements were not provided. C.1. Required Standards for Rehabilitation or Alteration of Contributing Buildings (a) Maintain the historic style and retain character-defining features. (c) Repair existing original windows unless determined infeasible due to excessive deterioration that is adequately documented in the application for a certificate of appropriateness. Utilize recommended repair practices listed below where feasible. The proposed project appears to retain character-defining features at the main elevation, with window replacement and addition at secondary elevations. D.1. Required Standards for Additions to Existing Buildings (a) For contributing buildings, a new addition shall not …
LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B LOW POINT -1'-8 3/8" N 67°43'09'' W 101.22' (F.M.) N 65°30'00'' W 101.22' (PLAT) 5' BLDG. SETBACK EXISTING BRICK PATIO 482 PROPERTY LINE LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A LOW POINT -2'-9 3/8" 480 PL PL ELECTRIC POLE T E E R T S O C N A L B E T E R C N O C K L A W E D I S ) T A L P ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ) . M . F ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ' ' ' 0 0 4 5 ° 9 2 N ' ' ' 1 5 0 4 ° 7 2 N E N I L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 1 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 EXISTING SHED A/C PAD 5' BLDG. SETBACK 482 PROPERTY LINE LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B HIGH POINT -2'-5 5/8" S 65°29'00'' E 101.46' (PLAT) S 67°42'09'' E 101.46' (F.M.) 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A HIGH POINT -3'-5" PL 488 PL 486 484 LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C HIGH POINT +1'-8 3/8" VARIES" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION A) LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C LOW POINT 0'-3 3/4" PL PL 484 FROM FNC. POST N 80°53'37'' W 0.56' K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ) . M . F ( ' 8 2 . 1 5 W ' ' ' 3 0 7 5 ° 7 2 S 486 488 . m . p 2 1 : 2 1 | 2 2 0 2 e d e r b m e v o n e d 6 1 , s e o c r é m l i i | # # # # . r e V | 7 1 8 0 2 2 _ C N L B / m a e …
LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B LOW POINT -1'-8 3/8" N 67°43'09'' W 101.22' (F.M.) N 65°30'00'' W 101.22' (PLAT) 4'-1 1/2" 5' BLDG. SETBACK 482 PROPERTY LINE LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A LOW POINT -2'-9 3/8" 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C LOW POINT 0'-3 3/4" FROM FNC. POST N 80°53'37'' W 0.56' PL PL 484 " 4 / 3 1 - ' 8 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ) . M . F ( ' 8 2 . 1 5 W ' ' ' 3 0 7 5 ° 7 2 S 486 488 7'-0" 33'-4" 3'-6" 4'-0" 22'-10" " 4 / 1 2 - ' 6 10'-7 1/2" " 0 1 - ' 0 1 2 3 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 4 P U N D EXIST. 1 -STORY WOOD FRAME SIDING HOUSE NEW SECOND AND THIRD STORY ADDITION 100'-0" F.F.E. FIRST LEVEL ELECTRIC POLE T E E R T S O C N A L B E T E R C N O C K L A W E D S I ) T A L P ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ) . M F. ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ' ' ' ' ' 0 0 4 5 ° 9 2 N ' 1 5 0 4 ° 7 2 N E N I L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 1 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 PL 488 PL 486 484 LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C HIGH POINT +1'-8 3/8" VARIES" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION A) 5' BLDG. SETBACK GATE GATE 482 PROPERTY LINE SERVICE YARD LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B HIGH POINT -2'-5 5/8" S 65°29'00'' E 101.46' (PLAT) S 67°42'09'' E 101.46' (F.M.) 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A HIGH POINT -3'-5" M P 6 3 : …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Eric John Matthies Friday, December 9, 2022 1:28 PM HPD Preservation Case #GF 22-169711 Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged . Learn why this is important at [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Hello I am writing about the landmark commission application meeting for the property at 801 W. Johanna St While the public commission meeting is scheduled for the 14th it would appear that some demolition has already begun in the front yard area. Further, the back gate has been left disabled and open, as is the back door of the property. As close neighbors to the property we have concerns about this landmark craftsman being demolished, and the apparent haste with which the demo company and or the new property owners are treating the house and land prior to the hearing. Leaving the home accessible while obviously vacant is a concern for our neighborhood which already sees an increase in theft and burglary. Beginning to announce the demolition, and in fact appearing to have begun the work prior to a proper hearing is in the least, disrespectful of the neighborhood and neighbors. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Eric Matthies ‐ The universe is ceaselessly creative. ‐ CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
August 22, 2022 Queenie Chan DTSalazar Inc. Via email to Queenie@dtsalazar.com Re: Project review under a preservation easement, Woodlawn Mansion (Pease Mansion) Fundamental Exterior Scope, 6 Niles Road, Austin, Travis County, Texas (Preservation Easement, RTHL, NRHP) Ms. Chan, Thank you for your correspondence regarding the above-referenced project. This letter serves as comment from the Executive Director of the Texas Historical Commission (THC), holder of the preservation easement placed on the property in perpetuity in 2002 by the grantor, the State Preservation Board to the grantee, the Texas Historical Commission (State Historic Preservation Office). The THC Division of Architecture staff, led by Alex Toprac, has completed its review of the project proposal and provided fundamental exterior schematic plans, renderings, and photographs, which were submitted on July 14th, 2022. Our staff acknowledges the exterior scope of work notably includes: Exterior Masonry Rehabilitation- • Brick masonry cleaning and repointing with a matching mortar mix and joint profile wherever determined necessary based on an assessment of existing conditions • Repainting of the brick exterior with a similar off-white color as the existing paint • Removal of paint from all sills and lintels to determine whether any natural stone will be repainted or left exposed with selective application of a breathable water-based silane water repellent coating with a matte finish • Removal of all existing caulking and coatings on the limestone column bases and wood columns, including 19th century red and green paint Exterior Carpentry Rehabilitation- priming, and repainting New Mechanical Systems- • Repair and selective replacement of deteriorated areas of wood entablature and soffit • Carpentry repair and selective replacement of areas of deteriorated wood columns before prepping, • Installation of new HVAC systems and ductwork to be installed in the attic, basement and/or crawlspace Roof Replacement- • Roof replacement to replicate the existing single roof design, with all earlier roof structures beneath to remain preserved in-place • Reconstruction of the previously altered rear, west elevation second story roof eave and cornice line to replicate the historic 1903 condition behind the proposed contemporary roof of the new west addition, which will be stepped down in height to reveal the reconstructed eave and cornice line Installation of new gutters and downspouts, potentially with a replicated historic scupper design • New Additions, Basement, and Utility Bunker Construction- • Removal of the 2003 rear, west addition, and construction of a new west addition with a shade trellis …
20 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS NOVEMBER 2, 2022 HR-2022-152879 WILLOW-SPENCE 1020 SPENCE STREET PROPOSAL Partially demolish and construct an addition to the rear side of a ca. 1912 contributing building. Construct a garage apartment at rear of lot. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a rear addition two-story addition to the existing one-story house. The addition is connected to the main house by a glass hyphen. It is clad in stack bond brick, stucco, and vertical wood siding. The roofline is mostly flat and clad in TPO, save for a small section of standing-seam metal shed roofing. Fenestration is mostly fixed, undivided, and vertically oriented. 2) Construct a two-story detached garage apartment with alley access at the rear of the lot. Proposed finishes and roofline appear to match the new addition. 3) Replace siding, windows, and roof and move the front door at the main house. Construct an accessible ramp and handrail to the front porch. The proposed window and door replacements modify original openings and window configurations. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story National Folk house with pyramidal hipped roof, board-and-batten siding, and inset partial-width porch supported by turned posts. Fenestration includes double entry doors and 1:1 wood windows. The 1985 Willow-Spence National Register Historic District nomination describes the house as “a one-story, board-and-batten cottage with a hipped roof and corner porch. Many architectural details are intact, including a Victorian comer-porch column. New elements include a cement foundation, steps, and porch floor.”1 The house at 1020 Spence was constructed around 1912 as a rental property. Its architectural details share many similarities with “Hofheinz houses,” distinctive National Folk houses rented out in East Austin to working-class families during the early years of the twentieth century by Edmund and Oscar Hofheinz. From the East Austin Context Statement (East Austin Historic Resource Survey), Vol. 1, p. I-40: The first two decades of the 1900s were rampant with development throughout the East Austin survey area …residential construction in these new developments reflected evolving trends in domestic designs, as the eclectic tastes of the Victorian era waned and simpler styles and detailing became more widespread. Among the poor and working classes, new house types began to replace more traditional forms. The linear, one‐room‐deep plans that featured gabled roofs…gave way to a new generation of houses with deeper, more box‐like plans and often had hipped or pyramidal roofs with inset porches. The effect …
GENERAL NOTES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND "ALIGN" AS USED IN THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL MEAN TO ACCURATELY LOCATE ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE OWNER CONFIRMATIONS OF ORDERS, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND EACH SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE NEW UNLESS NOTED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO THE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL ALL MEP RELATED ITEMS SHOULD BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER AND MAY BE ADJUSTED CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATELY BRACING AND PROTECTING ALL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CERTIFY SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL REQUIRED OPENINGS FOR 1. REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES AND STANDARDS, HAVING JURISDICTION, INCLUDING APPLICABLE TEXAS LAW AND AMERICAN'S WITH DISABILITIES ACT. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONFLICTS CONCERNING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH CODES, ORDINANCES OR STANDARDS, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK IN QUESTION. ALL NECESSARY LICENSES, CERTIFICATES, TESTS, ETC. SHALL BE PROCURED AND PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. ALL NECESSARY PERMITS SHALL BE PROCURED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND PAID FOR BY OWNER. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CHECKING ALL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS FOR ACCURACY AND CONFIRMING THAT THE WORK IS BUILDABLE AS SHOWN AND MEETS ALL APPLICABLE CODES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. IF THERE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE OR OTHER COORDINATION ISSUES, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A CLARIFICATION FROM THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK IN QUESTION OR RELATED WORK. 3. STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING WORK AND EQUIPMENT WITH TRADES INVOLVED. 4. FOR CHECKING EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE JOB SITE BEFORE SUBMITTING PROPOSALS. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS SHALL BE TAKEN AS EVIDENCE THAT SUCH INSPECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. CLAIMS FOR EXTRA COMPENSATION FOR WORK THAT COULD HAVE BEEN FORESEEN BY SUCH INSPECTION, WHETHER SHOWN ON CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR NOT, SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED OR PAID. 5. OTHERWISE. ALL WORK SHALL BE GUARANTEED AGAINST DEFECTIVE MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OR ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE WHEN ORDERED TO DO SO. ALL WORK THAT MAY DEVELOP DEFECTS IN MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP WITHIN THE ONE YEAR TIME PERIOD. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SERVICE INTENDED, AS INTERPRETED BY THE ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT. THE INSTALLATION OF …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bill W Monday, December 12, 2022 4:30 PM HPD Preservation Norma Yancey; 3216 Glenview HR-2022-168526 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Commissioners: The Historic Review Committee of the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association does NOT oppose this project. (By way of information, our Neighborhood Association only votes to “oppose” or “not oppose;” we do not “support.”).. We commend the architect for planning a new, single-story construction which will “fit in” with the style and look of our National Register neighborhood. We wish more architects were aware of our older Central Austin neighborhood when they begin their designs. Thank you for your consideration and support. Bill Woods Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Historic Review Committee Bill Woods Greg Underwood, President Joyce Basciano Linda Godinez CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
PMG : Digital Marketing Agency South Elevation v5 *Channel letters *LED lit *RGB color changing capabilities 60.0” 350.0” 14.0” 14.0” 14.0” **RENDERING REGISTERED FOR ESTIMATE PROPOSAL. DESIGN NOT TO BE REPLICATED AND OR CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL. Client Name: PMG : Digital Marketing Agency Mayfield Armstrong Location: 515 Congress Ave Austin, TX 78701 12/15/2021 12/12/2022 Start Date: Last Revision: Job#: 2675 Drawing#: Page: 1 of 1 PMG_v5 Client Approval • • Date COPYRIGHT 2020, BY YESCO • ALL DESIGNS PRESENTED ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF YESCO , AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM YESCO Sales Rep: Robb Pittman Designer: Rick Moore MEMBER INTERNATIONAL SIGN ASSOCIATION LISTED .
PMG : Digital Marketing Agency East Elevation v6 *Channel letters *LED lit *RGB color changing capabilities 60.0” 350.0” 14.0” 14.0” 14.0” **RENDERING REGISTERED FOR ESTIMATE PROPOSAL. DESIGN NOT TO BE REPLICATED AND OR CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT APPROVAL. Client Name: PMG : Digital Marketing Agency Mayfield Armstrong Location: 515 Congress Ave Austin, TX 78701 12/15/2021 12/12/2022 Start Date: Last Revision: Job#: 2675 Drawing#: Page: 1 of 1 PMG_v5 Client Approval • • Date COPYRIGHT 2020, BY YESCO • ALL DESIGNS PRESENTED ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY OF YESCO , AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN PART OR WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM YESCO Sales Rep: Robb Pittman Designer: Rick Moore MEMBER INTERNATIONAL SIGN ASSOCIATION LISTED .
Mold Assessment Summary Client Name Project Address Date of Inspection November 21, 2022 Scope Entire Structure Ilia Belov 2003 Canterbury Street ~ Austin, TX 78702 Summary of Findings and Lab Results My inspection revealed the following suspect conditions: • Visible mold-like growth • Elevated moisture content • Water damage or staining Samples were recommended according to the conditions observed and/or the reported complaints or concerns. Surface samples were collected from areas of visible mold-like growth, and laboratory analysis confirmed the presence of mold on the areas sampled as follows: • Crawlspace – Floor Truss • Primary Bedroom – Wall drywall • Kitchen – Ceiling Drywall Air samples were collected from the following areas, and laboratory analysis indicated the airborne mold spore concentration levels to be statistically elevated when compared to the outdoor air sample collected at the same time and place. Based on these results, there is a high likelihood that an indoor source of mold growth in the tested area is amplifying the indoor levels as follows: • Kitchen • Primary Bedroom • Primary Bathroom • Living Room Final Conclusion Based on the findings of the visual inspection and/or the lab results of the samples collected, mold remediation is needed. Corporate Office: (512) 535-2493 • 10403 Quail Ridge Dr., Austin, TX 78704 www.MoldInspectionTexas.com Recommendations 1. Engage Mold Inspection Sciences to write a Mold Remediation Protocol for the remediation project which is to include the following areas: • Living Room (<25 SF) • Kitchen (<25 SF) • Primary Bedroom (<25 SF) • Primary Bathroom (<25 SF) If less than (< 25 SF) 25 SF of visible mold growth was present, according to the Texas Mold Assessment and Remediation Rules (Rules), Exceptions and Exemptions, (b) Minimum area exemption, “A person is not required to be licensed under this subchapter to perform mold remediation in an area in which the mold contamination for the project affects a total surface area of less than 25 contiguous square feet.” In this case, a Licensed Mold Remediation Contractor is not required, but we strongly recommend hiring a licensed company. NOTICE: According to the Texas Mold and Remediation Rules (Rules): Regardless of the size of the area affected by mold contamination, if a licensed Mold Remediation Contractor is hired by the consumer, the Mold Remediation Contractor must follow the Rules. This includes developing a work plan which follows a protocol developed by a licensed Mold Assessment …
Document Number: TSE-2022-502094-STR-RPT-001-01 Nov 23, 2022, This letter summarizes the results of my structural and foundation assessment of a single-family home located at 2003 Canterbury St, Austin, TX 78702, inspected on Nov 18, 2022. TexasStructuralEngineers.com; Registration No.: F-21242. We Operate in 10 Largest Cities of Texas, Page 1 of 63 7505 Fannin St Suite 440 Houston TX 77054, (833) 781-7661, info@TexasStructuralEngineers.com The client hired Texas Structural Engineers to perform a structural inspection of the house based on the recommendation from the home inspector. Background Process Findings I inspected the house's interior and exterior walls, ceiling, roof framing (through the attic), and foundation, including the piers, beams, and floor sheathings. I also measured the maximum floor level differences using a laser level to investigate any foundation settlements in this house. The following are the findings from the structural inspection of the property: 1. The house is aged and worn. 2. There are several cracks in the house's ceilings and interior walls in multiple places (Figures 2 to 11). 3. There is visibly sagging on the ceiling drywall in the living room of the house (Figure 12). places (Figure 13). 4. There is visible damage and cracks on the floor of the house in multiple 5. There is visible rotten wood on the interior walls sheathings in multiple locations of the house (Figures 14 to 18). TexasStructuralEngineers.com; Registration No.: F-21242. We Operate in 10 Largest Cities of Texas, Page 2 of 63 7505 Fannin St Suite 440 Houston TX 77054, (833) 781-7661, info@TexasStructuralEngineers.com 6. The wall is not stable on the west side of the house and has movement. 7. The crawl space and floor have some leveling problems in this house. 8. The floor surfaces were walked and viewed for potential movement and deflection (Figure 16). 9. There are multiple piers that are missing a footing (Figures 40 to 50). 10. There are some different types of piers with different heights and sizes used in the house's foundation (Figures 40 to 50). 11. There are the most visible rotten floor beams and floor joists (Figures 40 to 50). 12. There are visible rotten and termite wood piers in multiple locations in the crawl space (Figures 31,32, 50,51). 13. There are about five piers that seem to be skewed and not fully vertical (Figure 31,34,40). 14. Visible rotten wood on the exterior walls sheathings on the east, west, and south side of …
2003 Canterbury Historic Land Commission Presentation Proximity to Historic Districts Proximity to Historic Districts Structural Report Excerpts There is visible rotten wood on the framing members of the wall on the east and west side of the house. Structural Report Excerpts There is water damage on the ceiling sheathings of the kitchen Structural Report Excerpts Visible rotten wood on the exterior walls sheathings on the east, west, and south side of the house Structural Report Excerpts There are visible rotten and termite wood piers in multiple locations in the crawl space Structural Report Excerpts There are the most visible rotten floor beams and floor joists Structural Report Excerpts There are visible damaged and rotted members of the roof frame in multiple locations in the attic The laser level reading of the floor shows a maximum level difference of 7 inches on a span of 23 feet. 1705 Haskell St Historic Designation Denial
LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B LOW POINT -1'-8 3/8" N 67°43'09'' W 101.22' (F.M.) N 65°30'00'' W 101.22' (PLAT) 4'-1 1/2" 5' BLDG. SETBACK 482 PROPERTY LINE LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A LOW POINT -2'-9 3/8" 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C LOW POINT 0'-3 3/4" FROM FNC. POST N 80°53'37'' W 0.56' PL PL 484 " 4 / 3 1 - ' 8 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 E N I L Y T R E P O R P ) . M . F ( ' 8 2 . 1 5 W ' ' ' 3 0 7 5 ° 7 2 S 486 488 7'-0" 33'-4" 3'-6" 4'-0" 22'-10" " 4 / 1 2 - ' 6 10'-7 1/2" " 0 1 - ' 0 1 2 3 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 4 P U N D EXIST. 1 -STORY WOOD FRAME SIDING HOUSE NEW SECOND AND THIRD STORY ADDITION 100'-0" F.F.E. FIRST LEVEL ELECTRIC POLE T E E R T S O C N A L B E T E R C N O C K L A W E D S I ) T A L P ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ) . M F. ( ' 9 2 . 1 5 E ' ' ' ' ' 0 0 4 5 ° 9 2 N ' 1 5 0 4 ° 7 2 N E N I L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 5 1 K C A B T E S . G D L B ' 0 2 PL 488 PL 486 484 LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 80' MARK SECTION C HIGH POINT +1'-8 3/8" VARIES" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION B) 40'-0" (TENT PORTION A) 5' BLDG. SETBACK GATE GATE 482 PROPERTY LINE SERVICE YARD LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 40' MARK SECTION B HIGH POINT -2'-5 5/8" S 65°29'00'' E 101.46' (PLAT) S 67°42'09'' E 101.46' (F.M.) 480 PL PL LINE FOR SUB-CHAPTER F TENT 0' MARK SECTION A HIGH POINT -3'-5" M P 6 3 : …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Monday, December 12, 2022 3:41 PM HPD Preservation Comment on Case HR-2022-170074 - 613 Blanco St. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To the Historic Preservation Office, attn: Amber Allen: Please register my opposition to the project planned for 613 Blanco St. (Case HR-2022- 170074). This project violates multiple deed restrictions (height, easement, etc.); requires removal of a large tree; is an inappropriate and incompatible addition that would be seen by multiple neighbors including me. Thanks for your consideration, Randall Brown CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, November 2, 2022 – 6:00 PM CITY HALL - Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. COMMISSION MEMBERS: x Terri Myers, Chair x Ben Heimsath, Vice Chair x Anissa Castillo x Witt Featherston x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Harmony Grogan x Trey McWhorter x Blake Tollett x Beth Valenzuela x Caroline Wright DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Meghan King gave an update for Preservation Austin. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 5, 2022 – Offered for consent approval MOTION: Approve the minutes, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. BRIEFINGS 2. Palm District plan Presenter: Mark Walters 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 3. C14H-2022-0139 – 2311 Woodlawn Blvd. – Discussion The Felts-Moss House Council District 10 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning Applicant: John Pieratt City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Recommend historic zoning. John Pieratt spoke in favor of the project. There were no speakers in opposition. MOTION: Close the public hearing, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconds the motion. Vote 11-0. MOTION: Recommend historic zoning, on a motion by Commissioner Grogan. Commissioner Castillo seconded the motion. Vote: 11-0. Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 4. HR-2022-119336 – 900 Blanco St./1202 W. 9th St./901 Shelley Ave. – Consent Castle Hill Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Addition/remodel (Postponed October 5, 2022) Applicant: Tyler Rush City Staff: Kimberly Collins, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-1801 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the plans with the following conditions: notes are added to the plans that the carriage house is moved under structural engineer supervision via lifting and rotating the structure, not deconstruction and rebuild; and if there is significant deterioration found resulting in the need for deviance from the approved plans that the case return to the Historic Landmark Commission for approval. MOTION: Approve the project in accordance with the staff recommendation, per passage of the consent agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Larosche. Commissioner Koch seconded the …
TO B E R E M OV E D PR O P O S E D CO N S T R U C T I O N T R E E S TO B E R E M OV E D T R E E S TO R E M A I N (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:24)(cid:28) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:25)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:23) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:20) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:23)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:21) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:21) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:22) (cid:10)(cid:22) O C (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:24)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:27) (cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:24) E M G (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:25)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:28) PARKING COURT P L BRICK WALL (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:24) (cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:22) O C (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:20) (cid:19) (cid:10) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:27) O C BASKETBALL COURT (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:23) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:10) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:24)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25)(cid:10) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:24) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:24) (cid:10) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) FOOTPATH (cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) POOL HOUSE POOL (cid:19)(cid:10) (cid:20) (cid:25) (cid:14) UTILIT Y SHED PL ANTER (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:26) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:27) TREE HOUSE (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:26)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:25) POOL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE / LOW WALL WELL HOUSE (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:28)(cid:26)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:26)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28)(cid:24)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:26) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:23) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:23) (cid:24)(cid:21)(cid:23) (cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:24)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:10) (cid:10) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:27) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:23)(cid:28)(cid:23)(cid:28) (cid:14) (cid:25) (cid:19) (cid:26)(cid:10) (cid:25) (cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:22)(cid:19) CURB CUT TO BE RELOCATED FO NOISNETXE WROUGHT IRON FENCE NORTHUMBERLAND RD NEW GATE NEW GATE (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:27) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:19) (cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:28)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:19)(cid:28) (cid:19)(cid:10) (cid:20) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:23) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:24) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:25) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:10) (cid:28)(cid:10) (cid:19) (cid:25) (cid:14) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:22) (cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:22) (cid:14)(cid:25)(cid:19)(cid:26)(cid:10) 364 3 264 464 460 TENNIS SSIISSSSSSSSS T NNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEETT NTTEEEEEETT NNNNNE TT TENNISNN SS TENNIS TENN SS TENNIS TENNISS TENNIS CCCCOOOOOOOOUUUUUUURRRRRTTRRTTTRTRTTTTT R CCCCCCOOOOOOOOUUUURRRRUUCCC CC COURTUU TT COURTUCCCOURT COCO COURT COURT COURT 474 R DN (4) R @ 6" DN DN (4) R @ 6" …
