Austin’s Creative Consortium Presented by Cory Baker, CEO Recognizing a Need • Now more than ever, the creative sector in Austin desperately needs a reliable support system with the resources and infrastructure to sustain itself, enabling growth to accommodate and better reflect the rapidly expanding population. • We believe that Austin is missing a critical piece to ensure a healthy creative sector – centralized support and services as called for in the Imagine Austin and Austin Music and Creative Ecosystem Omnibus Resolution: 23. Review the feasibility of existing efforts to partner or support the creation of a music “HUB” that supports the music industry by offering a collection of resources and services for musicians and artists under one roof. (Development a sustainable business model to support the musician and artistic community and the music and creative industry) Opportunity Emulate other organizations across the country that support the creative sector through creating efficiencies, raising revenue and awareness and cultivating collaboration Creative Consortium The Creative Consortium, a new initiative under the umbrella of The Long Center, would be an administrative hub offering services and generating resources for creative and cultural organizations. The Consortium will operate as an equitable and inclusive membership-based hub for the creative sector. Build Support and Revenue for the Creative Sector • Identify new funding to support the creative ecology in Austin that would be unavailable to individual organizations • Leverage scale and visibility of a multi-member consortium to successfully tap into corporate giving • Create a unified plan and voice to market the creative sector and build partnerships with key allies like the hospitality and tourism industries Increase efficiencies & Decrease costs through shared infrastructure • Consolidate and reduce overhead expenses freeing up time and resources for artist pursuits • Maximize savings through pooled purchasing • Provide a level of high caliber infrastructure and business services currently out of reach for many creative organizations, venues and artists Additional Benefits: • Opportunity to prioritize support for under-served and under- represented organizations • Cultivate collaboration and strengthen communication across the Creative Sector • Provide educational resources and best practice recommendations promoting Diversity, Equity & Inclusion • Elevate visibility of and advocacy for the creative sector Potential Consortium Structure • Membership organization with independent advisory board and by-laws • Commitment to intentional Equity and Inclusion • Long Center serves as administrative hub with centralized business unit and staff to manage services …
Hotel Occupancy Tax Update Sylnovia Holt Rabb, Deputy Director Economic Development Department November 15, 2021 C I T Y O F A U S T I N E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T 1 Hotel Occupancy Tax – October 2021 Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund Month Ended October 31, 2021 Approved Budget Amended Budget October w /Encumb Year-to-date w /Encumb Year-End Estimate Year-End Variance Fav(Unfav) Year-End % Variance Fav(Unfav) Tfr to Cultural Arts Fund 6,660,189 6,660,189 189,819 189,819 6,660,189 0 0.0% C I T Y O F A U S T I N E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T 2 Questions? C I T Y O F A U S T I N E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T 3
Selection Process Recommendation Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation AIPP Project Project Overview: Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation • Sponsor Department: Parks and Recreation • Estimated Project Completion: 2024 • District 8 • AAC approved Prospectus in May 2020 • Artist Selection: Pre-Qualified Artist Pool - Pandemic/Budget Delays - Pre-Qualified Local Artist Pool Availability - Community Member Artist Selection - Better Alignment with Architect/ Design Team - Leverage AIPP $ for true Project Integration Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation: Opportunity Budget: $104,000 and is all inclusive, including: • Artist's time; • Fabrication and installation, including engineering/permitting fees; • Travel and shipping expenses; • Insurance; and • Other project-related costs. Opportunity: Floor Artwork - Integrated Barton Springs Project Goals Importance Honors the importance of Barton Springs, including the historic Barton Springs Bathhouse; Environment Fosters stewardship of Barton Springs and the Edwards Aquifer; Historic Consistent with the historic context of the site, possibly illuminating the history experienced by African Americans Integration Conceptualizes a strong overall artwork design approach that integrates with the work of the bathhouse rehabilitation project; Maintenance Be easily maintained and vandal resistant; and Contribution Contributes to the depth/breadth of the City of Austin’s public art collection. Selection Team Voting Community Members: •Mike Cannatti*, Friends of Barton Springs Pool, Barton Springs Conservancy •Emily Little*, Architect, Barton Springs Conservancy, former AIPP Panel member • Mohammad Firoozi, longtime Barton Springs swimmer, artist/musician •Karen Kocher, Living Springs project creator, Barton Springs Conservancy •Courtney Moreau, Barton Springs recreator •Judith Sims, Austin Museum of Art, Barton Springs Conservancy Voting Project Advisors: •Ellen Colfax, PARD PM, Preservation Architect •Jessica Gilzow, PARD, Culture & Arts Program Manager •Sarah Carr, Art in Public Places Panel •Celina Zisman, District 8 Arts Commissioner Non-Voting Project Advisors: •Riley Triggs, Public Works PM •Jodi Jay, PARD Aquatics Manager •Al Godfrey, Architect AIPP Staff: Susan Lambe, Laura Odegaard, Maria Teresa Bonet, Alex Irrera *Mike Cannatti attended Meeting 1 (application review) and was replaced by Emily Little during Meeting 2 (interviews) Selection Process Summary 2020 May 4: Initial Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation AIPP Project Prospectus approved by AIPP Panel 2021 - Continued August 3: Artist Information Meeting May 18: Initial Prospectus is approved by Arts Commission 2021 February 1: Revised Prospectus approved by AIPP Panel March 15: Revised Prospectus approved by Arts Commission July 20: Request for Opt-In distributed to 164 visual artists and artist teams who live and work in Williamson, Travis, Bastrop, Caldwell, Hays, Burnet and …
To: City Council of Austin From: Urban Renewal Board Date: November 15, 2021 Subject: Land Use Regulations in the proposed Urban Renewal Plan and Neighborhood Conservation Combining Districts The Urban Renewal Board (URB) engaged in a multiyear effort to update the Urban Renewal Plan (URP) and the East 11th and 12th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining Districts (NCCDs). The Board’s recommendations were formed with the assistance of consultants, staff, and community input. The URB refined the list of neighborhood-oriented and pedestrian-friendly land uses in the URP and NCCDs to support active streets that serve the community. In response to concerns from stakeholders about the reduction of uses allowed for some properties: The Board supports proposed regulations which continue to allow uses that are permitted or conditional under current regulations if they support the goals of the URP. The URB intended through the “save and except” provision in the proposed URP and NCCDs that the uses listed by address, including existing single family houses, remain legal and are not subject to non- conforming regulations. In response to legal concerns about this section, City staff is recommending the creation of a new permitted use, “conforming”, that will be defined as a use that conformed to the regulations in effect at the time the use was established and existed on the date of adoption of the proposed ordinance. The Board supports the most appropriate mechanism to reduce the impact of non-conforming regulations on existing legal uses outlined in the “save and except” provision. This may include but is not limited to, inclusion of the “conforming” land use or other adjustments to the land use charts. The URB does not plan to hold any additional meetings to specifically discuss proposed land use regulations and will defer to Council regarding any changes as reflected above.
11th Street - Subdistrict 1 P = Permitted, PC = Permitted with Conditions, C = Conditional, — = Prohibited Use Conditions and Exceptions Existing Regulations* Proposed Regulations Residential Existing: no street level units Proposed: Not allowed on a ground floor of a building fronting E 11th Street Existing: 18 to 27 units per acre, no street level units Proposed: Not allowed on a ground floor of a building on E 11th Street Existing: no street level units Proposed: Type 2 Short-term rental is prohibited Proposed: Not allowed on a ground floor of a building Proposed: Not allowed on a Ground floor of a building on E 11th Street. Condominium Residential Group Residential Multifamily Residential Retirement Housing (Small Site) Townhouse Residential Short-Term Rental College & University Facilities Club or Lodge Community Recreation (Private) Community Recreation (Public) Communication Service Facilities Congregate Living Counseling Services Cultural Services Day Care Services (Commercial) Day Care Services (General) Day Care Services (Limited) Family Home Group Home Class I (General) Group Home Class I (Limited) Group Home Class II Guidance Services Hospital Services (Limited) Local Utility Services Community Parking Facilities Safety Services Private Primary Educational Services P — P — P — C P C C C — — P C C C — — — — P P P P P C PC C PC P — PC C — C C — C PC Civic P — C P P P P P P — P Not the LCD C C PC Proposed: Prohibited unless located on a rooftop Administrative and Business Offices PC Proposed: Not allowed on a ground floor of a building fronting E 11th Street Private Secondary Educational Services Public Primary Educational Services Public Secondary Educational Services Religious Assembly Safety Services Telecommunication Tower Arts and Crafts Studio (Limited) Arts and Crafts Studio (General) Art Gallery Art Workshop Automotive Rental Automotive Sales Automotive Washing Building Maintnence Services Business or Trade School Business Support Services Cocktail Lounge Commercial Off-Street Parking Communications Services Consumer Convenience Services Consumer Repair Services Financial Services Food Sales Funeral Services General Retail Sales (Convenience) General Retail Sales (General) Hotel-Motel Indoor Sports and Recreation Indoor Entertainment Laundry Services C C C P P — P P P — — C C C C C P C P P P P P P P P P P P P — Commercial Not the LCD Not the LCD P P — — — …
Zilker Eagle Mural Detail About Austin Parks Foundation About Austin Parks Foundation • For nearly 30 years, APF has partnered with our community to enhance people’s lives by making our public parks, trails and green spaces better through volunteerism, innovative programming, advocacy and financial support. • With a focus on creating equitable access to great parks for all Austinites, APF is helping fill the city's parks funding and resource gap. Funding initiatives like APF’s community-initiated grants have distributed over $3.5 million since 2006, and the annual flagship volunteer event, It’s My Park Day, results in an average of $650,000 in volunteer labor each year. • APF also fosters unique public/private partnerships like the Zilker Train and empowers neighbors all over the city to create a parks system that serves their needs. About Zilker Eagle About Zilker Eagle • Since 1961, a mini train has run in Zilker Park. The previous train, the Zilker Zephyr, went out of commission in May 2019. • Because of our partnership with the City’s Parks & Recreation Dept., and nearly 30 years of proven results, we were contacted to help find an interim solution while Zilker Park undergoes a vision planning process to build a new, long-term plan for the park. • We will operate the Zilker Eagle with proceeds benefiting parks across Austin, while the community has a chance to determine how the train fits into the new vision for the park and its future. Mural Selection Process Mural Selection Process • • Proposals were requested from April-May of 2021 and shared with artist collectives such as HOPE, SprayTX, and Raasin in the Sun, and with art and park partners as well as shared via APF's website, social media and a press release. • APF received about 20 proposals, and scored them based on our internal rubric which took into account the artists' identity (BIPOC, LGBTQIA+, gender, etc.) as well as the artists' past work and experience, and how well their proposal addressed the stated goals of the work - namely including community members of all backgrounds, bridging the gap between old and new Austin, and a demonstrated understanding of the audiences this piece should appeal to. • Once scored, the top 10 were then ranked by a broad swath of community members including APF board and staff, volunteers, park adopters, community partners, and Austin youth with a focus on bringing in the perspectives …
Joint Prospectus Colony Park Pool, Givens Park and Givens Pool Renovation Art in Public Places Projects (3) NOVEMBER 2021 Colony Park Pool Project Background Pool located S of the District Park Main public access from Loyola Lane AIPP project Peace and Harmony by Tyson Davis located at District Park Area developed in the 70’s and 80’s Austin’s history of red-lining in the Eastern crescent Community need for aquatics facility for many years Amenities include: lap lane pool zero-entry activity pool (tot pool) • • • water slide • • • • • spray ground feature diving board gender-neutral bathhouse + family restrooms deck space training/party room + aquatic office space District 1 Colony Park Pool Project Goals Community feedback for the goals and locations was gathered via virtual meeting on 1/27/21, 4/28/21, approved on 5/17/21. Artist Budget: $135,000 Creates a colorful, family friendly experience that draws inspiration from the facility and its surroundings; Respects and is inclusive of the diversity of the Colony Park community; Integrates nearby icons from nature, the schools and/or peace; Is easily maintained and vandal resistant in an exterior environment; Is unique in its contribution to the depth/breadth of the City of Austin’s public art collection; and Is accessible physically and conceptually by visitors of all ages to the park. Colony Park Pool Possible artwork locations 1. Central parking area 2. Near the entrance landscaped area 3. Exiting the bathhouse/training 4. Far edge of lap pool near the slide Final art location is to be determined by artist in collaboration with community and City stakeholders 4 Givens Park and Pool Project Background Pool located N of the District Park Main public access from E 12th Austin’s history of red-lining in the Eastern crescent Community needs updated aquatics facility (pool developed in 1958) Park Renovation Amenities include: lap lane pool zero-entry activity pool (tot pool) • • • water slide • • • • • spray ground feature diving board gender-neutral bathhouse + family restrooms deck space training/party room + aquatic office space AIPP Givens Pool Project Phase I: Forklift Danceworks Givens Swims Temporary public art by Cindy Elizabeth and Ernesto Hernandez District 1 Honors(cid:3031)the(cid:3031)history, heritage, culture, and stories of the Givens Park(cid:3031)community(cid:3031)(native(cid:3031)Black(cid:3031)and Eastside Austinites); Givens Park and Pool Projects Goals Celebrates the(cid:3031)diverse(cid:3031)and(cid:3031)vibrant(cid:3031)energy of(cid:3031)family(cid:3031)and(cid:3031)togetherness(cid:3031)at a(cid:3031)pool;(cid:3031) Community feedback for the goals and locations was gathered via virtual meeting on 1/26/21, 4/26/21 and revised/approved on 7/1/21. Pool AIPP Artist …
City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-01B Date: November 19, 2021 Subject: Design Commission recommendations for the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station, located at 4601 Westlake Drive. Bart Whatley Seconded By: Jessica Rollason Motioned By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station, located at 4601 Westlake Drive, as presented to us on November 15, 2021 meets the City’s design and sustainability standards. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station as presented to us. Our review found the following attributes: 1. Project is on track to achieve LEED Silver Certification, including on site solar. 2. Project is not subject to Subchapter E Design Standards. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Jen Weaver, Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao-Robledo, David Carroll, Josue Meiners, Bart Whatley, Jessica 8 - 0 - 0 Rollason, Aan Coleman Against: NA Abstain: NA Absent: Samuel Franco, Ben Luckens Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission Melissa Henao-Robledo, David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01B Davenport Fire Station Page 1
David Carroll, Chair Street. Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge E. Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-01C Date: November 19, 2021 Subject: Design Commission recommendations for the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station, located at 401 East 5th Seconded By: Bart Whatley Motioned By: Melissa Henao-Robledo Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the City of Austin Central EMS/Fire Station, located at 401 East 5th Street, as presented to us on November 15, 2021 meets the City’s design and sustainability standards. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the City of Austin Central EMS/Fire Station as presented to us. Our review found the following attributes: 1. Protects and restores existing historic structure. 2. Addition is clearly differentiated from existing structure 3. 4. Meets LEED requirements for sustainability 5. Inclusion of public artwork. Increases gender diversity and accessibility within the building Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Jen Weaver, Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao-Robledo, David Carroll, Josue Meiners, Bart Whatley, Jessica 7 - 0 - 0 Rollason Against: NA Abstain: NA Recused: Aan Coleman Absent: Samuel Franco, Ben Luckens Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01C Central EMS/Fire Station Page 1
David Carroll, Chair Riverside Drive. Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-01D Date: November 19, 2021 Subject: Design Commission recommendations for the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station 22, located at 5309 East Jessica Rollason Seconded By: Evan Taniguchi Motioned By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station 22, located at 5309 East Riverside Drive, as presented to us on November 15, 2021 meets the City’s design and sustainability standards. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the City of Austin EMS/Fire Station 22 as presented to us. Our review found the following attributes: 1. Project is on track for LEED Silver Certification. 2. Public entry is clearly articulated and accessible. 3. Project preserves existing grove of trees along Riverside Drive. 4. Accommodations are gender-neutral. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Jen Weaver, Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao-Robledo, David Carroll, Josue Meiners, Bart Whatley, Jessica 7 - 0 - 0 Rollason Against: NA Abstain: NA Recused: Aan Coleman Absent: Samuel Franco, Ben Luckens Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01D Riverside Fire Station
David Carroll, Chair Street. Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-01E Date: November 22, 2021 Subject: Design Commission recommendations for the City of Austin Fire Station 03, located at 201 West 30th Bart Whatley Seconded By: Jessica Rollason Motioned By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the City of Austin Fire Station 03, located at 201 West 30th Street, as presented to us on November 15, 2021 meets the City’s design and sustainability standards. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the City of Austin Fire Station 03 as presented to us. Our review found the following attributes: 1. New addition respects the historic building design 2. Project is following LEED green building criteria 3. Project preserves relationship to the street 4. Will finally allow the fire trucks to be parked inside apparatus bays, protection valuable city infrastructure. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Jen Weaver, Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao-Robledo, David Carroll, Josue Meiners, Bart Whatley, Jessica 7 - 0 - 0 Rollason Against: NA Abstain: NA Recused: Aan Coleman Absent: Samuel Franco, Ben Luckens Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01E 30th Street Fire Station Page 1
David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-1G Date: November 23, 2021 Subject: Design Commission recommendation for the Zilker Metro Park- Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation project, located at 2100 Barton Springs Road. Vice-Chair Rollason Seconded By: Commissioner Meiners Motioned By: Recommendation: The Austin Design Commission recommends that the proposed rehabilitation to the Barton Springs Bathhouse, as presented to us on November 15, 2021, comply with the City’s Design and Sustainability Standards. Rationale: Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s support of the Barton Springs Bathhouse as presented to us. Our review found the following attributes: Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: David Carroll, Aan Coleman, Jessica Rollason, Jen Weaver, Melissa Henao-Robledo, Josue Meiners, Bart 8 - 0 - 0 Whatley, Evan Taniguchi Against: n/a Abstain: n/a Absent: Ben Lukens, Samuel Franco Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01G Barton Springs BathHouse Rehabiliatation Project Melissa Henao-Robledo, 1. Proposed work protects historic structure 2. Existing heritage trees are to be preserved. 3. Project designed to meet green building standards 4. Project will restore original entry procession at rotunda.
David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-1H Jessica Rollason Seconded By: Evan Taniguchi Design Commission recommendation for the project located at 204-208 East 4th Street. Date: November 23, 2021 Subject: Motioned By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the project located at 204-208 East 4th Street, as presented to us on November 15, 2021, substantially complies with the City of Austin Urban Design Guidelines. Rationale: Dear Director of Housing and Planning Department, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s recommendation that the project located at 204-208 East 4th Street, substantially complies with the Urban Design Guidelines as one of the gatekeeper requirements of the Downtown Density Bonus Program. Our review found the following positive attributes: 1. Project proposes a small lobby, allowing for ample ground floor retail on all 4 sides, including alley. This will help reinforce pedestrian activity in this area. 2. Project provides a street level paseo enhances connectivity through the block. 3. Utilities and back of house are located in basement, thereby mitigating potential conflicts with pedestrians 4. Proposed mezzanine level retail further enhances street activity 5. Project provides additional seating and landscape along 4th Street which serves to enhance the streetscape. Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Aan Coleman, Josue Meiners, Bart Whatley, Jessica Rollason, David Carroll, Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao- 8 - 0 - 0 Robledo, Jen Weaver Against: NA Abstain: NA Absent: Ben Luckens, Samuel Franco Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01H 4th and Brazos
David Carroll, Chair Jessica Rollason, Vice Chair Melissa Henao-Robledo, Aan Coleman Samuel Franco Ben Luckens Josue Meiners Evan Taniguchi Jen Weaver Bart Whatley Jorge Rousselin, Executive Liaison Aaron D. Jenkins Staff Liaison Art Zamorano Staff Liaison City of Austin Design Commission DESIGN COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20211115-1I Design Commission recommendation for the project located at 415 Colorado Street. Date: November 24, 2021 Subject: Motioned By: Recommendation: The City of Austin Design Commission recommends that the project located at 415 Colorado Street, as presented to us on November 15, 2021, substantially complies with the City of Austin Urban Design Guidelines, with the agreement that the applicant adjusts the design to accommodate these additional recommendations: Jessica Rollason Seconded By: Aan Coleman 1. Extend proposed sidewalk paver pattern to incorporate outdoor food kiosk area for continuity. 2. Add seating options between the two column bays adjacent to outdoor food kiosk area for better connection and street activation. 3. Provide access to a public restroom. 4. Dedicate lobby area for coffee kiosk or similar service. Rationale: Dear Director of Housing and Planning Department, This letter is to confirm the Design Commission’s recommendation that the project located at 415 Colorado Street, substantially complies with the Urban Design Guidelines as one of the gatekeeper requirements of the Downtown Density Bonus Program, with the additional recommendations listed above. Our review found the following positive attributes: 1. Project proposes only one curb cut 2. Project provides covered outdoor seating at prominent corner. 3. Outdoor food service is provided. 4. 5. Covered arcade along Colorado side protects pedestrians Incorporation of public art 6 - 0 - 2 Respectfully, City of Austin Design Commission Vote: For: Aan Coleman, Bart Whatley, Jessica Rollason, Evan Taniguchi, Melissa Henao-Robledo, Jen Weaver Against: None Abstain: Josue Meiners, David Carroll Absent: Ben Luckens, Samuel Franco Attest: David Carroll, Chair of the Design Commission 1 of 1 Design Commission Recommendation 20211115-01I 415 Colorado
URBAN RENEWAL BOARD RECOMMENDATION 20211115-3a Seconded By: Watson Date: November 15, 2021 Subject: Land Use Regulations in the proposed Urban Renewal Plan and Neighborhood Conservation Combining Districts Motioned By: Escobar Recommendation See attached letter. Vote For: Escobar, Pierce, Skidmore, Motwani, Watson Against: None Abstain: None Absent: Tetey, Bradford Attest: Laura Keating 1 of 1 To: Mayor & City Council of Austin From: Urban Renewal Board Date: November 15, 2021 Subject: Land Use Regulations in the proposed Urban Renewal Plan and Neighborhood Conservation Combining Districts The Urban Renewal Board (URB) engaged in a multiyear effort to update the Urban Renewal Plan (URP) and the East 11th and 12th Street Neighborhood Conservation Combining Districts (NCCDs). The Board’s recommendations were formed with the assistance of consultants, city staff, and community input. The URB refined the list of neighborhood-oriented and pedestrian-friendly land uses in the URP and NCCDs to support active streets that serve the community. In response to concerns from stakeholders about the reduction of uses allowed for some properties: • The Board supports proposed regulations which continue to allow uses that are permitted or conditional under current regulations if they support the goals of the URP. The URB intended outcome through the “save and except” provision in the proposed URP and NCCDs was for the uses listed by address, including existing single-family houses, to remain legal and not to be subject to non-conforming regulations. In response to legal concerns about this section, City legal is recommending the creation of a new permitted use, “conforming”, that will be defined as a use that conformed to the regulations in effect at the time the use was established and existed on the date of adoption of the proposed ordinance. • The Board supports the most appropriate mechanism to reduce the impact of non-conforming regulations on existing legal uses outlined in the “save and except” provision. This may include but is not limited to, inclusion of the “conforming” land use or other adjustments to the land use charts. The URB does not see significant value in its holding additional meetings to specifically discuss proposed land use regulations and will defer to Council to identify the best practice strategies regarding the aforementioned changes. Further, the URB encourages Council to prioritize taking immediate action on changes recommended to the NCCD and URP documents. Additional delays will have a direct impact on the URB’s ability to move forward with …
