All documents

RSS feed for this page

Parks and Recreation BoardSept. 28, 2021

Approved Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD September 28, 2021 MINUTES The Parks and Recreation Board convened in a regular meeting on Tuesday, September 28, 2021 at 301 W. Second Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Lewis called the meeting to order at 6:06pm. Board Members in Attendance: Dawn Lewis, Richard DePalma, Nancy Barnard, Laura Cottam Sajbel, Sarah Faust, Nina Rinaldi and Kimberly Taylor. Board Members in Attendance Remotely: Anna Di Carlo and Lisa Hugman. Board Member Di Carlo joined the meeting at 6:48pm. Board Member Hugman departed the meeting at approximately 8:15pm. Staff in Attendance: Kimberly McNeeley, Liana Kallivoka, Lucas Massie, Suzanne Piper, Scott Grantham, Denisha Cox, Christina Bies, Gregory Montes, Grishma Shah, George Maldonado, Steven Prather, Jennifer Massie-Gore, David Hernandez, Ron Crane, Brent Bassett and Sammi Curless. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Kevin Reinis – Austin Rowing Club update. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes from the special called meeting of September 14, 2021 were approved on Board Member Taylor motion, Board Member Faust second on a vote of 7-0 with Board Member Rinaldi abstaining, Board Member Di Carlo absent and two vacancies. Due to potential time constraints and the number of interested speakers, Chair Lewis moved Item B4 to be heard as the first New Business item. B. NEW BUSINESS: PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS 1. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding a recommendation to the Planning Commission related to a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of wine and beer at the Zilker Cafe. Board Member Faust made a motion that the Parks and Recreation Board recommend to the Planning Commission that the Conditional Use Permit for the sale of wine and beer at Zilker Café be denied and further move that the recommendation applies to any other City Council or Board that considers the item; Chair Lewis seconded the motion. The Page 1 of 4 motion passed on an 8-1 vote with two vacancies. Those voting aye were: Chair Lewis, Vice Chair DePalma, Board Members Barnard, Cottam Sajbel, Di Carlo, Faust, Hugman and Taylor. Those voting nay were Board Member Rinaldi. 2. Presentation, discussion and possible action regarding a recommendation to the Director for approval of Temporary Use Work and Staging Area (7,204 sq. ft.), not to exceed 30 Calendar Days on parkland located at Lower Bull Creek Greenbelt (7806 N Capital of Texas Hwy). Total Mitigation Value is $2,251. Vice Chair DePalma made a motion to recommend to the …

Scraped at: Oct. 27, 2021, 2:50 p.m.
Planning CommissionSept. 28, 2021

PC 2021-09-28 minutes.pdf original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 6 pages

PLANNING COMMISSION September 28, 2021 MINUTES The Planning Commission convened in a meeting on September 28, 2021 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 301 W. 2nd Street, Austin, Texas and via videoconference @ http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Chair Shaw called the Commission Meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. Commission Members in Attendance: Awais Azhar Joao Paulo Connolly Yvette Flores Claire Hempel – Vice-Chair Patrick Howard Carmen Llanes Pulido Jennifer Mushtaler Robert Schneider Todd Shaw – Chair Jeffrey Thompson Solveij Rosa Praxis Arati Singh – Ex - Officio Jessica Cohen – Ex-Officio Richard Mendoza – Ex-Officio Absent: James Shieh Grayson Cox EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Planning Commission will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Commission may not conduct a closed meeting without the approval of the city attorney. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CITIZEN COMMUNICATIONS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of September 14, 2021. B. PUBLIC HEARINGS Plan Amendment: NPA-2021-0005.01 - ALPHA .95; District 3 2404 Thrasher Lane; Montopolis NP Area, Carson Creek Watershed Location: Owner/Applicant: Alpha Builders Group, Inc. (Gino Shvetz) Bennett Consulting (Rodney K. Bennett) Agent: Commercial to Higher Density Single Family land use Request: Staff Rec.: Recommended Maureen Meredith, 512-974-2695, Maureen.Meredith@austintexas.gov Staff: Motion to grant Neighborhood’s request for postponement of this item to October 12, 2021 was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Azhar, seconded by Commissioner Schneider on a vote of 10-0. Commissioner Praxis off the dais. Commissioners Cox and Shieh absent. 2. C14-2021-0128 - ALPHA .95; District 3 2404 Thrasher Lane; Montopolis NP Area, Carson Creek Watershed Rezoning: Location: Owner/Applicant: Alpha Builders Group, Inc. (Gino Shvetz) Bennett Consulting (Rodney K. Bennett) Agent: CS-NP to SF-6-NP Request: Staff Rec.: Recommended Kate Clark, 512-974-1237, kate.clark@austintexas.gov Staff: Motion to grant Neighborhood’s request for postponement of this item to October 12, 2021 was approved on the consent agenda on the motion by Commissioner Azhar, seconded by Commissioner Schneider on a vote of 10-0. Commissioner Praxis off the dais. Commissioners Cox and Shieh absent. 1. 4. 3. Rezoning: Location: C14-2021-0081 - 5th & Walsh Rezoning; District 9 1200, 1202, 1204, 1210, 1214, 1214 1/2 W. 5th St.; 504, 506 Walsh St.; Old West Austin NP Area, Lady Bird Lake Watershed Owner/Applicant: Anchor Equities, LTD (Jimmy Nassour); …

Scraped at: Jan. 3, 2022, 10 p.m.
Planning CommissionSept. 28, 2021

Sep 28, 2021 Planning Commission original link

Play video

Scraped at: Jan. 3, 2022, 10 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

Preview List original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for September 27, 2021 Meeting Meeting will be held in person at City Hall Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Public participation for this Public Hearing will be in-person only and no remote (by telephone) participation will be offered. To participate at this meeting, you must go to City Hall at 301 W. 2nd Street and attend in-person. Face coverings are required, regardless of vaccination status. For more information on the change in meeting format, please review the City of Austin’s statement here: https://austintexas.gov/news/person-public-meetings-are-back-following-expiry- governors-covid-19-exemptions This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Historic zoning applications A.1. A.2. 3004 Belmont Circle – Owner-initiated historic zoning 3703 Meadowbank Drive – Commission-initiated historic zoning Historic landmark and historic district applications B.1. 200 Lee Barton Drive – Paggi House – Replace existing butterfly roof and construct glass walls between the buildings to fully enclose the courtyard (postponed August 23, 2021) 1616 Northwood Road – McDonald-Doughtie House – Replace existing wood fence with stucco estate wall in backyard, construct new black iron fence in front yard, replace sidewalk, and create curb-cut landing at street 4208 Avenue F – Hyde Park Local Historic District – Construct side addition 608 Baylor Street – Taylor House – Construct a new two-story accessory structure National Register district permit applications C.1. 1805 Waterston Avenue – Clarksville National Register District – Demolish a contributing building and construct new building (postponed August 23, 2021) 2521 Jarratt Avenue – Old West Austin National Register District – Demolish a contributing house (postponed August 23, 2021) 1104 Toyath Street – Clarksville National Register District – Construct a new building (postponed August 23, 2021) 1104 Charlotte Street – Clarksville National Register District – Addition/remodel (postponed August 23, 2021) – Applicant-requested postponement to October 25, 2021 82 San Marcos Street – Willow Spence National Register District – Demolish a ca. 1941 B.2. B.3. B.4. C.2. C.3. C.4. C.5. 1 C.6. C.7. C.8. C.9. house. 1505 Travis Heights Boulevard – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register District – Addition/remodel 1412 Alameda Drive – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register District – Construct a two-story addition and replace windows and siding 2400 Pemberton Place – Old West Austin National Register District – Total demolition 2308 Woodlawn Boulevard – Old West Austin National …

Scraped at: Sept. 16, 2021, 11:50 p.m.
Municipal Civil Service CommissionSept. 27, 2021

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Monday, September 27, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. HRD Learning and Research Center 5202 E. Ben White Blvd, Suite 500 Austin, Texas 78744 AGENDA EXECUTIVE SESSION (No Public Discussion on These Items) The Commission will announce it will go into closed session pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel, or to discuss matters of litigation and personnel matters as specifically listed on this agenda. If necessary, the Commission will go into closed session, as permitted by law, regarding any item on this agenda. CALL TO ORDER CITIZENS COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. a. Approve the minutes from the Municipal Civil Service Commission regular meeting on 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES July 26, 2021. 2. HEARING a. Conduct a hearing on the appeal filed by Sacheen Yates regarding their Disciplinary Suspension from the Office of Police Oversight. b. Deliberate in open session or closed session, pursuant to 551.074 of the Texas Government Code (personnel exception), on the appeal filed by Sacheen Yates regarding their Disciplinary Suspension from the Office of Police Oversight. c. Possible action and decision on the appeal filed by Sacheen Yates regarding their Disciplinary Suspension from the Office of Police Oversight. a. Discussion and possible action regarding approval of the 2020 Commission Annual b. Discussion and possible action on scheduling meetings for calendar year 2022. 3. NEW BUSINESS Review. 4. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion of the Municipal Civil Service Commission recommendation to City Council (Recommendation 20191108-04B) regarding the review of granted denial of promotion and discharge appeals. b. Discussion and review of the Municipal Civil Service Rules to provide input to the Municipal Civil Service Director. c. Discussion and possible action on future meeting dates, times, and locations. 5. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Matthew Chustz of the Human Resources Department, at 512-974-2859, for additional information; TTY users …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 2:10 p.m.
Municipal Civil Service CommissionSept. 27, 2021

Backup Item 1a - 20210726 Draft MCSC Minutes original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, July 26, 2021 REGULAR MEETING Monday, July 26, 2021 MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES The Municipal Civil Service Commission convened in a regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, July 26, 2021 via videoconferencing. Vice-Chair Rogers called the Commission meeting to order at 9:08 a.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Melissa Rogers, Vice-Chair McKenzie Frazier Andy Mormon Kevin Mullen Commissioners Absent: Teresa Peréz-Wiseley, Chair Staff in Attendance: Matthew Chustz, Municipal Civil Service Administrator April Shaw, Municipal Civil Service Coordinator Jennifer Stanko, Municipal Civil Service Coordinator Omar Francia, HRIS Support 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 28, 2021. a. Approve the minutes from the Municipal Civil Service Commission regular meeting on The minutes of the June 28, 2021 regular meeting were approved on Commissioner Mullen’s motion, Commissioner Mormon’s second, on a vote of 4-0. 2. HEARING a. Conduct a hearing on the appeal filed by Don Miller regarding their Disciplinary Probation from the Austin Water Utility. A hearing was conducted on the appeal filed by Don Miller regarding their Disciplinary Probation from the Austin Water Utility. b. Deliberate in open or closed session, pursuant to 551.074 of the Texas Government Code (personnel exception), regarding the appeal of Don Miller regarding their Disciplinary Probation from the Austin Water Utility. 1 MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Monday, July 26, 2021 Vice-Chair Rogers recessed the Municipal Civil Service Commission meeting to go to closed session at 3:05 p.m. The Commission deliberated in closed session on the appeal filed by Don Miller regarding their Disciplinary Probation from the Austin Water Utility. Closed session ended and Vice-Chair Rogers called the Municipal Civil Service Commission meeting back to order at 3:33 p.m. c. Possible action and decision on the appeal filed by Don Miller regarding their Disciplinary Probation from the Austin Water Utility. The motion to deny Don Miller’s appeal and uphold the decision made by the City of Austin in the Disciplinary Probation of Don Miller was approved on Vice-Chair Rogers’ motion, Commissioner Frazier’s second, on a vote of 4-0. 3. OLD BUSINESS a. Discussion and possible action on the Municipal Civil Service Commission recommendation to City Council (Recommendation 20191108-04B) regarding the review of granted denial of promotion and discharge appeals. b. Discussion and review of the Municipal Civil Service Rules to provide input to the Discussion was held. Municipal Civil Service Director. Discussion was held. c. Discussion and possible action on future …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 2:10 p.m.
Municipal Civil Service CommissionSept. 27, 2021

Backup Item 3a - Letter to Council RE Recommendation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 8 pages

MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION August 10, 2020 Letter Regarding MCS Review Dear Mayor and Council: Sincerely, As you know, the Municipal Civil Service Commission sent a recommendation for council action dated November 8, 2019. We are not aware of any action that has been taken. Enclosed please find a copy of that letter and its attachments. Chair Pamela Lancaster Vice Chair Melissa Rogers Commissioner Rebecca Eisenbrey Commissioner Erika Kane Commissioner Teresa Peréz-Wiseley Teresa Peréz-Wiseley Pamela Lancaster MUNICIPAL CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 20191108-4B Date: November 8, 2019 Subject: Review and report of Municipal Civil Service Commission denial of promotion and discharge appeals. Motioned By: Pamela Lancaster, Chair Seconded By: Rebecca Eisenbrey, Commissioner Recommendation The Municipal Civil Service Commission recommends Council direct the appropriate City official to review granted denial of promotion and discharge appeals, gather data, and report the findings of the review back to the Commission. Description of Recommendation to Council The Commission requests that the City Council direct the appropriate City official to: 1) Identify each appeal that the Commission granted from an employee who sought to overturn a discharge or denial of promotion; 2) For each such granted appeal, identify the effect of the appeal, including but not limited to the employee's position, rate of pay and any other relevant information regarding the employee before and after the appeal was granted; 3) For each such employee who had an appeal granted, identify whether the employee is still employed with the City and if so, the employee's position; 4) For each such employee who had an appeal granted, identify whether the employee has applied for any promotions or transfers and, if so, the result of such application; 5) For each such employee who had an appeal granted, identify whether the employee has been disciplined or placed on a performance improvement plan, and, if so, the nature and outcome of such disciplinary action or performance improvement plan; and 6) Report the finding of such review back to the Commission Rationale: The MCS Commission is a five-member commission established by the City Charter that, among other things, hears appeals and makes final, binding decisions in the case of any municipal civil service employee who is discharged, suspended, demoted, denied a promotion, or put on disciplinary probation. The first appeal hearing heard by this Commission was in September 2014 and it has been approximately five years since that date. 1of2 The Commission …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 2:10 p.m.
Municipal Civil Service CommissionSept. 27, 2021

Backup Item 3c2 - 2021 MCSC Meeting Schedule original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

2021 Municipal Civil Service Commission Regular Meeting Schedule Monday, January 11, 2021 Monday, June 28, 2021 Monday, January 25, 2021 Monday, July 12, 2021 Monday, February 8, 2021 Monday, July 26, 2021 Monday, February 22, 2021 Monday, August 9, 2021 Monday, March 8, 2021 Monday, August 23, 2021 Monday, March 22, 2021 Monday, September 13, 2021 Monday, April 12, 2021 Monday, September 27, 2021 Monday, April 26, 2021 Monday, October 11, 2021 Monday, May 10, 2021 Monday, October 25, 2021 Monday, May 24, 2021 Monday, November 8, 2021 Monday, June 14, 2021 Monday, December 13, 2021 The 2021 MCS Commission Meeting Schedule was approved at the October 26, 2020 MCS Commission meeting.

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 2:10 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.1.0 - 3004 Belmont Cir - zoning change review sheet original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Windsor Road HLC DATE: September 27, 2021 PC DATE: TBD CASE NUMBER: C14H-2021-0144 APPLICANT: Claire Oswalt (property owner) HISTORIC NAME: Rubinett House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 3004 Belmont Circle ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from SF-3-NP (single family residence- neighborhood plan) to SF-3-H-NP (single family residence-historic landmark-neighborhood plan combining district zoning). QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: N/A PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The property is within the 2021 North Central Austin historic resource survey area. CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Historic Muny District, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, West Austin Neighborhood Group BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: The house’s near-pristine integrity enables it to clearly communicate its historical associations with the development of the Belmont subdivisions, the life and community impact of original owners Shirley and Jarrell Rubinett, the career of architects Lundgren & Maurer, and the character-defining features of Midcentury Modern residential architecture in Austin. Architecture: This architect-designed Midcentury Modern house derives significance from both its historical associations and its architecture. The house is associated with prominent local and international architecture firm, Lundgren & Maurer. It is a rare surviving example of their residential design in Austin, exhibiting many of the key character-defining features of their style. Even if considered without the association with Lundgren & Maurer, the house holds architectural significance as an exceptionally intact example of the regional adaptation of Midcentury Modern architecture popularized in 1950s Austin. See pages F-9 and F-10 in the following application for additional architectural descriptions. Historical Associations: The house is representative of significant trends in community planning and development and development in midcentury Austin, and it also is associated with significant individuals—Shirley and Jarrell “Tank” Rubinett—who played important roles in Austin’s business community and Jewish community in the late twentieth century. From the beginning of their time in Austin, Shirley and Jarrell Rubinett became deeply involved with ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A PHONE: 512-974-2727 ACTION: N/A Congregation Agudas Achim and Austin’s Jewish community. The house at 3004 Belmont Circle …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.1.1 - 3004 Belmont Cir - historic zoning application_redacted original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 65 pages

City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet A. APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC ZONING PROJECT INFORMATION: DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY APPLICATION DATE:__________________ FILE NUMBER(S) _____________________________________________ TENTATIVE HLC DATE: TENTATIVE PC or ZAP DATE:_________________ TENTATIVE CC DATE:_________________ CASE MANAGER _______________________________ APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:________________________________________ CITY INITIATED: YES / NO ROLLBACK: YES/NO BASIC PROJECT DATA: 1. OWNER’S NAME:________________________________________________________________________________ 2. PROJECT NAME:________________________________________________________________________________ 3. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (or Range): ____________________________________________ Spencer Baugher & Claire Oswalt 3004 Belmont Circle Historic Zoning Application 3004 Belmont Circle 78703 Travis ZIP__________________________ COUNTY:______________________________________ IF PROJECT ADDRESS CANNOT BE DEFINED ABOVE: LOCATED ____________ FRONTAGE FEET ALONG THE N. S. E. W. (CIRCLE ONE) SIDE OF ______________________________________ (ROAD NAME PROPERTY FRONTS ONTO), WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY _______________________________________ DISTANCE FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH _________________________________________ CROSS STREET. AREA TO BE REZONED: 4. ACRES _________________ 0.2646 (OR) SQ.FT._______________ 5. ZONING AND LAND USE INFORMATION: EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE TRACT# (IF MORE THAN 1) ________ __________ SF3 SF Residential N/A ________ __________ ________ __________ __________ __________ __________ ACRES / SQ. FT. PROPOSED USE PROPOSED ZONING _______________ 0.2646 _______________ _______________ _____________ Same _____________ _____________ ____________ SF3-H ____________ ____________ RELATED CURRENT CASES: 6. ACTIVE ZONING CASE? 7. RESTRICTIVE COVENANT? (YES / NO) 8. SUBDIVISION? 9. SITE PLAN? (YES / NO) (YES / NO) (YES / NO) FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ Adopted December 2012 6 City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet B. Tax Map Full size tax maps (1"=100') showing properties within 300' of zoning request Per email correspondence with the City of Austin, the entirety of the Historic Zoning Application Package now may be submitted electronically, including the site plan. An electronic reproduction of the site plan is included below. A large map in paper format is available upon request. City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet 1 2 3 4 5 F. 1: Historical Documentation – Deed Chronology Deed Research for (fill in address) 3004 Belmont Circle, Austin, TX 78703 List Deeds chronologically, beginning with earliest transaction first and proceeding through present ownership. The first transaction listed should date at least back to when the original builder of any historic structures on the site first acquired the property (i.e., should pre-date the construction of any buildings/structures on the site). Please use the format delineated below. For each transaction please include: name of Grantor/Grantee, date of transaction, legal description involved, price, …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.1.a - 3004 Belmont Cir - citizen comment original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.2.0 - 3703 Meadowbank Dr - zoning change review sheet original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 42 pages

CASE NUMBER: TBD ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET HLC DATE: September 27, 2021 PC DATE: N/A APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Frank W. Denius House WATERSHED: Taylor Slough North NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: West Austin Neighborhood ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 3703 Meadowbank Dr. ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from SF-3-NP (single family residence – neighborhood plan) to SF-3-H-NP (single family residence –historic landmark—neighborhood plan combining district zoning). QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: Architecture and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: N/A PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: N/A DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The house is beyond the bounds of any historic resources survey to date. CITY COUNCIL DATE: N/A ORDINANCE READINGS: N/A ACTION: N/A ORDINANCE NUMBER: N/A CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras PHONE: 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Barton Creek Assn., Save Historic Muny District, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, TNR BCP - Travis County Natural Resources, Tarrytown Alliance , Tarrytown Neighborhood Association, West Austin Neighborhood Group BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: Architecture: The building is an example of the Classical Revival style. It was designed by George Matthews Page of Austin’s Page-Southerland-Page. It is likely that Denius was familiar with Page-Southerland-Page’s work at the University of Texas at the time of construction. Page’s two-story symmetrical Greek Revival design features a hipped roof and brick cladding. Its full-width integral porch and second-floor balcony are supported by Classical columns. Ground-floor windows are 6:6, while second-floor fenestration comprises glazed 4-pane French doors. Wood shutters surround all doors and windows. The pool cabana at the rear of the lot, designed by architect Craig M. Overmiller, features matching columns, full-height multi-light windows with fan lights above, and a metal mansard roof. It was constructed after the period of significance and does not contribute to the property’s historic character. Historical Associations: The house at 3703 Meadowbank Drive was built in 1966 for Franklin W. Denius, decorated World War II veteran and renowned University of Texas sponsor. At 19, Denius fought in the Battle of Mortain in 1944 as an infantry staff sergeant, holding a vital position for the Allies against 40,000 Nazi troops. His foresight and innovation helped to create a turning point in the war after the Normandy landings, forever changing history. After Mortain, …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.2.1 - 3703 Meadowbank Dr - plans original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 10 pages

A u s t i n , T e x a s VICINITY MAP ABBREVIATIONS AD ADJ AFF APPROX BLDG BOB CB CJ CL CAB CLG CLKG CLO CNTR COL CONC CONSTR CONT CRPT CTR CTSK D DF DO DS DEPT DET DIA DIM DN DR DTL DW DWG DWR EG EXG EJ ELEV EQ EQUIP EXP EXT FA FD FF FFE FOC FOF FOS FDN FIN FLR FRZ FT FTG FURR GB GC GA GALV GL GND GR GWB HB HC HM HDW HDWD HDWR HNDCP HORIZ HR HT ID IN INSUL INT JST JT KIT LIN LB LAB LAM LAV LKR LT LTWT MC MO MECH AREA DRAIN ADJUSTABLE ABOVE FINISH FLOOR APPROXIMATE BUILDING BOTTOM OF BEAM CATCH BASIN CEILING JOIST CENTERLINE CABINET CEILING CAULKING CLOSET COUNTER COLUMN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CARPET CENTER OR COUNTER COUNTERSUNK DIAMETER DOUGLASS FIR DOOR OPENING DOWNSPOUT DEPARTMENT DETAIL DIAMETER DIMENSION DOWN DOOR DETAIL DISHWASHER DRAWING DRAWER EXISTING GRADE EXISTING EXPANSION ELEVATION EQUAL EQUIPMENT EXPOSED EXTERIOR FIRE ALARM FLOOR DRAIN FINISH FACE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FACE OF CONCRETE FACE OF FINISH FACE OF STUCCO FOUNDATION FINISH FLOOR FREEZER FOOT OR FEET FOOTING FURRING GRAB BAR GENERAL CONTRACTOR GAUGE GALVANIZED GLASS OR GLAZING GROUND GRADE GYPSUM WALL BOARD HOSE BIBB HANDICAP HOLLOW METAL HARDWARE HARDWOOD HARDWARE HANDICAP HORIZONTAL HOUR HEIGHT INTERIOR DESIGNER INCHES INSULATION INTERIOR JOIST JOINT KITCHEN LINEN CLOSET LEADER BOX LABORATORY LAMINATED LAVATORY LOCKER LIGHT LIGHTWEIGHT MEDICINE CABINET MASONRY OPENING MECHANICAL MFCTR MIN MIR MISC MTD MTL MUL N NIC NTS NOM O OC OD O/M OBS OPNG P TILE PL PLAM PW PLAS PW PRCST QB R RD RO R/F RR RAD REC REF REINF REQ'D REV RGTR RM S S TILE SC SD SS S.SK SCHED SEC SH SHWR SIM SPEC STD STL STOR STRUCT SYM T&G T TB TC TO TOB TOC TOD TOW TP TPD TRS TV TOW TEL TEMP TER THK TYP UNO UNF UR VERT VEST VIF VWB VWBD VWE VWID VWLA VWLD VWME VWO W WC WI WP W/ or W W/O WD WSCT WT N MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MIRROR MISCELLANEOUS MOUNTED METAL MULLION NORTH NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE NOMINAL OVEN ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER/DIMENSION OVEN & MICROWAVE OBSCURE OPENING PORCELAIN TILE PLATE PLASTIC LAMINATE PLYWOOD PLASTER PLYWOOD PRE-CAST QUARRY BLOCK RISER OR RADIUS ROOF DRAIN ROUGH OPENING REFRIGERATOR - FREEZER ROOF RAFTER RADIUS RECOMMENDATION REFERENCE OR REFRIGERATOR REINFORCED REQUIRED REVISION REGISTER ROOM SOUTH …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:20 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.2.2 - 3703 Meadowbank Dr - Owner opposition letter original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

PROTEST OF PROPOSED REZONING OF 3703 MEADOWBANK DRIVE FROM SF-3-NP I hereby protest any rezoning of the referenced property to any category other than the current SF-3-NP designation. Because of the strong negative racial overtones associated with the building’s current plantation style façade, we wish to modify the appearance of the building to an architectural style that is more widely accepted by all of Austin’s citizens. Sincerely, ___________________________________ Will Hardeman, Owner Date ___________________

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.2.3 - 3703 Meadowbank Dr - applicant email original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Jim Wittliff Contreras, Kalan Brummett, Elizabeth; Will Hardeman; Allen, Amber; John Stoddard Re: 3703 Meadowbank Dr. Monday, August 30, 2021 1:30:11 PM PROTEST OF PROPOSED REZONING OF[1].pdf Thank you for those replies, Kalan. The property owner has decided to file a protest to the City’s proposed rezoning, which is attached. A significant reason for his opposition is that the prior owner whom Mr. Hardeman purchased the property from, Frank Denius’ son, had requested and was granted a full demolition permit for the property. Mr. Hardeman bought the property with the demolition permit, but he instead wishes to retain a significant portion of the structure, but wants to redesign the façade to remove the plantation appearance, which he and many others associate with slavery. Sincerely, Jim Wittliff

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

A.2.4 - 3703 Meadowbank Dr - AHC original drawings_PSP-6508 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 17 pages

画 、いを 、、物 第 、4 1 角 0~「 ~、 L「 SE へ ゴ 0こ 、 す : 埠 82 、いド 翁に 価 0新当、 ド 物 、ー ふ ー 1 1 1 3 0 宿 「 第 、ト 1、0【 ハ ・ ハ 00L 一こ ョ 0を 伊ド 0 い、ト、 ト 0をコ「 (0 「国【ト p 一(ト物 ~、「~物 新ト 一い い、動、い魯ト .第計ト、~ト 、、ハ物 じ ゝ L075 ” 、「、00 2れ、 、民 8」.00を 、 5 、 、 4) ハ、、メ E第 、~、 0第 当 0吶 20 薹 ョ、エ、ヨⅲ、 0 」 Aこ い い 5 SIT E PLAN DET AILS 8 R E 9一0 E N 0 E FO R PAGE ・ SOUT 工 ERLANO 当 03 ・ PAGE ・ ARC 工 FR AN 第 K匚 EAOOW N W. DE N一u S AUSTIN の Aよ 興 0ー 無 R ( 0・7、「ま 0、 一96」 ・ ENGIN ER A u 5 T一 N・ T E X A 4 は 』 要 「ミ よ な .0 7 く 価 ト 00 、840 、 0 ( 要 R00 ーい E00 第 0 :、、、な -0=一・; 345・ 、・9 2 ・ を一′00W を ′0工 を 5 ASE A当 レ ) 01 に 、・1. STEL -第 1工 工 L 工 ELE ・ 5 E第 ELCV, ELE 2よ 、 、 01 50工 ・ FIREPLACE 《 .. 0 : -.を CA ED」にE・ INTERIOR 一DOR. P、 当 1市 ま 第 R一0工 当 工 1 E00 16 Eに 、 第 《0 25 0F1 と し に 00 一 一0、 E广物 、 - 0 Tと -第 T「 第 一 OR F一第 一 3工 口 TA 一 LS 一0第 い 、 30 EL に E 、 . FIRST 「 LOON 5工 E E T 一 N DE X 要 SECC ~4!SCE「戸、よ「0」3 産・4・一251 要 ・3 E・2・ ・2 ー E- - 一 の 5い0ま F量 「一工 ASE 51 0ま 31 誕 産 0第LO望 「 0 E 0 「に00第 「 L002 に FLOO FLOOR 1 0っ 工 【 R を レ EC p「 .C、 PL 0- 工 、 0ー PL 、 よ の !第0 ま 一第 ・ PLAN P「レ よ 0を1と 「 01 L3 一 ! C 0 P「と - PLAN CT 一の -5 「 第 0トヨ 一 0よ ′0ト r一0こ の u一 LD 一こい 2 3 0て 1一 T【一5 0エ コ 伝 DE 0て 1一T へ、 こ へ .、 、よ 0 こ い 0・ 、 3 、第 1VA11 ー 0 一4び Cい [ョ 1 け 「トド 山、 ~、べ ー ト E い E …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

B.1.0 - Paggi House - 200 Lee Barton Dr original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 C14H-1974-0006; HR-2021-100814 PAGGI HOUSE 200 LEE BARTON DR. B.1 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Replace existing butterfly roof and construct stucco and glass walls between the buildings to fully enclose the courtyard. 1) Replace an existing butterfly roof over the courtyard and create a conditioned, weather-tight space. The new low-slope shed roof will extend southward to fully envelope the milk house, which is only partially covered by the existing roof. Walls with storefront windows will line the boundary between the courtyard and perimeter historic buildings, with minimal connections around door openings. The new walls will be smooth EIFS (exterior insulation finishing system) with an integral gray coloration, and the windows will have bronze aluminum frames. Roofing will be prefinished bronze standing-seam metal. Concrete flooring will infill gaps in the existing slabs at the courtyard. 2) Remove a non-historic building adjacent to the milk house. Renovate and construct a small addition to the existing restroom building at the west end of the courtyard. The building will be reclad with integral color EIFS. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS The historic Paggi House includes four separate historic structures: the painted brick house and kitchen, the limestone milk house, and the plaster and limestone cistern, which remain in good condition from prior restorations. Additional freestanding accessory structures were built around the historic courtyard in 2010, including an expansive butterfly roof that partially covers the historic structures. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Commercial additions 1. Location Per Standard 1.1, the proposed enclosure is tucked within the historic courtyard, where it will be relatively inconspicuous. Standard 1.3 advises minimizing loss of historic fabric by connecting to an existing building through the most noninvasive location and methods. The new courtyard enclosure will connect to the historic buildings at limited locations around door openings, under the eaves of the historic roofs. 2. Scale, massing, and height The proposed project modifies an existing roof over the courtyard. As reconfigured, it remains subordinate in scale to the historic buildings and is minimally visible from its surroundings in keeping with Standards 2.1–2.3. 3. Design and style The addition will be executed in a modern style with restrained details that …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

B.1.1 - 200 Lee Barton Dr - Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of None page

Backup

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

B.2.0 - 1616 Northwood Rd original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 C14H-2017-0082; HR-2021-084469 MCDONALD-DOUGHTIE HOUSE 1616 NORTHWOOD RD. B.2 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Replace existing wood fence with stucco estate wall around back yard, construct new black iron fence around front yard, replace sidewalk, and create a landing at the curb. 1) Construct a perimeter wall at the backyard in place of an existing wood fence. The 6-to-8’-tall wall will have a stucco finish and brick piers, painted white, with a limestone cap. 2) Construct a black iron picket fence around the front yard. The fence will be no more than 4’ in height. 3) Create a landing where the sidewalk meets the curb. The landing will be stone or concrete to match the sidewalk. At the perimeter will be a low retaining wall of white-painted stucco and brick with a limestone cap. An adjacent historic stacked stone retaining wall will be repaired. 4) Replace the deteriorated front sidewalk in-kind with concrete, or with a continuous limestone path similar to the existing limestone porch. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS The house is a two-story, rectangular-plan, side-gabled brick-veneered frame house with a full-width, full-height inset porch on full-height brick columns. The brick cladding is painted white. Fenestration is single 8:8, reflecting the Southern Colonial Revival style of the house. The house has a large addition to the back. No historic landscape features are specifically identified in the landmark file. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Sites and streetscapes 2. Walls and fences The existing wood privacy fence is not historic, and the historic dry stacked retaining wall at the curb will be repaired, per Standards 2.1 and 2.2. Standard 2.4 indicates that new street-side fences and site walls should be compatible but differentiated from the historic style and period of the building. The materials of the proposed estate wall are differentiated, with a unified color palette and simple design that are compatible with the historic house. The proposed metal picket fence is also compatible with the character of the house. This standard further indicates that new fences and walls should be in keeping with fence styles and heights within a historic district, when applicable. Similar walls and fences have been …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.
Historic Landmark CommissionSept. 27, 2021

B.2.1 - 1616 Northwood Rd - Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 14 pages

Duewall Home Beautification McDonald-Doughtie House 1616 Northwood Road Austin, Texas 78703 List of Outdoor Home Improvements Seeking Commission Approval ● Estate Wall in place of wood fence ● Iron Fence in front yard ● Curb Appeal and Hardscape Landing at the curb ● Sidewalk Improvement Our Landscaping / Hardscaping Plan Current Photo of the House Current Wood Fence (showing this is a high priority maintenance issue) Current Hardscaping and Sidewalk (showing this is a high priority maintenance issue) ● Current Sidewalk and Dry Stack Rock “Retaining Wall” at the street (after Google Fiber went through the dry stack retaining wall). As you can see, it needs to be rehabbed for the beautification on the property. Historical Commission Item #1 - Estate Wall Replace poor quality wood fence (that is deteriorating in some places) with an estate wall, similar to other estate walls in our historic neighborhood (as shown below). Materials would include stucco over cinder block, limestone top, and possibly white brick columns as depicted below. Height is 6’ to 8’ dependent on allowance from other city departments. Estate Wall Continued ● Clockwise: a) current fence, b) rough sketch, c) plan showing wall, d) area for possibly recessing wall by a few inches on either side of house (West & East views) Historical Commission Item #2 - Black Iron Fence ● Requesting a black decorative fence in the perimeter of our front yard as typical of our historic neighborhood to improve safety and security of the property due to a busy intersection. ● Materials to include high quality commercial grade fencing material, not more than 4 feet in height. Historical Commission Item #3: Hardscaped Passenger Landing at the Street and Improved Sidewalk ● We would like to use the existing dry stack rock we have to reconstruct the small retaining wall as it comes from our next door neighbor’s house. ● Then at the curb, we want to cut into the yard for a landing to allow for a car door to open and a passenger to safely exit a car. ● The horizontal plane of the “landing area” will be the same material as the sidewalk. ● The vertical plane will be constructed out of a material to compliment and coordinate but not “match” the rock from the adjacent retaining wall at the street such as stucco over cinder block with a limestone top to match the estate wall …

Scraped at: Sept. 23, 2021, 3:21 p.m.