HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-062618 LINDEMANN HOUSE 1100 E. 8TH STREET PROPOSAL Repair windows. Replace window at rear elevation with door. B.2 – 1 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair 18 windows. See full restoration proposal in backup. 2) Replace one window with door at rear of house. The proposed door’s dimensions will match existing opening width and upper extent. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project repairs 18 historic-age windows. It removes historic fabric at the rear of the building where a window replaces a door. Summary The project partially meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Request that the applicant retain the rear window to be removed on-site for replacement in the future, then approve the application. The applicant has amended the proposal to be more sensitive to the building’s historic fabric. LOCATION MAP B.2 – 2
June 21, 2022 WINDOW RESTORATION PROPOSAL Proposal For: Amanda & Ben Wahlstom – Project Address: 1109 E. 8th Street, Austin, TX Number of windows: 18 Wood Window Full Restoration Scope of Work: Note: Restoration is an art, not a science. Although this is our general process, we may have to adjust as needed • • • • Sashes and stop will be removed and openings sealed with plywood (Faux Acrylic inserts available as upgrade) Transport sashes from job site to our shop in Austin. Sashes will be thoroughly examined in the shop and numbered prior to restoration process Jambs and sills at the job site will also be thoroughly inspected for necessary repairs. RRR estimates 10% of sills (or 2 windows) will require replacement. Sashes: Sashes will be stripped, sanded, primed, painted, glazed and slotted for weatherstripping. • • Abatron will be used to repair holes, splitting and cracks throughout the sash. Any areas of rot more than 8” will require Dutchman repairs. • A borate-based preservative (Boracare) will be applied to all bare wood prior to finish. This will minimize the risk of • • future rot or pest damage to the wood. Sash Rebuilds: rebuilds will use Spanish Cedar or Sipo Mahogany. RRR assumes 22% of sashes (or 4 windows) will require a component to be rebuilt (i.e. bottom or upper rail, stile or meeting rail). Sashes requiring major or complete rebuild will require a change order unless noted on the schedule. Paint & Stain: Sashes will be painted, glazing lines hand painted. Benjamin Moore Regal Select in Low Lustre will be used unless otherwise specified. Includes one color only. Pricing includes painted interior and exterior on all of the windows. • Glazing Putty: Glazing putty will be Sarco Type M. Glazing lines will be hand painted to seal putty for longevity • Glass: All historic wavy glass will be re-used if possible. Replacement glass will be 1/8” double strength clear flat glass. Wavy glass available as an upgrade Jambs/Sills: Jambs prepped and painted onsite Sash Hardware: Hardware can be cleaned and reused - excludes removal of paint, repair or replacement hardware Stop and parting bead to be replaced • • • • Weatherstripping: New concealed interlocking weatherstripping will used on functional windows when the sashes are reinstalled in the jambs. Bulb will be used at the meeting rails. Sash Cord: New Sampson spot sash cord will be …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084104 SEBRON SNEED HOUSE 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD B.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an apartment complex around the Sneed House ruins. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a three-building apartment complex around the Sebron Sneed House ruins, providing a 25’ buffer zone between the ruins and the pool and other new construction. Proposed buildings are each three stories in height and display Mission Revival stylistic cues; they are clad in stucco and capped with hipped, tiled roofs. Columned arches accent the main entrance to each building. 2) Construct a fence around the ruins. Note: The applicant has provided 2015 correspondence, per Committee feedback, showing that former Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky requested a mortar analysis and preliminary stabilization plan. The applicant specified that tuck-pointing and consolidation would be implemented following an observation report and recommendation from a masonry restoration contractor, as well as erection of a double steel fence around the ruins (see backup). DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location, 2. Orientation, 4. Proportions While individual design standards cater to neighborhood residences’ setbacks and streetscapes, the proposed project does not comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s guidance for siting new buildings near historic properties. The proposed apartment complex will visually overpower the existing ruins. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed project does not appear to conform to the relevant standards, though each building does appear to be segmented into two modules. 5. Design and style, 6. Roofs, 7. Exterior walls, 8. Windows and doors The proposed building’s Mission Revival design elements and modern fenestration do not reflect the Sneed House during its period of significance, nor do they relate to its current state by incorporating similar materials, scale, etc. 10. Chimneys The proposed buildings do not include boxed chimneys. Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping The proposed project maintains only a 25’ buffer between the historic ruins and the apartments’ active circulation elements and amenities. Since no bracing is planned for the ruins, there may be safety concerns as well as concerns regarding accelerated deterioration, as the 25’ buffer immediately abuts the complex’s swimming pool. 2. Walls and fences …
SLIDING GATES SOLID WOOD FENCE THE CIRCLE AT THE NELMS APARTMENTS 6301 BLUFF SPRINGS ROAD AUSTIN, TEXAS 78744 (BLDGS-1, 2,&3) Tchen Architect 1303 ELM FOREST DRIVE CEDAR PARK, TEXAS 78613 512.351.1801 512.870.9427 (FAX) tchenarch@gmail.com Drawings & written materials appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without written consent of the architect. C 2022 TCHEN ARCHITECTS NELMS DR. 1 BLDG-2 (4) 1-B UNITS (20) 2-B UNITS "RUINS" AREA 2,050 S.F. 7826 s.f. Roof 598 1 LAUNDRY MECH D A O R S G N I R P S F F U L B MAIL BOX 318 APT OFFICE BLDG-1 (12) 1-B UNITS 9,739 S.F. BIKE RACKS K L A W T E F SID 5 300 4315 s.f. Roof 1 1 S E T A G G SLIDIN TRUE NORTH INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DRAWING TITLE SYNOPSIS & VICINITY MAP ADA-TAS STANDARDS DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR LIFE SAFETY FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY SECOND FLOOR LIFE SAFETY THIRD FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN THIRD FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ENLARGED UNIT FLOOR PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION BUILDING CROSS SECTION STAIRWAY TYPICAL DETAILS WALL & FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DOOR SCHEDULE & WALL TYPES A0-0.0 A0-0.1 A0-0.2 L1-1.0 L1-1.1 L1-1.2 L2-1.0 L2-1.1 L2-1.2 L3-1.0 L3-1.1 L3-1.2 A1-1.0 A1-1.1 A1-1.2 A1-1.3 A1-1.4 A1-1.5 A1-1.6 A1-2.0 A1-2.1 A1-3.0 A1-3.1 A1-3.2 A1-4.0 A2-1.0 A2-1.1 A2-1.2 A2-1.3 A21.4 A2-1.5 A2-2.0 A2-2.1 A2-2.2 A2-3.0 A2-3.1 A2-3.2 A2-4.0 A3-1.0 A3-1.1 A3-1.2 A3-1.3 A3-1.4 A3-1.5 A3-2.0 A3-2.1 A3-3.0 A3-3.1 A3-3.2 A3-4.0 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 S-24 S-25 M-00 M-01 M-02 E-00 E-02 E-03 P-00 P-01 P-02 S-01 BLDG-1 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION PLAN BLDG-2 FOUNDATION TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAILS BLDG-1 …
Subject: Fwd: Ruins at 1801 Nelms, (6305 Bluff Springs) Stone Restoration , SAEEDAH MINHAS Harry Karr From: Tracy Chen Date: June 9, 2022 at 3:23 PM To: TChen Projects Forwarding email-1. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Tracy Chen Date: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:36 PM Subject: Fwd: Ruins at 1801 Nelms, (6305 Bluff Springs) Stone Restoration To: Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov> Cc: Saeed Minhas Dear Steve, Thank you for your time meeting with Mr. Saeed Minhas, the project owner, and me, the Architect on Record, for the stone restoration of the subject project. We would like to propose that the owner will immediately undertake the process of obtaining a qualified Masonry Restoration Contractor to begin the preservation work. Upon such time of selecting the Contractor, we will explore and consult with persons with expertise in these restoration areas: we will evaluate the stability of the stone walls with a detailed Observation Report, and obtain a Recommendation of the scope of work. Mortar specification is based on Sec. 04902 - 1.1 MORTAR MATERIALS Add specific requirements to suit Project. A. Portland Cement: ASTM C 150, Type I or Type II. B. Hydrated Lime: ASTM C 207, Type S. Product below must be slaked before it is used. C. Quicklime: ASTM C 5, pulverized lime. 1. Provide white cement containing not more than 0.60 percent total alkali when tested according to ASTM C 114. 2. Low-Alkali Cement: Portland cement for use with limestone shall contain not more than 0.60 percent total alkali when tested according to ASTM C 114. D. Factory-Prepared Lime Putty: Screened, fully-slaked lime putty, prepared from pulverized lime complying with ASTM C 5. E. Mortar Sand: ASTM C 144, unless otherwise indicated. 1. Color: Provide natural sand[ or ground marble, granite, or other sound stone]; of color necessary to produce required mortar color. 2. For pointing mortar, provide sand with rounded edges. 3. Match size, texture, and gradation of existing mortar sand as closely as possible. Blend several sands, if necessary, to achieve suitable match. If known, indicate source of sand and size and gradation. G. Water: Potable. The main effort of restoration will be concentrated in the stabilization of the "Ruins", by ways of "Tuck Pointing" with specified Tuck-pointing Mortar (referencing to the Video: http://quikrete.com/AtHome/Video-Tuckpointing-Mortar-Joints.asp? gclid=CO36tfK30sgCFQmJaQod3F8ACw ), and apply/inject epoxy where deem required. Structural Bracing is not considered at this point. Please note the Limit of Restoration will …
CITY OF AUSTIN – PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT CASE NUMBER: REVISION #: CASE MANAGER: SP-2014-0370C 00 Rosemary Avila UPDATE: PHONE #: U0 512-974-2784 PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: The Circle at Nelms Multi-Family Developmental Site Plan 6305 BLUFF SPRINGS RD W/BLDGS & UNITS SUBMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2014 REPORT DUE DATE: December 1, 2014 FINAL REPORT DATE: December 11, 2014 10 DAYS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE UPDATE DEADLINE STAFF REPORT: This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent site plan submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated site plan submittal. The site plan will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. However, until this happens, your site plan is considered disapproved. Additional comments may be generated as a result of information or design changes provided in your update. If you have any questions, problems, concerns, or if you require additional information about this report, please do not hesitate to contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by writing to the City of Austin, Planning and Development Review Department, P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78704. UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 25-5-113): It is the responsibility of the applicant or his/her agent to update this site plan application. The final update to clear all comments must be submitted by the update deadline, which is March 27, 2015. Otherwise, the application will automatically be denied. If this date falls on a weekend or City of Austin holiday, the next City of Austin workday will be the deadline. EXTENSION OF UPDATE DEADLINE (LDC 25-1-88): You may request an extension to the update deadline by submitting a written justification to your case manager on or before the update deadline. Extensions may be granted for good cause at the Director’s discretion. UPDATE SUBMITTALS: A formal update submittal is required. You must make an appointment with the Intake Staff (974-2689) to submit the update. Please bring a copy of this report with you upon submittal to Intake. Please submit 11 copies of the plans and 12 copies of a letter that address each comment for distribution to the following reviewers. Clearly label information or packets with the reviewer’s name that are intended for specific reviewers. No distribution is required for the Planner 1 and only …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-068314 MCDONALD-MCGOWN HOUSE 1802 LAVACA STREET B.4 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish brick wall. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish an existing brick wall, topped with wrought iron, at the rear of the property. Remove wrought-iron gate. Do not replace. ARCHITECTURE 1802 Lavaca Street is a brick Second Empire building with a Mansard roof, built in 1876. While the wrought iron gate and trim were added in 1972 per the historic zoning application, the date of the wall is unrecorded in City permit records and certificates of appropriateness. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Sites and streetscapes 2. Walls and fences While the design standards do not address non-street-facing walls and fences, they do prohibit covering or painting historic- age masonry site walls. Summary The project may meet the applicable standards. If the wall dates to the time of later restoration and modification of the property, demolition without replacement is within the scope of the design standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. The applicant has provided information that shows the wall was constructed in the 1970s. LOCATION MAP B.4 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos B.4 – 3 1975 image showing rear wall. Yancey, Michael D. [Historic Property, Photograph THC_07-0174], photograph, February 6, 1975; (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth672897/m1/1/?q=%221802%20lavaca%22: accessed June 22, 2022), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting Texas Historical Commission.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084176 THOMAS FAMILY HOME 1119 E. 11TH STREET B.5 – 1 PROPOSAL Repair deteriorated wood elements or replace in-kind where deteriorated beyond repair. Repair foundation, replace porch steps, and replace roof in-kind. Remove non-original additions, repair historic-age windows and doors, and replace deteriorated or non-original windows and doors. Repair porch handrail, raise porch trim, and install an ADA-compliant lift. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair existing siding at north, west, and east elevations. Repair shingles at gable. Retain trim. 2) Replace corrugated metal foundation skirting with wood lattice. 3) Replace shingle roof and gutters in-kind. 4) Replace front concrete steps with wood steps. Relocate and replace steps at east elevation to accommodate ADA lift. 5) Repair existing handrail. 6) Repair and repaint existing front door. Reorient to open out. Replace non-historic door at east elevation. Add new kitchen access door and steps at west rear elevation. 7) Repair historic windows. Where deteriorated beyond repair, replace in-kind. Remove non-original window at rear addition. molding. 8) Repair porch columns. Where deteriorated beyond repair, replace in-kind. Raise trim height and remove non-original 9) Demolish non-historic water heater closet and non-original lean-to addition at east elevation. ARCHITECTURE One-story wing-and-gable house with a hipped roof and projecting gables with fish-scale shingling at tympanum and a wraparound porch supported by Doric columns. The front gable has a large window with a multi-lite transom, indicative of the Queen Anne style. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project repairs and stabilizes deteriorated siding, trim, windows, doors, and columns; it only replaces deteriorated elements when they are damaged beyond repair. It removes some non-original accretions that do not appear to be character-defining features of the house, though they were constructed during the historic period. 2. Foundations The proposed project stabilizes the house’s foundation and replaces the corrugated metal skirting with brick. The brick appears appropriate, provided that pier locations are articulated per Committee feedback so as not to create an unbroken masonry expanse. 3. Roofs The proposed project replaces the existing shingle roof in-kind. The proposed roofline modifications at the rear are not appropriate, as they alter an …
T H O M A S H O U S E E A S T S I D E S T R E E T FA C I N G F R O N T B A W E S T S I D E L O O K I N G S O U T H G C F W E S T S I D E L O O K I N G N O R T H A L L E Y FA C I N G S O U T H A L L E Y FA C I N G S O U T H S O U T H E A S T C O R N E R E D E X I S T I N G E X T E R I O R C O N D I T I O N S A L E T T E R D E N O T E S L O C AT I O N O N E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N THOMAS HOUSE1119 E 11TH ST AUSTIN TX 7870210 JUNE 2022 N F O Y E R K I T C H E N B AT H R O O M L K J I M H B E D R O O M D E N ( N O T O R I G I N A L ) S I T T I N G R O O M L I V I N G R O O M E X I S T I N G I N T E R I O R C O N D I T I O N S A L E T T E R D E N O T E S L O C AT I O N O N E X I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N THOMAS HOUSE1119 E 11TH ST AUSTIN TX 7870210 JUNE 2022 F W/H 4/WEST ELEVATION N 11°24'20" E 102.28' PROPERTY LINE 5' SETBACK OH OH KITCHEN DINING ROOM LIVING ROOM N O I T A V E L E H T U O S / 3 OH E ) T A L P R E P ( Y E L L A ' …
D E T E R I O R AT I N G F O U N D AT I O N , M E TA L S K I R T AT P O R C H D E C K A N D E X P O S E D S O I L S TA C K . N O N - O R I G I N A L A LT E R AT I O N S AT D E E P E R C O V E R E D P O R C H R O O F S U P P O R T B E A M S , S H O R T E N E D C O L U M N S A N D P LY W O O D AT C O V E R E D P O R C H C E I L I N G . R E P L A C E N O N - O R I G I N A L S I D E R E F R E S H F R O N T E N T R A N C E E N T R A N C E D O O R D O O R A D D I T I O N A L E X H I B I T S THOMAS HOUSE1119 E 11TH ST AUSTIN TX 7870210 JUNE 2022
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084089 BRASS-GODDARD HOUSE 1108 W. 9TH STREET B.6 – 1 PROPOSAL Repair deteriorated porch elements and windows. Reopen enclosed door opening at front porch and install door and transom. Add elevator shaft to north elevation. Replace existing rear addition, add arbor at east elevation, and renovate existing garage and guest house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS and wood windows. 1) Repair deteriorated porch elements, including wood columns, wood balustrade, wood frieze and trim, porch foundation, 2) Reopen enclosed opening at front porch and install a door. 3) Add elevator and elevator shaft to north façade. The proposed elevator shaft allows access to all three floors. 4) Demolish two-story addition at rear (north) elevation. Construct a new two-story addition. The proposed addition includes a screened porch connecting to the guest house. Fenestration includes fixed-glazing steel windows and doors at full and half-height. Proposed cladding includes vertical wood rainscreen and metal shingle siding. Roof materials include nonreflective paint-grip standing seam metal. 5) Install detached steel arbor at east elevation. 6) Renovate existing detached garage and guest house to match addition. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Three-story limestone house designed by Jacob Larmour with Mansard roof, gabled dormers, limestone masonry cladding, second-floor veranda, widow’s walk, and wrap-around porch supported by Corinthian columns. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project includes repair, rather than replacement, of historic character-defining features. The application has been amended to reopen an enclosed door using physical evidence of patching and replace it with a door, rather than with a window from the rear of the building. 2. Foundations The proposed project repairs the deteriorated foundation and pavers in-kind. 3. Roofs The proposed project removes some roof material at the rear for the installation of an elevator. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs deteriorated trim. The application has been amended to reopen an enclosed door using physical evidence of patching and replace it with a door, rather than with a window from the rear of the building. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project includes repair of existing windows and replacement of an infilled door and transom. 6. Porches The …
DEMO EXIST. WOOD PRIVACY FENCE CUT BACK EXISTING FLATWORK FOR NEW STONE WALL DEMO EXIST. CONC. STOOP DEMO EXIST. GARAGE ROOF DEMO EXIST. WOOD PRIVACY FENCE DEMO EXIST. STONE STOOP DEMO STEPPING STONES 6'- 2 3 /8 " 1 R EXISTING DRIVE STRIPS TO REMAIN A/C A/C A/C K C A B T E S D R A Y E D S 5 I ' SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 24" X 36". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 12" X 18". 15' ALLEY EXIST. CONC. PARKING PAD UNDERGROUND SERVICE FROM POLE TO EM 10' REAR YARD SETBACK LOT 19 BLK.7 LOT 20 BLK.7 LINE OF EXIST. 2ND STORY ABOVE, SEE DEMO FLOOR PLAN. EXIST. ONE STORY WOOD FRAME GARAGE F.F.= 107.7' EXIST. CONC. PAD | || | || | | | | CUT BACK EXISTING FLATWORK FOR NEW STONE WALL || || || || LOT 21 BLK.7 EXIST. TWO STORY WOOD FRAME GUEST HOUSE F.F.= 106.7' I P U Q E L O O P DEMO EXIST. STONE RETAINING WALL EXIST. POOL EXIST. THREE STORY HISTORIC STONE RESIDENCE F.F.= 107.7' UP EXIST. COVERED PORCH R 9'-6" UP 25' FRONT YARD SETBACK R 9'-6" DEMO EXIST. SIDEWALK DEMO EXIST. CONC. APRON TEMPORARY BENCHMARK: TRIANGLE CUT ON CURB. ASSUMED ELEV. = 100.0' DEMO SITE PLAN 1 W. 9TH STREET (60' R.O.W.) SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 24" X 36". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 12" X 18". UP SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" PLAN NORTH T RU E NO R TH EXIST. CONC. STEPS TO REMAIN UP UP LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 19&20 & W 4 FT OF LOT 21 BLK 7 OLT 5 DIV Z SILLIMAN SUBD E 46 FT OF LOT 21 BLK 7 OLT 5 DIV Z SILLIMAN SUBD ZONING MF-4-H-HD-NP & MF-4-HD-NP LOT SIZE 22,551 SF TREE SCHEDULE TREE # SIZE/TYPE T294 32.4" OAK T295 19" MAGNOLIA T296 19" ELM T297 9" MAGNOLIA T298 10" OAK T299 11.8" OAK T300 10.2" OAK T301 9.2" OAK T302 11.2" OAK T303 10.4" OAK 1. 2. 3. 4. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. PROTECTED TREE NOTES: DRIP LINE CALCULATION 1'-0" PER 0'-1" OF TRUNK ALL TREES & NATURAL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF AUSTIN STANDARDS OF TREE PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMIT APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TREES WITH A DIAMETER OF 19" …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-075037 HILDRETH-FLANAGAN-HEIERMAN HOUSE 3909 AVENUE G B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a swimming pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE Install a swimming pool, deck, and patio in side yard. Replace existing fence and plant privacy hedges around the pool area. The house’s 1990 National Register nomination describes it as follows: […] 2-story frame dwelling that was built in 1902. As is sometimes seen on contemporaneous houses, the dwelling retains the features of Victorian-era housing coupled with details from the Classical Revival style. The house remains virtually unaltered and is in good condition. A massive 2-story dwelling with a generally square plan, the house rests on a pier-and-beam foundation. The primary (east) facade is dominated by a 2-tier porch featuring Doric columns and turned-wood balustrades suggestive of the Classical Revival style popular in Texas during the early 20th century. A projecting 2- tiered portico a t the south end of the porch marks the entry bay. Fenestration includes a single doorway with transom and double-hung wood sash with 1/1 lights. Polygonal projecting bays on the side (north) elevation alleviate the regular massing. Along with the complex roofscape of steeply pitched hipped and gable roof forms, these features are more typica l of Victorian-er a dwellings. Interior corbelled chimneys of buff-colored brick extend from the north and south slopes of the hipped roof. Modest changes that do not adversely affect the dwelling's historic integrity include a 2- story addition on the rear (west) elevation and installation of metal awnings over the windows and the entry bay of the porch.1 DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping 1.3 If the property had a grassy, open front lawn when constructed, maintain that context. Do not replace the lawn with paving or gravel. The proposed pool and surrounding deck and fenced area do not maintain the landmarked building’s landscape context. 2. Walls and fences 2.4 If constructing a new street-side fence or site wall, design it so that the materials, style, and scale are compatible with and differentiated from the architectural style and period of the building and are in keeping with historic fence styles …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Janet Salazar <c Wednesday, June 8, 2022 11:49 AM Allen, Amber Re: 3909 Avenue G. Questions > Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi Amber, Attached below are photos showing the front yard and fence line as well as some inspiration photos of the privacy bushes we will be installing which will cover the view of the pool from the street. Please let me know if this works! 1
12'-6" 12'-0" 2'-11" 57'-2" 4'-9" 5'-8" 6'-4" 8'-10" 14'-6" 4'-7" 6'-11" 1'-0" NEW FENCING LINE BARK MULCH 75 SF BARK MULCH 15 SF HORIZONTAL WOOD SLAT FENCE " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 1 - ' 4 " 0 - ' 3 " 7 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 0 - ' 2 " 2 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 9 " 2 - ' 1 " 0 1 - ' 9 " 1 - ' 7 RESIDENCE (E) BARK MULCH 265 SF DECOMPOSED GRANITE 200 SF BRICK PATIO AND STEPERS 240 SF CONCRETE 80 SF POOL 225 SF TIMBER TECH 250 SF BARK MULCH 675 SF DRIVEWAY (E) BARK MULCH 55 SF LIMESTONE WASHED BRICKS 500 SF BUILDING (E) NATURAL FLAGSTONE 470 SF BUILDING (E) BARK MULCH 35 SF DECOMPOSED GRANITE 210 SF STONE STEP (E) " 6 - ' 6 2 " 8 - ' 4 " 3 - ' 5 " 5 - ' 4 2 " 4 - ' 7 1 " 0 - ' 2 2 10'-7" 9'-10" 23'-0" 24'-2" 20'-3" 23'-4" 10'-8" 1'-2" 1'-2" 1 5 7 8 7 , X T , n i t s u A G e u n e v A 9 0 9 3 i e c n e d s e R n a h a l l a C DIMENSIONS + MATERIALS PLAN BACK YARD DATE: 04/19/2022 SCALE: SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 24" x 36" sheet N SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 0 8' 16' ATTENTION LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR: IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS DESIGN, OR TO LEARN MORE ABOUT WORKING WITH YARDZEN, PLEASE CONTACT PROS@YARDZEN.COM. NOTE: PLANS ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL AND ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084891 RAYMOND-MORLEY HOUSE 510 BAYLOR STREET B.8 – 1 PROPOSAL Rehabilitate house, add guardrails to upper floors, reconstruct rear additions, add shed roofs to rear doorway. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair deteriorated elements, replacing in-kind where deteriorated beyond repair, at all elevations: a. Repair original wood windows and screens. Do not replace shutters. b. Replace roof with either asphalt shingles or standing-seam metal. c. Repair fascia, frieze, scrollwork, siding, and other wood elements by consolidation, adding dutchmen, etc. Replace in-kind where deteriorated beyond repair. Repaint. d. Reconstruct deteriorated portions of rear additions where damaged beyond repair, reusing wood where possible. e. Remove paint from limestone and repair significant cracks with Cathedral Stone repair products. f. Repair damaged mortar and repaint previously painted brick only. g. Install gutters and downspouts, investigating existing internal gutter system’s viability. a. Replace upper balustrade with balustrade based on 1974 photo. Install at original height, using metal rod to achieve required code height and spacing. Remove lower gallery balustrade and regrade/replant below. 2) East (main) elevation: b. Replace stair handrail. c. Repair and repaint screen door. 3) North elevation: a. Create accessible entrance by removing stops from door. b. Remove sealant at brick joints. Remove inappropriate mortar at gable joint and repair diagonal cracking at windows. c. Reopen infilled window opening and install new wood window to match existing. 4) West (rear) elevation: a. Install salvaged rubble skirting to hide new concrete piers. b. Stabilize and fill cistern. c. Install new concrete steps with metal guards and handrails. d. Install shed roofs, supported by metal columns, over doorways. e. Install new door and security lighting. 5) South elevation a. Install new crawlspace hatch doors. b. Remove double doors and steps at rear addition, replacing with window at first floor. Replace second-floor window. c. Deconstruct stairs. Install new stairs, roof, and handrails to match west elevation. d. Replace missing soffit. e. Remove guardrail from lower porch, then regrade and replant. ARCHITECTURE From the building’s 1974 National Register nomination: Originally, the Raymond-Morley House was symmetrical across the east front with a double central door flanked by two [full-height] windows...A slight projection on the rear of the north part provided space for the original stairs. The front doors opened onto a central hall with two transomed doorways opening onto a single room on either side…The Austin buff brick, …
P U P U P U N D / / N 2 2 0 1 . 2 5 . 3 0 RAYMOND - MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION PROJECT ADDRESS: 510 BAYLOR AUSTIN, TEXAS 78703 PROJECT NUMBER: 202122 PROJECT ISSUE DATE: 10 JUNE 2022 LOCATION MAP CONSTRUCTION LOCATION : 2 2 1 2 0 2 R E B M U N T C E J O R P I I I N O T A T L B A H E R E S U O H Y E L R O M - D N O M Y A R INDEX OF SHEETS A001 A002 AD100 AD101 AD102 AD103 AD104 AS101 A101 A102 A103 A104 A201 A202 A402 A501 A601 S001 S002 S101 S102 S103 M000 M001 M002 M003 M101 M102 M301 M401 M402 M501 M502 M601 S104 E000 E001 E002 E003 ED101 ED102 ES101 E101 E102 E201 E202 E401 E501 E601 P000 P001 P002 PD101 PD102 P101 P102 P201 P202 P401 P501 P502 P601 ABBREVIATIONS & GENERAL NOTES ACCESSIBILTY NOTES DEMO - ARCHITECTURAL SITE DEMO - GROUND LEVEL - FLOORPLAN DEMO - LEVEL 2 - FLOORPLAN DEMO - GROUND LEVEL - RCP DEMO - LEVEL 2 - RCP ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLANS GROUND LEVEL RCP LEVEL 2 RCP EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS INTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SCHEDULES AND DOOR & FRAME ELEVATIONS STRUCTURAL NOTES STRUCTURAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOUNDATION PLAN CEILING & FLOOR FRAMING PLAN ROOF FRAMING PLAN MECHANICAL GENERAL NOTES MECHANICAL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS MECHANICAL PLAN - GROUND LEVEL MECHANICAL PLAN - LEVEL 2 MECHANICAL SECTIONS MECHANICAL SCHEDULES MECHANICAL SCHEDULES MECHANICAL DETAILS MECHANICAL DETAILS MECHANICAL CONTROLS FOUNDATION & FRAMING DETAILS ELECTRICAL GENERAL NOTES ELECTRICAL LEGEND ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN - GROUND LEVEL ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION PLAN - LEVEL 2 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - GROUND LEVEL ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL 2 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - GROUND LEVEL ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - LEVEL 2 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES ELECTRICAL DETAILS ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES PLUMBING SPECIFICATIONS PLUMBING SPECIFICATIONS PLUMBING DEMOLITION PLAN - GROUND LEVEL PLUMBING DEMOLITION PLAN - LEVEL 2 PLUMBING WASTE & VENT PLAN - GROUND LEVEL PLUMBING WASTE & VENT PLAN - LEVEL 2 PLUMBING DOMESTIC WATER PLAN - GROUND LEVEL PLUMBING DOMESTIC WATER PLAN - LEVEL 2 PLUMBING SCHEDULES PLUMBING DETAILS PLUMBING DETAILS PLUMBING RISERS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THIS DOCUMENT IS …
RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION EAST ELEVATION (BAYLOR STREET) SOUTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION OBLIQUE SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS – AREA OF NEW STAIRS AND WOOD STRUCTURE REPAIR WEST ELEVATION RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION NORTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) W. 6TH ST. NORTH ELEVATION (PARTIAL) W. 6TH ST. RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION DAMAGE TO STRUCTURE AND DECKING OF UPPER GALLERY INTERIOR DAMAGE TO BE REPAIRED – TYPICAL AT WINDOWS AND BASEBOARDS RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION SW SILL, DECK, STRUCTURE AND WALL DAMAGE – TYPICAL WEST WOODEN STRUCTURE FOUNDATION DAMAGE – SOUTH WEST CORNER RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION SEALANT AND INAPPROPRIATE MORTAR TO BE REMOVED AT HISTORIC BRICK ADDITION DETERIORATED WOOD INFILL ON WEST. NEW WINDOWS AND SCREENS TO MATCH EXISTING RAYMOND – MORLEY HOUSE REHABILITATION HISTORIC PHOTO CIRCA 1974
WPX LED Wall Packs Catalog Number Notes Type Specifications u w D ---- L :::c: <( B Front View Side View Luminaire Height (H) Width (W) Depth (D) WPX1 WPX2 WPX3 8.1” (20.6 cm) 9.1” (23.1 cm) 9.5” (24.1 cm) 11.1” (28.3 cm) 12.3” (31.1 cm) 13.0” (33.0 cm) 3.2” (8.1 cm) 4.1” (10.5 cm) 5.5” (13.7 cm) Side Conduit Location A 4.0” (10.3 cm) 4.5” (11.5 cm) 4.7” (12.0 cm) B 0.6” (1.6 cm) 0.7” (1.7 cm) 0.7” (1.7 cm) Weight 6.1 lbs (2.8kg) 8.2 lbs (3.7kg) 11.0 lbs (5.0kg) Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. Introduction The WPX LED wall packs are energy-efficient, cost- effective, and aesthetically appealing solutions for both HID wall pack replacement and new construction opportunities. Available in three sizes, the WPX family delivers 1,550 to 9,200 lumens with a wide, uniform distribution. The WPX full cut-off solutions fully cover the footprint of the HID glass wall packs that they replace, providing a neat installation and an upgraded appearance. Reliable IP66 construction and excellent LED lumen maintenance ensure a long service life. Photocell and emergency egress battery options make WPX ideal for every wall mounted lighting application. Ordering Information EXAMPLE: WPX2 LED 40K MVOLT DDBXD Series WPX1 LED P1 WPX1 LED P2 WPX2 LED WPX3 LED Color Temperature Voltage Options Finish 1,550 Lumens, 11W 1 2,900 Lumens, 24W 6,000 Lumens, 47W 9,200 Lumens, 69W 30K 40K 50K 3000K 4000K 5000K MVOLT 347 120V - 277V 347V 3 (blank) E4WH E14WC PE None Emergency battery backup, CEC compliant (4W, 0ºC min) 2 Emergency battery backup, CEC compliant (14W, -20ºC min) 2 Photocell 3 Dark bronze DDBXD DWHXD White Black DBLXD Note : For other options, consult factory. Note: The lumen output and input power shown in the ordering tree are average representations of all configuration options. Specific values are available on request. NOTES 1. All WPX wall packs come with 6kV surge protection standard, except WPX1 LED P1 package which comes with 2.5kV surge protection standard. Add SPD6KV option to get WPX1 LED P1 with 6kV surge protection. Sample nomenclature: WPX1 LED P1 40K MVOLT SPD6KV DDBXD 2. Battery pack options only available on WPX1 and WPX2. 3. Battery pack options not available with 347V and PE options. FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The WPX LED wall packs are designed to provide a cost-effective, energy-efficient solution for the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084150 TRAVIS HEIGHTS - FAIRVIEW PARK 1706 ALTA VISTA AVENUE C.10 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a single-family house and a pool on a vacant lot. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new building is two and one-half stories in height. Its compound gabled, side-gabled, hipped, and shed roof is clad with tile; flat roof elements are built-up asphalt. The building’s exterior is stucco. Fenestration includes arched undivided fixed windows of varying sizes, undivided casement windows, an arched front door inset in an arched loggia, and full-height sliding glass doors. The building’s multiple balconies are enclosed with metal guardrails. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new building is set back approximately 25 feet from the primary streetscape. 2. Orientation The proposed building is oriented toward the primary streetscape. Its attached garage is located on a secondary façade. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale, massing, and height appear significantly larger, more massive, and higher than surrounding contributing buildings; however, its front loggia may help to mitigate height differences. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions, overall, are not compatible with the surrounding district. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s Mediterranean elements do not appear on neighboring contributing buildings. 6. Roofs The proposed building’s complex roofline is not appropriate for the district. 7. Exterior walls The proposed stucco coating is somewhat appropriate for the district, but nearby contributing buildings are generally clad with horizontal wood siding. 8. Windows and doors The proposed arched and undivided fenestration is at odds with contributing buildings’ windows and doors. 9. Porches The proposed loggia helps to break up the building’s massing and provides a step-up to the upper floors, but it is not consistent with porch designs elsewhere in the district. 10. Chimneys The proposed building does not include a boxed chimney. 11. Attached garages and carports The proposed garage is located on a secondary elevation; however, it will front on Fairmount Avenue, since the lot is on a corner. Summary The project does not meet most of the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release plans. C.10 – 2 LOCATION MAP …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084107 WILLOW-SPENCE 1004 SPENCE STREET C.11 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish existing ADU and construct a new ADU and pool house. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed ADU is two stories and clad in a mix of concrete wall panels and 3-coat stucco with a flat metal roof. The pool house is one story, clad in a mix of concrete wall panels and 3-coat stucco with a flat metal roof. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed structures are located at the rear of the lot, behind the contributing house. 2. Orientation The proposed structures’ orientations match the orientation of contributing buildings and outbuildings in the district. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed structures are located behind the two-story primary house. Neither the proposed ADU nor the pool house appear obtrusive. 4. Proportions The proposed structures’ proportions are compatible with surrounding buildings. 5. Design and style Though the proposed building’s overall design is somewhat incompatible with the surrounding district, its position at the rear of the lot renders its overall impact minimal. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roofs are not compatible with the main house. 7. Exterior walls The proposed cement panels and stucco siding are compatible with the main house. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fixed windows and fully glazed doors are mostly incompatible. Summary The project meets some of the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The primary building contributes to the Willow-Spence National Register district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release the plans. Approve the demolition permit. LOCATION MAP C.11 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.11 – 3 Applicant, 2022
CAUTION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY ONLY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PROJECT. SET ISSUE DRAWN BY PROJECT 6/8/22 | Schematic Design at Spence Street ADU 1004 Spence Street Austin TX 78702 DRAWING TITLE YARD VIEW T E E R T S E C N E P S ' 0 9 . 3 9 E " 1 0 6 3 ° 9 1 N ' Picnic Area FRIDGE 2 n d L e v e l T e r r a c e Main House (not in scope) Back Porch Scope of Work t k c a b e S r a e R ' 0 1 t k c a b e S r a e R ' 5 2-Story ADU over Garage UP D / W Rolling Gate ' 0 9 . 3 9 W " 0 0 0 0 ° 0 2 N ' Y E L L A Permeable Surface 1-Story Pool House Roof Side Yard Pool 5' Building Setback k c a b e S t t n o r F ' 5 2 Low Fence 6' High Fence 5' Building Setback 112' FROM STREET N69°51'22"W 129.94' CAUTION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND MAY ONLY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS PROJECT. SET ISSUE DRAWN BY PROJECT DRAWING TITLE 6/8/22 | Schematic Design at Spence Street ADU 1004 Spence Street Austin TX 78702 Schematic Site Plan SITE PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" N T E E R T S E C N E P S ' 0 9 . 3 9 E " 1 0 6 3 ° 9 1 N ' Picnic Area FRIDGE 2 n d L e v e l T e r r a c e Main House (not in scope) Back Porch Scope of Work t k c a b e S r a e R ' 0 1 t k c a b e S r a e R ' 5 2-Story ADU over Garage UP D / W Rolling Gate ' 0 9 . 3 9 W " 0 0 0 0 ° 0 2 N ' Y E L L A Permeable Surface 1-Story Pool House Roof Side Yard Pool 5' Building Setback k c a b e S t t n o r F ' 5 2 Low …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Tuesday, June 28, 2022 9:12 PM HPD Preservation Landmark Case HR22-084107 *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Please prevent the owner of 1004 Spence street from tearing that house down. I am unable to be at the hearing next week but I strongly oppose the demolition of that home as it is lovely and contributes to the character of our little historic district. There is no reason to demolish that home. If she doesn’t want to preserve it she shouldn’t have purchased in the district. I would be happy to buy the house and remodel it! We also have a quite few lovely public pools in the area. I’d be happy to give her a tour. Very truly yours, Stephen Shallcross CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 2 Stephen Shallcross 3
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084067 OLD WEST AUSTIN 3001 OAKMONT BLVD C.12 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish ca. 1946 house and ca. 1972 accessory building and construct a new residence and pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish existing buildings and construct a new residence and pool. The proposed residence has a gabled roof clad in standing-seam metal. Its exterior cladding includes vertical and horizontal wood siding. Fenestration is irregular throughout and includes undivided fixed and casement windows. ARCHITECTURE One-story cross-gabled house with horizontal siding, combination of 6:6 and 8:8 wood windows, and rear single-story garage apartment. RESEARCH The primary building at 3001 Oakmont Blvd was built in 1946. The garage apartment to the rear was built in 1972. Its residents included Dean and Theresa G. Gorham and John B. and Lucy E. Nations. City directory research indicates that John and Lucy Nations lived in the house from 1949-1952. Throughout his stay at 3001 Oakmont Blvd, John Nations was the Director of the State Highway Department’s Equipment and Procurement. City directory research shows that Dean and Theresa Gorham lived in the house from 1955-1959. During this time Dean worked as the director of the Texas Municipal Retirement System. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed residence is located approximately 25’ from Oakmont Blvd and 15’ from W 30th St. 2. Orientation The proposed residence is oriented toward the primary streetscape on Oakmont, the proposed garage fronting on W 30th St, and the pool to the rear of both the proposed residence and garage. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed residence is two stories in height, with complex massing that appears at odds with the relatively simple massing of surrounding buildings. 4. Proportions The proposed residence’s two-story height appears incompatible with nearby contributing buildings. 5. Design and style The proposed residence’s modern style does not appear compatible with surrounding buildings. 6. Roofs The gabled roofline is compatible. 7. Exterior walls The proposed cladding is appropriate. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fenestration is largely inappropriate. 11. Attached garages and carports The proposed garage is appropriate. C.12 – 2 Summary The project does not meet most of …
WEST SOUTH WEST NORTH WEST EXISTING CONDITIONS SOUTH WREN ATELIERHISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW APPLICATION - 3001 OAKMONT BLVD, AUSTIN, TX, 78704 VIEW OF NEW HOME FROM WEST WREN ATELIERHISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW APPLICATION - 3001 OAKMONT BLVD, AUSTIN, TX, 78704 PK NAIL WITH CP&Y WASHER SET OVERHEAD ELECTRIC GUY WIRE (S 22° 51' 20"W ‐ 101.81') " 6 - ' 2 " 6 - ' 7 EP E 1/2" I.D. IRON PIPE POOL 30 X 15 1‐STORY GARAGE FFE=599.5 " 6 - ' 7 1 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 1 1/4" / 1'-0" COA T‐1 APPROACH 5' - 0" ) ' 7 8 . 0 2 1 ‐ E " 0 4 ' 2 0 ° 1 7 S ( TWO‐STORY PROPOSED 1 + 2‐STORY RESIDENCE FFE=599.5 ONE‐STORY 15' - 0" ) ' 2 9 . 1 0 1 ‐ W " 0 4 ' 2 1 ° 3 6 N ( 21.5" PECAN PROPERTY LINE SETBACK T E E R T S H T 0 3 T S E W HALF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE " 0 - ' 5 2 23.5" PECAN 592.86 AT BENCHMARK BENCHMARK 2200207-101 SET CUT SQUARE ON WEST END OF THE STORM DRAIN CURB INLET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST 30TH STREET, 35' +/- EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF OAKMONT BLVD AND WEST 30TH STREET ELEVATION 592.86' (NAVD88 GEOID 12B) (N 18° 57' 20"E ‐ 72.92') W OAKMONT BLVD Δ=81°52'54" R=15.00' L=21.44' CB=N 22°20'45" CD=19.66' H E T U R R O T N WREN ATELIER, LCC SMITH CASA 3001 Oakmont Blvd Austin, Texas 78704 2 0 0 - A W . O N T C E J O R P N A L P E T S I : I N O I T P R C S E D : ) S ( T E E H S E C N E R E F E R : T C E T I H C R A T C E J O R P y j : Y B N W A R D 06.10.2022 BP-1 I t v r . 2 2 R _ A S A C H T M S _ 6 0 6 0 2 2 0 2 \ a s a C h t i m S \ s t n e m u c o D \ r e i l e t a n e r w \ s …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 6, 2022 HR-2022-084095 OLD WEST AUSTIN 1616 NORTHUMBERLAND ROAD C.13 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new house and pool. The existing building was approved for demolition in 2022. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new building is clad in brick veneer and horizontal shiplap. It has an asphalt shingle and metal roof, as well as clad-wood and aluminum windows. It is located approximately 24 feet from the street. It is side-gabled, with an attached one-story front-facing garage. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building is sited approximately 24 feet from the street. 2. Orientation The proposed building’s orientation is consistent with others in the district; however, its front-facing garage is not appropriate. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale, massing, and height appears mostly compatible with the district. 4. Proportions Proportions appear mostly compatible. See 6 and 8. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s design and style are consistent and appear to blend with the surrounding district. 6. Roofs The proposed roof is mostly compatible, though the steep pitch may make the building appear more massive than it is. 7. Exterior walls Proposed cladding appears compatible with the district. 8. Windows and doors Proposed fenestration appears mostly compatible with the district, though a configuration with smaller divided lights would improve compatibility. 10. Chimneys The proposed chimney is not a boxed chimney. 11. Attached garages and carports The proposed front-facing garage does not comply with the design standards. Summary The project meets most of the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on and release plans. LOCATION MAP C.13 – 2
GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL WORK AND MATERIALS IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL CODE(S) AND GUIDELINES OF FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY HAVING JURISDICTION. ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THESE REGULATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED THE SAME AS IF NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS, INCLUDING: INTERNATIONAL 2021 CONSERVATION CODE, 2015 Uniform PLUMBING CODE, 2015 Uniform MECHANICAL CODE, 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AND THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE WITH STATE AND LOCAL AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION. RESIDENTIAL IF THE CONTRACTOR ASCERTAINS AT ANY TIME THAT REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CONTRACT CONFLICTS WITH, OR ARE IN VIOLATION OF, APPLICABLE LAWS, CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES, HE SHALL NOT PROCEED WITH WORK IN QUESTION, EXCEPT AT HIS OWN RISK, UNTIL ARCHITECT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED IN WRITING AND WRITTEN DETERMINATION IS MADE BY ARCHITECT. WHERE COMPLETED OR PARTIALLY COMPLETED WORK IS DISCOVERED TO BE IN VIOLATION WITH APPLICABLE LAWS, CODES, REGULATIONS AND/OR ORDINANCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE THAT WORK FROM THE PROJECT AND REPLACE WITH ALL NEW COMPLYING WORK AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PUBLIC PROTECTION AS REQUIRED PER GOVERNING AGENCY AND CODE REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ANY TEMPORARY SHORING AND BRACING TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION FOR SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, CURBS, GUTTERS, STREETLIGHTS, EASEMENTS, UTILITIES, FENCES, SIGNS, BARRICADES, ETC. ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY, AND SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL WORK. NOISE, DUST, DIRT, FIRE HAZARDS AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS CAUSED BY SUCH CONSTRUCTIONS. PROPERTY AND PREMISE LINES ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR AND A SURVEY REPORT SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION. FUTURE OWNER IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRE SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITS. THIS DOCUMENT, THE IDEAS, AND THE DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT AND IS NOT TO BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE ARCHITECT. LARGER SCALE DRAWINGS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER THOSE OF SMALLER SCALE. WHERE DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND THOSE OF OTHER CONSULTANTS, THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GENERALLY BE ASSUMED TO GOVERN. DIMENSIONS SHALL HAVE PREFERENCE OVER SCALE. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. IN NEW CONSTRUCTION SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL RECEIVE THEIR PRIMARY POWER …
