10.2 - 1501 E 12th St - Southgate-Lewis - Elevation — original pdf
Backup
All documents
11.0 - 2 Green Lanes — original pdf
11.0 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 6, 2025 HR-2025-070336 GRAVES HOUSE 2 GREEN LANES PROPOSAL Expand a second-floor addition and construct a housing unit. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a larger second floor space on a non-original side addition. 2) Construct a housing unit at the rear of the property, detached from the historic building. 3) Repair and rebuild retaining wall at the front of the property where necessary. ARCHITECTURE The Graves House is a 1938 Colonial Revival House designed by local architect H.F. Kuehne in the Old West Austin Historic District. Original drawings show a main symmetrical house with a center door along with a garage wing with a two-car garage and second floor featuring dormer windows above it. Later alterations saw a second floor constructed above the garage that eliminated the dormers and created a front facing gable, which is the current appearance. The main house has remained largely the same, with the center door bracketed by columns and shuttered windows. The second-floor features three windows matching those below. Exterior cladding is brick, and the main house has a side gabled roof clad in composition shingle. At the rear, a sunroom is present and in the original drawings, though the sunroom’s windows appear different and may have been replaced. The Graves House was designated historic by the City of Austin in 2004. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location Addition is located at the side and rear of the original building, behind the garage wing. At the second floor, the addition will be set over the existing garage. 2. Scale, massing, and height The addition is an expansion of one corner of the first floor only, and the appearance is keeping with several projecting rooms at the rear of the buildings, such as at the sunroom extension at the southeast corner. The wraparound porch will be minimally visible from the front of the house. 3. Design and style Details of the second-floor porch are simple and compatible with the main house. Two glazed doorways will open to the porch but appear simple and centered on the addition. 4. Roofs The roof is proposed to be a …
11.1 - 2 Green Lanes - Drawings & Renderings — original pdf
V W W W ELM 14" P P 117.42' ELM 19" P P P GREEN LANE P P P P ELM 21" ELM 13" P P P P P P P P ELM 20" S87° 13' 50" E ELM 15" ELM 11" ELM 19" ELM 19" ELM 8" K C A B T E ELM 16" D S R A E Y " - SID ELM 13" 0 5'- STONE WALL; TO BE DEMOLISHED LOOSE STONES IN SOIL TO BE DEMOLISHED; 548 SF ELM 14" STONE WALL; DEMO PRESSURE TANL 25' - 0" FRONT SETBACK ELM 15" STONE; TO BE REMOVED 623 SF STONE WALL; DEMO LIVE OAK 11" ELM 14" ELM 14" ELM 21" ELM 9" 591.4' " 0 - ' 0 4 590.7' ELM 17" 588.4' CENTERLINE OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 586.4' 0' 9.8 5 3 CVRD. PORCH; TO BE DEMOLISHED 465 SF STONE WALL BRICK RUNNER LIVE OAK 13" BRICKS ON SOIL; TO BE REMOVED; 719 SF EX.TWO STORY BRICK HOUSE DN SOIL LIVE OAK 16" LIVE OAK 16" LIVE OAK 23" 580.7' ELM 15" CONC; 121SF ELM 23" ELM 13" ELM 9" ELM 19" WOOD SHACK; TO BE REMOVED 64 SF LIVE OAK 13" LIVE OAK 39" HICKORY 11" STONE BUILDING; 125 SF H W H W STONE WALL ELM 9" MOUNTAIN LAUREL 8" D E V O M E ; E R 0 S E F O N O B 5 1 4 S T T STONE WALL ELM 12" ELM 11" H W H W HW STONE; 500 SF ELM 8" STONE WALL ELM 15" HW HW HW HW HW ELM 15" ELM 8" ELM 8" 572.6' E " 7 5' 1 ° 4 6 1 N STONE; 286 SF LACEY OAK 8" 564.3' ELM 17" ELM 8" CREPE MYRTLE 8" A/C 12SF K C A B T E D S R A E Y " - SID 0 5'- X 589.2' " 0 - ' 0 4 585.9' LACEY OAK 23" " 0 - ' 0 4 STONE WALL 581.5' " 0 - ' 0 4 563.6' ELM 14" " 0 - ' 0 4 7 " W 9' 1 ° 1 6 1 S 553.0' SITE NOTES & TREE PROTECTION 555.7' LACEY 15" ELM 10" ELM 9" LIVE OAK 22" ELM 8" WOOD BRIDGE; 47 SF ELM 13" ELM 8" ELM 9" ZIPLINE WOOD DECK; 90 SF 1. CONTRACTOR TO ASSURE THAT …
12.0 - 609 Congress Ave — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 6, 2025 SB-2025-085188 CONGRESS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT 609 CONGRESS AVENUE 12.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Install a sign. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a 51 square foot sign on the front of a two-story building in a historic district. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin Signage Guidelines are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: New Signage 1. Number of signs Proposal is for one sign for a single tenant. 2. Sign types Application details an awning sign, which is a typology allowed by signage guidelines. 3. Sign size Proposed sign is just over 50 square feet in size. Awning signs are allowed to be the lesser of 8 square feet or 20% of the awning panel, which this proposal far exceeds. However, it is noted that the sign it proposes to replace is a similar size and its permit was approved in 2010. 4. Sign design, coloring and materials The design is simple and uses less than three colors. There is a black block with lettering as well as individual standalone lettering on the left half of the assembly. 5. Lettering Two typefaces are used, one of which is stylized to fit the brand of the tenant. It does not appear as too contemporary, however. 6. Lighting Documentation indicates that the sign will be lit internally. Historic sign guidelines state that internally lit cabinet signs are specifically prohibited within historic districts. 8. Sign placement Sign is placed near entrance, above the minimum required height, and centered on the awning. 9. Sign mounting It is assumed that the proposed sign will reuse the mounting elements or locations of the previous sign, which was installed in the same area. Summary The project [meets / does not meet / meets some of] the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Congress Avenue National Register district. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the sign’s size, given the previously installed signage in the same location. Do not approve internal lighting design and request indirect lighting.
12.1 - 609 Congress Ave - Drawings & Material Specifications — original pdf
White 1/8th Thick Acrylic with Vinyl overlay
13.0 - 1210 W 12th St — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 6, 2025 PR-2025-061450; GF-2025-064676 WEST LINE HISTORIC DISTRICT 1210 WEST 12TH STREET 13.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1949 contributing house. ARCHITECTURE Built in the early postwar period like many of its neighbors, the house at 1210 West 12th Street is simple in its single-story form but does feature Classical Revival elements, including a projecting pediment covering a front porch and original multi- lite windows. The foundation is elevated slightly above grade, which adds visual importance to the front porch and entry. At this porch, there is a single front door to one side and a small circular window to the other. Aside from the pedimented front gable, the roof is a side gable set at a moderate pitch. The wall is clad in horizontal wood siding that appears original. Together, these elements create an image of a house that has not been modified since original construction and retains excellent integrity. RESEARCH The first owners of the property after construction of the existing house were Lydia and Queenie Littman. Lydia Littman moved to Austin when she was a child, and, after graduating from the University of Texas, worked at a real estate company upon completion of further education and training newly available in the city. She became very successful in this field and became involved in various community groups. By the time she purchased the house on West 12th Street in her 70s, had her own business in real estate, loans, and investments. Upon semi-retirement around the same time, she continued to work out of her home office until her passing at the age of 92. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the West Line National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of postwar architecture with Classical Revival elements. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant …
13.1 - 1210 W 12th St - Photos — original pdf
Backup
15.0 - 1703 Alameda Dr — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 6, 2025 PR-2025-029950; GF-2025-033059; HR-2025-056344 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1703 ALAMEDA DRIVE 15.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1939 house and construct a residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish the existing one-story house, which contributes to the National Register district. Construct a two-story house in generally the same location on the lot. ARCHITECTURE Built in a simple, minimal traditional form, the house at 1703 Alameda Drive is set at grade slightly above the street on a pier-and-beam foundation with a concrete skirt. Due to elevation at the site, the crawlspace is much higher at the front of the house than at the rear, where it sits nearly at-grade. The house is nearly rectangular in plan with a small front porch cutout at one corner, which is accessed from a stair leading to a front walkway. It is clad in horizontal wood siding at all exterior walls, and original screens are present at the four front windows as well as at the side, along with a screen door at the rear of the porch as the primary entryway. Windows are typically paired or arranged in three units, side-by-side. There is minimal overhang from the hipped roof, which is clad in composition shingle. Overall, the house is in intact condition when viewed from the street, with minimal alterations apparent. RESEARCH After construction around 1939, the house was first owned by Hiram & Doris Brown, who worked at local businesses such as Texas Cleaners & Shoe Repair. The Browns owned the property through World War II, and shortly after was sold to Charles & Bertha Kinney. Charles Kinney worked as a salesman and Bertha worked for many years as a clerk at the Internal Revenue Service. For a time, their adult son lived with them while attending the University of Texas. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location Proposed construction is generally on the same footprint as the existing house and matches setback to other houses on the street. 2. Orientation The proposed residence is oriented towards the street, like the existing house and neighbors on the same street. 3. Scale, massing, and height Generally, …
15.1 - 1703 Alameda Dr - Updated Drawings — original pdf
1703 Alameda Goal • The owners are seeking approval for demolition to transform the property to better suit their needs and those of their aging family members. • They are committed to meeting the design standards and Alameda’s characteristics/influence • As the existing structure lacks “strong architectural elements”, we propose a solution that will: • Complement the district’s aesthetic and heritage • While meeting the homeowners’ functional needs Response to questions posed at ARC • Comment made: • Design/Exterior Materials: • Questions about consistency and appropriateness in the historic setting. • Observed that the design appears to take inspiration from a new neighboring house (stucco), rather than fitting the established character of the street. • Response • Updated with Craftsman-style elements and inspiration from the current house, reflecting the design principles of the Arts and Crafts period prevalent on Alameda Street • Mixed Materials: Combination of Sidings and Natural Wood • Decorative Trim: Board and Batten & Horizontal Siding with a lower siding detail to reflect the porch railing of the craftsman style • Decorative Brackets • Low Pitched Gabled Roof with large overhanging eaves • Inset Porches • Large Grouped Windows 1703 Alameda Dr – Updated Elevations 1703 Alameda Dr – Updated Elevations 1703 Alameda Dr – Rough Rendering 1703 Alameda Dr – Rough Rendering Response to questions posed at ARC • Comment made: • Garage Placement and Grade Issues: • Response • Visitability main living area was the primary focus • 5’ elevation gain (526’-532’) in the house footprint • Combination of excavation in the back yard to help reduce the overall height of the house and grading in the front of the house to help blend the driveway to the natural grade will be used • Concerns about the garage being set lower relative to the main floor, producing a split-level effect. • Questions about the site plan's handling of natural grade and the garage's elevation, with some confusion based on the submitted drawings. Area of Excavation Roughly 4’ of Elevation Change Influencing Contributing Houses on Alameda St 1507 Alameda Dr Contributing 1517 Alameda Dr Contributing 1809 Alameda Dr Contributing Response to questions posed at ARC • Comment made: • Suggestions included reconsidering the prominent arch (possibly removing it or replacing with a framed opening) to help scale and reduce visual disjunction. • Response • Replaced with an inset Craftsman-style porch for improved proportionality. • Removed imposing …
16.0 - 705 Brownlee Cir — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 6, 2025 PR-2025-062597 WEST LINE HISTORIC DISTRICT 705 BROWNLEE CIRCLE 16.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a multi-unit residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a three-unit residential building. The previous building on the property was listed as non-contributing to the historic district and not reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The setback of the proposed construction is similar to the non-contributing resource that has been approved for demolition. It is also similar to other houses on the block and is located on a curved section of street to allow any variation in setback to blend. 2. Orientation Consisting of four units, there is not a cohesive main entry that can be described as facing the street. 3. Scale, massing, and height The property and street are set on a sloping elevation. To that end, the two-stories above grade as proposed do not project substantially higher than neighbors on the block. The massing of the proposed structure creates the appearance of the second floor being offset from the main floor, creating a very modern look that stands out from surrounding contributing properties. 4. Proportions While this block of houses does feature varying forms and sizes of houses, the proposed design for this lot is very different from all others, especially those contributing properties. 5. Design and style The overall design of this new construction is a departure from its neighbors specifically and the district generally, which does make it distinct from surrounding contributing properties. No historic architectural styles are being emulated, and materials are generally modern or presented in a modern layout or assembly. 6. Roofs Roof form is not simple, though there are few crickets or penetrations proposed. Due to numerous rooftop decks, a sloped roof only appears at the front elevation. Some sort of standing seam metal is proposed, which is compatible with the modern design of the rest of the house. This material is common enough (if not original) on buildings in the area. 7. Exterior walls Exterior walls will be metal and brick in material. The brick is appropriate for the neighborhood, but modern metal …
16.1 - 705 Brownlee Cir - Drawings — original pdf
05/08/2025 BRWN NEW 4-UNIT RESIDENCE 705 Brownlee Circle Austin Texas 78703 U.S.A. CDPROC 49 May 14, 2025 e.g. CDPROC25April 03 2025SCOPE (NEW, RENOVATION, ADDITION)BRWN705 Brownlee Circle Austin Texas 78703 U.S.A. VICINITY MAP y p x c E a P o M 705 BROWNLEE CIRCLE, AUSTIN, TX 78703,EE.UU R O D L F WIN W Cesar Chavez St C OLO R A D O RIVE R LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT ADDRESS: 705 Brownlee Circle Austin Texas 78703 U.S.A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 32 OF PARK VIEW, VOLUME 5, PAGE 69, PLAT RECORDS, TRAVIS CO.,TX DESCRIPTION OF WORK: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING DUPLEX AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 4-UNIT RESIDENCE OWNER'S NAME: BRAD HOSKINS & MELISSA SKIDMORE E N FIE L D R D W 15th St D LV R B A M A N L PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS ARCHITECT WEBBER + STUDIO 1220 LAVACA ST AUSTIN, TX 78701 512-236-1032 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FORT STRUCTURES 2120 E 7th ST. STE 200 Austin, TX 78702 MECHANICAL ENGINEER FRESH AIR SIZING 3306 DALTON ST AUSTIN, TX 78745 512-466-7679 ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING ENGINEER S3 INGENIEROS KPMG BUILDING L2 ESCAZU, COSTA RICA +506-4020-2342 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER HOLT ENGINEERING, INC. 2220 BARTON SKYWAY AUSTIN, TX 78704 512-447-8166 W Cesar Chavez St y w L H A N GIO E R R E T IN WATERPROOFIING CONSULTANT ACTON PARTNERS P.O. BOX 203663 AUSTIN, TX 78720-3663 CIVIL ENGINEER TBD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TBD INTERIOR DESIGNER TBD CONTRACTOR/BUILDER TBD SHEET INDEX ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT G001 G001 G002 G002 G003 G003 G004 G004 G005 G005 G006 G006 G100 G100 G101 G101 G102 G102 G103 G103 G104 G104 G105 G106 G106 G107 G107 D001 G201 D101 D001 D102 D101 SP101 D102 SP102 SP101 SP103 SP102 A100 SP103 A101 A100 A102 A101 A103 A102 A110 A103 A111 A110 A112 A111 A113 X111 A114 A112 A120 A113 A121 A114 A122 A120 A123 A121 A129 A122 A200 A123 A201 A129 A202 A130 A300 A131 A301 A132 A302 A133 A303 A134 A304 A200 A305 A201 A306 A202 A307 A300 A308 A301 A309 A302 A310 A303 A311 A304 A312 A305 A313 A306 A501 A307 A502 A308 A503 A309 A504 A310 A505 A311 A506 A401 A601 A402 A602 A403 A603 A404 A604 A405 A606 A406 A700 A407 A701 A408 SC100 A409 SC101 A410 SC102 A411 SC103 A412 SC104 A413 A414 A501 A502 A503 A504 A505 A506 A510 A520 COVER SHEET COVER SHEET PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY INFORMATION EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS …
17.0 - 1804 Alta Vista Ave — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 6, 2025 PR-2025-079069 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1804 ALTA VISTA AVENUE 17.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a residence on a vacant lot. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a three-story house on a sloping lot in the Travis Heights neighborhood. The lot has historically been vacant and has recently been subdivided from a neighbor. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed setback from the street is around 34 feet, which is slightly further back than contributing properties on the block. However, this is due to a heritage tree in the front of the property and the required distance from the critical root zone. 2. Orientation The front of the house faces the street, like other contributing buildings. Due to grade changes on site, the front walk from the street becomes an elevated walkway when it reaches the front porch. 3. Scale, massing, and height Though the building is described as three-stories, the lowest floor is entirely below grade from the front of the lot. When viewed from the street, the proposed house appears to be two floors, set at a decline from the road. Massing is generally simple, with some complexity at the front of the house to fit around the heritage tree mentioned above. 4. Proportions Design of the new construction is compatible with neighboring properties, which are a mix of contributing and non- contributing resources. If only compared to contributing properties, it remains in scale, especially given the elevation changes on site. 5. Design and style No replication of style or false historicism is present in the design. Though the facades have a very modern appearance, it fits with surrounding non-contributing properties on the block, and the setback from the street allows the style to blend with its surroundings due to the muted materials and colors selected. 6. Roofs A single slope roof is present, which is a simple and discreet in form. The slope is to the side and the roof material will not be easily legible from the street. 7. Exterior walls No exterior walls are windowless, and wall cladding above street grade is corrugated siding. Although modern …
17.1 - 1804 Alta Vista Ave - Drawings & Photos — original pdf
PROJECT INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES - SITE PLAN LOT 7 BLOCK 11 TRAVIS HEIGHTS, ON ADDITION IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT OF RECORD THERE OR IN BOOK 3, PAGE 15 PLAT RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. PROPERTY ZONING: SF-3 FAMILY RESIDENCE NP NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN COMBINING DISTRICT 1. 2. CONTRACTOR (GC) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING SITE DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS. VERIFY DIMENSIONS MARKED "V.I.F." PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY INCONSISTENCIES. LOT AREA BUILDING COVERAGE ALLOWABLE BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS COVER PROPOSED GFA ALLOWABLE GFA PROPOSED 6366 SQFT 40% 2,546.4 SQFT 21.3% 1,354 SQFT 32'-0" 31'-3.5" 45% 2,864.7 SQFT 28.7% 1,829 SQFT 2,546.4 SQFT 40% 2,531 SQFT 39.8% 6 1/4" 40' - 0" TENT PORTION 2 HIGH POINT = 551.5' ' 5 4 5 O H \\ \\ EXISTING WOOD FENCE ' . 9 8 4 5 1 3 ' - 6 " 1 6 ' - 0 3 / 4 " O H ' 6 4 5 \ \ O H N 1 6 ° 1 0 5 6 . 5 ' ' 0 1 " E O H ( P L A T 5 6 ) LOT 12 . 1 5 ' ( F . M . ) LINE OF BUILDING 23' - 0 3/4" PROPOSED ROOF OVERHANG 1 0 ' - 0 " R E A R S E T B A C K P E R Z O N I N G PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE ENTRANCE \ \ O H 17' - 8 1/2" H O ' 8 4 5 ' 9 4 5 O H H O ' 7 4 5 ' 1 . 7 4 5 O H ' 1 . 1 5 5 1 Proposed Site Plan SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" . C N . T O E TENT PORTION 1 HIGH POINT = 555.8' C R 40' - 0" L L A W 10' - 0" 8' - 0" 16' - 5 3/4" T0 BUILDING LINE BRIDGE PROJECTION TO ACCESSIBLE BRIDGE Y R A D N U O B Y T R E P O R P W M EXISTING 4" WASTE WATER LINE LOT 8 S 62°46'10" E 114.99' (F.M.) 115.0' (PLAT) PROPOSED ROOF OVERHANG EXISTING CONCRETE RETAINING WALL PROPERTY BOUNDARY ' . 8 5 5 5 WASTE WATER LINE 5'-0" SIDE SETBACK PER ZONING LOW …
18.0 - 2901 Del Curto Rd — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS AUGUST 6, 2025 PR-2025-083770; GF-2025-085752 2901 DEL CURTO RD 18 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1939 house. ARCHITECTURE One- and one-half story stone veneer cottage with hipped roof, exposed rafter tails beneath deep eaves, a stone-veneer chimney, and tiered stone steps at entryway. RESEARCH 2901 Del Curto Road was home to the Castle family for nearly eighty years from 1941 to 2019. Florence and Joseph Castle were prominent musicians and spent much of their lives as popular performers, composers, and music educators in Austin. Both Florence and Joseph Castle had academic degrees in music, an especially uncommon feat for women in the 1930s. The couple moved to Austin in 1939 and quickly established themselves as in-demand performers. Florence Castle was a composer and in-demand teacher of piano and coronet music; Joseph Castle was concertmaster of the University Symphony, worked both as an individual composer and a contributor to multiple musical compilations, and wrote academically on guitar and violin while also instructing University and private students in both instruments. He also performed during the 1940s and ‘50s in multiple country and western groups, gaining statewide recognition, and worked as a piano tuner. An extensive history of the Castles was compiled after Florence Castle’s death by Pat and Mel Oakes for the Congregational Church of Austin, of which the Castles were esteemed members and longtime musical leaders.1 The Castles briefly moved from Austin during World War II and for part of 1953, but always returned to their home in Austin. Joseph Castle died in 1992, and Florence Castle in 2019 at the age of 103. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of a rustic Texas cottage, popular in Austin during the 1930s and 1940s. b. Historical association. The property is associated with musicians and composers Florence and Joseph Castle. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property was not evaluated for its ability to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature …
2.0 - C14H-2025-0022 - Stedman-Graves House, 1701 San Gabriel St — original pdf
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2025-0022 HLC DATE: August 6, 2025 PC DATE: CC Date: APPLICANT: Shana Feste & Brian Kavanaugh-Jones (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Stedman-Graves House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1701 San Gabriel Street, Austin, TX 78701 ZONING CHANGE: SF-3 to SF-3-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant the proposed zoning change from family residence (SF-3) to family residence-historic combining district (SF-3-H) zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Austin Lukes, 512-978-0766 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Neighborhoods Council, City of Austin Downtown Commission, Downtown Austin Alliance, Downtown Austin Neighborhood Assn. (DANA), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Historic Austin Neighborhood Association, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Judges Hill Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, Shoal Creek Conservancy DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2025 Downtown Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the store building as eligible for designation as contributing resource to both a local Judges Hill historic district and a Judges Hill National Register historic district. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: The historic zoning application summarizes the Stedman-Graves house’s architectural significance and historical associations with the Stedman and Graves families, as well as to its local architect as follows: The 1927 Stedman-Graves House merits historic landmark status for its architectural design by prominent Austin architect Edwin Kreisle as a representative of the Colonial Georgian Revival style, and for its importance to the City of Austin as the home of prominent lawyer and judge, Ireland Graves, and of his wife Mary Stedman Graves, who was extremely active in the civic life of Austin. The home continues to serve as a residence in a neighborhood where homes are increasingly utilized as businesses. The Judges Hill Neighborhood Association supports the inclusion of this home into any future City of Austin and/or National Register Historic Districts.1 § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; 1 Allen, Phoebe. “1927 Home of Mary Stedman & Judge Ireland Graves, 1701 San Gabriel Street in Judges Hill.” 2025. represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses …
2.1 - C14H-2025-0022 - Stedman-Graves House - Application — original pdf
City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet General Overview Historic zoning is a zoning overlay which is added to the base zoning of a specific tract of land (for example, CBD-H denotes Central Business District-Historic Zoning). To qualify for City Historic Landmark status, a property must meet the local historic designation criteria (see below). Applicants must submit historical documentation demonstrating how the property meets these criteria (see attached submittal requirements). The Historic Landmark Commission reviews all applications for City Historic Landmark designation, with the Austin City Council making final decisions on these designations. At least three (3) months are typically required to process a City Historic Landmark designation through the City Council once a complete application is received. Once designated, all proposed exterior site and building changes (other than routine maintenance) to a historically zoned tract require advance review and approval by the City Historic Landmark Commission. The Historic Landmark Commission's design standards are available on the Historic Preservation Office website: https://www.austintexas.gov/department/historic-preservation. Landmark properties that are in good repair and in full compliance with the City historic review requirements are eligible to apply annually for a historic property tax exemption. For information on the historic zoning process, refer to Chapter 25-2 of the City Land Development Code. WHERE TO APPLY: To ensure that the application is complete, an advance review by the City Historic Preservation Office is required prior to formal submittal with the Land Use Review Division (https://www.austintexas.gov/department/land-use-review). Preliminary applications may be submitted electronically to preservation@austintexas.gov, at the receptionist’s desk at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive by appointment, or by mail addressed to: City of Austin-PDC Historic Preservation Office PO Box 1088 Austin, TX 78767 Email preservation@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-3393 for an appointment. TIME FRAME FOR PROCESSING HISTORIC ZONING CASES: Each historic zoning case is reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Commission approximately four to six weeks after receipt of application. The Historic Landmark Commission meets once a month, typically on the first Wednesday of each month. The case is then heard by either the Zoning and Platting Commission or the Planning Commission approximately three weeks after the Historic Landmark Commission hearing, and then by the City Council approximately six weeks later. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Refer to Instructions and Submittal Checklist. Complete Application Forms, supplemental materials, and Affidavits. THE FOLLOWING CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK CRITERIA ARE CONSIDERED WHEN REVIEWING A CITY …
2.2 - C14H-2025-0022 - Stedman-Graves House - Additional Photos — original pdf
Backup
2.3 - C14H 2025 0022 - Letter of Recommendation_Redacted — original pdf
Jeff Harper & Mark Seeger 805 West 16th Street Austin, TX 78701 512.784.0013 July 23, 2025 City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Planning Commission City Council Members RE: C14H-2025-0022 - 1701 San Gabriel St – Stedman-Graves House Historic Zoning Honorable Mayor, Councilmembers, and Commissioners: As our elected and appointed officials, we are encouraging your approval of the Historic Zoning application for the Stedman-Graves House located at 1701 San Gabriel St. in the Judges Hill Neighborhood, C14H-2025-0022. Research completed by the applicant demonstrates that: The structure is of a contributing nature architecturally and historically • • Several prominent Austinites have lived in the house • The house is located in one of Austin’s first neighborhoods The Graves homestead has been fortunate to have wonderful stewards. The current owners have preserved and restored the integrity of the structure. They have also been committed to sustaining the beautiful tree canopy and landscape that surrounds the home. The home was built by famed local Austin Architect and builder, Edwin C. Kreisle, also responsible for several other important Austin Landmarks including the Clubhouse at the Lions Municipal Golf Course. The current owners have graciously shared the Stedman- Graves House with the local community during annual 2025 Preservation Austin Homes tour and have demonstrated a commitment to historic preservation. Best regards, Mark Seeger & Jeff Harper, Owners The Historic Granger House and Perch A National, State and City Landmark Property
3.0 - 607 38th St — original pdf
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H- HLC DATE: August 6, 2025 PC DATE: CC Date: APPLICANT: Lisa Vela, Next Level Permits, LLC (commission-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 607 East 38th Street, Austin, TX 78705 ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-CO-NP to SF-3-H-CO-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Do not grant historic zoning, as the property does not meet two criteria for designation. Strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse or relocation, then material salvage and reuse, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Austin Lukes, 512-978-0766 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Neighborhoods Council, CANPAC (Central Austin Neighborhood Plan Area Committee), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Hancock Neighborhood Assn., Homeless Neighborhood Association, North Austin Neighborhood Alliance, Preservation Austin DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2019 Historic Resource Survey of North Loop, Hancock, and Upper Boggy Creek lists the house a medium priority. This survey does not give recommendations for landmark designation. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. Originally built as a side-by-side duplex in the Hancock neighborhood, the property at 607 E. 38th St. is one of the last remaining and most intact examples of this typology in this part of the city. It features wood frame construction clad with lapped teardrop siding with a narrow profile. While many earlier built properties in Hancock, as well as surrounding neighborhoods such as Hyde Park1, were subdivided to house additional tenants during the Great Depression, this house was purpose-built for two units. This is visually apparent by the two equally sized and prominent front doors at the corners of the building, each covered with a modest gable over their respective entries. The house is elevated …
3.1 - 607 E 38th St - Photos — original pdf
DEMO PHOTOS 607 E 38th Street 607 e 38TH Street DEMO PHOTOS
03.2 - 607 E 38th St - Photos — original pdf
607 E 38TH ST ZILLOW LISTING PHOTOS
08.2 - 713 Congress Ave - Paramount Theatre Conditions — original pdf
DLR Group of North Carolina, P.C. a North Carolina corporation 1213 West Morehead Street, Suite 210 Charlotte, NC 28208 March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Assessment and Recommendations Existing Windows and Doors on Congress Avenue Elevation, 2nd and 3rd Floors Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 PART 1: CONDITION ASSESSMENT Areas of Condition Assessment: This report is to assess the condition of the double-hung windows and balcony doors at the second and third floors of the Congress Avenue elevation of the Paramount Theatre in Austin. Figure 1.1: Clip of original 1915 Paramount Theater plans with areas of assessment highlighted. 2 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 1.1 Assessment of Existing Double-hung windows, 2nd and 3rd floors: a) The double hung windows are very possibly original. b) The window glass was shown to be replaced in the 1980 Renovation plans. No other work to the windows was shown in those plans. c) The windows sills are the most degraded and show significant water and sun damage. d) The bottom stile and rails of the bottom sashes are in mediocre condition. e) The putty holding in the glass has previously failed and was not neatly tooled where re-applyed f) All counterweights are broken or removed; most windows are painted shut (only two still open, which are used to access the roof of the marquee). g) The windows are not air-tight and let in drafts of air and dust. h) Exposed lintels above the windows are freshly painted and rust-free. i) Maintenance has included scheduled repainting of the exterior and re-puttying glass as needed. Figure 1.2: .... 3 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 Figure 1.3: Areas of poor condition, exterior Figure 1.4: Interior view of existing windows 4 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 Figure 1.5: Window hardware overpainted; counterweight non-functional Figure 1.6: Windows painted shut; glazing putty untooled 5 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 1.2 Assessment of Existing Balcony Doors,. Pediments, & Transoms, 3rd floor 6 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 7 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 …
03.a - 607 E 38th St - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Robyn Turner Historic Preservation Office Vote NO on demolition of 607 E 38th St Sunday, August 3, 2025 11:07:10 PM [You don't often get email from External Email - Exercise Caution Preservation Board: PLEASE urge the Landmark Commission NOT to approve the demolition permit for 607 E 38th St, a treasured home/duplex with historic roots that have meaning to neighbors and add character to our neighborhood. It should be left as is. VOTE NO on the permit to demolish this historic part of the Hancock Neighborhood and old Austin’s culture and memory. Yours truly, Robyn M Turner 721 Sparks Ave Austin, TX 78705 Hancock resident CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
03.b - 607 E 38th St - public comment — original pdf
Barbara Epstein 701 Texas Ave Austin TX 78705 - - 4 August 2025 Landmark Commission (by email) Re: Case No. PR-2025-041615 – 607 E. 38th St. Dear Sirs: This letter is written in in support of granting historic status to 607 E. 38th St. which you have already initiated, and to oppose a demolition permit because this property meets two of the five standards necessary for such historic designation: its unique design, built originally as a duplex in a Craftsman style and its architectural contribution to a gateway street to a largely intact period neighborhood. Even a modest home can be historic in design and contribute to the character of a street and an entire neighborhood. Sincerely, Barbara Epstein
03.c - 607 E 38th St - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Scott Brown Historic Preservation Office 607 E 38th Street Tuesday, August 5, 2025 9:43:07 AM image001.png External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern, I am writing again to urge the commission to deny the demolition permit request for 607 E 38th Street. Neighborhoods like Hancock are a vital link between Austin’s past and its future, and when wonderful original homes and duplexes are demolished we lose that connectivity to the city’s history. This duplex is in good shape, is attractive, and appropriate for the neighborhood. Please don’t let the owners tear it down and build who-knows-what. Thanks very much, Scott Brown 700 Texas Ave - Scott Brown President CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
15.2 - 1703 Alameda - presentation addendum — original pdf
1703 Alameda Addendum ARC Meeting – Responses • Gable roof consideration • Lower Renderings height to better represent street level views Garage Gable Roof Consideration • Garage Gable • 13’ Height at 25’ Setback Existing Design • Garage • 10’ Height at 25’ Setback
16.a - 705 Brownlee Circle - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Ellen Justice Historic Preservation Office; HR 2025.075283 - 705 Brownlee Circle Tuesday, August 5, 2025 9:27:06 AM [You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important at / . / ] External Email - Exercise Caution Ellen Justice 802 Winflo Drive Austin, TX 78703 I have received the hearing notice only TODAY and the hearing is TOMORROW. I hope this email will establish that I OBJECT to the plans for 705 Brownlee Circle. Yes, we are a historic neighborhood, but more importantly we do not have the infrastructure to support such a large influx of residents. Even though we are near a bus line, it is very likely that this number of residents will put many more cars on our streets. No no no! Ellen Justice Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.b - 705 Brownlee Circle - public comment — original pdf
Backup
16.c - 705 Brownlee Circle - public comment — original pdf
Backup
16.d - 705 Brownlee Circle - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Tom Bray Historic Preservation Office HR 2025-075283 Tuesday, August 5, 2025 7:40:15 PM 1048-_326_Restrictive Covenant.pdf You don't often get email from External Email - Exercise Caution Sofia, My name is Tom Bray and I own and live in 707 Brownlee Cir, Austin, TX 78703. Last week during the OWANA zoning meeting we met with designer for 705 Brownlee David Webber and discussed the existing restrictive covenants for the property. I have attached a copy for your records. I am opposed to additional stories being added to the current 705 structure and suggest a postponement of the upcoming HLC hearing until the matter of the additional stories is legally resolved. Thank you, Tom Bray CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
16.e - 705 Brownlee Circle - public comment — original pdf
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum, Meghan Yancy August 5, 2025 RE: PR-2025-062597 Dear Chair Heimsath and Commissioners, The applicant for 705 Brownlee Circle met with OWANA’s Zoning Committee on Thursday, July 31st. During that meeting, we learned that the proposed project has changed from a triplex to a fourplex since its previous appearance before the Board of Adjustment in October 2024. Additionally, a nearby neighbor brought to our attention a Restrictive Covenant and subdivision plat (attached) that limits development on Lot 34 (705 Brownlee Circle) to one story in height. A nearby neighbor present at the meeting and others unable to attend expressed concerns about the scale and massing of the proposed four-unit, four-story structure, as well as the implications of the existing Restrictive Covenant. OWANA recommends that the applicant schedule a meeting with the Architectural Review Committee (ARC), as they have not yet presented this revised design in that setting. We also encourage the applicant to engage with nearby neighbors to address concerns about the Restrictive Covenant and clarify whether a multi-story building is permissible under its terms. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Steering Committee Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association
16.f - 705 Brownlee Circle - public comment — original pdf
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Lukes, Austin M Blockley Wagner, Sofia Re: 705 Brownlee Wednesday, August 6, 2025 11:20:25 AM Outlook-Logo__Desc.png Hello Ms. Blockley, Thank you for providing this statement, and we will have your comments added to the record for this case. Please let us know if there is anything else we can do. Thank you, Austin Austin Lukes Planner Senior Planning Department, Historic Preservation Office 512-978-0766 austin.lukes@austintexas.gov From: . < . Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 8:26 PM To: Lukes, Austin <Austin.Lukes@austintexas.gov> Subject: 705 Brownlee @ You don't often get email from . @ . External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Austin Lukes. I am adding my voice to those of my Brownlee neighbors Tom Bray and Kim Overton to ask for a delay in the HLC hearing concerning the proposed multistory construction sought by the owner of 705 Brownlee, and to express again (as I did in person at City Hall October 24, 2024) to this violation of the neighborhood covenant of 1951. Sincerely, Mary Blockley 702 Brownlee Circle (since 1992, when I bought it from Gladys Shearer) CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
Agenda — original pdf
Regular Meeting of the Environmental Commission August 6, 2025 at 6:00 PM Permitting And Development Center, Events Center, Room 1405 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, Texas 78752 Some members of the Environmental Commission will be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Elizabeth Funk, Watershed Protection Department, at (512) 568-2244, Elizabeth.Funk@austintexas.gov, no later than noon the day before the meeting. The following information is required: speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, email address and telephone number (must be the same number that will be used to call into the meeting). CURRENT COMMISSIONERS: Haris Qureshi Justin Fleury Mariana Krueger, Vice Chair Martin Luecke Hanna Cofer, Secretary Ashika Ganguly Annie Fierro Jennifer Bristol, Chair David Sullivan Richard Brimer Isabella Changsut CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on July 2nd, 2025 and the Special Called Meeting on July 16th, 2025 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Name: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex, SP-2022-0567C Applicant: Katherine Lauer, 9442 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Plaza I, Suite 340, Austin, TX, 78759 Location: 7401 Loyola Lane, Austin, TX Council District: District 1 Staff: Eric Brown, Environmental Scientist Senior, 512-797-3139 Eric.brown@austintexas.gov Watershed Protection Department and Mike McDougal, Environmental Policy Program Manager, 512-974-6380 mike.mcdougal@austintexas.gov Development Services Department Applicant request: Variance request is as follows: 1. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-261(G) to allow floodplain modification within a CWQZ; 2. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-263 to allow floodplain modification outside of a CWQZ that is in good floodplain health condition; 3. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut up to 8 feet; and 4. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill up to 8 feet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommended with conditions DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. 4. Presentation of Development …
20250806-001: 20250702 Draft Minutes — original pdf
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, July 2, 2025 The Environmental Commission convened in a Regular meeting on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Bristol called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Jennifer Bristol, Mariana Krueger, Justin Fleury, Martin Luecke, Haris Qureshi Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Richard Brimer, David Sullivan Commissioners Absent: Isabella Changsut, Hanna Cofer, Annie Fierro, Ashika Ganguly PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Savannah Lee, Equity Action, Community Investment Plan Santiago, concerns on the I-35 project APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 4, 2025 The minutes of the Environmental Commission Regular Meeting on June 4, 2025, were approved on Commissioner Haris’ motion, Commissioner Sullivan’s second on a 7-0 vote. Commissioners Changsut, Cofer, Fierro, and Ganguly were absent. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. Recommend approval of the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for approval to include in the 5-year Capital spending plan as required by Financial Policy #8. Speakers: Frida Guo, Austin Water Tina Romero, Austin Water Liz Johnston, Interim Environmental Officer Kevin Critendon, Austin Water 1 A motion to recommend the Austin Water Capital Improvement Projects located in the Drinking Water Protection Zone for approval to include in the 5-year Capital spending plan with conditions passed on Commissioner Krueger’s motion Commissioner Bristol’s second on a 6–0 vote. Commissioner Brimer abstained. Commissioners Changsut, Cofer, Fierro, and Ganguly were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Presentation and discussion on the Rain to River Strategic Plan – Sari Albornoz, Planner Senior, Watershed Protection Department Item conducted as posted. No action taken. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Chair Bristol requested an agenda item to create a working group to review on WPD’s Rain to River draft strategic plan in the fall. Commissioner Sullivan requested an agenda item on artificial turf, seconded by Chair Bristol. Interim Environmental Officer Liz Johnston said staff are working on researching the topic and offered to present in the future. Commissioner Krueger asked for an update from Austin Energy in the wake of the microburst storm, seconded by Commissioner Qureshi. Interim Environmental Officer Liz Johnston offered to share the after action report from HSEM. Chair Bristol asked for an agenda item to learn more about how projects recycled concrete and other materials during redevelopment. Chair Bristol reminded commissioners that the July 16th meeting is …
20250806-001: 20250716 Draft Minutes — original pdf
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION SPECIAL CALLED MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, July 16, 2025 The Environmental Commission convened in a Special Called meeting on Wednesday, July 16, 2025, at 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive in Austin, Texas. Chair Bristol called the Environmental Commission Meeting to order at 6:11 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Jennifer Bristol, Mariana Krueger, Annie Fierro, Martin Luecke, David Sullivan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Richard Brimer Commissioners Absent: Haris Qureshi, Isabella Changsut, Hanna Cofer, Ashika Ganguly PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL STAFF BRIEFINGS 1. Staff briefing on Robert’s Rules and general commission procedures – Elizabeth Funk, Program Coordinator, Watershed Protection Department Item conducted as posted. No action taken. 2. Staff briefing on best practices for Environmental Commission recommendations – Liz Johnston, Interim Environmental Officer, Watershed Protection Item conducted as posted. No action taken. DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. Discuss goals and objectives for the Environmental Commission 2025-2026 year – Environmental Commission Chair Jennifer Bristol Item conducted as posted. No action taken. 1 ADJOURNMEN Chair Bristol adjourned the meeting at 8:30 pm without objection. 2
20250806-002: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex Applicant Exhibits Part1 — original pdf
March 28, 2025 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Applicant Contact Information Name of Applicant Street Address City State ZIP Code Work Phone E-Mail Address Katherine Lauer, P.E., GarzaEMC 9442 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Plaza I, Suite 340 Austin, TX 78759 512-298-3284 klauer@garzaemc.com Variance Case Information RBI Austin Child Development Complex SP-2022-0567C 7401 Loyola Lane, Austin, TX John Clement Case Name Case Number Address or Location Environmental Reviewer Name Environmental Resource Management Reviewer Name Applicable Ordinance Watershed Name Walnut Creek Watershed Classification ☐Urban X Suburban ☐Water Supply Suburban ☐Water Supply Rural ☐ Barton Springs Zone City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 1 March 28, 2025 Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone ☐ Barton Springs Segment ☐ Northern Edwards Segment X Not in Edwards Aquifer Zones Edwards Aquifer Contributing Zone Distance to Nearest Classified Waterway Water and Waste Water service to be provided by ☐ Yes X No The onsite waterway is classified as an intermediate waterway Austin Water – Wastewater SER approval The variance request is as follows (Cite code references): TITLE 25. – LAND DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 25-8. – ENVIRONMENT SUBCHAPTER A. – WATER QUALITY Request ARTICLE 7. – REQUIREMENTS IN ALL WATERSHEDS Division 1 – Waterway and Floodplain Protection Section 25-8-261(G) CRITICAL WATER QUALITY ZONE DEVELOPMENT & Section 25-8-263 FLOODPLAIN MODIFICATION Proposal is to allow grading modification and the addition of a crossing through the CWQZ and the floodplain located within the CWQZ. Existing 0 0 0% Proposed 234,614 5.386 31.4% The site is currently undeveloped grassland and 17.14 acres. The site is along the Imagine Austin Corridor with the corridor located north of the site along Loyola Lane. Per surveyed topographic data, there is an elevation change of approximately 35’ from the highest point (524’) of the site to the lowest point (477’) of the draw City of Austin | Environmental Commission Variance Application Guide 2 Impervious cover square footage: acreage: percentage: Provide general description of the property (slope range, elevation range, summary of vegetation / trees, March 28, 2025 summary of the geology, CWQZ, WQTZ, CEFs, floodplain, heritage trees, any other notable or outstanding characteristics of the property) that runs east to west through the center of the site. There are three creek channels that converge on-site then flow west through the center of the property. Portions of the dry creek bed have steeper slopes. The lot has both gentle and steep slopes in …
20250806-002: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex Applicant Exhibits Part2 — original pdf
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTOF FLOODPLAIN HEALTH 23 September 2021 Joe Farias Garza EMC 9442 Capital of Texas Highway North Austin, Texas 78759 RE: City of Austin Functional Assessment, Zone 2 — RBI at Loyola Lane Loyola Lane and Sendero Hills Parkway, Austin, Travis County, Texas HJN 21265.001 FA Dear Mr. Farias: The following provides a functional assessment of floodplain health findings from Horizon Environmental Services, Inc.’s (Horizon) field investigation conducted on 14 September 2021 for the above-referenced subject site. Horizon evaluated the subject site in accordance with the Watershed Protection Ordinance: Functional Assessment (FA) developed by the City of Austin (COA) Watershed Protection Development. The proposed project consists of development that has the potential to modify the 100-year floodplain and Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ) adjacent to unnamed tributaries of Walnut Creek. The subject site is located near the intersection of Loyola Lane and Sendero Hills Parkway, Austin, Travis County, Texas (Figure 1). Based on the location of the proposed construction activities within the CWQZ, Zone 2 of the FA was performed. Per the FA guidance, three 100-square-meter sample plots were to be evaluated along eight Zone 2 transects (Figure 2). Horizon took several photographs and measurements using the required tools listed in the FA. The tools included a 100-meter measuring tape, a densiometer, and a soil compaction meter. The hydric nature of vegetation species was determined from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) National Wetland Plant List. Photographs from the FA are provided in Appendix A and scoring sheets for the eight transects are provided in Appendix B. 21265-001FA CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1507 S Interstate 35 Austin, TX 78741-2502 (512) 328-2430 www.horizon-esi.com An LJA Company Williamson Taylor, TX Lago Vista, TX §¨¦35 £¤183 Austin, TX Lee Manor, TX Elgin, TX Travis £¤290 Belterra, TX Hays §¨¦35 Subject Site £¤183 Elroy, TX Caldwell Bastrop Bastrop, TX " "" " " " " " " " " " """" Legend " " Transect Subject Site Date: Drawn: 09/15/2021 TED HJN NO: 21265.001FA Source: OSM, 2021 Figure 1 Vicinity Map RBI at Loyola Lane Loyola Lane and Sendero Hills Parkway Austin, Travis County, Texas I 0 1,000 2,000 Feet 21265 - RBI at Loyola Lane\Graphics\21265-001FA_01A_Vicinity.mxd " T-1 " T-7 " " " " T-6 " " " T-2 T-3 " " Parkway Hills Sendero Loyola Lane Cordoba Drive T-4 T-5 " " " " " T-8 Legend " " Transect Critical …
20250806-002: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex Coversheet and Findings of Fact — original pdf
ITEM FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 6, 2025 NAME & NUMBER OF PROJECT: NAME OF APPLICANT OR ORGANIZATION: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex, SP-2022-0567C Katherine Lauer 9442 N Capital of Texas Hwy, Plaza I, Suite 340 Austin, TX, 78759 LOCATION: 7401 Loyola Lane, Austin, TX COUNCIL DISTRICT: District 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STAFF: WATERSHED: REQUEST: Eric Brown, Environmental Scientist Senior, 512-797-3139 Eric.brown@austintexas.gov Watershed Protection Department and Mike McDougal, Environmental Policy Program Manager, 512-974-6380 mike.mcdougal@austintexas.gov Development Services Department Walnut Creek Watershed Suburban Classification Desired Development Zone 1. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-261(G) to allow floodplain modification within a Critical Water Quality Zone; 2. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-263 to allow floodplain modification outside of a Critical Water Quality Zone that is in good floodplain health condition; 3. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-341 to allow cut up to 8 feet; and 4. Request to vary from LDC 25-8-342 to allow fill up to 8 feet. Page 2 of 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends these variances, having determined the findings of fact to have been met. STAFF CONDITIONS: Staff recommends the following conditions as shown on the provided exhibit: 1. Provide 1.55 acres of floodplain restoration 2. Provide 4.13 acres of floodplain mitigation 3. Pay $312,625.84 into the Riparian Zone Mitigation Fund 4. Place 4.74 acres of floodplain and 3.80 acres of environmentally sensitive land into conservation easement 5. Provide 0.63 acres of wildflower meadow in detention ponds 6. Provide an additional 0.62 acres of restoration within the conservation easement, outside of the floodplain Watershed Protection Department Staff Recommendations Concerning Required Findings Project Name: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex, SP-2022-0567C Ordinance Standard: Watershed Protection Ordinance (current code) Variance Request: Request to vary from LDC 25-8-261(G) to allow floodplain modification within the Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ) and from 25-8-263 to allow floodplain modification outside of a CWQZ that is in good floodplain health condition A. Land Use Commission variance determinations from Chapter 25-8-41 of the City Code: 1. The requirement will deprive the applicant of a privilege available to owners of other similarly situated property with approximately contemporaneous development; Yes The site proposes a baseball field, softball field, small building, associated drives & parking, and required water quality controls. The site is located along an Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Corridor, which allows a necessary crossing within the Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ) per section 25-8-262 of Title 25 …
20250806-002: RBI Austin Youth Development Complex Staff Presentation — original pdf
RBI Baseball Youth Development Complex SP-2022-0567C C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T RBI Baseball Proper ty Data • Walnut Creek Watershed • Water Supply Suburban • Wetland Critical Environmental Features on site • Council District 1 C I T Y O F A U S T I N W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 2 RBI Baseball Background C u r r e n t l y u n d eve l o p e d s i t e p r o p o s i n g a b a s e b a l l / s o f t b a l l f i e l d , s m a l l b u i l d i n g, a s s o c i a t e d a c c e s s d r i ve s & p a rk i n g, a n d r e q u i r e d wa t e r q u a l i t y c o n t r o l s. • T h i s va r i a n c e w i l l a l l o w a c c e s s t o a n d d eve l o p m e n t o f t h e s o u t h e r n h a l f o f t h e s u b j e c t t r a c t s i m i l a r t o t h e o t h e r p r o p e r t i e s a l o n g t h e I m a g i n e Au s t i n C o r r i d o r. T h i s s i t e i s c o n s t r a i n e d t o t h e p r …
20250806-003: Staff Report for Development Assessment for 600 E Riverside PUD — original pdf
BRIEFING SUMMARY SHEET DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT CASE NUMBER: CD-2025-0001 REQUEST: Presentation of a Development Assessment Report for 600 E. Riverside Planned Unit Development (PUD), located at 600 and 600 ½ East Riverside Drive, within the Lady Bird Lake Watershed in District 9. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The applicant has submitted a development assessment for an approximately 1.75-acre mixed use project located on the north side of East Riverside Drive, with frontage onto Lady Bird Lake and Blunn Creek. (see Case Map – Exhibit A). The property in question is currently developed with an approximately 12,746 square foot restaurant with associated surface parking and related facilities that is zoned L-V-NP and CS-1-V-NP. It is located within the Waterfront Overlay combining district (WO), the WO Travis Heights subdistrict, and within the boundaries of the South Central Waterfront District. It is designated as “Mixed Use” on the Future Land Use Map in the South River City Neighborhood Plan. The property is located within the Lady Bird Lake Watershed, which is classified as an Urban Watershed. The proposed PUD consists of a mixed use development proposing 200 residential units and 8,000 square feet of retail/ commercial space (see Development Assessment Application Letter – Exhibit B). The proposed PUD is in an area that includes the 100-year floodplain and Critical Water Quality Zone (CWQZ). The site is defined on two sides by the primary setback areas along Lady Bird Lake and Blunn Creek; through the PUD, approximately 27,061 square feet of existing impervious cover to be removed from the CWQZ, specifically 13,890 square feet within the primary setback established along Lady Bird Lake (see PUD Land Use Plan – Exhibit C). The applicant is proposing L, Lake Commercial District, as the baseline zoning district for the PUD, with a maximum height of 200 feet. Except as requested through modifications in the PUD, the site will be subject to regulations of the Waterfront Overlay combining district. The envisioned PUD proposal will seek twenty-two modifications from Land Development Code (see Proposed Code Modifications – Exhibit D). The applicant has stated in the submittal materials that the project will meet all of the applicable Tier One PUD development standards, Tier One Additional Requirements and offer elements of superiority in six Tier 2 categories (Open Space/Parkland; Environmental/Drainage; Community Amenities; Great Streets; Accessibility; Affordability). Therefore, they have stated that the proposed PUD will result in a superior development to that which could be …