AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING October 12, 2021 3:00 PM 2716 SPIRIT OF TEXAS DRIVE, ROOM 174-A AUSTIN, TEXAS 78719 (Note: The Mayor of the City of Austin Order No. 20210811-033 requires all individuals over the age of two to wear a face covering while present on or in City property unless expressly exempted in Section 2 of the order or by a City policy applicable to the premises or facility.) CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Eugene Sepulveda, Chair Scott Madole, Vice-Chair Jeremy Hendricks, Secretary Wendy Price Todd Vicky Sepulveda Ernest Saulmon Jonathan Coon Billy Owens Raymond Young Chad Ennis AGENDA CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 14, 2021 meeting. 2. WRITTEN STAFF BRIEFINGS a) August 2021 Financial Results. (Prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief of Finance) b) AUS Air Service Update. (Prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development) 3. VERBAL STAFF BRIEFINGS Speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. a) “Updates on the Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP)” presented by Tracy Thompson, Interim Chief of Planning and Development, and Shane Harbinson, 1 1 Deputy Chief of Planning and Development. b) “Contracting Methodologies” presented by Rolando Fernandez, Capital Contracting Officer and Cynthia Gonzales, Capital Contracting Deputy Officer. 4. CONSENT AGENDA a) Authorize negotiation and execution of a multi-term contract with Preferred Technologies LLC to provide an access control and identity management system for up to five years for a total contract amount not to exceed $6,400,000. (Note: This solicitation was reviewed for subcontracting opportunities in accordance with City Code Chapter 2-9C Minority Owned and Women Owned Business Enterprise Procurement Program. This solicitation listed one main scope of work. There were 4 MBEs and 4 WBEs available to bid on this solicitation. There were 7 bids submitted all of which were reviewed by SMBR. Out of the 7, there were 3 bidders that elected to utilize MWBEs on the contract. However, the contractor selected was not one of the bidders that will be using subcontractors. As such, no subcontracting goals were established.) b) Authorize negotiation and execution of a multi-term contract with Level 3 Financing, Inc. d/b/a Level 3 Telecom Holdings, LLC, a Lumen Technologies company, to Request for Proposals 8100 DDM3005, to provide data and telecommunications services, for up to ten years for a …
CONTRACTS: CAPITAL PROJECT DELIVERY Presented by: Rolando Fernandez, Jr. Capital Contracting Office 1 Presentation Overview • Traditional Procurement Methods • Alternative Procurement Methods • Summary and Q&A 2 Professional Services Stand-Alone Alt Delivery Design-Build Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services Invitation for Bid Professional Services Rotation Lists Alt Delivery Job Order Contracting Competitive Sealed Proposal Construction Services Indefinite Delivery/ Indefinite Quantity 3 Design/Bid/Build City of Austin (Owner) • Most Commonly Used • Lowest Cost, Responsive/Responsible Bidder Awarded Architect/ Engineer General Contractor 4 Professional Services 6-8 months – Issuance to Execution Stand-Alone RFQ • Single professional service provider contracts with the City for a specific project. Rotation Lists • Rotation List contracting allows the City to always have a group of qualified consultants available to perform a specific type of recurring work in a timely manner to meet the project and operational needs of the City. 5 Evaluation Criteria For Professional Services Consideration Item # Title Maximum Point Value 3a 3b 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 MBE/WBE PROCUREMENT PROGRAM (YES/NO) TURNED IN ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS (YES/NO) TEAM’S STRUCTURE TEAM’S PROJECT APPROACH EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL (PMgr = 10; ProjProf = 6; ProjPrin = 4) PRIME FIRM’S COMPARABLE PROJECT EXPERIENCE MAJOR SCOPES OF WORK – COMPARABLE PROJECT EXPERIENCE TEAM’S EXPERIENCE WITH AUSTIN ISSUES CITY OF AUSTIN’S EXPERIENCE WITH PRIME FIRM INTERVIEWS (OPTIONAL) Note: #3a, #3b, #4-#7, #9 may be edited by the Project Manager (PM) TOTAL 115 N/A N/A 10 20 20 15 15 10 10 15 6 Construction: Invitation for Bid 130 days – Issuance to Execution • Lowest responsible bidder is determined by: • Low Bid • City's MBE/WBE Program, solicitation goals met or Good Faith Efforts demonstrated • Experience, resources and safety 7 Alternative Delivery Procurement Methods Competitive Sealed Proposals (CSP) Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) Design Build (DB) Job Order Contracting (JOC) 8 Competitive Sealed Proposal Team Structure City of Austin (Owner) General Contractor Architects/ Engineers Subcontractors Suppliers Sub- Consultants 9 Competitive Sealed Proposal (CSP) 6-7 months – Issuance to Contract Execution BENEFITS: • Most similar to traditional (Design/Bid/Build) • • Contractor selected by Best Value Cost proposals are clarified and can be negotiated for changes in scope or schedule CONSIDERATIONS: • • • • • Council approval required for use of the methodology $1.5M budget limitation for civil work Requires complete drawings & specifications Not recommended for schedule-sensitive work Evaluation Panel Requirements 10 Construction …
Airport Expansion and Development Program Update to Airport Advisory Commission October 12, 2021 Draft for Review Overview Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP) • AEDP Program Elements • Recap of Recent AEDP Actions • Focus project: New Passenger Security Screening Lanes • Upcoming Airport Advisory Commission and City Council Action Items • Questions, Comments & Discussion AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review 1 AUS Activity is on the Rebound Significant passenger activity growth in 2021 AUS Monthly Activity 1.5M passengers 1.3M passengers s r e g n e s s a P l a t o T 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 2019 2020 Year/Month 2021 Source: City of Austin Department of Aviation AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review 2 AEDP Program Elements AEDP Program Summary 3 Optimize Barbara Jordan Terminal Four significant improvements to increase capacity and enhance operations Phase A Elements • New passenger screening capacity • New gate capacity, east and west • New checked bag screening system • Ticket counter expansion AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review 4 Barbara Jordan Terminal Source: City of Austin Department of Aviation Expansion Infrastructure Infrastructure improvements to enable new gate capacity Expansion Infrastructure Phase B Elements • Environmental Assessment • New Taxiways H&J • Utility infrastructure • New Central Utility Plant • Site Remediation contractor • Light Rail integration AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review 5 Source: City of Austin Department of Aviation New Concourse B Program scope and budget for Concourse B are currently in development 10+ Gate Midfield Concourse Phase C Major Elements • New 10+ gate Concourse B • Underground Tunnel connecting Barbara Jordan Terminal with Concourse B Expandable for Future Growth Source: City of Austin Department of Aviation AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review 6 Optimization and New Gateway to Concourse B AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review Source: City of Austin Department of Aviation 7 7 Recap of Recent AEDP Actions AEDP Program Summary 8 Environmental Assessment • Public Scoping held Meeting September 9, 2021 • Identified areas of environmental analysis focus • Initiated technical analyses • Initiated coordination with external agencies AEDP Program Summary Draft for Review 9 Airport Principal Architect/Engineer Consultant will provide a wide range …
AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2021 The Airport Advisory Commission convened in a Virtual Regular Meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 2021. CALL TO ORDER Chair E. Sepulveda called the Commission Meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Eugene Sepulveda – Chair Jeremy Hendricks – Secretary Billy Owens Vicky Sepulveda Ernest Saulmon Commissioners Absent: Scott Madole – Vice-Chair Jonathan Coon Chad Ennis Raymond Young Wendy Price Todd CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS: None. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) The minutes from the meeting of September 14, 2021 were approved on Commissioner Saulmon’s motion, Commissioner Young seconded. Motion passed on an 8-0-1-1 vote. Commissioner Todd abstained. Vice Chair Madole was absent. 2. WRITTEN STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “August 2021 Financial Results” prepared by Rajeev Thomas, Deputy Chief, Finance. 1 b) “AUS Air Service Update” prepared by Jamy Kazanoff, Air Service Development. 3. VERBAL STAFF BRIEFINGS a) “Updates on the Airport Expansion and Development Program (AEDP)” presented by Shane Harbinson, Deputy Chief of Planning and Development. b) “Contracting Methodologies” presented by Rolando Fernandez, Capital Contracting Officer. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Items 4a and 4b were pulled for discussion by Chair E Sepulveda due to MBE/DBE issues. Item 4c was pulled for discussion by Chair E Sepulveda for questions regarding airport egress. Items 4d and 4e were pulled for discussion by Chair E Sepulveda due to the need to discuss the consent agenda format going forward. a) Authorize negotiation and execution of a multi-term contract with Preferred Technologies LLC to provide an access control and identity system for up to five years for a total contract amount not to exceed 6,400,000. A motion to approve was made by Secretary Hendricks; Commissioner Todd seconded. Motion passed on an 8-0-1-1 vote. Commissioner Coon abstained. Vice Chair Madole was absent. Chair E Sepulveda notes he voted in favor after SMBR staff clarified that the contract awardee is registered with the state as a veteran-owned business but is not registered with the City of Austin as an MWBE/DBE. b) Authorize negotiation and execution of a multi-term contract with Level 3 Financing, Inc. DBA Level 3 Telecom Holdings LLC, a Lumen Technologies Company, to Request for Proposals 8100 DDM3005 to provide data and telecommunications services for up to ten years for a total contract amount not to exceed $7,000,000. A motion to approve was made by Commissioner V Sepulveda; Commissioner Saulmon seconded. Motion passed on a 7-1-1-1 vote. …
LGBTQ QUALITY OF LIFE ADVISORY COMMISSION Monday, October 11, 2021 7:00 p.m. City of Austin Permitting and Development Center, Room 1401 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr., Austin, Texas 78752 District Commissioner 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kannou (Kimberly) Curette VACANT Victor Martinez Holly Kirby Ruben Baeza Rebecca Dreke VACANT Saul Gonzalez CALL TO ORDER District 9 10 Mayor At-Large At-Large At-Large At-Large AGENDA Commissioner Nan Dowling Brandon Wollerson Marti Bier Grant Loveless Charles Curry Ryn Gonzales (Chair) Melissa Taylor (Vice Chair) PUBLIC COMMUNICATION – Each speaker will have 3 minutes to speak. 1. MOTION TO SUSPEND ROBERT’S RULES OF ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- September 13, 2021 3. REGULAR BUSINESS – The commission may act or make recommendations on the following topics: a. Presentation by Health Management Associates of a final report on the LGBTQIA+ Quality of Life Study. (Sponsor: Gonzales; Strategic Outcome: Government That Works for All) ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Staff Liaison Alyssa Parra at 512-974-2834 or email Alyssa.parra@austintexas.gov, for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the LGBTQ Quality of Life Commission, please contact Alyssa Parra at (512) 974-2834.
Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 1 Community Partners ............................................................................................................................. 1 Research Team ..................................................................................................................................... 1 City of Austin ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 3 Key Themes .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 4 Study Framework ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Key Themes Across Data Collection Tools ............................................................................................... 6 Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 9 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 9 COVID-19 Pandemic and Racial Unrest ............................................................................................... 9 LGBTQIA+ Population in US, Texas, and Austin ................................................................................ 10 Austin LGBTQIA+ History ................................................................................................................... 11 Research Advisory Board ................................................................................................................... 12 Qwell Foundation Prior Surveys.......................................................................................................... 13 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Qualitative Findings ................................................................................................................................. 14 Stakeholder Interviews ........................................................................................................................ 15 Town Halls ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Focus Groups ...................................................................................................................................... 23 Power Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 27 Quantitative Findings .............................................................................................................................. 30 Summation of Comparative Data ........................................................................................................ 30 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Community and Social Connectedness .............................................................................................. 33 Economic Opportunity and Work ........................................................................................................ 37 Educational Opportunity and Access .................................................................................................. 41 Health .................................................................................................................................................. 43 Housing ............................................................................................................................................... 68 Personal Safety ................................................................................................................................... 70 Social and Public Services/Benefits .................................................................................................... 75 Overall Quality of Life .......................................................................................................................... 78 Disparities................................................................................................................................................ 79 Policy Priorities ........................................................................................................................................ 92 Findings Across Foundational Outcomes ............................................................................................... 93 Community and Social Connectedness .............................................................................................. 93 Economic Opportunity ......................................................................................................................... 94 Health .................................................................................................................................................. 94 Housing ............................................................................................................................................... 95 Safety .................................................................................................................................................. 96 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion ........................................................................................................... 97 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 98 Key Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 98 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................. 101 About HMA Community Strategies ....................................................................................................... 102 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................... 103 Acknowledgments A. HMA Community Strategies is deeply grateful for the support and participation of countless LGBTQIA+ and allied organizations, groups, businesses, and community members throughout this project. Community Partners Research Team HMA Community Strategies Charles Robbins, MBA – Project Director Iliana Gilman, MA – Project Manager Michelle Parra, PhD Catherine Guerrero, MPH Ryan Maganini Research Advisory Board Alexander Anderson KB Richard Bondi Sha’nyia Baltimore Sam Davis Tabitha Hamilton Lex Keaton Rocky Lane Lais Milburn Philip Schnarrs Alexander Zapata City of Austin City of Austin’s Equity Office Brion Oaks, Chief Equity Officer Kellee Coleman, Business Process Consultant, Sr. Amanda Jasso, Equity & Inclusion Program Manager Rocío Villalobos, Immigrant Affairs Program Manager Joshua Robinson, Equity & Inclusion Program Coordinator Enakshi Ganguly, Public Information Specialist, Sr. Brandon Kroos, Business Process Specialist LGBTQ Quality of Life Advisory Commission Ruben Baeza Sandra Chavez Charles Curry Kannou Curette Tarik Daniels Deirdre Doughty Nan Dowling Saul Gonzalez Christina Gorczynski Kathryn Gonzales Terrance Hines Holly Kirby Rebecca Dreke Dr. Victor Martinez Melissa Taylor Brandon Wollerson Tarik Daniels 1 2 Executive Summary This report summarizes the results of the ShoutOut Austin Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Monday, October 11, 2021 – 4:30 PM Street Jones Building City of Austin Historic Preservation Office Conference Room 400A 1000 E. 11th Street Austin, Texas 78702 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Terri Myers Kevin Koch Beth Valenzuela CALL TO ORDER AGENDA CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. BRIEFINGS BY APPLICANTS ON HISTORIC REVIEW APPLICATIONS AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF OTHER PROJECTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 2406 Harris Blvd. – Jackson-Novy-Kelly-Hovy House Addition of metal fence at front yard 1419 Newning Ave. – Dumble-Boatright House Consideration of synthetic roofing material: CeDUR 1104 Charlotte St. – Clarksville National Register Historic District Raise house and move away from street to construct basement, construct side addition 1500 Hartford Rd. – Old West Austin National Register Historic District Window replacement, dormer addition, roof replacement 1 5. 6. 7. 1505 Travis heights Blvd. – Travis Heights – Fairview Park National Register Historic District Remodel a contributing house. 1104 Toyath St. – Clarksville National Register Historic District Construct a new building 1400 Mohle Dr. – Old West Austin National Register Historic District Construct a new building ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-3393 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Historic Landmark Commission, please contact Amber Allen, Planner II, at 512-974-3393; Steve Sadowsky, Historic Preservation Officer, at 512-974-6454; Kalan Contreras, Senior Planner, at 512-974-2727; or Elizabeth Brummett, Historic Preservation Office manager, at 512-974-1264. 2
1104 Charlotte St Kindra Welch and family 9/13/2021 Clarksville Cottage constructed early 1900’s 720 sqft Structural Board-Batten Siding, Original front porch, original front door, 3 out of 8 original windows Heritage Tree More recent Rear porch minor structural issues with original Juniper piers Threats to the House: 1. Eastern front corner sits directly on the ground enabling deterioration of wood structure and a near constant termite invasion Threats to the House: 2. Driveway slopes towards the house Threats to the House: 3. The house is the focal point of 12th street traffic, including restaurant and retail traffic from commercial area 1 block away. New Years Eve ’03-’04 a driver crashed his truck through the front wall and into the living room. Threats to the House: 1. One corner sits directly in contact with the ground. 2. Driveway slopes towards the house 3. The house is the focal point of 12th street traffic. LONG TERM SOLUTION: Significantly Raise the House (And hopefully maintain Historic Contributing Status) EXISTING SITEPLAN DEMO BACK PORCH PUSH HOUSE AWAY FROM THE STREET APPROX. 4’- 4” AND RAISE UP 6’-7’ PROPOSAL “NORTH DRIVEWAY” VIEW FROM THE EAST “NORTH DRIVE” VIEW FROM THE SOUTHEAST “NORTH DRIVE” VIEW FROM THE SOUTH “NORTH DRIVE” SECOND SITEPLAN PROPOSAL “SOUTH DRIVE” PUSH HOUSE ABOUT 6’ INTO CURRENT DRIVEWAY AND MOVE DRIVEWAY TO OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE HOUSE VIEW FROM THE EAST “SOUTH DRIVE” VIEW FROM THE SOUTHEAST “SOUTH DRIVE” VIEW FROM THE SOUTH “SOUTH DRIVE” Neighborhood context Neighborhood context
ATTACHED CARPORT 6 5 9 T HE O 0 10 20 30 40 FT 8 5 9 T 7 5 9 T rock wall 9 7 K C A B T E D S R YA R A E 10' R metal steps see note at proposed ADU floor plans - p.3 9 7 uncovered wood deck & steps NOTE ON OVERHANGS [WHERE APPLICABLE] roof eave projections <50 from property lines must meet 1-hr. rating per 2015 IRC table R302.1(1). [i.e.: solid 'hardisoffit' or equal at underside, no venting] roof eave projections MAY NOT project more than 2'-0" into a required yard (S 31°51'00" W -- 69.21') 5' PUE (PLAT) concrete slab to be removed 9 3 O H E G G rock w all 8 9 concrete stoop & steps 5' SID E Y A R D S E T B A C K 9 9 r o c k w all O H E 9 4 W O H E 1 5' S T R E E T S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REPLACE ROOF OVER FAMILY / DINING new gable roof AREA OF ADDITION new dormer roof above existing construction COVERED FRONT PORCH O H E 9 5 ( N 4 8 ° 2 4'0 9 6 3 5 9 T O H E 0" W -- 1 1 1.6 8') E N FI E L D R O A D uncovered concrete porch & steps 4 5 9 T sid e w alk 2 5 9 T 9 8 O H E 9 7 O H E O O HE H E c u r b inlet O H E O HE 9 9 O HE 1 6 4 T O HE O H O E HE W O HE CH = N 81°01'56" E -- 13.37' A=15.43' R=8.43' 2-STORY ADU 1500 Hartford Road, Building #2 pier & beam / slab foundation 2-STORY HOUSE 1500 Hartford Road pier & beam foundation S 60°09'00" E - -- 120.47' (120.00') attached carport 1 0 0 concrete stoop & steps E K C A ETB D S R O H E NTYA O 25' FR O H E 1 0 1 O H E concrete walkway & steps 5 5 9 T HE O 1 0 2 HE O HE O 10'-4" existing curb cut to remain D A …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 HR-2021-126308 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1505 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD C.6 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Partially demolish contributing residence to replace all siding, windows, railings, and roof. Convert attic into second floor and crawlspace into basement. 1) Convert attic to second floor: modify roofline, increasing pitch and replacing existing material with metal roof. Add shed-roofed stucco dormers to secondary elevations to create habitable attic space. Add rear balcony with metal guardrails, creating a flat-roofed rear porch below. 2) Partially demolish and remodel front porch: replace original wood handrails at porch with metal safety railings. Replace original box columns and masonry piers with painted metal posts. Remove original porch gable and replace with metal shed roof. Add built-in steel planters in front of porch. 3) Remove and replace original horizontal wood siding with fiber cement board-and-batten siding. 4) Remove and replace original 1:1 wood windows and screens with undivided fixed and casement windows. 5) Remove original wood front door and replace with fully glazed double doors. 6) Convert crawlspace into basement: construct rear deck and access stairs. Construct basement-level patio. The proposed basement walk-out is stucco, with sliding glass doors and horizontal metal handrails at stairs. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story Craftsman bungalow with gabled roof, horizontal wood siding, mulled 1:1 wood windows, and a full-width porch supported by boxed columns on brick piers. Intact decorative details include deep eaves with exposed rafter tails and triangular knee braces at gable ends. The house at 1505 Travis Heights Boulevard was built for Fred and Julia C. Penick before 1924. Fred Penick was a bank teller, cashier, and clerk at the American National Bank for most of his career. Julia Penick, active in various community- building and youth enrichment programs, ran a summer camp with her older children. Penick had previously been employed as a camp employee at Yosemite National Park. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes intact historic material from the building’s exterior without attempting repair of deteriorated elements. Replacement elements do not look the same and are not made of the same materials as …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 HR-2021-115725 CLARKSVILLE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1104 TOYATH STREET C.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new residence with carport, pool, and roof deck. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) The proposed new building is 3 stories in height. It is clad in vertical fiber cement siding and capped with a metal roof. Fenestration includes single-hung and fixed windows and a horizontally glazed front door. A roof deck with horizontal metal railing sits atop the house, accessible by a spiral staircase at the side elevation; the staircase is partially enclosed by a transparent wood screen. Its full-width front porch is supported by boxed columns and the front and rear gables that comprise its compound roofline are accented by triangular knee braces. 2) Construct a deck and pool behind the main house. 3) Construct a retaining wall at the rear of the house. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building is set back approximately 25’. This property is adjacent to the Lawson House, a historic landmark, and proposed new construction may overpower it due to the height difference between the two buildings. 2. Orientation The proposed new building has a consistent orientation with the rest of the buildings on the block. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed new building is three stories plus a roof deck—much taller than the single-story contributing buildings on the block. However, due to the slope of the lot, the first floor is not visible from the street. Its complex massing is also at odds with the relatively simple contributing homes of Clarksville. 4. Proportions The proposed new building’s design is strongly vertical, which does not reflect the more horizontal proportions of the modest contributing houses on the block. 5. Design and style The proposed design is somewhat compatible in its inclusion of a front porch, its front-facing gables, its siding material, and its relatively rhythmic fenestration patterns. The decorative brackets added to the gables are not appropriate for its modern style. The building is less compatible in its scale, massing, and proportions; the rear portion of the house appears somewhat overpowering. 6. Roofs The gabled roofline …
LOWEST ELEV=525.1 FT ADDRESS: 1104 TOYATH ST TX 78703 CEN 50 FT OF ORIG LOT 6 BLK 13 MAAS ADDN ZONING SF-3 PROTECTED TREE - YES LOT SIZE: 6248 SF CONDITIONED SQ FOOTAGE: 2458 SF PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE NEW RESIDENCE 1104 TOYATH ST AUSTIN, TX 78703 LOCATED CORNER OF HOUSE @ 2 " OF SIDE + 25' - 4 3 8" OFF FROM PL 5' - 6 1 2049: 19" HACKBERRY TO BE REMOVED 2051 2050 2048 25'-43 8" OH GAS GAS OH W GAS OH W 534.2 " 2 1 6 GAS - ' 5 2052 W 3 4 C U R B & G U T T E R ⅊ WW WW FRONT DOOR LOCATION WW 25'-0" B.L. MATERIAL STORAGE FF = 527.1 2458 SQFT NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME 3BED/3BATH PROVIDE GAS FOR POOL EQUIPMENT POOL UTILITIES . L . B " 0 - ' 5 125'-0" 529.1 A/C PAD A/C PAD POOL EQPMT ⅊ GAS METER " 2 1 2 - ' 8 PROVIDE FIRE BLOCKING IN ALL EAVES CLOSER THAN 5' TO PROPERTY LINE 525.9 2047 1ST FLOOR WOOD POOL DECK LOW POINT NATURAL 526 DUMPSTER 1 HIGH POINT NATURAL GRADE=534.9 3RD FLOOR " 0 - ' 2 1 5 3 8 NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 5 3 7 5 3 6 5 3 5 5 3 4 2039 2040 535.9 " 2 1 4 - ' 2 " 6 - ' 3 " 0 - ' 2 " 6 - ' 3 5 3 3 ⅊ 2ND FLOOR 5 3 2 . L . B " 0 - ' 5 1 1 4 " 1 5 ' - 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 0 5 5 2 2 9 8 5 2 7 5 2 6 2 2041 2042 40'-0" TENT1 =535.9 40'-0" TENT 2= 530.9 530.9 530.9 2043 125'-0" T P 526.9 CARPORT NEW DESCRIPTION DRIVEWAY/WALK 733 973 1ST FLOOR HOUSE 10 2ND FLOOR HOUSE 403 90 POOL & SPA COPING 63 WOOD POOL DECK (126 2 ) 14 METAL LANDING SPIRAL STAIRS A/C PAD 18 32 POOL EQUIPMENT 139 RETAINING WALL 108 180 2763 TOTAL REAR PORCH FRONT PORCH 6248 LOT SIZE 44.22% 45% (2812 SF) ALLOWED IN SF-3 I.C. 10'-0" B.L. PROPOSED FLOOR TO AREA RATIO " 0 - ' 0 5 ⅊ TP NEW DESCRIPTION 973 180 108 403 1664 1ST LEVEL REAR PORCH FRONT PORCH …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 PR-2021-130292 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1400 MOHLE DRIVE C.11 – 1 Demolish a contributing building and garage. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story brick Tudor Revival house with cross-gabled roof, arched offset doorway, paired 1:1 windows with decorative screens, and concrete front stoop enclosed by metal railing. The house at 1400 Mohle Drive was built in 1939 for Elizabeth and Benjamin Tobin. The Tobins owned a barber and beauty shop, where they both worked; Benjamin Tobin ran the barbershop and Elizabeth Tobin operated the beauty salon. The shop was located first at 1138 San Jacinto, then at 113 East 21st Street. The Tobins occupied the home until at least 1973. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register Historic District. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high to moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building displays Tudor Revival stylistic influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the demolition application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. New construction in National Register Historic Districts must be evaluated by the Historic Landmark Commission prior to issuance of a demolition permit. LOCATION MAP C.11 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos C.11 – 3 Google Street View and demolition application, 2021 Occupancy History City Directory Research, August 2021 1959 1957 1955 1952 1949 1947 Benjamin A. and Elizabeth M. Tobin, owners Tobin’s Barber Shop Benjamin A. and Elizabeth M. Tobin, owners Texas Barber Shop Benjamin A. and Elizabeth M. Tobin, owners Texas Barber Shop Benjamin A. and Elizabeth M. Tobin, owners Texas Barber Shop Benjamin A. and Elizabeth M. …
BOA SIGN REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C16-2021-0011 BOA DATE: October 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 2111 Rio Grande St OWNER: Villa Rios, LP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: Renee Bornn ZONING: GO-MU; LO-NP; MF-4-NP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LT 1-3 OLT 23-1/2 DIV D HORSTS LOUIS SUBD VARIANCE REQUEST: requesting a total of one (1) sign on the property: (F) to allow one (1) wall sign above the second floor (maximum allowed) to the eighth floor (requested) and (H) to allow for the one (1) sign to be illuminated. SUMMARY: to attach a wall sign ISSUES: preservation of historical building takes up a substantial portion of the 2nd Fl availability for illuminated signage. ZONING LAND USES Site GO-MU; LO-NP; MF-4-NP North GO-MU-H-NP South MF-4-NP East West GO-MU-H-NP; GO-MU LO-NP General Office-Mixed Use; Limited Office; Multi-Family High Density General Office-Mixed Use-Historic Landmark Multi-Family General Office-Mixed Use Limited Office NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee) Central Austin Community Development Corporation Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association My Guadalupe Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Preservation Austin SELTexas Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group University Area Partners West Campus Neighborhood Association C-1/1 L R A E P 24TH N O T E S S E C E U N 23RD E D N A R G O R I L R A E P 22ND HALF 22ND S E C E U N 23RD WEST MALL UT E P U L A D A U G INNER CAMPUS I O N O T N A N A S 23RD I L E R B A G N A S 21ST L R A E P 21ST MARTIN LUTHER KING JR 20TH 18TH 17TH T S E W 18TH E D N A R RIO G S E C E U N NIO O T N N A A S ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS C16-2021-0011 CASE#: LOCATION: 2111 RIO GRANDE STREET This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 292 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet C-2 DATE: August 9, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C16-2021-0003 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne (ABSTAINING) _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel _______Darryl Pruett (no show) _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith _______Michael Von Ohlen (out) _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Michael Gaudini OWNER: Timothy Finley ADDRESS: 2552 GUADALUPE ST VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides. (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the northern, one (1)on the southern, one (1) on the eastern and one (1) on the western sides, to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Moxy Hotel in a “CS-CO-NP”, General Commercial Services- Conditional Overlay Combining District– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non- electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building. (G) A wall sign is permitted if the sign complies with this subsection. (1) One projecting sign D-1/1 for each building façade is permitted (H) A sign may not be illuminated or contain electronic images or moving parts. BOARD’S DECISION: Jan 11, 2021 POSTPONED TO FEBRUARY 8, 2021 (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstaining); Feb 8, 2021 POSTPONED TO MARCH 8, 2021; March 8, 2020 The public hearing was closed by Chair Don Leighton-Burwell, Board Member Veronica Rivera motions to Postpone to April 12, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-0 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained); POSTPONED TO APRIL 12, 2021. (RENOTICE) VARIANCE REQUESTED: RENOTICE The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 12 signs on the property: a) b) c) (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0093 BOA DATE: October 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 8818 Big View Dr #4 OWNER: Jeff & Ally Davidson COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 AGENT: Janis J. Smith ZONING: SF-1-CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 4 BLK A PANTHER HOLLOW CREEK PHS II VARIANCE REQUEST: increase the dock length 30 feet (required) to 50 feet (requested) SUMMARY: erect a boat dock ISSUES: extremely shallow water ZONING LAND USES SF-1-CO Site North RR South East West SF-1-CO LA SF-1-CO Single-Family Rural Residential Single-Family Single-Family / Lake Austin Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: 2222 Coalition of Neighborhood Association, Inc. Austin Lost and Found Pets Canyon Creek HOA Edgewater Association Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Glenlake Neighborhood Association Leander ISD Population and Survey Analysts Long Canyon Homeowners Assn. Long Canyon Phase II & III Homeowners Assn Inc Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation River Place HOA Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group Steiner Ranch Community Association TNR BCP Westminster Glen HOA Travis County Natural Resources E-1/1 ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS C15-2021-0093 CASE#: LOCATION: 8818 BIG VIEW DR #4 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 417 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. E-1/2 E-1/3 E-1/4 E-1/5 E-1/6 E-1/7 E-1/8 E-1/9 E-1/10 E-1/11 E-1/12 E-1/13
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0096 BOA DATE: October 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 5700 Grover Ave & 5612 Roosevelt Ave OWNER: Family Sports, Inc., a Texas Corporation COUNCIL DISTRICT: 7 AGENT: David Hartmann ZONING: MF-6-CO-NP (Brentwood NP) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 697 SUR 7 * 3.81 AC SPEAR G W W 184.10 FT OF LOT 10 BLK 15 BROADACRES VARIANCE REQUEST: increase the maximum allowable Compatibility Height requirements from three stories and 40 feet (maximum allowed) to four stories and 45 feet (requested) SUMMARY: erect Multi-Family with voluntary affordable housing units ISSUES: Critical Water Quality zone, easements, floodplain, fire lane constraints, enhanced 40 ft. building setback ZONING LAND USES Site MF-6-CO-NP North MF-6-CO-NP South East West SF-3-NP; MF-3-NP SF-3-NP SF-3-NP Multi-Family Multi-Family Single-Family; Multi-Family Single-Family Single-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Brentwood Neighborhood Assn. Brentwood Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Central Austin Community Development Corporation Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Homeless Neighborhood Association Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Austin Neighborhood Alliance Preservation Austin SELTexas Shoal Creek Conservancy Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group E-2/1 ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS C15-2021-0096 CASE#: LOCATION: 5700 GROVER AVENUE & 5612 ROOSEVELT AVEUNE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 417 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. E-2/2 CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application please complete Section as needed. For Office Use Only If more space is required, Section 1: Applicant Statement 5700 Grover Avenue and 5612 Roosevelt Avenue See Exhibit A MF-6-CO-NP David Hartman Family Sports, Inc., a Texas corporation September Select 2021 E-2/3 Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Section 2: Variance Findings The Board must determine the existence of, sufficiency of, and weight of evidence supporting the findings described below. Therefore, you must complete each of the applicable Findings Statements as part of your application. Failure to do so may result in your application being rejected as incomplete. Please attach any additional supporting documents. NOTE: The Board …
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0097 BOA DATE: October 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 4315 Avenue A OWNER: Gary J. Hobbs COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 AGENT: Nathan Hobbs ZONING: SF-3-NCCD-NP (Hyde Park NCCD) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W 76FT OF LOT 1-3 BLK 11 HYDE PARK ADDN NO 1 VARIANCE REQUEST: decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements from 5,750 square feet (required) to 5,700 square feet (requested) and increase the improvement value from 20% (allowed) to 60% (requested) SUMMARY: complete a remodel and addition ISSUES: lot configuration, location of heritage trees, unhabitable home Site North South East West ZONING SF-3-NCCD-NP SF-3-NCCD-NP; MF-3- NCCD-NP SF-3-NCCD-NP; MF-4- NCCD-NP MF-4-NCCD-NP MF-4-NCCD-NP LAND USES Single-Family Single-Family; Multi-Family Single-Family; Multi-Family Multi-Family Multi-Family NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Central Austin Community Development Corporation Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Friends of Hyde Park Homeless Neighborhood Association Hyde Park Neighborhood Assn. Hyde Park Neighborhood Plan Contact Team My Guadalupe Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation North Austin Neighborhood Alliance Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group E-3/1 ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS CASE#: LOCATION: C15-2021-0097 4315 AVENUE A This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 292 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. E-3/2 E-3/3 E-3/4 E-3/5 E-3/6 E-3/7 E-3/8 E-3/9 E-3/10 E-3/11 E-3/12 E-3/13 E-3/14 E-3/15 E-3/16 E-3/17 E-3/18 E-3/19 E-3/20 E-3/21 E-3/22 E-3/23 E-3/24 E-3/25 E-3/26 E-3/27 E-3/28 E-3/29 E-3/30 E-3/31 E-3/32 E-3/33 E-3/34 E-3/35 E-3/36 E-3/37
BOA GENERAL REVIEW COVERSHEET CASE: C15-2021-0098 BOA DATE: October 11th, 2021 ADDRESS: 5200 McKinney Falls Pkwy COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2 AGENT: Alecia Mosadomi OWNER: PAP Realty Partnership/ MVE Ventures, Ltd./ The WP & AP Ltd. ZONING: MF-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ABS 24 DELVALLE S ACR 13.5883 (1-D-1W) VARIANCE REQUEST: increase height limit from 30 feet (minimum allowed) to 47 feet (requested), increase height limit from 40 feet (maximum allowed) to 47 feet (requested), increase height limit from 40 feet plus one foot for each 10 feet of distance in excess of 100 feet but not more than 300 feet (maximum allowed) to 47 feet (requested) SUMMARY: erect Multi-Family Housing ISSUES: floodplain which places constraints on the location, size and configuration of structures ZONING LAND USES MF-4 2 mi. ETJ Site North South RR East West P DR Multi-Family 2 mi. ETJ Rural Residential Public Development Reserve NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Caracol Southeast Del Valle Community Coalition Del Valle Independent School District Dove Springs Proud Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Go Austin Vamos Austin 78744 Homeless Neighborhood Association Onion Creek Homeowners Assoc. Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group E-4/1 M C KIN N E Y FA LLS ! ! ± SUBJECT TRACT PENDING CASE ! ! ! ! ZONING BOUNDARY NOTIFICATIONS C15-2021-0098 CASE#: LOCATION: 5200 MCKINNEY FALLS PARKWAY This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. 1 " = 417 ' This product has been produced by CTM for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. E-4/2 Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application DevelopmentATX.com | Phone: 311 (or 512-974-2000 outside Austin) For submittal and fee information, see austintexas.gov/digitaldevelopment WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. This application is a fillable PDF that can be completed electronically. To ensure your information is saved, click here to Save the form to your computer, then open your copy and continue. The Tab key may be used to navigate to each field; Shift + Tab moves to the previous field. The Enter key activates links, emails, and buttons. Use the Up & Down Arrow keys to scroll through drop-down lists and check boxes, and hit Enter …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-3 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0056 DATE: Monday August 9, 2021 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___N____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___-____Darryl Pruett (out- no show) ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Michael Von Ohlen (out) ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Andrea Hamilton OWNER: Chase & Andrea Hamilton ADDRESS: 3006 GLENVIEW AVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to erect a detached garage/office in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (Windsor Road Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC for a Through Lot, a rear yard must comply with the minimum requirements applicable to a front yard. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA JULY 12, 2021 POSTPONED TO AUG 9, 2021 AE DENIAL; Aug 9, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to October 11, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 9-1 vote (Board Member Brooke Bailey nay); POSTPONED TO October 11, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: F-1/1 (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chair forF-1/2 CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0056 DATE: Monday July 12, 2021 _______Thomas Ates _______Brooke Bailey _______Jessica Cohen _______Melissa Hawthorne _______Barbara Mcarthur _______Rahm McDaniel (OUT) _______Darryl Pruett _______Agustina Rodriguez _______Richard Smith (OUT) _______Michael Von Ohlen _______Nicholl Wade _______Kelly Blume (Alternate) _______Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: Andrea Hamilton OWNER: Chase & Andrea Hamilton ADDRESS: 3006 GLENVIEW AVE VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet (required) …
F-1/24 F-1/25 F-1/26 F-1/27 F-1/28 F-1/29 F-1/30 F-1/31 F-1/32 F-1/33 F-1/34 F-1/35 Ramirez, Elaine From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Importance: High Friday, July 09, 2021 5:40 PM Ramirez, Elaine; Ramirez, Diana C15-2021-0056 3006 Glenview Avenue Agenda Item D-2 3006 Glenview 7-12-21 BOA case.pdf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Good afternoon Elaine and Diana, Please be sure that the Board of Adjustment members get the following position statement and attachment before the Monday, July 12, 2021 hearing. By the way, the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association did not receive notification of this variance hearing from the City, rather we received it second hand from another neighborhood association. Thank you, Joyce Basciano Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association Dear Chair Cohen and Members of the Board of Adjustment, Re: C15‐2021‐0056 3006 Glenview Avenue Agenda Item D‐2 The Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association (BWNA) Board of Directors considered this variance request. In the case of through lots we are guided by the precedent set by the Board of Adjustment on Monday, September 8, 2014 in Case Number C15‐2014‐0115 (see attachment). That case involved another through lot on Glenview Avenue that backed up to Jefferson St. (3200 Glenview, cited in the backup for 3006 Glenview). The 2014 BOA Decision granted a variance decreasing the 25 ft setback to 10 ft from the property line, not 5 ft. A 10 ft rear lot setback is still reasonable for through lots on Glenview Avenue and is in keeping with the historic character of Jefferson St. Accordingly, we support a decrease of the 25 ft setback to 10 ft but oppose a decrease of the setback to 5 ft. Thank you for your service to the community, Joyce Basciano, for the Bryker Woods Neighborhood Association CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 F-1/36 F-1/37 F-1/38 From: To: Subject: Date: Kathryn Timmerman Ramirez, Elaine C15-2021-0056 Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:31:40 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** C15-2021-0056 Elaine, I live at 2908 Glenview Avenue, Austin, Texas 78703 and I writing you in support of the variance from the Land Development Code requested by Andrea Hamilton. Thank you, Kathryn Timmerman 512-825-8375 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet E-4 DATE: Monday August 9, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0062 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___-____Darryl Pruett (out – no show) ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Michael Von Ohlen (out) ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___-____Carrie Waller (Alternate) _______Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: David Cancialosi OWNER: Christen Steen ADDRESS: 3401 RIVERCREST DR VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (C) (3) (a) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent or less from 35 percent (allowed) to 48 percent (requested), (53% existing) (b) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of 15 percent and not more than 25 percent from 10 percent (allowed) to 49 percent (requested), (54.25% existing) (c) increase the maximum impervious cover on a slope with a gradient of more than 25 percent and not more than 35 percent from 5 percent (allowed) to 18 percent (requested), (4.41% existing) (d) increase maximum impervious cover on a slope gradient greater than 35 percent to 3 percent (requested), (0.83% existing) in order to erect a Single-Family + associated improvements in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. Note: This section of the Land Development Code applies to lots that are included in a subdivision plat recorded before April 22, 1982 or a tract that is not required to be platted. For the above address the Subdivision Plat was recorded on January 4, 1965 F-2/1 The overall change in IC is from 21.51% to a proposed 20.89% IC, or 8,084 SF IC to 7,883 SF IC, when calculated on a gross lot area basis. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA JULY 12, 2021 POSTPONED TO AUGUST 9, 2021; Aug 9, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to Postpone to October 11, 2021; Board Member Brooke Bailey seconds on a 10-0 vote; POSTPONED TO October 11, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not …
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet D-2 DATE: Monday September 13, 2021 CASE NUMBER: C15-2021-0085 ___-____Thomas Ates OUT ___-____Brooke Bailey OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Rahm McDaniel ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Agustina Rodriguez ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Vacant (Alternate) APPLICANT: David Cancialosi OWNER: Estates at Lake Austin, LP ADDRESS: 1717 CHANNEL RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (B) (1) (a) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback from 75 feet (required) to 25 feet (requested) along a man-made inlet in order to erect a Single-Family + associated improvements in a “LA”, Lake Austin zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: BOA MEETING SEPT 13, 2021 The public hearing was closed by Chair Jessica Cohen, Board Member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Postpone to October 11, 2021; Board Member Rahm McDaniel seconds on a 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 11, 2021. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: F-3/1 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: ______________________________ Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison ____________________________ Jessica Cohen Chair forF-3/2 PERMIT PARTNERS, LLC 300 E. Highland Mall Blvd Ste. 207 Austin, Texas 78752 David C. Cancialosi September 14, 2021 City of Austin 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, Texas 78701 City of Austin Board of Adjustment RE: Variance request for 1717 Channel Road to reduce 75’ Shoreline Setback to 25’ Shoreline Setback per LDC 25-2-551(B)(1)(a) – Amended cover letter for October meeting Dear Board of Adjustment Commissioners, Per your request please find a bullet point list containing reasonable use, hardship, adverse impact and other related information in a more definitive format. • The 1.7 ac tract (75,000 SF) tract was annexed into Austin jurisdiction in 1968 and zoned “A”, the equivalent of today’s “SF-2” or “SF3” zoning. This zoning was changed to “LA” in the early 1980’s by the city. The reasonable use …
BOA Monthly Report July 2021-June 2022 September 13, 2021 Granted 2 Postponed 1 Denied 1 Withdrawn 3 1) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum Lot Size requirements and 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback 2) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from: a) setback requirements to decrease the minimum Rear Yard Setback b) setback requirements to decrease the minimum Interior Side Yard Setback and 25-2-735 (Festival Beach Subdistrict Regulations) from c) impervious cover requirements to increase 1) 25-2-551 (Lake Austin District Regulations) (B) (1) (a) from shoreline setback requirements to reduce the shoreline setback 1) Subchapter F: Residential Design and Compatibility Standards, Article 2, Development Standards Section 2.1 (Maximum Development Permitted) to increase the F.A.R 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated, five (5) LED illuminated wall signs and one (1) internally illuminated cabinet wall sign 2) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from Impervious Cover requirements to increase 3) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback Discussion Items 6 Sept 2021. Interpretations 0 new inquiries The deposition of the case items: (Added Sept 13 # 2021) A. Granted 12 B. Postponed 16 C. Withdrawn 5 2 D. Denied E. Discussion Items 14 G-1/1 August 9, 2021 1) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum lot width 2) 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Front Yard Setback 3) 25-2-492 (D) (Site Development Regulations) to decrease the minimum lot size requirement 4) 25-2-773 (Duplex Residential Use) (B) (5) (b) from two stories (maximum allowed) to three stories Granted 4 Postponed 8 setback requirements to decrease the minimum Interior Side Yard Setback and from 25-2-735 (Festival Beach 1) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated, five (5) LED illuminated wall signs and one (1) internally illuminated cabinet wall sign 2) 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), a) (F) to allow three (3) wall signs above the second floor, one on each the northern, southern and eastern sides.b) (G) (1) one projecting sign for each building façade (allowed) to two (2) projecting signs (requested) on the eastern side c) (H) to allow for all twelve (12) signs, nine (9) on the …
§ 2-1-111 - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. (A) The Board of Adjustment is established as provided in Local Government Code Chapter 211 (Municipal Zoning Authority). (B) The board shall be composed of 11 members. (C) Each board member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (D) The council may appoint alternate board members to serve in the absence of regular members. An alternate member shall be appointed to serve a two-year term. (E) A regular or alternate board member may be removed by council for cause on a written charge after a public hearing. (F) The board shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) board. hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning), except as otherwise provided by the Code; hear and decide an appeal of an administrative action under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); hear and decide a request for a variance from the requirements of airport zoning regulations under Section 241.034, Local Government Code; hear and decide a request for a special exception under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); and perform other duties prescribed by ordinance or state law. (G) The board shall hold meetings at the call of the chairperson and at other times as requested by the (H) The chairperson, or the acting chairperson in the absence of the chairperson, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. (I) Each case before the board must be heard by at least 75 percent of the board members. (J) The concurring vote of 75 percent of the board members is necessary to: reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official; decide in favor of an applicant on a matter on which the board is required to pass under Chapter 25-2 (Zoning); or (3) authorize a variation from the terms of Chapter 25-2 (Zoning). (K) The board shall prepare minutes of its proceedings. The minutes shall include the vote of each member on each item before the board and shall state if a member is absent or fails to vote on an item. Source: Ord. 20071129-011; Ord. 20080110-048; Ord. 20080618-030; Ord. 20110526-098;Ord. No. 20141211-204, Pt. 14, 7-1-15. G-5/1 ARTICLE 3. - PROCEDURES FOR APPEALS Division 1. - Reserved.[2] Footnotes: --- (2) --- §§ 2-5-41—2-5-45. - RESERVED. Division 2. - Appeals. § 2-5-61 - GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR APPEALS. Editor's note— Ord. No. 20170518-014 >, Pt. 4, effective May 29, 2017, repealed §§ …
AGENDA MEETING MINUTES September 13, 2021 The Board of Adjustment meeting convened on Monday, September 13, 2021. Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Jessica Cohen (Chair) called the Board Meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. Board Members in Attendance (in person): Jessica Cohen (Chair), Rahm McDaniel, Richard Smith, Nicholl Wade, Kelly Blume (Alternate), Carrie Waller (Alternate) Board Members in Attendance (virtually via teleconference): Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair), Barbara Mcarthur, Darryl Pruett, Agustina Rodriguez, Michael Von Ohlen, Board Members Absent: Thomas Ates, Brooke Bailey City Staff in Attendance: Elaine Ramirez (Board Liaison) Lee Simmons (Board Attorney) City Staff Absent: Diana Ramirez (Board Secretary) EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda.NONE A. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM Staff requests approval August 9, 2021 draft minutes A-1 On-Line Link: Item A-1 A-1/1 Board Member Melissa Hawthorne motions to approve the minutes for August 9, 2021, Board member Richard Smith seconds on a 10-0-1 vote (Board member Melissa Hawthorne abstained for Items C-1, C-2); APPROVED MINUTES FOR August 9, 2021. B. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM B-1 Staff and Applicant requests for postponement and withdraw of items posted on this Agenda Items C-1, E-1 and E-2 applicant requests to withdraw C. SIGNS PREVIOUS POSTPONEMENTS C-1 C16-2021-0008 Leah M. Bojo for The Standard at Austin, LLC 715 W. 23rd Street On-Line Link: Item C-1 PART1; PART2; PART3; PART4; NO PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s), a total of 6 signs on the property from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs) (H) to allow for a total of six (6) signs to all be illuminated, five (5) LED illuminated wall signs and one (1) internally illuminated cabinet …
Austin Moxy Hotel 2552 Guadalupe Street Austin, Texas Exterior Building Signage City Presentation Babendure Design Group 8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950 Dallas, Texas 75231 214.265.1960 214.265.5552 (fax) www.babendure.com Signage & Wayfinding Design Specialists 1 D-1/1-PRESENTATION F E A B C D 5 4 1 3.2 3.1 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" Sign Location Plan 2 7 Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Existing single story building on adjacent lot (Owned by another party) Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020D-1/2-PRESENTATION 1 RESTAURANT IDENTITY Projecting Sign Box with push-through Restaurant Logo Top of Sign = 12’-8” above grade 3.1 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 3.2 MENU DISPLAY Located to left of windows. Top of Sign = 6’-0”above grade. 4 5 PICK UP WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. ORDER WINDOW IDENTITY Box sign with white push-through graphics. Top of Sign = 8’-0” above grade. BILLBOARD (Owned By Another Party) 1 A B 3.1 4 3.2 5 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0” 18'-3 1/2" (High Logo) 16'-3" (Low Logo) " 2 / 1 8 - ' 2 A Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 58’-8” above grade. " 6 - ' 1 " 2 / 1 4 - ' 2 B Dimensional Letters to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-8” above grade. D C Dimensional Letters mounted on the canopy ledge. Color to be Moxy pink. Top of Sign - 14’-2” above grade. Projecting Sign Box with push-through graphics. Logo to be Moxy pink day. Top of Sign - 22’-8” above grade. East Elevation High and Low Level Signs 3 Babendure Design Group8140 Walnut Hill Ln. #950Dallas, Texas 75231214.265.1960214.265.5552 (fax)www.babendure.comAustin Moxy HotelAustin, TexasExterior Building SignageNovember 18, 2020D-1/3-PRESENTATION 18'-3 1/2" 16'-3 1/2" " 8 / 1 8 - ' 2 " 2 / 1 7 - ' 3 A " 8 / 5 9 " 2 / 1 2 " 1 1 - ' 1 " 4 - ' 2 LOCATION A HIGH LEVEL WALL IDENTITY FRONT ELEVATION • AREA CALCULATION: 60 SQFT Top of Sign = 58’-8” above grade. SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0” 2 1/2" 6'-0" 5'-7" 1 3/4"Stroke Width 1" …
5700 Grover Ave. and 5612 Roosevelt Ave. Variance Request ‐ Multifamily C15‐2021‐0096 Board of Adjustment October 11, 2021 David Hartman 1 E-2/1-PRESENTATION Project Overview 4.135 acres, comprised of former Dart Bowl bowling alley at 5700 Grover Avenue and a vacant lot at 5612 Roosevelt Avenue. August 2021 City Council approved rezoning Ordinance No. 20210826‐099 that zoned the property MF‐6‐CO‐NP. Proposed Recreational Trail connects Woodrow Pocket Park/Recreational Trail to Roosevelt Avenue and Theckla Terrace. Voluntary 10% affordable housing, via recorded Private Restrictive Covenant with Habitat/HomeBase. Requesting following variances: • Maximum 8’ fence height along the western Property line adjacent to single family housing along Woodrow Avenue per agreement with Brentwood Neighborhood Association, and • Compatibility height standards related to adjacent McCallum High School tennis courts/running track/sports field located to the east of the Property along Grover Avenue.. 2 E-2/2-PRESENTATION Project Location 3 E-2/3-PRESENTATION Zoning Area Map MF‐3‐NP MF‐6‐CO‐NP 4 E-2/4-PRESENTATION Compatibility Constraints 5 E-2/5-PRESENTATION Compatibility Triggered by SF‐3 Zoning to East McCallum High School (Tennis Courts/Running Track/Baseball Field) 6 E-2/6-PRESENTATION Property Constraints 77 E-2/7-PRESENTATION
CITY OF AUSTIN Development Services Department Permitting & Development Center Phone: 512.978.4000 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr, Austin, Texas 78752 Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application WARNING: Filing of this appeal stops all affected construction activity. This application is a fillable PDF that can be completed electronically. To ensure your information is saved, click here to Save the form to your computer, then open your copy and continue. The Tab key may be used to navigate to each field; Shift + Tab moves to the previous field. The Enter key activates links, emails, and buttons. Use the Up & Down Arrow keys to scroll through drop-down lists and check boxes, and hit Enter to make a selection. The application must be complete and accurate prior to submittal. If more space is required, please complete Section 6 as needed. All information is required (if applicable). For Office Use Only Case # __________________ ROW # ___________________ Tax # ____________________ Section 1: Applicant Statement Street Address: __________________________________________________________________ Subdivision Legal Description: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Lot(s): _________________________________ Block(s): _____________________________ Outlot: _________________________________ Division: _____________________________ Zoning District: ___________________________________________________________________ I/We ________________________________________________ on behalf of myself/ourselves as authorized agent for ________________________________________________ affirm that on Month , Day , Year , hereby apply for a hearing before the Board of Adjustment for consideration to (select appropriate option below): Erect Attach Complete Remodel Maintain Other: ____________ Type of Structure: ______________________________________________________________ City of Austin | Board of Adjustment General/Parking Variance Application 06/24/2021 | Page 4 of 8 Portion of the City of Austin Land Development Code applicant is seeking a variance from: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Section 2: Variance Findings The Board must determine the existence of, sufficiency of, and weight of evidence supporting the findings described below. Therefore, you must complete each of the applicable Findings Statements as part of your application. Failure to do so may result in your application being rejected as incomplete. Please attach any additional supporting documents. NOTE: The Board cannot grant a variance that would provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated. I contend that my entitlement to the requested variance is based on the following findings: Reasonable Use The zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ Hardship a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: …
Item E-4 Case No. C15-2021-0098 McKinney Falls Apartments 5200 McKinney Falls Parkway Seeking variance from 25-2-1063(C) - Height Limitations and Setbacks for Large Sites October 11, 2021 E-4/1-PRESENTATION Overview To increase maximum height to 47’ when 50’ or less from triggering property (30’ required). To increase maximum height to 47’ when between 50-100’ from triggering property (40’ required). To increase maximum height to 47’ from 40’ plus one foot for each 10’ of distance in excess of 100’ from triggering property [achieves 47’ at 170’ setback] (required). 2 E-4/2-PRESENTATION Purpose: To construct 251 multifamily housing units. Zoning: MF-4 (approved September 2, 2021). Overview 3 E-4/3-PRESENTATION E-4/4-PRESENTATION Zoning Map 5 E-4/5-PRESENTATION Reasonable Use Multifamily development at this location is reasonable. No single-family uses in the vicinity. 6 E-4/6-PRESENTATION Reasonable Use Triggering property is state property that is not subject to City of Austin zoning regulation. Application of the zoning regulations significantly reduces the number of units that can be developed while not providing any protection to any single- family residential use or future use. 7 E-4/7-PRESENTATION Hardship Floodplain makes the southern end of the property less developable. The addition of the compatibility regulations reduce the buildable area by an additional 32.95%, making development infeasible. 8 E-4/8-PRESENTATION Floodplain Map 9 E-4/9-PRESENTATION E-4/10-PRESENTATION E-4/11-PRESENTATION Hardship Number of dwelling units on the tract is reduced from 251 to 188. Adjacent similarly shaped triangular tract to the southwest is distinguished from the subject tract because that tract is covered by floodplain; while the subject tract would be buildable if it were not subject to compatibility. 12 E-4/12-PRESENTATION Approval Does Not Alter Character of Neighborhood Multifamily use is a desirable and compatible use with the nearby McKinney Job Center and supported by Imagine Austin policies. Moderate density multifamily is suitable near arterial roadway (McKinney Falls Parkway). Multifamily use at this location is consistent with the purpose state of the MF-4 zoning district to provide residential units near employment opportunities. significant 13 E-4/13-PRESENTATION E-4/14-PRESENTATION 15 E-4/15-PRESENTATION
PERMIT PARTNERS, LLC 300 E. Highland Mall Blvd Ste. 207 Austin, Texas 78752 David C. Cancialosi September 1, 2021 City of Austin 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, Texas 78701 City of Austin Board of Adjustment RE: Variance request for site at 3401 Rivercrest Dr. to amend impervious cover – Amended cover letter for October meeting Dear Board of Adjustment Commissioners, Per your request please find a bullet point list containing reasonable use, hardship, adverse impact and other related information. The site is ~37,000 lot built atop a hill as part of the platted Rivercrest Section 2 subdivision approved in mid- 1960’s. It is comprised of two lots which combined and individually do not meet LA lot size requirements. The individual platted lots were legally compliant with “A” zoning in mid-1960’s; however, are sub-standard to LA zoning requirements: Individual nor combined, they do not have minimum 1 ac in size and doe not have 100’ along a public right-of-way as required by LA zoning performance standards. The site was originally zoned “A” when COA asserted control over this area. In 1984, COA changed zoning to LA, which changed “A” zoned, legally compliant lots along the lake to a legal non-compliant lot (re: size) and associated structures (re: IC). Owner wishes to exercise reasonable use as intended by both the original plat and zoning change approval asserted by local jurisdictions to allow single-family house and associated accessory improvements. Current home is in need of repair and updating. Main concern is structural integrity of retaining walls surrounding hillside. Please see attached drainage letter per your request at August hearing. Rerouting the retaining walls and placement of new walls is necessary. This request is to amend impervious coverage calculations to 1) meet the actual LA code requirements and 2) correct erroneous permit issuance and inspection passage occurring in 2006. When COA forced LA zoning on this property it made site immediately non-compliant with respect, mostly, to impervious coverage. It was unbuildable by any reasonable standards. The subsequent 2006 permit approval exacerbated this issue. In 2006 COA approved extensive plans for new construction via permit #2006-002550, albeit erroneously. This approval was issued accordingly to SF-2 zoning standards. SF-2 zoning allows one to count the gross lot area of the entire ~37,000 SF lot (which approved 16% IC of gross lot area coverage per said application); however, LA zoning requires one to delineate calculations on a …
1717 CHANNEL ROAD AUSTIN, TX 78746 Case # 2021-000072 BA F-3/1-PRESENTATION VARIANCE REQUEST I. Seeking BOA Variance to reduce shoreline setback: • LDC 25-2-551(B)(1)(a) to reduce shoreline setback from 75’ to 25’ along a man-made slough that abuts the property via cut in boat slip. • Lake Austin shoreline setback is 75’ per staff’s current interpretation of where a shoreline setback is measured from as it relates to man made sloughs or inlets. • My client is seeking a 25’ Lake Austin shoreline setback from the slough. • The man-made slough has a cut-in slip created sometime between1955 and 1968 per City of Austin zoning profile aerials. • There does not appear to be any natural causation of the inlet. It appears wholly man made using various historical aerials and physical inspections. F-3/2-PRESENTATION AERIAL F-3/3-PRESENTATION MAP AERIAL F-3/4-PRESENTATION CHANNEL RD + ENTRANCE TO SITE Easement to 1717 F-3/5-PRESENTATION VARIOUS INLET ANGLES F-3/6-PRESENTATION VARIOUS INLET AND CHANNEL ANGLES F-3/7-PRESENTATION VARIOUS PROPERTY ANGLES FROM INLET F-3/8-PRESENTATION VARIOUS PROPERTY ANGLES AROUND INLET F-3/9-PRESENTATION EASEMENT THAT SPLITS PROPERTY F-3/10-PRESENTATION CHANNEL TO / FROM LAGOON – LAKE AUSTIN F-3/11-PRESENTATION REASONABLE USE The zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: • The zoning regulations combined with unique hardships prevent a reasonable use of this site as prescribed by the applicable zoning district. • The existing 1.72-acre tract is vacant and zoned Lake Austin, LA, as part of the City-wide effort to apply LA zoning to lake properties in 1984. The site was annexed June 15, 1968, and zoned “A” zoning which is the equivalent of today’s SF-2 zoning. The site does not front the main body of Lake Austin. It is only accessible to the water via a small inlet that connects to a lagoon. From that lagoon a straight line was dredged to the site. On the other side of the lagoon, it connects to the main body of Lake Austin via separate canal (from the lagoon). That canal travels under a bridge (Channel Road), then it connects to the main body. (please see aerial maps for quick reference). We believe the cut-in slip was created during the same time period as the actual inlet because the 1955 – 1968 aerials reflect the inlet being dredged from the lagoon during this time and not in any aerials before 1955. It shows the inlet in the same location between …
AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT October 11, 2021at 5:30PM Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the Board of Adjustment may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live ___Agustina Rodriguez ___Richard Smith ___Michael Von Ohlen ___Nicholl Wade ___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Vacant (Alternate) ___Thomas Ates ___Brooke Bailey ___Jessica Cohen (Chair) ___Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair) ___Barbara Mcarthur ___Rahm McDaniel ___Darryl Pruett EXECUTIVE SESSION (No public discussion) The Board of Adjustment will announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, to receive advice from Legal Counsel on matters specifically listed on this agenda. The Board of Adjustment may also announce it will go into Executive Session, if necessary, to receive advice from Legal Counsel regarding any other item on this agenda. Private Consultation with Attorney – Section 551.071 CALL TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. A. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM Staff requests approval September 13, 2021 draft minutes A-1 On-Line Link: Item A-1 B. C. D. DISCUSSION AND REQUESTED ACTION ITEM B-1 Staff and Applicant requests for postponement and withdraw of items posted on this Agenda SIGNS NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS C-1 C16-2021-0011 Renee Bornn for Villas Rio, LP 2111 Rio Grande Street On-Line Link: Item C-1; NO PRESENTATION; AE REPORT The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-133 (University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning District Signs), requesting a total of 1 sign(s) on the property: a) (F) to allow one (1) wall signs above the second floor (maximum allowed) to the eight floor (requested) b) (H) to allow for the one (1) sign(s) to all be illuminated in order to provide signage for the Villas on Rio Grande in a “GO-MU, LO-NP, MF-4-NP”, General Office-Mixed Use, Limited Office, Multi-Family– Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (West University Neighborhood Plan) Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-133 University Neighborhood Overlay Zoning Districts Signs (F) No signs may be placed above the second floor of a building, except for a non- electric sign that is engraved, cut into the building surface, or otherwise inlaid to become part of the building. …
October 5, 2021 Renee Bornn, Building Image Group 2111 Rio Grande St Bldg Flr8 Austin TX, 78705 Property Description: LT 1-3 OLT 23-1/2 DIV D HORSTS LOUIS SUBD Re: C16-2021-0011 Dear Renee, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from LCD Sign Regulations in order to place an illuminated sign on the 8th floor. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Joseph Beeler, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6602
October 5, 2021 Janis Smith PE 8818 Big View Dr Bldg 4 Austin TX, 78730 Re: C15-2021-0093 Property Description: LOT 4 BLK A PANTHER HOLLOW CREEK PHS II Dear Janis, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance(s) from LCD 25-2- 1176(A)(1) – to allow for construction of a boat dock 50 feet from the shoreline. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Joseph Beeler, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6602
