All documents

RSS feed for this page

Music CommissionApril 1, 2024

Supporting Documents original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

Live Music Venue and Creative Space Regulatory Incentives Phase II April 2024 Council Actions Resolution No. 20220728-094:  Establish the criteria to be a Live Music Venue  Create live music venue bonus and incentive program for new and existing venues,  Initiate changes to Land Development Code Section 25 Resolution No. 20220901-089:  Develop and adopt clear creative space land use definitions  Create creative space bonus and incentive program for new and existing including venues  Create new code elements to "Diversify, sustain, and cultivate the city's culture, music, and arts communities and industries“  Criteria for designation of Arts Districts  Initiate changes to Land Development Code Section 25 Resolution No. 20230921-102:  Develop LDC amendments with incentives for cultural space preservation and creation by Spring 2024  Bring an ordinance establishing a Cultural District Overlay initiated in Resolution No. 20220728-094 and Resolution No. 20220901-089 by Spring 2024 Guidance from Resolutions Resolution No. 20220728-094:  Fee Waivers  Modified Parking requirements  Expanded facilitation of affordable commercial space... in new construction  Prioritization of music venue or creative space as a community benefit for density bonuses or other overlays within the Red River Cultural District, East 6th Street Entertainment District, and Warehouse Entertainment District Resolution No. 20220901-089:  Fee waivers  Modified parking requirements  Expedited permitting process  "increase in floor to area ratio (FAR) in square footage or other appropriate development incentive related to what is provided for the dedicated creative space"  "Prioritization of creative space as a city-wide community benefit as it relates to density bonus programs, Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning, or within other regulatory plans  Increased flexibility in development regulations and opportunities for modification of policies, rules, codes, or design standards  Permit accessory use as a theater, art gallery, or art workshop in all commercial and industrial/warehousing zoning districts Goals and Timeline Goals  Develop a paper district that is not mapped; no change to a property’s zoning will be made through initial district adoption  Aggressive timeline to meet Spring goal  After adoption, owners of eligible properties may then request a rezoning to incorporate “Creative District (CD)” code string Milestones  Arts Commission: March 18 present  Music Commission: April 1  Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee (COJC): March 20  Recommended for adoption through unanimous vote of members  City Council Set Date: April 18 (May …

Scraped at: March 29, 2024, 11 p.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Draft Meeting Minutes March 4, 2024 original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

Public Safety Commission Meeting Minutes Monday, March 4, 2024 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR CALLED MEETING MINUTES Monday, March 4, 2024 The Public Safety Commission convened in a regular called meeting on Monday, March 4, 2024, at City Hall Building, Boards and Commissions Room, 301 W 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Ramírez called the Public Safety Commission Meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Commissioners in Attendance: Nelly Paulina Ramírez, Chair Rebecca Bernhardt, Vice-Chair David Holmes Pierre Nguyễn Kristy Orr Angelica Reyes Timothy Ruttan Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Yasmine Smith PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Stephanie Ryan – support for APD Ruth Moonesinghe – death of her son, Raj Moonesinghe Carlos Leon – APD and CapMetro complaints APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Public Safety Commission regular meeting on February 5, 2024. The minutes from the meeting of 02/05/2024, were approved on Commissioner Bernhardt’s motion, Commissioner Nguyễn’s second on an 8-0 vote. Commissioners Hall-Martin and Hermesmeyer were absent. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. Presentation by Teresa Gardner, Austin Travis County Emergency Medical Services (ATCEMS) Chief of Staff regarding the Austin Travis County EMS Quarterly Report. 1 Public Safety Commission Meeting Minutes Monday, March 4, 2024 Presentation was given by Stephen White, Acting Assistant Chief of Integrated Services. 3. Presentations by Chief of Staff Jeff Greenwalt, Austin Police Department; Chief of Staff Teresa Gardner, Austin Travis County Emergency Medical Services; and Chief of Staff Rob Vire, Austin Fire Department; Texas Harm Reduction Alliance and Vocal Texas on opioid use hot spots, prevention, and education efforts. Presentations were given by Stephen White, EMS Acting Assistant Chief of Integrated Services; Angela Carr, EMS Division Chief; Mike Sasser, EMS Captain; Cate Graziani, Vocal Texas; and Gaby Libretti, Texas Harm Reduction Alliance. Commissioner Smith requested EMS follow up to include: -geographical locations of the Pop Up Resource Clinics (PURC) and their outreach strategies -a map of the interventions administered through the Buprenorphine Bridge Program (BBP) -zip code data for where the rescue kits are distributed and where Narcan is administered prior to EMS arrival -data included on the Austin Public Health Opioid Overdose Dashboard for overdose calls that result in an arrest 4. Presentations by Chief of Staff Jeff Greenwalt, Austin Police Department; Chief of Staff Teresa Gardner, Austin Travis County Emergency Medical Services; and Chief of Staff Rob Vire, Austin Fire Department regarding electronic payroll system rollout. Presentations were given by Jeff Greenwalt, Chief of Staff, …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #2 Public Safety Quarterly Report - APD original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 19 pages

Austin Police Department Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Presentation • • • Section 1: Crimes Against Persons Section 4: Community Engagement Section 2: Crimes Against Property/Society Section 5: Budget Section 3: Response Times & Call Volumes Section 6: Staffing & Vacancies • • • APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit Slide 1 Crimes Against Persons by Offense Type FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 | FY2024 Q2* vs. 5-Year Mean (Q2) Crimes Against Persons Offense Type 5-Year Mean (FY2019-2023 Q2) FY2023 Q2 FY2024 Q2* 1-Year Change Difference from 5-Year Mean Assault Offenses (13A, 13B, 13C) 4,477 4,233 3,500 Homicide Offenses (09A, 09B) Kidnapping/Abduction (100) Sex Offenses (11A, 11B, 11C, 11D, 36A, 36B) Other Crimes Against Persons (64A, 64B) 16 46 232 3 22 52 202 3 12 46 148 1 -17% -45% -12% -27% -67% Total Crimes Against Persons 4,774 4,512 3,707 -18% -22% *Data for FY2024 Q2 only available through March 20, 2024 APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit -22% -25% 0% -36% -67% Slide 2 Crimes Against Persons by APD Sector FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 Crimes Against Persons APD Sector FY2023 Q2 FY2024 Q2* Adam Baker Charlie David Edward Frank George Henry Ida Other Total 446 392 494 501 769 641 347 499 376 48 381 312 407 383 630 493 262 462 345 33 4,513 3,708 Percent Change -15% -20% -18% -24% -18% -23% -24% -7% -8% -31% -18% APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit Change from FY2023 to FY2024 (Q2) *Data for FY2024 Q2 only available through March 20, 2024 Slide 3 Crimes Against Persons by City Council District FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 Crimes Against Persons City Council District FY2023 Q2 FY2024 Q2* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Percent Change -20% -20% -10% -16% -27% -22% 4% -30% -28% -14% 454 445 626 625 223 158 356 106 520 168 569 557 696 741 307 202 341 151 721 196 4,481 3,681 -18% APD Public Safety Commission – FY2024 Q2 Data compiled by APD Research & Planning unit Change from FY2023 to FY2024 (Q2) *Data for FY2024 Q2 only available through March 20, 2024 Slide 4 Crimes Against Persons Density (“Hotspots”) FY2024 Q2* vs. FY2023 Q2 Crimes Against Persons FY2023 Q2 …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #4 Biannual Wildfire Readiness - AFD original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 9 pages

A U STI N FI RE DEP AR TMENT Wildfire Readiness Update Jeffrey Kennedy– Assistant Chief Justice Jones – Wildfire Mitigation Officer BE IT RESOLVED... "Provide a progress report every six months to the Public Safety Commission for the following important components of a comprehensive WUI risk reduction plan." Council Resolution NO. 20160512-016 The information presented in this update are maintained in real-time through dynamic data 1 Wildfire Readiness Update 1. The number of local CWPP’s completed and implemented. 2. The number of local CWPP's started but not completed. 3. The percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is ongoing. 4. The number of public presentations and home assessments provided. 5. The number, size, type and location of fuel mitigation activities conducted. 6. The number of training hours received and conducted. 2 1) The number of local CWPP's completed and implemented is 23. Local level CWPP’s are community led initiatives that AFD facilitates and supports. The Division has hired a new FAC coordinator that is working to engage new communities for FY24. AU STI N CW PP ’s 3 2) The number of local CWPP's started but not completed is 23. Local level CWPP’s are community led initiatives that AFD facilitates and supports. Three of these communities have re-engaged with AFD in the last six months. Acti ve & Eng aged Sentence or subheading goes Here on the page in the header box. 4 3) The percentage of high-risk WUI areas in which identification of potential local CWPP planning areas is still ongoing is 49%. Of the 14% of Austin classified as high risk, 51% is covered by a local level CWPP, 49% are identified as opportunity zones. H igh R is k A reas 5 4) The number of public presentations and home assessments provided in the past 6 months. 8 Presentations and events, including virtual events such as the annual Wildfire Symposium held virtually, and 3 home assessments provided. O utreac h Acti vitie s 6 5) The number, size, type and location of fuel mitigation activities conducted in the past 6 months. 5 Prescribed fires (1,056 ac) completed, by assisting partner agencies. F u e l M i t i g a t i o n 7 6) The number of training hours received and conducted in the past six months. 40 Training hours received and 2,233 training hours conducted …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #6 Recommendation 20240306-004 Collective Sex Crimes Response Model CSCRM - Commission for Women original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

COMMISSION FOR WOMEN RECOMMENDATION Commission for Women Recommendation Number 20240306-004: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Funding for Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) Actions WHEREAS, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and WHEREAS, in September 2019, the City Manager’s Office contracted the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), in conjunction with the Women’s Law Project and the Wellesley Centers for Women, to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the way sexual assaults reported to the Austin Police Department (APD) are investigated and processed; and WHEREAS, sexual assault lawsuits were filed and settlements were approved for Smith et. al. vs City of Austin and Senko et. al. vs City of Austin; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2022, the final PERF report was released, Austin Police Department (APD) Review, Reported Sexual Assault Comprehensive Evaluation, and included comprehensive findings and over one hundred recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Austin Police Department worked with the Austin/Travis County Sexual Assault Response and Resource Team (SARRT) to address the PERF recommendations and take actions, including revisions to APD policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) was established in early 2023 to coordinate the full response to the PERF report, and includes representatives from APD, SARRT, nonprofit and community organizations, survivors and survivor advocates; and WHEREAS, the Commission for Women and Public Safety Commission formed a joint working group in 2023 to support and track the work of the CSCRM and report progress to their respective commissions; and WHEREAS, the work of the CSCRM is significant in scope, spanning multiple working groups, and has identified serious unmet funding requirements and additional needs for fiscal year 2024- 2025; and WHEREAS, funding has been allocated to support APD comprehensive sexual assault/trauma curriculum development and delivery, additional detective hours on misdemeanor and cold cases, the hiring of a CSCRM project manager, the implementation of a survivor survey and a stipend for volunteer project members, among others; and WHEREAS, law enforcement staffing shortages and hiring challenges are impacting support for survivors of sexual assault, and training and increased financial support and innovative approaches are needed to overcome these shortfalls; and WHEREAS, the SAFE Alliance forensic nursing program is …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 12:10 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Combining District & Density Bonus Pre Adoption Draft original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 49 pages

SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM DRAFT – March 27, 2024 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF AUSTIN Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 1 of 49 This page intentionally left blank. Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 2 of 49 Contents BACKGROUND. .............................................................................................................................................. 6 USING THIS DOCUMENT. .............................................................................................................................. 8 Applicability............................................................................................................................................... 8 Organization .............................................................................................................................................. 8 ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS. ............................................................................................................. 10 1.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Applicability. ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.1. Conflicting Provisions. ............................................................................................................... 11 1.3. Application and Review Requirements. ........................................................................................... 11 1.3.1. Development Services Department Director’s Administration. ............................................... 11 1.4. Text, Graphics, and Maps. ................................................................................................................ 11 1.5. Density Bonus Program Evaluation. ................................................................................................. 11 ARTICLE 2: LAND USE STANDARDS. ............................................................................................................ 12 2.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Applicability. ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Land Uses. ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1. Permitted (P), Permitted with Conditions (PC), and Conditional Uses (C). .............................. 12 2.3.2. Pedestrian-Oriented Building Frontage Uses. ........................................................................... 16 ARTICLE 3: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. .................................................................................................... 17 3.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2. South Central Waterfront Overlays. ................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1. Waterfront Overlay (WO) Combining District. ........................................................................... 17 3.2.2. South Shore Subdistrict. ............................................................................................................ 18 3.2.3. Travis Heights Subdistrict. ......................................................................................................... 18 3.2.4. Auditorium Shores Subdistrict. .................................................................................................. 18 3.3. Allowed Density. .............................................................................................................................. 18 3.3.1. Units per Acre. .......................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.2. Floor-to-Area Ratios by Subdistrict. .......................................................................................... 18 3.3.3. Lot Size. ..................................................................................................................................... 20 3.3.4. Impervious Cover and Building Coverage. ................................................................................ 20 3.4. Building Setbacks ............................................................................................................................. 20 3.5. Floor-to-Area Ratio Calculation. ...................................................................................................... 21 Draft for Adoption Process (3.27.24) City of Austin Page 3 of 49 3.5.1. Density Distribution Areas. ....................................................................................................... 21 3.5.2. Floor-to-Area Ratio Calculation for Structured Parking. ........................................................... 22 3.5.3. Floor-to-Area Ratio and Dedication of Land. ............................................................................ 22 3.6. Parking. ............................................................................................................................................ 22 3.6.1. Vehicle Parking .......................................................................................................................... 22 3.6.2. Bicycle Parking. ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.7. Required Open Space. ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.8. Compatibility Standards. .................................................................................................................. 24 ARTICLE 4: DESIGN STANDARDS ................................................................................................................. 25 4.1. Intent. ............................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2. Streetscape & Built Environment Requirements. ............................................................................ 25 4.3. Right of Way Standards. ................................................................................................................... 25 4.4. Internal Circulation Routes. ............................................................................................................. 25 4.4.1. Internal Circulation Route Option 1: ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.2. Internal Circulation Route Option 2: ......................................................................................... 25 4.4.3. Internal Circulation Route Option 3: ......................................................................................... 26 4.4.4. Internal Circulation Route Option 4: ......................................................................................... 27 4.5. Supplemental Zones......................................................................................................................... 27 4.5.1. Supplemental Zone Standards. ................................................................................................. 27 ARTICLE 5: DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................. 29 SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM .................................................................... 30 1. Intent. .................................................................................................................................................. 30 2. Applicability. ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3. Program Overview. ............................................................................................................................. 30 4. South Central Waterfront Subdistricts …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Highlights of South Central Waterfront Change Log original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Key Adjustments to the South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program March 27, 2024 The South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus program underwent a one-month public input process. As a result, feedback was provided by community members, Boards and Commissions, staff, and other stakeholders. Staff consolidated and assessed the feedback to determine recommended adjustments to the draft code for the South Central Waterfront. The following is a list of the key changes made in the draft code as a result of the discussion, using the following key as the source of the adjustment: Boards and Commissions, Public Input, and/or Staff. Key: Source of Input Boards and Commissions Public Staff District Boundary and Subdistricts Source Adjustment Section 1.2 Section 3.3.2 District boundaries were further expanded to include three properties on the western side of the South Central Waterfront. See the updated map for detail. To underscore the commitment to transit-oriented development in the area, the FAR was adjusted to properties near to the proposed Project Connect station on the north side of East Riverside Drive. See the updated map for detail. Height limits have been added to Subdistricts 1 through 4. They are: 1 - 120', 2 - 240', 3 - 300', 4 - 600'. Subdistrict 5 remains with unlimited height. This adjustment reinforces and improves the density gradient from the closest areas to downtown being the most dense, and for the density to transition down as one moves further away from downtown. Section 3.3.2 - 1 - Land Use Source Adjustment Cocktail Lounges above 3,500sf in size will trigger the need for a conditional use permit. The conditional use permit process will better assist in the review and regulation of entertainment / nightlife noise disturbances. The Custom Manufacturing land use has been limited to 2,500sf. The limitation will deter larger single-purpose land uses and encourage more flexible development that supports smaller creative businesses. Section 2.3.1(C)(4) Section 2.3.1(D)(1) Adjustment Section 2.7(C) Section 4.4.3 Shade provisions increased for cantilevered, affixed, and freestanding options. Trees will still be the dominant shade mechanism, but this change allows for strong urban design and diversity in design of the urban space. This is also consistent with activities in other urban areas in the city. An additional internal circulation route type with a bicycle lane was added. This addition increases bicycle connectivity within the South Central Waterfront area and facilitates safe separation of …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Item 3 Draft Recommendation for the financial value of community benefits to meet bonus requirements original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

[BOARD/COMMISSION NAME] RECOMMENDATION 20240501-XXX [XXX is the agenda item number] Isaac Cohen SCW Combining district Date: Mar 26, 2023 Subject: Motioned By: Recommendation Regarding the financial value of community benefits to meet bonus requirements, benefits that meet certain criteria should carry stackable bonuses or value multipliers that provide developers with an outsized financial incentive to provide them. Criteria for bonus multipliers are listed below:  Permanent benefits with appropriate long-term/permanent easements  Publicly accessible space that does not serve as access to retail storefronts where any of the following Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell apply (may require coordination across multiple lots to be met).  It is adjacent to the lakefront trail, transit stations, or Bouldin Creek.  It is a contiguous green space with a trail providing a shorter path from endpoint to endpoint than streets (including inter-DDA). or a transit station (bus or rail). (Sq Ft number TBD)  Connects from a pedestrian accessible street to the Town Lake Waterfront, West Bouldin Creek,  Publicly accessible green space that meets a square footage minimum to represent a high-value park  Specific kinds of transit-supportive infrastructure that uniquely enables transit use, such as the examples below.  Larger than typical publicly accessible shelters  Publicly accessible restrooms  Transit interconnection hubs for ride-share or private bus lines to be able to drop off and pick up.  Infrastructure that uniquely enables multi-modal and accessible transport from the new rail station to destinations west of the station along Riverside and Barton Springs Road, namely  Palmer Events center  Long Center  Auditorium shores  Zilker Park/Barton Springs. Description of Recommendation to Council Value multipliers for certain benefits will incentivize either uniquely large, uniquely useful, or uniquely desirable permanent community benefits as opposed to smaller, disjointed, lower-value benefits. Rationale: The current staff recommendation does not articulate the valuation process for community benefits. It appears unopinionated as to how the requirement is met if the numerical monetary requirement is achieved. The current approach allows a developer to decide which benefits to provide without appropriate incentives for benefits that may require more work, permanent easements, or cooperation and planning across multiple lots. By delivering higher value via multipliers to permanent benefits that are 1 of 2 uniquely beneficial and possible in certain areas and combining these multipliers with the ability to do transferrable development rights, we can create the appropriate economic benefits to …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Item 3 Draft Recommendation to Amend the Boundaries of the Housing Fee Spending Area original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to amend the boundaries of the Housing Fee Spending Area within SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM Ryan Puzycki Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell Motioned By: Description of Recommendation to Council Redefine the South Central Waterfront Housing Fee Spending Area to be within the walkshed of the district and current or planned transit lines transecting or terminating in the district, bound by the borders defined in Section 6.4.E.1.b. Rationale: Housing Trust funds used toward creating affordable housing units for the South Central Waterfront District must be used within the district or within walking distance of the district and nearby transit. Vote For: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: [Staff or board member can sign] 1 of 1

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Item 3 Draft Recommendation to Remove or Exclude Height Limits original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to remove or exclude height limits from the SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM Ryan Puzycki Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell Motioned By: Description of Recommendation to Council Height limits should be removed or excluded from the South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program. Rationale: Given the difficulty of predicting future market conditions, the decades-long redevelopment timeline for the district, the significant variability of parcel sizes within the district, and the other prescriptions in the South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program, arbitrary height limits would serve to limit flexibility and adaptability to future market conditions, particularly on smaller parcels. As a transit-connected district facing Downtown, a significant portion of which already falls within the Downtown Public Improvement District, the South Central Waterfront will become an integrated extension of Downtown over time. The Core/Waterfront and Rainey Street Districts in the Downtown Austin Plan, which comprise the northern banks opposite the South Central Waterfront, are also not subject to height limits but remain regulated by FAR limits. Vote For: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: [Staff or board member can sign] 1 of 1

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Item 3 Draft Recommendation to to amend SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 1 page

South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to amend SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM to direct the Director of the Housing Department to allocate funds from the Housing Trust Fund Fee-in-Lieu to purchase existing housing units within a refined Affordable Housing Fee Spending Area Ryan Puzycki Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell Motioned By: Description of Recommendation to Council Proceeds allocated to the Housing Trust Fund Fee-in-Lieu should be spent to purchase existing housing stock within a refined Affordable Housing Fee Spending Area, as defined by the walkshed of the district and current or planned transit lines transecting or terminating in the district, bound by the borders defined in Section 6.4.E.1.b. Rationale: Given the high cost of building new housing units, affordable or otherwise, in the South Central Waterfront District, the city should allocate funds from the Housing Trust to purchase existing, cheaper housing units within or as close to the district and nearby transit as possible. Vote For: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: [Staff or board member can sign] 1 of 1

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

South Central Waterfront Adoption Presentation original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program SCWAB April 1, 2024 South Central Waterfront Vision Framework Plan Adopted June 6, 2016 City Council Resolution 20220915-090 Initiated the creation of an “Optional Regulating Plan” later changed to a Combining District and Density Bonus Program. 2 Approach Since Council Resolution  The SCW regulations will be implemented by: – Council adoption of an optional set of regulations and bonus program through the creation of a Combining District and a Density Bonus Program (spring 2024). – City-initiated rezoning of non PDA, PUD, and Planned Development Agreement properties in the district (summer 2024).  First reevaluation within 1-2 years. 3 District Boundary Expansion 4 Combining District Density Bonus General Provisions (Policies, procedures, and who can participate) Land Use Standards (Permitted and conditional land uses) Development Standards (What can be built and where) Design Standards (How it will look) Definitions Procedures/Requirements “Gate Keeper” Requirements – – – Affordable Housing Environmental Protection Improved Streetscape and Built Environment In-Lieu Fees and Dedications On-Site Community Benefits Eligible for Bonus Area 5 5 Subdistricts and FAR Council approval is required to exceed FAR maximums and heights Density Distribution Areas (DDAs) • FAR maximums apply to each DDA separately. • No larger than 90,000 sq. ft. • Internal circulation routes required along DDA divisions. Project Connect Rail Alignment 6 Bonus Program Structure (For Additional FAR Beyond Base) Gate Keeper Requirements Onsite Affordable Housing (Fee for Non-Residential) Enhanced Environmental Protections Streetscape & Built Environment First Then (To Reach Up to FAR / Height Subdistrict Maximums) 70% In-Lieu Fees & Dedications Affordable Housing (extra on-site affordable units credited; Affordable Housing Investment Area) Parks (dedications credited; boundary as defined by typical Parks fees) Infrastructure (supports SCW directly) 30% On-Site Community Benefits *Affordable Creative Space Open Space & Park Buildout Child / Adult Care Cultural Uses Transit-Supportive Infrastructure Grocery Store Music Venues Public Art 7 Affordable Housing 5% of housing on-site up to 3:1 FAR must be affordable. May be: At full buildout, it is estimated: The SCW Bonus Program could produce – Affordable rental units at 60% MFI, – Or if Condos: 481 On-site Affordable Units compared to – Affordable ownership units (condos) at 80% MFI, or – A fee-in-lieu for ownership units. 527 Affordable Units anticipated in the 2016 Vision Plan. 8 ^ *For artistic rendering purposes only ^ Required dispersion of affordable units throughout the residential units Key* Recommended …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
South Central Waterfront Advisory BoardApril 1, 2024

Staff Report original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

C20-2022-003 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REVIEW SHEET C20-2022-003 South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program. Amendment: Description: Conduct a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending City Code Title 25 to create a new zoning district and modify related site development regulations and compatibility standards; and create a new zoning district for density bonus that includes granting additional floor-to-area ratio in exchange for providing community benefits; to establish boundaries for the new zoning districts located in the vicinity commonly known as the South Central Waterfront; and initiating zoning and rezoning for all properties within the South Central Waterfront District except those with Planned Unit Development zoning, Planned Development Area zoning, and subject to Planned Development Agreement, and initiate necessary neighborhood plan amendments for the properties located in the new zoning district’s boundaries. Background: On June 16, 2016, the South Central Waterfront Vision Framework Plan (Vision Plan) was adopted as an amendment to the Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan. As defined in the Vision Plan, the South Central Waterfront district encompasses roughly 118 acres. The intent of the Vision Plan was to leverage forecasted development through a districtwide approach that creates a dynamic people-centered district in Central Austin by: - Establishing a lively, attractive pedestrian environment; - Expanding open space and creating great public places; - Enhancing connections to and along the waterfront; and - Providing 20% new affordable housing units, or approximately 527 affordable units in the district. A districtwide approach had been identified as an essential method in realizing the intent of the Vision Plan. Through this approach, the South Central Waterfront is hoped to become a model for how a districtwide green infrastructure system, paired with quality urban design, can provide an interconnected network of public spaces – streets, streetscapes, lakeside trails, and parks – that provides the framework for redevelopment and districtwide value capture to fund other community benefits, such as affordable housing. The urban development envisioned in the Vision Plan requires modifications to the existing zoning and development regulations. To support the development envisioned in the Vision Plan, the City Council passed Resolution Number 20220915-090 on September 15, 2022, to initiate the development of regulations for the South Central Waterfront area. In the resolution, Council asked staff to create regulations that consider today’s market realities, anticipate future demand, and realize the intent of the Vision Plan to: 1 C20-2022-003 - Create a density bonus program “akin” to …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 1 a.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item1_2024-3-20-DraftMINUTES original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

Meeting of the Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee March 20, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. Permitting and Development Center (PDC) – Room #2103 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the Codes and Ordinances Joint Committee may be participating in the video conference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once, either in-person or remotely, and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To at 512-974-7288 or email Jordan.Feldman@austintexas.gov. Jordan Feldman, the board call or register, liaison, COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT Claire Hempel (Chair) Alejandra Flores (Vice-Chair) Greg Anderson Felicity Maxwell Lonny Stern COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT Awais Azhar Betsy Greenberg CITY STAFF PRESENT Jordan Feldman, Planning Department Paul Books, Planning Department Donald Jackson, Economic Development Department CALL TO ORDER Chair Hempel called the meeting to order at 6:04 pm. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL 1 DRAFT Speakers signed up prior to commencement of the meeting will be allowed to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. No speakers signed up for public communication. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the February 21, 2024, meeting minutes. On a motion by Vice Chair Flores, seconded by Commissioner Maxwell, the minutes from the February 21st, 2024, meeting were approved unanimously (5-0) with Commissioners Greenberg and Azhar absent. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 2. C20-2023-026 Live Music and Creative Space Bonus Phase 2. Discussion and possible action to recommend amendments to City Code Title 25 (Land Development) to create a Creative Combining District and Development Bonus Program to enhance the development and preservation of live music venues and creative sector businesses. City Staff: Donald Jackson, Economic Development Department, (512) 974- 2214, DonaldE.Jackson@austintexas.gov. Chair Hempel motion to recommend the amendment to Planning Commission seconded by Commissioner Maxwell 5-0, Commissioners Greenberg Azhar absent. 3. Update on Potential Upcoming and Active Code Amendments: City Staff: Jordan Feldman, Planning Department, (512) 974-7288, Jordan.Feldman@austintexas.gov. DISCUSSION ITEMS Jordan Feldman presented. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 7:19 pm. The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days before …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 2:50 a.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item2_SCW AIS_signed original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 4 pages

Affordability Impact Statement South Central Waterfront Combining District and Density Bonus Program Case number: C20-2022-003 Date: March 27, 2024 Proposed Regulation • The proposed code amendments will create the South Central Waterfront Combining District (SCWCD) and the South Central Waterfront Density Bonus (SCWDB). The SCWCD is established to implement the intent of the 2016 South Central Waterfront Vision Framework Plan (Vision Plan). The SCWDB will allow for additional density beyond the South Central Waterfront SCWCD standard regulation in exchange for implementing certain design criteria and providing community benefits. • The affordable housing component includes: o Require 5% of housing on-site within 3:1 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) must be affordable  For rental units: • 60% MFI; or  For ownership units: • 80% of ownership units; or • A fee in lieu equivalent to the otherwise required on-site set-aside percentage of the total residential units, including the mix of bedrooms required, at the rate set in the fee schedule at the time of final site plan submission. • Apart from meeting the on-site requirements within the 3:1 FAR, up to 70% of the additional bonus area can be attained through fees-in-lieu and dedications. These fees-in-lieu will be equally allocated among affordable housing, parks, and infrastructure. • The funds designated for affordable housing will be spent within a boundary delineated by Ladybird Lake to the North, E Ben White to the South, IH-35 to the East, and MoPac to the West and within a ½ mile of a rail stop or ¼ mile of a bus stop. • Recently, the City Council approved changes to City Code Chapter 4-18, impacting both residential and non-residential redevelopment. These changes included regulations for density bonus programs, with specific focus on residential redevelopment requirements. Initially, the ordinance called for the replacement of all units affordable to households earning 80% or less of the Median Family Income (MFI). However, subsequent collaboration among various City departments led staff to conclude that a more finely-tuned threshold for triggering unit replacement under this requirement would be to replace existing units affordable to a household earning 60% MFI or below. This adjustment aligns with the goals outlined in the Strategic Housing Blueprint, prioritizing deeper levels of affordability, and aiming to enhance participation in density bonus programs. Staff recommends bringing forward an item on a future Council agenda to update this provision of Chapter 4-18. • The staff proposal for redevelopment …

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 2:50 a.m.
Arts CommissionApril 1, 2024

Agenda original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 2 pages

REGULAR MEETING of the ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL Monday, April 1, 2024, at 6:00 PM Virtual Meeting Members of the ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PANEL may participate by video conference. Public comment will be allowed remotely via video conference or telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for participation. To register to speak, call or email lindsay.hutchens@austintexas.gov, (512) 974-3788. CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS/COMMISSIONERS: Chair – Stephanie Lemmo, Vice Chair – J Muzacz, Sarah Carr, Taylor Davis, Kristi-Anne Shaer, Lisa Woods, Monica Maldonado – Arts Commission Liaison CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL AGENDA The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve minutes of the Art in Public Places Panel Regular Meeting on March 4, 2024. Discussion of Arts Commission Liaison Report on Action Items from March 18, 2024, Arts Commissions Meeting by Arts Commission Liaison Maldonado 1. DISCUSSION ITEMS 2. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. 4. 5. ACTION: Approve the Final Design for the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport Terminal Expansion Phase II / West Gate Expansion AIPP Project – Kat Quay ACTION: Approve the Final Design for the Dove Springs Health Center AIPP Project – Mai Gutierrez ACTION: Approve the Selection Process Recommendation for three Austin Fire Department/Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services Station AIPP Projects – Loop 360 / Davenport Ranch Station, Goodnight Ranch Station, and Canyon Creek Station. STAFF BRIEFINGS 6. Art in Public Places Staff Updates on Conservation, Current Projects, and Milestones by Art in Public Places Staff Frederico Geib, Sean Harrison, Lindsay Hutchens, Bryana Iglesias, Alex Irrera, and Ryan Runcie FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please contact Lindsay Hutchens at the Economic Development Department at lindsay.hutchens@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-3788 for additional information; TTY users' route through Relay Texas at 711.

Scraped at: March 30, 2024, 5:40 a.m.
Codes and Ordinances Joint CommitteeApril 1, 2024

Item2_SCWABRecommendations original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 5 pages

South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to remove or exclude height limits from the SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM Ryan Puzycki Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell Motioned By: Description of Recommendation to Council Height limits should be removed or excluded from the South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program. Rationale: Given the difficulty of predicting future market conditions, the decades-long redevelopment timeline for the district, the significant variability of parcel sizes within the district, and the other prescriptions in the South Central Waterfront Combining District & Density Bonus Program, arbitrary height limits would serve to limit flexibility and adaptability to future market conditions, particularly on smaller parcels. As a transit-connected district facing Downtown, a significant portion of which already falls within the Downtown Public Improvement District, the South Central Waterfront will become an integrated extension of Downtown over time. The Core/Waterfront and Rainey Street Districts in the Downtown Austin Plan, which comprise the northern banks opposite the South Central Waterfront, are also not subject to height limits but remain regulated by FAR limits. Vote For: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: [Staff or board member can sign] 1 of 1 South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to amend SOUTH CENTRAL WATERFRONT COMBINING DISTRICT & DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM to direct the Director of the Housing Department to allocate funds from the Housing Trust Fund Fee-in-Lieu to purchase existing housing units within a refined Affordable Housing Fee Spending Area Ryan Puzycki Seconded By: Felicity Maxwell Motioned By: Description of Recommendation to Council Proceeds allocated to the Housing Trust Fund Fee-in-Lieu should be spent to purchase existing housing stock within a refined Affordable Housing Fee Spending Area, as defined by the walkshed of the district and current or planned transit lines transecting or terminating in the district, bound by the borders defined in Section 6.4.E.1.b. Rationale: Given the high cost of building new housing units, affordable or otherwise, in the South Central Waterfront District, the city should allocate funds from the Housing Trust to purchase existing, cheaper housing units within or as close to the district and nearby transit as possible. Vote For: Against: Abstain: Absent: Attest: [Staff or board member can sign] 1 of 1 South Central Waterfront Advisory Board RECOMMENDATION 20240401-XXX Date: Subject: April 1, 2024 Recommendation to amend the boundaries of the Housing …

Scraped at: April 1, 2024, 12:50 p.m.
Music CommissionApril 1, 2024

Supporting Document original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 15 pages

Sound Assessment & Disclosure Requirements Proposal Presentation to City of Austin Music Commission April 3, 2024 Background • Council approved Resolution No. 20181018- 038 directing the City Manager to propose programs, rules, and ordinances necessary to improve compatibility between residents, lodging establishments, and music-related businesses. • The resolution was part of Council efforts to support music, arts and culture. Purpose • Policy related to residential development responsibility is still outstanding. • In addition to the sound ordinance and enforcement, the sound management system should also anticipate and address quality of life issues for residences in proximity to nightlife and entertainment establishments and districts. Policy Goals Ensure Accurate Expectations • Improve compatibility between entertainment uses with amplified sound and residential and hotel uses. • Anticipate, plan for, and minimize common conflicts between residential and hotel uses and entertainment-related amplified sound. • Ensure residential and hotel development projects understand the sound levels in the area so they can design and construct the building considering the sound impact from nearby code-compliant entertainment uses. • Provide residential development projects and new residents with accurate expectations about the level of sound that will be present in the environment, and the information they need to make informed decisions. Approach A commonsense solution that is not prescriptive and focuses on education and awareness Sound Assessment & Disclosure Requires residential and hotel developments near Outdoor Music Venues and Performance Venues to: • conduct a sound assessment • disclose to future residents when they sell or lease units about the presence of nearby venues, and that a sound assessment was conducted Description and Intent • Does NOT mandate building standards. • Requires residential developers to: Promotes Education and Informed Decisions 1. document that they have studied the sound levels in the area they are building. • This includes assessing the impact of legally compliant sound from nearby music and nightlife establishments. 2. disclose to future residents the presence of nearby music and nightlife establishments, and that a sound assessment has been conducted. Description and Intent • Residents are encouraged to ask questions about sound mitigation efforts, make informed decisions Promotes Education and Informed Decisions • Does NOT require anything further from Outdoor Music Venue Permit Holders or Performance Venues. • Their sound level is already regulated with a fixed sound level standard that is appropriate for the context, is predictable and doesn’t change when new residential is built nearby. …

Scraped at: April 1, 2024, 11:30 p.m.
Music CommissionApril 1, 2024

Supporting Documents original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 3 pages

MUSIC COMMISSION MEETING 4/01/2024 H O T E L O C C U P A N C Y T A X C O L L E C T I O N S L I V E M U S I C F U N D Kim McCarson Program Manager UPDATED 4.01.2024 FY 24 Year-to-Date Hotel Occupancy Tax Collections – Live Music Fund FY24 Amended Budget $5,575,000 February 2024 w/ Encumbrances $288,304 FY24 Year-to-Date w/ Encumbrances $2,077,678 FY24 Year-End Estimate $17,874 $312,748 $827,586 $19,399 $338,773 $854,923 $12,938 $323,076 $798,287 $5,509 $217,400 $744,461 $288,304 $857,431 $4,903 $171,733 $755,308 FY 23 October February FY 24 November March December April January May FY 23 Year-to-Date Hotel Occupancy Tax Collections – Live Music Fund FY23 Amended Budget $4,100,000 September 2023 w/ Encumbrances $17,874 FY23 Year-to-Date w/ Encumbrances $4,472,973 FY23 Year-End Estimate $4,043,166 $17,874 $312,748 $827,586 $19,399 $338,773 $854,923 $12,938 $323,076 $798,287 $5,509 $217,400 $744,461 FY 23 October April November May December June January July February August March September

Scraped at: April 1, 2024, 11:30 p.m.
Public Safety CommissionApril 1, 2024

Item #3 DACC Memo original pdf

Thumbnail of the first page of the PDF
Page 1 of 33 pages

M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Council Members THROUGH: Bruce Mills, Interim Assistant City Manager FROM: Robert Kingham, Court Administrator, Downtown Austin Community Court DATE: March 27, 2024 SUBJECT: Staff Response to Resolution No. 20230816-016 regarding Downtown Austin Community Court Mobile Court Pilot This memorandum provides a staff response regarding the Downtown Austin Community Court (DACC) Mobile Court Pilot, initiated in response to Resolution 20230816-016. Included as an attachment is a third-party analysis of the Pilot conducted by Sultan Justice Consulting Corp. The Report includes research on mobile court and community court models and a detailed account of the Pilot’s development, implementation, and outcomes. Additionally, the Report includes the following recommendations: 1. Implement a sustainable, fully-staffed, DACC Mobile Court Program. 2. Continue and expand upon stakeholder engagement to scale Mobile Court implementation. 3. Study the impact on existing requests for current DACC services with the addition of Mobile Court to inform further DACC staffing needs and growth. 4. Invest in Mobile Court transportation resources and technology. Mobile Court Pilot Development DACC consulted with the DACC Advisory Board regarding data collection and potential Pilot locations. DACC also engaged with the Austin Homelessness Advisory Council (AHAC) on data, locations, and how to build trust and encourage people to engage in services. Austin Municipal Court (AMC), the Homeless Strategy Office, and staff across DACC’s Court Services, Homeless Services, and Support Services units offered insights to inform program development. In line with direction in the resolution, DACC engaged other stakeholders with a goal of identifying locations for Pilot sites that were geographically dispersed and trusted locations where members of the community were already engaging in services. The Pilot was developed to bring the same level of services provided onsite at DACC directly to individuals in community-based locations. Throughout the Pilot, DACC provided individuals the opportunity to check for open cases and warrants with AMC and DACC, virtual access to a judge and prosecutor to resolve cases and clear warrants, as well as onsite access to a case manager to help with resource navigation and connection to services. When appropriate, individuals engaging in the Pilot were able to enroll in ongoing case management through DACC’s Clinical Diversion Program (CDP). Mobile Court Pilot Implementation Between October 18, 2023 and February 5, 2024, there were 18 dates where DACC provided Pilot services. The service location partners for the Pilot included …

Scraped at: April 2, 2024, 12:40 a.m.