N E W Y O R K A V E N U E T E E R T S A N O E L FRONT YARD - STREET SIDE SIDE YARD - STREET SIDE CONTEXT PLAN NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BUILDING REAR YARD SIDE YARD RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 1 of 5 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS 1617 NEW YORK AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78702 2-STORY ADDITION 2-STORY ADDITION NEW CHIMNEY NEW SUN ROOM EXISTING BUILDING NORTHEAST VIEW - STREET SIDE NORTHWEST VIEW - SIDE YARD NEW CHIMNEY RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 2 of 5 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS 1617 NEW YORK AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78702 STANDARD 1.4 FOR CORNER PROPERTIES, SET BACK THE ADDITION TO ALIGN WITH OR BEHIND THE FRONT SETBACK OF THE ADJACENT BUILDING FRONTING ON THAT STREET. FRONT OF ADJACENT BUILDING NEW SUN ROOM NEW SUN ROOM EXISTING CONDITIONS PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET SIDE AT FRONT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 3 of 5 HISTORIC DESIGN STANDARDS 1617 NEW YORK AVE. AUSTIN, TX 78702 STANDARD 2.2 MINIMIZE THE APPEARANCE OF THE ADDITION FROM THE STREET FACED BY THE HISTORIC BUILDING’S FRONT WALL. A. IF THE ADDITION CONNECTS TO THE HISTORIC BUILDING’S REAR WALL, STEP IN THE ADDITION’S SIDE WALLS AT LEAST ONE FOOT FROM THE SIDE WALLS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. NEW CHIMNEY EXISTING BUILDING 2-STORY ADDITION BEYOND ” 8 - ’ 5 1 1’-3” NEW SUN ROOM NEW SUN ROOM 2’-6” 2-STORY ADDITION ROOF PLAN PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET SIDE AT FRONT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2021 PR-2021-176664, GF-2021-205518 4608 AVENUE H D.3 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1949 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION One-story Minimal Traditional cross-gabled bungalow with wood siding, double-hung wood windows, and a partial-with porch with iron lattice posts. The house at 4608 Avenue H was built in 1949 by Felix Williams, a homebuilder who worked in the North Hyde Park and other areas of Austin. The house was occupied by short-term renters with various occupations throughout the 1950s. The Historic Building Survey Report for North Central Austin: West Campus, North University, Heritage, Bryker Woods, and North Hyde Park (HHM, Inc., 2021) lists the property as contributing to a potential North Hyde Park Historic District, recommended as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and as a local historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The house is a typical example of a Minimal Traditional house. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP D.3 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos D.3 – 3 Application, 2021 Occupancy History City Directory Research, September 2021; January 2017 Beatrice Rogers, owner Clerk, Texas Employment Commission Milo N. and Ileta Moen, renters U.S. Air Force William C. and Barbara A. Sojourner, renters Student William J. and Ruth Boyles, renters Accountant, State Highway Department 1949 Address not listed Biographical Information No significant biographical information found. 1959 1957 1955 1952 Permits D.3 – 4 Building Permit, 1949 Water Service Permit, 1949 D.3 …
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Timothy Ruttan Thursday, January 20, 2022 7:36 AM PAZ Preservation Objection 4608 Avenue H *** External Email ‐ Exercise Caution *** Any demolition should be replaced with higher density, multi family affordable housing that fits the neighborhood. We should not sacrifice exhausting historical houses for larger single family housing that does not improve density or affordability. Thank you. CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 2 Sent from my iPhone 3
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2022 PR-2021-193617; GF-2021-205522 1208 S. 5TH STREET D.4 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1946 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION One-story gable-roofed house with gabled entryway, symmetrical wood windows, and horizontal wood siding. 1208 S. 5th Street was constructed in 1946. Its first occupants were Lewis and Ollie Hendrix in 1948; Lewis Hendrix died in 1950 and the home was purchased by draftsman Ronald Lucas and his wife, Mary. By 1957, welder Eldie Doerr had purchased the property. He and his family remained in the home until at least 1960. The 2015 Bouldin historic resource survey lists the property as a medium priority and contributing to a potential historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. According to the 2015 Bouldin survey, the building is constructed in the Craftsman style. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse or relocation but approve the application upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP D.4 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos D.4 – 3 Source: Compass.com, 2021 Occupancy History City Directory Research, December 2021 1959 1957 1955 1952 1949 1947 1944 Eddie M. Doerr, owner Eddie M. and Anna Doerr, owners Welder Vacant Ronald M. and Mary L. Lucas, owners Draftsman, City Electric Inspection Lewis and Ollie Hendricks, owners Laborer Vacant Address not listed Biographical information D.4 – 4 The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Sep 14, 1950 The Austin Statesman (1921-1973); Feb 9, 1960 Permits D.4 – 5 Sewer Service Permit, 1946 Water Service Permit, 1946 Building Permit, 1946
1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021 1208 S 5TH STREET1.17.2021
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2022 PR-2021-191341/GF-2021-205527 3621 WINDSOR ROAD D.5 – 1 Demolish a ca. 1949 house and garage apartment. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story, cross-gabled brick residence with basement, central copper-roofed bay window, partial-width covered porch, and mulled and single multi-light wood windows. A two-story garage apartment clad in brick and board-and-batten siding is behind the primary building. The house at 3621 Windsor Road was designed by C. H. Page and Son and constructed in 1949 for Alma Langham Thomas, along with a rear accessory dwelling unit, originally servants’ quarters. Thomas, a former rancher, school principal, and oilwoman, was a prominent philanthropist and civic contributor during her tenure in the home. Born a rancher’s daughter and married to rancher E. R. Thomas, who died in the 1920s, Thomas spent her early life in Oklahoma and West Texas. Upon moving to Austin to attend the University of Texas at age 38—along with her two sons—she completed a Master’s degree and returned to Midland to work as a school principal. Thomas moved back to Austin in 1948 after oil was discovered on her family’s ranchland. She traveled extensively for the rest of her life, donating art objects from her travels to university collections throughout the state. Thomas was the first woman appointed to Southwestern University’s executive board of trustees. She was honored for her philanthropic contributions to arts education with a theater building bearing her name in 1956. In Austin, she was a leading patron of the fine arts, serving on the boards of the Austin Arts Council, Austin Woman’s Club, Texas Fine Arts Association, and Austin Symphony. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building, designed by C. H. Page and Son, displays early Ranch- and Revival-style influences. b. Historical association. The property appears to have significant historical associations with philanthropist Alma c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human Thomas. history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2022 PR-2021-196484; GF-2021-205536 904 CHRISTOPHER STREET D.6 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolish a ca. 1937 house and detached garage. One-story house with horizontal wood siding and 1:1 screened wood windows. The cross-gabled roof with asymmetrical sloped roofline at the gable is clad in composition shingles. The main elevation features a partial width inset porch supported by simple boxed columns. RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION The house and garage at 904 Christopher Street were constructed in 1937 by R. W. Herndon, presumably as a rental property. Its longest-term occupants were John W. and Dora M. Kelly. John Kelly, a farmer and rancher, spent the 1950s doing carpentry work. His wife, Dora, was active in the Order of the Eastern Star, a women’s charitable organization. Other occupants included two service station owners. The 2015 Bouldin survey lists the property as a medium priority and contributing to a potential local historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building displays Minimal Traditional and Tudor Revival influences. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP D.6 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos D.6 – 3 Demolition Permit Application, 2021 D.6 – 4 Occupancy History City Directory Research, December 2021 1959 1957 1955 1952 1949 1947 1944 1941 1939 Vacant Curtis and Nelda Williams, renters Operator, Magnolia Service Station John W. and Dora M. Kelly, renters Carpenter John W. and Dora M. Kelly, renters Carpenter John W. and Dora M. Kelly, renters Farmer John W. …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2022 PR-2021-200118, GF-2021-205545 1709 EVA STREET D.7 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1912 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Single-story side-gabled house, clad in asbestos siding with six-light and single-light wood windows with aluminum screens. The house has a central partial-width, flat-roofed porch with decorative iron supports and railing. The house at 1709 Eva Street was built around 1912. Leonard L. Bridwell, a driver for J. C. McKinstry, was the first recorded occupant of the house. The house was later occupied by various renters, most of whom worked as laborers. Joseph Wright is listed as the home’s occupant in 1927 and later with his wife, Melissa, in 1929. Joseph worked as a janitor for the Confederate Home. The next long-time renters of the house were Houston and Clara Desmond, who lived in the house from around 1935–1941. Houston worked as a laborer for the City Street & Bridge Division. The house was then rented by Joseph and Louise Edwards in 1944. Joseph was a carpenter for Calcasieu Lumber. Earnest and Willie Young rented the house in 1947. Earnest worked as a driver. Arnold and Annie Cain owned the house from around 1949–1952. Arnold worked as a firefighter for S. P. Lines. Oscar and Wilma Proffitt owned the house beginning in 1955. Oscar worked as a clerk for W.G. Rissmann Grocery. PROPERTY EVALUATION The Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Historic Resources Survey and Assessment, Austin, Texas (Preservation Central, Inc., 2016) lists the property as contributing to a potential Brackenridge School Historic District, recommended as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and as a local historic district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The house is an example of an early 20th-century house with historic-period changes including installation of asbestos siding and replacement of an earlier full-width porch. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2022 GF-2022-000303 608 E. 41ST STREET D.8 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Replace all windows, open enclosed front porch and replace screens, remove chimney, replace roof with standing-seam metal, add dormer to main façade, remove decorative brackets, and construct a two-story addition immediately above the ridgeline of a ca. 1930 one-story house. 1) Window replacement: replace most existing windows, except porch windows. Window at main façade will be removed and replaced with new window of similar configuration. Windows at secondary elevations appear to be vinyl. 2) Open enclosed front porch, removing existing screens and knee wall, and replace screens with undivided retractable screen. 3) Remove existing brick chimney. 4) Replace roof with standing-seam metal roof to match proposed addition. 5) Add dormer to main façade. The proposed dormer is gabled, with a single arched window. 6) Remove decorative brackets at entryway and gable ends. 7) Demolish existing addition and carport and construct a two-story addition to the rear of the house, immediately above the existing roof ridge. The proposed addition is clad in painted brick and horizontal fiber- cement siding. Its irregular compound roof is clad in standing-seam metal and features shed, side-gable, and gabled profiles. Windows are a combination of fixed and 1:1 casement, with full-height 2:2 fixed windows with decorative half-timbered trim at the east elevation and an ornamental fountain beneath. Decorative exposed purlins are proposed for eave overhangs at east and rear elevations. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story cross-gabled house with partial-width inset screened porch, steep gable with deep eaves and triangular knee braces, arched front entryway with decorative brackets and exposed rafter tails at gabled portico, original lattice window at main façade, and horizontal wood siding. The main house at 608 E. 41st Street was constructed around 1930 by W. D. Nealand. Frances and W. Bryan Stoermer were its first and longest-term owners. W. B. Stoermer owned and operated a welding and machinist shop with his brother Clarence. The shop was located on E. 5th Street, though the address changed from the 100 block to the 300 block. The Stoermers constructed a rear dwelling unit in 1936, and it became a steady rental property even after their departure in the early 1940s. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate …
CONCEPT RENDERING PROJECT TEAM ZONING & CODE ANALYSIS OWNER JOHN DAVIS 608 E 41ST STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78751 STRUCTURAL A-1 ENGINEERING ENGINEER 1006 VANCE JACKSON ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78201 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0.1172 AC OF LOT 6 BLK 6 OLT 14 DIV C IDEAL PLACE MAYRA RAMIREZ 210-625-4825 mayra@a-1engineering.com PARCEL ID ZONING BUILDING CODES 0219080107 SF-3-CO-NP ARCHITECT studioHA JOHN DAVIS 410-507-9931 jrandolphd@gmail.com 2114 E 16TH STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78702 HOLLY ARTHUR, AIA 512-694-3557 holly@studioha.com 2021 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE (COA AMMENDMENTS) 2021 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE (COA AMMENDMENTS) 2021 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE (COA AMMENDMENTS) 2020 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (COA AMMENDMENTS) 2021 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE (COA) BUILDING DESCRIPTION WOOD FRAMED TWO STORY RESIDENCE LEGAL JURISDICTION AUSTIN, TEXAS, TRAVIS COUNTY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION R-1 FIRE SPRINKLER NOT REQUIRED ISSUED DATE 2021-12-23 PROJECT # 2102 PERMIT SET AREA CALCULATIONS SYMBOL LEGEND 1 / A3.0 ELEVATION ROOM NAME 1.01 200 SF ROOM NAME NUMBER AREA BUILDING SECTION DOOR NUMBER 1 A3.0 A3.0 1 1 A3.0 1 A3.0 1.01 1.01 A1 A TA-1 WALL SECTION WINDOW TYPE SECTION DETAIL PARTITION TYPE DETAIL PLUMBING FIXTURE TYPE TOILET ACCESSORY TYPE VICINITY MAP 608 E 41st STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78751 TRUE NORTH (SMALL LOT AMNESTY ALLOWS FOR 2,300 SQFT) DRAWING INDEX ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL G1.0 G1.1 A0.1 A0.2 A1.0 A1.1 A1.2 A1.3 A1.4 A1.5 A1.6 A2.0 A2.1 A3.0 A3.1 A5.0 A5.1 A5.2 A5.3 A5.4 E1.1 E1.2 COVER SHEET SPECIFICATIONS DEMO SITE PLAN DEMO PLANS SITE PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR DIMENSION PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR DIMENSION PLAN ROOF PLAN ATTIC EXEMPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS BUILDING SECTIONS STAIRS STAIRS EXTERIOR DETAILS EXTERIOR DETAILS EXTERIOR DETAILS L1 CEILING AND UTILITY PLAN L2 CEILING AND UTILITY PLAN S0.0 S1.1 S1.2 S2.1 S2.2 S2.3 S2.4 S2.5 S3.1 S4.1 S4.2 COVER SHEET GENERAL NOTES SCHEDULES FOUNDATION AND SAW CUT LAYOUT FRAMING PLAN FRAMING PLAN FRAMING PLAN FRAMING PLAN FOUNDATION DETAILS FRAMING SECTION AND DETAILS FRAMING DETAILS PROJECT DAVIS HOUSE 608 E 41st STREET AUSTIN, TEXAS 78751 G1.0 COVER SHEET FOR REFERENCE ONLY GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, AND TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 2. EXAMINATION OF THE SITE AND PORTIONS THEREOF THAT AFFECT THIS WORK SHALL BE MADE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, WHO SHALL COMPARE EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SATISFY HIM/HERSELF AS TO THE EXISTING CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED. CONTRACTOR SHALL …
E U N E V K A C E P E 41st ST REET E U N E V K A C E P FRONT YARD - STREET SIDE SIDE YARD - STREET SIDE CONTEXT NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BUILDING REAR YARD SIDE YARD RESIDENTIAL ADDITION H I S T O R I C D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S 6 0 8 E 4 1 S T S T R E E T A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 5 1 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 1 of 1 1 LOCATION ADDITION IS LOCATED SO THAT IT DOES NOT VISUALLY OVERPOWER THE EXISTING BUILDING, COMPROMISE ITS HISTORIC CHARACTER, OR DESTROY SIGNIFICANT FEATURES OR MATERIALS 2-STORY ADDITION NEW BALCONY EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-STORY ADDITION NEW DORMER EXISTING BUILDING NEW DORMER REMOVING SCREENED PORCH ROOF PLAN PERSPECTIVE FROM STREET SIDE AT FRONT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION H I S T O R I C D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S 6 0 8 E 4 1 S T S T R E E T A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 5 1 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 2 | 2 of 4 2 SCALE, MASSING, AND HEIGHT ADDITION TO COMPLEMENT THE SCALE AND MASSING OF THE HISTORIC BUILDING. MINIMIZE THE APPEARANCE OF THE ADDITION FROM THE STREET FACED BY THE HISTORIC BUILDING’S FRONT WALL. SOUTHWEST VIEW - EXISTING CONDITIONS SOUTHEAST VIEW - EXISTING CONDITIONS NEW GABLE ROOF MATCHES EXISTING ROOF SLOPES NEW BALCONY 2-STORY ADDITION 2-STORY ADDITION NEW DORMER EXISTING BUILDING SOUTHWEST VIEW - SIDE YARD (PROPOSED DESIGN) SOUTHEAST VIEW - STREET SIDE (PROPOSED DESIGN) RESIDENTIAL ADDITION H I S T O R I C D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S 6 0 8 E 4 1 S T S T …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS JANUARY 24, 2022 PR-2021-202292, GF-2021-001028 607 E 38TH STREET D.9 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1935 duplex. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH PROPERTY EVALUATION One-story side-gabled duplex with raised concrete stoops at either end of the façade. It exhibits modest Craftsman stylistic influences, including exposed rafter tails and knee braces supporting small gabled roofs over the porch stoops. The building has wood siding, paired 1:1 windows, and Craftsman-style wood doors with three vertical lights. The duplex at 607 E 38th Street was built in the mid-1930s. The first recorded owner of the duplex was Lucille Marlow, a bookkeeper at Austin Metal & Iron Co. The other occupants of the duplex were various renters made up of military personnel, students, and administrators. The draft North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek survey lists the property as a medium preservation priority. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that may meet two criteria: a. Architecture. This building is a good example of a Craftsman-style duplex, a relatively rare building form. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, but release the permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. LOCATION MAP D.9 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos D.9 – 3 Demolition permit application, 2022 D.9 – 4 Google Street View, 2021 Occupancy History City Directory Research, September 2021; January 2017 1959 Douglas E. Jourdan, renter David W. Campbell, renter 1957 Donald and Edell Wentz, renters USAF Billy B. and Wanda R. Wylie, renters Pharmacist, White Pharmacy 1955 Robert E. and Dorothy Richardson, renters Student Billy B. and Wanda R. Wylie, renters Billy – pharmacist Wanda – office secretary, State Health Department …
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING January 24, 2022 @ 3:30PM City Council Chambers at City Hall 301 W 2nd Street, Austin Texas Some members of the PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live AGENDA Amanda Lewis Rocky Lane Michael Sierra-Arevalo Rebecca Bernhardt Cory Hall-Martin CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Rebecca Gonzales, Chair Nelly Paulina Ramirez, Vice Chair Rebecca Webber Kathleen Hausenfluck Queen Enyioha John T. Kiracofe CALL TO ORDER 4:00-4:05pm Citizen Communications 4:05-4:20pm (from speakers signed up to speak) CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. There will also be a sign up sheet at the meeting location for those wishing to sign up to speak in-person 15miniutes prior to the start of the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely by telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation. To register please call (512) 924-9947 before noon on 1-23-2022 or email Janet.jackson@austintexas.gov Items for Presentation, Discussion and Possible Action: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Dec. 6, 2021 4:20pm-4:25pm 2. OLD BUSINESS a. Legislative update on SB69 (sponsors: Commissioner Ramirez and Gonzales) 4:25pm- 4:35pm Speaker(s): -Anni-Michelle Evans, Policy Compliance Consultant, Office of Police Oversight b. Recommendation for Council Action regarding The Marshal Report – 4:35-4:40pm Sponsored by Commissioner Bernhardt and Webber 3. NEW BUSINESS a. Public Safety Organizations Quarterly Report – Austin Fire Department (sponsors: Commissioner Hausenfluck and Gonzales) 4:40pm-4:50pm Speaker(s): -Chief Rob Vires, Austin Fire Department b. Winter Readiness (sponsors: Commissioner Lane & Ramirez) 4:50pm-5:10pm Speaker(s): - Teresa Gardner, Assistant Chief, ATCEMS (Austin/Travis County Emergency Medical Service) - Rob Vires, Chief of Staff, Austin Fire Department -Brandon Wade, Assistant Chief, Austin Fire Department - Catherine Johnson, Assistant Chief, Austin Police Department - Everett Beldin, Officer, Austin Police Department c. Status of Labor Negotiations with APD and EMS (sponsors: Commissioner Webber and Bernhardt) 5:10pm -5:55pm Speaker(s): -Lee Crawford, Law Department, City of Austin -Ken Casady, Austin Police Association -Selena Xie, Austin EMS Association -Chris Harris, Austin Justice Coalition 4. Future Agenda Items 5:55-6:00pm Adjourn @ 6pm The City …
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Special Called Meeting January 24, 2022 3:00 p.m. Austin Energy Headquarters; 1st Floor; Shudde Fath Conference Room 4815 Mueller Blvd, Austin, Texas 78723 Some members of the Resource Management Commission maybe participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live AGENDA Members: Jonathan Blackburn, Chair (District 8) Kaiba White, Vice Chair (District 2) Charlotte Davis (District 1) Sam Angoori (District 3) Shane Johnson (District 4) Tom “Smitty” Smith (District 5) Louis Stone (District 6) Kelly Davis (District 7) Dana Harmon (District 9) Rebecca Brenneman (District 10) Lisa Chavarria (Mayor) For more information, please visit: www.austintexas.gov/rmc CALL MEETING TO ORDER CITIZEN COMMUNICATION: GENERAL Speakers who register to speak no later than the day before the meeting will be allowed a three- minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve minutes of the November 16, 2021 Meeting of the Resource Management Commission. NEW BUSINESS – CONSENT ( ) = Target Council Meeting Date; [ ] = RCA Type 2. (2/17) [ Austin Energy] Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $268,960 to the Mothers’ Milk Bank @ Austin, hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 5925 Dillard Circle, Unit A, Austin TX 78752, in District 4. 3. (2/17) [ Austin Energy] Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $141,750 to the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation (MSDF), hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 4417 Westlake Drive, Building B, Austin, TX 78746, in District 10. 4. (2/17) [ Austin Energy] Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $80,190 to Saint Edwards University, hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give at least two days (48 hours) before the meeting date. TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. To register for Citizen Communication or for additional information regarding the Resource Management Commission, please email Natasha.Goodwin@austinenergy.com . Natasha Goodwin, Austin Energy, (512)322-6505 or call at installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 3001 S Congress Ave OPS, …
Natural Gas Energy Efficiency Pilot Proposal Austin, TX Resource Management Commission January 24, 2022 Overview Purpose of Pilot CenterPoint Energy proposes to introduce targeted program offerings that will deliver cost- effective energy savings, promote awareness of energy conservation, and provide customers in Austin Texas with opportunities to reduce natural gas usage in their homes and businesses. • Specific Objectives affordability of energy; • Reduce end-use natural gas consumption to conserve resources and improve • Provide environmental benefits by influencing the use of energy efficient equipment and technology that reduces carbon dioxide emissions and other greenhouse gases; and • Promote energy-conscious attitudes and behaviors that support energy conservation and sustainability 2 Overview Pilot Development The Pilot is designed with a “Quick-Start” approach and offers programs that can be implemented with minimal budget and complexity while still providing cost-effective energy-savings opportunities to customers. • Factors Evaluated in Pilot Design Identify programs best suited for a small-scale pilot Develop measure level energy savings Develop cost projections Evaluate cost-effectiveness Determine the most effective marketing and delivery channels • Proposed Program Offerings Prescriptive Equipment Rebates DIY Home Conservation Improvement Products Commercial Direct Install Equipment • • • • • • • • 3 Overview Pilot Plan Summary • Projections Budget: $20,114 Annual Energy Savings: 9,488 Ccf Net Economic Benefits: $29,148 • Implementation Period • Eleven-month pilot (February 2022 – December 2022) • Funding • • • • The Company seeks to recover program costs concurrently with implementation of the pilot through a ratepayer funded mechanism. 4 High Efficiency Equipment Rebates Description The High-Efficiency Equipment Rebates program is designed to promote energy-efficient retrofits by offering incentives to customers for the purchase and installation of new high- efficiency natural gas equipment. • Eligible Equipment Equipment Efficiency Customer Rebate Natural Gas Force Air Furnace 95% AFUE or Higher Natural Gas Tankless Water Heater .87 UEF or Higher Natural Gas Storage Tank Water Heater .70 UEF or Higher Smart Thermostat ENERGY STAR Qualified $600 $350 $100 $50 • Program Projections Budget: $10,500 • • • • Annual Energy Savings: 2,213 Ccf Net Economic Benefits: $9,701 Participating Customers: 35 5 Home Conservation Improvement Products Description CenterPoint Energy’s Home Conservation Improvement Products program will provide free water and energy saving equipment to residential customers. • Eligible Equipment Low-Flow Showerheads Low-Flow Kitchen Faucet Aerators Low-Flow Bathroom Faucet Aerators • Program Projections Budget: $2,989 Annual Energy Savings: 890 Ccf Net Economic Benefits: $3,164 …
..De Posting Language ..Title Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $268,960 to the Mothers’ Milk Bank @ Austin, hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 5925 Dillard Circle, Unit A, Austin TX 78752, in District 4. Lead Department Austin Energy Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Operating Budget of Austin Energy. Prior Council Action: For More Information: Jeff Vice, Director, Local Government Issues (512) 322-6087; Richard Génecé, Vice President, Customer Energy Solutions (512) 322-6327; Tim Harvey, Solar Program Manager (512) 482-5386. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: January 10, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Electric Utility Commission. January 18, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Resource Management Commission. Additional Backup Information: Austin Energy requests approval to issue this CBI at a rate of $1.00/Watt-DC to the Customer for the installation of solar electric system(s)*, detailed in the table below at their facility to produce renewable energy for on-site consumption. The table below provides a summary of the system sizes, costs, and proposed incentives: Mothers’ Milk Bank @ Austin Number of Modules Module Rating (W-DC) Total System Size (kW-DC) Total System Size (kW-AC) Annual Estimated Production (kWh) Total System Cost ($) Total Incentive ($) Percent of Cost Covered 656 410 269 223 366,962 $361,010 $268,960 74.5% *All solar equipment meets Austin Energy program requirements Mothers’ Milk Bank @ Austin is a non-profit organization whose mission is to save babies’ lives by providing prescribed donor human milk. The proposed solar system would cover 101% of the historic annual energy needs of this building. This solar project will generate an estimated 366,962 kWh per year and, according to US Energy Information Administration, based on the state-wide electricity profile, is estimated to prevent the production of the following emissions each year: 172 US tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2); 345,311 pounds of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2); and 257 pounds of Nitrogen Oxide (NOX). According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalency Calculator, these emissions reductions are equivalent to planting 2,580 trees or 191 acres of forest in Austin's parks or the removal of 392,149 vehicle miles or 33.9 cars from Austin roadways. According to the updated Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan, approved by Austin City Council in March 2020, “Austin Energy will achieve a total of 375 MW of local solar …
..De Posting Language ..Title Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $141,750 to the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation (MSDF), hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 4417 Westlake Drive, Building B, Austin, TX 78746, in District 10. Lead Department Austin Energy Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Operating Budget of Austin Energy. Prior Council Action: For More Information: Jeff Vice, Director, Local Government Issues (512) 322-6087; Richard Génecé, Vice President, Customer Energy Solutions (512) 322-6327; Tim Harvey, Solar Program Manager (512) 482-5386. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: January 10, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Electric Utility Commission. January 18, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Resource Management Commission. Additional Backup Information: Austin Energy requests approval to issue this CBI at a rate of $1.00/Watt-DC to the Customer for the installation of solar electric system(s)*, detailed in the table below at their facility to produce renewable energy for on-site consumption. The table below provides a summary of the system sizes, costs, and proposed incentives: MSDF Number of Modules Module Rating (W-DC) Total System Size (kW-DC) Total System Size (kW-AC) Annual Estimated Production (kWh) Total System Cost ($) Total Incentive ($) Percent of Cost Covered *All solar equipment meets Austin Energy program requirements 315 450 141.75 117.65 195,472 $267,908 $141,750 53% The Michael and Susan Dell Foundation works to transform the lives of children living in urban poverty through improved education, health, and family economic stability. The proposed solar system would cover 23% of the anticipated annual energy needs of this new building. According to the US Energy Information Administration, based on the state-wide electricity profile, this solar project is estimated to prevent the production of the following emissions each year: 92 US tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2); 117 pounds of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2); and 136 pounds of Nitrogen Oxide (NOX). According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalency Calculator, these emissions reductions are equivalent to planting 1,380 trees or 102 acres of forest in Austin's parks or the removal of 209,754 vehicle miles or 18.2 cars from Austin roadways. According to the updated Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan, approved by Austin City Council in March 2020, “Austin Energy will achieve a total of 375 MW of local solar capacity by the end of 2030, of …
..D e Posting Language ..T itle Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $80,190 to Saint Edwards University, hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 3001 S Congress Ave OPS, Austin TX 78704, in District 3. Lead Department Austin Energy Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Operating Budget of Austin Energy. Prior Council Action: For More Information: Jeff Vice, Director, Local Government Issues (512) 322-6087; Richard Génecé, Vice President, Customer Energy Solutions (512) 322-6327; Tim Harvey, Solar Program Manager (512) 482-5386. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: January 10, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Electric Utility Commission. January 18, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Resource Management Commission. Additional Backup Information: Austin Energy requests approval to issue this CBI at a rate of $1.00/Watt-DC to the Customer for the installation of solar electric system(s)*, detailed in the table below at their facility to produce renewable energy for on-site consumption. The table below provides a summary of the system sizes, costs, and proposed incentives: Saint Edwards University Number of Modules Module Rating (W-DC) Total System Size (kW-DC) Total System Size (kW-AC) Annual Estimated Production (kWh) Total System Cost ($) Total Incentive ($) Percent of Cost Covered 198 405 80 67 113,494 $119,197 $80,190 67% *All solar equipment meets Austin Energy program requirements Saint Edwards University is a private university for graduate and undergraduate programs. The proposed solar system would cover 40% of the historic annual energy needs of this building. This solar project will generate an estimated 113,494 kWh per year and, according to US Energy Information Administration, based on the state-wide electricity profile, is estimated to prevent the production of the following emissions each year: 53 tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2); 68 pounds of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2); and 79 pounds of Nitrogen Oxide (NOX). According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalency Calculator, these emissions reductions are equivalent to planting 795 trees or 58.9 acres of forest in Austin's parks or the removal of 120,837 vehicle miles or 10.5 cars from Austin roadways. According to the updated Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan, approved by Austin City Council in March 2020, “Austin Energy will achieve a total of 375 MW of local solar capacity by the end of 2030, of which 200 MW will be customer-sited (when …
..De Posting Language ..Title Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $252,780 to Westminster Manor, Inc, hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 4232 Bull Creek Road, Austin, TX 78731, in District 10. Lead Department Austin Energy Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Operating Budget of Austin Energy. Prior Council Action: For More Information: Jeff Vice, Director, Local Government Issues (512) 322-6087; Richard Génecé, Vice President, Customer Energy Solutions (512) 322-6327; Tim Harvey, Solar Program Manager (512) 482-5386. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: January 10, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Electric Utility Commission. January 18, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Resource Management Commission. Additional Backup Information: Austin Energy requests approval to issue this CBI at a rate of $1.00/Watt-DC to the Customer for the installation of solar electric system(s)*, detailed in the table below at their facility to produce renewable energy for on-site consumption. The table below provides a summary of the system sizes, costs, and proposed incentives: Westminster Manor – 4232 Bull Creek Road Number of Modules Module Rating (W-DC) Total System Size (kW-DC) Total System Size (kW-AC) Annual Estimated Production (kWh) Total System Cost ($) Total Incentive ($) Percent of Cost Covered 766 330 253 210 364,155 $492,921 $252,780 51% *All solar equipment meets Austin Energy program requirements Westminster Manor, Inc, is an assisted living facility for seniors. The proposed solar system would cover 12% of the historic annual energy needs of this building. This solar project will generate an estimated 364,155 kWh per year and, according to US Energy Information Administration, based on the state-wide electricity profile, is estimated to prevent the production of the following emissions each year: 171 tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2); 218 pounds of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2); and 255 pounds of Nitrogen Oxide (NOX). According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalency Calculator, these emissions reductions are equivalent to planting 2,565 trees or 190 acres of forest in Austin's parks or the removal of 389,869 vehicle miles or 33.7 cars from Austin roadways. According to the updated Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan, approved by Austin City Council in March 2020, “Austin Energy will achieve a total of 375 MW of local solar capacity by the end of 2030, of which 200 MW will be customer-sited (when including …
..De Posting Language ..Title Approve issuance of a capacity-based incentive (CBI) of $273,240 to the YMCA of Austin, hereinafter referred to as “the Customer” for the installation of solar electric systems on their facility, located at 5807 McNeil Drive, Austin, TX 78727, in District 6. Lead Department Austin Energy Fiscal Note Funding is available in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Operating Budget of Austin Energy. Prior Council Action: For More Information: Jeff Vice, Director, Local Government Issues (512) 322-6087; Richard Génecé, Vice President, Customer Energy Solutions (512) 322-6327; Tim Harvey, Solar Program Manager (512) 482-5386. Council Committee, Boards and Commission Action: January 10, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Electric Utility Commission. January 18, 2022 – To be reviewed by the Resource Management Commission. Additional Backup Information: Austin Energy requests approval to issue this CBI at a rate of $1.00/Watt-DC to the Customer for the installation of solar electric system(s)*, detailed in the table below at their facility to produce renewable energy for on-site consumption. The table below provides a summary of the system sizes, costs, and proposed incentives: YMCA of Austin - 5807 McNeil Drive, Austin, TX 78727 Number of Modules Module Rating (W-DC) Total System Size (kW-DC) Total System Size (kW-AC) Annual Estimated Production (kWh) Total System Cost ($) Total Incentive ($) Percent of Cost Covered 828 330 273 227 391,903 $508,226 $273,240 54% *All solar equipment meets Austin Energy program requirements The YMCA of Austin provides recreational facilities and classes. The proposed solar system would cover 27% of the historic annual energy needs of this building. This solar project will generate an estimated 391,903 kWh per year and, according to US Energy Information Administration, based on the state-wide electricity profile, is estimated to prevent the production of the following emissions each year: 184 tons of Carbon Dioxide (CO2); 235 pounds of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2); and 274 pounds of Nitrogen Oxide (NOX). According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalency Calculator, these emissions reductions are equivalent to planting 2,760 trees or 205 acres of forest in Austin's parks or the removal of 419,508 vehicle miles or 36.3 cars from Austin roadways. According to the updated Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan, approved by Austin City Council in March 2020, “Austin Energy will achieve a total of 375 MW of local solar capacity by the end of 2030, of which 200 MW will be customer-sited …
