7.a - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
Historic Landmark Commission Homepage
Upcoming meetings
8.0 1209 Rosewood Ave - Haynes-Delashwah — original pdf
8 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 C14H- 1980-0011; HR-2023-148863; GF-2023-149149 HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE 1209 ROSEWOOD AVENUE PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Install landscape elements, fencing, and pavement to a landmarked site also individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 1) Remodel ADA pathways and install hardscape at the north entry, north-to-south connection, east-to-west connection, and west-facing patio. Proposed materials include Austin Common brick or equivalent to match the existing house. 2) Install brick walls, retaining walls, and seat walls at new patios. 3) Install a built-in canopy at the southwest of the property. Materials include Austin Common brick or equivalent to match the existing house and kebony. 4) Install a vine screen fence at the property perimeter, retaining existing fencing as well. 5) Planting improvements throughout the site, including native planting areas and shade trees. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 6. Porches The proposed project appears to rebuild the existing front steps and remove railings reconstructed around 2017. Sites and streetscapes 1. Vegetation, topography, and landscaping The proposed landscaping eliminates most of the grass lawn in favor of plantings. It appears to grade the site to allow additional pavement for seating. 2. Walls and fences The proposed low vine screen is an appropriate complement to the existing wire fencing. The low brick walls and fences are appropriate in scale and materials. 3. Mechanical equipment and site appurtenances The built-in canopy structure at the rear of the house is a simpler replacement for an existing temporary structure. 4. Accessibility Proposed brick pathways appear appropriate for the site and compatible with the building. Summary The proposed project meets most of the standards. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION Choose plantings, furniture, and screening that enhance transparency so that the house is visible. Approve the application. The applicant has amended the design to incorporate Committee feedback. LOCATION MAP 8 – 2
8.1 - 1209 ROSEWOOD AVE - LANDSCAPE WORK — original pdf
Legend Legend 1 9 4 0 a e r i a l 1 9 5 8 a e r i a l Legend Notes 0 1/4/2024 300 600 ft 0 1/4/2024 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 300 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1 9 6 5 a e r i a l 1 9 7 6 a e r i a l Notes 0 1/4/2024 300 600 ft 0 This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for 300 the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or 600 ft This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic reference. No warranty is made by the City of Austin regarding specific accuracy or completeness. 1/4/2024 completeness. Legend Notes Notes CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024Property ProfileProperty ProfileProperty ProfileProperty Profile CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024 CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE1209 ROSEWOOD AVE | HAYNES-DELASHWAH HOUSE | LANDSCAPE WORKJanuary 10, 2024
9.0 509 E 6th St - Risher-Roach — original pdf
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEBRUARY 7, 2024 HR-2024-005072 RISHER-ROACH BUILDING, PART A 509 EAST 6TH STREET 9 – 1 PROPOSAL Rehabilitate the building and replace the storefront. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair and repaint the existing brick façade. 2) Replace the storefront within the existing openings. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Single-story brick structure with two arched windows and simple brick cornice detailing. The building has been painted. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project does not remove historic fabric from the building and repairs damaged masonry. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs damaged masonry and paints only previously painted brick. 11. Commercial storefronts The proposed storefront replaces only non-original material and appears appropriate in design and configuration. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Explore paint removal options if possible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 9 – 2
9.1 - 509 E 6th - drawings-presentation — original pdf
SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT REVITALIZATION 509 E 6TH STREET V I E W F R O M 5 0 0 B L O C K E A S T 6 T H S T R E E T L O O K I N G W E S T A U S T I N H I S T O R Y C E N T E R , c . 1 9 3 7 , A U S T I N , T E X A S H L C R E V I E W | 5 0 9 E 6 T H S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | F E B 0 7 , 2 0 2 4 509 E 6th Street 500 BLOCK PROPERTY SUMMARY: ADDRESS: DATE BUILT: 509 E 6TH STREET 1870 HISTORIC DESIGNATION: CoA HISTORIC LANDMARK Risher-Roach 1975 NHRP SURVEY: CONTRIBUTING SIXTH STREET SNAPSHOP RE-SURVEY, 2022: CONTRIBUTING CURRENT USE: VACANT . T S S E H C E N E 6TH ST. . T S R E V I R D E R SITE PLAN CURRENT PHOTOGRAPH (2022) S S E R G N O C S O Z A R B O T N I C A J N A S Y T I N I R T E 6 T H S E H C E N R E V I R D E R E N I B A S 5 3 - I SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND P R O P E R T Y O V E R V I E W H L C R E V I E W | 5 0 9 E 6 T H S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | F E B 0 7 , 2 0 2 4 NORTH ELEVATION: EXISTING 2023 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION B U I L D I N G C O M P A R I S O N O V E R T I M E H L C R E V I E …
20.1 - 2802 Pearce Road - Structural Report — original pdf
Client: Address: OBSERVATION REPORT Bill McKean 2802 Pearce Road, Austin, TX February 1, 2024 On 26 January 2024, George Breehl, Inspection Supervisor, observed the home at the above address to identify health or safety concerns and/or deviation from adopted codes and standards governing existing buildings which have resulted in reported leaks and structural damage in the home. A. Report Limitations Please note, this report is based on the visual examination of the structural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing. No intrusive examinations have been performed, and no samples of materials have been taken for laboratory testing. No mold or air quality testing was conducted. No water quality testing was conducted. The observations, opinions, and recommendations are based entirely upon our visual examination, compiled data, and interviews with the tenants/owners as applicable. No detailed structural analysis of existing members has been performed, and no rehabilitation designs are provided in this report. ATS Engineers makes no warranties or guarantees, either expressed or implied, that all items of a deficient nature and/or improper construction techniques, etc. have been discovered and commented upon in this report. This report has been prepared to identify current deficiencies observed on the date of inspection and should not be considered an exhaustive description of every item that may require remedial attention. In some cases, additional examinations may be warranted to fully evaluate the deficiencies noted. Portions of the items inspected were covered, inaccessible or unavailable, therefore, unable to be thoroughly inspected. B. General Description of the Home and Accessory Building The home is a one-story, wood-framed structure, which measures approximately 28 feet across the front and 54 feet along the sides. The exterior consists of natural stone bearing walls with some wood siding. The roof is covered with composition shingles (not original roofing material). Per Travis CAD records, the home was constructed ca. 1910. An accessory building measuring approximately 15 feet by 12 feet was noted at the rear left corner of the property. Like the main home, the building is covered with stacked natural stone, wood siding and composition roof shingles. Based on discussions with the Owner, we understand this property has not been occupied in 53 years. C. General Observations C01. Exterior: The front gable of the house is warped. There is a downward and inward curve of the gable framing. The wood columns at the front porch are leaning inward following the curvature of the gable. The …
20.2 - 2802Pearce_Survey — original pdf
55.20'1 -t 1- UVtKHtALJ llEC./TELE. LINE -EB- IR()N FFNr'F LI\JE NO.I BEARIN:: & DISTANCE I _LEGEND I.'.~TUAL S 56'0C -37" W 55.22' Ll L2 L3 lf'~CORJ s 56'03 00" w L~.::TUAL N oo·5:t17" E f'O:CORJ N 01'02'-JO" E ~.::TUAL N 25'51'41" E f;:CCORD N 26 '03'00" E 30.27' 30.24' 51.33' 51.26' - IRF e IPF0 IRFCe :c 4.8' J pp 7 - -ET N 42"53'30" N 42'56'00" E E )( ~ - "'-.:t f.D (])_ Oro N~ \ f - -51 1 1 1--<Xl c_.')..--- w_ S:CJ o_ < ~ ~~ ~ T2+ z <(y' 2m -503..00-------- ~-;:.J.OO I .~o'O-ao I I I I ' I r, I ' ROCK WALL (TYP.) 520 + :a -.;t s· , ~/', :a:o:-:-- - ,---~~-· "" -- - - -- ..- --, /" 1/r- I I ~-, 5' P.U.E. PER PLAT ·.r: :o.. -')- 1- xn wn z~ z_ <(Cl o_ <(_ ZLO <(1"- z <(' ::;;i:6 ' ' "' •" ;," - -7~o· uJ .'1- ..... :.i·: \ .\)<~~ ""~cf>\ :>> ··:.-:). cL ... BN USED: USED LAKE AUSTIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION, FURNISHED BY LCRA, AS BENCH MARK. £LEV 492.20' (APRIL 20, 2027) BW: "/" SET ON ':ONCRET£ DRAIN±_ 77.5 FT. FROM THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER £LEV 495 30' BU2: 5.9 1NDL£ SET IN TREE (TAG NO. 57 7). £LEV 497.28' PPOPEF..TY SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND EASEMENT RIGHTS RECORDED IN VOL. 43, PC. 79, PLAT RECORDS AND VOL. 3507, PG. 7 3.88, DEED RECORDS. E.:.SEMLNT RECORCED IN VOL. 2375, PC. 223, DEED RECORDS, DOES NOT APPEAR TO TRAVERSE THE PROPERTY. PAGE 1 OF 2 RO'-N) S·~rvey No. 21105-8 Sad lot is in Zone ___){____ as identified by the Fderal E-nergency Management Agency on Commur ty Panel No4-,.::8:::..&..,::::.5.:::3~C::_:0:::_:.4.:::3~0::.:,K.:_ ______ _ Dated: ~'AN. 22, 2020 LOT NO. I BLOCK NO . - - - - - PLAT OF SURVEY SCALE: 1" 30' GF 202003744 All corners are 1/2-inch iron rod found unless otherwise noted. To the lien holders and/or the owners of the premises surveyed. crTYAUSTIN A=IJITION oR SUBDIVISWN LEIGH ADDITION, VOLUME 43, PAGE 79, PLAT RECORDS s-:-REET ADDREss2802 PEARCE ROAD suRvEY fOR HERITAGE TITLE COMPANY OF AUSTIN, To: ALU-4NT NA T!Of'-.'AL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, S?~TE OF TEXAS, COUNTY C:Ji' TRAVIS I l-!EREBv CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE SURVEY WAS MADE THIS DAY ON THE GROUND AND IS TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THAT TKERE A:;E NO DISCREPANCES, CONFLICTS, SHORTAGES IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, VISIBLE UTILITY …
20.3 - 2802 Pearce Rd - Historic Commission Meeting Materials — original pdf
FRONT PORCH – ROOF & FRAMING “There is a downward and inward curve of the gable framing. The wood columns at the front porch are leaning inward following the curvature of the gable. The columns appear to be undersized. It was noted that the beam supporting the left side of the porch canopy is rotting with portions missing. The roofing at the front left side of the porch is rotted and falling.” STONEWORK “Large cracks were noted in the wall along the perimeter of the front porch. It was noted that some cracks were more than 1” wide; for reference cracks greater than 1/8” typically require structural repair. It appears that these wider cracks are partial recurrences of larger cracks (up to 3”) that were previously repaired.” FOUNDATION “The right side of the house appears to be a clear path for rain runoff… Part of the foundation along the right side and at the front of the entry porch has been undermined by the erosion… It was noted that the backyard drains towards the back of the house… It appears that the result of this is water migration into these areas of the house… The visible portions of the foundation framing of the house have completely deteriorated.” ROOF “Several holes were noted in the roof. This resulted in wet areas in the house and the rotting of some site-built roof trusses, window headers, and other lumber in the house. It appears that several trusses have been repaired previously… The construction of the roof trusses and the subsequent repairs appear to fall significantly short of acceptable engineering practices. It appears that the roofs of both buildings have begun to collapse.” INTERIOR “In general, the house is open to the elements… The house has an extraordinarily strong smell of mildew… It was also noted that some electrical splices were unprotected…. It was noted that the subfloor of the kitchen and the bathroom, including floor joists and beams, has almost completely rotted away. It was noted that the floor or the bathroom is filled with mildew. It was also noted that the walls were partially covered in mildew… The moisture and smell of the house poses a risk to the health and safety to persons on the property.” CONCLUSIONS “These buildings are dilapidated and unfit for habitation… Based on the number of structural deficiencies noted in the roofs of the main house and …
20.4 - 23062 McKean site plan - 2024-01-08 2 — original pdf
NEAREST CONTIGUOUS 40 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND A P P X. 5 8 2.7 2' PROJECT LOCATION A FULL RESIDENTIAL SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2019 NFPA 13D OR THE 2021 IRC P2904 STANDARDS WILL BE INSTALLED IN THIS PROPERTY. THE PLANS FOR THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM MUST DESIGNED AND INSTALLED BY A TEXAS LICENSED SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR FOR NFPA 13D SYSTEMS OR A TEXAS LICENSED PLUMBER WITH THE MULTIPURPOSE RESIDENTIAL FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SPECIALIST (MRFPSS) ENDORSEMENT. THE SPRINKLER PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, APPROVED, TESTED AND INSPECTED BY AFD PRIOR TO COVERING THE WALLS AND CEILINGS. A FLOW TEST OF THE MOST DEMANDING AREA WILL BE REQUIRED. LOT INFORMATION MAXIMUM ALLOWED BUILDING COVERAGE @ 40% = 17,703.74 SF MAXIMUM ALLOWED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE @ 45% = 19,916.71 SF CITY of AUSTIN AREA CALCULATIONS CoA AREA NAME a) 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA e) COVERED PARKING f) COV'D PATIO, DECK, PORCH, AND/OR BALCONY g) OTHER COVERED OR ROOFED AREA h) UNCOVERED WOOD DECK TOTAL BUILDING AREA EXISTING 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF IMPERVIOUS COVER CALCULATIONS TOTAL LOT AREA: 44,259.36 SF AREA NAME a) 1ST FLOOR CONDITIONED AREA e) COVERED PARKING f) COV'D PATIO, DECK, PORCH, AND/OR BALCONY g) OTHER COVERED OR ROOFED AREA EXISTING 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE (ONLY GROUND FLOOR AREAS INCLUDED FOR TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE) 0.00 SF CONC. DRIVE CONC. WALK EQUIP. PAD OTHER FLATWORK OUTDOOR STAIRS RETAINING WALL UNCOV'D WOOD DECK 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF 0.00 SF NEW 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 37.88 SF 6,206.54 SF NEW 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 2,070.71 SF 134.15 SF 26.23 SF 20.54 SF 57.34 SF 175.19 SF 18.94 SF 8,671.76 SF TOTAL 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 37.88 SF 6,206.54 SF TOTAL 3,445.89 SF 1,273.02 SF 1,228.96 SF 220.79 SF 2,070.71 SF 134.15 SF 26.23 SF 20.54 SF 57.34 SF 175.19 SF 18.94 SF 8,671.76 SF 6,168.66 SF 6,168.66 SF A WILDLAND LOCATION 12" = 1'-0" TOTAL IMPERVIOUS (UNCOV'D WOOD DECK COUNTED @ 50% FOR TOTAL IMPERVIOUS) TOTAL PROJECT BUILDING COVERAGE @ 6,168.66 SF = 13.94% TOTAL PROJECT IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE @ 8,671.76 SF = 19.59% THIS PROJECT WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE CLASS …
20.5 - Site Restrictions Diagram — original pdf
2802 PEARCE RD SITE RESTRICTIONS DIAGRAM NO DEVELOPMENT PER: - SETBACKS FRONT: 40’ SIDE: 10’ REAR: 20’ - LAKE AUSTIN ZONING (GREATER - LAKE AUSTIN ZONING (GREATER THAN 35% SLOPE) - TREE PROTECTION (1/2 CRZ OF PROTECTED & HERITAGE TREES) LIMITED DEVELOPMENT PER: - LAKE AUSTIN ZONING (15-25% SLOPE) - TREE PROTECTION (FULL CRZ OF PROTECTED & HERITAGE TREES) EXISTING STRUCTURES - SEE ATS ENGINEERING OBSERVATION REPORT - SEE PHOTOS DEVELOPMENT AREA: - MAX 50% IMPACT TO ANY PROTECTED OR HERITAGE TREE - ADA ACCESSIBILITY REQUIRED FOR OWNER (SEE FULL SURVEY BY SNS ENGINEERING FOR SURVEY LEGEND) LEGEND
7.b - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
7.c - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
7.d - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
7.e - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
7.f - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
7.g - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
7.h - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
Backup
Green and White Grocery HZ Application_2024 CORRECTED — original pdf
Historical Zoning Application: Green and White Grocery, 1201 E. 7th St. Applicant: John Lopez Cazares Date:1/31/24 Project Name: Green and White Grocery Project Street Address: 1201 E. 7th St. Existing Zoning: TOD-NP Area to be Rezoned: .1495 Acres Proposed Zoning: TOD-H-NP Qualifications for Landmark Designation: Architecture, Historical Association, & Community Value Owner information: John Lopez Cazares 1201 E. 7th Street Austin, Texas 78702 (512) 472-0675 Application Prepared by: Matthew Medina (Preservation Austin) & JuanRaymon Rubio (City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission) ___________________________________________________________________________ Qualifications for Landmark Designation 1201 E. 7th St. meets the qualifications for Local Historic Landmark designation based on the following criteria: Architecture, Historical associations, and Community Value. Architecture Green and White Grocery is a one-story wood frame building sited on the northwest corner of the block. The store is approximately 44’ by 74’, and has its main facade along E. 7th St. The store has had multiple additions since its initial construction in 1938. Sanborn maps, historic photos, and oral histories have helped determine the building’s growth over time, although some additions and modifications appear to have happened without documentation. The store was originally half the size and depth and likely received a rear addition in 1944 and a store enlargement in 1950.1 Subsequent additions to the end of the building after 1965 resulted in its current state. Today, the store is defined by its Craftsman style characteristics including decorative wood brackets and exposed rafter rails beneath the primary roof structure and the first-story awning, and a large clipped gable roof, also known as a jerkinhead roof. The building features composite siding at the exterior walls, asphalt composition shingles, and aluminum doors and windows. The main facade has a classic “Green & White Groc.” sign painted green with custom tube lighting letters. The west elevation has no windows, and the east elevation has a few hopper 1 Norverto, Lopez. “Building Permit.” 44660, Austin, Texas, 1950, Austin History Center. Historical Zoning Application: Green and White Grocery, 1201 E. 7th St. clerestory windows. A portion of the west elevation is defined by a rubble stone wall that extends along Waller St. towards the detached residence. The stone wall has entrance steps to the house and backyard. It appears in historic photos from the 1940s. The rear elevation has a protruding dormer at the southeast corner with a private store entrance. Changes to the building since the 1960s include removal of …
7.i - 1211 San Bernard - public comment — original pdf
For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later. Get Adobe Reader Now!
02.07.2024 Recorded Meeting — original link
Play video