Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Monday, July 19, 2021 3:32 PM PAZ Preservation Dessau Evangelical Lutheran Church move to Pioneer Farms This message is from Janet L Rice. [ Please, please vote to let the Dessau Lutheran Church be moved to Pioneer Farms. So much of our heritage has been lost ‐ this is a piece that is easy to save ‐ just vote yes. What are your reasons for not letting the church move? I know everything has gotten tangled in the pandemic and the inability to meet, but it has gone on for over a year as far as I can tell. Is there something that Pioneer Farms has done that the City doesn't like? Admittedly I'm biased, I've been a volunteer at the Farm since 1995. I've watched buildings be brought out ‐ most recently the Dodson house from a freedman's colony brought out one step ahead of the bulldozers. Do you want Austin's history lost? Is it because we are not a city agency? Please vote yes to the move, the church will be restored and cherished and help tell the story of Austin ‐ just like the Dodson house will do. Janet Rice, PhD, PE 1
From: Sent: To: Subject: Nancy Weiss Tuesday, July 20, 2021 8:46 PM PAZ Preservation Fwd: Historic Case: C14H-2000-0005 Review Case-HR21-103182-13300 Dessau Rd Bldg A Allen, Amber Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Commission Members, I would like to state that I am In Favor of Relocation of the Dessau Lutheran Church to Pioneer Farms. There is not a better location for this historic church to assure its preservation and its related history of my German relatives who settled here in Central Texas. Its present location puts it at extreme risk of loss of this historical gem from increased surrounding development which will prevent its future relocation. Placement of this church, which was built by Frederick Kruger, at Pioneer Farms adds to his work located there. I strongly urge you to approve this application as timely as possible in that this relocation project has been delayed for nearly three years which greatly continues to put this church at increased risk by remaining at the current site. Thank you for consideration of my request. Sincerely, Nancy S. Weiss, PhD Sent from my iPhone CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Ronnie Weiss Wednesday, July 21, 2021 9:21 AM PAZ Preservation Re: Relocation of Dessau Church - Historic Case Number: C14H-2000-0005 Review Case Number: HR 21-103182 - 13300 DESSAU RD Bldg A *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** wrote: On Jul 21, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Ronnie Weiss I apologize if this is not the correct place to communicate to the Historic Land Commission regarding an item on the agenda of the upcoming meeting of July 26th. First, and foremost, I urge the Historic Landmark Commission to approve the relocation of the Dessau church to the Jordan‐Bachman Pioneer Farm. This church is one of the few remaining examples of religious importance to the early settlers of Travis County. Immigrants (in this case from Germany) brought their faith with them and this church, while small, presents that importance. It is important, still, to many living in Travis County, myself included. Jourdan‐Bachmann is a living history lesson for our children. This church can bring the religious aspect to that history. If the church is not relocated it will probably not last long. Even the best efforts of the members of the Dessau Cemetery Association will not be enough to protect the church from vandalism and potentially destruction. This danger is heightened as the surrounding area is developed. In closing my petition, I see nothing but positives for relocating the church. It is a win‐win, of which we see very few these days. I appreciate your consideration of my request. Ronnie Weiss CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Kay Weiss Wednesday, July 21, 2021 9:53 AM PAZ Preservation Relocation of Dessau Lutheran Church Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello. As a 76 year old native Texan from the Cele‐Pflugerville area, I think it is very important to preserve Dessau Lutheran Church for future generations. Relocation to Pioneer Farms would be very appropriate for this part of our history. I hope you will see fit to endorse this move. I know that it will be a wonderful addition to Pioneer Farms and to the history of the Pflugerville area. Thank you so much for the work you are doing in preserving as much of our history as possible. I send all of you many blessings in the future. Sincerely yours, Karolyn Kay Weiss CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
Allen, Amber From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged Debbie Combest Wednesday, July 21, 2021 3:24 PM PAZ Preservation Historic Case Number: C14H-2000-0005. Review Case Number: HR21-103182-13300 DESSAU RD Bldg A *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Historical Landmark Commission, Thank you for your consideration of relocating the Evangelical Lutheran Church at Dessau to Pioneer Farms. I am in favor of relocation of the church to Pioneer Farms. We cannot delay the relocation any longer. The building is deteriorating as it sits and waits for a decision to be made. The proposed project of moving the church has been delayed for three years and the church is at increasing risk at its current site. The little church is an open invitation for vandalism. There is a tremendous amount of development going on around the building. It is getting eaten up by urban sprawl. How can it survive in it's current location? The longer we wait, the harder it will be to move. Then the argument will be, "Oh, it's just too hard to move it, now." We must preserve our Texas history! This building is a beautiful replica of the religious values of the early German settlers in Central Texas. So many people in our country now want to do away with our history. Here is a chance to save a remnat of our Texas history for future generations. We have a wonderful opportunity to move the church to a safe location, Pioneer Farms, next to the cabin of Frederick Kruger, one of the builders. In this location, everyone will have the opportunity to come and learn of the life of the 1800s, to see how people in the 1800s lived, and to appreciate the hard work it took just to live back in those days. The church contains a deep history in this area, including information that other congregations of early settlers, including Freedmen, once met there. Thank you for your devotion to saving our historical landmarks in Texas and for your consideration. We must save our history when and where we can! My family thanks you! Sincerely, Deborah Combest CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 26, 2021 C14H-1974-0006; HR-2021-100814 PAGGI HOUSE 200 LEE BARTON DR. B.5 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Replace existing butterfly roof and construct glass walls between the buildings to fully enclose the courtyard. 1) Expand an existing butterfly roof over the courtyard and create a conditioned, weather-tight space. The roof will extend southward to fully envelope the milk house, which is only partially covered by the existing roof. Floor-to-ceiling curtain walls will line the boundary between the courtyard and perimeter historic buildings, with minimal glass connections under the eaves. The curtain walls will consist of clear glass in muted gray frames, and the translucent roofing on the butterfly roof will be replaced with prefinished standing-seam metal. Concrete flooring will infill gaps in the existing slabs at the courtyard. 2) Renovate and construct a small addition to the existing restroom building at the west end of the courtyard. The building will be reclad with cement stucco. ARCHITECTURE The historic Paggi House includes four separate historic structures: the painted brick house and kitchen, the limestone milk house, and the plaster and limestone cistern, which remain in good condition from prior restorations. Additional freestanding accessory structures were built around the historic courtyard in 2010, including an expansive butterfly roof that partially covers the historic structures. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Commercial additions 1. Location Per Standard 1.1, the proposed enclosure is tucked within the historic courtyard, where it will be relatively inconspicuous. Standard 1.3 advises minimizing loss of historic fabric by connecting to the existing building through the most noninvasive location and methods. The curtain walls will extend as hyphens around existing door openings to create connections between the buildings and courtyard. Flashing at these locations will be the only physical modification to the historic buildings. 2. Scale, massing, and height The proposed project builds upon an existing roof over the courtyard, which is subordinate in scale to the historic buildings and minimally visible from its surroundings in keeping with Standards 2.1–2.3. 3. Design and style The addition will be executed in a modern style with restrained details that will not detract from the historic structures, per Standards 3.3 and …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 26, 2021 HR-21-101060 ALDRIDGE PLACE HISTORIC DISTRICT 3105 WHEELER STREET B.6 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a rear addition, construct a carport, and remove screens from front porch of a ca. 1927 contributing house. 1) Construct a 1-story addition and screened porch at rear of home. Remove and replace/reconfigure windows, patching and repairing siding in-kind where required, at north and east secondary elevations. The proposed addition is clad in vertical wood siding, with a standing-seam metal shed roof and exposed rafter tails at north and south eaves. 2) Add fully glazed door at north elevation for carport access. 3) Construct a detached carport. The carport is located to the south of the main building, set back approximately 3’ from the front wall of the house. It is supported by 6 4” steel tube columns. 4) Remove screen from front porch. Remove and replace decking with painted tongue-and-groove wood decking; replace ceiling to match. Refurbish wood porch columns. 5) Replace corrugated metal roof with standing-seam metal roof. 6) Repair, repaint, and reglaze existing windows in-kind where deteriorated. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS 1-story cross-gabled Craftsman bungalow with partially inset front-gabled porch. The porch is supported by box columns and is partially screened. The building is clad in false beveled siding with stucco in the gable ends. Eaves feature exposed rafter tails. Two sets of tripartite windows are present on the main façade. The Aldridge Place Historic District Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 5.1.2: Retention of Historic Style Respect the historic style of existing structures and retain their historic features, including character-defining elements and building scale. The proposed project does not endanger character-defining elements of the building, though historic windows at secondary elevations will be removed to accommodate the addition and side door. 5.1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism Respect each contributing structure as an example of the architecture of its time. Do not make alterations that have no historic basis, such as the addition of gingerbread trim to a 1920s bungalow. Do not give an existing contributing structure a “historic” appearance it never had. The proposed project appropriately differentiates new elements from the historic building and its materials. 5.1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing Structures Preserve the historic fabric whenever possible by repairing deteriorated historic features and architectural elements. …
GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DESCRIPTION SITE NOTES Cover Sheet / General Notes/ Site Plan Tree Preservation Plan 1. It is the intent of these Contract Documents to establish a high quality level of material and workmanship, but not necessarily to note and call for every last item of work to be done. Any item not specifically covered but deemed necessary for satisfactory completion of the work shall be accomplished by the Contractor in a manner consistent with the quality of work without additional cost to the owner. All material and methods of installation shall be in accordance with industry standards and manufacturer's recommendations. 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for a thorough review of all drawings specifications and existing conditions prior to commencement of work. This includes but is not limited to site utilities and the structural scope of work. The failure of the Contractor to report discrepancies and seek modification or change prior to commencement of work shall be construed as full acceptance of the condition in question by the Contractor. The Contractor shall assume responsibility for all work depicted by the Contract Documents regardless of whether the Subcontractors agree as to whose jurisdiction certain areas of the scope of work are under. 3. It shall be assumed that the Contractor and the Subcontractors are sufficiently experienced to be considered qualified in their respective work responsibilities. The Contractor shall insure that the Owner receives acceptable workmanship common to the industry from all Subcontractors and material suppliers and is responsible for hiring qualified staff personnel and/ or Subcontractors as necessary. 4. The Contractor shall verify the location of all existing utilities so that the work may proceed safely and be coordinated among all Subcontractors and personnel involved. The Contractor shall notify the Owner and Designer in advance of any work required by public utility entities that will affect the cost of schedule of the work. 5. The contractor shall meet all safety requirements applicable in the city of Austin and maintain a safe working environment for all personnel and occupants during the entire project. The jobsite is to be kept orderly and as clean as possible during all construction activities. 6. This drawing set is provided to communicate only the basic design of the building. Structural design by others, all plumbing and Electrical shall also be design build and shall be coordinated by contractor. 7. Any errors and omissions or inconsistencies …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Don Harris Allen, Amber Contreras, Kalan Re: 3105 Wheeler St. Existing Photographs Tuesday, July 20, 2021 10:10:34 AM thanks Don Amber, let me know if you want me to upload these on the permit app. The attached pictures note the front porch where we are proposing to remove the screen enclosure, the two sides, and the rear where we are proposing to remove an enclosed ‘laundry’ porch. Note the pink/peach colored garage belongs to the home next door and is built on the property line. The driveway access to it starts on my clients property and ends on the neighbors. This is the reason we are proposing a carport on the opposite side. *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Don Harris | Architect 307b W Monroe Austin Tx 78704 www.donharrisarchitect.com On Jul 20, 2021, at 8:57 AM, Allen, Amber <Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov> wrote: Hi Don, Our staff is currently reviewing this property in preparation for this upcoming Monday’s Historic Landmark Commission meeting. Could you provide some existing photos of the property? Thanks, Amber Allen Planner II, Historic Preservation Office City of Austin – Housing & Planning Department T: 512.974.3393 E: Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov.
From: To: Subject: Date: Allen, Amber Contreras, Kalan RE: 3105 Wheeler Monday, July 12, 2021 4:14:10 PM HI Steven, Thank you for the quick response. I have included Kalan Contreras from our office, she will be reviewing this case. Thanks, Amber Allen Planner II, Historic Preservation Office City of Austin – Housing & Planning Department T: 512.974.3393 E: Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov From: Steven Tomlinson <steven@abporter.org> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 2:21 PM To: Allen, Amber <Amber.Allen@austintexas.gov> Cc: Don Harris <donharrisarch@gmail.com>; Ryan Battle <RBattle@outlook.com> Subject: Re: 3105 Wheeler *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Amber: Ryan Battle presented the attached plans to the Aldridge Place HD board last month. The board unanimously agreed they are consistent with our design guidelines. We are excited about their planned renovation of the property. Please let me know if you need additional information from us. Steven Tomlinson Aldridge Place HD Board Chair On Jul 12, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Ryan Battle < wrote:
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 26, 2021 HR-21-099481 DAVIS-SIBLEY HOUSE 2210 WINDSOR ROAD B.7 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a carport at the rear of the house; eliminate a non-conforming rear staircase. The applicant seeks review of a new design for the rear carport and approval of the elimination of a non-conforming rear stair and replacement with a covered landing. The proposed carport is now lower and smaller than previously proposed, and does not obscure any of the architectural features of the back of the house. The rear stair is non-complying, and the applicant has decided to remove it and replace with a covered landing. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project meets the design standards with the exception of the rear stair, which the Architectural Review Committee has determined is a character-defining feature of the rear elevation of the house and should not be removed. The Committee had no issues with the revised design for the carport in the back of the house, but felt strongly that the rear stair sought for removal should be retained, as it is a character-defining feature. Staff acknowledges that the stair is non-conforming and would suggest ways to retain the look of the stair, even if it is non-functioning. The current proposal does not do that. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK STAFF RECOMMENDATION LOCATION MAP B.7 – 2 B.7 – 3
Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for a City Landmark or Local Historic District Adopted December 2012 The Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) reviews proposed exterior and site changes to City Historic Landmarks and properties in Local Historic Districts to assist owners in retaining the character-defining architectural features of important historic sites and districts. An approved Certificate of Appropriateness from the HLC is required in advance of performing all non-routine exterior and site work, including installation of signage. Your building permit will not be released without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness review by the City HPO or the HLC. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required for all non-routine exterior work, including alterations to historic materials or the visual appearance of a site or building façade. These include additions to existing buildings, construction of new buildings, re-painting of Landmarks with new colors, changes in roof color or materials, major landscape work including pools, and changes in sidewalks and driveways. HLC review is usually not required for ordinary maintenance work such as re-painting with existing colors and performing routine repairs using like materials. Please check with the City HPO if you are uncertain whether a historic review is required. Submit your building permit application for zoning review first, and provide a copy of the reviewed and stamped application and site plan to the City HPO prior to review by the HLC to ensure that your plans conform to all applicable zoning regulations. If a modifica- tion is required from the Residential Design and Compatibility Commission or Board of Adjustments, that approval must be obtained prior to review by the HLC. This form does not substitute for other required permit review applications. The City HPO may approve certain minor projects without a review by the HLC. Minor projects include the construction of one-story rear additions of less than 600 square feet, two-story additions not visible from the street, and pools, decks, fences, back porch enclo- sures or other minor features Submittal Requirements: _____1. One set of dimensioned building plans, with the scale indicated on each sheet, including elevations, floor plan, site plan or layout, and a roof plan. Plans must indicate all proposed exterior and site changes (additions, alterations, new construc- tion, or demolition). For changes and additions, the plan set must show existing and proposed conditions. Mechanical and electrical plans are not necessary. a. Elevation sheets must specify all exterior building materials and finishes …
Hello, See attached documents to be added to our Landmark review. The documents do not change our submittal, just better illustrate our intent. I have included 2 letters of support from neighboring properties. Our client has made us aware that other neighbors have directly submitted in addition to attached. Please let me know this email was received. Thanks for your time in reviewing our project, Mark Lakins
SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". = EXISTING FOOTPRINT = PROPOSED FOOTPRINT LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8 AND THE NORTH 20 FEET OF LOT 7, ENFIELD "D", A SUBDIVISION IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 3, PAGE 158 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS. PROPOSED CARPORT PROPOSED PORCH S 62°28'26" E 180.30' (180) " 0 - 5 ' . E . U . P 14'-1" EXISTING RESIDENCE EXISTING PORCH EXISTING POOL D A O E R S A E P ) ' 0 0 1 ( ' 2 1 . 0 2 1 ' E " 1 1 8 4 7 2 N ° EXISTING PORCH " / 8 3 7 - 3 1 ' 24'-0" EXISTING PORCH 25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK LOT LINE " ' 0 - 2 2 " 0 - 5 ' . E . U . P W I N S 0 1 ° 2 0 ' 5 D S O R " 6 W 1 R O 3 3 . 9 A 7 ' D MULCH 0 " D D E E 0 '- . L 6 B . 1 0 " R A R A B T 0 '- E R Y E S D A K C 5 '- P 0 " E U N 62°26'55" W 239.98' SITE PLAN 1 SHEET IS FORMATTED TO 22" X 34". SCALES ARE ONE HALF OF NOTED WHEN PRINTED TO 11" X 17". SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" TRUE NORTH ZONING SF-3-H LOT SIZE 25,252 SF TREE SCHEDULE TREE # SIZE/TYPE 776 23" CEDAR ELM 8719 34.5" CEDAR ELM 8703 CRAPE MYRTLE 8720 20" PECAN 8704 20" CEDAR ELM 85 SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 8706 24.5" LIGUSTRUM 86 SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 8707 19" RED OAK 91 CEDAR ELM 8708 33.5" RED OAK 01 LIVE OAK 8709 23" RED OAK 8711 CRAPE MYRTLE 8710 22" RED OAK 8718 19" RED OAK PROTECTED TREE NOTES: DRIP LINE CALCULATION 1'-0" PER 0'-1" OF TRUNK ALL TREES & NATURAL AREAS SHOWN ON PLAN TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. FENCING SHALL BE ERECTED ACCORDING TO CITY OF AUSTIN STANDARDS OF TREE PROTECTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMIT APPROVAL FOR REMOVAL OF TREES WITH A DIAMETER OF 19" OR MORE. ALL EXCAVATION UNDER TREE DRIP LINE TO BE DONE BY HAND. CUT …
CARPORT ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL NEW CARPORT- SLIGHTLY LOWER AND SMALLER EXISTING OPENING EXISTING OPENING CARPORT ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL PROPOSED PORCH NEW CARPORT- SLIGHTLY LOWER AND SMALLER EXISTING OPENING EXISTING OPENING
Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: 2210 Windsor Remodel From our neighbor to the south. -----Original Message----- From: Kent Ferguson <Kent_Ferguson@hcfd.com> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 10:36 AM To: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com>; Rae Hill <raehill@me.com> Subject: 2210 Windsor Remodel To: Austin Landmark Commission c/o Richard Suttle From: Kent Ferguson RE: 2210 Windsor Rd Proposed Remodel Modifications Date: July 9, 2021 To Whom It May Concern, I am the property owner of the house located 2208 Windsor Road in Austin, Texas which adjoins the southern property line of the subject property. I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the house which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. As the adjoining neighbor, I am delighted that the subject home is being restored so as preserve the character of our neighborhood. [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe 1
Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: From one of our neighbors. Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: Remodel 2210 Windsor Road On Jul 12, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Melissa Ferguson <melissa@montwalktx.com> wrote: To Whom It May Concern: I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the property at 2210 Windsor Road which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. I own the property at 2208 Windsor which is next door to the property on the south side. I love the plans for the home and think these two additions to the property will be beautiful! Thank you, Melissa Ferguson July 12, 2021 [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe Richard S. Hill Partner Direct: 512-538-0050 | Main: 512-835-4455 Address: 3700 North Capital of Texas Highway Suite 420 | Austin,Texas 78746 To help protect y ou r priv acy , Microsoft Office prev ented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Visit the New HPITX.com → This e-mail may contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete this message. 1
Mark Lakins From: Sent: To: Subject: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com> Tuesday, July 13, 2021 2:00 PM rsuttle@abaustin.com; Tim Cuppett; Mark Lakins FW: 2210 Windsor Remodel From our neighbor to the south. -----Original Message----- From: Kent Ferguson <Kent_Ferguson@hcfd.com> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 10:36 AM To: Richard Hill <hill@hpitx.com>; Rae Hill <raehill@me.com> Subject: 2210 Windsor Remodel To: Austin Landmark Commission c/o Richard Suttle From: Kent Ferguson RE: 2210 Windsor Rd Proposed Remodel Modifications Date: July 9, 2021 To Whom It May Concern, I am the property owner of the house located 2208 Windsor Road in Austin, Texas which adjoins the southern property line of the subject property. I have reviewed and approved the proposed plans for the back side of the house which includes a free standing carport and a roof overhang over the back door. As the adjoining neighbor, I am delighted that the subject home is being restored so as preserve the character of our neighborhood. [EXTERNAL] This email is from outside of HPI. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe 1
