HLC Committees ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • Reviews plans and advises applicants • Meets monthly PRESERVATION PLAN COMMITTEE • Periodic big-picture tasks related to Plan implementation (annual report, budget rec) • Meets 4-5 times per year OPERATIONS COMMITTEE • Assist with nuts and bolts of preservation plan implementation GRANTS COMMITTEE • TBD • Meets monthly or every other month • No appointments today
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JULY 2, 2025 HR-2025-060692 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4411 AVENUE B 10.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a rear two-story addition. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct an addition at the rear of the existing house, which contributes to the Hyde Park local historic district. Addition is proposed to be two-stories in height and located directly behind the existing one-story building. ARCHITECTURE The house at 4411 Avenue B is a single-story house with a corner inset porch that is supported by two wood posts. The building is elevated on piers with the crawlspace covered in a concrete skirt. The walls are clad in narrow teardrop siding with fascia above. A hipped roof clad in metal covers the entire house and is set at a moderate pitch. The front and side windows all appear to be original wood frames and covered in screens. The front entry is at the rear of the inset porch. Overall, the house has excellent integrity and is good condition. DESIGN STANDARDS The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 4. Residential Standards: Additions to Contributing Single Family and Multi-Family Structures 4.1. Preservation of Historic Character Any removal of original fabric is located entirely at the rear elevation. Though a two-story addition, it excellently reflects the form and style of the main house and overall district. 4.2. Location Addition is at the rear and will be minimally visible from the street. 4.3. Roof, Fenestration, and Siding Roof pitch and form matches the existing front house. Though likely not visible from the street, two second story windows on the front elevation are matching the configuration of the historic. Proposed siding is compatible with the existing. 4.4. Size and Scale of Addition Both floors of the addition match the floor-to-ceiling height of the original house. Second floor does not begin until over 15 feet from the front of the house and does not visually overwhelm the building. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Reduce the overall verticality of the addition if possible and refine the roof pitch to further reduce the visibility of the addition from the street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 10.0 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 10.0 – 3 Permit application, 2025 Zillow listing, 2025
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 2, 2025 PR-2025-029950; GF-2025-033059; HR-2025-056344 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1703 ALAMEDA DRIVE 14.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1939 house and construct a residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish the existing one-story house, which contributes to the National Register district. Construct a two-story house in generally the same location on the lot. ARCHITECTURE Built in a simple, minimal traditional form, the house at 1703 Alameda Drive is set at grade slightly above the street and is rectangular in plan with a small front porch cutout at one corner. The exterior is clad in horizontal wood siding, and original screen are present at the four front windows, along with a screen door at the rear of the porch for the main entry. There is minimal overhang from the hipped roof, which is clad in composition shingle. The house features numerous windows on all sides, typically paired or arranged in three units, side-by-side. A pier-and-beam foundation supports the one-story structure. The house is in good condition and has seen minimal alterations since construction. RESEARCH After construction around 1939, the house was first owned by Hiram & Doris Brown, who worked at local businesses such as Texas Cleaners & Shoe Repair. The Browns owned the property through World War II, and shortly after was sold to Charles & Bertha Kinney. Charles Kinney worked as a salesman and Bertha worked for many years as a clerk at the Internal Revenue Service. For a time, their adult son lived with them while attending the University of Texas. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location Proposed construction is generally on the same footprint as the existing house and matches setback to other houses on the street. 2. Orientation The proposed residence is oriented towards the street, like the existing house and neighbors on the same street. 3. Scale, massing, and height Generally, the neighbors on the same street have single-story houses or, if there is a second floor, it is setback from the front or visually hidden by a side-gabled roof. There is no setback in this design, nor does the plan call for breaking up the height …
1703 Alameda Goal • The owners are seeking approval for demolition to transform the property to better suit their needs and those of their aging family members. • They are committed to meeting the design standards and Alameda’s characteristics/influence • As the existing structure lacks “strong architectural elements”, we propose a solution that will: • Complement the district’s aesthetic and heritage • While meeting the homeowners’ functional needs Response to questions posed at ARC • Comment made: • Design/Exterior Materials: • Questions about consistency and appropriateness in the historic setting. • Observed that the design appears to take inspiration from a new neighboring house (stucco), rather than fitting the established character of the street. • Response • Updated with Craftsman-style elements and inspiration from the current house, reflecting the design principles of the Arts and Crafts period prevalent on Alameda Street • Mixed Materials: Combination of Sidings and Natural Wood • Decorative Trim: Board and Batten & Horizontal Siding with a lower siding detail to reflect the porch railing of the craftsman style • Decorative Brackets • Low Pitched Gabled Roof with large overhanging eaves • Inset Porches • Large Grouped Windows 1703 Alameda Dr – Updated Elevations 1703 Alameda Dr – Updated Elevations 1703 Alameda Dr – Rough Rendering 1703 Alameda Dr – Rough Rendering Response to questions posed at ARC • Comment made: • Garage Placement and Grade Issues: • Response • Visitability main living area was the primary focus • 5’ elevation gain (526’-532’) in the house footprint • Combination of excavation in the back yard to help reduce the overall height of the house and grading in the front of the house to help blend the driveway to the natural grade will be used • Concerns about the garage being set lower relative to the main floor, producing a split-level effect. • Questions about the site plan's handling of natural grade and the garage's elevation, with some confusion based on the submitted drawings. Area of Excavation Roughly 4’ of Elevation Change Influencing Contributing Houses on Alameda St 1507 Alameda Dr Contributing 1517 Alameda Dr Contributing 1809 Alameda Dr Contributing Response to questions posed at ARC • Comment made: • Suggestions included reconsidering the prominent arch (possibly removing it or replacing with a framed opening) to help scale and reduce visual disjunction. • Response • Replaced with an inset Craftsman-style porch for improved proportionality. • Removed imposing …
T.O.PLATE ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF BOARD & BATTEN " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 3 T.O.TRUSS T.O.PLATE " 0 - ' 0 1 " 8 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 0 1 FFE T.O.PLATE " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 0 1 FFE FRONT ELEVATION 1 3/32"=1'-0" Scale: T.O.PLATE T.O.TRUSS T.O.PLATE " 0 - ' 0 1 " 8 - ' 1 " 0 - ' 0 1 " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 3 T.O.PLATE " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 9 FFE FFE " 1 1 - ' 8 " 1 1 - ' 2 CURB T.O.PLATE " 8 - ' 1 1 FFE T.O.PLATE " 0 - ' 9 FFE I T M R E P R O F 1703 ALAMEDA Austin, TX 78704 A5 SIDE ELEVATION - NORTH 2 3/32"=1'-0" Scale: ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 9 " 6 - ' 3 OPEN TO SKY " 8 - ' 6 " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 8 SIDE ELEVATION - WEST 1 3/32"=1'-0" Scale: " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 9 " 0 - ' 8 I T M R E P R O F 2 3/32"=1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION - NORTH Scale: 1703 ALAMEDA Austin, TX 78704 A6
Play video
Burleson Smith 306 W. 34th St. Austin, TX 78705 Date: June 26, 2025 Historic Preservation Office Permitting and Development Center 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive Austin, TX 78752 RE: Letter of Support for Redevelopment at 300 W 34th Street, Austin, TX Dear Members of the Planning Commission, I am writing as a neighbor and local resident in strong support of the proposed residential redevelopment at 300 W 34th Street. As someone who lives in the immediate area, I believe this project represents a thoughtful and much-needed investment in our neighborhood. The 34th Street corridor is an essential part of central Austin, offering walkable access to key amenities, public transportation, and the University of Texas campus. Enhancing housing availability in this location is both practical and aligned with the city's goals of increasing urban density in well-connected areas. From what I understand, the redevelopment will replace an aging structure with new, high- quality housing that is more energy-efficient, safer, and better suited to meet current needs. housing choices for students, young professionals, and long-time residents alike. Far from disrupting the character of our neighborhood, this redevelopment has the potential to enhance it bringing renewed vitality and ensuring that this area remains a desirable and accessible place to live. As housing pressures grow across Austin, I appreciate forward-looking projects like this one that seek to add supply in a responsible, community- conscious way. I respectfully urge the Planning Commission and all reviewing bodies to approve the proposal and allow this much-needed investment in our neighborhood to move forward. Sincerely, Burleson Smith
Backup
HIGGINSSTRUCTURALENGINEERINGDESIGNS1103 Lambie St. Unit B, ATXwww.higgins-designs.comProject Address:Report Date:Project No:300 W. 34th St., Austin, TX 787052501606/26/2025Page No.:1 of 14Limited Structural Visual AssessmentReport Prepared For: Exmouth Holdings TX LLCDate of Assessment: June 20th, 2025Date of Report: June 26th, 2025Report Prepared By: Higgins-Designs, PC (TBPE F-23989)1103 Lambie St. Unit B, Austin TX 78702Benjamin Higgins, PE HIGGINSSTRUCTURALENGINEERINGDESIGNS1103 Lambie St. Unit B, ATXwww.higgins-designs.com1. Scope of InvestigationThe scope of this structural assessment was limited to a visual investigation of the foundation and framing systems ofthe subject property located at 300 W. 34th St., Austin, TX 78705. The visual assessment included:(cid:127)Interior and exterior building areas and spaces.(cid:127)Visible foundation elements and framing systems.(cid:127)Identification of noticeable structural deficiencies or areas of structural concern.The investigation did not include detailed inspections of concealed structural elements or conditions, and was limitedstrictly to readily-visible components. No finishes, cladding, coverings, or other obstructions were removed.Items Outside the Scope:The following items were specifically excluded and are not included in this report:(cid:127)Destructive or non-destructive material testing and inspections.(cid:127)Hazardous material identification or testing.(cid:127)Verification of structural compliance with current or historical building codes.(cid:127)Energy performance assessments, modeling, or code compliance.(cid:127)Historical or archeological reviews and assessments.(cid:127)Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) system evaluations.2. Report ContentIncluded within this report are:(cid:127)Summary of site observations conducted during the visual structural assessment.(cid:127)An assessment of the overall structural condition of the building’s foundation and framing.(cid:127)Recommendations for remedial or corrective actions.All observations and recommendations in this report were developed based on site visits, visual assessments, andgeneral industry knowledge and practices related to similar structures.No warranties, expressed or implied, are provided by this report.3. Limitations and ExclusionsThis structural condition assessment was restricted to visible and readily accessible elements. Concealed orunforeseen conditions uncovered in future work may require revisions to the conclusions or recommendationsprovided herein.The consultant requests notification if:(cid:127)Field conditions differ significantly from conditions documented in this report.(cid:127)Changes occur to the planned project or its scope.(cid:127)Additional structural documentation or historical records become available.Project Address:Report Date:Project No:300 W. 34th St., Austin, TX 787052501606/26/2025Page No.:2 of 14Limited Structural Visual Assessment HIGGINSSTRUCTURALENGINEERINGDESIGNS1103 Lambie St. Unit B, ATXwww.higgins-designs.com4. Property SummaryProperty Address: 300 W. 34th St., Austin, TX 78703Property Usage: Single-family residentialNumber of Buildings: 1Number of Stories: 1Approximate Square Footage: Approximately 1,400 SFYear of Construction: 1917Superstructure Type: Conventional wood framing with a hipped roofFoundation Type: Conventional pier-and-beam5. Property DescriptionThe subject property is a one-story, approximately 1,400 square foot single-family residence located at 300 W.34th St in Austin, Texas. The structure was originally constructed in …
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING of the HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, June 27, 2025 – 8:30 AM Permitting and Development Center – Room 4001 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, TX 78752 Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, (D-8) Chair Roxanne Evans (D-2), Vice Chair Jeffrey Acton (Mayor) Harrison Eppright (D-1) Kevin Koch (D-3) Judah Rice (D-4) Harmony Grogan (D-5) Carl Larosche (D-6) Jaime Alvarez (D-7) Bat Taniguchi (D-9) Trey McWhorter (D-10) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. 2. Presentation and discussion on the Historic Preservation Office, Commission review processes, historic designations, and Historic Landmark Commission Committees. Presenter: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office Presentation and discussion on dais procedures, duties, and discussions. Presenter: Kelly Little, Certified Local Government Program, Texas Historical Commission 1 3. 4. 5. Presentation and discussion on the Heritage Preservation Grant Program. Presenter: Melissa Alvarado, Heritage Tourism Division, Office of Arts, Culture, Music, and Entertainment Presentation and discussion on Robert’s Rules of Order and standard motion language. Presenter: Mary Marrero, City of Austin Law Department Presentation and discussion on the Equity-Based Preservation Plan. Presenter: Cara Bertron, Historic Preservation Office ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-3393 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Historic Landmark Commission, please contact Sam Fahnestock, Historic Preservation Planner II, at 512-974-3393; Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Planner Senior, at 512-978-0766; or Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Officer, at 512-974-2727. 2 3
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING of the HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION FRIDAY, June 27, 2025 – 8:30 AM Permitting and Development Center – Room 4001 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr. Austin, TX 78752 Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, (D-8) Chair Roxanne Evans (D-2), Vice Chair Jeffrey Acton (Mayor) Harrison Eppright (D-1) Kevin Koch (D-3) Judah Rice (D-4) Harmony Grogan (D-5) Carl Larosche (D-6) Jaime Alvarez (D-7) Bat Taniguchi (D-9) Trey McWhorter (D-10) REVISED AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. 2. Presentation and discussion on the Historic Preservation Office, Commission review processes, historic designations, and Historic Landmark Commission Committees. Presenter: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office Presentation and discussion on dais procedures, duties, and discussions. Presenter: Kelly Little, Certified Local Government Program, Texas Historical Commission 1 3. 4. 5. Presentation and discussion on the Heritage Preservation Grant Program. Presenter: Melissa Alvarado, Heritage Tourism Division, Office of Arts, Culture, Music, and Entertainment Presentation and discussion on Robert’s Rules of Order and standard motion language. Presenter: Mary Marrero, City of Austin Law Department Presentation and discussion on the Equity-Based Preservation Plan. Presenter: Cara Bertron, Historic Preservation Office ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call the Historic Preservation Office at 512-974-3393 for additional information; TTY users route through Relay Texas at 711. For more information on the Historic Landmark Commission, please contact Sam Fahnestock, Historic Preservation Planner II, at 512-974-3393; Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Planner Senior, at 512-978-0766; or Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Officer, at 512-974-2727. 2 3
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Wednesday, June 11, 2025 – 4:00PM Permitting and Development Center Conference Room 1401 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Dr Austin, TX 78752 Some members of the committee may be participating by videoconference Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item NOT on the agenda once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, use the QR code or the link on this agenda. For questions, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Kevin Koch Jaime Alvarez Harmony Grogan CALL TO ORDER AGENDA PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first ten (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. 2. 211 Red River St. Trask House Council District 9 Proposal: Relocation to Pioneer Farms. Applicant: Austin Convention Center Department, City of Austin 201 Red River St. Castleman-Bull House Council District 9 Proposal: Temporary relocation. Applicant: Austin Convention Center Department, City of Austin 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 600 Harthan St. Harthan Street Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Total demolition of a contributing building in a Local Historic District. Applicant: Jewels Cain 713 Congress Ave. Paramount Theatre Heritage Grant Project Council District 9 Proposal: Preservation of front façade, balcony doors, transoms, pediments, and windows. Applicant: Jonathan Humphrey, Austin Theatre Alliance 811 W Live Oak St. Green Pastures Council District 3 Proposal: New construction on a Landmark site. Applicant: Patrick Lucas, Clayton Korte 1111 Red River St. New Orleans Club & Hardeman House Council District 9 Proposal: Replace subgrade plumbing waste lines. Applicant: Efrain Velez, Waterloo Greenway Conservancy 1403 S Congress Ave. Bergen-Todd House Council District 9 Proposal: Rear addition, side deck addition, relocation of accessory cabin onto property. Applicant: Victoria Haase 1606 Wethersfield Rd. Old West Austin National Register Historic District Council District 10 Proposal: Total demolition of a non-contributing building and contributing garage, new construction of a two-story residence. Applicant: Victoria Haase 1611 Wethersfield Rd. Old West Austin National Register Historic District Council District 10 Proposal: Partially demolish and remodel a contributing structure. …
CASTLEMAN-BULL AND TRASK HOUSE RELOCATION FOR AUSTIN ENERGY DISTRICT CHILLED WATER PLANT Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: EXISTING SITE TRASK HOUSE HISTORIC ZONING CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: EXISTING SITE TRASK HOUSE HISTORIC ZONING FUTURE AUSTIN ENERGY DISTRICT CHILLED WATER PLANT SUBGRADE FOOTPRINT CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: TRASK HOUSE - THC RTHL BUILT: 1850s RELOCATED: 1990 RENOVATED: 1992 ORIGINAL ADDRESS: 105 Neches Street CURRENT ADDRESS: 217 Red River (sometimes listed as 211 Red River) Note, current site has Historic Zoning Trask House Today Notes From City Planning Commission Meeting on 5/3/77 Trask House at Original Location, Sanborn map from 1900 Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: TRASK HOUSE – PROPOSED LOCATION PROPOSED LOCATION 50' WEST OF ORIGINAL LOCATION RELATIONSHIP TO WALLER CREEK RELATIONSHIP TO NECHES ST ALIGNMENT Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: TRASK HOUSE – PROPOSED LOCATION PROPOSED LOCATION 50' WEST OF ORIGINAL LOCATION RELATIONSHIP TO WALLER CREEK RELATIONSHIP TO NECHES ST ALIGNMENT Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: TRASK HOUSE – POTENTIAL TEMPORARY LOCATION PROPOSED TRASK HOUSE PERMANENT LOCATION POTENTIAL TEMPORARY LOCATION EXIST. TRASK HOUSE LOCATION APPROX. PROPOSED MOVE PATH Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: TRASK HOUSE – LIMITS OF DECONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF PORCH TO BE DETACHED AND MOVED LINE OF DETACHMENT MASONRY TO BE SALVAGED Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE – PROPOSED NEW AUSTIN LOCAL LANDMARK BUILT: 1873 RELOCATED: 2001 EXTERIOR RENOVATED: 2019 ORIGINAL ADDRESS: 308 E 7TH CURRENT ADDRESS: 201 Red River Castleman-Bull House Today Castleman-Bull House in its original location, THC Historic Resources Survey Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, 2025 Date: CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE – PROPOSED LOCATION EXIST. TRASK HOUSE LOCATION PROPOSED AUSTIN ENERGY DISTRICT CHILLED PLANT BELOW GRADE EXIST. CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE LOCATION PROPOSED CASTLEMAN-BULL HOUSE PERMANENT LOCATION WATERLOO GREENWAY TRAILHEAD Castleman-Bull/Trask E 3rd St & Red River St Project: Location: Phase: - June 11th, …
DLR Group of North Carolina, P.C. a North Carolina corporation 1213 West Morehead Street, Suite 210 Charlotte, NC 28208 March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Assessment and Recommendations Existing Windows and Doors on Congress Avenue Elevation, 2nd and 3rd Floors Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 PART 1: CONDITION ASSESSMENT Areas of Condition Assessment: This report is to assess the condition of the double-hung windows and balcony doors at the second and third floors of the Congress Avenue elevation of the Paramount Theatre in Austin. Figure 1.1: Clip of original 1915 Paramount Theater plans with areas of assessment highlighted. 2 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 1.1 Assessment of Existing Double-hung windows, 2nd and 3rd floors: a) The double hung windows are very possibly original. b) The window glass was shown to be replaced in the 1980 Renovation plans. No other work to the windows was shown in those plans. c) The windows sills are the most degraded and show significant water and sun damage. d) The bottom stile and rails of the bottom sashes are in mediocre condition. e) The putty holding in the glass has previously failed and was not neatly tooled where re-applyed f) All counterweights are broken or removed; most windows are painted shut (only two still open, which are used to access the roof of the marquee). g) The windows are not air-tight and let in drafts of air and dust. h) Exposed lintels above the windows are freshly painted and rust-free. i) Maintenance has included scheduled repainting of the exterior and re-puttying glass as needed. Figure 1.2: .... 3 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 Figure 1.3: Areas of poor condition, exterior Figure 1.4: Interior view of existing windows 4 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 Figure 1.5: Window hardware overpainted; counterweight non-functional Figure 1.6: Windows painted shut; glazing putty untooled 5 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 1.2 Assessment of Existing Balcony Doors,. Pediments, & Transoms, 3rd floor 6 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 7 Paramount Theatre, Austin Window Condition Report and Recommendations March 2025 UPDATED 9 JUNE 2025 …
Waterloo GreenWay Symphony Square plumbinG renonvationS arC preSentation 06.11.2025 Symphony Square headquarterS Site Context Symphony Square ConStruCtion Site (1976-1978) hardeman houSe oriGinal loCation (pre 1976) Symphony Square ConStruCtion Site (1976-1978) reConneCtion propoSed abandoned neW orleanS Club neW C.o. trenChinG neW orleanS Club Courtyard trenChinG pavilion Courtyard trenChinG neW orleanS Club C o u r t y a r d t r e n C h i n G baSement Wall paththru loCation 1 baSement Wall non-StruCtural paththru loCation baSement Wall path thru loCation 2 exiStinG meChaniCal room outdated equipment Will be removed G n i h C n e r t d r a y t r u o C neW ConneCtion behind property line i G n h C n e r t d r a y t r u o C exiStinG Coa-SS mh and path roW not in SCope no modifiCationS propoSed exiStinG roW C.o. ConneCtion behind property line pavilion neW orleanS Club hardeman houSe neW orleanS Club pavilion hardeman hoiuSe queStionS?
- 0 " 1 ' / 3 " 9 . 1 0 F9 2 6 . 6 0 F5 1 7 . 6 0 F8 1 8 . 6 0 F5 1 4 . 6 0 F7 1 106 (5'-0" 8'-0") 5 . 6 0 F7 1 ASSUMED EXISTING ROOF RIDGE V.I.F. NEW HABITABLE ATTIC DORMER NOT TO EXCEED RIDGE. LEVEL 2 T.O.P. SET RELATIVE TO EXISTING RIDGE/NEW DORMER. ALIGN EAVES OF NEW ROOF TO EAVES OF NEW DORMER. NOTIFY ARCHITECT IF MIN. T.O.P. OF 7'-7 3/4" CANNOT BE ACHIEVED. COA BUILDING HEIGHT 22' - 7 1/4" EXG. ROOF RIDGE 20' - 6 1/4" LEVEL 2 T.O.P. 19' - 3" LEVEL 2 11' - 7 1/4" LEVEL 1 T.O.P. 10' - 0 1/8" EXG. LEVEL 1 11" A.A.G. 8 1/4" EXG. LIVING 0" 3 A-301 7 " / 1 '- 0 " 7" / 1'-0" - 0 " 1 ' / 3 " 206B (4'-0" 6'-8") 114B (4'-0" 8'-0") TENT PORTION 3 SD.1 METAL RAILING " 0 - ' 3 " 0 - ' 5 1 " 4 / 3 7 - ' 7 " 8 / 1 7 - ' 1 " 8 / 1 1 - ' 9 " 1 1 - ' 1 2 . F . I . V . G X E FINISH SCHEDULE KEY A.S.1 BRK.1 BRK.2 C.P.1 PNT.1 ASPHALT SHINGLE, FINAL SELECTION BY OWNER. BRICK TO MATCH EXG. BRICK PAVERS TO MATCH EXG. CEMENT PLASTER UNDERPINNING, SMOOTH BURNISHED W/ INTEGRAL COLOR TO MATCH SIDING. EXTERIOR BASE WALL PAINT COLOR. EXTERIOR ACCENT WALL COLOR. EXTERIOR ACCENT COLOR. PNT.2 PNT.3 PNT.4 METAL PAINT. DARK BRONZE. S.S.1 SD.1 SD.2 WD.1 EXTERIOR RAILS. PRE-FINISHED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF CLADDING W/ CONTINUOUS ICE & WATER SHIELD UNDERLAYMENT. COMPOSITE 5" HORIZONTAL SIDING, PAINTED PNT.1 U.N.O. COMPOSITE PANEL SIDING, PAINTED PNT.2 U.N.O. PRE-FINISHED TONGUE & GROOVE SQUARE EDGE SOFFIT. FINAL SELECTION BY OWNER. FINISH NOTES: 1. 2. ALL EXTERIOR HORIZONTAL SIDING TO BE PAINTED PNT.1 U.N.O. ALL EXTERIOR PANEL SIDING, COLUMNS, SHUTTERS, AND TRIM TO BE PAINTED PNT.2 U.N.O. COA BUILDING HEIGHT 22' - 7 1/4" EXG. ROOF RIDGE 20' - 6 1/4" LEVEL 2 T.O.P. 19' - 3" LEVEL 2 11' - 7 1/4" LEVEL 1 T.O.P. 10' - 0 1/8" EXG. LEVEL 1 11" A.A.G. 8 1/4" EXG. LIVING 0" I T H G E H G N D L I U B A O C I 2 …
SITE NOTES EROSION CONTROL 1. The contractor shall install erosion/sedimentation controls and tree/natural area protective fencing prior to any site preparation work (clearing, grubbing or excavation). 2. The contractor is required to inspect the controls and fences at weekly intervals and after significant rainfall events to insure that they are functioning properly. The person(s) responsible for maintenance of controls and fences shall immediately make any necessary repairs to damaged areas. Silt accumulation at controls must be removed when the depth reaches six (6) inches. TREE PROTECTION 1. All trees and natural areas shown on plan to be preserved shall be protected during construction with temporary fencing. 2. Protective fences shall be erected according to City of Austin Standards for Tree Protection. 3. Protective fences shall be installed prior to the start of any site preparation work (clearing, grubbing or grading), and shall be maintained throughout all phases of the construction project. 4. Erosion and sedimentation control barriers shall be installed or maintained in a manner which does not result in soil build-up within tree drip lines. 5. Protective fences shall surround the trees or group of trees, and will be located at the outermost limit of branches (drip line) , for natural areas, protective fences shall follow the Limit of Construction line, in order to prevent the following: A. Soil compaction in the root zone area resulting from vehicular traffic or storage of equipment or materials; B. Root zone disturbances due to grade changes (greater than 6 inches cut or fill), or trenching not reviewed and authorized by the City Aborist; C. Wounds to exposed roots, trunk or limbs by mechanical equipment; D. Other activities detrimental to trees such as chemical storage, cement truck cleaning, and fires. VISITABLE EXTERIOR ROUTE 1:12 SLOPE = 8.3% VISITABLE ENTRANCE SURFACE SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM, AND SLIP RESISTANT. PAVERS USED AS AN EXTERIOR VISITABLE ROUTE SHALL BE LEVEL WITH GAPS NO MORE THAN 1/2 IN. THE GAPS SHALL BE FILLED WITH A MATERIAL THAT IS STABLE AND FIRM AND LEVEL WITH THE PAVERS. THE ROUTE ALSO SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 36" WITH A CROSS SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 2% E P O L S 2 1 : 6 2 1 : 6 E P O L S E P O L S 2 1 : 6 6:12 SLOPE 6:12 SLOPE 2 1 : 6 E P O L S E P O …
1703 Alameda Historic Landmark Commission Response Introduction We are pleased to submit this architectural proposal for a modest guest house designed in partnership with well known local architects for a young family living in the adjacent home. Unfortunately, we aren’t able to make the meeting, but we remain fully committed to the process. The homeowners—Austin residents with two small children—purchased the neighboring property to create a dedicated space for their elderly mother as well as enhance their outdoor living environment with a park-like setting. Jack Boothe Construction built their current home and has now been entrusted to lead this project as well, with the shared goal of creating a thoughtful, cohesive addition to their property. Over the past decade, Jack Boothe Construction completed several high-quality homes in Travis Heights. We have the reputation to always build with great care to complement the fabric of the neighborhood. We welcome thoughtful feedback from the Committee that can help refine and improve this plan as we continue our commitment to building responsibly and respectfully within this historic community. Scale, massing, and height • HLC Comment: Generally, the neighbors on the same street have single-story houses or, if there is a second floor, it is setback from the front or visually hidden by a side-gabled roof. There is no setback in this design, nor does the plan call for breaking up the height visually from the ground to the top of the second story. • Reply: Both adjacent properties—one of which is a contributing structure—are two-story homes. The proposed second story at 1703 Alameda has been carefully designed with thoughtful setbacks to reduce visual impact: 12 feet from the leftmost forward wall, 4 feet from the front of the porch, and 13 feet from the rightmost portion of the front-facing wall. Additionally, the front porch features its own distinct roofline, which further helps to break up the vertical massing and soften the visual transition from the ground level to the second story. • HLC Comment: The massing features the two-story central mass with a projecting front garage and a corner bedroom on the ground floor, along with a kitchen and living room at the rear.” • Reply: The two-story central mass of 1703 Alameda is set back from the projecting front-facing garage and the corner bedroom on the ground floor. A covered front porch, positioned between these two elements, further breaks up the front …
O GENERAL NOTES I D U T S N G I S E D I R U T © D E I F I C E P S E H T R O F D E P O L E V E D N E E B E V A H S L A I R E T A M E S E H T . W A L T H G I R Y P O C Y B D E T C E T O R P E R A D N A ) S D A ( O I D U T S N G I S E D E I L A D U A F O Y T R E P O R P E V I S U L C X E E H T E R A G N I W A R D S I H T N I D E T C I P E D S N A L P D N A , S T N E M E G N A R R A , S N G I S E D , S T P E C N O C L L A : E C I T O N T H G I R Y P O C . E C I F F O S D A E H T O T D E T R O P E R E B T S U M S G N I W A R D E S E H T N I N W O H S S N O I T I D N O C D N A S N O I S N E M I D E H T M O R F S E I C N A P E R C S I D Y N A . S N O I T I D N O C D N A S N O I S N E M I D B O J L L A R O F Y T I L I B I S N O P S E R E M U S S A D N A Y F I R E V O T D E R I U Q E R E R A S R O T C A R T …
Play audio
Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for June 4, 2025 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, fill out the Microsoft Form. QR code and link at the bottom of this document. PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 1. C14H-2025-0022 – 1701 San Gabriel St. Graves House Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed May 7, 2025) Applicant: Sean Reynolds City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 2. C14H-2025-0059 – 2500 Nueces St. Whitehall Cooperative Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Whitehall Intentional Society City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 3. HR-2025-039309 – 900 Chicon St. Old Administration Building, Huston-Tillotson University Heritage Grant Project Council District 1 Proposal: Remove and replace basement wall membrane. Applicant: Canary Gallion City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Commented [MK1]: @Lukes, Austin Making sure that this is correct. Commented [LA2R1]: Confirmed, it is H-T University 4. HR-2025-057874 – 600 Harthan St. Harthan Street Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Total demolition of a contributing building. Applicant: Jewels Cain City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 National Register District Permit Applications 5. DA-2025-055682 – 1212-1214 W 6th St. West Line National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Total demolition. Applicant: Jewels Cain City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 6. PR-2025-029950; HR-2025-056344 – 1703 Alameda Dr. Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Demolish a contributing building, new construction. (Demolition postponed May 7, 2025) Applicant: Brian Randall City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 7. HR-2024-123060 – 1003 Maufrais St. West Line National Register Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Construct a new addition and remodel a contributing building. Construct a new cabana and pool. (Postponed May 7, 2025) Applicant: Jennifer Hanlen City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 8. PR-2024-159632 – 705 West Lynn St. West Line National Register Historic …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, June 4th, 2025 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, please use the QR code or link at the end of this document. For questions, please email preservation@austintexas.gov. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, (D-8) Chair Roxanne Evans (D-2), Vice Chair Jeffrey Acton (Mayor) Harrison Eppright (D-1) Kevin Koch (D-3) Judah Rice (D-4) Harmony Grogan (D-5) Carl Larosche (D-6) Jaime Alvarez (D-7) Bat Taniguchi (D-9) Trey McWhorter (D-10) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 7, 2025 – Offered for consent approval. 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 2. C14H-2025-0022 – 1701 San Gabriel St. Graves House Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed May 7, 2025) Applicant: Sean Reynolds City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to July 2, 2025. 3. C14H-2025-0059 – 2500 Nueces St. Whitehall Cooperative Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Whitehall Intentional Society City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the proposed zoning change from multifamily-neighborhood plan (MF-4-NP) to multifamily-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (MF-4-H-NP) combining district zoning. Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 4. HR-2025-039309 – 900 Chicon St. Old Administration Building, Huston-Tillotson University Heritage Grant Project Council District 1 Proposal: Remove and replace basement wall membrane. Applicant: Canary Gallion City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Approve the certificate of appropriateness in concurrence with Architectural Review Committee feedback. 5. HR-2025-057874 – 600 Harthan St. Harthan Street Local Historic District Council District 9 Proposal: Demolish a contributing building. Applicant: Jewels Cain City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Concur with Committee feedback and …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2025-0059 HLC DATE: June 4, 2025 PC DATE: TBD CC DATE: TBD APPLICANT: Alessio Franko for Whitehall Intentional Society (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Whitehall Cooperative, Alpha Epsilon Phi WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 2500 Nueces Street, ZONING CHANGE: MF-4-NP to MF-4-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from multifamily- neighborhood plan (MF-4-NP) to multifamily-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (MF-4-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture, community value, and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Central Austin Combined: West University Neighborhood Plan, Austin Independent School District, Austin Neighborhoods Council, CANPAC (Central Austin Neigh Plan Area Committee), Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, Shoal Creek Conservancy, University Area Partners, West Campus Neighborhood Association DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2020 North Central Austin Historic Resource Survey did not recommend the property for individual local or National Register listing; however, no research on the home’s significance was done at that time. Throughout 2024, City staff and Preservation Austin worked with Whitehall Cooperative leadership to highlight this building’s deep significance as an Austin institution. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: The historic zoning application summarizes Whitehall Cooperative’s importance to Austin, to the University of Texas, to the history of women University students’ resilience and ambition, to integration efforts during the mid-twentieth century, and to the cooperative housing movement across Texas: Whitehall Cooperative, the oldest independently run residential cooperative in Texas, has a rich history that dates to 1896. Originally built by Samuel D. Harlan as a single-family home, it was later transformed into a boarding house in the 1920s to accommodate University of Texas students. The property…was purchased by Whitehall in 1960 and became a hub for student activism and affordable housing. Over the years, Whitehall has been a model for cooperative living, emphasizing shared responsibilities and democratic decision-making. The cooperative has expanded to include non-students, contributing to Austin’s broader cooperative movement by supporting various community initiatives, including the founding of Wheatsville Co-op and the People's Community Clinic. Today, Whitehall remains an affordable, community-oriented space for people of all ages and backgrounds, maintaining its historical charm while adapting to the needs of its diverse members.1 § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; …
City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet A. APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC ZONING PROJECT INFORMATION: DEPARTMENTAL USE ONLY APPLICATION DATE:__________________ FILE NUMBER(S) _____________________________________________ TENTATIVE HLC DATE: TENTATIVE PC or ZAP DATE:_________________ TENTATIVE CC DATE:_________________ CASE MANAGER _______________________________ APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:________________________________________ CITY INITIATED: YES / NO ROLLBACK: YES/NO BASIC PROJECT DATA: 1. OWNER’S NAME:________________________________________________________________________________ 2. PROJECT NAME:________________________________________________________________________________ 3. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (or Range): __________________________________________________________ ZIP__________________________ COUNTY:______________________________________ IF PROJECT ADDRESS CANNOT BE DEFINED ABOVE: LOCATED ____________ FRONTAGE FEET ALONG THE N. S. E. W. (CIRCLE ONE) SIDE OF ______________________________________ (ROAD NAME PROPERTY FRONTS ONTO), WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY _______________________________________ DISTANCE FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH _________________________________________ CROSS STREET. AREA TO BE REZONED: 4. ACRES _________________ (OR) SQ.FT._______________ 5. ZONING AND LAND USE INFORMATION: EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ TRACT# (IF MORE THAN 1) ________ ________ ________ ACRES / SQ. FT. PROPOSED USE PROPOSED ZONING _______________ _______________ _______________ _____________ _____________ _____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ RELATED CURRENT CASES: (YES / NO) 6. ACTIVE ZONING CASE? 7. RESTRICTIVE COVENANT? (YES / NO) (YES / NO) 8. SUBDIVISION? (YES / NO) 9. SITE PLAN? FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ FILE NUMBER: ______________________________________ Adopted December 2012 6 Whitehall Intentional Society, Inc. Whitehall Cooperative787052500 Nueces St. Austin, TXTravis0.2282MF-4-NPResidence0.2282ResidenceMF-4-H-NP City of Austin - Historic Preservation Office Historic Zoning Application Packet PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (SUBDIVISION REFERENCE OR METES AND BOUNDS): 10a. SUBDIVISION REFERENCE: Name: _____________________________________________________________ Block(s) ______________________ Lot(s )___________________ Outlot(s) _____________________ Plat Book: _________________________________Page Number:_________________________________ 10b. METES AND BOUNDS (Attach two copies of certified field notes if subdivision reference is not available or zoning includes partial lots) DEED REFERENCE CONVEYING PROPERTY TO PRESENT OWNER AND TAX PARCEL I.D.: 11. VOLUME:_______________PAGE:______________ TAX PARCEL I.D. NO. _____________________________ OTHER PROVISIONS: 12. IS PROPERTY IN A ZONING COMBINING DISTRICT / OVERLAY ZONE? YES / NO TYPE OF COMBINING DIST/OVERLAY ZONE (NCCD,NP, etc)____________________________________ 13. LOCATED IN A LOCAL OR NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT? YES / NO 14. IS A TIA REQUIRED? YES / NO (NOT REQUIRED IF BASE ZONING IS NOT CHANGING) TRIPS PER DAY:_____________________________ TRAFFIC SERIAL ZONE(S):_________________ ________________ _________________ ________________ OWNERSHIP TYPE: 15. ___SOLE ___COMMUNITY PROPERTY ___PARTNERSHIP ___CORPORATION ____TRUST If ownership is other than sole or community property, list individuals/partners/principals below or attach separate sheet. OWNER INFORMATION: 16. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION SIGNATURE:_______________________________________ NAME: _______________________________________ FIRM NAME:___________________________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER: _____________ STREET ADDRESS: _______________________________________________________________________________ CITY: ______________________________ STATE: _______________ ZIP CODE: ____________________________ EMAIL ADDRESS: ________________________________________________________________________________ AGENT INFORMATION (IF …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 4, 2025 HR-2025-039309 HERITAGE GRANT RECIPIENT: SPRING 2025 HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY – OLD ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 900 CHICON STREET 4.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Replace the wall membrane present at the basement walls to prevent moisture infiltration and water damage. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1. Remove existing membrane 2. Clean, inspect, and repair walls where needed 3. Seal cracks and install new membrane 4. Install drainage protection at building exterior ARCHITECTURE The Old Administration Building is a three-story structure with a partial basement located on the campus of Huston- Tillotson University. It is constructed of masonry units with extruded mortar joints, with the basement clad in plaster. The entire building is painted white and features a covered entry at one corner. There is a large amount of fenestration at all levels, including the basement walls where the surrounding grade slopes downward. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards Historic material is prioritized to be retained, with only sacrificial materials, such as the existing moisture membrane, to be removed. 2. Foundations Basement wall foundation will be repaired to match the existing material. 4. Exterior walls and trim By introducing drainage that will prevent moisture from infiltrating the walls, the exterior material will be at a reduced risk for water-related damage. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consider a French drain or other drainage systems as part of a larger moisture mitigation plan, with an emphasis towards a system that can be cleaned of debris to ensure a long lifespan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve this Spring 2025 Heritage Grant project in concurrence with Architectural Review Committee feedback. LOCATION MAP 4.0 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 4.0 – 3 Grant application, 2025
Backup
HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY AUSTIN, TEXAS Project Applicant Applicant Site Address: 900 Chicon Street, Austin, TX, 78702 email address: Name: Huston-Til cgallion@htu.edu lotson University Old Administration The Historic symbolizing a vital generations, aesthetic piece of this project proposes our shared heritage. targeted authenticity. and historical restoration, Building holds significant cultural and architectural value, To ensure its continued measures for future preservation that address structural restorative integrity, This project of the basement moisture supports the removal floor will undergo and replacement membrane of the basement wall membrane. the structure from continued The outer walls intrusion, ensuring long-term stability replacement to protect and preservation. Phase 1 Remove and Replace Excavate the soil around the basement foundation Slope soil away from the foundation existing membrane Outer Membrane (6 feet) around perimeter-providing enough working to ensure proper drainage space. during and after the work. Remove to expose the outer walls. The excavation down to the Phase 2 Clean and Inspect Walls Clean the walls thoroughly, or manual scrub cleaning with synthetic brush cleaner-water rinse after Inspect the walls for cracks, holes, membrane. debris, or old coating. to ensure a smooth surface. will be repaired All defects or damage. applying removing any dirt, before the Power wash-100 PSI or below Dawn will be used as a Phase 3. Repair Cracks Prime Fill cracks Seal all joints enters or holes in the basement where the foundation through seams or imperfections. and Seal Joints walls using flexible Foundation Sealant meets the wall with a flexible This ensures sealant. that no water Phase 4. Apply Bonding Primer and then Sealant (allow to dry) Apply primer to help liquid adhere to walls. membrane Apply Sealant Phase 5. Install the Waterproof Membrane- liquid and sheet Phase 6. Install Drainage Layer and Protection Phase 7. Backfill After the membrane and drainage system are installed, with Proper Soil backfill area the excavated Additional Needed Gutters Phase 8. Install Supplies and Equipment: Excavation Cleaning Foundation Sealant Power Washer-100 PSI or below equipment debris supplies (Dawn, synthetic brushes, towels) /concrete sealant-flexible sheet-waterproof Membrane Soil Rotten wood replacement Earth compactor Drainage-backflow prevention Damaged gutter replacement 350 ft Double wall culvert Dumpster *All work and materials will meet the Secretar y of Interiors standards.
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS JUNE 4, 2025 DA-2025-055669; HR-2025-057874 HARTHAN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT 600 HARTHAN STREET 5 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a contributing building. ARCHITECTURE The primary and secondary buildings at 600 Harthan Street, constructed ca. 1930, display Spanish Colonial Revival stylistic influences. This is the most recent building in the district and is an excellent example of the evolving design sensibilities of the era. Permit research suggests that three major additions to the two buildings on the lot took place between 1981 and 1984; however, these do not appear to have precluded the building’s inclusion as a contributing structure in the 2008 district nomination. DESIGN STANDARDS The Harthan Street Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: I. EXISTING BUILDINGS A. FAÇADE. 1. Retain the original façade of the house. Do not change the character, appearance, configuration, or materials of the façade, except to restore buildings to their original appearance 2. Do not add architectural features to a house which it never had. B. EXTERIOR WALL MATERIALS 1. Repair damaged exterior wall materials to the greatest extent possible. Replace only those sections which are deteriorated beyond repair. Replace deteriorated wall materials in kind to match existing wall materials. Do not replace wood siding with cementitious fiber board. 2. Do not apply aluminum, vinyl or other synthetic siding as a replacement for a primary building material. 3. Do not paint masonry. C. PORCHES 1. Do not remove any porch or enclose a front porch. 2. Do not add a new porch or deck to the main façade where one never existed. 3. Repair damaged porch elements in kind whenever possible. If replacement is necessary, replace only those elements beyond repair and reproduce the historic elements in the new material. Do not add railings to a porch which never had them. Do not use raw wood or latticework as a railing material. D. ROOFING 1. Use roofing materials which duplicate the original or existing materials whenever possible. Do not replace a composition shingle roof with a metal roof, but explore the possibility of fiberglass shingles with a profile similar to a wood-shake or composition shingle for greater energy efficiency. 2. Maintain the general shape and slope of the existing roof as seen from the street. 3. Maintain existing chimneys. E. WINDOWS AND DOORS 1. Retain …
H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | J U N E 4 , 2 0 2 5 Existing Site Plan A B C A. Two (2) story, four (4) unit apartment building • Built in the 1930s D B. Two (2) story residence • Built in 1920 C. Two (2) story garage apartment • Built post 1984 • HLC approved the demolition of building C in 2017 (LHD-2017-0006) D. Two (2) and three (3) story building • • Two (2) story building was built in the 1930s and designed by the son of Building A who was an MIT student at the time Three (3) story portion of the building was added in 1984 and was designed by Black + Vernooy. Note: The buildings have been vacant for over a decade and mostly unconditioned during this time. The severe neglect of the properties has resulted in suspected water damage, significant exterior damage, and poor structural integrity. Reference expert reports. ORIGINAL STRUCTURES* RENOVATIONS/ADD ONS APPROVED FOR DEMOLITION * Original Structures have undergone significant exterior modifications and no longer resemble the historic structures 600 Harthan Does No Longer has Historical Significance Criteria to be a Contributing Structure: Age and Integrity 1. At least 50 years old 2. Must retain its historical integrity, meaning the building has not been significantly altered in ways that remove or obscure important historic materials or features Buildings A, B, & C Building D 1. At least 50 years old 1. At least 50 years old • Building A: Built in the 1930s (as an addition to the original western • Original Structure: The original structure (northern portion of structure, bldg. B) existing building) was built in the 1930s. • Building B: Built in 1920 (original structure on the former western • Add-On: The southern portion of the structure was constructed in lot) • Building C: Modern construction (built post 1984) 1984, making it nonhistorical. 2. Must retain its historical integrity, meaning the building has not been significantly altered in ways that remove or obscure important historic materials or features • Building A: The building has undergone a series of major renovations in the last 50 years. • Building B: Does not retain historic integrity. Examples include, original wood siding has been covered in stucco, window sizes and …
May 28, 2025 Riverside Resources 1221 S MoPac Expy, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78746 Attention: Mr. Barrett Lepore Subject: REPORT OF FINDINGS Site: 600 Harthan, Austin, Texas Allana, Buick & Bers, Inc. (ABB) is pleased to present this report of our findings regarding the above referenced project in Austin, Texas. The objective of our review is to determine the condition of the original improvements and determine whether the original materials still exist in pace or if they remain in a condition such that they could be restored. We observed the conditions at the property during a site visit on May 22, 2025. The structures at the site appear to have been significantly altered by renovations and additions since the 1930’s. The East Structure buildings are stucco clad wood framed structures. The 1984 Addition has cracks in the stucco and poor detailing that is susceptible to wood rot due to lack of drainage at soffits. The stucco clad walls at the courtyards have significant cracks exposing the wood framing also due to poor drainage. The stucco at the original 600 Harthan house appears to have been modified, resurfaced, and repainted. The original windows from the residential structures appear to have been discarded and replaced. The West Structure buildings have not been maintained over the past 10 years. It is likely that there is concealed wood rot in the framing due to the age of the structure, cracks observed in the stucco, and poor stucco drainage. The wood framed windows show signs of wood rot. Given the major renovations including roof replacements, exterior stucco application/replacement and window size/material changes, it is our conclusion that the original exterior materials that can be refurbished are limited to Building A. The original materials at the remaining structures are mostly missing or are in a condition that would not be refurbished due to their more recent installation. 835 W 6th St., Suite 1410, Austin, TX 78701 Riverside Resources May 28, 2025 Page 2 The following summarizes our observations. West Structure Building A – Two Story Multi-Family Structure • Stucco: Likely original materials. • Windows: Likely original materials. • Roofing: Unknown. • Integrity for restoration: The stucco will require extensive repairs due to concealed wood rot. The windows could be repaired and refurbished. The roofing cannot be refurbished. Building B - 1920’s Victorian – • Stucco: Retrofit over original siding. • Windows: Not original windows. • Roofing: …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum, Meghan Yancy May 13, 2025 Subject: OWANA Position on Proposed Demolition at 600 Harthan Street - 2025-055669 DA Dear Chair Heimsath and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee and Steering Committee have voted not to oppose the proposed demolition of the structure located at 600 Harthan Street. The building has remained vacant and in a state of neglect for over a decade, presenting significant challenges to preservation efforts. The Zoning Committee met with representatives from Riverside Resources to review early plans for the redevelopment of the site, envisioned as part of the overall concept for 1214 W 6th Street. The concept presented envisions a continuation of small-scale shops and offices along the north side of West 6th Street, designed to complement the Sixth & Blanco project now under construction. The proposed development is intended to reflect appropriate scale and massing in accordance with the design guidelines of the Harthan Local Historic District (LHD), and to ensure compatibility with the character of both the Harthan and Castle Hill Local Historic Districts. The project aspires to create a vibrant, pedestrian-oriented space where residents and visitors can shop, dine, and engage with the community. Given the long-term condition of the property and the thoughtful nature of the proposed redevelopment, OWANA believes it is appropriate to defer to the judgment of the Historic Landmark Commission in this matter. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Steering Committee Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 4, 2025 DA-2025-055682; GF-2025-059297 1212-1214 W. 6TH STREET WEST LINE NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 6 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1951 commercial building along with ca. 1968 and 1973 rear additions. ARCHITECTURE The front portion of the building, built in 1951, is a one- and two-part commercial block with a flat roof and dramatic horizontals that complement its Mid-century Modern design. It is clad in brick and stucco and features fixed metal windows and a dramatic wing wall at the street elevation. The rear shop addition at the rear-east side of the lot was constructed between 1962 and 1968, and a second floor was added around 1973. Though the automobile bay doors have been filled in with fixed windows, they still evoke the building’s original use as an auto shop. RESEARCH The structure at 1212-1214 W. 6th Street is a connected complex of several buildings associated with the Goad, Maund, and McMorris auto dealerships during the site’s period of significance. The first commercial structure on the site was a large showroom and service center for the Goad Motor Company, who sold Cadillacs and Oldsmobiles, in 1951. West 5th and 6th Streets, from the 1920s onward, earned the name “Automobile Row” as service stations and dealerships replaced earlier industrial and residential structures along Downtown’s east-west corridors. According to author Daniel Strohl, the Goad Motor Company remained in business continuously from the 1920s through the 1990s, though operations and facilities were spread throughout Texas. T. J. Goad moved his dealership from Breckenridge to San Antonio in the 1920s and remained there until 1949, when he moved the business to the intersection of 2nd and Guadalupe in Austin.1 After commissioning an expansive new facility on the west side, Goad Motor Company opened for business in August of 1951. A large service staff ensured that customers would return frequently for tune-ups. By 1957, Charles Maund Oldsmobile-Cadillac had purchased the property. According to the draft Downtown Austin Historic Resource Survey, “Maund owned the [dealership] from 1957 to 1994. Charles Maund started buying and selling used cars at the age of 19 in Port Arthur before moving to Austin and opening his first dealership at the age of 30 at 1214 W. 6th St. Over the next couple of decades, Charles Maund expanded his business to include multiple dealerships across Texas. According to his obituary, …
H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N | J U N E 4 , 2 0 2 5 Site Overview Original Structure built in 1951 Modern Addition built circa 1995 1214 W 6th Street Does not Have Historical Integrity as Features have been Removed through Exterior Modifications Criteria to be a Contributing Structure: Age and Integrity 1. At least 50 years old 2. Must retain its historical integrity, meaning the building has not been significantly altered in ways that remove or obscure important historic materials or features Original Structure Eastern Addition 1. At least 50 years old • Built circa 1951 2. Must retain its historical integrity, meaning the building has not been significantly altered in ways that remove or obscure important historic materials or features • The building has been significantly altered in ways that remove or obscure historic features. Examples include: • Original garage doors have been removed and replaced with modern windows. Service entrances have been replaced with modern windows. Exterior doors have been altered. • • • Original showcase windows fronting 6th have been removed. • Brick features have been removed. 1. At least 50 years old • The structure is approximately 30 years old; therefore, the addition is not historic. • Built circa 1995 2. Must retain its historical integrity, meaning the building has not been significantly altered in ways that remove or obscure important historic materials or features • Modern building which has no historical integrity. 1214 W 6th Street Lacks Historical Significance Criteria to be a Contributing Structure: Historical Significance 1. Association with events that have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of history 2. Association with persons significant in history 3. Architectural merit, such as being a representative example of a style, method of construction, or work of a master 4. Potential to yield important information in history or prehistory Original Structure Eastern Addition 1. Association with events that have made a significant contribution to broad 1. Association with events that have made a significant contribution to patterns of history • No, in HDP-2018-0496 regarding the former Goad Motor Company broad patterns of history • No dealership at 307 W 5th Street, Staff concluded that “the building was a car dealership for most of its existence in the historic period; there do …
Steering Committee Members: Stephen L. Amos, Chair Renae Alsobrook, Mark Ashby, Evelyn Fujimoto, Adrienne Goldsberry, Paula Hern, Nick Mehl, William Osborn, Charlie Rice, Paul Shattuck, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum, Meghan Yancy May 13, 2025 Subject: Support for Demolition of 1214 W 6th Street - 2025-055682 DA Dear Chair Heimsath and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) Zoning Committee and Steering Committee have voted to support the proposed demolition of the structure at 1214 W 6th Street. The Zoning Committee met with representatives from Riverside Resources to review future plans for the redevelopment of the site, currently home to West Side Village. The concept presented envisions a thoughtful continuation of small-scale shops and offices along the north side of West 6th Street, complementing the Sixth & Blanco project currently under construction. The proposed development is intended to reflect a scale and massing that is compatible with the surrounding Harthan and Castle Hill Local Historic Districts. It aims to create a vibrant, pedestrian-friendly space where the community can shop, dine, and connect. We respectfully urge the Commission to support the demolition request for 1214 W 6th Street in light of these plans and the broader vision for the corridor. Sincerely, Stephen L. Amos Steering Committee Chair Old West Austin Neighborhood Association
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JUNE 4, 2025 PR-2025-029950; GF-2025-033059; HR-2025-056344 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 1703 ALAMEDA DRIVE 7.0 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1939 house and construct a residence. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Demolish the existing one-story house, which contributes to the National Register district. Construct a two-story house in generally the same location on the lot. ARCHITECTURE Built in a simple, minimal traditional form, the house at 1703 Alameda Drive is set at grade slightly above the street and is rectangular in plan with a small front porch cutout at one corner. The exterior is clad in horizontal wood siding, and original screen are present at the four front windows, along with a screen door at the rear of the porch for the main entry. There is minimal overhang from the hipped roof, which is clad in composition shingle. The house features numerous windows on all sides, typically paired or arranged in three units, side-by-side. A pier-and-beam foundation supports the one-story structure. The house is in good condition and has seen minimal alterations since construction. RESEARCH After construction around 1939, the house was first owned by Hiram & Doris Brown, who worked at local businesses such as Texas Cleaners & Shoe Repair. The Browns owned the property through World War II, and shortly after was sold to Charles & Bertha Kinney. Charles Kinney worked as a salesman and Bertha worked for many years as a clerk at the Internal Revenue Service. For a time, their adult son lived with them while attending the University of Texas. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location Proposed construction is generally on the same footprint as the existing house and matches setback to other houses on the street. 2. Orientation The proposed residence is oriented towards the street, like the existing house and neighbors on the same street. 3. Scale, massing, and height Generally, the neighbors on the same street have single-story houses or, if there is a second floor, it is setback from the front or visually hidden by a side-gabled roof. There is no setback in this design, nor does the plan call for breaking up the height …
(cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:13)(cid:16) (cid:2)(cid:16) (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:7) (cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:2)(cid:7)(cid:8) (cid:1)(cid:8) (cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:13)(cid:16) (cid:1)(cid:16) (cid:12)(cid:36) (cid:1) (cid:40)(cid:41)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:5) (cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:1) (cid:5)(cid:7) (cid:24)(cid:1)(cid:7) (cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:6)(cid:14)(cid:47) (cid:43)(cid:21)(cid:24)(cid:2) (cid:2) (cid:23)(cid:10)(cid:47)(cid:29)(cid:44)(cid:3) (cid:5)(cid:7) (cid:24)(cid:1)(cid:7) (cid:1)(cid:44)(cid:5) (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:7) (cid:73)(cid:1)(cid:105)(cid:107) (cid:37)(cid:34)(cid:36)(cid:107) (cid:75)(cid:69)(cid:71)(cid:78)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:102)(cid:107) (cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:9)(cid:13) (cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:13) (cid:8)(cid:10)(cid:2)(cid:13) (cid:7)(cid:11)(cid:13) (cid:37)(cid:34)(cid:34)(cid:107) (cid:37)(cid:34)(cid:32)(cid:107) (cid:69)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:107) (cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:83)(cid:107) (cid:30)(cid:34)(cid:20)(cid:38)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:13)(cid:107) (cid:5)(cid:6) (cid:33)(cid:39)(cid:21)(cid:33)(cid:5)(cid:107) (cid:6)(cid:49)(cid:12)(cid:107) (cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:16) (cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:15) (cid:51)(cid:107) (cid:62)(cid:107) (cid:14)(cid:10)(cid:10)(cid:4)(cid:16) (cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:8)(cid:5) (cid:62)(cid:107) (cid:30)(cid:24)(cid:36)(cid:7)(cid:107) (cid:8)(cid:49)(cid:12)(cid:107) (cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:30)(cid:25)(cid:36)(cid:9)(cid:107) (cid:10)(cid:58)(cid:3)(cid:17) (cid:38)(cid:34)(cid:37)(cid:47) (cid:25)(cid:47) (cid:99)(cid:99)(cid:107) (cid:90)(cid:61)(cid:107) (cid:26)(cid:107) (cid:66)(cid:107) (cid:104)(cid:107) (cid:91) (cid:45)(cid:47) (cid:44) (cid:91) (cid:39) (cid:4)(cid:6) (cid:4)(cid:6) (cid:67)(cid:107) (cid:68)(cid:107) (cid:1)(cid:6) (cid:46) (cid:62)(cid:107) (cid:50)(cid:52)(cid:107) (cid:62)(cid:107) (cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:51) (cid:58)(cid:3)(cid:17) (cid:1)(cid:3) (cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:50)(cid:52)(cid:107) (cid:59)(cid:4)(cid:18) (cid:2) (cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:1)(cid:5) (cid:2)(cid:5) (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:7) (cid:100)(cid:107) (cid:103)(cid:107) (cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:31) (cid:28) (cid:63)(cid:107) (cid:62) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:103) (cid:43) (cid:42)(cid:107) (cid:89)(cid:93) (cid:29)(cid:107) (cid:89)(cid:94) (cid:84)(cid:107) (cid:106)(cid:107) (cid:27)(cid:107) (cid:100)(cid:107) (cid:100)(cid:107) (cid:64)(cid:107) (cid:82)(cid:107) (cid:45)(cid:107) (cid:7)(cid:10)(cid:13)(cid:16) (cid:3)(cid:16) (cid:35)(cid:14)(cid:107) (cid:54)(cid:48)(cid:107) (cid:88)(cid:107) (cid:65)(cid:56)(cid:107) (cid:12) (cid:1)(cid:2) (cid:96)(cid:107) (cid:101)(cid:107) (cid:53)(cid:80)(cid:107) (cid:55)(cid:57)(cid:107) (cid:55)(cid:15)(cid:107) (cid:47)(cid:81)(cid:107) (cid:31)(cid:16) (cid:95)(cid:107) (cid:45)(cid:107) (cid:64)(cid:107) (cid:60)(cid:19) (cid:33)(cid:22)(cid:26)(cid:2)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:7)(cid:47)(cid:30)(cid:42)(cid:1)(cid:32)(cid:47) (cid:24)(cid:26)(cid:16) (cid:2)(cid:28)(cid:5) (cid:6)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:8)(cid:22)(cid:24)(cid:4)(cid:32)(cid:47) (cid:24)(cid:26)(cid:15) (cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:14) (cid:12)(cid:33) (cid:1) (cid:40) (cid:22)(cid:107)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:75)(cid:83)(cid:69)(cid:87)(cid:78)(cid:107) (cid:92)(cid:87)(cid:77)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:107) (cid:86)(cid:85)(cid:107) (cid:71)(cid:97)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:107) (cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:98)(cid:23)(cid:46)(cid:37)(cid:32)(cid:30)(cid:23)(cid:107)(cid:41)(cid:40)(cid:11)(cid:107) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:2)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:15) (cid:5)(cid:15)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:12)(cid:10)(cid:9)(cid:8)(cid:15) (cid:6)(cid:13)(cid:11)(cid:14)(cid:10) (cid:13)(cid:47)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:9)(cid:47) (cid:35)(cid:16) (cid:4) (cid:17) (cid:5) (cid:18)(cid:14)(cid:47)
SITE NOTES EROSION CONTROL 1. The contractor shall install erosion/sedimentation controls and tree/natural area protective fencing prior to any site preparation work (clearing, grubbing or excavation). 2. The contractor is required to inspect the controls and fences at weekly intervals and after significant rainfall events to insure that they are functioning properly. The person(s) responsible for maintenance of controls and fences shall immediately make any necessary repairs to damaged areas. Silt accumulation at controls must be removed when the depth reaches six (6) inches. TREE PROTECTION 1. All trees and natural areas shown on plan to be preserved shall be protected during construction with temporary fencing. 2. Protective fences shall be erected according to City of Austin Standards for Tree Protection. 3. Protective fences shall be installed prior to the start of any site preparation work (clearing, grubbing or grading), and shall be maintained throughout all phases of the construction project. 4. Erosion and sedimentation control barriers shall be installed or maintained in a manner which does not result in soil build-up within tree drip lines. 5. Protective fences shall surround the trees or group of trees, and will be located at the outermost limit of branches (drip line) , for natural areas, protective fences shall follow the Limit of Construction line, in order to prevent the following: A. Soil compaction in the root zone area resulting from vehicular traffic or storage of equipment or materials; B. Root zone disturbances due to grade changes (greater than 6 inches cut or fill), or trenching not reviewed and authorized by the City Aborist; C. Wounds to exposed roots, trunk or limbs by mechanical equipment; D. Other activities detrimental to trees such as chemical storage, cement truck cleaning, and fires. E P O L S 2 1 : 6 2 1 : 6 E P O L S E P O L S 2 1 : 6 6:12 SLOPE 6:12 SLOPE 2 1 : 6 E P O L S E P O L S 6:12 SLOPE 6:12 SLOPE E P O L S 2 1 : 2 2 1 : 6 2 1 : 6 E P O L S E P O L S 1 3/32"=1'-0" TPP AND ROOF PLAN Scale: North Arrow VISITABLE EXTERIOR ROUTE 1:12 SLOPE = 8.3% VISITABLE ENTRANCE SURFACE SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM, AND SLIP RESISTANT. PAVERS USED AS AN EXTERIOR VISITABLE ROUTE SHALL BE LEVEL WITH …
Dear Historic Committee Representatives, disease to us. Family. Plain and simple. along with dementia. a designated As we get older and our two boys are growing important older and living Parkinson's disease able to provide them to stay in Austin, Where they wouldn't feel "in the way" (their When the opportunity 14lk to her about the vision and excited house that will add quality by. to see us expand with family. out of town, which makes traveling tough. years ago, and is currently eleven Both sets of in laws, our loving and is up, we are learning what truly matters parents, with mom was diagnosed from the side effects with intense dream; that one day we would be that was safe and comfortable dealing we had a wonderful Something are getting Sydney's for But recently space for our parents. with their grandkids, for extended words) came up to speak with Joyce, but could come and go as they please. the previous owner of 1703 Alameda, and periods of time. An in laws suite. for our home, she was not only interested in selling to us but eager Ultimately , we want to create a cohesive and beautiful to our neighborhood, something our neighbors would be proud to live Thank You, ' ' �;;;:; and Lior and Oliver Talpaz) � Current owners of 1705 Alameda Drive and 1703 Alameda Drive May 26, 2025
P U B L I C H E A R I N G I N F O R M A T I O N Although applicants and/or their agents) are expected to attend a public hearing, you are not required to attend. However, if you do attend, you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person withstanding to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: ? delivering a written statement to the board or commission before the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or ? appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: ? occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development. ? is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or ? is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development? A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal form may be available from the responsible department. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our website: www.austintexas.gov/abc Written comments must be submitted to the board or commission (or the contact person listed on the notice) before a public hearing. Your …
Brian Randall From: Sent: To: Subject: Saved. Thanks Brian Randall Monday, May 5, 2025 2:20 PM Sydney Schatz RE: 1703 From: Sydney Schatz < Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 5:21 PM To: Brian Randall < Subject: Fwd: 1703 > Just received from another neighbor. --- Sydney E. Schatz ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: JANET WEAVER Date: Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:10 PM Subject: 1703 To: < We are fine with house demolition. Good luck with project. Jan and Bob 1702 Sent from my iPhone 1