Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for August 7, 2024 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Historic zoning applications Historic landmark and historic district applications 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 1500 W 24th Street – Owner-initiated historic zoning. 1403 W 10th Street – Owner-initiated historic zoning. 3311 Lafayette Avenue – Owner-initiated historic zoning. 1500 E 12th Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to September 4, 2024) 900 Spence Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to September 4, 2024) 801 Lydia Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – Total demolition. 1807 E Cesar Chavez Street – Berner-Clark-Mercado House – Repair and replace deck and rails, paint exterior. 2305 E 21st Street – Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Local Historic District – New construction accessory dwelling unit. 203 W 32nd Street – Aldridge Place Local Historic District – Replace garage door with windows. 1607 W 10th Street – Mary Baylor House – Addition. 4107 Speedway – Hyde Park Local Historic District – Additions. 2900 Tarry Trail – Gatewood House – Addition, new doors and windows, new siding. 1011 E 9th Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – Remodel, repair, repaint. National Register district permit applications 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 1409 Alta Vista Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 600 Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register Historic District – Sign. 600 Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register Historic District – Second sign. 4200 Wilshire Parkway – Wilshire Wood National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 4200 Wilshire Parkway – Wilshire Wood National Register Historic District – New construction. 1607 Kenwood Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Addition. 1519 Alameda Drive – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District …
Historic Landmark Commission Applications under Review for August 7, 2024 Meeting This list does not constitute a formal agenda and is subject to change. A final agenda will be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. Historic zoning applications 1500 W 24th Street – Owner-initiated historic zoning. 1403 W 10th Street – Owner-initiated historic zoning. 3311 Lafayette Avenue – Owner-initiated historic zoning. 1500 E 12th Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning. 900 Spence Street – Commission-initiated historic zoning. 9037 Butler Hike and Bike Trail – Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to September 4, 2024) 1300 Springdale Road – Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed to September 4, 2024) Historic landmark and historic district applications 801 Lydia Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – Total demolition. 1807 E Cesar Chavez Street – Berner-Clark-Mercado House – Repair and replace deck and rails, paint exterior. 2305 E 21st Street – Rogers-Washington-Holy Cross Local Historic District – New construction accessory dwelling unit. 203 W 32nd Street – Aldridge Place Local Historic District – Replace garage door with windows. 1607 W 10th Street – Mary Baylor House – Addition. 4107 Speedway – Hyde Park Local Historic District – Additions. 2900 Tarry Trail – Gatewood House – Addition, new doors and windows, new siding. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 1011 E 9th Street – Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District – Remodel, repair, repaint. National Register district permit applications 1409 Alta Vista Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 600 Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register Historic District – Sign. 600 Congress Avenue – Congress Avenue National Register Historic District – Second sign. 4200 Wilshire Parkway – Wilshire Wood National Register Historic District – Total demolition. 4200 Wilshire Parkway – Wilshire Wood National Register Historic District – New construction. 1607 Kenwood Avenue – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – Addition. 1519 Alameda Drive – Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District – …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2024-0094 HLC DATE: August 7, 2024 PC DATE: CC Date: APPLICANT: Suzanne Bryant & Sarah Goodfriend (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Brooks House WATERSHED: Shoal Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1500 W. 24th St. ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic combining district (SF-3-NP-H) zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Austin Lukes, 512-978-0766 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Central West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Pemberton Heights Neighborhood Association, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Historic Muny District, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, West Austin Neighborhood Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The Old West Austin National Register district nomination lists the property as noncontributing. However, this is due to the property not being 50 years old as of 2003, the year in which the district was certified. If the district were to be re-surveyed, the property would be considered as contributing for the same qualifications outlined in this document. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The Brooks House, located at 1500 W. 24th St., was constructed in 1964 in the Contemporary style, overlooking Shoal Creek. It is set back from the intersection of W. 24th St. and Pemberton Pkwy. at the corner of the property with the highest elevation to take advantage of the lot’s viewshed. With the surrounding vegetation, this largely obscures the building from the rights-of-way. The 2-story residence features a “Hawaiian” or “Dickey” double pitched roof that was considered high style at the time of construction. A curving parkway opens up to …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: C14H-2024-0098 HLC DATE: August 7, 2024 PC DATE: CC Date: APPLICANT: Mark J. Stine & Clemmie S. Cummins (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Maufrais House WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1403 W. 10th St. ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Austin Lukes, 512-978-0766 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, Old West Austin Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Save Historic Muny District, Shoal Creek Conservancy, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The Maufrais House is an excellent example of the Craftsman bungalow style, featuring an ample front gable projecting over the front porch with a moderately-pitched hipped roof covering the main space of the house. Original windows and screens are present on all sides of the house, and are in good condition. A rear porch addition is located along the Maufrais Street elevation. The front porch wood rail and column details, though relatively simple in design as is common in houses of this style, remain present and are in good condition. The interior floorplan, which originally was laid out as a central hall with rooms accessed on either side, has seen only slight modification, which occurred when the porch was constructed. Overall, the condition of the property is excellent, little alteration has occurred (the majority of which was completed during the period of significance for the district), and the building …
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum August 1, 2024 RE: 1403 W. 10th Street - Maufrais House Dear Chair Heimsath and Historic Landmark Commissioners, OWANA enthusiastically supports the re-zoning application of Maufrais House for historic designation. It is a delightful example of Bungalow architecture with a rich family legacy history. Sincerely, Christopher Hurst, AIA OWANA Steering Committee Chair
CASE NUMBER: C14H-2024-0100 HLC DATE: August 7, 2024 PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET APPLICANT: Steve Wilson (owner-initiated) HISTORIC NAME: Splawn-Green House WATERSHED: Boggy Creek ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-NP-H COUNCIL DISTRICT: 9 ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 3311 Lafayette Avenue STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic landmark (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Cherrywood Neighborhood Assn., Del Valle Community Coalition, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Upper Boggy Creek Neighborhood Planning Team DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2020 North Loop-Hancock-Boggy Creek Historic Resource Survey lists the property as a medium priority for preservation. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The property at 3311 Lafayette Avenue is a good example of a vernacular building type showcasing the transition between more formal stylistic choices of the nineteenth century to the unique Austin interpretation of the National Folk and Craftsman bungalows of the early twentieth century. Furthermore, the house’s twin—now located on East 46th Street—has already been recognized for its architectural significance; the house at 3311 Lafayette Avenue remains markedly more intact. “Architecturally,” remarks author Steve Wilson in his home’s historic zoning application, “this house is a distinctive and well-preserved missing link in the development of the bungalow style in Austin. It’s an invaluable key to understanding how the form supplanted the traditional Victorian in the city. The home’s unique historical association with an existing landmark, the Pearce-Anderson House, furthers that understanding.”1 The historic zoning application describes the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, August 7th, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair Witt Featherston, Vice Chair Kevin Koch Carl Larosche Trey McWhorter Harmony Grogan Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 3, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS/DISCUSSION AND ACTION Historic Zoning Applications 2. C14H-2024-0094 – 1500 W 24th St. Council District 10 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Lori Martin City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Grant the proposed zoning change from family residence- neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic combining district (SF-3-NP-H) zoning. 3. C14H-2024-0098 – 1403 W 10th St. Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Lori Martin City Staff: Austin Lukes, Historic Preservation Office, 512-978-0766 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. 4. C14H-2024-0100 – 3311 Lafayette Ave. Council District 9 Proposal: Owner-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Steve Wilson City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF-3-NP) to family residence-neighborhood plan-historic landmark (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. 5. PR-2024-064274 – 1500 E 12th St. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Nicholas Sandlin City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Recommend historic zoning to Planning Commission and City Council. Otherwise, require a City of Austin Documentation Package before releasing the demolition permit. 6. PR-2024-026690 – 900 Spence St. Council District 3 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Katherine Warren City Staff: …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, July 3rd, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Boards and Commissions Room 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch ab Carl Larosche ab Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x x x ab x x Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Bonnie Orr spoke on 409 E Monroe. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 5, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner McWhorter. Commissioner Grogan seconded the motion. Vote: 8-0. The motion passed. BRIEFINGS 2. Briefing on community outreach and engagement for the Equity-Based Preservation Plan Presenter: Cara Bertron and Gregory Farrar CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Landmark and Local Historic District Applications 3. PR-2024-014961 – 801 Lydia St. Robertson/Stuart & Mair Local Historic District Council District 1 Proposal: Total demolition. (Postponed June 5, 2024) Applicant: Jennifer Hanlen City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Deny the demolition request. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to August 7, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner McWhorter. Commissioner Grogan seconded the motion. Vote: 8-0. The motion passed. 4. HR-2024-040291– 1807 E Cesar Chavez St. Berner-Clark-Mercado House Council District 3 Proposal: Repair/replace deck and rails, paint exterior. (Postponed June 5, 2024) Applicant: David Rudick City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s request to postpone the public hearing to August 7, 2024 to allow time to implement Committee feedback. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to August 7, 2024, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-077497 ROGERS-WASHINGTON-HOLY CROSS HISTORIC DISTRICT 2305 EAST 21ST STREET 11 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an accessory dwelling unit. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed project is to construct and ADU adjacent to the historic home facing East 21st Street, offset roughly 10 feet from the side of the house. The front of the new construction is to be nearly flush with the historic and is two stories in height. Materials are proposed to match the original home, and the roof is similar is pitch and form. The fenestration pattern is mostly regular on the front, along with a glazed entryway door. At the sides and rear, this is not the case, and windows are placed according to the interior floor plan. DESIGN STANDARDS The Rogers Washington Holy Cross Historic District Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 2.0 Lot Configuration 2.3: Preserve existing single-family development patterns by constructing one principal house-scaled building on each platted lot. Accessory dwelling units are permitted. The property remains one lot, with the ADU not being removed from the plat. 3.0 Site and Site Elements 3.1 Sidewalks/Walkways: Many of the block faces have walkways to the front of the houses. These walkways are typically simple and perpendicular to the street. Proposed access to the ADU front entry is a walkway aligned perpendicularly to the street and not wider than is needed. 8.0 New Construction of Infill (Principal Buildings and Accessory Dwelling Units) 8.1 Orientation, Setbacks, and Height The new construction has a setback almost matching with the original house and conforms to other houses in the district. The height of the two-story ADU is 23 feet above grade at the peak of the roof. Though there is a slight slope to the entire lot, the average height above grade is below the 27 feet limit that new construction is not to exceed. The section of the lot that contains the ADU footprint is generally flatter than other sections of the lot, and this is to be retained and the lot not significantly re-graded. Neighboring houses within the district are all one-story, which the proposed ADU exceeds, though it is not necessarily incompatible. 8.2 Design and Style Though two stories in height, the proposed ADU matches the nearby contributing buildings in floor height and …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-075431 ALDRIDGE PLACE HISTORIC DISTRICT 203 WEST 32ND STREET 12 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Convert garage to conditioned space and replace garage door with salvaged window. 1) Convert lower-level garage to an office/guest room, retaining the existing building footprint. 2) Remove garage door at historic location and replace it with a metal casement window, matching other windows on the front façade in style and salvaged from the neighborhood. The proposed window dates from the period of significance. Infill the surrounding opening that remains from the garage door to match the surrounding wall. 3) ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS One-story ca. 1940 cottage with hipped roof and projecting front porch. The front façade is clad in rectilinear stone with two large metal casement window assemblies. A garage is present below the main floor at the lowest end of the property. This floor is clad in stucco. The Aldridge Place Preservation Plan and Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 5.2. Preservation and Restoration of Contributing Structures 5.2.1: Front of Houses: Retain the historic character of a house in terms of door and window placement and exterior wall materials. Repair damaged or deteriorated exterior wall materials where reasonably possible. If replacement of exterior wall materials is necessary, choose a material identical/similar in size, profile, and appearance as the historic material. The proposal replaces the garage door with a window in the same location. The infill proposed to supplement the difference in opening size matches the surrounding wall. 5.2.3: Windows and Screens: If replacing windows or screens, use windows and screens that match the scale, profile, appearance, and configuration of existing historic windows. Aluminum-clad wood windows generally are appropriate for historic districts, but vinyl and aluminum windows or windows with interior vinyl pane dividers are not appropriate. Proposed infill window has been salvaged from within the historic district, from the same or similar manufacturer that created the two windows on the main floor of this property. 5.3. General Standards for Additions and Changes to Contributing Structures 5.3.2: General: Place any additions or reconstructions to fronts of houses in a manner that is consistent with the existing structure. The proposed infill retains the driveway that presently terminates at the garage. By placing an addition to conditioned space within the building footprint, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-077986; PR-2024-078046 MARY BAYLOR HOUSE 1607 WEST 10TH STREET 13 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS read as an addition. ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Construct a rear addition. Increase the footprint of the current house to include two new bedrooms and one bathroom. Extend the roof back and create a second side-gabled roof at rear. 1) Demo rear wall cladding and rear stair. Remove much of the rear half of the side-gabled roof of the original structure. 2) Construct new addition containing two bedrooms and one bathroom at the rear of the property, using the current hall as a connecting space. The new addition features a side entry at the east of the property. Addition maintains current roof height and pitch so as not to increase the height of the building. 3) Generally match historic materials in composition, but keep then visually distinct to allow the new construction to be Modest one-story cottage with small front porch with two front entry doors. A modestly pitched side-gable roof is present, with a smaller front gable forming the roof over the porch. Windows are 4-over-4 wood units and walls are clad in narrow horizontal wood lap. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks and in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential additions 1. Location The addition is located directly behind the historic house, and it is the same width as the historic building. The connection between the two sections is through an already present opening, which is currently a circulation space in the original section. 2. Scale, massing, and height Due to the small size of the original house, the addition would almost double the square footage and footprint of the residence. The extension of the house would alter the appearance from the street for similar size reasons. However, the location and size of the addition is in the least noticeable location. The roof peak would match the original in height, though the walls all rise slightly higher and call for additional, horizontal windows above anything present on the original house. 3. Design and style The design is simple, like the historic, and does not create a false sense of history or a departure …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-082296 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4107 SPEEDWAY 14 – 1 Conversion of a rear porch to conditioned space and addition of a two-story rear addition with covered porch. PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS 1) Enclose rear screened porch and convert to a bedroom. 2) Construct new two-story addition at southern rear corner, with the first floor being a screened porch and additional bedroom above. Addition would have a front-gabled roof. 3) Construct new one-story addition at south side of property to enlarge family room and house stairway to access second- floor addition. The proposed roof extends up the stair to terminate at the new front gable of the second-floor addition. One-story craftsman bungalow with ample front porch and cross gabled roof. Porch has two wood corner supports and three large windows on the front elevation. Siding is narrow lapped wood on all sides. The south side of the lot features a driveway with a gate to the rear of the property. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1. General Standards 1.3: Avoidance of False Historicism Current design calls for installing a wood bracket at the gable peak at the second-floor addition, which faces the street. Though minor, this may create confusion and a false sense of history about the era of construction of the addition. 3. Residential Standards: Single Family and Contributing Multifamily - Preservation and Restoration 3.5: Roofs The original single-story cross-gabled roof is proposed to be retained in pitch and material. The two-story addition calls for a front-gabled assembly of matching pitch at a higher height to accommodate the second floor. This additional height will be visible from the street, though it is set back over 50 feet from the front of the property and over two-thirds of the building footprint. 4. Residential Standards: Additions to Contributing Single Family and Multi-Family Structures 4.2: Location The proposed two-story addition is set at the rear of the house. The stairway addition is set to the side at the rear half of the house. 4.4. Size and Scale of Additions While the addition is proposed to be taller in height than the original house, and will be visible from the street, it is set at the rear half of the house footprint. …
I G N T S X E I S P E T S E T E R C N O C LOW GRADE POINT: 618.5' GAS METER AREA OF EXISTING FRONT PORCH D R A Y T N O R F ' 5 2 I G N D L U B I I E N L K C A B T E S EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING CONCRETE WALK PROPOSED TEMPORARY LOCATION OF PORTABLE TOILET PROPOSED TEMPORARY LOCATION OF DUMPSTER I K L A W E D S E T E R C N O C G N T S X E I I Y T R E P O R P T N O R F ' . 0 0 5 : E N L I Y A W D E E P S WATER METER EXISTING CONCRETE CURB-CUT CONCRETE PUMP OR LINE PUMP NOTES: Concrete line pump: Wrap connections of concrete line pump with plastic to prevent concrete slurry from leaching into ground and near roots of trees. Concrete truck: If heavy equipment of any kind will be rolling over any area of the full CRZ of protected trees, provide 3/4" plywood over 2x4 lumber over 12″ layer of mulch to bridge over the roots and prevent soil/root compaction. After construction is completed, spread mulch around site to leave a max layer of 3″ within root zones. 618.25' 22.5" PECAN TREE 5'-7 1/2" 11'-3" QUARTER CRITICAL ROOT ZONE HALF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 19'-6 1/2" FRONT BUILDING LINE 40'-0" TENT 1 40'-0" TENT 2 30'-4 7/8" TENT 3 TENT 1 HIGH POINT: 618.75' SIDE PROPERTY LINE: 129.95' HVAC PAD HVAC PAD AREA OF NEW CONDITIONED, SINGLE STORY ADDITION TENT 2 HIGH POINT: 619.0' TENT 3 HIGH POINT: 619.25' 5' SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK LINE HIGH GRADE POINT: 619.0' 33" PECAN TREE I I G N D L U B D R A Y R A E R ' 0 1 I E N L K C A B T E S NEW UNCOVERED SLATTED WOOD DECK LANDING & STEPS REMODELED SCREEN PORCH TO CONDITIONED AREA AREA OF EXISTING PIER & BEAM, SINGLE STORY HOUSE 1st FLOOR: 621.4' 2nd FLOOR.: 631.5' AVERAGE NATURAL GRADE OF STRUCTURE: 618.75' BUILDING HEIGHT: 24'-6" EXISTING ELECTRICAL DROP & METER TO BE REMOVED NEW SCREEN PORCH & SECOND STORY ADDITION E N O Z T O O R L A C T R C L …
Alex Cahue Construction 4107 Speedway Quote #: YNRMEC8 A Proposal for Window and Door Products prepared for: Job Site: 78751 Shipping Address: BFS-AUSTIN/HILL COUNTRY 902 TRADESMENS PARK LOOP HUTTO, TX 78634 Featuring products from: DOUG MARTIN BFS-AUSTIN/HILL COUNTRY 2106 DENTON DR AUSTIN, TX 78758-4506 Email: douglas.martin@bldr.com This report was generated on 6/11/2024 2:38:55 PM using the Marvin Order Management System, version 0004.08.01 (Current). Price in USD. Unit availability and price are subject to change. Dealer terms and conditions may apply. OMS Ver. 0004.08.01 (Current) Product availability and pricing subject to change. Alex Cahue Construction 4107 Speedway Quote Number: YNRMEC8 UNIT SUMMARY The following is a schedule of the windows and doors for this project. For additional unit details, please see Line Item Quotes. Additional charges, tax or Terms and Conditions may apply. Detail pricing is per unit. NUMBER OF LINES: 16 LINE EXT NET PRICE: USD 35,394.63 TOTAL UNIT QTY: 28 PRODUCT LINE MARK UNIT NET PRICE ITEM QTY 1 B Entry East Elevate 2,510.99 EXTENDED NET PRICE 2,510.99 2 E Entry East, South Elevate 1,038.93 2,077.86 Outswing French Door CN 2668 RO 31 5/16" X 82 1/2" Entered as CN 2668 Double Hung CN 3264 RO 32 1/2" X 64 1/4" Entered as CN 3264 Direct Glaze Rectangle RO 33" X 35 5/8" Entered as RO 33" X 35 5/8" Double Hung CN 3272 RO 32 1/2" X 72 1/4" Entered as CN 3272 Double Hung CN 3272 RO 32 1/2" X 72 1/4" Entered as CN 3272 Outswing French Door CN 6068 RO 72" X 82 1/2" Entered as CN 6068 Double Hung CN 3272 RO 32 1/2" X 72 1/4" Entered as CN 3272 Outswing French Door CN 6068 RO 72" X 82 1/2" Entered as CN 6068 Double Hung CN 3672 RO 36 1/2" X 72 1/4" Entered as CN 3672 Awning CN 4026 RO 48" X 30" Entered as CN 4026 Direct Glaze Rectangle 3 F Stairs North Elevate 907.44 907.44 4 D Family Room North, West Elevate 875.18 1,750.36 5 D Family West Elevate 1,132.49 2,264.98 6 A Family Room West Elevate 4,946.16 4,946.16 7 D BR3 North Elevate 1,132.49 2,264.98 8 A BR3 North Elevate 4,946.16 4,946.16 9 C BR3 West Elevate 925.19 3,700.76 10 H Bath 2 South Essential 1,187.61 1,187.61 11 F Stairs North Elevate 907.44 OMS Ver. 0004.08.01 (Current) Processed on: 6/11/2024 2:38:55 PM For product warranty information please visit, …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-086086 GATEWOOD HOUSE 2900 TARRY TRAIL 15 – 1 PROPOSAL Build a deck and roof addition at the rear detached casita. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Create patio enclosure on rear side of casita, facing the pool. The design is open at the sides and supported by four columns at the side closest to the pool. 3) 2) Construct new hipped roof for new pool deck and flex/gym room at north. Roof pitch and material will not exactly match, but will be compatible with, the historic home’s roof. The new roof will not tie in to the historic at any location. Install new restrooms in existing side rooms at casita interior. These rooms have already been partitioned from previous interventions. In main house, remove one stair accessing the basement from the main floor. Install new basement access at rear exterior of house. 4) ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Two-story Tudor style home set on a linear footprint with an ell at one end, containing most of the bedrooms and living space. The front entry is indicated by a steep octagonal roof projecting out at the hinge of the ell. Second floor windows are present as dormers or at the end gables. Exterior construction is white stone, and the roof is composed of wood shingle. The long axis of the house is largely fenestrated, with a glazed sunroom near one end. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The only work affecting the interior of the house is to close off basement access from a stair, but the stair is to remain and will not be altered. 3. Roofs Proposed roof covers roughly half of the casita structure, specifically the portions of the building that are not used as a garage. Though the roof pitch does not match the steep roof of the main house, as well as being hipped in form rather than gabled, the appearance is appropriate and defers to the historic. It is not proposed to tie into the original house in any location. The current roof at this location is slightly sloped metal roofing and no loss of integrity will occur. 5. Windows, …
16 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-086315 ROBERTSON/STUART & MAIR HISTORIC DISTRICT 1011 EAST 9TH STREET PROPOSAL Restoration of a front porch based on historic imagery. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Demolish non-original (ca. 1949) concrete front porch and extension at left side of house 2) Restore front wall appearance to original, based on historic imagery 3) 4) Install new porch columns and balustrade Install tandem parking slab at side of house and regrade drainage away from building ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS Single-story bungalow with large front gable overhanging a front porch. A small extension appears at the left of the front façade, which is clad in fiberboard siding. The Robertson/Stuart & Mair Historic District Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2. Alterations to Contributing Buildings 1.2.1.3. Do not add a new feature that was not there historically. Proposed designs are based on photos from 1935, which indicate what was present previous to porch alteration and the front extensions at the left of the house. The proposed drawings appear to match in size, scale, and material to the historic imagery, and identify what was installed at a later date that is to be removed. The design successfully avoids an historicized appearance or speculation as to what was original to the house. A less thorough design would likely not have been successful in matching. 1.2.2.1. Front exterior walls While the proposal calls for full removal of the current cladding material on the front and within 15 feet on the sides, it is believed that at least some of the original cladding material is present behind, either to reuse or, at worst, use as a guide to replicate dimension and shape of the waterfall siding. 1.2.2.5. Porches Like above, all current material is proposed to be replaced and changed in design to match historic images. The designs appear to be appropriate in scale and design to match. Though a simplified design might be more appropriate if the original can’t be determined, the more ornate balustrade matches the photo and is appropriate at this location. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. LOCATION MAP 16 – 2
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2023-043027 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1409 ALTA VISTA AVENUE 17 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1926 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story Craftsman with horizontal wood siding, screened wood windows, decorative shutters, a hooded entryway with decorative brackets, and a clipped-gable roof. The house at 1409 Alta Vista Avenue was built around 1926. Until 1947, its occupants were mostly short-term owners and renters, including an engineer, a state highway inspector, an office manager, and a mechanic. The home was then purchased by Frank and Lura Connolly. Frank Connolly was the editor, owner, and publisher of the Texas Tax Journal, while Lura worked both at the journal and as a Red Cross nurse. The Connollys sold the home in the late 1950s to Anna and William Duncum. William Duncum worked as a public school teacher. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of modest Craftsman architecture in Travis Heights. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not appear to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property does not appear to be a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage adaptive reuse and rehabilitation, then relocation over demolition, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. The Historic Landmark Commission must review plans for new construction in National Register Historic Districts before the demolition permit is released. LOCATION MAP 17 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 17 – 3 17 – 4 1952 Frank R. & Lura J. Connolly – Texas Tax Journal Publication Co., Littlefield Bldg. Application, 2023 Occupancy History …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Russell Korte Historic Preservation Office district9@austin.texas.gov; Beeler, Melissa; Qadri, Zo; Fahnestock, Sam; Adrian, Leah; kalan.cotreras@austintexas.gov; Heimsath, Ben - BC; Dudley, Tara - BC Concerns Regarding 1409 Alta Vista Demolition Tuesday, June 11, 2024 9:03:44 AM City Arborist; Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Hello -- I am writing regarding the planned demolition of 1409 Alta Vista Avenue. I am a proponent of new development within our city, but without careful planning and consideration, this project could be an imminent danger to heritage trees on the property, negatively impact the neighborhood and Alta Vista Avenue, and set the wrong precedent for development under updated building codes. I am urging a postponement of the demolition approval until a full development plan is shared and neighborhood concerns are addressed. I observed at the June 5, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission meeting that the owner of this property intends to carry out a full demolition followed by the construction of a triplex. The owner, however, has not attempted to contact or make clear his plans with immediate neighbors or the neighborhood association. As the owner and resident of the house next door, 1407 Alta Vista, I am greatly concerned about the impact of this project on the neighborhood, Alta Vista Avenue, and my property. While I support the creation of additional affordable housing units in our city, I have concerns about approving the demolition of this original structure without a clear understanding of the triplex plans for this lot. My specific concerns include: Preservation of Heritage Trees: There are seven heritage trees documented on the demolition permit. How will the project address the preservation of the beautiful heritage oak trees on the property? How do we ensure that the developer does not willfully violate tree preservation rules? Maintaining Existing Feel and Setbacks How will the project ensure the preservation of existing street's feel? The setbacks create a sense of openness and greenery that is unique and core to the identity of Travis Heights Street and Alley Access and Parking: How will access and parking be managed for three units on this lot? I urge the Historic Landmark Commission, and the city, to hold off on approving the demolition of the existing structure until there is a comprehensive review of the proposed plans to ensure …
From: To: Subject: Date: Hillary Bilheimer Historic Preservation Office Tree Ordinance Review Sunday, June 9, 2024 9:53:41 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello I am writing about 1409 Alta Vista Av 78704 and the proposed development that is being permitted at that location. The developer has submitted plans for demolition of existing and building 3 new structures on the property. With seven heritage trees on the site, I am curious how this will happen. I am very much in support of keeping existing trees and setbacks in this neighborhood (I am an Alta Vista resident, myself). I do not support the current CoA loophole of essentially allowing developers to remove trees by paying a fine. This allows developers to merely absorb the fine in the case where they will turn around and sell whatever they are building at extremely inflated prices. It does nothing to actually preserve our heritage trees. In this particular case, both the developer and architect are from outside of Austin and can be assumed to only see the trees as a nuisance and not as the habitat-providing, shade-providing members of our urban forest that they are. Please let me know what is being done and what can still be done at this stage in order to protect these trees. Thank you Hillary Bilheimer 1802 Alta Vista Av CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
June 28, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission of the City of Austin City Hall - Boards and Commissions Room 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, TX 78701 Email: preservation@austintexas.gov Re: Opposition to PR-2024-033568, Agenda Item No. 10: 1409 Alta Vista Ave. National Register District Permit Application for “Total demolition” by South River City Citizens Neighborhood Association (“SRCC”) To the Historic Landmark Commission: Please find the following resolution passed by SRCC at its June 18, 2024, general membership meeting concerning the above-referenced item on the agenda for your July 3, 2024 meeting. —----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whereas the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District (the “District”) has been recognized by the U.S. Department of the Interior; Whereas the property at 1409 Alta Vista (the “Property”), constructed in 1926, is considered a contributing and protected property within the District; Whereas the application to the National Park Service for certification of the District makes numerous references to the importance of the “landscape,” “tree canopy,” and “dense vegetation” (see page 11) and use of design traditions espoused by Andrew Jackson Downing and Frederick Law Olmstead (see page 13); Whereas the Property has seven significant trees that are integral to the character of the Property, the context of the street and neighborhood, and the nature of the District; Whereas demolition of the existing structure on the Property and the proposed construction of two to three densely-packed structures could damage or compel removal of the significant or heritage trees; Whereas the Historic Landmark Commission of the City of Austin is reviewing application number H-2023-043027 to proceed with demolition and new construction on the Property; Whereas, the District contains many examples of new additions to contributing properties; Whereas, the District contains many examples of Accessory Dwelling Units (“ADUs”) added to an original contributing home; Whereas, such new additions and ADUs illustrate square footage enlargement alternatives to full demolition and new construction; Whereas, the recent Home Options for Mobility and Equity (H.O.M.E) Initiative passed by the Austin City Council in December 2023 and May 2024 provides Preservation and Sustainability Bonuses to property owners who retain the original home; Therefore, be it resolved that SRCC, through vote of its general membership on June 18, 2024, opposes the release of the demolition permit proposed under application number HR-2023-043027, unless and until the owner of the Property can demonstrate plans to adequately protect the trees on the Property and preserve the façade of the contributing …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: CLIFTON LADD Larosche, Carl - BC; McWhorter, Trey - BC; bc-jamie.alvarez@austintexas.gov; Castillo, Raymond - BC; Rubio, JuanRaymon - BC; Evans, Roxanne - BC; Heimsath, Ben - BC; Featherston, Witt; Grogan, Harmony - BC; Dudley, Tara - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC Historic Preservation Office; Susan Armstrong Fisher HLC 7-3-24 meeting, agenda item 10: 1409 Alta Vista (PR-2024-033568) Monday, July 1, 2024 10:33:29 AM External Email - Exercise Caution I am writing to oppose the issuance of a demolition permit for 1409 Alta Vista (PR-2024-033568). I am Co-chair of the South River City Citizens (SRCC) Historic Preservation Committee and a resident of the Travis Heights - Fairview Park National Register Historic District. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. The SRCC approved a resolution regarding this home, which will be provided to you separately. Because of technical difficulties last month, I was unable to speak virtually at that meeting, though I had signed up and was on the line when my name was called. What follows is substantively what I had intended to say, had the system worked as it should have. I will not be able to attend in person or virtually on July 3. Thank you for considering my comments in your decision. The Travis Heights - Fairview Park National Register Historic District includes 353 acres of the South River City Citizens neighborhood area. It includes the core of the neighborhood and many of the oldest homes in the neighborhood. The district was approved in July 2021, because it meets the required eligibility criteria for protection on the National Register. I urge you to disapprove the application for demolition of 1409 Alta Vista. Alta Vista is one of the most important streets in the National Register District. For example, the 2024 Preservation Austin historic homes tour featured the Mabel Davis home at 1308 Alta Vista, just a block away from this home proposed for demolition. Both the house and the separate but associated garage are identified as contributing structures in the National Register Historic District listing. As such, they would need separate applications for a demolition permit. 1409 Alta Vista is a beautiful one-story craftsman home built in approximately 1926. I appreciate the staff review of this home, though I believe the property may meet the three required designation criteria for historic landmark status, including community value. I encourage you to evaluate this further. …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 2024-086522 SB; 2024-086516 SB CONGRESS AVENUE HISTORIC DISTRICT 600 CONGRESS AVENUE 18-19 – 1 PROPOSAL Install a tenant directory sign and an address sign. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) 2) Install directory signs totaling 19 square feet in area. The proposed directory panel is painted steel with cut-out tenant panels backed with white acrylic. Install an awning sign totaling 34 square feet in area. The proposed sign, atop the main entrance canopy, is fabricated with painted aluminum and acrylic. The sign is internally lit with LED lighting; “600” is halo-lit while “Congress” is face-lit. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Guidelines for Signs in National Register Districts are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. The current project includes a directory sign and tenant signs that comply with the guidelines. The sign plan uploaded to backup indicates further planned signage and shows how the address and tenant signs fit into the larger proposed scheme for the building’s individual façade modules. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) offpremise, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. The proposed sign types are not prohibited. Sign Size: The maximum size for signs depends on the sign type: 1. Projecting (blade) signs: 6 square feet 2. Flush-mounted signs: 7% of the overall façade area, with a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet 3. Window signs: The lesser of 20% of the window or 8 square feet 4. Awning signs: The lesser of 20% of …
600 Congress Ave | Exterior Building ID Signs Permit Art Not for construction Date 7.10.2024 Exterior Building ID Signs Permit Info 407 Radam Lane, Suite A100 Austin, TX 78745 512.326.9333 2024 ION ART INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designers contained in this document are the exclusive property of Ion Art, Inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work of project other than the specifi c project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of Ion Art, Inc. ION JOB # CLIENT 6406 600 Congress Ave. PROJECT ADDRESS 600 Congress Ave., Austin, Texas 78701 N Overview - Building ID signs to be permitted • Electrical, illuminated Signs: • Building ID Awning Sign (1x): total display area: 34 SF • Non-illuminated Signs: • Building directory wall sign (1x): total display area: 19 SF - 4 Sq ft per tenant panel (currently ve tenants) • Building ID Signs (Congress Ave.) Total display area: 53 SF • Installation: • Building ID awning sign height: 19’ - 0” AF • Building Directory wall sign height: 3’- 6”AF • Property Address: 600 Congress Ave, Austin, Texas 78701 g ID ctory uildin & Dire B t 4 n a n e T 1ft 8 Additional Permitting Information • Linear feet of storefront width: 462ft - 0in (226LF along Congress Ave.; 236LF along 6th St.) • Setback of signs: • Wall sign: 18ft • Electrical requirements: • Minimum of 1 dedicated 120V 20amp circuit, and J-box within 6ft of sign (per sign; to be installed by others). 407 Radam Lane, Suite A100 Austin, TX 78745 512.326.9333 2024 ION ART INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designers contained in this document are the exclusive property of Ion Art, Inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work of project other than the specifi c project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of Ion Art, Inc. ION JOB # CLIENT 6406 600 Congress Ave. PAGE 1 of 4 PROJECT ADDRESS 600 Congress Ave., Austin, Texas 78701 Building Directory Sign 48” x 57” (19 sq ft) Building ID Sign 33” x 212” (34 sq ft) 19’- 0” 3’- 6” East …
600 Congress Ave | Exterior Signs Master Plan Permit Art Not for construction Date 7.10.2024 Exterior Signs - Master Plan 407 Radam Lane, Suite A100 Austin, TX 78745 512.326.9333 2024 ION ART INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designers contained in this document are the exclusive property of Ion Art, Inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work of project other than the specifi c project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of Ion Art, Inc. ION JOB # CLIENT 6406 600 Congress Ave. PROJECT ADDRESS 600 Congress Ave., Austin, Texas 78701 N Overview - Master Sign Plan • Electrical, illuminated Signs: • Awning Sign (5x): total display area: 106 SF • Wall Sign (4x) - total display area: 55 SF • Projecting Sign (1x) - total display area: 6 SF • Congress Ave. Total display area: 113 SF • 6th St. Total display area: 54 SF • Non-illuminated Signs: • Building directory wall sign (1x): total display area: 19 SF - 4 Sq ft per tenant panel (currently ve tenants) • Installation: • Awning sign height: 14’ - 4” AF • Building ID (awning sign) height: 19’ - 0” AF • Wall sign height: - Building Directory: 3’- 6”AF - Existing tenant: 14’- 2”AF • (existing) Projecting sign height: 14’ - 4” AF • Property Address: 600 Congress Ave, Austin, Texas 78701 g ID ory t uildin c & Dire B t 4 n a n e T 1ft 8 Additional Permitting Information • Linear feet of storefront width: 462ft - 0in (226LF along Congress Ave.; 236LF along 6th St.) • Setback of signs: • Wall sign: 18ft • Electrical requirements: • Minimum of 1 dedicated 120V 20amp circuit, and J-box within 6ft of sign (per sign; to be installed by others). 407 Radam Lane, Suite A100 Austin, TX 78745 512.326.9333 2024 ION ART INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designers contained in this document are the exclusive property of Ion Art, Inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work of project other than the specifi c project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of Ion Art, …
600 Congress Ave | Exterior Building ID Signs Permit Art Not for construction Date 7.10.2024 Exterior Building ID Signs Permit Info 407 Radam Lane, Suite A100 Austin, TX 78745 512.326.9333 2024 ION ART INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designers contained in this document are the exclusive property of Ion Art, Inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work of project other than the specifi c project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of Ion Art, Inc. ION JOB # CLIENT 6406 600 Congress Ave. PROJECT ADDRESS 600 Congress Ave., Austin, Texas 78701 N Overview - Building ID signs to be permitted • Electrical, illuminated Signs: • Building ID Awning Sign (1x): total display area: 34 SF • Non-illuminated Signs: • Building directory wall sign (1x): total display area: 19 SF - 4 Sq ft per tenant panel (currently ve tenants) • Building ID Signs (Congress Ave.) Total display area: 53 SF • Installation: • Building ID awning sign height: 19’ - 0” AF • Building Directory wall sign height: 3’- 6”AF • Property Address: 600 Congress Ave, Austin, Texas 78701 g ID ctory uildin & Dire B t 4 n a n e T 1ft 8 Additional Permitting Information • Linear feet of storefront width: 462ft - 0in (226LF along Congress Ave.; 236LF along 6th St.) • Setback of signs: • Wall sign: 18ft • Electrical requirements: • Minimum of 1 dedicated 120V 20amp circuit, and J-box within 6ft of sign (per sign; to be installed by others). 407 Radam Lane, Suite A100 Austin, TX 78745 512.326.9333 2024 ION ART INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED All rights reserved. The intellectual property, concepts, and designers contained in this document are the exclusive property of Ion Art, Inc. Neither the document nor the information it contains may be copied, disclosed to others, or used in connection with any work of project other than the specifi c project for which it has been prepared and developed, without the written consent of Ion Art, Inc. ION JOB # CLIENT 6406 600 Congress Ave. PAGE 1 of 4 PROJECT ADDRESS 600 Congress Ave., Austin, Texas 78701 Building Directory Sign 48” x 57” (19 sq ft) Building ID Sign 33” x 212” (34 sq ft) 19’- 0” 3’- 6” East …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-064449, GF-2024-073048; HR-2024-085976 WILSHIRE WOOD NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 4200 WILSHIRE PARKWAY 20-21 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1947 house and construct a new building in its place. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new house is one story, clad in fiber cement siding with wood, stone, and salvaged limestone accents. Rooflines include a standing-seam metal shed roof with exposed rafter tails, as well as a hipped low-slope membrane roof at the secondary wing. Fenestration includes a combination of clerestory windows, vertically and horizontally oriented fixed-pane windows, and fully glazed doors. One-story cross-gabled house clad in siding and cut-stone veneer, with multilight steel casement windows and a front-facing garage. The house at 4200 Wilshire Parkway was built in 1947 by developers Bradfield and Brush. Its earliest occupants were William and Rachel Willis. William Willis worked at the Bireley’s Beverages bottling plant on Fifth Street. By the late 1950s, the Willises had sold the property to Charles L. and Bessie Simonsen. The Simonsens, a retired couple, had moved from Pittsburgh to be closer to their son, who taught chemistry at the University of Texas. The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DESIGN STANDARDS Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building is sited in approximately the same location as the existing house. 2. Orientation The proposed building is oriented toward the primary street. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale, massing, and height appear appropriate to the district. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions only somewhat reflect the proportions of contributing buildings, though its one-story height and canted wings appear to increase compatibility. 5. Design and style The proposed building’s design and style does not appear to reflect the contributing buildings in the district, though its height and materials appear to increase compatibility. 6. Roofs The proposed roofline appears more complex than the simple rooflines present on contributing structures. 7. Exterior walls Exterior wall materials are appropriate. 8. Windows and doors The proposed building’s fenestration is somewhat compatible. 11. Attached garages and carports Though the proposed garage is oriented toward the main street, it is visually light and does not appear as a focal point. …
City of Austin Development Services Department Land Status Determination 1995 Rule Platting Exception June 13, 2024 File Number: C8I-2024-0092 Address: 4200 WILSHIRE PKWY Tax Parcel I.D.# 0218110524 Tax Map Date: 06/13/2024 The Development Services Department Review has determined that this parcel, as described in the attached description and map, IS EXCEPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO PLAT in accordance with the Land Development Code, Section 25-4-2(C), and is eligible to receive utility service. The parcel of land consists of five acres or less, and is described as being LOT 4, LESS N5FT & SE TRI, WILSHIRE PARK; LOT 3, BLOCK 4, S CEN E PART OF WILSHIRE WOOD, SEC 3, Travis County, Texas in the current deed, recorded on Mar 30, 2007, in Document #2007057101, Travis County Deed Records. This parcel existed in its current configuration on January 1,1995, as evidenced by a deed recorded on Jun 26, 1984, in Volume 8668, Page 591, Travis County Deed Records. The parcel was lawfully receiving utility service, as defined in Section 212.012 of the Texas Local Government Code, on January 1, 1995, as evidenced by water service on Sep 24, 1947. The parcel meets the requirements of the Land Development Code for roadway frontage and is located on an existing street. Additional Notes/Conditions: NONE This determination of the status of the property is based on the application of Chapter 212, Municipal Regulation of Subdivisions and Property Development, Texas Local Government Code; and the City of Austin Land Development Code, Chapter 25-4, Subdivision. Recognition hereby does not imply approval of any other portion of the City Code or any other regulation. By: _Patrick Collins_____________________________________ Patrick Collins, Representative of the Director Development Services Department Tax Parcel I.D.# 0218110524 Tax Map Date: 06/13/2024
Hallmark Inspections, LLC INSPECTED FOR Meghan Hughes 4200 Wilshire Pkwy Austin, TX 78722 May 21, 2024 Hallmark Inspections, LLC 1805 Sanchez St Austin, TX 78702 Phone 512-660-7061 aaronwedemeyer@gmail.com SOLD TO: Meghan Hughes TX INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER 20240521-01 INVOICE DATE 05/21/2024 LOCATION 4200 Wilshire Pkwy REALTOR DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT SUBTOTAL TAX TOTAL BALANCE DUE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT FORM Meghan Hughes Name of Client 4200 Wilshire Pkwy, Austin, TX 78722 Address of Inspected Property Aaron Wedemeyer Name of Inspector Name of Sponsor (if applicable) 05/21/2024 Date of Inspection 26252 TREC License # TREC License # PURPOSE OF INSPECTION A real estate inspection is a visual survey of a structure and a basic performance evaluation of the systems and components of a building. It provides information regarding the general condition of a residence at the time the inspection was conducted. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. Ask the inspector to clarify any items or comments that are unclear. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSPECTOR This inspection is governed by the Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) Standards of Practice (SOPs), which dictates the minimum requirements for a real estate inspection. The inspector IS required to: use this Property Inspection Report form for the inspection; inspect only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection; indicate whether each item was inspected, not inspected, or not present; indicate an item as Deficient (D) if a condition exists that adversely and materially affects the performance of a system or component OR constitutes a hazard to life, limb or property as specified by the SOPs; and explain the inspector’s findings in the corresponding section in the body of the report form. The inspector IS NOT required to: identify all potential hazards; turn on decommissioned equipment, systems, utilities, or apply an open flame or light a pilot to operate any appliance; climb over obstacles, move furnishings or stored items; prioritize or emphasize the importance of one deficiency over another; provide follow-up services to verify that proper repairs have been made; or inspect system or component listed under the optional section of the SOPs (22 TAC 535.233). RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CLIENT While items identified as Deficient (D) in an inspection report DO NOT obligate any party to make repairs or take other actions, in the event that any further evaluations …
To Whom It May Concern: We have been hired as the general contractor for Meghan Hughes home at 4200 Wilshire Parkway. We specialize in both new construction and remodeling of residential and commercial projects. In our experience, we have found new construction of most homes to be more efficient in both time and cost. New construction also allows us to properly install adequate water proofing methods and energy efficient insulation and heating and cooling systems. The existing construction of Meghan’s home will not allow for proper exterior wall and roof insulation, or adequate vapor barriers. This combination can lead to potential issues with moisture build up and possibly mold in the future. It is also our experience in remodels of homes from the 1940s, that if the owner does desire to install proper insulation and vapor barrier systems, that very little of the existing home is actually remaining at the completion of the project. Thank you for your consideration for this project. Please let us know if you need any additional information from our team at Archive Properties. Sincerely, Ken Dineen Owner - Archive Properties
Water/Wastewater Service Plan Verification Form (WWWSPV) 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive | 512-972-1000 Option 3 | AWTaps@austintexas.gov Service Address: Lot: ALL FIELDS ARE REQUIRED Block: Subdivision: Will the dwelling units be demolished? Are there multiple dwelling units on the lot? Land Status or re-subdivision? Original Address: Are new dwelling units being built? Is this a corner lot? Existing Lot Use: Proposed Use: If SFR, sq ft: If Proposed Use is Other, describe the structure to be built: Existing Bath Count: Additional Bath Count: Proposed Bath Count Meter #1: Meter #2: Existing protected trees to remain on lot? Refer to the City Arborist website for required levels of tree protection. Water meters and wastewater cleanouts are not permitted in sidewalks or driveways Relocation of services from sidewalks or driveways shall be performed at the applicant's expense. The applicant listed below attests that the information provided is deemed accurate and complete based on available records. The applicant is responsible to confirm the location and suitability of existing water and wastewater services. The applicant may be responsible for costs associated to corrections due to incomplete or invalid information provided. Applicant Name Date Applicant Phone Applicant Email Submit this form along with plot plan, site plan or building plan to AWTaps@austintexas.gov. Plans must clearly mark all utilities and any tree critical root zones. Failure to comply may result in this form being rejected. Austin Water Use Only - Submit supporting documentation to Applicant when responding Water main size: Water service size: Water service material: Existing water service line/meter location: Existing Meter #s: Shared service? Proposed new meter size(s): Existing meter size(s): If Yes, meter #/size/address: Wastewater main size: WW service size: Clean-out location: WO denoting WW service line work: Water or wastewater main located on property? REQUIRED ACTIONS Secondary Address Needed? Land Status Determination Needed? Meter Purchase Required? Utility Plan Required? Comments Taps Permitting Office Staff Signature Date of Signature Stamp WWWSPV Form - revised 10/2/2023 116 118 117 103 101 104 102 112 110 111 106 107 105 108 109 113 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 116 117 118 TREE TABLE TREE TAG NO. TREE TYPE 15.5" CEDAR ELM 14" CEDAR ELM 13.5" CEDAR ELM 11.5" CEDAR ELM 19" CEDAR ELM 18" CEDAR ELM 14.5" CEDAR ELM 15" CEDAR ELM 16" CEDAR ELM 10" CEDAR ELM 18" CEDAR ELM 19.5" CEDAR ELM 10" CEDAR ELM 19" …
June 20, 2024 Meghan Hughes 4200 Wilshire Parkway Austin, Texas 78722 Re: Structural Observations of Existing Single-Family Residence 4200 Wilshire Parkway Austin, Texas 78722 Dear Meghan, As per your request, a representative of Fort Structures has reviewed the conditions of the existing residence that was built in approximately 1948. A home inspection report was issued on May 21, 2024 by Hallmark Inspections. The existing foundation is a concrete slab on grade with shallow perimeter grade beams. The inspection report points out sheetrock cracks, foundation cracks, and exterior veneer cracks, which are indicative of foundation movement. There are many cracked floor finishes, and cracks are visible at the garage floor. This property is located in an Erosion Hazard Zone (EHZ). An EHZ Analysis was done by Capital Geotechnical Services PLLC on April 18, 2024. The 4:1 incision slope analyzed in the report encompasses the back of the existing house. In the event of a substantial flood, the back of the house would be at risk of being undermined, and could fail. We recommend that any new construction be built on a deep foundation system designed to withstand a potential flood event. Additionally, there is a vast amount of rotting wood cladding that likely extends into the walls of the structure. Extensive water damage is present in various parts of the ceiling, walls, and floor finishes. The anticipated lifespan of a single-family residence is 50 years, and this structure has surpassed that by one and a half times. Making repairs to the existing structure would be cumbersome and expensive, and nearly the entire home would end up being rebuilt. Based on the current condition and the proximity to the EHZ, we recommend building a new structure. If you have any questions regarding the information in this report, please feel free to contact me at 512-817- 9264, or Thank you for your business. Sincerely, FORT Structures, Inc By: Samuel Covey, P.E. Its: Principal, TX Reg# 123,796 FORT Structures, Inc. TBPE Firm# 18034 June 20, 2024 June 20, 2024 4200 Wilshire Structural Observation Letter PG 1 of 1
Dear City of Austin & Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Meghan Hughes, and I am writing to express the utmost importance of demolishing my current home that I own at 4200 Wilshire Parkway. My goal is to create a safe and beautifully designed dwelling, utilizing long-time Austin locals - Engineers, Contractors, and Architects. For over 17 years I’ve been a resident of 4200 Wilshire Parkway, I am very active in my community. I volunteer with the neighborhood association and have adopted Boggy Creek @ Airport Blvd. , and regularly clean the creek with my neighbors. I walk my dog everyday in the neighborhood and am engaged with the residents of Cherrywood. Prior to submitting the demolition application I went out of my way to inform my neighbors of my intentions, making my home plans available, and having the team available for questions. At the time of writing this letter, I am planning to host an open-house with the design and construction team as a courtesy to the neighborhood. My team is working to design and build a high-quality personal residence, not a speculative development for sale, that is sensitive to the neighboring context, trees, and the character of the neighborhood. This home was built in 1947 and has old inefficient windows, little insulation, rotten siding, doors that don’t fully lock (in fact an intruder broke into my bedroom two summers ago because of this issue), an HVAC system and ductwork that are over 30 years past their life expectancy with mold throughout the ducts, and a foundation that is in literal shambles, and doesn’t use best practices that we now have in 2024. A renovation of this home would be a significant and unreasonable hardship, resulting in too great of a financial burden to bare for a compromised end result, as there is a lack of valuable or potentially reusable materials, assemblies, and systems in the house, and due to obsolete building standards and construction practices that were utilized in 1947. A new home would greatly improve the existing conditions of the property, as well as improve my own health, safety, and welfare for years to come. The City of Austin has just completed a gorgeous improvement of the Pharr Tennis Center at Patterson Park, across the street from my home. I believe the improvements proposed at my property, supplemented by the recent improvements of the Pharr Tennis Facility, …
4200 WILSHIRE PARKWAYDEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATIONHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSIONJULY 3, 2024www.emadiarch.comemadi MEET THE TEAM: OWNER: Meghan Hughes PROPOSAL FOR TOTAL DEMOLITION FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION: Please consider the approval for total demolition of the existing failing single-story, single-family home at 4200 Wilshire Parkway that is well beyond its reasonable lifecycle and to allow the design and construction of a new single-story, single-family home for the current resident, Meghan Hughes. This is not a speculative design to be built and sold, nor is it a rental or STR cash-flow property - it is a dream home. As evidenced by the numerous support letters provided as backup, Meghan has gone out of her way to openly inform the neighborhood of her intentions, and introduce the proposed improvements and team to her neighbors. A resident at 4200 Wilshire for over 17 years, Meghan intends to build a sensible new home keeping with the neighborhood’s charm, character, and qualities that drew her to it in the first place. The team is a collection of local, award-winning professionals, many of which are UT Austin graduates, long-time Austin residents, or native Austinites with extensive experience designing, engineering, and building thoughtful, considerate, and appropriate projects in Austin. The team is familiar with design, engineering, and construction in residential settings benefitted by large trees and nearby bodies of water. As part of the proposed demolition process, we will be reclaiming as much of the existing limestone as possible, to be elegantly reincorporated into the new home’s design. Additionally, we have coordinated with the Austin Fire Department and nearby Station #14 to donate the home for controlled training prior to demolition. This training opportunity will include new, advanced life-saving technology for AFD’s consideration. From AFD: “We want to thank you for working with the Austin Fire Department to provide an acquired structure for training. The work we can do in a real building is invaluable and prepares us to face the challenges of an active structure fire in the city.” The neighborhood was invited by Meghan to open-house that occurred on June 20, 2024 with this presentation and the Architect available. INTERIOR DESIGNER: Natalie Ammirato ARCHITECT & INTERIOR DESIGNER: EMADI - Ian Ellis, AIA, NCARB, RID & Jessica McCarty STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Fort Structures - Sam Covey, PE & Paula Wright, PE GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Archive Properties - Ken Dineen & Jordan Sheftel TEAM INFORMATION emadi4200 WILSHIRE PARKWAYHistoric Landmark …
July 28, 2024 City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: Case numbers: 2024-064449 PR (Demolition) 2024-085976 HR (New Construction) Dear Commissioners, I am writing, as President of the Wilshire Wood/Delwood 1 Neighborhood Association, in support of the request being made to the City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Department by homeowner Megan Hughes and her architect Ian Ellis for the demolition permit and building permit needed to pursue their planned new home construction at 4200 Wilshire Parkway, Austin, TX. 78722. That address is within the boundaries of the Wilshire Wood/Delwood 1 Neighborhood. I support the two requests for the following reasons: • I have been briefed personally, while reviewing schematics, documents, etc. that the existing building to be demolished has structural foundation problems that preclude working with the existing slab and other structural elements on any restoration or as part of any new construction. • I have extensively reviewed Meghan’s plans for her new build, and conclude that Meghan and architect Ian Ellis have come up with a very neighborhood-sensitive design, as regards materials, scale, massing, and design compatibility – including height – with other homes on the street. Their design in fact follows recommendations in the City of Austin’s own, recently updated Historic Design Standards for new construction. I was on the Committee that wrote those new City of Austin Historic Design Standards, that were formally adopted by the City of Austin in November 2022. (I was invited to be on that committee by Cara Bertron, who ran that committee and who is still at the City in the Planning department. See page 3 of the document linked above, for the reference to my participation.) I’d comment in particular that the design proposed by Meghan and Ian follows the design prescriptions outlined in the chapter of the COA Historic Design Standards called “Residential New Construction” – specifically Section 5 of that chapter with guidelines for “Design and Style.” Please let me know if I can provide any more input or answer questions. Thank you, David Keene • President, Wilshire Wood/Delwood 1 Neighborhood Association (WWD1 NA) – also representing the Wilshire National Historic District. The WWD1 NA is officially registered with the City of Austin. • Section 106 Committee (that reviews project impact on historic properties and historic districts), Project Connect Austin, representing WWD1. I was appointed to this committee by the U.S. Department of Transportation. • Section …
Libby Chennell 4113 Lullwood Rd Austin, TX 78722 To the neighbors, friends, and stewards of our community, Austin has been rapidly changing; everywhere you look there are single family homes being subdivided into multi-dwelling lots and developers tearing down heritage properties in favor of monotonous modern boxes focused more on the bottom line than the integrity of the neighborhood. It can be frustrating to imagine the impact this can have on our wonderful, diverse, and welcoming area. In renovating and adding to her home at 4200 Wilshire Parkway, Meghan Hughes, a member of the community for nearly 20 years, is thoughtfully preserving the beauty and integrity of the houses in our historic mid-century neighborhood. She has ensured that her design preserves the limestone masonry found afront most original Wilshirewood/Delwood 2 homes and is taking steps to ensure that the project benefits the surrounding area by allowing the nearby Airport Rd. fire station to utilize her pre-renovation home for training. Meghan is a great example of what makes our community so special, taking an active role in cleaning up our local public greenspace (which is how I came to know her), and helping so many of her neighbors in times of need. I so appreciate having her here and look forward to how her home renovation adds to our ever-changing bit of Austin. Sincerely, Libby Chennell
Lisa Laratta 4008 Cherrywood Rd Austin, TX 78722 Tuesday June 4, 2024 To whom it may concern, Thank you, Lisa Laratta I am writing this letter in enthusiastic support of the complete demolition of the current home of Meghan Hughes at 4200 Wilshire Pkwy and the subsequent build by emadi architects. I have been Meghan’s neighbor for over a decade and I am aware of the problems the current aging home poses to her comfort, lifestyle and finances. I know that she will proceed with the new building plans with integrity and care for the property and her neighbors, bringing value and beauty to our neighborhood. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions or concerns.
Neighbor support letter - 4200 Wilshire Pkwy, 78722 1 message Meghan Hughes < To: Ian Ellis < >, Jessica McCarty < > > Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 12:40 PM Ian Ellis > Meghan Hughes Realtor @ propertie’s | Christie’s International 303.263.0904 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Grace Tsao < Date: Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 6:33 AM Subject: 4200 Wilshire Pkwy, 78722 To: < > > In reference to Meghan Hughes address: 4200 Wilshire Pkwy, 78722 Cheers, Grace Tsao 1510 Wilshire Blvd, Austin, TX 78722 I support Meghan Hughes's new home plans. I have lived next door to Meghan for years and know that this home will be a lovely addition to our neighborhood.
I am writing in regards to Meghan Hughe’s application for a demolition permit at 4200 Wilshire Pkwy. As someone who has volunteered alongside Meghan Hughes in various neighborhood initiatives, I have seen her dedication to our community firsthand. The plans for their new house reflect a deep understanding of our neighborhood’s character and an admirable vision for its future. The design respects the spirit of our area, while tastefully enhancing its aesthetic. This thoughtful approach will seamlessly integrate the new construction with the existing homes, maintaining the neighborhood’s cohesive charm. June 9, 2024 Thanks, Kevin Sullivan Kevin Sullivan 1309 Crestwood Rd Austin, TX 78722
To whom it may concern, I would like to express my enthusiastic support for Meghan Hughes in her application for a demolition permit at 4200 Wilshire Pkwy. As an architectural designer and a fellow resident, I am impressed with the proposed plans for the new house. The design is an excellent blend of old and new, capturing the historical essence of our neighborhood while introduc- ing contemporary elements that enhance its overall aesthetic. This balance ensures that the new construction will not only respect but also enrich the character of our community. It is a thoughtful vision that preserves our heritage while thoughtfully integrating modern touches. June 12, 2024 Best, Frances Peterson Frances Peterson 1409 Crestwood Rd Austin, TX 78722
Dear Members of the Historic Preservation Committee, I am writing to support my neighbor, Meghan Hughes, in her application for a demolition permit at 4200 Wilshire Pkwy. The proposed plans for her new house are done with great sensitivity to our neighborhood’s existing charac- ter. The design preserves the spirit and scale we all value, while adding a tasteful enhancement to our area. This thoughtful approach ensures that the new construction will blend seamlessly with the surrounding homes, maintaining the aesthetic harmony of our neighborhood. I believe approving this permit will not only benefit Meghan but also help sustain the cohesiveness and appeal of our community. Thank you for considering my support. Sincerely, Matthew Peterson 4106 Lullwood Rd Austin, TX 78722 06-14-2024
From: To: Subject: Date: Dan Brotman Historic Preservation Office 4200 Wilshire Parkway GF 24-073048 Monday, June 24, 2024 2:21:07 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern on the historic landmark commission: I wish to voice my opposition to the demolition of 4200 Wilshire Parkway. The "hearing" the committee set for this project is at a really inconvenient time for most.Why would you schedule a hearing at 6 pm on the night before a national holiday weekend. Was it so that no one could oppose the demo? 6pm at City Hall on JUly 3rd? Is this a joke? Last year the commission allowed Richard Lent to build at 4206 Wilshire Parkway. I opposed the demo and rebuild because the house in no way keeps with the historic designation of this street. His "one story" house (that is tall as many two story buildings) made up of cheap modular materials is an eyesore and immediately has an effect on my house at 4204 Wilshire Pkwy, Austin, TX 78722. The owners have installed cameras directly pointed at my property. They have installed landscaping that makes it virtually impossible for me to back up out of my driveway safely Materials and Height of property are extremely inconsistent with the historical house on this street. In short, just a big mobile home on 3 foot piers that towers over my original 1948 home. Is that what they are going to build at 4200 Wilshire? Wilshire Parkway used to be a tight knit street and now houses are being demolished one after the other. One individual demoed a house at 4208 just so they could have a bigger yard. At 4201 you allowed Mary Wilson to build a VERY dangerous fence that blocks off site around the corner so that an accident is bound to happen. You allowed her to build a pool in her front yard. Is that is line with historical homes from the 1940s. All these changes have changed Wilshire Parkway into a street most likely seen in California. Do you really want the older long term owners and renters on this street to be pushed out in favor of these homes? Please contact me at 512 587 3770. Regards, Dan Brotman Owner of 4204 Wilshire Parkway since 2010 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Case GF 24-073048 - 4200 Wilshire Parkway Friday, June 28, 2024 6:02:31 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Hello. I am writing to offer my support for the construction at 4200 Wilshire Parkway (Case GF 24-073048). I am a neighbor, living at 4101 Lullwood Rd. We have seen the plans and appreciate the attention to honoring the history of the neighborhood. We think the new home will be a great addition to the neighborhood. Take care, Trent 512-924-3478 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
UPDATED FOR AUGUST 7 HLC HEARING: Includes revision updates from July 10 Architectural Review Committee discussion. Please see updated Axonometric and Elevation Views for the incorporated comments below: Provided divided lite, operable windows at Kitchen and Office (East, Street-Facing Elevation) 4200 WILSHIRE PARKWAYDEMOLITION & NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATIONHISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSIONUPDATED FOR AUGUST 7, 2024www.emadiarch.comemadi MEET THE TEAM: OWNER: Meghan Hughes PROPOSAL FOR TOTAL DEMOLITION FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION: Please consider the approval for total demolition of the existing failing single-story, single-family home at 4200 Wilshire Parkway that is well beyond its reasonable lifecycle and to allow the design and construction of a new single-story, single-family home for the current resident, Meghan Hughes. This is not a speculative design to be built and sold, nor is it a rental or STR cash-flow property - it is a dream home. As evidenced by the numerous support letters provided as backup, Meghan has gone out of her way to openly inform the neighborhood of her intentions, and introduce the proposed improvements and team to her neighbors. A resident at 4200 Wilshire for over 17 years, Meghan intends to build a sensible new home keeping with the neighborhood’s charm, character, and qualities that drew her to it in the first place. The team is a collection of local, award-winning professionals, many of which are UT Austin graduates, long-time Austin residents, or native Austinites with extensive experience designing, engineering, and building thoughtful, considerate, and appropriate projects in Austin. The team is familiar with design, engineering, and construction in residential settings benefitted by large trees and nearby bodies of water. As part of the proposed demolition process, we will be reclaiming as much of the existing limestone as possible, to be elegantly reincorporated into the new home’s design. Additionally, we have coordinated with the Austin Fire Department and nearby Station #14 to donate the home for controlled training prior to demolition. This training opportunity will include new, advanced life-saving technology for AFD’s consideration. From AFD: “We want to thank you for working with the Austin Fire Department to provide an acquired structure for training. The work we can do in a real building is invaluable and prepares us to face the challenges of an active structure fire in the city.” The neighborhood was invited by Meghan to open-house that occurred on June 20, 2024 with this presentation and the Architect available. INTERIOR …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 3, 2024 HR-2024-055618 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1607 KENWOOD AVENUE 22 – 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a side addition to a ca. 1940 house, enclosing a detached studio building. 1) Combine 1-story, single-family house and detached studio building. The extended front wall will be flush with the original house, extending to the footprint of the patio at the side and the studio at the rear. The proposed design changes the house from a 2-bedroom, 1-bathroom to a 3-bedroom, 2-bathroom. 2) Partially demolish roofs of both structures and build new roof connecting them and over new construction. The side gable at the front of the house will be extended with matching dimensions, with two gables projecting to the rear at the existing house and remainder of the studio roof system. 3) Remove front window and door & install new fixtures. 4) Move driveway & install a new path to front entry. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register nomination describes the house as an intact, contributing example of the Minimal Traditional style built in a rectangular plan. The front elevation features a door at center, with a 1/1 window on either side. A side gable roof is present, with a front gable projecting outwards, covering the front entryway. To the southeast of the main house is a small, detached studio space with a front gable roof extending towards the front of the property. The southwest corner of the property is enclosed by a wood fence that forms a patio space behind it. The house at 1607 Kenwood Avenue was constructed around 1938, and was advertised as a 5-room bungalow rental for $32.50 a month. No records are present indicating who occupied the property until 1941, when it housed Roy & Ruth Krezdorn. Mr. Krezdorn worked as an electrical engineer at the Lower Colorado River Authority at this time, and Mrs. Krezdorn was active in Austin social groups, including Junior Helping Hand and St. Martin’s Lutheran Church. Later Roy worked in a managerial role, as well as an adjunct professor for engineering, and Ruth gave birth to three children. By this time they were no longer listed as residing at the modest bungalow on Kenwood Avenue, and listings had the Curtis family occupying the space, who would later appear on a notice for delinquent taxes. At some point …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS JULY 3, 2024 HR-2024-048021 1519 ALAMEDA DRIVE TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 7 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct a new house and pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS The proposed new house is three stories tall, with a habitable basement and garage beneath the two main floors. Materials include concrete and stucco with vertical wood accents; alternately, vertical seamed metal and stone are proposed as accents. The proposed building comprises three rectangular masses with flat roofs of varying heights. Fenestration includes undivided corner and vertical windows, a front-facing garage, and an obscured front door atop a walled staircase. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed building appears appropriately sited. 2. Orientation The proposed building is oriented toward the street. The front-facing garage at the front of the building is not compatible with the standards. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed building’s scale and height exceed those of nearby contributing buildings, and its massing is more complicated. Wall-plane offsets are used to reduce its monumentality when viewed from the street. 4. Proportions The proposed building’s proportions are not compatible with the surrounding historic district. 5. Design and style Though the proposed building is internally consistent in design and style, it does not appear to reflect the design or style of the surrounding district. 6. Roofs The proposed flat roofs do not reflect the roof styles of surrounding contributing buildings. 7. Exterior walls The proposed wood and stucco materials are mostly compatible; stone and metal options are less compatible. 8. Windows and doors The proposed fenestration does not reflect the fenestration styles present in surrounding contributing buildings. 11. Attached garages and carports See 2. Summary The project does not meet most of the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Use dark colors to disguise massing and scale. Do not use option with wood siding. Ensure the garage blends. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on plans. 7 – 2 LOCATION MAP 7 – 3
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 HR-2024-072700 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 707 EAST MONROE STREET 24 – 1 PROPOSAL Construct an ADU at rear of property. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS Construct a two-story accessory dwelling unit on the site of a previously permitted and demolished carport at the rear of the property. ADU is proposed to be 2-bedroom, 2-bathroom, with a garage facing the existing side driveway. Two exterior doors, one adjacent to the garage and one to the side under a second-floor porch, provide access. Several large windows appear at the north and west elevations, which are viewed as the front of the ADU. In addition to the second-floor side porch, the exterior walls feature awnings over all windows. Roof is to be hipped and set at a moderate pitch. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Two-story craftsman house with porch at one front corner and a front gable facing the street at the other. Second floor was built as an addition to the rear of the property. Windows are in good condition and the screens appear to be original. The main roof is a large side gable that creates a good amount of height to the house, which is set slightly above the street elevation. Siding appears to be asbestos or similar, and the house is raised on piers with a vented crawlspace. The house at 707 East Monroe Street was constructed around 1941 as part of the development of south Austin that was occurring throughout the area at the time. The building was first owned by Cecil & Minnie Warren. Mr. Warren worked as a porter, then as a chef, at the Stephen F. Austin Hotel on Congress Avenue. Mrs. Warren lost a brother in World War II, off the coast of France. As of 1947, the house was owned by Mrs. Ruth Phelps, who worked as a stenographer at the Texas State Board of Embalming. After another ownership change, the house was bought by Frank & Madie Tisdale, who lived there for several years, with their daughter eventually marrying and moving in 1955 to Japan with her children to join her husband, who was serving overseas. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-071202; GF-2024-086393 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1106 ENFIELD ROAD 25 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1926 house. ARCHITECTURE The house at 1106 Enfield Road is a two-story eclectic Mission Revival house with troweled stucco cladding, multi-light casement windows, a compound flat and gabled roof covered in red clay tile, and decorative details including a tapered stucco chimney and arched gateway. Landscape features include an arched limestone bridge and limestone retaining walls. RESEARCH The house at 1106 Enfield Road, originally addressed as 6 Enfield Road as part of the Pease estate was subdivided, was constructed between 1924 and 1926. Its first occupants were realtor John Brizendine Riley, his wife, Texann, and their two children. Riley, who originally worked for the Stacy Realty Company, was appointed as sales agent of the new Pemberton Heights neighborhood by the Austin Development Corporation in 1927. By the early 1930s, the Rileys had sold the home to Jake J. Hendricks and his family. Hendricks worked for the Texas Department of Education as the chief of the textbook division. Son George Hendricks also went into education, becoming a junior high school teacher and author of at least one book on Texas history. During the 1950s and 1960s, the home was owned by the Coughran family. Walter E. Coughran was a salesman with the Higginbotham Baily Company, a wholesale dry-goods firm. After around 1966, the property was purchased by the City of Austin in preparation for a new crosstown expressway; however, the roadway was never constructed. Instead, the City began leasing out the home. Most renters were short-term, and included politician Terence O’Rourke and multiple University of Texas professors. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is constructed with an eclectic combination of Spanish Revival and Mission Revival b. Historical association. The property is associated with realtor John Brizendine Riley, though he only lived in c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human influences. the home …
Historic Land Commission 1106 Enfield Road August 7, 2024 Ricca Keepers Demolition Request Subject property is 1106 Enfield Road which we are asking to demolish • Owner Dr. Caryn Carlson has been a Professor of Psychology at the University of Texas for many years • Roof leak/damage, with internal water damage, e.g., paint peeling, mildew and possible mold on walls • Main supporting beam is rotten • A/C not functioning Rear-yard Home was built in 1925 • Fence in backyard has fallen • Sewage line exposed in down backyard • Water leak inside the house with extensive ceiling and beam damage Rear External broken/peeling masonry, very large parts of the external stucco have fallen off the walls Internal walls have extensive cracks Cracks on external concrete/tiles and internal tiles indicating foundation problems Outdated electrical wiring (knob and tube) Galvanized pipes throughout the house Side of House Framing and Structural Concerns Framing and Structural Concerns Framing and Structural Concerns Thank you!
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum August 1, 2024 Dear Chair Heimsath and Historic Landmark Commissioners, The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association, OWANA, Zoning Committee has voted to oppose the purposed demolition of 1106 Enfield Road. The sole purpose of the demolition, like the zoning change, is to hopefully increase the marketability of the property. Chapter 25-11, Article 4 Section J of the COA Land Development Code states: The building official may not release a demolition or relocation permit for a building or structure deemed contributing to a National Register Historic District or a historic area (HD) combining district until the Commission has reviewed and made recommendations on the application for a building permit for the site, unless the building official determines that demolition or relocation is necessary for reasons related to public safety. Plans for new development have always been a requirement for demolition of a contributing structure. There are no plans or drawings to accompany this demolition and its sole purpose is for speculative sale of the land. The property was listed for sale last January 2023 and delisted for lack of offers in July 2023. Since its rezoning the last two contracts on the property were for single family use and both declined to follow through as the price was not feasible. The rezoning was in vain and we suggest the proposed demolition is in vain. The house has been vacant for more than a year. OWANA does not support demolition based solely on financial hardship. The Zoning Committee reminds the City of Austin that re-zoning this property did not guarantee its sale. The current real estate market has slowed due to rising interest rates. There are other MF properties for sale in our neighborhood that have been on the market for a while and are not selling due to the current market conditions and desired sale prices. Additionally, the sale of this property is complicated by its location on Enfield Road. Access to the property is on a sloped, curved, one-way section of Enfield Road that neighbors find dangerous. Because of this, nearby neighbors oppose any redevelopment without seeing plans or drawings. Please oppose the demolition of 1106 Enfield Road. OWANA does not want to set a precedent of up- zoning based on …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-077690; GF-2024-086395 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1508 B PEASE ROAD 26 – 1 Demolish a ca. 1947 contributing garage apartment. PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Two-story garage apartment with pyramidal hipped roof, double bay doors at first floor, horizontal siding, and 6:6 wood windows. The apartment at 1508 B Pease Rd. Unit B was constructed in 1947 by Mike and Ethel Balagia, who lived in the main house on the property, as a rental unit. Residents of 1508 B Pease Rd. included teachers, draftsmen and engineers, a pharmacist, and a clerk. Mike Balagia worked as a butcher, a grocery store owner, and a clerk for the Adjutant General. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. New construction in National Register districts must be reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission before the permit may be pulled. LOCATION MAP 26 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 26 – 3 26 – 4 Demolition permit application, 2024 Occupancy History City Directory Research, July 2024 1992 Unit A: Joseph G. Staffel, renter - Student Unit B: Susan E. Kimbrough, renter 1984 1508 Pease Rd: Gaylord Armstrong, renter 1508 ½ Pease Rd: Emily L. Thigpen, renter 1981 1508 Pease Rd: Mrs. Ethel B. Balagia, owner – Retired 1508 ½ Pease Rd: Nancy Glass - Employee at Austin Community College …
Austin Property Inspections PO Box 92015 Austin, Texas 78709 512.848.3523 gary@austinpropertyinspections.com PROPERTY INSPECTION REPORT Jennifer Hanlen (Name of Client) 1508 Pease Road, Unit B, Austin, Texas 78703 (Address or Other Identification of Inspected Property) Gary Hart TREC# 7396 mb.#512.848.3523 7/25/2024 (Name and License Number of Inspector) (Name, License Number and Signature of Sponsoring Inspector, if required) (Date) Prepared For: Concerning: By: This property inspection report may include an inspection agreement (contract), addenda, and other information related to property conditions. If any item or comment is unclear, you should ask the inspector to clarify the findings. It is important that you carefully read ALL of this information. This inspection is subject to the rules (“Rules”) of the Texas Real Estate Commission (“TREC”), which can be found at www.trec.state.tx.us. The TREC Standards of Practice (Sections 535.227-535.231 of the Rules) are the minimum standards for inspections by TREC-licensed inspectors. An inspection addresses only those components and conditions that are present, visible, and accessible at the time of the inspection. While there may be other parts, components or systems present, only those items specifically noted as being inspected were inspected. The inspector is not required to move furnishings or stored items. The inspection report may address issues that are code-based or may refer to a particular code; however, this is NOT a code compliance inspection and does NOT verify compliance with manufacturer’s installation instructions. The inspection does NOT imply insurability or warrantability of the structure or its components. Although some safety issues may be addressed in this report, this inspection is NOT a safety/code inspection, and the inspector is NOT required to identify all potential hazards. In this report, the inspector will note which systems and components were Inspected (I), Not Inspected (NI), Not Present (NP), and/or Deficient (D). General deficiencies include inoperability, material distress, water penetration, damage, deterioration, missing parts, and unsuitable installation. Comments may be provided by the inspector whether or not an item is deemed deficient. The inspector is not required to prioritize or emphasize the importance of one deficiency over another. Some items reported as Deficient may be considered life-safety upgrades to the property. For more information, refer to Texas Real Estate Consumer Notice Concerning Recognized Hazards, form OP-I. This property inspection is not an exhaustive inspection of the structure, systems, or components. The inspection may not reveal all deficiencies. A real estate inspection helps to reduce some of the …
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office The proposed demo at 1508 Pease Rd. Saturday, July 27, 2024 3:07:37 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Sam, We oppose yet another destruction of a home in our historic neighborhood. There is one every six months, ruining the fiber and beauty of our streets and Changing modest large homes , to insane mansions, that greedily take up all the yard area and build big walls around themselves. Please stop this before we are an ugly Dallas or Houston! Thank you, Sheila Fleming and Family 1500 West Lynn 110 Austin tx78703 Sent from my iPad CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-081374; GF-2024-086399 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 3411 HAPPY HOLLOW LANE 27 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolish a contributing garage in a historic district. Main house is a single-story, symmetrical house with Colonial Revival influences. The front gabled entry is bracketed by two narrow columns on each side, with four shuttered windows filling out the front of the house. The contributing garage is located to the right and behind the house where the driveway terminates. It is a wood-frame, single-bay structure with an attached storage space. Whereas the main house is clad in stucco, the garage is covered in wood siding painted to match. RESEARCH Originally occupied by the Smith family, the property at 2411 Happy Hollow Lane has limited listings in local news sources, as well as in fire insurance maps and other historical documents. According to the National Register nomination, the house was built in 1938 and has had minimal alteration over time. The garage appears to have been slightly altered with the attached storage space, but apart from that only minor repairs or upkeep has been done. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of Colonial Revival architecture in the district and in Austin. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the demolition. LOCATION MAP 27 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 27 – 3 Demolition application, 2024
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Fahnestock, Sam PR-2024-081374 GF-2024-086399 3411 Happy Hollow Lane Thursday, August 1, 2024 12:30:51 PM External Email - Exercise Caution To the Historic Landmark Commission Liaison, Re: Review Case Number: PR-2024-081374; GF-2024-086399 for 3411 Happy Hollow Lane This is a response to the notification I received from the City of Austin: I am in favor of the Argust/Rowan’s request to demolish their deteriorating garage. I understand the garage will be replaced by another that will be in character with the house, a contributor to the Old West Austin National Historic District. Thank you, Joyce Basciano 1907 W 34th Street Austin, TX 78703 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024- 046875; GF-2024-058073 10413 SOUTH INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35 28 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Demolish a ca. 1940 house and outbuilding, one ca. 1910 house and outbuilding moved onto the lot in the 1950s, and a ca. 1994 log cabin with various non-historic outbuildings within the bounds of Slaughter Creek Neighborhood Park. The oldest building on the property is a one-story house with an uncommon cross-hipped roof clad in corrugated metal; various historic-era additions have been constructed over the years. It is clad in horizontal wood siding with 2:2 and 1:1 wood windows and several vinyl replacement windows. According to historic aerials and research by PARD, the building appears to have been moved onto the lot during the 1950s and used as a residence by the farm manager. The ca. 1940 house is a rustic Ranch-style dwelling with 6:6 wood windows, an integral covered carport, and a cross-gabled roofline. It is clad in vertical unpainted cedar siding. Its associated outbuilding is a long horizontal structure clad in matching cedar siding with a stone veneer water table and aluminum windows; this structure appears to be a repurposed agricultural building. A secondary barn has since been demolished. The property at 10413 South Interstate Highway 35 was once a rural farmstead on Slaughter Creek owned by the Carrington family. Joe C. Carrington, Sr., was a civic leader whose many occupations included insurance sales and farming. He used the property along Slaughter Creek as grazeland, though he did not reside on the property. He also served as a state senator, president of the Chamber of Commerce, and head of the state prison board. The 117-acre Slaughter Creek farm, acquired by Carrington in 1937,1 appears to have been used not only as agricultural land but also as a gathering space for various organizations; both Joe C. Carrington, Sr. and Dr. Joe C. Carrington, Jr. were leaders in the Boy Scouts of America2. Bettie Jean Bunnell Carrington was born in Graham and raised by her father, County Sheriff Bert Bunnell. She was a talented pianist who received her BA in Music Education from TCU in 1954. She began a 26-year teaching career shortly after graduation while she raised her young children alongside her first husband. Carrington earned her Master of Educational Psychology degree before moving her family to Austin in 1966, where she worked for the …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-021145; GF-2024-043942 7304-06 KNOX LANE 30 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH Relocate an early twentieth century house with 1940s vernacular additions to a lot outside the city limits. The building at 7304 Knox Lane is an eclectic house with early Ranch and vernacular stylistic influences applied to what appears to be an early-twentieth-century vernacular farmhouse. It is one and one-half stories in height, with an L-shaped plan and intersecting partial-width porches. Its compound roofline features deep eaves with cedar shakes at gable ends. Fenestration includes 8:8 wood windows of varying dimensions. The house at Knox Lane and Running Rope Lane, known as 7304 or 7306 Knox, appears to have been constructed in the early twentieth century and augmented heavily by the Knox family in the 1940s. The land was purchased in the 1930s by Mary Lou and Warren Penn Knox. W. P. Knox, the district commissioner for the Boy Scouts of America, turned the property into a day camp for boys called Running Rope Ranch. Knox was a Vermont native who moved to Austin after World War I. After serving as an Army captain in World War II, he became involved in Central Texas outdoor youth activities, including work as the official operator of the Arrowhead Ranch Camp in Kerrville, before opening Running Rope Ranch in the 1940s. The ranch offered riding lessons, hiking and survival training, swimming in the spring-fed pool—the land boasted seven natural springs, which were later identified by Margaret Thomas Knox as a habitat of the threatened Jollyville Plateau salamander1—and other outdoorsmanship training. From 1959 to 1966, legendary Austin horsewoman Ginger Pool taught at the ranch.2 The Knox family operated the day camp for ten years. Knox, noted as “larger than life” in posthumous publications, had eclectic interests. He entertained his pupils by showcasing rope tricks he learned as a rodeo performer after WWI. He was a life member of the Marshall Ford Game Protective Association, volunteered on the Council of the Texas Confederate Home for Men, and taught Sunday school at University United Methodist Church. In later years, James and Margaret Thomas Knox and their children moved to the property. Margaret Knox, Captain W. P. Knox’s daughter-in-law, was the daughter of famed Austin architect Roy L. Thomas. She married aviator and P.O.W. James Knox in 1944. After he retired from the military, the couple moved …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Jack Richards Fahnestock, Sam RE: Knox Ranch Development in NW Hills Monday, June 24, 2024 3:35:06 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Mr. Fahnestock- sign up for this? 1. Is there an upcoming hearing re this project? If so, I would like to attend by phone. Where can I 2. I would like my slightly amended comments to be substituted for my earlier email if possible. Please see below for the amended comments. 3. Will you discuss these questions with me? Possibly what I’m asking for is groundless. Possibly not. I would like the City of Austin to help me rather than a developer explaining the law to me, who obviously has a conflict of interest/is adverse to me on this issue. 4. Is the development plan approved, regardless of whether the home is designated “historic”? I was not given notice of this, or at least it’s been years since I received any notice. Thanks, Jack Richards Jack Richards | Shareholder | Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C. | 512.517.6051 Patent Procurement, Litigation, and Counseling From: Fahnestock, Sam <Sam.Fahnestock@austintexas.gov> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 10:52 AM > To: Jack Richards < Cc: Subject: RE: Knox Ranch Development in NW Hills Hi Mr. Richards, Thank you for writing in – I understand your concerns. I will add your comments to backup for the case so the Commission may review them ahead of the next meeting, and they can take them into consideration when making their decision. You may wish to call the applicant to address your questions. You should have received a notice in the mail about the relocation of the house on the property if you live within 500 feet, which has their contact information on it, but here it is just in case: Ricca Keepers (512) 550-6508 Ricca is just the one relocating the existing house, but she may be able to put you in contact with the developer. I do not have their information, unfortunately, but I hope you’re able to get in contact with the right people to address these issues! Thank you, Sam Fahnestock Planner II | he/him City of Austin | Planning Department P: (512) 974-3393 E: sam.fahnestock@austintexas.gov 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, Texas > From: Jack Richards < Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 8:50 AM To: Fahnestock, Sam …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Champe Fitzhugh Historic Preservation Office; Fahnestock, Sam Jack Richards; Knox Lane Development: July 3 Meeting Wednesday, June 26, 2024 1:38:18 PM Betsy Clements Some people who received this message don't often get email from is important . Learn why this External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern: My name is Champe Fitzhugh, and I live with my wife and our 3 boys at 7221 Running Rope. We are directly across the street from the entrance to the short Knox Lane cul-de- sac which ends at the Knox property. At the July 3 meeting, it is my understanding that Mr. Jimmy Nassour intends to speak. Apparently Mr. Nassour represented that he has had several meetings with nearby residents regarding his plan to redevelop the historic Knox property. If that is the case, and I do not believe it is, those meetings did not involve us, despite our being directly impacted by the proposed plans. The development “plans” continue to experience mission creep. Mr. Nassour now apparently proposes 20 ADUs rather than the original single-family home project. Of course all of his plans have a single entrance and exit, one that involves traffic aimed directly at our home. There is no infrastructure to support the number of vehicles that would involve. There is no accounting for the environmental devastation such a development would entail. This is just a developer, with no regard for anything but his pocketbook, trying to take advantage of a situation. The Knox property is a historical feature of our neighborhood. It is a scarce natural water source for wildlife. It is a singular property in the City of Austin. Allowing someone to callously destroy that, with an indefinite plan, a single entrance and exit onto a quiet residential street (one that would have to provide for, conservatively, the comings and goings of 40 new vehicles) would be to completely disregard the neighborhoods, the citizens, and the many, many children who regularly ride their bikes up and down Running Rope, use it to walk to school (we have a group of about 9 children who walk to Doss every morning), and to permit the creation of health and safety hazards while allowing the destruction of natural resources. No one would benefit from this plan except for Mr. Nassour and his wealthy investors. There have not been ANY meetings regarding 20 ADUs. …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Fahnestock, Sam " " Knox Lane -- Relocation Permit--July 3 Thursday, June 27, 2024 10:34:44 AM ; External Email - Exercise Caution Mr. Fahnestock, Below are my comments for inclusion in the July 3rd Commissioner packet. Also I wish to register to speak by phone. The pertinent registration information is at the end of this email. Dear Members, I object to the proposed relocation permit for the property at 7304 Knox Lane. James E. Jarrett 7301 Running Rope Austin, TX 78731 Comments: My objections about relocation of the Knox house are four-fold. 1. Relocation does not preserve the house which has been the centerpiece of a large part of the nearby Northwest Hills land. This house has been a major landmark for several generations of Northwest Hills families. As a homeowner that can see the dwelling from my property, I can attest that for at least 32 years it has been decorated during the holidays as a gingerbread house. Not only have nearby families come by on foot to view the spectacle but cars often were parked on Knox Lane so that children and their parents could view this special structure. 2. Communication by the developer and his team with neighbors has been abysmal. I know of only two meetings that have occurred: February 2013 and July 2015. Nothing has been shared in 9 years. And while the postponement from the June 5th meeting to this July 3rd meeting supposedly was to allow time for providing residents an opportunity to meet with the developer, he has not reached out to schedule anything with us on Running Rope, the street that will be most affected. At the May 1 Commission meeting, the developer mentioned he had met with someone from the Northwest Austin Civic Association (NWACA). No date was given. Besides this obvious omission, Commission members should know that NWACA traditionally has never become involved as either a proponent or an opponent of proposed new developments in Northwest Hills. 3. 20 ADUs—Nothing has been communicated by either the developer or the City of Austin about this to my knowledge. We do not know if they have been approved, if these 20 ADUs would be in lieu of, or in addition to, the original 13 single family homes proposed. 4. The traffic situation from the original 13 proposed homes would be bad enough. (There are no sidewalks …
June 27, 2024 City of Austin P.O Box 1088 Austin, Tx 78767 Subject Property: 7304 Knox Lane Dear City of Austin, Please see the attached documentation and application for the relocation of 7304 Knox Lane primary residence. In reference, to the attached Exhibits A, B, and C, that support and reveal the owner’s longstanding communication with the current neighborhood. In fact, over the years the petitioner has stayed in close communication with the neighborhood’s Mr. Charlie Galvin and the rest of the NWACA Board, refer to Exhibit B, email communication. On May 1, 2024 during the HLC meeting Mr. Hector Rivero, communicated that as a resident of the neighborhood he was not aware of this project. So, the petitioner postponed being placed on the agenda for June until Mr. Rivero’s questions were answered. After multiple attempts to schedule a time to meet with him and the neighborhood we did not hear back. Yet, the owner has over the years already met with the leadership and has a longstanding relationship with this neighborhood. The owner has kept the NWACA Team up to date and communication is also placed in the newsletter. We are asking the Historic Land commission to grant us the ability to relocate this house and help another family. Please refer to Exhibit A, in reference to the subdivision that was reviewed and processed by the City of Austin Staff and does meet the City of Austin’s code requirements. In Exhibit C, please find the contractor who has signed an affidavit communicating a successful relocation is possible. We look forward to working with you on these lots. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, Ricca Keepers, MUP Keepers Land Planning Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C AFFIDAVIT OF KEVIN WOODWORTH STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TRAVIS § § § BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, a notary public in and for the State of Texas, on this day personally appeared Kevin Woodworth known to me, and who, after being by me duly sworn on oath stated: “My name is Kevin Woodworth, I am over the age of 21 years, I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, which are all true and correct, and am fully competent to make this Affidavit. I am President of Blue Moon Builders. I have contracted with the owner of the property located at 7304 Knox Lane, …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Fahnestock, Sam Re: Knox Lane Development: July 3 Meeting Tuesday, July 2, 2024 12:43:28 PM ; External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern: My name is Christopher Spandikow. My wife, twin 8-year old children, and I live at 7219 Running Rope. I completely agree with Mr Fitzhugh’s assessment provided in his email. I won’t repeat those same points here. Instead, I’ll offer my proof-point. My family also has not been in contact with Mr. Jimmy Nassour even though we live right next to the Fitzhugh and across from the Knox property. I respectfully recommend the committee to not take Mr. Nassour’s word on topics going forward, but would instead suggest that the committee seek proof of all of his claims. Thank you for your consideration and service. Best Regards, Christopher Spandikow Good morning, Mr. Fitzhugh, On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:18 AM Fahnestock, Sam <Sam.Fahnestock@austintexas.gov> wrote: Thank you for writing your concerns. I will upload your comments for the Commission to review ahead of the meeting. Thank you, Sam Fahnestock Planner II | he/him City of Austin | Planning Department P: (512) 974-3393 E: sam.fahnestock@austintexas.gov 6310 Wilhelmina Delco Drive, Austin, Texas > From: Champe Fitzhugh < Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 1:38 PM To: Historic Preservation Office <Preservation@austintexas.gov>; Fahnestock, Sam <Sam.Fahnestock@austintexas.gov> Cc: Jack Richards < Betsy Clements < Subject: Knox Lane Development: July 3 Meeting >; > ; ; ; Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution To whom it may concern: My name is Champe Fitzhugh, and I live with my wife and our 3 boys at 7221 Running Rope. We are directly across the street from the entrance to the short Knox Lane cul-de-sac which ends at the Knox property. At the July 3 meeting, it is my understanding that Mr. Jimmy Nassour intends to speak. Apparently Mr. Nassour represented that he has had several meetings with nearby residents regarding his plan to redevelop the historic Knox property. If that is the case, and I do not believe it is, those meetings did not involve us, despite our being directly impacted by the proposed plans. The development “plans” continue to experience mission creep. Mr. Nassour now apparently proposes 20 ADUs rather than the original single-family home project. Of course all of his plans have …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-065928; GF-2024-073054 3310 BOWMAN AVENUE 31 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1951 house. ARCHITECTURE One- and one-half story eclectic revival house with mansard and flat rooflines, 6:6 symmetrical windows at the main elevation, and a side-entry garage at the basement level. The house is clad in painted stone veneer and shingle siding, with a monolithic chimney and decorative shutters at windows and doors. RESEARCH The house at 3310 Bowman Avenue was designed and built by developer Bob Bowman, advertised as a modern French Provincial residence in the newly platted Tanglewood neighborhood. By 1955, the home had been purchased by Madeleine and Travis LaRue. LaRue, who owned a laundry and dry-cleaning business with his brother, followed in his politically minded father’s footsteps. After serving three terms on the City Council from 1963 to 1969, Travis LaRue was elected mayor of Austin in 1969. He served one term. LaRue’s tenure as mayor and councilman coincided with one of the most turbulent and transformative periods in the twentieth century. He made headlines as a councilmember by opposing a city vote for an improved fair housing ordinance, preferring a longer public process that included realty and development groups in the community outreach process like San Antonio’s similar ordinance. LaRue’s requests for delaying decisions on codification of Civil Rights and push for “voluntary” integration were criticized by Civil Rights activists, but LaRue won the race for mayor in a landslide in 1969. As Mayor, LaRue pledged to lower taxes and run the city more like a business, with efficiency and economy at the forefront. LaRue supported student protests at the University of Texas after the Kent State shootings in 1970 and vowed to end water pollution in the city after his business was cited for releasing dry cleaning effluence into Waller Creek. Despite his 2-1 victory against incumbent Harry Akin in 1969, LaRue lost the mayor’s race in 1971 to school board president and car dealership owner Roy Butler. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is an eclectic example of a modest suburban home with French Provincial …
3310 Bowman Avenue - Materials Repurposing Plan JD Hunt Custom Homes, Inc. (DBA: JD Hunt Homes) 2414 Exposition Blvd. Ste D-210 Austin, TX 78703 To Whom It May Concern, I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Jason Hunt, and I am the President at JD Hunt Homes. We are writing to inform you about an exciting initiative that our company is undertaking with regards to the property located at 3310 Bowman Ave. As part of our commitment to sustainable building practices and reducing our environmental footprint, JD Hunt Homes has decided to repurpose a significant portion of the building materials from the demolition of the house at 3310 Bowman Ave. Our goal is to minimize waste and make use of valuable resources that can be given a new life in future construction projects. Materials Repurposing Plan 1. Salvageable Lumber: We will carefully dismantle and preserve any structurally sound lumber, which will be cleaned, treated, and stored for use in new residential construction. 2. Bricks and Stone: Bricks and stone materials that are in good condition will be salvaged, cleaned, and reused in landscaping or as decorative elements in upcoming projects. 3. Fixtures and Fittings: Usable fixtures such as doors, windows, cabinets, and hardware will be removed and either reused in our new constructions or donated to local charities and non-profit organizations. 4. Metal Components: Metals from plumbing, wiring, and structural elements will be recycled, reducing the need for new raw materials and decreasing environmental impact. Community and Environmental Impact By repurposing these materials, we aim to: ● Reduce Waste: Significantly lower the volume of debris sent to landfills. ● Conserve Resources: Reduce the need for new raw materials and the associated environmental costs of extraction and processing. ● Support Local Communities: Provide quality materials to local organizations and contribute to the sustainability of our community. We believe that these efforts will not only benefit the environment but also set a positive example within the industry for responsible building practices. If you have any questions or A: 2414 Exposition Blvd Ste D-210 Austin, TX | P: 512-866-4642 | E: info@jdhunthomes.com would like to discuss this initiative further, please do not hesitate to contact us at jason@jdhunthomes.com. Thank you for your support and understanding as we undertake this environmentally conscious project. Sincerely, Jason Hunt President JD Hunt Custom Homes, Inc. A: 2414 Exposition Blvd Ste D-210 Austin, TX | …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-079642; GF-2024-086405 2805 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DRIVE 35 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1963 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story brick house with Ranch influences, including turned posts, deep eaves, and large divided windows. The house at 2805 Mountain Laurel Drive was built in 1963 for the Staehley family. Alfred Staehely, Sr. worked as the senior vice president at First Federal Savings and Loan. He joined the firm in 1958 after serving in the Air Force and worked there until his retirement 32 years later. Though Staehely was well-connected in the banking and homebuilding fields, as well as a close friend of Lyndon Johnson’s brother, the family remained in their modest Ranch house through the 1990s. Alfred and Margaret Staehely had two sons, Alfred Jr. and John Staehely, who would grow up to leave their mark on Austin’s music scene as beloved local performers. After gaining notoriety with the psychedelic rock band Spirit, the Staehely brothers moved to Los Angeles in the early 1970s to seek their fortune as musicians. Though John Staehely remained in L.A. to tour with other bands, Alfred Staehely Jr. returned to the house on Mountain Laurel Drive in the late ‘70s to attend the University of Texas School of Law, kicking off a career in entertainment law that would lead him to settle in Houston. After touring as a guitarist with well-known acts in the ‘70s and ‘80s, John Staehely also moved to Houston, where he works as an art dealer. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain moderate integrity. Windows have been replaced. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property is associated with the Staehely brothers, Austin musicians; however, both brothers are still living. Typically, historical associations with individuals are not applied to living occupants. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, …
UMLAUF Historic Preservation, UMLAUF Historic Preservation, Expansion, and Unification Plan Expansion, and Unification Plan Austin Parks and Recreation Department 200 South Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78704 (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:1008)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1006)(cid:1008)(cid:3) (cid:100)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:116)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:258)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:374)(cid:855)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:286)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3) (cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3) (cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:258)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:367)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:449)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3) (cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:282)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:381)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3) (cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:336)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:373)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:381)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:393)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:400) (cid:3) (cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3) (cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:258)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:258)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:393)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:286)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:367)(cid:282)(cid:3) (cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:393)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:460)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:437)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:271)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3) (cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1012)(cid:1009)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1006)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:895)(cid:3) (cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:895)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:882)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:460)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:393)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:271)(cid:381)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:1004)(cid:882)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1013)(cid:1008)(cid:895)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:1009)(cid:882)(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1006)(cid:895)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:853)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1010)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:895)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:361)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:3) (cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:336)(cid:374)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:437)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:393)(cid:437)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:374)(cid:3) (cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:460)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:1012)(cid:882)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3) (cid:28)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:437)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:349)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:410)(cid:882)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:859)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:859)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:282)(cid:282)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:437)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:282)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:395)(cid:437)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:258)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:859)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3) (cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:856)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:60)(cid:349)(cid:373)(cid:271)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:272)(cid:69)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:286)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:455)(cid:3) (cid:296)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:437)(cid:393)(cid:393)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:28)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:271)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:437)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:449)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:393)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) Sincerely, Kimberly A. McNeeley, M. Ed., CPRP, Director Austin Parks and Recreation Department (cid:3) The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. 2 Letter from the Director of PARD Austin Parks and Recreation Department 200 South Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78704 (cid:4)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:1008)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1006)(cid:1008)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:100)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:116)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:258)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:374)(cid:855)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:286)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3) (cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3) (cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:258)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:367)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:449)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3) (cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:282)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:381)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3) (cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:336)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:373)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:381)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:393)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:400) (cid:3) (cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3) (cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:258)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:258)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:393)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:286)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:367)(cid:282)(cid:3) (cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:393)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:460)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:437)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:271)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3) (cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1012)(cid:1009)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1006)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:895)(cid:3) (cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:17)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:895)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:882)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:460)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:393)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:271)(cid:381)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:1004)(cid:882)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1013)(cid:1008)(cid:895)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:1009)(cid:882)(cid:1006)(cid:1004)(cid:1005)(cid:1006)(cid:895)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:853)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:894)(cid:1010)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:895)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:361)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:3) (cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:336)(cid:374)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:282)(cid:437)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:393)(cid:437)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:346)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:1005)(cid:1013)(cid:1013)(cid:1005)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:374)(cid:3) (cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:460)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:1012)(cid:882)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3) (cid:28)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:437)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:349)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:410)(cid:882)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:336)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:859)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:271)(cid:437)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:859)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:282)(cid:282)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:437)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:282)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:286)(cid:395)(cid:437)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:258)(cid:271)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:286)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:272)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:859)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:336)(cid:258)(cid:272)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:336)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:3) (cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:856)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:47)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:60)(cid:349)(cid:373)(cid:271)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:272)(cid:69)(cid:286)(cid:286)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:349)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:286)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:296)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:373)(cid:455)(cid:3) (cid:296)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:400)(cid:437)(cid:393)(cid:393)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:296)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:396)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:28)(cid:454)(cid:393)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:272)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:100)(cid:346)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:393)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:448)(cid:349)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:271)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:296)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:349)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:374)(cid:437)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:367)(cid:367)(cid:381)(cid:449)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:68)(cid:62)(cid:4)(cid:104)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:94)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:393)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:282)(cid:286)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:1085)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:437)(cid:400)(cid:286)(cid:437)(cid:373)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:381)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:367)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:448)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:400)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:373)(cid:373)(cid:437)(cid:374)(cid:349)(cid:410)(cid:455)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:374)(cid:286)(cid:272)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:3)(cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:396)(cid:381)(cid:437)(cid:336)(cid:346)(cid:3)(cid:374)(cid:258)(cid:410)(cid:437)(cid:396)(cid:286)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:272)(cid:381)(cid:374)(cid:410)(cid:286)(cid:373)(cid:393)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:455)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:410)(cid:349)(cid:400)(cid:410)(cid:400)(cid:853)(cid:3)(cid:258)(cid:374)(cid:282)(cid:3) (cid:410)(cid:346)(cid:286)(cid:3)(cid:449)(cid:381)(cid:396)(cid:364)(cid:3)(cid:381)(cid:296)(cid:3)(cid:18)(cid:346)(cid:258)(cid:396)(cid:367)(cid:286)(cid:400)(cid:3)(cid:104)(cid:373)(cid:367)(cid:258)(cid:437)(cid:296)(cid:856)(cid:3)(cid:3) Sincerely, (cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:3) Kimberly A. McNeeley, M. Ed., CPRP, Director Austin Parks and Recreation Department The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Letter from the UMLAUF It has been a tremendous honor to partner with Page and their team on this Historic Preservation, Expansion, and Unification (HPEU) Plan, a critical step toward realizing Charles and Angeline Umlauf’s gift to the City of Austin. Their original 1985 gift was conveyed upon their passing, but recognizing its significance, the community, under the direction of Roberta Crenshaw, came together to open the current garden and museum on adjacent land in 1991. As Austin has grown exponentially over the decades, the imperative to fulfill the original gift and share the entire historic green space with a wider, more diverse public, has also grown. The UMLAUF Board and Staff were moved by the compelling and detailed proposals submitted by ten firms after releasing the RFP in 2023. Ultimately, Page stood out not only for their extraordinarily skilled and integrated team, but for understanding that a revitalized UMLAUF could address some of the myriad challenges facing one of the most rapidly growing cities in the U.S. Not only is Page an esteemed international firm embedded in Austin’s culture for 100 years, their Principal and Design Director, Lawrence Speck, designed the 1991 award- …
Geotechnical APPENDIX | 244 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 245 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 246 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 247 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 248 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 249 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 250 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 251 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 252 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 253 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 254 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 255 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 256 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 257 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 258 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 259 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 260 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 261 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 262 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 263 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 264 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 265 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 266 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Geotechnical APPENDIX | 267 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Fire Truck Maneuvers W W W W W W O E W W W W ] ] ] ] o o ] ] o o O E W W W W ] ] O E W W W W W W O E ] O E ] O H U O E O H U O E O H U O H U 497.26' O E O H U ' 7 4 . U 9 9 4 H O ' 8 . 1 2 0.5' ' 7 . 9 U H O ' ' 7 0 . 2 0 5 : W B 2 7 . 2 0 5 : W T U H O U H O U H O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 8 ' 7 . 8 9 4 TW:498.38' BW:497.76' 15.0' ' 5 . 8 ' 8 6 . 8 9 4 10.0' ' 4 . 7 ' 1 . 0.2'3 ' 4 . 4 ' 6 6 . 8 9 4 27.7' ' 1 6 . 2 0 5 : F F ' 5 . 6 1 ' 8 7.6' 0 . 27.7' ' 1 9 . 2 0 5 : W B ' 5 2 . 3 0 5 : W T ' 1 . 2 …
Guiding Principles These principles guide the planning process, harmonizing Sustainability + Resilience, Legacy, and Community. Recognizing the site’s environmental challenges, Sustainability + Resilience are introduced as core principles, steering the plan’s decision-making. Community envisions an accessible and unified site, expanding the UMLAUF’s reach, and fostering deep connections with Austin’s community. Legacy seeks not only to preserve the historic zone, but to also amplify Charles Umlauf’s artistic heritage, offering art education opportunities for all. The plan honors Umlauf’s legacy by expanding the museum’s reach through new and diverse programs, all while addressing environmental concerns affecting both the sculpture garden and its surroundings. Carefully devised strategies, detailed on the subsequent page, will interlace these principles, ensuring a harmonious integration that preserves the UMLAUF’s essence while guiding it into a sustainable and community-oriented future. Sustainability + Resilience Legacy Community INTRODUCTION | 28 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Plan Objectives Aligned with the Guiding Principles, the plan objectives group a series of main strategies. Ranging from unifying the site to advancing arts education, these objectives serve as a guide for informed decision-making throughout the planning and design process. Each objective encapsulates targeted strategies, ensuring a cohesive approach to the UMLAUF’s vision. Site unification Incorporating the adjacent land that includes the home of Angeline and Charles Umlauf, their private sculpture garden, and the artist’s studio to the site’s experience. Seamlessly unifying the three main areas of the site, creating an accessible site-wide experience. Historic preservation Preserving the Historic Homestead, comprising Umlaufs’ home, studio, and private sculpture garden. Sharing the story of Charles Umlauf and the Umlauf family with the community through an interpretive experience. Sustainability + environmental rehabilitation Managing energy and water responsibly, addressing site issues, and respecting the city’s environment while safeguarding the ecology and biodiversity of the site. Community connection Implementing community-driven planning, and creating spaces that foster a welcoming experience for everyone in the city to enjoy while connecting with art and nature. Arts education expansion Infusing the site with learning and exploration opportunities, making the whole site a learning experience. INTRODUCTION | 29 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Planning Process The planning process matches two main timelines: planning and design, and community engagement. Please refer to the Community Engagement section for more details about the stakeholder engagement sessions. Discovery Exploration Synthesis The Discovery Phase of the plan involved detailed analysis of the physical conditions of the UMLAUF’s site, and initial community engagement efforts, including an …
Survey Results Programming The survey also included questions regarding arts and education programming. For art exhibitions, “More rotating exhibitions of contemporary art and design” was ranked the highest. The plan will consider enhanced and accessible exhibition spaces to provide more options for the public to return to the UMLAUF. Regarding education, “Art classes for adults” were preferred by 77% of respondents, followed by “Ecology, nature, and wildlife programs” chosen by 67.83%. The plan will consider these preferences by proposing spaces for arts and environmental education, both indoors and outdoors, to enrich the UMLAUF’s programmatic offerings. What additional arts exhibitions would you like to see at the UMLAUF? Please rank in order of personal relevance What additional education opportunities would you like to see at the UMLAUF? Please select all that apply 3.03 5.59 Art classes for adults Art classes for children 3.20 Ecology, nature, and wildlife programs 77.05% 51.43% 67.83% 2.79 Interactive installations for children 45.49% More outdoor exhibitions 2.39 Other 6.35% Exhibitions about Umlauf’s life and process More rotating exhibitions of contemporary art and design More rotating exhibitions of local art More permanent exhibitions of the City of Austin’s Charles Umlauf sculpture collection (currently in storage) Other: • Umlauf’s drawings on display • Nature journaling and en plein air classes/groups • Programming for blind/disabled persons • More rotation. We’d love to bring our students more but the feedback we get is they’ve already seen it multiple times already • Would like to ensure that children’s classes are accessible to families with limited financial resources • Multicultural exhibits and programming • Have a meditation space and programs like yoga classes and dance lessons • Art classes for senior citizens • Zoology classes • A focus on sculpture or fine art • Permanent exhibit explaining Umlauf’s life Find full list of comments in appendix COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT | 55 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Survey Results Priorities A ranking exercise followed the introduction to different project areas in previous questions. “Historic preservation of Umlauf’s home and studio” was ranked as top priority, closely followed by “environmental stewardship.” Notably, “more parking spaces” ranked low (sixth of eight options), despite the preference for private vehicle that was expressed in prior mobility questions. This insight guides the plan towards prioritizing preservation, sustainability, education, and public access, while underscoring the importance of balancing transportation options for different needs. As the UMLAUF envisions their future, what is more important …
Existing Buildings Museum Gallery + Terrace Roberta Crenshaw Building Umlauf Home Umlauf Studio Art Pavilion (temporary) Accessible to the public Accessible to the public Currently inaccessible to the public Currently inaccessible to the public Currently inaccessible to the public Year built: 1991 Year built: 2001 Year built: 1950 Year added: 2018 Current uses: • Museum gallery • Lobby + ticketing area • Admin + operations • Terrace for open events • Restrooms • Storage Current uses: • Meeting room • Educational programs • Private restroom Year built: Late 1920’s, purchased by the Umlauf’s in 1944 Current uses: • Admin + operations (in some rooms) • Storage Current uses: • Storage Current uses: • Admin + operations ANALYSIS | 82 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Outdoor Spaces + Landscape Features The community’s feedback highlights a strong preference for the UMLAUF’s outdoor spaces. These areas, including outdoor structures and landscape features, significantly enhance the exploration of the sculpture garden, supporting diverse programs like weddings, public events, and outdoor workshops. Each outdoor space possesses a distinct character that harmoniously blends with the site landscape and contributes to a unique and immersive experience. The site’s water features —an ornamental pond (with pump and lined) and an ornamental waterfall— enhance the outdoor experience and provide thermal comfort in hot weather. However, these water features are currently supplied by potable water. The plan includes sustainability recommendations to switch the supply to non-potable water, aligning sustainability goals with the community’s desire for a nature-centric setting within the UMLAUF site. See more in the Sustainability + Reslience chapter. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Gallery terrace Waterfall/channel (ornamental) Promenade Upper pond (ornamental) Pitts Pavilion Upper Bridge Lower Bridge Pond (ornamental) ANALYSIS | 83 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Outdoor Spaces + Landscape Features 1 Gallery Terrace 2 Waterfall (ornamental) 3 Promenade 4 Upper Pond (ornamental) 5 Pitts Pavilion 6 Upper Bridge 7 Lower Bridge 8 Pond (ornamental) ANALYSIS | 84 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN ANALYSIS | 85 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Slope Analysis The UMLAUF site grapples with challenging topography, featuring slopes ranging from 15 to 60% and smaller areas exceeding 60%. Highly sloped zones, primarily along the boundaries and the historic site near Barton Blvd, pose significant intervention challenges. An extensive orange zone (15 to 60%) creates accessibility hurdles, dividing the historic area from the sculpture garden. This challenges linking the garden with the home and studio. To ensure full accessibility, …
HPEU PLAN | 109 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN HPEU PLAN | 110 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN 05.1 Historic Preservation UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Historic Preservation Introduction This assessment is based on visual observations conducted during a field investigation on July 28, 2023, a review of original architectural drawings by Jessen, Jessen, Millhouse & Greeven dated April 24, 1956, and a review of the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (NPS Form 10-900) prepared by Hutson Gallagher, Inc. and Katie Robinson Edwards, UMLAUF Sculpture Garden + Museum Executive Director and Curator, dated July 30, 2022. The purpose of this assessment report is to document the existing conditions of the home, studio, and garden and to make general recommendations for the restoration of the same, considering programmatic needs and following the guidelines set forth in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Charles and Angie Umlauf purchased their home in 1944. The original structure dates to the late 1920s, and was a one-story, gable-roof structure with limestone walls, a wood-framed pier-and-beam floors and wood roof structure. In 1950, Charles built a studio approximately 100 feet to the east of the house. The studio is a single- story, shed roof structure with slab-on-grade foundation, wood framed walls with wood siding and wood framed roof. In 1956, the Umlauf’s engaged Jessen, Jessen, Millhouse & Greeven to design an addition to enlarge the house. The addition built upon the original stone structure, creating an L-shaped plan with three bedrooms on the main level and a lower level with an additional bedroom, bathroom, and mechanical room. The renovation produced a minimalist aesthetic typical of mid-century, modern design. HISTORIC PRESERVATION | 112 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Secretary of the Interior’s Standards Preservation The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties is the professional standard for the preservation of historic buildings, structures, sites, objects, and districts, established by the Secretary of the Interior under the National Historic Preservation Act. The Standards develop four treatments for addressing historic properties: preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, and reconstruction. The Standards include Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. These Guidelines contain baseline consistencies with specific direction for each treatment approach. Preservation is defined as the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing form, integrity, and materials of a historic property as it has evolved over time. Work, including preliminary measures to …
Mid-Level Planting Recommendations The landscape character of the UMLAUF is intricately linked to a canopy of mature oak and heritage trees, which provide essential ecosystem services to visitors and a diverse array of species year-round. However, there is room for improvement in the existing landscape’s spatial and temporal hierarchy. Introducing shrubs, mid-level, and ground-level plants can transform visitor interactions with the garden while also bolstering biodiversity, controlling erosion, and defining spatial boundaries. For instance, incorporating plant species with seasonal variations can offer dynamic experiences throughout the year. Additionally, remediation of certain areas presents opportunities for re- vegetation using native and diverse alternatives, further enriching the site’s ecological diversity. “Identify all the vegetation species on site and include them in the learning experience.” Sambucus nigra (Elderberry): pollinator plant, habitat and culinary food, historic medicinal and cultural use Capsicum annuum (Chile Pequin): habitat and culinary food, historic medicinal and cultural use Callicarpa americana (American beautyberry): habitat and culinary food, pollinator plant, historic medicinal and cultural use Crataegus opaca (Mayhaw): pollinator plant, historic medicinal and cultural use Malpighia glabra (Barbados Cherry): habitat food, pollinator plant Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (Coralberry): habitat food, nesting habitat Source: www.wildflower.org/ LANDSCAPE | 136 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN 06 Design Guidelines Review and compliance Architectural character Guidelines UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Review and Compliance The UMLAUF HPEU Plan’s design guidelines aim to establish a framework that connects the site’s historical and natural elements with the wider community, expanding the existing offerings. The subsequent sections present guiding principles to prioritize future development for successful interventions. These principles do not offer fixed solutions but encourage flexibility and creativity, aligning with diverse project needs, functions, and budget constraints. As each design challenge lacks a one-size-fits-all solution, these guidelines necessitate careful consideration during the design phase. They require expertise in design disciplines and a deep understanding of the unique context of the UMLAUF. It’s advisable for the Board to engage professionals in architecture or landscape architecture, either by involving them in the committee or seeking their advisory role during the design phases. Their input will be vital for reviewing compliance with these guidelines and ensuring thoughtful design implementation. DESIGN GUIDELINES | 138 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Architectural Character This UMLAUF HPEU Plan aims to create architecture that coincides with the goals of the UMLAUF, while reaching their desires for growth, and complimenting the existing structures and site. The architectural character of new buildings should harmonize with the …
Energy Introduction The UMLAUF’s primary energy objective is to achieve Net Zero Annual Energy, meaning the site generates as much renewable energy as it consumes over a year. The strategy involves initially reducing annual energy usage and then offsetting the remaining consumption by leveraging geo- exchange for heating and cooling while maximizing on-site energy production with solar panels. The careful selection of energy sources is critical, considering that non-renewable options such as coal, natural gas, and propane significantly contribute to air pollution and global warming. Each unit of energy used on-site translates to three units of energy used at the source at coal or propane plants due to losses during conversion and transmission. The UMLAUF has committed to a fully electrified site, eliminating gas, diesel, or propane appliances and systems and providing EV transportation with chargers on-site and places for bikes and human-powered transportation. Despite remaining connected to the grid with a diverse energy portfolio, the UMLAUF is actively reducing its energy consumption and deploying on-site renewables to minimize its environmental footprint. As an option, UMLAUF is to consider enrolling in Austin Energy’s GreenChoice program which is 100% renewable grid energy. This multifaceted approach underscores the UMLAUF’s conscientious efforts to balance operational needs with environmental stewardship. ENERGY | SUSTAINABILITY + RESILIENCE | 163 UMLAUF HPEU PLAN Energy Balance Annual Energy Balance Annual Net Energy Usage Implementing energy production strategies — such as solar, geothermal, and additional reduction tactics — compensates for the energy consumption of new and existing buildings to reach net annual zero The existing and new buildings are predicted to consume 221 MWh per year, which is more energy than 18 homes in Texas. Renewable energy generation from photovoltaic (PV) systems can offset 50% of the total annual energy use of the site. Using geo-exchange wells and ground source heat pumps, reduces an additional 10-20% of site energy consumption. To bridge the remaining gap to net zero annual site energy, existing meter data should be collected with energy audits to evaluate the most effective energy conservation strategies. A comprehensive building performance analysis is recommended to asses aspects such as building orientation, the window-to-wall ratio, the implementation of high performance enclosure, heat pump systems, decoupled ventilation with sensible HVAC systems, and the use of energy-efficient appliances. Integrating these solutions will reduce energy consumption and allow for the PV and geo- exchange systems to offset a larger percentage of the …
Sustainability Glossary the surface temperature of the planet. Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) – the number of metric tons of CO2 emissions with the same global warming potential as one metric ton of another greenhouse gas. Global Warming Potential – measure of how much infrared thermal radiation a greenhouse gas would absorb over a given time frame after it has been added to the atmosphere. Embodied Carbon - the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with the entire life cycle of a building or product, including the extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and construction phase. Included in these calculations are CO2 equivalents of greenhouse gas emissions released from refrigerant leakage. Operational Carbon - the ongoing carbon emissions resulting from building operational energy consumption. Sequestered Carbon - the carbon dioxide that is captured and stored, often through sustainable practices like afforestation or the use of carbon-absorbing materials. environmental impacts of a building or site over the span of its lifetime, considering the impacts of all the materials and energy that goes into making and operating the building over its lifetime through end of life. Greywater – clean wastewater without pathogen contamination or grease (typically collected from baths, sinks, HVAC condensate, etc.). Purple Pipe – City of Austin’s reclaimed water (greywater) pipe system. Geo-exchange System – transfers heat in and out of the soil where the soil is used as a heat sink. Black-Water – contaminated wastewater. Deep Energy Retrofit – the process of installing and/or replacing parts and pieces of an existing building to improve energy efficiency. Rainwater Harvesting – the collection and storage of rainwater from building roofs. ECOLOGY Stormwater – runoff water that does not infiltrate into the soil but flows over land and collects on surfaces. Shrubs and Forbes – mid-level planting that look like bushes. RESILIENCY Permaculture – an approach to land management and settlement that uses principles of permanent planting. It focuses on diverse plant and animal species and multi-layered planting which creates an interdependent resilient ecology. FEMA 500 year Flood Plane – There is a 0.2% annual chance that a flood event could have a depth of less than 1 foot based on computer models and statistical estimates. Pollinators – an animal that moves pollen from flower to flower such that fertilization can occur for propagation of plants. Run-Off – That portion of the precipitation on a drainage area that is discharged from the area in stream channels. Types …
UMLAUF Historic Preservation, Expansion, and Unification Plan Our Mission Cultivating community, curiosity, and connection through nature, contemporary artists, and the work of Charles Umlauf. Charles Umlauf 1910 - 1994 Barton Creek Azie M orton Rd. B a r t o n S p r i n g s R d . Currently inaccessible Barton Blvd. Currently inaccessible Zilker Neighborhood Michael Ray Charles Luis Jiménez Sedrick Huckaby Jennifer Ling Datchuk &Tammie Rubin Historic Homestead Existing Sculpture Garden Existing Museum New Building “The Treehouse” New Building “The Gateway” Natural Zone Historic Preservation Accessibility Art + Education Mobility Community Sustainability TAG sessions Work sessions Public Sessions Community Events Online Survey Design Guidelines Home Studio Home Renovation Studio Home Robert Redford The Treehouse The Treehouse UMLAUF HPEU PLAN HPEU PLAN | 109 The Treehouse UMLAUF HPEU PLAN HPEU PLAN | 108 The Treehouse UMLAUF HPEU PLAN HPEU PLAN | 110 The Treehouse 4,700 sq. feet indoor program, event, and exhibition space Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Garden + Museum Welcome Zone Food truck area Food truck area The Gateway The Gateway The Gateway 1,525 sq. feet indoor program space Natural Zone Phase 1: Existing Facility Projects Phase 2: Historic Preservation Phase 3: Expansion and Unification umlaufsculpture.org/visionplan
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: PR-2024-064274; GF-2024-073040 HLC DATES: July 3, 2024; August 7, 2024 PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: East End Saloon/Eisenbeiser’s; 1500 Club/1500 Beauty and Barber Shop WATERSHED: Boggy Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1500 East 12th Street ZONING CHANGE: CS-MU-NCCD-NP to CS-MU-H-NCCD-NP (Central East Austin NP) COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend historic zoning to Planning Commission and City Council. Otherwise, require a City of Austin Documentation Package before releasing the demolition permit. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture, community value, and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: July 3, 2024 – initiate historic zoning (10-0) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727/kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Davis-Thompson, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods , Preservation Austin, Residents of E 12th St, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Urban Renewal Board of the City of Austin DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey lists the property as eligible for local landmark listing based on historical associations and community value, and individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places for its significance in the area of land development and community planning. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular structure; or represents an architectural curiosity or one-of-a-kind building. The building is a vernacular commercial building, a typology rapidly disappearing in Austin. It was recommended as a preservation priority requiring stabilization in a 2019 letter from the Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods.1 Originally constructed as a two-story store building, occupants constructed one-story rear additions in and outside of the period of significance. It has a hipped roof with a central hipped dormer …
Sandlin Services, LLC P: (806)679-7303 TBPELS Firm # 21356 July 1, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission City of Austin 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Engineer’s Letter of Support for Demolition Permit 1500 E. 12th St. – #2024-064274 PR Dear Historic Landmark Commissioners, As the Professional Engineer, we object to the staff recommendation to initiate Historic Zoning or otherwise require a Documentation Package before releasing the demolition permit. As you will see, the public benefits afforded by demolition of the structure far outweigh the marginal benefits of allowing it to remain, and my justification is based on the following facts: 1. This structure type is not conducive nor available for relocation. Anything other than demolition is a 2. Various Civil Engineering Infrastructure items built around the structure are non-compliant with safety hazard to the community. modern safety driven setbacks. 3. Structure proximity to the adjacent major power infrastructure per National Electric Code as also used by the City of Austin is non-compliant. This is a disaster waiting to happen and the structure cannot remain. 4. The structure’s location related to public Right-Of-Way proves compliant sidewalks and sight distance unfeasible, endangering the safety, health and welfare of the members of the public amongst other conflicts. Due to the considerable risk to the health, safety and welfare of the public, it is our professional duty to inform you of the importance that this demolition plan be approved. Should you have any questions or need anything further at this time, please contact me at (806) 679-7303. Sincerely, Nick Sandlin, P.E. President & Principal TBPELS Firm# 21356 1
July 1, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission City of Austin 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Ownership Letter of Opposition to Staff Recommendation 1500 E. 12th St. – #2024-064274 PR Dear Historic Landmark Commissioners, As the Authorized Agent for the Owner, we hereby object to the Staff recommendation to initiate Historic Designation, Zoning or otherwise require a Documentation Package before releasing the demolition permit for the site located at 1500 E. 12th St for case #2024-064274 PR. Sincerely, Nick Sandlin, P.E. President & Principal TBPELS Firm# 21356 1
OCEAN Trey Salinas and Talia Hill—3 Point Partners Eureka development plans for East 12th Street Summary of Feedback 06.24.2019 We are glad that Eureka is ready to work with the community on appropriate development, both within the Urban Renewal Area and further along the street. Our feedback below regards property within the Urban Renewal Area and the Central East Austin Neighborhood Plan—Blocks 1-9 and 11-17. http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=322262 Development priorities: Historic/cultural preservation; walkable, neighborhood-scaled retail and commercial; and compatible structures and uses that comply with current development controls in place. Historic preservation priorities: I.Q. Hurdle House, Bible Believers Church, and Eisenbeiser/Ministry of Challenge building. We are appreciative of recent efforts to stabilize the I. Q. Hurdle House and hopeful that implementation of a long-term plan for restoration/reuse at 1416 East 12th Street will occur within two years. A new roof may be needed to forestall more deterioration of the Eisenbeiser/Ministry of Challenge building, and please keep in mind that planning documents for East 12th Street may provide leeway for dealing with infrastructure challenges specific to that site. There is a great deal of frustration regarding block-lengths of vacant land owned by Eureka that has not been redeveloped in line with the development priorities described above. Eureka has owned one empty block (Block 2) since 2015. Developing long-vacant parcels versus acquiring more property or demolishing existing housing is the least controversial and potentially most productive way to promote positive change along the street. Robust, transparent and responsive engagement of area stakeholders is critical to a collaborative process. Input should be logged, along with the specific source of the input and that individual’s or organization’s relationship to the Urban Renewal Area. Thank you for clarifying that next steps in the engagement piece of the planning process will occur in August/September. It would be helpful for stakeholders to get a sense at that time of the team’s anticipated planning arc, so that individuals and groups know generally what steps to expect and approximately when they may occur. Timelines and deliverables help build faith in a shared outcome—successful, timely implementation. We agree that a neighborhood-by-neighborhood approach to planning for Eureka’s properties is much better than generating a master plan. We suggest that this planning exercise identify priority sites upon which to focus so that steady, concurrent progress along the entire urban renewal stretch is achieved, rather than serially completing one neighborhood plan process, implementing it and …
CAUSE NO. ------ ST ATE OF TEXAS IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT vs CITY OF AUSTIN SODOSOPA SALMON LP IN TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS § § § § § AFFIDAVIT FOR WARRANT OF ARREST AND DETENTION The undersigned on oath, makes the following statement: Affiant, Inspector Willis Adams #13067, who after being duly sworn by me, Willis Adams has good reason to believe Inspector 21, 2023, Sodosopa Salmon LP did commit the offense 32, fail to obtain Building and does believe of violating that on or about September City Code, § 25-11- Austin Permit. Municipal Court #65113. statement person working who personally is based upon information for the City of Austin Development such offense: The forgoing credible Compliance, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL OF AUSTIN. Salmon LP failed to obtain structure. To wit: Being the owner of the property a building by Inspector Services THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED IN JURISDICTION at 1500 E. 12th Street Bldg. B, Sodosopa of the permanent for work conducted in the interior observed OF THE CITY observed Adams, a permit Willis Department-Code located Services Compliance a code complaint Department-Code the property Willis regarding 7, 2020, Inspector at 1500 E. 12th Adams conducted On August 3, 2020, the City of Austin Development received TX. 78702. On August ommercial property structure, with structural damage, and what appeared to and observed a c Inspector inside work occurring in the dumpsters, parking full of debris, with case notes and photographs. Inspector owner. Inspector Adams could not locate the Travis researched mailing property inspections at 1500 E. notice for the property. and found that Sodasopa Salmon LP, with a is the owner of the Austin TX. 78701-2172, any building Records of 1 108 Lavaca St. STE 110-348 his findings to the property Adams Inspector Bldg. B Austin of said location be • Street Bldg. B. Inspector • Street Bldg. B. • Street an inspection address at 1500 E. 12th 12th Adams sent a code violation Adams documented two, twenty foot roll away of the structure. Adams continued Adams observed lot. Inspector Appraisal to conduct permits staged Central follow up Willis Adams observed the Amanda Database Adams conducted repairs On May 23, 2023, Inspector Street Bldg. B. Inspector Adams searched performed. Inspector On May 24, 2023, Inspector violation and providing certified mail green card was returned violation's notification requirements of Adams observed the Adams sent by certified and did not find a build …
From: To: Subject: Date: Eric Standridge Fahnestock, Sam 1500 East 12th street Tuesday, June 4, 2024 9:32:24 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Hello Sam, My name is Eric and my am a member of the OCEAN, the planning contact team for central east Austin. I drove by this building today and noticed what appears to be active demolition/deconstruction in progress. Upon looking it up it on the city permit search it appears historic was rejected yesterday. I’ll admit I don’t know what that means, but I have been involved in numerous discussion about this building for years, mostly how it’s a demolition by neglect case study. Along with the IQ Hurdle house across the street and the South Gate Lewis house, this intersection has three eligible buildings which is rare in Austin generally. Surely, a 109 year old building identified as worthy of preservation in the east Austin historic survey would at least get a hearing at the landmark commission. Please call me to discuss. Thank you, -eric standridge 512-947-5766 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
From: To: Subject: Date: OCEAN Contact Team Fahnestock, Sam Fwd: Please recommend historic zoning for 1500 E 12th Street Tuesday, July 2, 2024 8:21:07 AM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Thank you for your attention to Item 26. Sincerely, Nate > ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: OCEAN Contact Team < Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:15 AM Subject: Please recommend historic zoning for 1500 E 12th Street To: <BC-Ben.Heimsath@austintexas.gov>, <BC-Witt.Featherston@austintexas.gov>, <bc- juanraymon.rubio@austintexas.gov>, <BC-Raymond.Castillo@austintexas.gov>, <bc- jamie.alvarez@austintexas.gov>, <BC-Trey.McWhorter@austintexas.gov>, <BC- Carl.Larosche@austintexas.gov>, <bc-roxanne.evans@austintexas.gov>, <BC- Tara.Dudley@austintexas.gov>, <BC-Harmony.Grogan@austintexas.gov>, <BC- Kevin.Koch@austintexas.gov> Cc: <sam.fahenstock@austintexas.gov> Dear Chair Heimsath, Vice Chair Featherston and the Historic Landmark Commission: The Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods contact team appreciates staff's research and recommendation that 1500 E 12th Street be designated a historic landmark. We encourage you to elevate that assessment to council with your full support. This structure--known in past lives as the Ministry of Challenge, Eisenbeiser Grocery, Club Fifteen Hundred and Fifteen Hundred Beauty and Barber Shops-- has a long and varied history of adaptive reuse and mixed use dating back to the 1890s, and together with the I.Q. Hurdle House (at 1416) and Southgate-Lewis House (at 1501) comprises a historic anchor at the corner of E 12th and Comal Streets. While the Southgate-Lewis House has become the subject of renewed restoration efforts by the longtime owner, the W.H. Passon Historical Society, sadly, the other two properties have deteriorated and languished under the eight-year tenure of a Dallas holding company's entities called Sodosopa Salmon LP and Poisonous Poinsettia LP. As you may know, that company has amassed scores of properties along and nearby E 12th Street, restoring none and building nothing but fences and parking lots. That should not be the future for a high-profile site which, under decades of African American and German immigrant stewardship, provided groceries, libations, personal services, and even rehabilitation and supportive housing. That should not be the future for properties called out in the 2016 East Austin Historic Survey as eligible for landmark status. E 12th Street needs buildings that testify to its past and invite new waves of vitality and community within them; the street has its fill of clearance, vacancy, temporary uses, fences and parking lots. East 12th needs your courage, commitment and sustained attention to prevail and thrive in the face of indifferent actors who mock its legacy with LPs …
From: To: Subject: Date: Eric Standridge Fahnestock, Sam Re: 1500 East 12th street Tuesday, July 2, 2024 4:16:05 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Hello Sam, Thank you for the staff recommendation and report on this case. I noticed my correspondence below was included in the back up for the case. Can you please add my public comments from the June 5 meeting shared below. Thank you. -eric Good Evening Commisioners, My name is eric standridge and I have spent over half my life as a resident of Distict 1. Thank you for your service to our city and for the opportunity to speak today. I am here today to make you aware of what is happening to 1500 East 12th street, aka the former Eissenbiser grocery & cafe, east end saloon, club fifteen hundred, beauty and barber shop, palladium club, carol’s record shop and the ministry of challenge aka the rarest of rare building typologies in east austin, a century old neighborhood scale hybrid house/corner store on an intersection that include two other landmarked properties, the Southgate lewis house and the IQ Hurdle house. Recommended eligible, for historical associations and community value in multiple historic resource surveys and cited as a preservation priority by the D1 council member. Is it in rough shape, no doubt, you would be to if you were over a hundred years old and subject to a decade of neglect following all your neighbors being torn down and vacant lots becoming the norm. And yet even today this building still stands. The owner of this obvious historic asset has chosen to begin total demolition without an approved permit. Surely, they and their consultants are familiar with the process, having owned the property for over a decade and subject to numerous code compliance cases, and being the owners of the numerous properties on 12th street including the boarded up and vacant landmark IQ Hurdle house across the street. There have been missing windows, dangling fascia and siding and general despair at this property for all of recent memory. This is a case study for demolition by neglect. How is it that the normal process doesn't apply in East Austin? Can we agree applying for a permit is not the same as getting a permit? Preservation, and adaptive reuse are hard, sure, …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Jay Perrett Heimsath, Ben - BC Historic Preservation Office; Ben.Heimsath@austintexas.gov HLC - Item 26 - 1500 E 12th St Wednesday, July 3, 2024 10:46:13 AM Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Chairman Heimsath, I am writing in support of historic zoning for the property located at 1500 E 12th St. This building has tremendous historic significance for the African American and German communities, and is an increasingly rare example of a building that has stood as an important gathering point in our neighborhood for well over a hundred years. As you will note in the report prepared by staff, there is a rich history associated with this building and this location, and it very clearly meets the criteria for landmark status. Please follow the recommendation of staff and the input from neighbors and community members, and ensure that this building is preserved. There are not many chances left to retain such prominent examples of our community's history, and it would be a shame to let another one go. Best, Jay Perrett 404-702-3339 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS AUGUST 7, 2024 PR-2024-014961; GF-2024-030567 ROBERTSON/STUART & MAIR 801 LYDIA STREET 9 – 1 PROPOSAL ARCHITECTURE Demolish a ca. 1914 contributing building. DESIGN STANDARDS One-story bungalow with Craftsman influences, partial width inset porch, horizontal wood siding, and decorative cement stairways. The Robertson/Stuart & Mair Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.2.1.1. Do not alter or remove historic features unless they are deteriorated beyond repair. The proposal demolishes the existing building. Summary The project does not meet the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Robertson/Stuart & Mair Historic District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the demolition request. LOCATION MAP 9 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 9 – 3 9 – 4 Demolition permit application, 2024 Permits 9 – 5 9 – 6
2024-086516 SB 600 Congress - Awning Sign Building ID Address 2024-086522 SB 600 Congress - Wall Sign Directory Note: Duplicate address above door has been removed and will not be part of the final design. Please disregard in all previous renderings. Note: Duplicate address above door has been removed and will not be part of the final design. Please disregard in all previous renderings. EXISTING SIGNAGE IN VICINITY FACE LIT HALO/INDIRECT LIT LARGER SYMBOL = NOTICEABLY LARGER OR BRIGHTER SIGN 600 Congress SIGN PLACEMENT APPROXIMATE DUE TO SPACE LIMITATIONS VIEW OF BUSINESSES DIRECTLY FACING 600 CONGRESS ALL ILLUMINATED Hideout Theatre (exposed neon + face-lit marquee) 7-ELEVEN (externally lit) Royal Blue Grocery (exposed neon) Wild About Music (trough-lit) Joe Koen & Sons Jewelers (exposed neon) Sweet Sensi (halo-lit)
Historic Land Commission 1106 Enfield Road August 7, 2024 Ricca Keepers Demolition Request Subject property is 1106 Enfield Road which we are asking to demolish • Owner Dr. Caryn Carlson has been a Professor of Psychology at the University of Texas for many years • Roof leak/damage, with internal water damage, e.g., paint peeling, mildew and possible mold on walls • Main supporting beam is rotten • A/C not functioning Rear-yard Home was built in 1925 • Fence in backyard has fallen • Sewage line exposed in down backyard • Water leak inside the house with extensive ceiling and beam damage Rear External broken/peeling masonry, very large parts of the external stucco have fallen off the walls Internal walls have extensive cracks Cracks on external concrete/tiles and internal tiles indicating foundation problems Outdated electrical wiring (knob and tube) Galvanized pipes throughout the house Side of House Framing and Structural Concerns Framing and Structural Concerns Framing and Structural Concerns Thank you!
August 2, 2024 RE: 1500 East 12th Street Dear Chair Heimsath, Vice Chair Witt Featherston, and Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, Preservation Austin exists to empower Austinites to shape a more inclusive, resilient, and meaningful community culture through preservation. We write to you today in support of designating 1500 East 12th Street as a City of Austin Historic Landmark for its Architecture, Historic Association, and Community Value. Our support for this case is in alignment with our Underrepresented Heritage Advocacy Priority, which seeks to identify and designate historic sites associated with African Americans, Mexican Americans, Native Americans, the LGBTQIA community, and women. Built between 1889 and 1911, the store at 1500 E. 12th St. traces the diverse heritage of East Austin. The building’s early history reflects the German heritage of Austin and Central Texas – initially constructed by grocer and politician Christian J. Willhem, it was later acquired by Dessau merchants Ernest and Louisa Eisenbeiser, who operated a produce and dry goods store, a saloon, and a restaurant there. In 1950, Black businessman Buford Johnson purchased the building, transforming it into a community hub for East Austin’s African American population during the Jim Crow era. By the mid-1950s, the building housed the Fifteen Hundred Beauty and Barber Shops, as well as Club Fifteen Hundred, a bar and music venue. It later became the home of the Gamma Eta Alpha chapter of the Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity, the oldest fraternity in America to admit Black members. The building is prominently situated at the corner of E. 12th and Comal Streets, directly across from the I.Q. Hurdle and Southgate-Lewis Houses – both landmarks of Austin’s Black heritage – reflecting the greater importance of this intersection to the story of Black East Austin. Preservation Austin wholeheartedly supports the designation of 1500 E. 12th St. as a City of Austin Historic Landmark. We thank you for your consideration of this case and for your service to the City of Austin. Sincerely, Melissa Barry, President
August 6, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission City of Austin 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Engineer’s Letter of Support for Demolition Permit 1500 E. 12th St. – #2024-064274 PR Dear Historic Landmark Commissioners, As the Professional Engineer, we continue to object to the staff recommendation to initiate Historic Zoning or otherwise require a Documentation Package before releasing the demolition permit. As a Professional Engineer (P.E.) with over 12 years of experience in civil engineering in Austin, I have developed extensive expertise in urban redevelopment, infrastructure planning, walkability improvements, etc. I also want to share that not only am I a Professional Engineer who takes his duties seriously, I’m an Austin resident, born here in the 1980s. Based on the previous commissions meeting repeated statements, I heard no concerns related to public safety or most importantly based on the history of structure. The staff’s short presentation was not the focus of the commission. I heard only denial of any safety issues, emotionally based opinions, and attacks on the landowner. This appeared to be based on a single speaker, who focused solely on concerns about the landowner. It was evident to me as a resident, the Historic Landmark Commission aims to block any development of the owner’s property leaving the City of Austin citizens to forever deal with the hazard at this intersection. After performing additional research and listening to at the last hearing, we even more strongly advise that the building presents too many safety hazards to remain. Furthermore, it is undeniable that far more public benefits would be gained by enabling demolition of this structure to advance without delay. Here are facts to further support this recommendation: 1. As the building sits today, presents an unsafe situation. Various Civil Engineering Infrastructure items built around the structure are non-compliant with modern safety driven setbacks. a. We reached out to Austin Energy, which stated the following: “… it does not meet our current standard clearances. We would not permit a new building to be built in that same location. A new building would have to be set back further from our facilities.” That is a direct quote from an email from Austin Energy’s Power System Managing Engineer. b. The structure’s location related to public right-of-way proves compliant sidewalks and sight distance unfeasible, endangering the safety, health and welfare of the members of the public amongst other conflicts. c. These setbacks exist …
August 6, 2024 Historic Landmark Commission City of Austin 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 RE: PR-2024-064274 – 1500 E 12th St Dear Historic Landmark Commissioners, We are writing in response to a letter dated July 2, 2024 to the Commission from Nate Jones, President of the Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods (OCEAN). This letter pertained to the above-named case regarding the property at 1500 E 12th Street, which falls within the bounds of the Davis-Thompson Neighborhood Association (DTNA). DTNA does not support OCEAN’s viewpoint that the property merits historic preservation, and we do not oppose the owner’s request for demolition. In November 2023, DTNA expressed to OCEAN in a meeting that we were not opposed to demolition of this building. OCEAN did not solicit our input prior to drafting their July letter, and we were given only one day to respond to their draft; they ignored our initial feedback. This one instance is indicative of a broader pattern: OCEAN does not effectively represent the opinions or viewpoints of the neighborhoods they purportedly represent. Equitable feedback is not regularly requested from constituent neighborhood associations, and so OCEAN’s “official” viewpoints do not accurately represent those of all East Austin neighborhoods. Regarding the specifics of OCEAN’s letter, we disagree that the existing building has architectural merit, which is defined as exhibiting high quality workmanship or being a quality example of a specific architectural style. Neither of these qualities is presented in the existing structure. The building was in a dilapidated state before the current owner acquired it, and it has remained vacant for decades. One way to honor cultural heritage is to work with the developer of an older property to encourage preference or provide incentives for a culturally sensitive development that engages the East Austin community. Given that the cost to restore the building would be a significant undertaking, we believe such money would be better spent on culturally sensitive design or encouragement of minority business use in a new building. Further, the building is also situated on the site in a way that does not meet the criteria of Austin’s Great Streets Initiative. East 12th Street traffic has increased significantly over the years and will continue to increase as East Austin develops, but the existing building does not allow for safe setbacks for pedestrian use: the building appears to be less than 6 feet from the curb on …
GENERAL NOTES DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS, CONSULT THE OWNER & ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SITE CLEAN UP AND REMOVAL OF ANY AND ALL DEBRIS GENERATED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, MAKING READY FOR ALL SUBSEQUENT SUBCONTRACTORS. 1. ALL WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AS MANDATED BY ALL GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMAIN FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK AS DESCRIBED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. WORK FOUND TO BE NONCOMPLIANT OR IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE REJECTED BY OWNER AND CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THEIR EXPENSE WITH NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS ARE GENERAL IN NATURE AND DESCRIBE INTENT. AS A LIMITED INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, THEY DO NOT DESCRIBE INCLUDE OR ANTICIPATE EVERY CONDITION POSSIBLE EITHER KNOWN/UNKNOWN. CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL REVIEW THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS THOROUGHLY AND MAKE A DETAILED SITE VISIT TO REVIEW EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. ANY INCONSISTENCY, DISCREPANCY, AMBIGUITY, OR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED FOR CLARIFICATION AND RESOLUTION PRIOR TO THE DELIVERY OF ANY BID AND PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK IN QUESTION AND/OR ANY RELATED WORK. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL CAUSE THE CONTRACTOR TO BE INELIGIBLE FOR EXTRAS RELATING TO SUCH MATTERS AND SHALL RELIEVE THE OWNER & ARCHITECT FROM ANY CONSEQUENCES THEREBY ARISING. CONDITIONS NOT DESCRIBED HEREIN SHALL BE ASSUMED TO CONFORM WITH THE INTENT OF THE WORK AND SHALL BE FURTHER CLARIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING THE WORK. THE OWNER & ARCHITECT SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF CORRECTING ANY/ALL WORK AT CONDITIONS THAT WERE NOT FURTHER CLARIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL IN-FIELD EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE BEFORE COMMENCING WORK AND SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS AND/OR IN-FIELD OBSTACLES TO CONSTRUCTION, TO THE OWNER & ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION. IN THE EVENT THAT DRAWINGS MAY CONFLICT WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT, AND THE APPROPRIATE INTENT AND/OR ITEMS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ARCHITECT. OWNER & ARCHITECT SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS AND/OR OBSTACLES TO CONSTRUCTION, THAT ARE NOT FURTHER CLARIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY EXPENSE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE OR NEGLECT TO ACCURATELY INSPECT EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE BORNE …
PROJECTDESCRIPTION: OWNERDESIGNERGENERALCONTRACTOR:SusanM.Parten,P.E. STRUCTURALENGINEER:RobertD.Hammond,P.E.(RDHammondConsultingandEngineering,LLC) FLOORANDROOFTRUSSSTRUCTURALENGINEER:RobertA.Davis,P.E.(AlliedTruss) ThisProjectconsistsofreplacing3-carcarport(demolishedthisyearunderpermit2023-130213BP)withadetached two-storyaddition.Theproposedadditionisatwp-bedroomtwo-bathroomapartmenthavinginteriorsquarefootageof approximately1,306SF.The1994surveyattherightshowsthelocationofthedemolishedcarportattherearSE corneroftheproperty.Theproposednewstructurewillbelocatedinapproximatelythesamelocation,thoughitwillbe furtherfromthepropertylinessoastocomplywithexistingCOAsetbackrequirements.Allwaterandelectricutilitiesto theupstairsapartmentwillbemeteredseparatelyfromtheexistingduplex(nogasservicetothenewbuilding). Inadditiontoaddinga3rdlivingunittotheexistingduplexproperty,thenewproposedstructurewillhavethefollowing featurescontributingtolong-termresilienceandsustainability: (cid:16)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:41)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:30)(cid:3)(cid:25)(cid:180)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:71) resistance(200mph)with2-58"EPSinsulationoneachsideofreinforcedconcretewalls,beneathinteriorandexterior cladding; -Rooftrussesdesignedfor150mphwinds; -MetaldoublestandingseamrooftoacceptfastenersforPVsolarpanels,andforrainwatercaptureandstorage; -HighinsulationR-valueurethane-filledgaragedoorforsummerandwinterweatherprotectionforvehiclesandbuilding pipingplumbing; The1994surveyshowsallcurrentimprovementsandthelocationoftherecentlydemolishedcarport. SHEETINDEX: Sheet1:SitePlan Sheet2:ElevationViews-Proposednewstructure Sheet3:FloorPlanandAestheticElevationViews-Proposednewstructure RoofFramingPlansandDetails HipRoofTrussDetailsandLayoutPlan PLEASENOTE :THESEPLANSHAVEBEENREVISEDSIGNIFICANTLYFROMTHEORIGINALMAY7BUILDING PERMITAPPLICAITONSUBMITTAL.THEORIGINALAPPLICATIONCONSISTEDOFA3-CARGARAGEWITH UPSTAIRSAPARTMENT.THENEWAPPLICATIONALIGNSMUCHBETTERWITHTHECITY'SGOALTO INCREASEHOUSINGUNITSINTHEURBANCOREANDENCOURAGEUSEOFPUBLICTRANSPORTATION. T S E O R N O M T S A E 7 0 7 ABOVE:3-CARCARPORT DEMOLISHEDMARCH2024 UNDERPERMIT 2023-130213BP LEFT:NEWPROPOSED 2-BR2BAPARTMENT. COVERINDEXSHEETANDPROJECTDESCRIPTION COV N T S E O R N O M T S A E 7 0 7 (cid:41)(cid:52)(cid:35)(cid:50)(cid:42)(cid:43)(cid:37)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:37)(cid:35)(cid:46)(cid:39) 1 SITEPLAN
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Questions / concerns about review case #HR 24-072700 Tuesday, August 6, 2024 3:01:23 PM You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Sam, I'm reaching out regarding the Notice of Public Hearing National Register Historic District for review case #HR 24-072700 taking place tomorrow. My husband and I live in the house directly next door, 705 E. Monroe. While neutral about the proposed ADU, we observe that a critical piece of information is missing: a site plan which reflects the proposed ADU and its relationship/spacing to the existing home on the property and surrounding property lines and the street. We have standard concerns about potential negative impacts to surrounding homes. In particular, we note that the land being proposed for the ADU slants downhill to the northwest. Our property / home sits directly downhill, so we are concerned about drainage, as well as safe asbestos management (the architecture description notes the likelihood of asbestos in the 2-story structure). We appreciate the opportunity to provide this feedback, and your service to our community! If you have any questions or guidance, please let me know. Kind regards, Ann Saxton Darcy 705 E. Monroe, Unit A Austin, TX 78704 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Case Number: CV-2024-087824 via Certified Mail #7019 1640 0001 2753 9427 City of Austin P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX, 78767 July 16, 2024 SODOSOPA SALMON LP % 2001 AGENCY CORPORATION 14160 DALLAS PKWY STE 800 DALLAS, TX 75254 RE: 1500 E 12TH ST AUSTIN TX 78702 Locally known as 1500 E 12TH ST AUSTIN TX 78702 Legally described as 106 X 148FT OF BLK 1 OLT 36 DIVISION B Zoned as CS-MU-NCCD-NP Parcel Number 0208090119 Dear SODOSOPA SALMON LP % 2001 AGENCY CORPORATION: The City of Austin Development Services Department investigated the property described above. Austin City Code violations were found that require your immediate attention. A description of the violation(s) and compliance timeframe(s) are provided in the attached violation report. After receipt of this Notice, and until compliance is attained, the Austin City Code prohibits the sale, lease, or transfer of this property unless: You provide the buyer, lessee, or other transferee a copy of this Notice of Violation; and You provide the name and address of the buyer, lessee, or other transferee to the Code Official. For additional information, I can be reached at (512) 974-1958 or Andres.DeLaVera@austintexas.gov. Please reference case number CV-2024-087824. Hours of operation are Monday – Friday, 7:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. If I am unavailable, contact DSD Code Connect line at (512) 974-CODE (2633) or DSDCodeConnect@austintexas.gov. Para obtener más información, llame al (512) 974-1958 o enviar un correo electrónico a Andres.DeLaVera@austintexas.gov. Por favor, consulte caso número CV-2024-087824. El horario de atención es: lunes a viernes, 7:30 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Si no estoy disponible, comuníquese con DSD Code Connect marcando al (512) 974-CODE (2633) o por correo electrónico DSDCodeConnect@austintexas.gov. Sincerely, Andres De La Vera, Code Inspector C City of Austin Development Services Department VIOLATION REPORT Date of Notice: July 16, 2024 Code Officer: Case Number: Property Address: Andres De La Vera CV-2024-087824 1500 E 12TH ST AUSTIN TX 78702 Locally known as 1500 E 12TH ST AUSTIN TX 78702 Zoned as CS-MU-NCCD-NP The items listed below are violations of the Austin City Code, and require your immediate attention. If the violations are not brought into compliance within the timeframes listed in this report, enforcement action may be taken. Timeframes start from the Date of Notice. Violation Type: STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE Austin City Code Section: Vacant structures and land (§301.3) Description of Violation: All vacant structures and premises thereof or vacant …
SITE NOTES: 1. 2. 3. 4. ALL F.F.E. HEIGHTS ARE LISTED ON THE ELEVATIONS. PLEASE LOOK TO THE A3 AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS IN ORDER TO COORDINATE. ALL HEIGHTS ARE ESTIMATIONS BASED ON THE SURVEY. VERIFY ALL HEIGHTS IN FIELD WITH A SURVEYOR AND COORDINATE IF ANY DISCREPANCY IS DISCOVERED. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE SUGGESTIONS ONLY. COORDINATE ALL FINAL UTILITY LOCATIONS AND INSTALLATION TYPE WITH UTILITY CONTRACTORS. FINAL SLAB HEIGHTS ARE BASED ON THE ENGINEERS DRAWINGS. COORDINATE IF ANY DISCREPANCY IS DISCOVERD PRIOR TO FORM WORK BEING INSTALLED. DO NOT POUR SLAB IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY. 5. PRIOR TO SLAB POUR, CONTRACTOR TO WALK PROJECT WITH ELECTRICIAN AND INTERIOR DESINGER TO LOCATE ALL FLOOR OUTLETS, GFCI OUTLETS, AND ANY OTHER ELECTRCIAL REQURIEMENTS FOR ANY AND ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT. LEGEND AC EM GM WM HW w TINU C/A RETEM .CELE GAS METER RETEM RETAW RETAEH RETAW RETAW WASTE WATER POOL EQUIP TNEMPIUQE LOOP )'05( TEERTS ts12 TSAE LAITNEDISER 1 EPYT AOC REP YAWEVIRD STNEMERIUQER " 6 - ' 2 " 6 - ' 2 2'-6" 2'-6" 20'-1 1/2" 3'-0"2'-0" 8'-10" 2'-0"3'-0" E"43'43°97N '28.541 ENIL YTREPORP 1'-0" " 6 - ' 2 P H R I I G M H A R P Y O I N T = 5 9 3 ' - 0 " 5'-11 1/2" 10'-0 1/2" B TINU FFE: 593'-6" (V.I.F. 6" ABOVE HIGHEST POINT OF GRADE ALONG PERIMETER OF SLAB FI EDARGER DNA TAHT OS YRASSECCEN SLAB DOESN'T EXCEED STATED HEIGHT) 5 ' P . U . E . p e r p a t l 6 0 . 0 0 ' N 1 0 ° 2 4 4 7 " W ' P R O P E R T Y L I N E Y R A H P N O I P I M G I R H " 0 3 ' - 9 T = 5 5 ' S E T B A C K ENIL YTREPORP REP )0( OREZ OT TUC EB NAC GNITAR ERIF YB ,'A' ETONTOOF )1(1.203R ELBAT CRI POT LLAW MORF GNIKCOLBERIF GNILLATSNI FOOR EHT FO EDISREDNU EHT OT ETALP YB ,'B' ETONTOOF DNA ,GNIHTAEHS TNEV ELBAG RO TIFFOS GNIYFICEPS .DELLATSNI EB OT TON ERA SGNINEPO ELGNIS GNITSIXE FAMILY ECNEDISER W"43'43°97S '98.541 SITE PLAN PROPOSED 1 24X36 SIZE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" (11X17 SIZE SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0") KCABTES '51 1 5 ' S E T B A C K …
Existing - June 2024 Original & Proposed - ca. 1935 Owners: Architect: 1 David West / Will Klemm 1013 East Ninth Street Austin ,Texas 78702 Emily Little, FAIA 1001 East Eighth Street Austin, Texas 78702 1011 East 9th St. Area Map 2 Site & Roof Plan 1011 East 9th St. North Elevation South Elevation Discovery of wood siding East Elevation West Elevation All photos - July 2024 3 Existing Conditions 1011 East 9th St. Custom Sherwin-Williams Columns, accents, Window Sash - Front House Body of both houses Trim & Front Door Front House Window Sashes & Doors - Back House Existing Proposed Front House Front Elevation Drawings Paint Colors 4 1011 East 9th St. 5 Front House Floor Plan 1011 East 9th St. North Elevation Southwest Elevation All photos - July 2024 Back House - built ca 1949 Concrete block w/ Stucco Exterior, Metal Casement Windows, Original Condition Scope of Work paint only Colors Same as Front House 2 colors only Southeast Elevation 6 1011 East 9th St.
From: To: Subject: Date: Historic Preservation Office Re: signed up to speak against 1607 Kenwood but I was passed oveR!!!!! Wednesday, August 7, 2024 9:27:58 PM External Email - Exercise Caution Had I had the opportunity to speak, I would have said: I am VP of the SRCC Neighborhood Organization, which encompasses the subject property. The subject property is a contributing structure to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register Historic District. The original structure was modified dramatically in negation of its historical elements and this modification was done without a permit. I realize the owner says she didn’t know a permit was required but I can’t imagine that anyone expects to build in an urban area without a permit. Certainly her contractor would have known about permitting requirements but somehow worked without a permit without consequence. Regardless, her variances were, for reasons unknown to me, granted. Now she has a new request: to add an addition to the side of the original structure. Despite her representation that she has been down a long road trying to learn her way through a maze of permitting requirements, this is the first time this request for an addition has come before you. It fails to meet several of the City’s Historic Design Standards, including set-back from main structure, subordinate to original structure, emphasizing separate roof design from original structure, cladding is not historically compatible and windows are not historically compatible, either. We strongly urge you to deny this request. Commitments to minimize damage to the original structure have not been completed. Further, the fencing (items 22-6, photos 3-5) is ghastly—of various media and heights-- and apparently designed to hide the work occurring inside, Imagine how adjoining neighbors must feel! And the set- backs from houses on either side appear inadequate. We believe the proper course of action is to deny the request at this time and require submission of an addition design that meets City Historic Design Standards. As submitted, this is not an addition consistent with a historical structure but merely an expansion of the existing structure from a 2/1 to a 3/2 with no differentiation between the historic structure and the addition. This applicant has not earned the trust of the Commission or the neighborhood and should be required to submit a compliant design. Thank you. > On Aug 7, 2024, at 9:11 PM, Historic Preservation Office <Preservation@austintexas.gov> wrote: > > …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, August 7th, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x x ab x x x Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley APPROVED MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Meghan King spoke on Preservation Austin updates. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 3, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. 1 (August 7, 2024) HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Zoning Applications Item 2 was pulled for discussion. Item 3 was pulled for discussion. Item 4 was pulled for discussion. Item 5 was pulled for discussion. 6. PR-2024-026690 – 900 Spence St. Council District 3 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: Katherine Warren City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Grant the applicant’s postponement request to the September 4, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to September 4, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner Heimsath seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. 7. 9037 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail Council District 9 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the September 4, 2024 meeting per Code limits on historic zoning applications. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to September 4, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on …
