ITEM05 C15-2024-0040 PRESENTATION PART3 — original pdf
ITEM05/17-PRESENTATION ITEM05/18-PRESENTATION ITEM05/19-PRESENTATION
Board of Adjustment Homepage
Upcoming meetings
Regular Meeting of the Board of Adjustment - Hybrid meeting: Some board members may be participating by videoconference-http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live
ITEM05 C15-2024-0040 PRESENTATION PART4 — original pdf
ITEM05/20-PRESENTATION ITEM05/21-PRESENTATION ITEM05/22-PRESENTATION Character of the Area – S. 1st Corridor 23 ITEM05/23-PRESENTATION
ITEM05 C15-2024-0040 PRESENTATION PART5 — original pdf
ITEM05/24-PRESENTATION ITEM05/25-PRESENTATION ITEM05/26-PRESENTATION ITEM05/27-PRESENTATION ITEM05/28-PRESENTATION Equitable Transit Oriented Development The purpose of the equitable transit-oriented development (ETOD) combining district is to enhance transit-supportive uses, encourage more intentional and equitable land stewardship with increased bicycle, pedestrian, and transit connectivity, housing options and opportunities, public realm activation, and new economic opportunities near public transit. §25-2-182(A). 29 ITEM05/29-PRESENTATION
ITEM05 C15-2024-0040 PRESENTATION PART6 — original pdf
ITEM05/30-PRESENTATION ITEM05/31-PRESENTATION Request We respectfully request your approval of the request for a variance of the following Equitable Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) compatibility requirements set forth in LDC §25-2-654(H): 1. 2. (3) that requires any structure that is located less than 50 feet from any part of a triggering property may not exceed 60 feet. (3) that requires any structure that is located less than 2’-4 27/32” to 5’-6” (varies) from any part of a triggering property may not exceed 60 feet. (4)(a) that requires a compatibility buffer width of 25 feet from a triggering property. (4)(a) that requires a compatibility buffer width of 2’-4 27/32” to 5’-6” (varies) from a triggering property. 32 ITEM05/32-PRESENTATION 33 ITEM05/33-PRESENTATION ITEM05/34-PRESENTATION ITEM05/35-PRESENTATION Possible Zoning Approach From: GR-V-ETOD-DBETOD and GR-ETOD-DBETOD To: MF-6 (Multifamily Residence Highest Density) To: DB-90 (Density Bonus 90) - Affordable Units Required - Ground Floor Commercial Required - Site Specific Amendment per § 25-2-1054 - BOA Variance request for 25’ Buffer instead of BOA Variance Request - No Commercial Required - No Affordable Housing Required - Does not meet intent of the zoning district 3636 ITEM05/36-PRESENTATION Property Details Size: • 0.519-acres total Current Use: • Vacant Transit/Access: • Core Transit Corridor – S. 1st Street • CapMetro Bus • Route 10 along S. 1st Street • Route 105 along S. 5th Street • Routes 1, 486, 108 along S. Congress 37 ITEM05/37-PRESENTATION Project Details Unit Count: • 118 Units Commercial Space: • 6,722 SF – Ground Floor Retail & Restaurant Parking: • 84 spaces provided • 0.7 Parking Ratio • 9 bicycle spaces (within S. 1st Right-of-Way) 38 ITEM05/38-PRESENTATION
ITEM07 C15-2024-0042 PRESENTATION — original pdf
2003 Arpdale Street BOA Presentation NOVEMBER 2024 ITEM07/1-PRESENTATION Variance Summary § 25-2-492 – Decrease the minimum side setback from 5 ft to 4 ft § 25-2-773 - Decrease the minimum lot size from 5,750 square feet to 5,500 square feet - Decrease the minimum rear setback from 10 ft to 5.5 ft Below is a site plan of the building which has been in its current form since the early 1990’s 2 ITEM07/2-PRESENTATION Unique Circumstances and Characteristics Reliance on TCAD • Owner relied on TCAD when purchasing the home. • TCAD reports the site area as 5,752.90 sf 3 ITEM07/3-PRESENTATION Unique Circumstances and Characteristics Minor Reduction in Lot Size Converted in 1990’s • Most properties in the subdivision were platted in the forties or fifties at 6,000 square feet or more, and so they were unaffected when the minimum lot size of 5750 sf went into effect. It appears, however, that sometime after the house and garage were built, a portion of this lot was sold. The resulting deficiency was not recognized until about 5 years ago. This circumstance is unique within this area. • Not all lots in the area have a structure built in 1949 that was converted to an accessory dwelling in the early 1990’s. Poor Record Keeping and Enforcement • Poor construction record keeping and poor permit enforcement results in the owner inheriting an unpermitted accessory dwelling Setbacks have been in place since 1949 • The structure and foundation have been in place since 1949, so the setback can not change. 4 ITEM07/4-PRESENTATION Support for Approval Neighborhood Support (verified by signatures) • Over 80% of the owners within 300 ft are in support of the variance • No recorded problems or complaints • Neighbors felt like this variance is a non-issue since this request involves an existing structure already being used as an ADU. • They do not feel like this ADU should be subject to regulations intended to limit the amount of new construction and conversions in the area. 5 ITEM07/5-PRESENTATION Support for Approval No History of Issues • No complaints against the house or ADU have been recorded for over 64 years • Verified by open record request Existing Structure Increases Affordable Housing Stock • Site has been in its current configuration for over 30 years • Several other houses in the Rabb Inwood subdivision have ADU’s • Adding this to the housing stock …
Agenda — original pdf
SPECIAL CALLED MEETING of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT November 14, 2024 AT 5:30PM Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required email for elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-2202. remote participation by telephone. To remotely, register speak to ___ Bianca A Medina-Leal ___ Brian Poteet ___ Margaret Shahrestani ___ Janel Venzant ___ Michael Von Ohlen ___ Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: ___Jessica Cohen (Chair) ___Melissa Hawthorne (Vice-Chair)) ___Thomas Ates ___Jeffery Bowen ___Marcel Gutierrez-Garza ___Yung-ju Kim The Board of Adjustment may go into closed session to receive advice from legal counsel regarding any item on this agenda (Private consultation with legal counsel – Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code). AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on October 14, 2024. On-Line Link: Draft Minutes for October 14, 2024 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases. Previous Postponed cases: 2. C15-2024-0028 Peterson 1406 S 3rd Street Haim Joseph Mahlof (Green Bay Remodeling, Inc.) for Wendy Jo 3. On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to attach a second story deck in a “SF-4A-NP”, Single- Family - Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Plan). C15-2024-0031 Victoria Haase for Austin Area School for Dyslexics, Inc. 2615 ½ Hillview Road 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations): Height Requirements to increase the height from 35 feet (maximum On-Line Link: ITEM03 ADV PACKET PART1, PART2, PART3; The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section: …
ITEM02 C15-2024-0028 LATE BACKUP NOV14_OPPOSITION — original pdf
Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association November 6, 2024 RE: Board of Adjustments Public Hearing - Nov 14, 2024 ITEM02: C15-2024-0028, Project Address: 1406 S 3rd St. (District 9) Variance Request: decrease the minimum front yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested). The Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association (BCNA) recommends that the applicant utilize setback averaging to determine if a variance is needed. The BCNA zoning committee met with the applicant on October 14, 2024, to discuss the case and provided our feedback to the applicant. Setback Averaging is described under § Title 25, Chapter 25-2, Subchapter F, Article 2, 2.3 FRONT YARD SETBACK The BCNA has considered the applicant's case and supports the use of setback averaging to accomplish the decrease in the minimum front yard setback requested by the applicant. Sincerely, President Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Association, P.O. Box 3683, Austin, Texas 78764 ITEM02/1-LATE BACKUP
ITEM04 C16-2024-0002 LATE BACKUP NOV14_PP REQ — original pdf
ITEM04/1-LATE BACKUP
ITEM05 C15-2024-0040 LATE BACKUP NOV14_OPPOSITION — original pdf
ITEM05/1-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/2-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/3-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/4-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/5-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/6-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/7-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/8-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/9-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/10-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/11-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/12-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/13-LATE BACKUP ITEM05/14-LATE BACKUP 2. Reasonable Use: The applicant then builds on top of their unfounded hardship claim to say that the “unique” property has an “irregular shape” and is “exceptionally narrow,” and thus deprives the owner of “reasonable use”. Please reference the above reasoning on how the property is neither an irregular shape nor is it exceptionally narrow. Again, the owner knowledgably purchased this standard-size Cumberland property alongside the two S 1st properties for his development. This, yet again, is a self-imposed limitation the owner was aware of when purchasing and designing his commercial development. 3. Area Character: In responding to the area character criterion, the applicant does not adequately address how their 118 unit, 87 foot tall multifamily design may actually impact the neighborhood. If the Board grants the variances, the extended height, added volume of units, lack of parking per unit, and proximity to single-family homes will have a very clear negative impact on the single-family neighbors. The applicant makes two main claims regarding this criterion: a) that there are other multifamily developments along S 1st, and b) there are other commercial buildings with less than 25 foot rear setbacks in the area. In addressing a), the applicant is correct that there are multifamily developments along S 1st, but it is important to note that those developments are all 5 levels or fewer. They appear to maintain the 60 foot code-required setback height from the single-family homes in the area. As for b), there are several commercial businesses in the area which impinge on the 25 foot rear setback, however, all of those businesses are one level or less. Their impact on the adjacent single-family homes is minimal due to their low height. The setback proposed is far too close to 2613 S 2nd St and other adjacent houses and without the proper setback, drainage and potential flooding is a concern. The proposed development will be so tall it will tower over the single-family homes on S 2nd and S 3rd Streets and “diminish privacy”. The added units provided by the added height will “increase traffic on adjacent streets,” and the lack of parking per unit will certainly make S 2nd St, S 3rd St, and Stacy Ln the de facto 24h/7days/week permanent …
ITEM06 C15-2024-0041 LATE BACKUP NOV14_SUPPORT — original pdf
ITEM06/1-LATE BACKUP Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum November 13, 2024 RE: C15-2024-0041 – Thomas M. Schiefer and Meghann Elena Rosales – 1607 West 10th St.- Agenda Item 6 Dear Chair Cohen and BOA Members, I hope this letter finds you well. The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association supports the variance request to allow an increase in impervious coverage at 1607 W 10th Street. This property has been historically designated through the City as the Mary Baylor House and it reflects the dedication the owners have put into preserving its history. Thomas and Meghann, the owners, rebuilt this home with their own hands, along with the help of friends and the local community—no contractors, no professionals—just them, much like the original construction of the house itself. The goal with the proposed addition is simple and in line with the ongoing commitment to both the history of the home and the OWANA neighborhood. The intent is to build a small rectangular extension off the back of the house that mirrors the width and height of the original structure. This design will ensure that the addition does not take away from or overwhelm the original house, preserving the character and historical significance of the property. Importantly, none of the original house will be altered or demolished, except for a minor adjustment to the back eaves. The materials will be complementary to the original style, ensuring the extension blends seamlessly without replicating the original architecture. The requested variance is for an increase in impervious coverage, from the current 45% to 58%. This increase is necessary due to a few unique hardships tied to the history of the property and recent changes in zoning regulations: 1. Deed History: A portion of the property was dedicated to the City in the past to expand the road, which reduced our total allowable building area. 2. Neighbor Encroachment: Portions of the neighbor's property encroach onto the lot, effectively taking approximately 202 square feet from the total allowable building area, further restricting the space for the proposed extension. 3. Zoning Amendments: The Home 2 zoning amendments recently enacted removed the need for a variance in setbacks and building cover, but unfortunately, these amendments now limit the impervious cover to just 45%. OWANA’s neighborhood plan, which …
ITEM07 C15-2024-0042 LATE BACKUP NOV14_OPPOSITION — original pdf
ITEM07/1-LATE BACKUP_OPPOSITION ITEM07/2-LATE BACKUP_OPPOSITION November 8, 2024 To: Board of Adjustment, City of Austin Re: Case C15-2024-0042 (2003 Arpdale), Nov. 14, 2024, Agenda item 7 Dear Chair and Board Members, On August 9, 2021, the Board of Adjustment granted a lot-size variance at 2003 Arpdale, the same variance being requested today. The hearing in 2021 followed the administrative resolution of years of work-without-permit issues and code violations, including confirmation that the accessory structure does not require variances from the side and rear setbacks. Since the 2021 variance, several permits have been issued at this address, and some of them are still active. Unless the applicant can show that a department director has reversed the previous decisions or somehow overturned the Board of Adjustment variance, there is no reason to rehear the case. In short, the applicant has not been denied reasonable use. to submit a formal appeal of a written administrative decision or to challenge the department’s code interpretation. Simply re-applying for a variance that has already been granted makes no sense. Perhaps the Board can postpone the case and request clarification from the department director. size variance granted in August 2021; the first, on page 3, is from myself on behalf of the Zilker Neighborhood Association, and the other, on page 6, is from Jeff Jack, a former member of the Board of Adjustment. To summarize, regarding the setbacks: City of Austin, clarifying that a side yard setback variance is not required at 2003 Arpdale. In 2019 I received the following e-mail from Susan Barr, the residential plans examiner for the Attached are two letters explaining the intricacies of this case and the justification for the lot- If the department director has reversed the previous decisions, the applicant’s remedy would be From: Barr, Susan [mailto:Susan.Barr@austintexas.gov] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 9:54 AM To: latherton Cc: Dave Piper; 'Jeff Jack'; Gonzales, Rodney Subject: RE: 2003 Arpdale Appeal of BP #17-074166 Dear Ms. Atherton, Please keep me posted on the results of the Zilker Neighborhood Association discussion. In regards to the side yard setback, structures that were permitted in the distant past that do not meet current yard setbacks are considered legal, non-complying. Since a permit for the garage was found, it’s distance of 4.4’ from the side property line is legal and does not require a special exception. Best Regards, Susan It was also determined that no variance is required …
ITEM07 C15-2024-0042 LATE BACKUP NOV14_SUPPORT — original pdf
ITEM07/1-LATE BACKUP_SUPPORT
Play video — original link
Play video
Approved Minutes — original pdf
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPECIAL CALLED MEETING MINUTES Thursday, November 14, 2024 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Special called meeting on Thursday, November 14, 2024, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Jessica Cohen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:31 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jessica Cohen-Chair Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Thomas Ates, Jeffery Bowen, Bianca A. Medina-Leal, , Brian Poteet, Maggie Shahrestani, Janel Venzant Board Members/Commissioners Absent Melissa Hawthorne-Vice Chair, Yung-ju Kim, Michael Von Ohlen PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on October 14, 2024. On-Line Link: Draft Minutes for October 14, 2024 The minutes from the meeting October 14, 2024, were approved on Chair’s Jessica Cohen motion, Board member Janel Venzant second, No Objections. PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases. Postponement requests to December 9, 2024: Items 2-10 postponed to December 9, 2024 due to the absence of a sufficient number of Board Members required for a formal vote on each case Chair Jessia Cohen motion to postponement Items 2-10 to December 9, 2024; Board member Janel Venzant second on 8-0 votes; ITEMS 2-10 POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 9, 2024. PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases. Previous Postponed cases: 2. C15-2024-0028 Peterson 1406 S 3rd Street Haim Joseph Mahlof (Green Bay Remodeling, Inc.) for Wendy Jo 3. On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-779 (Small Lot Single-Family Residential Use) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum front yard setback from 15 feet (required) to 5 feet (requested) in order to attach a second story deck in a “SF-4A-NP”, Single- Family - Neighborhood Plan zoning district (Bouldin Creek Neighborhood Plan). Postponed to December 9, 2024 due to the absence of a sufficient number of Board Members required for a formal vote on each case C15-2024-0031 Victoria Haase for Austin Area School for Dyslexics, Inc. 2615 ½ Hillview Road 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations): On-Line Link: ITEM03 ADV PACKET PART1, PART2, PART3; The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the …
ITEM01 DRAFT MINUTES FOR SEPT9 — original pdf
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, September 9, 2024 The BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT convened in a Regular meeting on Monday, September 9, 2024, at 301 West 2nd Street in Austin, Texas. Chair Jessica Cohen called the Board of Adjustment Meeting to order at 5:45 PM. Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance in-Person: Jessica Cohen-Chair, Melissa Hawthorne-Vice Chair, Janel Venzant, Michael Von Ohlen, Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) Board Members/Commissioners in Attendance Remotely: Thomas Ates, Yung-ju Kim, Brian Poteet, Maggie Shahrestani Board Member/Commissioners absent: Jeffery Bowen, Bianca A. Medina-Leal, Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (resigned) PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on August 12, 2024. On-Line Link: Draft Minutes for August 12, 2024 The minutes from the meeting August 12, 2024, were approved on Vice Chair’s Melissa Hawthorne motion, Board member Michael Von Ohlen second on a 9-0 vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS Discussion and action on the following cases. Previous Postponed cases: 2. C15-2024-0024 Christi Lane 2104 Westover Road On-Line Link: ITEM02 ADV PACKET PART1, PART2; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting the following variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-899 (Fences as Accessory Uses) to increase the height from eight (8) feet (maximum allowed) to twelve (12) feet (requested), in order to erect a fence on the east property line in a “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family-Neighborhood Plan zoning district (West Austin Neighborhood Group). Note: The Land Development Code 25-2-899 Fences as Accessory Uses (A) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a fence: (1) is permitted as an accessory use in any zoning district; and (2) must comply with the requirements of this section. (B) In this section: (1) an ornamental fence is a fence with an open design that has a ratio of solid material to open space of not more than one to four; and (2) a solid fence is a fence other than an ornamental fence. (C) The height restrictions of this section do not apply to an ornamental fence. (D) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a solid fence constructed along a property line may not exceed a height of six feet measured from the natural grade up. (E) If …
ITEM02 C15-2024-0025 ADV PACKET APEAL1 PART1 — original pdf
BOA INTERPRETATION APPEAL COVERSHEET RE-CONSIDERATION ITEM02/1- APPEAL1 CASE: C15-2024-0025 BOA DATE: October 14th, 2024 ADDRESS: 6708 Bridge Hill Cv COUNCIL DISTRICT: 10 OWNER: Christi S. May APPELLANT: Warren Konkel APPELLANT’S AGENT: Nicholl Wade ZONING: SF-3 / LA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 5 BRIDGE HILL SUBD APPEAL REQUEST: an appeal challenging staff decision regarding impervious cover approved with building permit 2023-129658BP & 2023-129659BP. SUMMARY: any proposed development must comply with the provisions of the LDC ISSUES: errors on permit application, does not remedy unpermitted construction from 2014 and 2021, vastly exceeds the “grandfathered original construction” IC allowance of 11,408 sq. ft. ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-2 / LA SF-2 / LA SF-2 / LA SF-2 LA Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Lake Austin NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District BRNA ASSOCIATION INC. City of Rollingwood Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Glenlake Neighborhood Association Save Our Springs Alliance TNR BCP – Travis County Natural Resources The Creek at Riverbend Neighborhood Association ITEM02/2- APPEAL1 CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Interpretation Appeal 1 and Appeal 2 Decision Sheet ITEM05 DATE: September 9, 2024 CASE NUMBER: C15-2024-0025 ___Y____Thomas Ates (D1) ___-____Bianca A Medina-Leal (D2) OUT ___Y____Jessica Cohen (D3) ___Y____Yung-ju Kim (D4) ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne (D5) ___-____Jeffery Bowen (D6) OUT ___Y____Janel Venzant (D7) ___N____Margaret Shahrestani (D8) ___Y____Brian Poteet (D9) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen (D10) ___-____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (M) RESIGNED ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) ___Y____Suzanne Valentine (Alternate) (M) ___-____VACANT (Alternate) (M) APPELLANT’S AGENT: Nicholl Wade APPELLANT: Warren Konkel OWNER: Christy May ADDRESS: 6708 BRIDGE HILL CV SUMMARY OF APPEAL: Appellant challenges issuance of Building Permit 2023-12958 BP on the grounds that the City incorrectly approved impervious cover (IC) of approximately 12,811 square feet, which exceeds IC limitations applicable within the Lake Austin (LA) zoning district. BOARD’S DECISION: Aug 12, 2024 - POSTPONED TO September 9, 2024, DUE TO NOT HAVING ENOUGH BOARD MEMBERS FOR VOTING PURPOSES; September 9, 2024 The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen’s motion to deny the appeal request and uphold staff’s decision; Board member Brian Poteet second on 8-1 votes (Board member Maggie Shahrestani nay); APPEAL REQUEST DENIED AND UPHELD STAFF’S DECISION. RENOTIFICATION-SUMMARY OF APPEAL: Appellant challenges issuance of: Building Permit 2023-129658 BP and ITEM02/3- APPEAL1 Building Permit 2023-129659BP on the grounds that the City of Austin incorrectly approved impervious cover (IC) of approximately 12,811 square feet, which exceeds IC limitations applicable within the Lake Austin (LA) …
ITEM02 C15-2024-0025 ADV PACKET APPEAL1 PART2 — original pdf
ITEM02/90- APPEAL1 ITEM02/98- APPEAL1 6708 Bridge Hill Cove LOT 5 BRIDGE HILL SUBD LA 129078 43,554.50 3 Removal of the existing pool and patio space and construction of a new pool, pool cabana, and covered patio space 5 ITEM02/99- APPEAL1 4.0 5.0 5 0 400,000 400,000 3,321.00 1,909.00 532.00 640.50 6,402.50 73.00 0.00 0.00 741.00 0.00 741.00 0.00 1,482.00 0.00 3,321.00 1,909.00 0.00 741.00 532.00 1,381.50 0.00 0.00 7,884.50 73.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,376.50 12.30 13,647.00 31.33 25 2 2 3 ITEM02/100- APPEAL1 12.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Christy May 6708 Bridge Hill Cove ITEM02/101- APPEAL1 Urban Building Services of Texas LLC 214 Sailors Run, lakeway TX 78734 Urban Building Services of Texas LLC Urban Building Services of Texas LLC 214 Sailors Run, lakeway TX 78734 214 Sailors Run, lakeway TX 78734 ( ( ( jon@ubstx.com jon@ubstx.com Christy May 05/18/2023 05/18/2023 05/18/2023 05/18/2023 ITEM02/102- APPEAL1 Residential New Construction and Addition Permit Application Additional Information ITEM02/103- APPEAL1 ITEM02/104- APPEAL1 3,321.00 1,909.00 0.00 0.00 532.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 741.00 782.50 741.00 6,544.50 1,482.00 4,635.50 7,002.00 259.00 533.00 0.00 12,429.50 73.00 0.00 741.00 0.00 476.50 1,217.50 1,217.50 0.00 0.00 3,321.00 1,909.00 0.00 741.00 532.00 0.00 0.00 1,523.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,026.50 5,376.50 7,002.00 259.00 533.00 0.00 0.00 476.50 13,647.00 73.00 0.00 43,554.50 4,635.50 5,376.50 12,429.50 13,647.00 10.50 12.30 28.50 31.33 ITEM02/105- APPEAL1 ITEM02/107- APPEAL1 ITEM02/128- APPEAL1 ITEM02/129- APPEAL1 ITEM02/130- APPEAL1
ITEM02 C15-2024-0025 ADV PACKET APPEAL1 PART3 — original pdf
ITEM02/131- APPEAL1 ITEM02/132- APPEAL1 ITEM02/133- APPEAL1 ITEM02/134- APPEAL1 ITEM02/136- APPEAL1 ITEM02/140- APPEAL1 ITEM02/141- APPEAL1 ITEM02/142- APPEAL1 ITEM02/143- APPEAL1 ITEM02/144- APPEAL1 ITEM02/145- APPEAL1 ITEM02/146- APPEAL1 ITEM02/147- APPEAL1 ITEM02/148- APPEAL1 City of Austin Development Services Department P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78767 VESTED RIGHTS DETERMINATION Findings This determination is made under City Code 25-1-541 in response to a claim that the project identified below is vested to earlier regulations and entitled to be reviewed under those regulations. The determination may be reconsidered once at the request of the applicant. Project Name: Pool/Cabana Reconstruction Address: 6708 Bridge Hill Cove Case No. VR-2024-0037000 Date of Application: 6/4/2024 nation: 6/12/2024 Date of Determination: 6/12/2024 Signature: ____________________________________________________________ Date: _______________ _______________________________ 6/12/2024 See Grounds for Determination (reverse) for a summary of the most common grounds for approval or denial. Additional grounds may also apply. Determination (reverse) for a summ (X) DENIED (X) DENIED (X) DENIED Primary Grounds: PROJECT COMPLETE Primary Grounds: PROJECT COMPLETE Findings: The project initiated with the submittal of the Bridge Hill Subdivision plat for this lot, Findings: The project initiated with the submittal of the Bridge Hill Subdivision plat for this lot, was completed with the construction of the residence authorized by building permit 1987- was completed with the construction of the residence authorized by building permit 1987- 010020-BP and accessory swimming pool authorized by building permit 1989-006985-BP. The 010020-BP and accessory swimming pool authorized by building permit 1989-006985-BP. The proposed application is redevelopment of existing permitting and unpermitted improvements proposed application is redevelopment of existing permitting and unpermitted improvements and is considered a new project. and is considered a new project. ITEM02/149- APPEAL1 City of Austin Development Services Department P.O. Box 1088, Austin, Texas 78767 FINDINGS ON RECONSIDERATION OF VESTED RIGHTS DETERMINATION N/A Project Name: 6708 Bridge Hill Cove Address: BP (Building Permit) No. 2023-129658 Case No.: Application Date: June 4, 2024 Determination Date: July 19, 2024 Determination by: Brent Lloyd DSD Development Officer (X) APPROVED Vesting Date: N/A Findings & Conclusions: 1. On June 4, 2024, applicant submitted a petition for vested rights claiming that proposed development under the above-referenced building permit was entitled to review under regulations in effect on the date the 1981 plat application was filed, as modified by the Planning Commission’s subsequent conditions of approval. 2. On June 12, 2024, DSD denied the vested rights claim on the grounds that: “The project initiated with the submittal of the …
ITEM02 C15-2024-0025 ADV PACKET APPEAL2 PART1 — original pdf
BOA INTERPRETATION APPEAL COVERSHEET RE-CONSIDERATION ITEM02/1-APPEAL2 CASE: C15-2024-0025 BOA DATE: October 14th, 2024 ADDRESS: 6708 Bridge Hill Cv COUNCIL DISTRICT: OWNER: Christi S. May APPELLANT: Warren Konkel APPELLANT’S AGENT: Nicholl Wade ZONING: SF-3 / LA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APPEAL REQUEST: an appeal challenging staff decision regarding impervious cover approved with building permit 2023-129658BP & 2023-129659BP. SUMMARY: any proposed development must comply with the provisions of the LDC ISSUES: errors on permit application, does not remedy unpermitted construction from 2014 and 2021, vastly exceeds the “grandfathered original construction” IC allowance of 11,408 sq. ft. ZONING LAND USES Site North South East West SF-2 / LA SF-2 / LA SF-2 / LA SF-2 LA Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family Lake Austin NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District BRNA ASSOCIATION INC. City of Rollingwood Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Glenlake Neighborhood Association Save Our Springs Alliance TNR BCP – Travis County Natural Resources The Creek at Riverbend Neighborhood Association ITEM02/2-APPEAL2 ITEM02/3-APPEAL2 Diana Ramirez for ITEM02/4-APPEAL2 ITEM02/5-APPEAL2 ITEM02/6-APPEAL2 ITEM02/7-APPEAL2 ITEM02/9-APPEAL2 ITEM02/10-APPEAL2 ITEM02/11-APPEAL2 ITEM02/12-APPEAL2 ITEM02/13-APPEAL2 ITEM02/14-APPEAL2 ITEM02/15-APPEAL2 ITEM02/16-APPEAL2 ITEM02/17-APPEAL2 ITEM02/18-APPEAL2 ITEM02/19-APPEAL2 ITEM02/20-APPEAL2 ITEM02/21-APPEAL2 ITEM02/22-APPEAL2 ITEM02/23-APPEAL2 ITEM02/24-APPEAL2 ITEM02/25-APPEAL2 ITEM02/26-APPEAL2 ITEM02/27-APPEAL2 ITEM02/28-APPEAL2 ITEM02/29-APPEAL2 ITEM02/30-APPEAL2 ITEM02/31-APPEAL2 ITEM02/32-APPEAL2 ITEM02/33-APPEAL2 ITEM02/34-APPEAL2 ITEM02/35-APPEAL2 ITEM02/36-APPEAL2 ITEM02/37-APPEAL2 ITEM02/38-APPEAL2 ITEM02/39-APPEAL2 2 L A E P P A / - 0 4 2 0 M E T I ITEM02/41-APPEAL2 2 L A E P P A / - 2 4 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 3 4 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 4 4 2 0 M E T I ITEM02/45-APPEAL2 ITEM02/46-APPEAL2 ITEM02/47-APPEAL2 ITEM02/48-APPEAL2 ITEM02/49-APPEAL2 ITEM02/50-APPEAL2 2 L A E P P A / - 1 5 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 2 5 2 0 M E T I ITEM02/57-APPEAL2 ITEM02/53-APPEAL2 ITEM02/54-APPEAL2
ITEM02 C15-2024-0025 ADV PACKET APPEAL2 PART2 — original pdf
2 L A E P P A / - 6 5 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 7 5 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 8 5 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 9 5 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 0 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 1 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 2 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 3 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 4 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 5 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 6 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 7 6 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 8 6 2 0 M E T I ITEM02/69-APPEAL2 ITEM02/70-APPEAL2 ITEM02/71-APPEAL2 ITEM02/72-APPEAL2 ITEM02/73-APPEAL2 ITEM02/74-APPEAL2 ITEM02/75-APPEAL2 ITEM02/76-APPEAL2 ITEM02/77-APPEAL2 ITEM02/78-APPEAL2 ITEM02/79-APPEAL2 ITEM02/80-APPEAL2 ITEM02/81-APPEAL2 ITEM02/82-APPEAL2 ITEM02/83-APPEAL2 ITEM02/84-APPEAL2 ITEM02/85-APPEAL2 ITEM02/86-APPEAL2 ITEM02/87-APPEAL2 ITEM02/88-APPEAL2 ITEM02/89-APPEAL2 ITEM02/90-APPEAL2 ITEM02/91-APPEAL2 ITEM02/92-APPEAL2 ITEM02/93-APPEAL2 ITEM02/94-APPEAL2 ITEM02/95-APPEAL2 ITEM02/96-APPEAL2 2 L A E P P A / - 7 9 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 8 9 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 9 9 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 0 0 1 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 1 0 1 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 2 0 1 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 3 0 1 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 4 0 1 2 0 M E T I 2 L A E P P A / - 5 …