ITEM 9 C15-2022-0061 ADV PACKET PART2 — original pdf
Backup
Board of Adjustment Homepage
ITEM 9 C15-2022-0061 ADV PACKET PART3 — original pdf
Previously Denied BOA case C15-2020-0020 $ $ $ $ SC $ $ Stack W+D $$ $$ $$ $$ SC $ $ Stack W+D $ $ $ $ $ FIXTURE LEGEND. Ceiling fan w/o light kit Pendant light $ Wall switch Ceiling-mounted light Duplex outlet Recessed can light GFCI duplex outlet Vanity light Waterproof GFCI duplex outlet Hot+cold water tap S C Smoke detector CO2 detector Thermostat Hose bibb Gas tap W/H Gas tankless water heater Ceiling fan w/ light kit Exterior wall-mounted light 220V outlet Undercounter lighting EM Electric meter Exhaust fan GENERAL MEP NOTES. 1. Switches and thermostats on all floors shall be located no greater than 45" (@ junction-box centerline) above finish floor level. Power receptacles and data ports on all floors shall be located no less than 18" (@ junction-box centerline) above finish floor level. Final locations of lighting and outlets to be coordinated in field with Owner. Final switching to be coordinated in field with Owner. 2. 3. 4. 1 MEP Plan, Bldg 1, Level 02 Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" @ 11x17 Scale 1/4" = 1'-0" @ 24x36 SEAL OF ARCHITECT. SEAL OF MUNICIPAL APPROVAL. DISCLAIMERS. issued under the seal of is This document WILLIAM LAWRENCE HODGE, Texas architect #19074. This document is not for permitting, regulatory approval, pricing or construction unless the seal and signature of the Architect are This document is not approved for visible. construction unless a seal of municipal approval is visible. No set of construction documents can contain all information required to construct a is project. required. That which is shown in one sheet, applies to all sheets in this set by reference. The information in G001 through G009 (inclusive) apply to every sheet in this set and to every that may contractor and/or subcontractor perform work on this project. Unless this set contains the cover sheet and all sheets listed thereon, this set is incomplete and INVALID FOR CONSTRUCTION. Interpretation by a contractor ISSUE DATE 21 May 2020 W I L L I A M H O D G E A I A A R C H I T E C T 4 8 0 1 S C O N G R E S S A V E # N 3 A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 4 5 5 1 2 . 7 8 6 . 9 2 9 8 H O D …
ITEM 3 C16-2022-0005 AE REPORT — original pdf
August 31, 2022 Jaden Rodriguez 5213 Tucker Hill Ln Cedar Creek, TX 78602 Re: C16-2022-0005 Property Description: ABS 797 SUR 5 WESTBROOK T B ACR 9.8026 Dear Jaden, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-10-130 at 7712 Elroy Road. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that the proposed sign follows Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria (15’ radial clearance from any existing overhead or underground electric facilities), the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881 Cody.Shook@austinenergy.com
ITEM 3 C16-2022-0005 PRESENTATION — original pdf
New Elroy Road entrance sign Item 3/1-PRESENTATION One • Our current entrance sign is easily lost from the distance. As we continue to develop our main entrance, with focus moving to Elroy Road due to the expansion of lanes, we need this entrance to be clear and identifiable. • Using a 40ft tall double sided sign, our guests will be able to find our entrance without issues. View of intersection toward East View of intersection toward West Item 3/2-PRESENTATION Two A 30ft sign would put the screen too close in proximity to the intersection. The sign has a large video element and could cause distractions if installed this low. Item 3/3-PRESENTATION Three • With the recent lane expansion, Elroy Road will become a new main entrance, likely becoming more utilized than our 812 entrance. This will help alleviate the traffic issues we have seen in the past. Having this entrance be as identifiable as possible will help that mission. • The entrance sign is an important identifier of the property as well as a tool that communicates to our neighbors and attendees about events and activities happening on property. It is important that this sign is the correct size and scale and clearly visible – especially as it pertains to traffic updates and traffic control. Item 3/4-PRESENTATION Thank you for your consideration. We understand the rules and regulations, and feel that raising the height of the sign is not a substantial deviation from the current allowance. We look forward to the positive impact this sign will have. Item 3/5-PRESENTATION
ITEM 4 C15-2022-0065 AE REPORT — original pdf
August 31, 2022 Daniel Strinden 1700 Loreto Dr Austin TX, 78721 Re: C15-2022-0065 Property Description: LOT 14 BLK A OLT 24 DIV B MCKINLEY HEIGHTS TERRACE Dear Daniel, Austin Energy (AE) has reviewed your application for the above referenced property, requesting that the Board of Adjustment consider a variance request from LDC Section 25-2-515 at 1700 Loreto Drive. Austin Energy does not oppose the request, provided that any proposed or existing improvements follow Austin Energy’s Clearance & Safety Criteria, the National Electric Safety Code, and OSHA requirements. Any removal or relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner’s/applicant’s expense. FYI: The second dwelling unit proposed on this lot will be required to meet 15’ radial clearance from the overhead electric distribution lines adjacent to Tillery Street. Please use this link to be advised of our clearance and safety requirements which are additional conditions of the above review action: https://library.municode.com/tx/austin/codes/utilities_criteria_manual?nodeId=S1AUENDECR_1 .10.0CLSARE If you require further information or have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact our office. Thank you for contacting Austin Energy. Cody Shook, Planner II Austin Energy Public Involvement | Real Estate Services 2500 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741 (512) 322-6881 Cody.Shook@austinenergy.com
ITEM 4 C15-2022-0065 PRESENTATION — original pdf
Key Messages Case Number: C15-2022-0065 Applicant/Owner: Daniel Strinden Address: 1700 Loreto Dr. Austin, TX 78721 • Desire to build Accessory Dwelling Unit under Two Family Residential Use – Intended use is to house family who retired this year and since moved out of Austin due to cost of living & reduced income • Current Zoning SF-3-NP, which allows for Two-Family Residential Use • Property is a through lot with streets and setbacks on 3 sides, which poses a unique hardship. Most other through- lots only have setbacks on two sides. • We have no architectural plans yet, because it would be infeasible to pursue building without the variance. 1111 Item 4/1-PRESENTATION 1700 Loreto Drive, Through Lot Rear Yard Setback Variance Request 15’ (required) to 25’ (requested) This is the property under consideration 22 Item 4/2-PRESENTATION Property Under Consideration Versus Typical Lots (Uniqueness of the hardship) 1. Overwhelming majority of lots are not through-lots 2. Most through lots only have 2 setbacks Property under consideration 33 Item 4/3-PRESENTATION Current view of rear yard Emerson Confidential 44 Item 4/4-PRESENTATION Survey with proposed setback change 15’ rear yard setback 25’ rear yard setback 55 Item 4/5-PRESENTATION Proposed site area overlaid onto survey 50’ Dwelling 20’ 20’ Drive/ Carpark 15’ 20’ 50’ 15’ rear yard setback 25’ rear yard setback 66 Item 4/6-PRESENTATION
ITEM 5 C15-2022-0002 PRESENTATION — original pdf
PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK " 0 - ' 5 1 25'-0" 25'-0" BUILDABLE AREA A= 13,803 sq ft K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I E N I L Y T R E P O R P E N I L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S T N O R F G N N O Z E S A B I K C A B T E S T N O R F Y T I L I B T A P M O C I 15'-0" PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK 25'-0" K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I E N I L Y T R E P O R P 2 5'- 0 " 1 5'- 0 " BUILDABLE AREA A= 13,354 sq ft COMPATIBILITY REAR SETBACK 2 5'- 0 " PROPERTY LINE K C A B T E T S N O R E P O R P E K C A B RTY LIN T E T S N O R G F NIN O E Z S A B ATIBILITY F P M O C K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I E N I L Y T R E P O R P T E E R T S E P U L A D A U G 3 1 4 5 1 5 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A P L D G 1220 Lavaca Street Tuesday, August 23, 2022 SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 SIDE SETBACK 25'-0" PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 PROPERTY AREA = 27,873 SF PROPERTY AREA = 27,873 SF TYPICAL MF-4 PROPERTY SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1 5413 GUADALUPE ST SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 2 N A01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS: COMPATIBILITY DIAGRAMS Item 5/1-PRESENTATION 1 0'- 6 " LOT 22 SF-3 ZONING LOT 23 BLOCK 1 LOT 24 BLOCK 1 55TH STREET 9'-11" " 0 - ' 6 2 " 2 / 1 5 - ' 0 0 1 17'-9" " 0 …
ITEM 6 C15-2022-0043 PRESENTATION — original pdf
The Plan 38th Street 509 E 38th Street Case #C15-2022-0043 Eric Goff L i b e r t y S t r e e t • Original lot (outlined in green) is 14,027 SF corner lot with a 1954 home on it. Home is in good condition. • Subdividing into Lot 1 and Lot 2 • New Lots: • Lot 1: faces and has driveway access to 38th Street, is 8,230 SF, and contains the existing 1954 house • Lot 2: has access on Liberty street. 5,770 SF . Has 50 ft of frontage (minimum allowed by code). Plan is to build a home on this lot Item 6/1-PRESENTATION The Variance 38th Street 509 E 38th Street Case #C15-2022-0043 Eric Goff L i b e r t y S t r e e t • Lot 2 (the new lot) does not need any variances, it meets code. • Lot 1 (with existing house) • Due placement of the existing house, we need a 1 foot variance to the set back requirement. • The house needs a 10 ft set back, but is 8 inches too far toward the back of the lot. Item 6/2-PRESENTATION The Findings 509 E 38th Street Case #C15-2022-0043 Eric Goff Required Findings: (A) reasonable use: A subdivision would require the demolition of the existing 1954 house that is representative of the character and scale of the area. (B) Hardship unique to property and not general: The Property includes an existing 1954 house that is typical for the area and worth preserving. The placement of the house by 8 inches presents a challenge that not all area lots share. (C) Adjacent Property: a one foot variance to the setback will not impair the use of any surrounding properties Item 6/3-PRESENTATION 509 E 38th Street Case #C15-2022-0043 Eric Goff The Potential Outcomes If variance is granted: The Variance will allow the new house to stay as is. If variance is not granted: Without the variance, the house will have to be demolished before the subdivision can be approved. See back up materials for a letter from COA Subdivision official that says the variance or demolition is needed before subdivision can be approved Item 6/4-PRESENTATION The House Built in 1954 509 E 38th Street Case #C15-2022-0043 Eric Goff Item 6/5-PRESENTATION Preservation Austin 509 E 38th Street Case #C15-2022-0043 Eric Goff July 27 – the Advocacy Committee of Preservation …
ITEM 7 C15-2022-0046 PRESENTATION — original pdf
1101 Quaker Ridge Variance Request Item 7/1-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge • Case: C15-2022-046 • Owners: Jeffery and Leslie Socha • Presented by: Ricca Keepers, Keepers Land Planning and Permitting Item 7/2-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge • The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code Section 25-2-492 (Site Development Regulations) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum Street Side Yard Setback from 15 feet (required) to 10 feet (requested), in order to erect an addition above the garage in a “SF-2”, Single-Family zoning district. • Variance is requested for the following reasons • Large, 19” Red Oak in the backyard, see attached tree survey and arborist’s, prohibits building any structure in the backyard • The house backs up to a beautiful walking trail and park. The owner’s are hoping to avoid obscuring the view to the park by building over the garage. • Current house is two stories, proposed addition would b e no higher than the current height of the house • House is on a corner lot, corner lot setbacks are significantly different than that of an interior lot resulting in less area in back a n d side yard to build on Item 7/3-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Pictures Front of the house, showing garage and current height Item 7/4-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Picture Side of house and garage leading up to the park in the back of the house Item 7/5-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Entire garage shown, as well as height of current house. Item 7/6-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Showing the fence in the back of the property, including the park and walking trail that is behind the house. You can also see the 19” Red Oak that prohibits building in the back Item 7/7-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Arial view of the property to include the park and waking trails. Development in the backyard would obstruct the current view of the park. Item 7/8-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Survey Item 7/9-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge You c a n see from this image, the backyard leaves little room for an addition due to additional setbacks and protected trees. Specifically, the tree on the corner in the backyard further prevents construction in the backyard. Item 7/10-PRESENTATION 1101 Quaker Ridge Arborist’s Report showing tree noted on survey in the back of the house, 19” Red Oak, noted in ” G o o d Condition” Item 7/11-PRESENTATION Proposed Plans Item 7/12-PRESENTATION …
ITEM 8 C15-2022-0060 PRESENTATION — original pdf
2-story Duplex 2-story Duplex Church Property – Community Garden Land Use Map 1-story Duplex SUBJECT SITE 2-story Duplex Commercial Warehouse & Office Single Family Industrial Warehouse & Outdoor Storage Commercial – Radio Tower Single Family 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/1-PRESENTATION Single Family 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/2-PRESENTATION Reasonable Use – 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/3-PRESENTATION Reasonable Use – 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/4-PRESENTATION Basis for Variance Request Reasonable Use of the property is impeded 1. Compatibility Regulations – Inappropriately applied 2. Hardships: • 4 Heritage Trees • Critical Water Quality Zone • Public Utility Easements Impact: significant amount of buildable area lost 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/5-PRESENTATION Annexation & Compatibility Annexation: November 1984 LDC Code Amendment – effective January 1985: 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/6-PRESENTATION 1984 Aerial 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/7-PRESENTATION 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/8-PRESENTATION Site Constraints 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/9-PRESENTATION 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/10-PRESENTATION 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/11-PRESENTATION 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/12-PRESENTATION 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/13-PRESENTATION 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/14-PRESENTATION 6ft of topographic change 1609 Matthews Lane – C15-2022-0060 City of Austin – Board of Adjustment – September 12, 2022 Item 8/15-PRESENTATION
BOA Agenda Sept 12, 2022 — original pdf
1. REGULAR MEETING of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT September 12, 2022 AT 5:30PM Austin City Hall, Council Chambers, Room 1001 301 West 2nd Street, Austin, Texas 78701 Some members of the BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for email elaine.ramirez@austintexas.gov or call 512-974-2202. remote participation by telephone. To remotely, register speak to CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: ___Thomas Ates ___Brooke Bailey ___Jessica Cohen (Chair) ___Melissa Hawthorne (Vice Chair) ___Barbara Mcarthur ___Darryl Pruett ___Agustina Rodriguez ___Richard Smith ___Michael Von Ohlen ___Nicholl Wade ___Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (4) four speakers signed up/register prior (no later than noon the day before the meeting) to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve the minutes of the Board of Adjustment Regular meeting on August 8, 2022. On-Line Link: Draft minutes August 8, 2022 PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Discussion of staff and applicant requests for postponement and withdrawal of public hearing cases posted on the agenda. New Sign cases: 3. C16-2022-0005 Jaden Rodriguez for Leo Garcia 7712 Elroy Road On-Line Link: Item-3; AE REPORT; PRESENTATION The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-130 (Commercial Sign District Regulations) (G) (1) from sign height of 30 feet above frontage street pavement grade (maximum allowed) to 40 feet (requested) above frontage street pavement grade in order to provide signage for The Circuit of the Americas in a “PUD”, Planned Unit Development zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-130 Commercial Sign District Regulations. (A) This section applies to a commercial sign district.(B) One Freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Additional freestanding signs may be permitted under Section 25-10-131 (Additional Freestanding Signs Permitted). (G) The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (1) 30 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (2) 6 feet above grade at the base of the sign. New Variance cases: 4. C15-2022-0065 Daniel Strinden 1700 …
ITEM 4 C15-2022-0065 LATE BACKUP SEPT 12 - IN OPPOSITION — original pdf
From: *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. Sent from my iPhone From: To: Subject: Date: Ramirez, Elaine Notice of public hearing land Development Wednesday, September 07, 2022 6:13:58 PM This message is from Chevale Ross. [ chevalejanuary55@gmail.com ] # c15-2022-0065, Location:1700 Loreto Drive, ( I object) nothing on this side of town is not affordable determine Affordable y'all just raising taxes because it's not low income.
ITEM 5 C15-2022-0002 LATE BACKUP SEPT 12 - IN OPPOSITION — original pdf
From: To: Subject: Date: Nick Fritz Ramirez, Elaine C15-2022-0002 Friday, September 02, 2022 9:52:22 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Elaine, hope your weekend went well. im reaching out again b/c i got a notification via letter about them trying to build a condominium… again across the street from my house. Case Number: C15-2022-0002 a) i, nicholas fritz am against Marek Hnizda / Guadalupe Heights LLC (Lacman Patil) trying to increase the height Limit from two stories and 30 feet(maximum allowed) to 3 stories in 30 feet(requested) for a building location 50 feet or less from property in and SF–5 or more restricted zoning district. b) i, nicholas fritz am against Marek Hnizda / Guadalupe Heights LLC (Lacman Patil) trying toIncrease height limitations to increase the highest limits from three stories and 40 feet(maximum allowed) to 4 stories and 40 feet (requested) and “SECTION 25-2-1064 (Front Setback): c) i, nicholas fritz am against Marek Hnizda / Guadalupe Heights LLC (Lacman Patil) trying to decrease the front setback from 25 feet (minimum required) to 15 feet (requested) on a tract that adjoins property in an SF–5 or more restricted zoning district and fronts on the same street in order to erect a Multi-Family building in a “MF-4-CO”, Multi–Family Residence Moderate- High Density–Conditional Overlay Zoning district. again, don’t want a condominium across the street from my house nor do i or anyone around me think it’s a good idea for the neighborhood. The area of the condominium is going to be built is already a high traffic area and will cause great deals of traffic with construction and without construction. Don’t forget about the kids that live around the area as well making an unsafe environment for more cars speeding around the corner. please let me know if you have any questions nick CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. From: To: Subject: Date: Mark Foohey Ramirez, Elaine Case Number: C15-2022-0002 Monday, September 05, 2022 12:55:13 PM *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Ramirez, I am writing in regards to case number C15-2022-0002 regarding a proposed zoning change to be heard by the Board of Adjustment on 9/12/22. I own a property within …
ITEM 5 C15-2022-0002 LATE BACKUP SEPT 12 - IN SUPPORT — original pdf
North Loop Neighborhood Association Board of Adjustment 301 W. 2nd St. Austin, TX 78701 Subject: North Loop Neighborhood Association and proposed development at 5413 Guadalupe To the Members of the Board of Adjustments this afternoon, the 9th of September 2022. My name is Brian Bedrosian and I am currently serving as the Vice President of the North Loop Neighborhood Association (NLNA), a post I have held since 2019. I am writing this letter on behalf of the NLNA to provide some insight into the neighborhood’s past positions on projects such as that being proposed by Webber Studio and their clients that might help to inform how the NA would vote once we are able to properly consider the project. Marek Hnizda reached out to me regarding this project and we met over Zoom to discuss the proposed variance to the setback along Guadalupe along with their proposed project and what it might look like. We were not able to bring this in front of the neighbors for a formal vote prior to your meeting on the evening of the 12th of this month – so my comments here are simply an idea of our values and how we have responded to similar proposals. In general, our neighbors have tended to vote in favor of projects that show a considered investment in quality housing within our neighborhood with a focus on affordability, family-oriented units where possible, sustainability and increased density. Our neighborhood plan has sought to support a more urban feel to our neighborhood that aspires to provide space for a more diverse and inclusive community of people in the rapidly heated market that Austin finds itself in. With this in mind, the project per the current proposal is within the parameters of something we might support. As you may recall we were recently in front of the Board in support of a much larger VMU project at 201 East Koenig Lane at the southeast corner of Koenig and Avenue F. That particular developer worked closely with our neighborhood and PARD to create a project that served the needs of the developer, the aspirations of the neighborhood and the mission set forth by PARD’s Parkland Dedication Ordinance. We strongly encourage Webber Studio and their clients to continue to engage our neighborhood throughout the design process to seek a similarly mutually beneficial design. While I am unable to provide an official neighborhood …
ITEM 5 C15-2022-0002 LATE BACKUP SEPT 12 -UPDATED BUILDABLE AREA SITE PLAN — original pdf
PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK " 0 - ' 5 1 25'-0" 25'-0" BUILDABLE AREA A= 13,803 sq ft K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I I E N L Y T R E P O R P I E N L Y T R E P O R P K C A B T E S T N O R F G N N O Z E S A B I K C A B T E S T N O R F Y T I L I B T A P M O C I 15'-0" PROPERTY LINE SIDE SETBACK 25'-0" K C A B T E S R A E R Y T L B T A P M O C I I I I E N L Y T R E P O R P 2 5'- 0 " 1 5'- 0 " BUILDABLE AREA A= 10,354 sq ft COMPATIBILITY REAR SETBACK 2 5'- 0 " PROPERTY LINE E P O R P E K C A B T E T S N O R Y F K C A B RTY LIN T E T S N O R G F NIN O E Z S A B PATIBILIT M O C K C A B T E S R A E R Y T I L I B T A P M O C I I E N L Y T R E P O R P T E E R T S E P U L A D A U G 3 1 4 5 1 5 7 8 7 s a x e T , n i t s u A P L D G 1220 Lavaca Street Thursday, September 8, 2022 SIDE SETBACK PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 SIDE SETBACK 25'-0" PROPERTY LINE " 0 - ' 5 1 PROPERTY AREA = 27,873 SF PROPERTY AREA = 27,873 SF TYPICAL MF-4 PROPERTY SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 1 5413 GUADALUPE ST SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 2 N A01 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS: COMPATIBILITY DIAGRAMS
ITEM 6 C15-2022-0043 LATE BACKUP SEPT 12 - IN SUPPORT — original pdf
Our property is brown in this image. We received signatures of support from 6 nearby neighbors at 5 properties. Those in support are highlighted in green. The house on Texas Ave was originally concerned and asked for a postponement at a previous HOA meeting, but is now in support. The neighbor directly behind the property is still not in support and prefers the property to be subdivided so that both lots front on 38th street (which would not allow the existing house to be saved).
Play video — original link
Play video
BOA SIGN IN AND ATTENDANCE SHEET FOR SEPT 12, 2022 — original pdf
Backup
ITEM 3 C16-2022-0005 PP DS 10-10-22 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item 3 DATE: September 12, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C16-2022-0005 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___-____Agustina Rodriguez (out) ___Y____Richard Smith ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) APPLICANT: Jaden Rodriguez OWNER: Leo Garcia ADDRESS: 7712 ELROY RD VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a sign variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-10-130 (Commercial Sign District Regulations) (G) (1) from sign height of 30 feet above frontage street pavement grade (maximum allowed) to 40 feet (requested) above frontage street pavement grade in order to provide signage for The Circuit of the Americas in a “PUD”, Planned Unit Development zoning district. Note: The Land Development Code sign regulations 25-10-130 Commercial Sign District Regulations. (A) This section applies to a commercial sign district. (B) One Freestanding sign is permitted on a lot. Additional freestanding signs may be permitted under Section 25-10-131 (Additional Freestanding Signs Permitted). (G) The sign height may not exceed the greater of: (1) 30 feet above frontage street pavement grade; or (2) 6 feet above grade at the base of the sign. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Melissa Hawthorne motions to postpone to October 10, 2022; Board member Michael Von Ohlen second on 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 10, 2022. FINDING: 1. The variance is necessary because strict enforcement of the Article prohibits and reasonable opportunity to provide adequate signs on the site, considering the unique features of a site such as its dimensions, landscape, or topography, because: OR, 2. The granting of this variance will not have a substantially adverse impact upon neighboring properties, because: OR, 3. The granting of this variance will not substantially conflict with the stated purposes of this sign ordinance, because: AND, 4. Granting a variance would not provide the applicant with a special privilege not enjoyed by others similarly situated or potentially similarly situated, because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for
ITEM 4 C15-2022-0065 DS PP 11-14-22 — original pdf
CITY OF AUSTIN Board of Adjustment Decision Sheet Item 4 DATE: Monday September 12, 2022 CASE NUMBER: C15-2022-0065 ___Y____Thomas Ates ___Y____Brooke Bailey ___Y____Jessica Cohen ___Y____Melissa Hawthorne ___Y____Barbara Mcarthur ___Y____Darryl Pruett ___Y____Richard Smith ___-____Agustina Rodriguez (out) ___Y____Michael Von Ohlen ___Y____Nicholl Wade ___Y____Kelly Blume (Alternate) ___Y____Carrie Waller (Alternate) ___-____Marcel Gutierrez-Garza (Alternate) OWNER/APPLICANT: Daniel Strinden ADDRESS: 1700 LORETO DR VARIANCE REQUESTED The applicant is requesting a variance(s) from the Land Development Code, Section 25-2-515 (Rear Yard of a Through Lot) from setback requirements to decrease the minimum rear yard setback from 25 feet (required) to 15 feet (requested) in order to erect a detached Two-Family residential unit in an “SF-3-NP”, Single-Family Residence-Neighborhood Plan zoning district. (MLK Neighborhood Plan) Note: Per LDC 25-2-515 Rear Yard of Through Lot for a Through Lot, a rear yard must comply with the minimum requirements applicable to a front yard. BOARD’S DECISION: The public hearing was closed by Madam Chair Jessica Cohen, Board member Michael Von Ohlen motions to Approve; Madam Chair Jessica Cohen second; Board member Michael Von Ohlen withdraws the motion to Approve and motions to Postpone to November 14, 2022, Board member Brooke Bailey second on 11-0 vote; POSTPONED TO NOVEMBER 14, 2022. FINDING: 1. The Zoning regulations applicable to the property do not allow for a reasonable use because: 2. (a) The hardship for which the variance is requested is unique to the property in that: (b) The hardship is not general to the area in which the property is located because: 3. The variance will not alter the character of the area adjacent to the property, will not impair the use of adjacent conforming property, and will not impair the purpose of the regulations of the zoning district in which the property is located because: Elaine Ramirez Executive Liaison Jessica Cohen Madam Chair for