5.2 - 4204 Avenue H — original pdf
Backup
Backup
Backup
Backup
6 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 6, 2024 HR-2023-087103; C14H-1991-0009 A.O. WATSON HOUSE 402 WEST 12TH STREET PROPOSAL Replace non-original façade elements, construct an elevator tower, add landscaping, and rework the existing three-story addition. Replace windows with matching units in original openings at the secondary façade. Remove non-original accessibility and landscape elements, creating a new accessible ground-floor entrance with a ramp. Replace roof in-kind with cedar shakes. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) South (main) elevation: Replace the non-original upper-story window with a more appropriately sized opening and configuration to match the historic window below. Add terraced landscaping. Remove the existing non-original railing and replace it, matching the proportions of the original railing above. 2) West: Construct a new brick elevator tower. Replace existing replacement windows in-kind, matching openings and proportions. Construct a flat-roofed, one-story covered breezeway. 3) East: Replace window in-kind. Construct a new ADA ramp. Set the addition back 1’ on this side from the original façade. Construct a new brick egress stairway. 4) North (rear): Remove and rebuild the existing three-story addition. The proposed addition features a flat roof, mostly transparent curtainwall, and interior egress stairs. Construct a pool behind brick walls to match landscaping at the adjacent lawn. ARCHITECTURE Two-story Queen Anne built in 1897. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 1. General standards The proposed project removes mostly non-original and deteriorated material from the building, replacing in-kind where beyond repair and utilizing physical and photographic evidence for replacement elements. 3. Roofs The proposed project replaces the cedar shake roof in-kind. 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project repairs the existing siding. 5. Windows, doors, and screens The proposed project utilizes existing openings and replaces windows in-kind where deteriorated and/or nonoriginal at secondary façades only. Historic-age windows at the original façade do not appear to be slated for replacement. 6. Porches The proposed project replaces the existing non-historic porch railing with a more proportionally appropriate railing matching the original second-floor railing. 7. Chimneys The proposed project does not remove or replace the existing chimneys. Residential additions 1. Location The proposed addition is located in place of an existing addition. 6 – 2 2. Scale, massing, …
Backup
7 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 6, 2024 HR-2024-008448 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4411 AVENUE B PROPOSAL PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS Construct a second-floor addition to a one-story noncontributing garage behind a contributing house. The proposed addition is clad in painted lapped siding to match the existing siding and features fiberglass and metal casement doors and windows. It is two stories in height, with a gabled roof and rear spiral staircase. The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 1.4: Appropriate Treatment Options for Contributing or Potentially Contributing Structures The applicant has provided documentation that the garage was not constructed during the historic period. The proposed project materials match the scale, profile, and appearance of the existing materials and are compatible with the main structure on the property. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Ensure that the addition will not be visible from the street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the application. The applicant has provided the information requested by the Committee. LOCATION MAP 7 – 2
Backup
HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 2 HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 3 40'-0" McMANSION ZONE 1 40'-0" McMANSION ZONE 2 35'-6 1/2" McMANSION ZONE 3 1237'10" 34'-0" TWO CAR PARKING 14" TREE 10" TREE " 6 - ' 8 Y A W E V R D I [E] HVAC 1238'0" 129'10.2" S 62°54'11" E 1238'0" O H E O H E O H E [E] OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO [E] ELECTRICAL SERVICE index of drawings sheet description sp 1 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5 SITE PLAN; PERSPECTIVES; PROJECT NOTES FLOOR PLANS + ROOF PLAN; DOOR + WINDOW SCHEDULES BUILDING ELEVATIONS BUILDING SECTIONS; PLAN DETAILS + INTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS REFLECTED CEILING, LIGHTING, POWER PLANS 1/8"=1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4"=1'-0" + 3/8"=1'-0" 1"=1'-0" + 3"=1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" STRUCTURAL NOTES FOUNDATION PLAN + DETAILS CEILING FRAMING PLAN DETAILS FRAMING DETAILS ROOF FRAMING s 0.0 s 1.0 s 2.0 s 3.0 s 3.1 s 4.0 s 5.0 WIND BRACING PLANS + DETAILS s 6.0 s 6.1 s6.2 DETAILS DETAILS DETAILS scale AS NOTED AS NOTED AS NOTED AS NOTED NTS AS NOTED AS NOTED AS NOTED AS NOTED AS NOTED [E] DRIVEWAY NO CONSTRUCTION ACCESS IN FRONT YARD. TREE PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED b e u n e v a 1 2'-6 " 1 / 2 C R Z " 3 - ' 6 Z R C 4 / 1 23" TREE 25" TREE BRICK PAVER BRICK PAVER 5'-9" 1/4 CRZ 11'-6" 1/2 CRZ ' E " 9 3 3 0 ° 7 2 N " 4 2 . ' 5 7 [E] SIDEWALK [E] CONC + BRICK PATH TO REMAIN DASHED LINE OF TOPOGRAPHY CONTOURS 1 site plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" [e] single family 1 story wd frame peir and beam [E] WD PORCH 6'-0" 1/4 CRZ 24" TREE 1 1 2 / 2 ' - 0 C " R Z I E N I L G N D L I U B F R E T P A H C B U S 25'-0" SETBACK 1238'0" O H E " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S O H E lots 5,6+7 block 7 9727.5 sq ft [E] WD DECK +STAIRS 18" TREE note [E] DECOMPOSED GRAVEL PATHS NOT SHOWN (NOT CONTRIBUTING TO IMPERVIOUS COVER) …
34'-0" TWO CAR PARKING " 6 - ' 8 Y A W E V R D I 14" TREE 10" TREE [E] HVAC O H E O H E O H E [E] OVERHEAD POWER LINE TO [E] ELECTRICAL SERVICE preliminary FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY. NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION. ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ACTIONS RESULTING FROM UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESE DRAWINGS. 129'10.2" S 62°54'11" E O H E " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S O H E E H O O O H H E E O O H H E E E H O 1238'0" O H E O H E E L B A T R O P T E L I O T E H O E H O 5'-0" SETBACK y e l l a d e v a p E H O ' W " 7 0 3 0 ° 7 2 S " 6 . 9 4 7 ' 72" DIA EXTERIOR METAL SPIRAL STAIR EXISTING E H O E H O E H O E H O " 0 - ' 8 " 0 - ' 8 20'-0" CONST TRASH/SPOILS 20'-0" MATL STAGING AREA 25'-5 1/2" covered porch ADDITION lots 5,6+7 block 7 9727.5 sq ft WASTEWATER CLEANOUT note [E] DECOMPOSED GRAVEL PATHS NOT SHOWN (NOT CONTRIBUTING TO IMPERVIOUS COVER) " 8 - ' 0 1 1238'0" [E] WD DECK +STAIRS 18" TREE HIGHEST ADJ GRADE ELEVATION " 0 - ' 2 1 AVERAGE ADJ GRADE main room EXISTING office ADDITION 9'-0" [E] HVAC bathroom EXISTING OHE 1238'0" N 63°00'00" W 129'10.34" " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S LOWEST ADJ GRADE OHE 1238'0" G N I T S I X E OHE 1238'0" HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 GAS METER 1 2'-6 " 1 / 2 C R Z " 3 - ' 6 Z R C 4 / 1 23" TREE 25" TREE BRICK PAVER BRICK PAVER 5'-9" 1/4 CRZ 11'-6" 1/2 CRZ ' E " 9 3 3 0 ° 7 2 N " 4 2 . ' 5 7 b e u n e v a [E] DRIVEWAY NO CONSTRUCTION ACCESS IN FRONT YARD. TREE PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED [E] SIDEWALK [E] WATER METER [E] CONC + BRICK PATH TO REMAIN DASHED LINE OF TOPOGRAPHY CONTOURS [E] WD PORCH …
b e u n e v a [E] DRIVEWAY NO CONSTRUCTION ACCESS IN FRONT YARD. TREE PROTECTION NOT REQUIRED [E] SIDEWALK [E] WATER METER [E] CONC + BRICK PATH TO REMAIN DASHED LINE OF TOPOGRAPHY CONTOURS HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 HIGHEST NAT GRADE ZONE 1 GAS METER 1 2'-6 " 1 / 2 C R Z " 3 - ' 6 Z R C 4 / 1 23" TREE 25" TREE BRICK PAVER BRICK PAVER 5'-9" 1/4 CRZ 11'-6" 1/2 CRZ ' E " 9 3 3 0 ° 7 2 N " 4 2 . ' 5 7 34'-0" TWO CAR PARKING " 6 - ' 8 Y A W E V R D I 14" TREE 10" TREE [E] HVAC [e] single family 1 story wd frame peir and beam [E] WD PORCH 6'-0" 1/4 CRZ 24" TREE 1 1 2 / 2 ' - 0 C " R Z I E N I L G N D L I U B F R E T P A H C B U S 25'-0" SETBACK 1 site plan Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 129'10.2" S 62°54'11" E O H E " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S O H E O H E O H E O H E " 0 - ' 8 " 0 - ' 8 20'-0" CONST TRASH/SPOILS 20'-0" MATL STAGING AREA 25'-5 1/2" covered porch ADDITION lots 5,6+7 block 7 9727.5 sq ft WASTEWATER CLEANOUT note [E] DECOMPOSED GRAVEL PATHS NOT SHOWN (NOT CONTRIBUTING TO IMPERVIOUS COVER) " 8 - ' 0 1 1238'0" [E] WD DECK +STAIRS 18" TREE HIGHEST ADJ GRADE ELEVATION " 0 - ' 2 1 AVERAGE ADJ GRADE main room EXISTING office ADDITION 9'-0" [E] HVAC bathroom EXISTING OHE 1238'0" N 63°00'00" W 129'10.34" " 0 - ' 5 K C A B T E S LOWEST ADJ GRADE OHE 1238'0" G N I T S I X E OHE 1238'0" E H O O O H H E E O O H H E E E H O 1238'0" O H E O H E E L B A T R O P T E L I O T E H O E H O 5'-0" SETBACK y e l l a d e v a p E H O ' W " 7 0 3 0 ° 7 2 S " …
Backup
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MARCH 6, 2024 C14H-1983-0003; HR-2024-015565 KOPPEL BUILDING 320 CONGRESS AVENUE 8 – 1 PROPOSAL Paint the building’s exterior and replace the awnings. ARCHITECTURE Two-part commercial block ca. 1888. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects at historic landmarks. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Repair and alterations 4. Exterior walls and trim The proposed project appears to add paint to unpainted limestone sills, arches, and column detailing (elements labeled “Ammonite” in the proposal). 11. Commercial storefronts The proposed project does not construct new awnings but replaces the existing awnings with new fabric. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve paint only for previously painted surfaces, encouraging the applicant to conduct a historic paint analysis to determine the original paint color, and to explore the feasibility of restoring any original unpainted masonry rather than repainting it. Deny the request to paint bare limestone detailing. LOCATION MAP 8 – 2 Photos 8 – 3 Google Street View, 2022 8 – 4 8 – 5 Historic landmark inspection photos, 2024
Historic Review Application For Office Use Only Date of Submission:__________________________ Plan Review #: ______________________________ Property Address: _____________________________________________________________________ Historic Landmark Local Historic District National Register Historic District Historic Landmark Name or Historic District Name:______________________________________________________________________________________________ Applicant Name: _______________________________ Phone #: ______________________ Email: ______________________________ Applicant Address: _______________________________ City: _______________________ __ State: ________________ Zip: __________ Please describe all proposed exterior changes with location and materials. If you need more space, attach an additional sheet. PROPOSED CHANGE(S) LOCATION OF PROPOSED CHANGE(S) PROPOSED MATERIAL(S) 1) 2) 3) Submittal Requirements 1. One set of dimensioned building plans. Plans must: a) specify materials and finishes to be used, and b) show existing and proposed conditions for alterations and additions. Site Plan Elevations Floor Plan Roof Plan 2. Color photographs of building and site: Elevation(s) proposed to be modified Detailed view of each area proposed to be modified Applicant Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ 44444320 Congress Ave, Austin, TX 78701Koppel BuildingSara Pilar512-592-8876sara.pilar@colliers.com320 Congress Ave, Suite CAustinTX78701Replace awnings1.29.24Exterior building windowsSee AttachedExterior PaintingExteriorSee AttachedDocuSign Envelope ID: EED0576B-0A3C-441B-87BC-4ABDD9CF024C Design Standards and Guidelines for Historic Properties Adopted December 2012 Design Standards and Guidelines for Historic Properties Landmarks and National Register historic district properties If you are making changes to a historic landmark, the project must comply with these standards to receive a Certificate of Appropriateness. If you are making changes to a contributing property or constructing a new building within a National Register historic district, consider the standards below as advisory guidelines: 1. Use a property for its historic purpose or place it in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. Retain and preserve the historic character or a property shall be retained and preserved. Avoid the removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property. 3. Recognize each property as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires visual qualities and, where possible, …
9 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MARCH 6, 2024 HR-2024-005147 SIXTH STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 603 RED RIVER STREET PROPOSAL Remodel a ca. 1889-1900 building from a bar to a restaurant. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Repair and repaint the existing brick façade. 2) Remove non-historic accretions and connections at secondary elevations. Add a new shade structure and plantings at the north elevation. 3) Add brick detail on the west façade. 4) Retain the existing openings and replace the storefront. Reopen infilled openings at secondary elevations. 5) Replace awning. One-story masonry garage building with two bay doors, a metal awning with enlarged brackets, simple cornice detailing, and infilled arched openings at secondary elevations. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The building at 603 Red River Street, alternately addressed as 601 and 605 Red River Street, was most likely first constructed as a one-bay frame structure with a stovepipe visible on 1889 Sanborn maps. By 1900, the building was reclad, and a masonry addition had been built to add the second (northernmost) bay. It appears to have been built and used as a blacksmith shop until 1920, when it was converted to an auto service station; by 1935 an addition had been constructed. A motorcycle and automobile repair shop shared the building until 1927, when both halves were occupied by Raven’s Garage. Raven’s stayed in business until at least 1959. Jesse L. Raven, a World War I veteran who enlisted at eighteen, opened the shop upon his return from the war. Raven was also an officer of the American Legion and executive officer of the Texas State Rifle Association; he remained a nationally recognized top marksman for much of the early twentieth century. According to a 2015 staff report by Historic Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky for the Raven family home in Travis Heights (which was later demolished, despite the staff recommendation for landmark designation), the Raven’s Garage legacy continued after its days as a functional garage ended: Jesse Raven, along with his brother, Louis, grew up in Austin and were auto mechanics from a very early age. They opened Raven’s Garage at 605 Red River Street in the early 1920s and were in business at that location until around 1980. The building on Red River Street was then a live music club called Raven’s Garage for a couple of years in the 1980s, and later became Emo’s, the stalwart of …
SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT REVITALIZATION 603 RED RIVER STREET View from Red River St.Looking South/East at 603 E 6th St. Austin History Center, c. 1975, Austin, Texas H L C R E V I E W | 6 0 3 R E D R I V E R S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | F E B 0 7 , 2 0 2 4 603 RED RIVER ST 600 BLOCK PROPERTY SUMMARY: ADDRESS: DATE BUILT: 603 RED RIVER STREET N/A HISTORIC DESIGNATION: NRHP 1975 NHRP SURVEY: CONTRIBUTING SIXTH STREET SNAPSHOP RE-SURVEY, 2022: CONTRIBUTING CURRENT USE: VACANT . T S S E H C E N E 6TH ST. . T S R E V I R D E R SITE PLAN S S E R G N O C S O Z A R B O T N I C A J N A S SIXTH STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND Y T I N I R T E 6 T H S E H C E N R E V I R D E R E N I B A S 5 3 - I WEST ELEVATION CURRENT PHOTOGRAPH (2023) H L C R E V I E W | 6 0 3 R E D R I V E R S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | F E B 0 7 , 2 0 2 4 View from Red River St.Looking South/East at 603 E 6th St. Austin History Center, c. 1975, Austin, Texas HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPH : 1975 WEST ELEVATION: EXISTING 2023 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION B U I L D I N G C O M P A R I S O N O V E R T I M E H L C R E V I E W | 6 0 3 R E D R I V E R S T R E E T P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O …
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION HISTORIC LANDMARK INSPECTION RESULTS MARCH 6, 2024 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Certify the historic landmarks noted as passing their inspections in the following exhibit as eligible for the partial ad valorem tax exemption granted by Title 11, Article 2 (Partial Exemption for Historic Landmarks) of the Code of Ordinances, adopted under the authority provided in Article 8, Section 1-f (Ad Valorem Tax Relief) of the Texas Constitution and Section 11.24 (Historic Sites) of the Texas Tax Code. X – 1 Exhibit A. 2024 Landmark Inspection Results X – 2 State Designation Landmark Name Driskill, Day & Ford Building Depot Hotel Horton - Duval House Sneed Home Mansbendel - Williams House Gilfillan House Larmour Block (F) Sauter - Alley House Grandberry Building McCallum House Monroe Building Wooten Medical Offices Berner-Clark-Mercado House Mitchell-Robertson Building Blondie Pharr House Carver Museum Johnson House Dawson - Blaylock House Howson House Tips House Caswell House Millican House Paggi House Oliphant House Red - Purcell House St. Charles House Ney Museum Porter House St. David's Episcopal Church Castleman-Bull House Hirshfeld House And Cottage Smoot Family Home Taylor Lime Kiln Goodman Building French Legation Address Zoning Case Number 403 E 6th Street C14H-1974-0043 504 E 5th Street C14H-1977-0008 6706 Bluff Springs Road C14H-1977-0009 1801 Nelms Drive C14H-1977-0011 3824 Avenue F C14H-1978-0048 603 W 8th Street C14H-1980-0027 916 Congress Avenue C14H-1982-0001-F 4012 Avenue F C14H-1982-0018 907 Congress Avenue C14H-1986-0015 613 W 32nd Street C14H-1986-0041 300 E 6th Street C14H-1988-0005 C14H-1991-0002 109 E 10th Street 1807 E Cesar Chavez Street C14H-2000-0009 C14H-2004-0008 909 Congress Avenue C14H-2008-0019 801 Highland Avenue C14-2001-0148-001 1165 Angelina Street C14-2001-0148-002 1022 E 7th Street 1001 W Mary Street C14-2002-0031 C14H-1974-0001 700 San Antonio Street C14H-1974-0002 2336 S Congress Avenue C14H-1974-0003 1404 West Avenue C14H-1974-0004 1610 West Avenue C14H-1974-0006 211 S Lamar Boulevard C14H-1974-0008 3900 Avenue C C14H-1974-0009 210 Academy Drive C14H-1974-0014 316 E 6th Street C14H-1974-0015 304 E 44th Street C14H-1974-0016 409 E 5th Street C14H-1974-0017 300 E 7th Street 201 Red River Street C14H-1974-0017-A C14H-1974-0019 303 W 9th Street C14H-1999-0007 1316 W 6th Street C14H-1974-0021 2614 Pecos St C14H-1974-0022 202 W 13th Street C14H-1974-0023 802 San Marcos Street Inspection Result Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass RTHL RTHL RTHL RTHL RTHL RTHL RTHL RTHL RTHL …
REGULAR MEETING COMMISSION FOR WOMEN WEDNESDAY, MARCH 6th, 2024, AT 12:00 PM AUSTIN CITY HALL, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS ROOM, ROOM 1101 301 WEST 2ND STREET, AUSTIN, TEXAS, 78701 Some members of the Commission for Women may be participating by videoconference. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, call or email Tabitha Taylor, (512) 972-5023, Tabitha.Taylor@austintexas.gov . CURRENT BOARD MEMBERS: Diana Melendez, Chair Rebecca Austen Vanessa Bissereth Becky Bullard Julie Glasser Angela Harris Pam Rattan Maria Veloz Salas Katrina Scheihing Josephine Serrata Jocelyn Tau AGENDA CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first 10 speakers signed up prior to the meeting being called to order will each be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES DISCUSSION 1. Approve the minutes of the Commission for Women regular meeting February 7th, 2024. 2. Presentation: Accessibility and Affordable Childcare, Catherine Mchorse, Early Childhood Council, City of Austin DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS 3. Approve Women’s Hall of Fame Recognition Plan 4. Review and approve Collective Sex Crime Response Model (CSCRM) FY2025 Budget Recommendations WORKING GROUP/COMMITTEE UPDATES 5. Updates from the Joint Inclusion Committee (JIC) regarding upcoming collaborative 6. Update from Working Group on Recognition of Equity for Women and Girls regarding opportunities within the community. recognition plan candidate selection process. 7. Update from Working Group on Quality-of-Life Study regarding the progression of the Quality Life Study 8. Update from Working Group on FY2025 Budget regarding funding allocations. 9. Update from Working Group on Joint Collective Sex Crime Response Model (CSCRM) Project regarding current financial allocations and project needs. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The City of Austin is committed to compliance with the American with Disabilities Act. Reasonable modifications and equal access to communications will be provided upon request. Meeting locations are planned with wheelchair access. If requiring Sign Language Interpreters or alternative formats, please give notice at least 2 days (48 hours) before the meeting date. Please call Tabitha Taylor at the Office of Civil Rights, at (512) 972-5023 or Tabitha. Taylor @austintexas.gov , for additional information; TTY users’ route through Relay Texas …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, February 7th, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche ab Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x x x x x x Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. Santiago spoke on the TXDoT expansion of IH-35. Steve Walthall spoke on the Pleasant Valley Schoolhouse. Dewey Poteet spoke on the Pleasant Valley Schoolhouse. Meghan King spoke on Preservation Austin updates. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 13, 2023 – Offered for consent approval. 2. January 10, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. BRIEFINGS 3. Presentation on the Equity-Based Preservation Plan Presenter: Cara Bertron CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Item 4 was pulled for discussion. Heritage Grant Applications 5. HR-2023-160038 – 421 E 6th St. Paggi Carriage Shop Council District 9 Proposal: Roof improvements. Applicant: Caitlyn Schwab City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Approve Certificates of Appropriateness for all Heritage Grant projects. MOTION: Approve the application per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. 6. HR-2023-160051 – 412 Congress Ave. Kreisle Building Council District 9 Proposal: Roof improvements. Applicant: Caitlyn Schwab City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Approve Certificates of Appropriateness for all Heritage Grant projects. MOTION: Approve the application per passage of the consent agenda on …
EMMA S. BARRIENROS MEXICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER REGULAR MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2024 The Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center convened in a Regular meeting on Wednesday, February 7, 2024, at City Hall – Board and Commissions Room located at 301 West Second Street in Austin, Texas 78701. (Some members of the ESB-MACC Advisory Board participated via videoconference.) Chair Navarro called the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center Meeting to order at 6:00pm. Board Members in Attendance: Board Members in Attendance Remotely: Angelica Navarro, Chair John Estrada, Member (Left at 9:40pm) Hilario “Larry” Amaro, Vice Chair Noemi Castro, Member Cynthia “Cy” Herrera, Member (Arrived at 6:09/Left at 8:10pm) Raul “Roy” Reyna, Member Lily Zamarripa-Saenz, Member Board Members Absent: Gerardo Gandy, Member Anthony Martinez, Member Eduardo “Eddie” Rodriguez, Member Staff in Attendance: Jodi Jay, PARD Assistant Director Laura Esparza, PARD Division Manager of Museums and Cultural Programs Michelle Rojas, ESB-MACC Culture and Arts Education Manager Marie Ortiz, ESB-MACC Culture and Arts Education Supervisor Tina Davila, ESB-MACC Administrative Specialist PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. The minutes from the Regular meeting of January 10, 2024, were approved on Member Zamarripa- Saenz’s motion. Vice Chair Amaro seconded the motion. Unanimous vote (6.0). Motion passed. Members Gandy, Herrera, Martinez, and Rodriguez were absent. STAFF BRIEFINGS 2. Staff Report by Marie Ortiz, ESB-MACC Culture and Arts Education Supervisor and Michelle Rojas, ESB-MACC Culture and Arts Education Manager on January and February programs, 1 marketing, scope of outreach efforts by ESB-MACC staff, La Mujer and Awards of Excellence planning report, and opportunities for Board participation at ESB-MACC programs for the month of February. Marie Ortiz, ESB-MACC Culture and Arts Education Supervisor gave a report on the Holistic Wellness programs, Education, Caminos Teen Leadership, and Academia Cuauhtli programming, sharing highlights for the month of January along with upcoming programs & events for the month of February. She also provided an update of current and upcoming marketing and outreach events and informed the Board they were currently in the process of securing a venue location for their annual La Mujer event. She also mentioned the Awards of Excellence event would take place June 29, 2024, at the Long Center and the MACC’s Event Coordinator, Estrella DeLeon would offer ways for the Advisory Board to assist with the event, such as securing donations, sponsorships, helping with event planning and having a role in the …
RECOMMENDATION Commission for Women Recommendation Number [_____]: Fiscal Year 2024-25 Funding for Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) Actions WHEREAS, the Commission for Women (“Commission”) of the City of Austin (“City”) serves as an advisory body that advocates for and inspires the City Council (“Council”) and City Manager to prioritize women’s quality of life, so that Austin becomes the most equitable city in the nation for women and girls; and WHEREAS, in September 2019, the City Manager’s Office contracted the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), in conjunction with the Women’s Law Project and the Wellesley Centers for Women, to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the way sexual assaults reported to the Austin Police Department (APD) are investigated and processed; and WHEREAS, on November 14, 2022, the final PERF report was released, Austin Police Department (APD) Review, Reported Sexual Assault Comprehensive Evaluation, and included comprehensive findings and over one hundred recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Austin Police Department worked with the Austin/Travis County Sexual Assault Response and Resource Team (SARRT) to address the PERF recommendations and take actions, including revisions to APD policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Collective Sex Crimes Response Model (CSCRM) was established in early 2023 to coordinate the full response to the PERF report, and includes representatives from APD, SARRT, nonprofit and community organizations, survivors and survivor advocates; and WHEREAS, the Commission for Women and Public Safety Commission formed a joint working group in 2023 to support and track the work of the CSCRM and report progress to their respective commissions; and WHEREAS, the work of the CSCRM is significant in scope, spanning multiple working groups, and has identified serious unmet funding requirements and additional needs for fiscal year 2024- 2025; and WHEREAS, funding has been allocated to support APD comprehensive sexual assault/trauma curriculum development and delivery, additional detective hours on misdemeanor and cold cases, the hiring of a CSCRM project manager, the implementation of a survivor survey and a stipend for volunteer project members, among others; and WHEREAS, law enforcement staffing shortages and hiring challenges are impacting support for survivors of sexual assault, and training and increased financial support and innovative approaches are needed to overcome these shortfalls; and WHEREAS, the SAFE forensic nursing program is critically short-staffed due to underfunding and low salaries, not all sexual assault victims are able to have evidence collected and preserved and receive the medical help they need, and in 2023, …