PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW SHEET PC DATE: 07/28/2020 SPC-2020-0076A CASE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: Vacancy Brewery ADDRESS: APPLICANT: 415 E St. Elmo Road 415 St Elmo, LLC (Scott Trainer) P.O. Box 160896 Austin, Texas, 78745 (512) 965-1369 Site Specifics (John Hussey) 700 N Lamar, 200A Austin, Texas, 78748 (512) 472-5252 AGENT: Williamson Creek CASE MANAGER: Robert Anderson, (512) 974-3026 or robert.anderson@austintexas.gov WATERSHED: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Congress Combined (East Congress) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The request is for a conditional use allowing a brewery and tap room as a Light Manufacturing Use in an LI zoning district within 540 feet of single family uses. SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit. The site plan will comply with all requirements of the Land Development Code prior to its release. SUMMARY STAFF COMMENT ON SITE PLAN: The applicant proposes a 4,860 square foot brewery and a 1,180 square foot tap room for on-site sale and consumption. The Light Manufacturing Use permits beer or ale produced on-site to be sold for on-site consumption. Because the brewery is within 540 of single family uses, it is a conditional use according to Land Development Code Section 25-2- 865(B)(2). Therefore, Land Use Commission review and approval is required. The site is already developed. No construction will occur with this site plan approval. Two letters of support were received and are included within the back-up materials. One from OS St. Elmo, LLC and one from the South Congress Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team. PROJECT INFORMATION: SITE AREA ZONING PROPOSED USE EXISTING PARKING 4.19 acres LI-CO-NP Light Manufacturing Use 92 vehicle spaces (5 ADA) 1 of 7B-16 SPC-2020-0076A NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District Austin Lost and Found Pets Austin Neighborhoods Council Battle Bend Springs Homeowner’s Association Bike Austin Friends of Austin Neighborhoods Go Austin Vamos Austin 78745 Homeless Neighborhood Association Homeowner’s Assoc. of Colonial Trails Vacancy Brewery Page 2 Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation Onion Creek Homeowners Assoc. Preservation Austin SELTexas Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group South Austin Neighborhood Alliance (SANA) South Congress Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW AND EVALUATION CRITERIA The following evaluation is included to provide staff position on each point of the conditional use permit criteria. Section 25-5-145 of the Land Development Code states: “The Commission shall determine whether the proposed development or use of a conditional use site plan complies with the requirements of this section. A …
PLANNING COMMISISON SITE PLAN – COMPATIBILITY VARIANCES ONLY SP-2019-0591C HEARING DATE: July 28, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION 924 E. 7th St. Development 924 E 7th Street 7th & San Marcos, LLC 2004 Lakeshore Drive Austin, Texas 78746-2907 (512) 328-8363 CASE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: APPLICANT: AGENT: LJA Engineering, Inc. (David J. Hildebrandt, P.E.) 7500 Rialto Blvd Building II, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78735 (512) 439-4700 (512) 974-3338 Randall Rouda Randall.Rouda@austintexas.gov CASE MANAGER: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Central East Austin NP Area PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The applicant is proposing to redevelop five vacant narrow lots, zoned TOD-NP (Plaza Saltillo Transit Oriented Development - Neighborhood Plan) into a five story office building with a restaurant and retail space on the ground level and five floors of below grade parking. Total gross floor area (excluding below grade parking) is 104,723 square feet, with a total of 249 vehicle parking spaces (including 12 ADA spaces) and 72 bicycle spaces. The restaurant consists of 4,559 square feet and the ground floor retail would be 3,588 square feet. The site will have a single driveway accessing San Marcos Street, with trash and loading in the alley to the north. Public sidewalk improvements are proposed along 7th Street and along San Marcos and public alley improvements are proposed to the north of the building. One variance from compatibility setback requirements is being requested. DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE: 1) From 25 feet to 20 feet for the north setback. [LDC § 25-2-1063] SUMMARY STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The parcel to the north is separated from the subject site by a 20 foot wide public alley. That parcel is developed with an historic use (the French Legation) and is within the SF-3-H-HD-NP (Family Residence – Historic – Historic District - Neighborhood Plan) Zone. Improvements are proposed to the alley, within the public right of way. At the southern edge of the alley, the project includes new paving to serve a proposed loading zone. While the building wall is placed at 25 feet from the residentially zoned property to the north, in conformance with the compatibility setbacks, the new on-site paving for loading access and trash collection wall require a variance for construction beginning 20 feet south of those parcels. No written objections to the proposed variance have been received. The owner of the parcel to the north has submitted written comments in general support of the project. The Plaza Saltillo TOD Regulating Plan establishes the majority …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET CASE NO.: C8-2019-0062.0A P.C. DATE: July 28, 2020 SUBDIVISION NAME: Resubdivision of Lot 3, Less West 53 feet thereof, Block 2, Magnolia Addition AREA: 0.4683 acres LOT(S): 2 OWNER/APPLICANT: Haskell 1411, LLC AGENT: Permit Partners, LLC (Mark Harries) (Jennifer Hanlen) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: 1411 Haskell St. WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake COUNTY: Travis EXISTING ZONING: SF-3-NP JURISDICTION: Full NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: East Cesar Chavez PROPOSED LAND USE: Residential VARIANCES: A variance to section 25-4-175 to allow a residential flag lot has been requested. The applicant is proposing one residential flag lot with this application for Lot 2. The applicant has obtained approval from the Fire Department to verify accessibility for emergency responders, approval from the Austin Water Utility, Austin Energy, and the City Arborist to verify there is adequate room for the required utilities and enhanced tree protection on the site. It is the Staff’s opinion that the proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding development, and is consistent with other flag lots or multi-units within the neighborhood. It should also be noted that there are no known deed restrictions on the site, and a note has been added that requires all addresses for residential lots utilizing a flag lot design must be displayed at their closest point of access to a public street for emergency responders. Because the application meets the flag lot criteria as required by the Land Development Code, the Staff recommends approval of the variance. For additional information on the variance request see the accompanied memo and exhibits. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of the Resubdivision of Lot 3, Less West 53 feet thereof, Block 2, Magnolia Addition composed of two lots on 0.4683 acres. The applicant is proposing to resubdivide a portion of a lot into a two lot subdivision for residential uses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: If the variance is approved, the staff recommends approval of the plat. With variance approval, this plat would meet all applicable State and City of Austin LDC requirements. CASE MANAGER: Cesar Zavala Email address: cesar.zavala@austintexas.gov PHONE: 512-974-3404 1 of 8B-18 Legend Street Labels 0.2 0 0.08 0.2 Miles NAD_1983_StatePlane_Texas_Central_FIPS_4203_Feet Date Printed: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey. This product has been produced by the City of Austin for the sole purpose of geographic …
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET LOT(S): 2 COUNTY: Travis PC DATE: July 28, 2020 CASE NO.: C8-2019-0127.0A SUBDIVISION NAME: Cherico Subdivision AREA: 0.497 ac OWNER: Austin Land Development, LLC (Addison Thom) AGENT/APPLICANT: Jennifer Hanlen (Permit Partners, LLC) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: 1103 Cherico St WATERSHED: Boggy Creek Watershed EXISTING ZONING: SF-3-NP PROPOSED LAND USE: Residential DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for approval of the Cherico Subdivision which will create a 2 lot subdivision out of previously platted land (Hood’s Eastside Lots, Resub of Tracts A & B) for residential use. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of the subdivision as it meets all applicable State and City of Austin LDC requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Joey de la Garza EMAIL: joeydelagarza@austintexas.gov PHONE: 512-974-2664 1 of 4B-19 2 of 4B-19 3 of 4B-19 Y R E L TIL GOVALLE NEAL R E T N U G O RIC E H C LYONS Subject Tract ± This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying CASE#: C8-2019-0127.0A LOCATION:1103 Cherico St. purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. Base Map This product has been produced by the Planning and Development Review Department for the sole purpose of geographic reference. 4 of 4B-19
SUBDIVISION REVIEW SHEET LOT(S): 26 PC DATE: July 28, 2020 COUNTY: Travis CASE NO.: C8-2019-0114.1A SUBDIVISION NAME: Simon-Caskey Final Plat AREA: 16.664 ac. OWNER: Stephen Simon AGENT/APPLICANT: Bill E. Couch (Carlson, Brigance & Doering, Inc.) ADDRESS OF SUBDIVISION: 7715 W SH 71 WATERSHED: Williamson Creek EXISTING ZONING: SF-1, SF-2-NP, SF-6-NP PROPOSED LAND USE: Multifamily & Commercial with ROW and Parkland DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The request is for the approval of the Simon-Caskey Final Plat which will develop a 16.664 ac. previously un-platted tract creating 26 lots consisting of 2 lots for multifamily use (7.748 ac.), 21 lots for single-family use (3.810 ac.), 1 lot for parkland (1.307 ac.) and 2 lots designated for drainage & water quality easements and greenbelt (1.538 ac.) with 2.261 ac. being dedicated for streets with all associated improvements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends disapproval of the plat for the reasons listed in the comment report dated July 22, 2020 , and attached as Exhibit C. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Joey de la Garza EMAIL: joey.delagarza@austintexas.gov PHONE: 512-974-2664 B-201 of 8 A.J. BOND SURVEY #91, ABSTRACT # 114 JESSE WILLIAMS SURVEY #62, ABSTRACT # 788 Carlson, Brigance & Doering, Inc. B-202 of 8 Carlson, Brigance & Doering, Inc. B-203 of 8 CITY OF AUSTIN –DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION – MASTER COMMENT REPORT CASE NUMBER: UPDATE: U0 CASE MANAGER: C8-2019-0114.1A Joey de la Garza PHONE #: 512-974-2664 PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: Simon-Caskey Final Plat 7715 W SH 71 June 29, 2020 SUBMITTAL DATE: REPORT DUE DATE: July 28, 2020 FINAL REPORT DATE: July 22, 2020 STAFF REPORT: This report includes all staff comments received to date concerning your most recent subdivision application submittal. The comments may include requirements, recommendations, or information. The requirements in this report must be addressed by an updated submittal. The subdivision application will be approved when all requirements from each review discipline have been addressed. If you have any questions, concerns or if you require additional information about this report, please contact your case manager at the phone number listed above or by using the contact information listed for each reviewer in this report. Any change to the plan/plat shall not cause noncompliance with any applicable code or criteria. In addition, any change to the plat may trigger new comments. UPDATE DEADLINE INFORMATION (LDC 25-4-56; 25-4-82): All comments must be addressed by filing an updated submittal prior to the update deadline of September 28, …
Demolition Process Changes 1 of 176B-21 Timeline - 2017 Demolition Permit Audit Report issued identifying changes needed to the City’s demolition process • August: • December: City Council adopted Resolution No. 20171214-066 requesting DSD to conduct stakeholder meetings, and develop a proposal to re-design the demolition permitting process 2 of 176B-21 Timeline - 2018 • March and April: 4 stakeholder engagement meetings were held with 123 attendees • February–March and May–July: Online stakeholder engagement was conducted via the “Speakup Austin!” forum • October: DSD responded to Council’s resolution 3 of 176B-21 To Recommend Ordinance Amendments The Request: 4 of 176B-21 Pertaining Documents • Demolition Permit Audit Report • Council’s Resolution • DSD’s Demolition Process Recommendation Report • Draft Ordinance 5 of 176B-21 Demolition Permit Audit Report 6 of 176B-21 Council’s Resolution 7 of 176B-21 DSD’s Demolition Process Recommendation Report 8 of 176B-21 To Recommend Ordinance Amendments The Request: • PART 1. • PART 2. • PART 3. – City Code Section Chapter 25-11-37 (Demolition Permit Requirement) is amended to add a new Subsection (D) – City Code Section 25-11-64 (Verification of a Utility Service) is repealed and replaced – Consistent with the report of the Director of the Development Services Department, dated October 18, 2018, the City Council initiates code amendments to establish a contractor registration program for demolition permitting 9 of 176B-21 Proposed Changes to BCM • Sections that need additions and/or modifications to incorporate the notification recommendations – Chapter 1 – 4.6.2 Residential Building Inspections – 5.4.0 Building Code 7 10 of 176B-21 Next Steps • C&O Joint Committee recommendation Presented June 17 • Presentation to Planning Commission • Hearing at City Council 11 of 176B-21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 25-11 RELATING TO DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. PART 1. City Code Section 25-11-37 (Demolition Permit Requirement) is amended to add a new Subsection (D) to read as follows: (D) An applicant for a demolition permit must provide notice of the demolition to adjacent one-family structures, two-family structures, and any multi- family component of other adjacent structures. The building official shall adopt rules regarding the requirements of the notice. At a minimum, the required notification must be: (1) on a form approved by the director and specify the …
Street Impact Fee Briefing: Study Results & Policy Recommendation 1 of 46B-22 Overview • Impact Fees in Texas • Street Impact Fee Study Results • Staff Recommendation • Next Steps 2 2 of 46B-22 Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 • "Impact fee" means a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development. • Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, Roadways 3 3 of 46B-22 Why Street Impact Fees? • Determining a method for growth to pay for necessary infrastructure in a way that is: • Equitable – the same type and intensity development pays equal fee within a Service Area • Predictable – can determine the fee without doing an intensive study • Transparent – a worksheet to calculate the fee would be publicly available • Flexible – fees collected can be spent within a Service Area on any projects identified in the study within 10 years of being collected • Ultimate purpose is to develop a fair and reasonable fee development should pay for vehicle capacity improvements 4 4 of 46B-22 Example Developments Austin Development Round Rock+ Frisco+ Fort Worth+ Prosper+ Austin Mitigation/TIA 298 Apartments $86,288 $424,104 55,000 ft2 Office $317,388 $107,402 $631,164 $177,870 397,000 ft2 Office 46,700 ft2 Restaurant 250 Apartment 100 Room Hotel Single Family: 153 D.U. Office: 7,700 ft2 Retail: 7,700 ft2 $561,325 $1,566,632 $2,274,362 $260,000 $1,051,057 $624,023 $365,348 - $803,408 $216,315 - $475,915 $2,395,819 - $5,270,671 $375,130 - $785,925 $1,059,688 - $1,397,620 $214,005 - $282,260 $2,785,632 - $3,674,050 $761,045- $1,003,832 + Note: Comparison cities are collection rate. 5 5 of 46B-22 LGC Chapter 395 Required Study • Project new growth for the next 10 years • Establish Service Areas within which a maximum impact fee is determined • Develop Land Use Assumptions and corresponding growth projections within each Service Area • Project corresponding roadway capacity needs (Roadway Capacity Plan) to accommodate that growth within each Service Area 6 6 of 46B-22 Texas Law: CIP Definition • Roadway (Street) facilities means arterial or collector streets or roads that have been designated on an officially adopted roadway plan of the political subdivision, together with all necessary appurtenances. The term includes the political subdivision share of cost for roadways and associated improvements designated on the federal or Texas highway system, including local …
Special Meeting of the Planning Commission July 28, 2020 Planning Commission to be held July 28, 2020 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers, including applicants and representatives, must register in advance (Day before the scheduled meeting, July 27, 2020 by Noon). To speak remotely at the July 28, 2020 Planning Commission Meeting, residents must: Call or preferably email the board liaison at 512-974-6508 and andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov (the day before the meeting). The following information is required: 1. The speaker name. 2. Item number(s) they wish to speak on. 3. Whether they are for/against/neutral. 4. Mailing address. 5. Telephone number. Must be the number that will be used to call-in. Failure to provide the required information by noon July 27, 2020 shall render a request null and void. A registered speaker may not sign up another speaker. Previous registration on an item does not automatically roll over. • Once a request to register to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call with additional information regarding the call in process. • Handouts or other information must be emailed to andrew.rivera@austintexas.gov by 1:00 PM Tuesday, July 28, 2020. This information will be provided to Commission members in advance of the meeting. • Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Postponement requests must be submitted to the case manager and Andrew Rivera by 5PM Monday, July 27, 2020 Order of Meeting Determination of Quorum / Meeting Called to Order Reading of Proposed Consent Agenda *Vote and Disposal of Consent Agenda **Determination of Discussion Postponement Items Discussion Cases (Including public comment, staff and applicant / representative presentations) Other Business Adjournment * The consent agenda may be acted upon by one vote without separate discussion. Speakers are allowed to provide testimony on an item proposed for the consent agenda. At the discretion of the Commission the item may remain on the consent agenda. ** Discussion postponement consists of public comment by 2 individuals for the postponement and 2 individuals against the postponement at 2 minutes each per speaker. Testimony should not delve into the merits of the case. The granting of a postponement must be approved by affirmative vote of the Commission. Speaker Applicant / Agent Speakers For Speakers For Primary Speaker Against Speakers Against Speakers Against Speaker Testimony Time Allocation …
C14-2020-0056 1 ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE: C14-2020-0056 – Wickersham Retail DISTRICT: 3 Center ZONING FROM: GR-MU-CO ADDRESS: 4544 E. Oltorf Street SITE AREA: 1.96 acres TO: GR-MU-CO, to change a condition of use PROPERTY OWNER: Wickersham Enterprises, LLC (Abdul Patel) AGENT: Land Answers, Inc. (Jim Wittliff) CASE MANAGER: Kate Clark (512-974-1237, kate.clark@austintexas.gov) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Community Commercial – Mixed Use – Conditional Overlay (GR-MU- CO) combining district zoning. For a summary of the basis of staff’s recommendation, see page 2. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION / RECOMMENDATION: July 28, 2020 Scheduled for Planning Commission July 14, 2020 Approved the EROC Contact Team request for postponement to July 28. 2020 on the consent agenda. [A. Azhar; J. Shieh – 2nd]. Vote 13-0. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: August 27, 2020 Planned to be Scheduled for City Council ORDINANCE NUMBER: ISSUES On July 19, 2020 staff received an email that the EROC Contact Team voted to oppose the rezoning of this property. Staff has received communication both in favor of and in opposition to this rezoning case, please see Exhibit C: Correspondence Received. B-111 of 22 C14-2020-0056 2 CASE MANAGER COMMENTS: This property is approximately 1.96 acres and is currently undeveloped. It is north of the intersection of E. Oltorf Street and Wickersham Lane and is surrounded on all sides with a base zoning of MF-2. In 2013 this property was rezoned from MF-2 to GR-MU-CO. The conditional overlay on the property prohibited a list of land uses and limited the density of the property to 36 residential units per acre, see Exhibit D: Ordinance No. 20130214-066. The applicant is requesting to rezone to GR-MU-CO to remove Part 2 (A) of the existing ordinance to allow for drive-in service as an accessory use to commercial uses. The current ordinance prohibits the following uses which will be carried over if the rezoning request is granted: Automotive repair services Automotive sales Commercial off-street parking Community recreation (public) Congregate living Drop-off recycling collection facility Exterminating services Hospital services-general Hotel-motel BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION: Indoor sports and recreation Off-site accessory parking Outdoor entertainment Pawn shop services Private primary educational services Private secondary educational services Residential treatment Service station Theater 1. The proposed zoning should be consistent with the purpose statement of the district sought. Staff recommends rezoning this property to allow for drive-in service use as an accessory use. The City Code defines the GR district as: intended for …
From: Rodney Ahart Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 12:36 PM To: Chaffin, Heather <Heather.Chaffin@austintexas.gov> Cc: Alice Glasco; Alex Clarke <>; Jaime X. Guerra <>; Scooter Cheatham <> Subject: Case Number: C14-2020-0064 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Ms. Chaffin, The Windsor Park Neighborhood Plan Contact Team (WPNPCT) met Monday, July 20, 2020, to review and discuss its recommendation on Case Number: C14-2020-0064. The proposed project is located at 6007 N IH 35 SVRD NB (former Texas Land & Cattle Restaurant) within the boundaries of the Windsor Park Neighborhood Planning Area. The WPNPCT unanimously supports the zoning request of CS-MU-V-NP to allow approximately 269 multi-family units and approximately 3,000 square feet of general retail with the provision that 10% of the units are affordable at 60% MFI in accordance with the Windsor Park VMU ordinance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Rodney E. Ahart Windsor Park Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, Chair
July 24, 2020 RE: C14-2017-0010 - 4400 Nuckols Crossing Road Rezoning NPA-2016-0014.01 Plan Amendment - 4400 Nuckols Crossing Road Rezoning To Planning Commissioners and City Council Members, Based on updated information received at the 07/08/2020, 07/13/2020 and 07/22/2020 meetings with City Staff, Applicant, Austin Transportation Department, SE Combined Neighborhood Plan Contact Team and concerned neighbors, the Los Arboles Homeowners' Association OPPOSES rezoning 4400 Nuckols Crossing from SF-2-NP to MF-4-NP. Los Arboles consists of 314 single family homes with Viewpoint Dr as the entry into the neighborhood. Some of the considerations for opposition are listed below. 1. The proposed driveway to 4400 Nuckols Crossing will be only 150 ft from Viewpoint Dr on the east side of Nuckols Crossing and a driveway into Woodway Village Apartments on the west side of Nuckols Crossing. The accepted distance between driveways should be 500 ft. The Applicant has proposed a solution to the driveway problem by adding turn lanes in the right of way, possibly with vertical delineators in the middle of Nuckols Crossing. We believe this will cause a major hazard for vehicles turning in and out of Viewpoint Dr and the Woodway Village Apartments driveway and for through traffic on Nuckols Crossing. 3. Traffic on Nuckols Crossing is already 10 times the amount that this road is designed to ideally handle. Traffic counts taken in February 2020 indicate that existing vehicle trips is at 14,929. According to Section 25-6-116 of the Land Development Code, streets which have pavement width less than 30 feet are considered to be operating at an undesirable traffic level if the average daily traffic volume for such roadway exceeds 1,200 vehicles per day. Nuckols Crossing Road is currently operating at an undesirable level and will continue to do so with the addition of site traffic. These statistics, and the opinion that Nuckols Crossing is currently at an undesirable level, are taken directly from the Zoning Review Change Sheet provided by City Staff. The proposed development will add another 979 vehicle trips, an increase of over 13%. 4. The City has no plan to improve this section of Nuckols Crossing/E St Elmo. It is a narrow 2 lane road in very poor condition with no curbs, gutters, sidewalks or bike lanes, or even enough right of way to add them except in front of 4400 Nuckols Crossing. There is a very sharp curve with no sight lines where Nuckols …
Planning Commission Q & A Report July 28, 2020 B-8. Rezoning: C14-2020-0062 - Webberville; District 1 Question Commissioner Shaw: What was the extent of notification to the neighborhood and were there any responses? Did applicant meet with neighbors? Response: This case received all of the regular notification- property owners, utility customers, and registered community groups in a 500-foot radius. Based on my conversations with the agent, the agent says that he has reached out several times but has not ever had a reply from the neighborhood contact. The agent stated that he first contacted the neighborhood group 45 days ago. There have been no meetings.
200 Montopolis Rezoning C14-2020-0030 200 Montopolis Drive City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Site: 200 Montopolis Drive • 1.34 acres 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Imagine Austin Context 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Waterfront Overlay Montopolis River Terrace 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Rezoning Request From: SF-3-NP To: SF-6-NP 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan & FLUM Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Single Family FLUM category includes: • SF-1 • SF-2 • SF-3 • SF-4 • SF-5 • SF-6 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Transportation & ASMP 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Transportation & ASMP 200 Montopolis Rezoning – C14-2020-0030 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Zoning District Comparison Benefits of SF-6: Does not require subdivision into individual lots 25ft. setback from existing single-family (compatibility) Greater tree protections Private drives – privately maintained Private maintenance of open space and …
Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning C14-2020-0044 316 Saxon Lane & 6328 El Mirando Street City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Site: 316 Saxon & 6328 El Mirando • 2.94 acres • Greenfield – Undeveloped Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Context Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Zoning & Rezoning Request Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan & FLUM Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Single Family FLUM category includes: • SF-1 • SF-2 • SF-3 • SF-4 • SF-5 • SF-6 Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Transportation & ASMP Montopolis Drive: < ¼ mile away Existing Bus Service Transit Priority Network Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Zoning District Comparison Benefits of SF-6: Does not require subdivision into individual lots 25ft. setback from existing single-family (compatibility) Private drives – privately maintained Greater tree protections Private maintenance of open space and storm water detention facilities Saxon Acres Residential Rezoning – C14-2020-0044 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Conceptual …
Clovis & Kemp Rezoning C14-2020-0039 6201 Clovis & 301 Kemp Street City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Site: 6201 Clovis & 301 Kemp Street • 1.16 acres • Green, undeveloped land • No displacement Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Context Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Zoning & Rezoning Request From: SF-3-NP To: SF-6-NP Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan & FLUM Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Single Family FLUM category includes: • SF-1 • SF-2 • SF-3 • SF-4 • SF-5 • SF-6 Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Neighborhood Plan Montopolis Neighborhood Plan – September 2001 Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28,2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Zoning District Comparison Benefits of SF-6: Does not require subdivision into individual lots 25ft. setback from existing single-family (compatibility) Private drives – privately maintained Greater tree protections Greater protections for storm water and detention – privately maintained Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Transportation & ASMP Montopolis Drive: Existing Bus Service Transit Priority Network Commuter Transit Service Clovis & Kemp Rezoning – C14-2020-0039 City of Austin – Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E …
City Heights Senior Living 4400 Nuckols Crossing Road Neighborhood Plan Amendment NPA-2016-0014.01.SH Rezoning C14-2017-0010 Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Planning Commission – April 2018 Pause to address: 1. Safe driveway access to the property 2. Opportunity for an Affordable development at this location Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S 10 acres Undeveloped Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Imagine Austin Comprehensive Plan Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S FLUM Amendment Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Rezoning Request Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Affordability 179 units for Seniors only (55 + yrs.) City of Austin Rental Housing Development Assistance Program (RDHA) Requires a minimum 40-year affordability period Governed by a restrictive covenant Texas Dept. of Housing & Community Affairs Restricts land use for a minimum of 30 years Allocation of $22 million in bond funding S.M.A.R.T. Certified Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Unit Mix & Affordability Levels Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Proposed Site Plan Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R S Critical Environmental Features Nuckols Crossing NPA & Rezoning City of Austin Planning Commission – July 28, 2020 Thrower Design L A N D P L A N N E R …
Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Hedda Elias Thursday, July 23, 2020 12:59 PM Clark, Kate Revised letter for backup Montopolis cases *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To Ms. Clark: Please either switch out this letter for the one that is already in the backup for these cases, or include it after the other letter. Thank you! I am writing in opposition to cases C14‐2020‐0039, C14‐2020‐0039 & C14‐2020‐0044. Background The same group of developers is asking for zoning changes to SF‐6 on four different lots in Montopolis. According to UT‐ Austin's report Uprooted, my neighborhood is one of the few that can still be saved from gentrification. Two of these cases are on my small street that is already a major bike throuroghfare with no sidewalks and frequent deer crossings, the same street as the 508 Kemp Street case which was approved for SF‐6 zoning at the planning commission meeting June 23. We already have amenities; we don't need developer promises Know that the sites for 200 Montopolis and Clovis/Kemp have direct access to the public trail into Roy G. Guerrero Park, which has scenic views from the lawn and one of the best playgrounds in the city. The Saxon Acres site is across from Civitan Park. Any promises of playgrounds, scenic views or 1 affordable unit ring hollow in these cases, as they did with 508 Kemp St. In reference to C14‐2020‐0030 & C14‐2020‐0039: No direct access to highway right of way nor major street The city staff recommendation states that 200 Montopolis is bordered by the Hwy 183 right of way. This is inaccurate. This land borders the old Montopolis Bridge and the trail that leads into Roy Guerrero Park and the Lady Bird Lake Hike & Bike trail. The Old Montopolis Bridge is being converted into a bike and pedestrian bridge. Furthermore, this is not the main section of Montopolis Drive. It is a tiny road with unmarked lanes and no sidewalks that turns into a right‐turn only lane onto the main Montopolis Drive just past where it intersects with Clovis/Kemp Street. If drivers from either 200 Montopolis or Clovis/Kemp want to go north or south on Hwy 183 (the only way to head into downtown) they will be coming on Kemp Street to mix with the bicycles that already pass, deer that cross the road from one field to the other and kids that …
Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi, Tim Thomas Tuesday, July 28, 2020 9:50 AM Clark, Kate C14-2020-0056 1 *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** I would like to add my support for removing the drive‐through conditional overlay for case C14‐2020‐0056 1. Currently the only walkable option for food in this area is the Chevron at Pleasant Valley and Oltorf. It is within walking distance of where Mike Ramos was killed by police. Even in the correspondence you have received so far it is clear that the entire point of opposing this change is to keep working class people away from the more affluent neighborhoods at the top of Oltorf and Wickersham. Neighborhoods where homes are fast approaching a million dollars. While I'm an avid supporter of active transportation and support getting rid of *all* drive throughs I do not support allowing home owners to prevent drive‐throughs in their neighborhoods and pushing them into poorer ones. I don't support their desire to, as one EROC Contact Team Member put it, "attract a clean business to our area". Structural racism in Austin is built upon these small conditional overlays. If you look at a 1 mile radius of this house you'll see that the Contact Team has littered every single undeveloped property with poison pills to prevent development in the form of conditional overlays. You have a chance to fight this structural racism and by saying no to the contact team. Thanks, Tim Thomas 3403 Santa Monica Dr, 78741 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to CSIRT@austintexas.gov. 1 Clark, Kate From: Sent: To: Julie Green Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:31 PM ; Ira Strange; Clark, Kate; ; Subject: Re: C14-2020-0056, 4544 E Oltorf *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** To whom it may concern, My name is Julie Green, I serve on the HOA board at Monaco Condominium, located adjacent to the property in question. We are adamantly opposed to having a drive thru service facility as our next door neighbors. This would totally disrupt the community environment of our property. As I have seen in the report from the emails, this is a high traffic area on the corner, and putting a drive thru there would …
ZONING CASE C14-2020-0056 WICKERSHAM IS DESIGNATED AS A HEALTHY STREET WICKERSHAM-OLTORF INTERSECTION There are bike lanes on both Wickersham and Oltorf. Wickersham is designated as a Heathy Street as part of the Country Club Creek Trail. Drive through exits on these streets will create dangerous situations for bike riders. MONTOPOLIS TO WICKERSHAM DISTANCE ON OLTORF WEST-BOUND CARS ON OLTORF ENCOUNTER NO CROSS STREETS OR TRAFFIC LIGHTS FROM MONTOPOLIS TO WICKERSHAM, A DISTANCE OF OVER 1 MILE. THE SPEED LIMIT IS 45 M/HR. HIGH SPEED WEST-BOUND TRAFFIC ON OLTORF West-bound cars on Oltorf crest the hill east of Wickersham at 40 m/hr. This crest is 270 feet east of the Wickersham intersection. At this speed and distance, a west-bound driver has 4.7 seconds to react to a car entering Oltorf at the Wickersham intersection. This is the reason there are many accidents at this intersection. THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD The area around the Wickersham-Oltorf intersection is entirely residential, with condominiums and apartment complexes on all sides. The residents of the adjacent Monaco and Chamonix condominiums oppose drive- through services. The EROC Contact Team has voted to oppose this change. Drive- through services will disrupt the residential character of this area with increased traffic, noise, and lights. RECOMMENDATIONS • Retain the prohibition on drive-through services. • If the Planning Commission does recommend allowing drive- through services, do not allow high traffic volume services like fast food restaurants.
