9 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS MAY 1, 2024 HR-2024-043920 HYDE PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 4110 AVENUE F PROPOSAL Construct a small side addition to a contributing building. Construct a new ADU. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) The proposed side addition to the main house is set back from the front of the building and clad in vertical metal siding. It is tucked beneath the existing roofline. 2) The proposed ADU is located at the rear of the property. It comprises three main flat-roofed rectangular forms with horizontally oriented windows and lightwells between each mass. It is clad in vertical metal siding. ARCHITECTURE One-story Craftsman bungalow. DESIGN STANDARDS The Hyde Park Design Standards are used to evaluate projects within the historic district. The following standards apply to the proposed project: 4. Residential Standards: Additions to Contributing Single Family and Multi-Family Structures 4.1: Preservation of Historic Character The proposed side addition requires removal of minimal historic fabric. 4.2: Location The proposed addition is located at the rear-side of the building. 4.3: Roof, Fenestration, and Siding The proposed addition is tucked beneath the existing roofline. Its siding is somewhat appropriate, though wood siding would be more appropriate. 4.4 Size and Scale of Additions The proposed addition is more than 15’ from the front wall of the house and does not overwhelm the original building. It has the same floor-to-ceiling height as the existing house. 5. Residential Standards: New Construction of Single Family Structures 5.10: Garage Apartments/Secondary Units While the geometry and fenestration of the new building is not typical to the contributing buildings on the block, its small scale is in keeping with other outbuildings in size and placement on the lot; it will be minimally visible from the primary street. Wood siding would be a more appropriate choice than metal for the exterior of the building. Summary The project meets some of the applicable standards. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Hyde Park Historic District. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consider wood as exterior material. The building appears minimally visible from the street, though it does not meet all of the standards for secondary units. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Concur with Committee feedback, approving the application on the condition that the applicant uses wood siding for at least the most visible of the rear-unit masses. LOCATION MAP 9 – 2
From: To: Subject: Date: Grant Thomas, Jr. Fahnestock, Sam 4110 Avenue F: HR case # 2024-043920 Saturday, April 20, 2024 5:15:12 PM You don't often get email from Learn why this is important External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Mr.Fahnestock: Greetings from Avenue F! My wife and I have lived at 4106 Avenue F in Hyde Park ever since we moved to Austin in 1976; and during those years, we have seen and participated in a dramatic transformation; as a once-shoddy dump has turned into a vibrant, attractive model neighborhood. Among the important contributors to that transformation has been the Osborne family, which has been our next-door neighbor since moving here in 2015. In addition to being wonderful neighbors, the Osbornes have a keen appreciation of the special character of the neighborhood. Most recently, this appreciation has been evident in their proposed project at the rear of their property. We have had an opportunity to review various iterations of their plans over the past year, and we appreciate the care that has been taken with the design. Thus we encourage your positive consideration of their proposed plan. Sincerely, Grant and Margot Thomas, 4106 Ave. F CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
From: To: Subject: Date: Jill Nokes Fahnestock, Sam Re: Case Number: HR-2024-043920 Tuesday, April 23, 2024 4:07:34 PM [You don't often get email from https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is important at External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Mr. Fahnestock, I am a neighbor of Mike Osborn and his wife Meggie. My husband and I have lived at 4200 Avenue F, just 2 houses north of the Osborns, for over 30 years, and we raised our family here. Incidentally, our home is also a historic landmark. We have known Mike’s family since they moved in 2015, and find them to be good neighbors and very considerate. Mike showed me the architect's rendering and modeling of their proposed addition, which gave me a good idea of the massing of the addition and the view from the street. It appeared to me to be in scale of the original house, and in the back arranged to be in consideration of the trees, as well as a practical use of the space without overwhelming the lot. Therefore, I am in favor of granting them a building permit so that their family can enjoy staying in the neighborhood with the space they need. Please feel free to contact me with further questions. Sincerely, Jill Nokes 512-296-1188 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS MAY 1, 2024 HR-2023-043027 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1409 ALTA VISTA AVENUE 10 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1926 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story Craftsman with horizontal wood siding, screened wood windows, decorative shutters, a hooded entryway with decorative brackets, and a clipped-gable roof. The house at 1409 Alta Vista Avenue was built around 1926. Until 1947, its occupants were mostly short-term owners and renters, including an engineer, a state highway inspector, an office manager, and a mechanic. The home was then purchased by Frank and Lura Connolly. Frank Connolly was the editor, owner, and publisher of the Texas Tax Journal, while Lura worked both at the journal and as a Red Cross nurse. The Connollys sold the home in the late 1950s to Anna and William Duncum. William Duncum worked as a public school teacher. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Travis Heights-Fairview Park National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of modest Craftsman architecture in Travis Heights. b. Historical association. The property does not appear to have significant historical associations. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not appear to possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property does not appear to be a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Strongly encourage adaptive reuse and rehabilitation, then relocation over demolition, but release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. The Historic Landmark Commission must review plans for new construction in National Register Historic Districts before the permit is released. LOCATION MAP 10 – 2 PROPERTY INFORMATION Photos 10 – 3 10 – 4 Application, 2023 1952 Frank R. & Lura J. Connolly – Texas Tax Journal Publication Co., Littlefield Bldg. Occupancy History City …
Contreras, Kalan Fahnestock, Sam FW: Comparison -- O"Quinn Home to Granger Home Monday, April 29, 2024 8:09:24 AM From: To: Subject: Date: Kalan Contreras MSHP | she/her | Historic Preservation Officer City of Austin Planning Department 512.974.2727 | kalan.contreras@austintexas.gov Please Note: Correspondence and information submitted to the City of Austin are subject to the Texas Public Information Act (Chapter 552) and may be published online. Por Favor Tome En Cuenta: La correspondencia y la información enviada a la Ciudad de Austin está sujeta a la Ley de Información Pública de Texas (Capítulo 552) y puede ser publicada en línea. > From: Duane G Albrecht < Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 3:46 PM To: Contreras, Kalan <Kalan.Contreras@austintexas.gov> Cc: Nicole Kessler Burnett < Subject: Comparison -- O'Quinn Home to Granger Home > External Email - Exercise Caution >; Evy Burnet >; Michael - - - - - - - - - - Kalan M. Contreras Historic Preservation Office Master of Science in Historic Preservation RE: Comparison -- Granger House & O'Quinn House — Arthur Fehr (Fehr & Granger) Hello Kalan Contreras. Of course you know the following. The Granger home is designated and recorded on the US National Register of Historic Places. The Granger home is a Texas Historic Landmark. The Granger home is a City of Austin Historic Landmark. There are some fascinating similarities as one compares "The Granger Home" to “The Trueman Edgar O’Quinn Home”. The archival records at The University of Texas Library show that these two homes were designed by Arthur Fehr and Charles Granger during the same time frame. The projects are listed as Project 150 “Granger Residence” and as Project 151 “ O’Quinn Residence”. There are some remarkable similarities that can be observed. Some of these similarities are illustrated in the images shown below. Once again: Thank you for your knowledgeable dedication to Historic Preservation within the City of Austin. Duane ———--------——— Duane G. Albrecht Professor University of Texas ———--------——— https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/cps/faculty/dga57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Rochlen, Aaron B Contreras, Kalan; HPD Preservation; Fahnestock, Sam; Castillo, Raymond - BC; McWhorter, Trey - BC; Larosche, Carl - BC; BC-Jamie.Alvarez@austintexas.gov; Evans, Roxanne - BC; Rubio, JuanRaymon - BC; Grogan, Harmony - BC; Dudley, Tara - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC Case Number GF 24-030562; Opposition to Demolition of 2307 Windsor Road #2 Monday, April 29, 2024 2:41:32 PM 2342BD21-7162-46FA-BAA4-042861814ECD[47].png External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Chairman and Commissioners, My family and I reside at 2212 East Windsor and have lived in Austin for 24 years. I’m a Professor at UT. Our property is currently next to the 2307 Windsor Road #2 property/home up for demolition consideration. I recently read the email written by Mr. Donosi and thought it was excellent. His email perfectly captured how it meets the criteria for historical designation for the reasons of Architecture, Historical, Associations, and Landscape Features. In this e-mail, I just wanted to go a bit further about the historical importance of the property to the LGBTQ community. Granted, I don’t have the time to line up speakers for this part of the historical importance. But I’ve talked to many leaders in the community to provide the below summary. I also think this is another reason I’d advocate for a “delay” here to gather more information. In the 80’s and 90s, this property where Trueman O’Quinn’s son Kerry lived was a “safe place” for the LGBTQ community in Austin. The property, was referred to as “Camp Queer”, and served as a refuge where gay men were welcome to be themselves and enjoy community. The turquoise gate that was originally from the Texas Capitol building served as a landmark to the gay community. This was a marker of the private space beyond. The bathrooms near the playground and all along Parkway were well known places where gay people met up with essentially the “gay zone” being delineated by the bathrooms to the south and ended with the turquoise gate to the north of this property. Among many artistics interests and accomplishments, Kerry O’Quinn directed a short fillm called “Queerantine.” Obviously you are well aware —— Austin has seen significant threats to the queer built environment. Bars and nightclubs that have long provided Austin’s gay community with safe space have been threatened, and the City has made efforts to include gay history in our Austin story. We believe this …
From: To: Subject: Date: matt culmo HPD Preservation; Contreras, Kalan Review Case Number: GF 24-030562: Request to Utilize Demolition Delay for Historic Property at 2307 Windsor Road Unit 2 Friday, April 26, 2024 8:42:34 PM Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Matthew Culmo, and I am a property owner residing at 2213 E. Windsor Road, Austin, TX 78703. I am writing to formally object to the proposed demolition of the contributing home located within 500 feet of my property. (2307 Windsor Rd Unit 2) I urge the commission to consider the following reasons for my objection: 1. Historical Significance: The home in question is a contributing structure within the National Register Historic District. 2. Architectural Importance: Designed by the renowned Architecture Firm of Fehr and Granger, the property represents a significant example of Mid-Century Modern Architecture, contributing to Austin's architectural legacy. 3. Cultural Heritage: The original owner, Trueman Edgar O'Quinn, was a notable figure in Austin's history and considered one of the city's true founders. 4. Preservation of Historic Features: The stone wall on the property's exterior serves as an important historic landscape feature, adding to the property's overall historical integrity. Given these compelling reasons, I respectfully request that the commission exercise the 180-day demolition delay available for this property. This delay will provide an opportunity to explore alternative options that will allow us to preserve this valuable piece of our city's heritage. Thank you for considering my objections and taking the necessary steps to protect our historic landmarks. Sincerely, Matthew Culmo 2213 E. Windsor Road Austin, TX 78703 Phone: 512-736-6870 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
From: To: Subject: Date: Katy Culmo HPD Preservation; Contreras, Kalan Review Case Number: GF 24-030562: Request to Utilize Demolition Delay for Historic Property at 2307 Windsor Road Unit 2 Friday, April 26, 2024 8:52:19 PM Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Dear Members of the Historic Landmark Commission, My name is Katy Culmo, and I am a property owner residing at 2213 E. Windsor Road, Austin, TX 78703. I am writing to formally object to the proposed demolition of the contributing home located within 500 feet of my property. (2307 Windsor Rd Unit 2) I urge the commission to consider the following reasons for my objection: 1. Historical Significance: The home in question is a contributing structure within the National Register Historic District. 2. Architectural Importance: Designed by the renowned Architecture Firm of Fehr and Granger, the property represents a significant example of Mid-Century Modern Architecture, contributing to Austin's architectural legacy. 3. Cultural Heritage: The original owner, Trueman Edgar O'Quinn, was a notable figure in Austin's history and considered one of the city's true founders. 4. Preservation of Historic Features: The stone wall on the property's exterior serves as an important historic landscape feature, adding to the property's overall historical integrity. Given these compelling reasons, I respectfully request that the commission exercise the 180-day demolition delay available for this property. This delay will provide an opportunity to explore alternative options that will allow us to preserve this valuable piece of our city's heritage. Thank you for considering my objections and taking the necessary steps to protect our historic landmarks. Sincerely, Katy Culmo 2213 E. Windsor Road Austin, TX 78703 Phone: 512-736-6870 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to attend a public hearing, you are not required to attend. However, if you do attend, you have the opportunity to speak FOR or AGAINST the proposed development or change. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person withstanding to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: • • • • • delivering a written statement to the board or commission before the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concern (it may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: occupies a primary residence that is witYiiri 500 feet ofith~ subject properly or proposed deveiopmerrt. is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development? A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal form may be available from the responsible department. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our website: www.austintexas.gov/abc Written comments must be submitted to the board or commission (or the contact person listed on the notice) before a public hearing. Your comments should include the board or commission's name, the scheduled date of the public hearing, the Case Number and the contact person …
From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: Ben Bentzin HPD Preservation; Contreras, Kalan 2307 Windsor Rd Unit 2 objection to demolition Sunday, April 28, 2024 10:07:25 PM 2024-04-28 2307 Windsor Rd Unit 2 objection-Ben Bentzin.pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Attached is my objection to the demolition of 2307 Windsor Rd Unit 2. This home is an excellent example of the Mid-Century Modern architecture of the firm Fehr and Granger. The home’s original owner Trueman Edgar O'Quinn Sr. made significant contributions to the city of Austin as a respected attorney, judge, and historian. He served as Austin's city attorney from 1936 to 1950 (except during his military service in World War II), where he played a key role in health care regulations, the acquisition of land for Bergstrom Air Force Base, and the expansion of Austin's park system. O'Quinn also served on the Third Court of Civil Appeals for 13 years before retiring in 1980. Beyond his legal career, he was a dedicated historian, known for his extensive collection of materials related to short story writer O. Henry, which he donated to the Austin History Center in 1982. O'Quinn's passion for local history and his commitment to public service left a lasting impact on the city of Austin and his home should be preserved. I will be traveling but I would like participate in the hearing by video, could you please provide the details about how I can join and participate? Thank you. Ben Bentzin +1-512-750-9253 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov."
From: To: Subject: Date: City of Austin HPD Preservation Historical Relevance to LGBTQ community 2307 Windsor Road #2 Monday, April 29, 2024 12:14:28 PM This message is from Aaron Rochlen. [ ] Dear HLC Representatives, I'm aware there is quite a bit of discussion going on regarding 2307 Windsor Road #2 -- in terms of a demolition permit being considered and moving forward to more traditional historical documentation (that I definitely support). I am the neighbor of this property, residing at 2212 East Windsor. What is quite clear is some of the historical importance of Trueman O'Quinn and his contributions to the city -- as well as some of the historical and architectural components of this property. Importantly, there is another aspect of the home and property that has been overlooked: The importance of the property to the LGBTQ community from a historical perspective. In the 80’s and 90s, this property where Trueman O’Quinn’s son Kerry lived was a “safe place” for the LGBTQ community in Austin. More research and original resources are needed -- but below is what I've garnered through multiple conversations. The property, was referred to as “Camp Queer”, and served as a refuge where gay men were welcome to be themselves and enjoy community. The turquoise gate that was originally from the Texas Capitol building (this is tremendously important as well) served as a landmark to the gay community. This was a marker of the private space beyond. The bathrooms near the playground and all along Parkway were well known places where gay people met up with essentially the “gay zone” being delineated by the bathrooms to the south and ended with the turquoise gate to the north of this property. Among many artistic interests and accomplishments, Kerry O’Quinn directed a short film called “Queerantine.” This movie briefly tells the story of havoc consuming a high school when students are infected with “The Gay.” Obviously you all are well aware —— Austin has seen significant threats to the queer built environment. Bars and nightclubs that have long provided Austin’s gay community with safe space have been threatened, and the City has made efforts to include gay history in our Austin story. We believe this home should not be demolished, in part due to its historical significance to the gay community and place in our history. I completely understand this is a complicated property to consider. Also …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: John Donisi Contreras, Kalan; HPD Preservation; Fahnestock, Sam Castillo, Raymond - BC; McWhorter, Trey - BC; Larosche, Carl - BC; BC-Jamie.Alvarez@austintexas.gov; Evans, Roxanne - BC; Rubio, JuanRaymon - BC; Grogan, Harmony - BC; Dudley, Tara - BC; Koch, Kevin - BC Case Number GF 24-030562; Opposition to Demolition of 2307 Windsor Road #2 Monday, April 29, 2024 12:58:15 PM Some people who received this message don't often get email from important . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution JOHN PHILIP DONISI Attorney & Counselor at Law 2220 Parkway Austin, Texas 78703 City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY Re: Review Case Number GF 24-030562; 2307 Windsor Road #2 Chairman & Commissioners, I am writing to object to the demolition of the O’Quinn House located at 2307 Windsor #2. I reside at 2220 Parkway, the Snead-Rieck House, a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, across East Windsor from the subject property. I respectfully urge you to initiate historic zoning, or invoke the 180-day demolition delay option available to Contributing Properties in National Register Historic Districts. When we purchased our circa-1935 home 15 years ago, it was in similar condition to the O’Quinn House. There were structural and water intrusion issues, significant updates necessary to plumbing, HVAC and electrical systems, replastering and repointing of original brickwork, and a quarter century of deferred maintenance to address. We viewed the opportunity to restore and reside in this property as a privilege, and we were honored when it was formally designated as a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark by the Texas Historical Commission in 2018. In 2001, primarily in response to a growing number of demolitions, a number of area residents set out to establish the Old West Austin National Register Historic District. Through their efforts and perseverance, the OWANRHD was finally approved in September of 2003. The goal was to document the built history of the 2,525 properties with the hope that developers would have full knowledge which properties were a priority for preservation (the 1,574 contributing structures) and which were not (the 951 non-contributing). The applicant seeks to demolish the O’Quinn House, which is a contributing structure to the OWANRHD. In his correspondence with staff, the applicant acknowledges that he’s aware that the O’Quinn House is within the OWANRHD, but claims ignorance on how to ascertain its status. The OWANRHD, and all of its supporting documentation, …
