HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 PR-2024-108905; GF-2024-122676 OLD WEST AUSTIN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1407 GASTON AVENUE 25 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1950 house. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH One-story hipped-roof early Ranch house with steel casement ribbon windows, painted masonry cladding, and an integrated garage. The house at 1407 Gaston Avenue was constructed in 1950 for Charles Nash and his family. Nash was a prominent Austin businessman who worked as vice-president of Capital Chevrolet, founded by his father John Harvey Nash, for more than 60 years. He purchased the Von Boeckmann-Jones Printing Company and the Stephen F. Austin Hotel (as part of the Seventh and Congress Corporation, which included Austin’s then-mayor Roy Butler, Nash’s father, and Robert Mueller, a businessman and supporter of the 1928 City Plan). He was a director of Austin National Bank and chaired the board of trustees of both the Headliners Club and the Texas Automobile Dealers Association. According to his 2011 obituary, Nash’s legacy as an advocate for the Texas Auto Dealers Association was pivotal to the organization’s success over the years.1 Nash also served as president of the Chamber of Commerce and chairman of the Austin Stock Show. PROPERTY EVALUATION The property contributes to the Old West Austin National Register district. Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it does not meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building does not appear to convey architectural significance. b. Historical association. The property is associated with businessman Charles Nash. c. Archaeology. The property was not evaluated for its potential to yield significant data concerning the human history or prehistory of the region. d. Community value. The property does not possess a unique location, physical characteristic, or significant feature that contributes to the character, image, or cultural identity of the city, the neighborhood, or a particular demographic group. e. Landscape feature. The property is not a significant natural or designed landscape with artistic, aesthetic, cultural, or historical value to the city. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Release the demolition permit upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. Demolition permits in National Register districts may not be pulled until new construction plans have been reviewed by the Historic …
26 – 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION PERMITS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OCTOBER 2, 2024 HR-2024-113685 TRAVIS HEIGHTS-FAIRVIEW PARK NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BOULEVARD PROPOSAL Construct new rear unit and a new pool. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1) Construct a guest house. The proposed new unit will be located behind the main house. The proposed building is one story in height and clad in stucco. It is capped by a cross-gabled roof. Fenestration includes an arched entryway with divided-light windows, full-height divided light windows, and French doors. 2) Construct a pool. The pool will be located between the main house and the guest house. DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Austin’s Historic Design Standards (March 2021) are based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and are used to evaluate projects in National Register districts. The following standards apply to the proposed project: Residential new construction 1. Location The proposed new unit’s location is appropriate for the site and for the district. 2. Orientation The proposed new unit’s orientation is appropriate. 3. Scale, massing, and height The proposed scale, massing, and height are appropriate; the new building does not overwhelm the contributing main house and will be minimally visible from the street. 4. Proportions The new building’s proportions appear compatible. 5. Design and style The building’s design and style appear compatible with the main house and with the district. 6. Roofs The simple roofline is compatible with the main house and with the district. It does not compete with the more dramatic Tudor stylistic influences at the main house. 7. Exterior walls The proposed stucco is compatible. 8. Windows and doors Windows and doors appear compatible. Though the expansive glazing in the arched entry is not generally reflective of the window pattern at the main house, it is appropriate for a secondary building not visible from the street, and offers a beneficial degree of transparency. Summary The project meets the applicable standards. COMMITTEE FEEDBACK Consider changing bracket style at front elevation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Comment on plans. LOCATION MAP 26 – 2
Project Proposal: 1611 Travis Heights Blvd Date: August 28, 2024 Project Overview This proposal outlines the scope of work for the property located at 1611 Travis Heights Blvd. Current Scope Objective: Addition of second unit and modifications to the landscape. 1. Addition of Second Unit (Guest House) o Size: 1,017 square feet o Location: Positioned behind the existing primary dwelling unit along the back fence o Purpose: Provide additional living space for guests 2. Deck 3. Pool o Size: 469 square feet o Dimensions: 12 feet x 24 feet 4. Landscaping Modifications o Scope: To be determined based on the integration of new structures and overall site design 5. Existing Primary Dwelling Unit o No modifications or work to be undertaken at this time 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. WEST (FRONT) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. SOUTH (SIDE) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. NORTH (STREET SIDE) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS NO WORK TO BE DONE TO EXISTING HOUSE. GRAVEL AREAS TO REMAIN. EAST (REAR) ELEVATION 1611 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD SITE PHOTOGRAPHS SECOND UNIT LOCATION SECOND UNIT
HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION DEMOLITION AND RELOCATION PERMITS OCTOBER 2, 2024 PR-2024-096343; GF-2024-101131 5303 SAMUEL HUSTON AVENUE 30 – 1 PROPOSAL Demolish a ca. 1963 church. ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH The main sanctuary is an A-frame structure with vertical stained glass, stacked-limestone cladding, and a central entrance beneath a simple gabled portico. The attached fellowship hall is a one-story extension with a compound hipped and gabled roof and limestone cladding over CMU. Rehoboth Primitive Baptist Church was founded in 1962, according to the Church history archived on the congregation’s website. A group of church elders from two different worship groups met at what was likely the Giese-Stark Store on San Bernard Street to discuss their vision, and by July of 1962, they had broken ground on a new church building at 5303 Samuel Huston Avenue. After the first pastor, Reverend R. H. Howard, left the church in 1967, Reverend R. D. Reese led the congregation until his death in 2005.1 In a 2019 writeup on Mid-Century Modern churches across the state, Preservation Texas defined these structures’ importance to our built environment: In the years following World War II, a mobile and growing population in Texas found the need to build new churches and synagogues in urban, suburban, and even small rural communities across the state. Texas architects designed new structures that reflected a modern age, employing innovative construction methods and new materials resulting in striking progressive sacred places. But in recent years, urban populations have changed, and the demands of 21st- century congregations often cannot be contained in the buildings of the mid-twentieth century. As a result, Midcentury Modern Sacred Places are threatened with destruction as congregations relocate or consolidate and their often-valuable property is sold for redevelopment.2 As a neighborhood-scale place of worship built during this age of evolving modernism, the Rehoboth Primitive Baptist Church’s Mid-Century Modern design language of sweeping eaves and dramatically tapering roofline reflects its founding congregation’s innovation in their desire to unite and uplift their community. PROPERTY EVALUATION Designation Criteria—Historic Landmark 1) The building is more than 50 years old. 2) The building appears to retain high integrity. 3) Properties must meet two criteria for landmark designation (LDC §25-2-352). Staff has evaluated the property and determined that it may meet two criteria for landmark designation: a. Architecture. The building is a good example of mid-century Modern ecclesiastical architecture on a neighborhood scale. b. Historical association. The property is …
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Fahnestock, Sam; Historic Preservation Office Review Case Number: GF 24-101131; PR-2024-096343, 5303 Samuel Huston Ave Wednesday, September 4, 2024 10:27:36 AM image.png [Some people who received this message don't often get email from important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] . Learn why this is External Email - Exercise Caution Hello, Sam, I'm writing in regard to the demolition permit for a property that is next to mine at 1730 Bunche Road Unit B. I am not protesting the demo in of itself, but I did notice that the demo plans neglected to include our three heritage pecan trees that sit between our property and the site that is being demoed. It stood out particularly since our elm tree that is behind our property and nowhere near the demo site IS on the demo plan. It is unlikely that our pecan trees' CRZs are in the demo area but without them being considered on the plan, there really is no way for us to know for sure. One of the tree's canopy does extend at least 6' over the demo site, so I do truly believe it should at least be a documented part of the plan. Is this something that can be reviewed and added to the plan before it moves forward to ensure that the trees will not be endangered or let me know who I should reach out to? See attached for screenshot of demo plan with my approximate drawings of our pecan trees. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Lora Lee Tucker Owner of 1730 Bunche Rd Unit B (512) 350-6967 CAUTION: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious or phishing email, please report it using the "Report Message" button in Outlook. For any additional questions or concerns, contact CSIRT at "cybersecurity@austintexas.gov".
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: PR-2024-026690; GF-2024-043975 HLC DATES: May 1, 2024; June 5, 2024; July 3,2024; August 7, 2024; September 4, 2024; October 2, 2024 PC/CC DATES: TBD APPLICANT: Historic Landmark Commission (owner-opposed) HISTORIC NAME: Romo-Johnson House WATERSHED: Lady Bird Lake ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 900 Spence Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP, East Cesar Chavez NP COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consider historic zoning. Alternately, postpone the public hearing to November 6, 2024, to invite the applicant to the next meeting of the Architectural Review Committee to discuss alternatives to demolition. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the building as meeting the criteria for architecture and historical associations. HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: June 5, 2024 – postpone the public hearing. July 3, 2024 – initiate historic zoning (9-0). September 4, 2024 – postpone the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Association, East Cesar Chavez Neighborhood Plan Contact Team, East Town Lake Citizens Neighborhood Association, El Concilio MexicanAmerican Neighborhoods, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Greater East Austin Neighborhood Association , Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Preservation Austin, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group, Tejano Town, Waterloo Greenway, Willow Spence Historic District Neighborhood Assn. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The 2016 East Austin Historic Resource Survey recommends the building as eligible for designation as a local landmark, contributing to a potential local historic district, and individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The survey notes that it is significant as an exemplar of Austin’s residential development at the start of the twentieth century, though the property does not appear to be associated with significant individuals, and the house’s occupancy history is a good example of the overall settlement patterns of the district. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly …
ZONING CHANGE REVIEW SHEET CASE NUMBER: PR-2024-021145; GF-2024-043942 HLC DATE: May 1, 2024 (Commission postponement); June 5, 2024 (applicant postponement); July 3, 2024 (applicant postponement); August 7, 2024 (applicant postponement); September 4, 2024 (Commission initiation) PC DATE: TBD CC Date: TBD APPLICANT: Holly Arthur HISTORIC NAME: Effie Esler Yerwood House WATERSHED: Waller Creek ADDRESS OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE: 1205 Cotton Street ZONING CHANGE: SF-3-NP to SF-3-H-NP (Central East Austin NP: Subdistrict 1) COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend the proposed zoning change from family residence-neighborhood plan (SF- 3-NP) to family residence-historic landmark-neighborhood plan (SF-3-H-NP) combining district zoning. Should the Commission decide against recommendation of historic zoning to Planning Commission and Council, strongly encourage rehabilitation and adaptive reuse, then relocation over demolition, and release the demolition permit only upon completion of a City of Austin Documentation Package. QUALIFICATIONS FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION: architecture, community value, and historical associations HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION ACTION: May 1, 2024 – postpone the public hearing to June 5, 2024. September 4, 2024 – initiate historic zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: CASE MANAGER: Kalan Contreras, 512-974-2727 NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATIONS: Austin Independent School District, Austin Lost and Found Pets, Austin Neighborhoods Council, Del Valle Community Coalition, East Austin Conservancy, Friends of Austin Neighborhoods, Homeless Neighborhood Association, Neighborhood Empowerment Foundation, Neighbors United for Progress, Organization of Central East Austin Neighborhoods, Preservation Austin, Robertson Hill Neighborhood Association, SELTexas, Sierra Club, Austin Regional Group DEPARTMENT COMMENTS: The East Austin Historic Resource Survey (2016) lists the property as not eligible for individual local or national designation; however, no occupancy research was completed for the property at that time and the association with Mrs. Yerwood was not evaluated. The East Austin Historic Resource Survey notes that the building does not appear to convey architectural significance; however, it is an intact example of a modest Craftsman bungalow. BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: § 25-2-352(3)(c)(i) Architecture. The property embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a recognized architectural style, type, or method of construction; exemplifies technological innovation in design or construction; displays high artistic value in representing ethnic or folk art, architecture, or construction; represents a rare example of an architectural style in the city; serves as an outstanding example of the work of an architect, builder, or artisan who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state, or nation; possesses cultural, historical, or architectural value as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian or vernacular …
August 26, 2024 Historic Land Commission City of Austin 301 W 2nd Street Austin TX 78701 Re: Ownership Opposition to Historic Zoning – PR-2024-042274 – 1205 Cotton St. Dear Commissioners, As the owner of 1205 Cotton Street, Austin TX 78702, we hereby object to the staff recommendation to initiate historic designation, zoning or otherwise require documentation package before issuing the demolition permit for case PR-2024-042274 – 1205 Cotton St. We have enclosed with this letter a package supporting this opposition and demolition. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Enclosure Very truly yours, Sara D’Agostini Structural Engineering Evaluation Report Property Address: 1205 Cotton St., Austin, TX Prepared by: Aaron Weaver Date: 07-22-2024 Prepared for: Sara Dagostini 1. Introduction This report presents an evaluation performed by TCB Structural, LLC of the structural integrity and safety of the property located at 1205 Cotton St., Austin, TX. Our objective is to assess whether the property should be preserved or demolished, focusing on the severe safety concerns and structural deficiencies identified during our inspection. Based on our findings, we strongly recommend the demolition of the existing structure to allow for the construction of a new residence, as this is the most practical and safest solution, meeting contemporary performance expectations and building codes. 2. Property Description 3. Methodology The subject property is an older residential home with various additions made over the years. Both the main structure and the rear addition exhibit significant structural issues that compromise their integrity and safety. The property's age and the cumulative impact of inadequate maintenance have led to numerous critical concerns that would demand immediate attention. Our evaluation was conducted through an extensive visual inspection of both external and internal areas of the property, including the foundation, attic, and structural framing. Photographs and detailed notes were documented to support our findings. The inspection methodology included: • Comprehensive visual assessment of the foundation, including the pier and beam foundation system. • Detailed examination of the structural framing, focusing on the floor and ceiling joists and girders and roof and wall framing in both the main house and the rear addition. • • In-depth inspection of the roof and attic, noting any deterioration or structural deficiencies. Evaluation of the exterior walls and overall structural integrity. • Assessment of the interior condition, including electrical wiring, ventilation, and other critical systems. Mailing: 5900 Balcones Drive STE 16692 Austin, TX 78731 Phone # …
1205 COTTON STREET APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N 1 2 0 5 C O T T O N S T R E E T . A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 0 2 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | O C T O B E R 2 0 2 4 | 1 of 13 1205 Cotton - The property owners’ intention is to build a 2-story single family home with a detached garage. They bought the property for the size of the lot and its location. FRONT YARD SIDE YARD CONTEXT PLAN NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BUILDING BUILT IN 1932, WITH LATER ADDITIONS. GARAGE (NOT ORIGINAL) SIDE YARD PROJECT OVERVIEW H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N 1 2 0 5 C O T T O N S T R E E T . A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 0 2 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | O C T O B E R 2 0 2 4 | 2 of 13 The East Austin Historic Resource Survey (2016) lists the property as not eligible for individual local or national designation as a historic landmark. The survey found that the home lacks noteworthy architectural attributes. 2016 EAST AUSTIN HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY H I S T O R I C L A N D M A R K C O M M I S S I O N 1 2 0 5 C O T T O N S T R E E T . A U S T I N , T X 7 8 7 0 2 P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N | O C T O B …
1 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, September 4th, 2024 – 6:00 PM City Hall – Council Chambers 301 W. 2nd Street Austin, TX 78701 Some members of the Commission may be participating by videoconference. The meeting may be viewed online at: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live. Public comment will be allowed in-person or remotely via telephone. Speakers may only register to speak on an item once either in-person or remotely and will be allowed up to three minutes to provide their comments. Registration no later than noon the day before the meeting is required for remote participation by telephone. To register to speak remotely, email preservation@austintexas.gov or call Sam Fahnestock at (512) 974-3393. COMMISSION MEMBERS: Ben Heimsath, Chair x Witt Featherston, Vice Chair x Kevin Koch x Carl Larosche x Trey McWhorter x Harmony Grogan x x x ab x x Jaime Alvarez Roxanne Evans Raymond Castillo JuanRaymon Rubio Tara Dudley DRAFT MINUTES CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: GENERAL The first (10) speakers who register to speak no later than noon the day before the meeting will be allowed a three-minute allotment to address their concerns regarding items not posted on the agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. August 7, 2024 – Offered for consent approval. MOTION: Approve the minutes per passage of the consent agenda on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. BRIEFINGS 2. Briefing on the Heritage Preservation Grant Launch Presenter: Kristina Koufos, Parks and Recreation Department CONSENT/CONSENT POSTPONEMENT AGENDA Historic Zoning Applications 3. 9037 Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail Council District 9 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed August 7, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the October 2, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to October 2, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. 4. 1300 Springdale Rd. Council District 1 Proposal: Commission-initiated historic zoning. (Postponed August 7, 2024) Applicant: HLC City Staff: Kalan Contreras, Historic Preservation Office, 512-974-2727 Staff Recommendation: Postpone to the October 2, 2024 meeting. MOTION: Postpone the public hearing to October 2, 2024, per passage of the consent postponement agenda, on a motion by Commissioner Koch. Commissioner McWhorter seconded the motion. Vote: 10-0. The motion passed. Item 5 was pulled for discussion. Item 6 was pulled for discussion. Item 7 …
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum September 29, 2024 HR-2024-095214 - 701 Baylor Street - Castle Hill Local Historic District Council District 9- Agenda Item 10 Dear Chair Heimsath and HLC Commissioners. The Old West Austin Neighborhood Association (OWANA) supports the second-floor addition at the center-to-rear of the house located at 701 Baylor Street. Considering the small lot size, heritage live oak tree, and being respectful of neighbors views the design has done its best to meet the design standards of the Castle Hill Local Historic District. Sincerely, Christopher Hurst, AIA OWANA Steering Committee Chair
1703 Newning Avenue Respectfully request that you approve the application • General agreement an historic home would be out of place on this lot o Surrounded by modern homes, multi-unit STR, & non-contributing townhomes • SRCC Neighborhood Association sent letter stating not opposing o Recognizing vacant lot in section with atypical, non-contributing properties • Several emails were sent in support of project • Neighbors in vicinity would like to see this completed as soon as practical o Have endured 5+ years of construction with neighboring properties o Negative impact on several short-term rental businesses o Fenced in site more desirable than land under excavation with porta potty Prior Travis Heights Projects that went to HLC (Addressing Commissioner Koch’s question @ 9/4 Meeting) HR-2021-000075: 1311 Alta Vista Avenue Proposal: Demolish a ca. 1957 contributing duplex and construct a new house Staff Recommendation: Approved by staff in advance of March meeting - Was scheduled for canceled February - Did not meet criteria for landmark designation Public: No comments HLC Action: Minutes noted that permit was released administratively HR-2022-011680: 700-702 E. Monroe Street Proposal: Demolish a ca. 1956 contributing duplex and construct a new house Staff Recommendation: Comment on & release the plans Public: SRCC Neighborhood Association objection & 3 comments - One to replace w/duplex of low-income housing; second to “save the tree” HLC Action: Released plans after discussion 1311 Alta Vista Ave 700 E. Monroe Street
September 30, 2024 To: City of Austin, Historic Landmark Commission Re: PR-2024-096343 – 5303 Samuel Huston Ave, District 1 From: EMLK Neighborhood Plan Contact Team Hi Sam Fahnestock, Kalan Contreras, Witt Featherston and Commissioners, This letter is in reference to a case at the Historic Landmark Commission, PR-2024-096343 – 5303 Samuel Huston Ave in Council District 1. One of our Co Chairs, Dianna Dean, has been in contact with DAR Construction, Mike Speciale. Dianna attended the Historic Landmark Commission meeting on Sept 4, 2024. The item was postponed during that meeting and is expected to be on the Oct 2 meeting. During the Sept 15, 2024 EMLK Contact Team meeting, we discussed this case. We had no objections to the proposal to approve demolition of the church building, as long as the following requests are both met: ● Save the historic oak tree on the property and incorporate it into the new structure’s layout. ● The community would like reuse of the cornerstone. A community member can pick up the cornerstone once it is detached from the building. Thank you for considering our input, EMLK Contact Team
EQUITY-BASED PRESERVATION PLAN RECOMMENDATION Historic Landmark Commission Recommenda(cid:415)on 20241002-31 WHEREAS, the City of Aus(cid:415)n Historic Landmark Commission (the Commission) was established in 1974 to promote historic preserva(cid:415)on ac(cid:415)vi(cid:415)es in Aus(cid:415)n and advise the Aus(cid:415)n City Council on ma(cid:425)ers related to historic preserva(cid:415)on; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Commission is to prepare and periodically revise an inventory of the structures and areas that may be eligible for designa(cid:415)on as historic landmarks, most recently completed in 1984; prepare, review, and propose amendments to a citywide Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Plan, last adopted in 1981; and review requests to establish or remove a historic designa(cid:415)on and make recommenda(cid:415)ons on the requests to the Land Use Commission; and WHEREAS, since its establishment the Commission has successfully recommended designa(cid:415)on of 676 historic landmarks and 8 historic districts, stewarded changes to those proper(cid:415)es through administra(cid:415)ve and Commission review, partnered with historic landmark and historic district owners to maintain the integrity of individual proper(cid:415)es and historic districts, overseen historic resource surveys to iden(cid:415)fy poten(cid:415)al historic resources, and recommended heritage tourism grants for projects benefi(cid:427)ng tourists and conven(cid:415)on delegates; and WHEREAS, the Commission has increasingly recognized the limita(cid:415)ons of exis(cid:415)ng programs and tools to accomplish its mission; and WHEREAS, City preserva(cid:415)on efforts, in spite of many successes, have historically not reflected the full history of the city and its many diverse communi(cid:415)es; and WHEREAS, the Commission’s work has largely been reac(cid:415)ve to development pressures, a rising number of demoli(cid:415)on applica(cid:415)ons, and increasing displacement of long(cid:415)me communi(cid:415)es; and WHEREAS, na(cid:415)onal preserva(cid:415)on efforts and best prac(cid:415)ces in other ci(cid:415)es have grown to emphasize the value of historic and cultural resources that reflect more diverse histories and communi(cid:415)es, tools to recognize and support cultural heritage such as legacy businesses, preserva(cid:415)on’s contribu(cid:415)ons to environmental sustainability and affordability, and more expansive and inclusive community engagement; and WHEREAS, the Commission and the Historic Preserva(cid:415)on Office seek to respond to 21st- century challenges with improved and new policies, programs, and tools, including transparent and accessible historic review processes, inclusive community outreach, and incen(cid:415)ves that meet both historic preserva(cid:415)on and equity goals; and 1 WHEREAS, the Commission created a 26-member community working group, the Preserva(cid:415)on Plan Working Group (the Working Group), on June 28, 2021, to develop a dra(cid:332) of an equity-based historic preserva(cid:415)on plan between July 2021 and June 2022 (phase 1 of the planning process); and WHEREAS, Working Group members are representa(cid:415)ve of Aus(cid:415)n’s racial …
GUIDELINES FOR SIGNS IN NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS OR AT A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK The Historic Landmark Commission and City Historic Preservation Office consider the following guidelines in reviewing sign applications. Number of Signs: The Commission allows one sign per building, unless the building has multiple tenants; in this case, the Commission may allow one sign per façade module, if the façade modules correspond to tenant spaces. The Commission may also allow one sign for each street frontage if the building is at an intersection. A single directory sign is appropriate for a large building with multiple tenants. Sign Types: The Commission may allow window signs, awning signs, projecting signs, and flush mounted signs for most commercial buildings. Freestanding signs are allowed for office and retail uses in historic residential buildings. City codes prohibit the Commission from approving the following sign types: (1) rotating, (2) off- premise, (3) roof signs, (4) portable, or (5) signs which flash or blink at intervals. City code also prohibits handbills, posters, or placards on a structure except inside a window or on a bulletin board. Sign Size: The maximum size for signs depends on the sign type: 1. 2. Projecting (blade) signs: Flush-mounted signs: 6 square feet 7% of the overall façade area, with a maximum height of 2 feet and a maximum size of 20 square feet The lesser of 20% of the window or 8 square feet The lesser of 20% of the awning panel or 8 square feet. Window signs: Awning signs: 3. 4. Large commercial buildings (over 3 stories): Cumulative signage may not exceed 40 square feet per façade and must comply with a signage plan for the building. A license agreement may be required for any signs or awnings which project over city right-of-way. Please call 974-8091 for more information. Sign Design, Coloring and Materials: Use simple shapes, such as rectangular or oval signs. The Commission recommends painted wood or metal signs with matte finishes for all signs; plastic, reflective materials, and unfinished surfaces are not allowed. Limit the colors used in a sign to no more than three. For sites with multiple signs, all signs should have corresponding or matching designs, coloring and materials. Signs should match or complement the existing color scheme of the building to the maximum extent feasible. Lettering: No more than two typefaces are allowed. Avoid lettering which appears too contemporary in the sign. …
Steering Committee Members: Christopher Hurst AIA, Chair Paula Hern, Meghan Yancy, Claudette Kazzoun, Rob Kish, Steve Amos, Germaine Curry, Margaret Sullivan, William Osborn, David Schofman, Shawn Shillington, Erika Tatum September 24, 2024 1106 Elm Street -2024-110759 HR RE: 1106 Elm Street Dear Chair Heimsath and Historic Landmark Commissioners, OWANA supports the second floor addition and renovations to 1106 Elm Street. It is a delightful example of Bungalow architecture and the second floor addition will enhance the massing of street elevation removing elements added in the 1994 addition. The applicant met with the OWANA zoning committee in August. As a contributing structure, retaining the front hip roof and matching it on second floor won the support of OWANA. Sincerely, Donna Osborn OWANA Zoning Committee
