D.3.2 - 1113 W. 22nd Half St - Owner petition — original pdf
Backup
Historic Landmark Commission Homepage
D.3.3 - 1113 W. 22nd Half St - Agent presentation — original pdf
Backup
D.3.a - 1113 W. 22nd Half St - Citizen Comments — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Allie Runas < > Monday, September 21, 2020 4:01 PM PAZ Preservation Written Comment in Support of GF 20-119343 1113 W 22nd Half Street *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hi, I would like to register a written comment in support of GF 20‐119343 ‐ 1113 W 22nd Half Street. I am a resident at 2202 Leon Street and live within 500 ft of the project. The project includes an ADU which supports goals to increase missing middle housing, especially in such a lively, walkable area of Austin. I think it will be exciting to have more neighbors get to enjoy our lovely corner of West Campus. Please let me know if there is anything additional I must do to ensure my comments are included in backup. Thank you, Allie Runas ‐‐ Allison Paige Runas | (210)241-1180 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Karen R Pope, PhD, Board Chair, NCHM2310 San Gabriel -- Neill-Cochran House MuseumI represent the 600 statewide owners of the historic House and slave quarters built by Abner Cook in 1855Our museum offers Austin history with an emphasis on early Austin, Wheatville, and the historic neighborhood. We oppose the project named in this form because it destroys yet another piece of the historic neighborhood andthe context of the Neill-Cochran House Museum, including use, scale, architectural style, and history(cid:195)September 24, 2020 From: Sent: To: Subject: Bridges, Barbara S < Monday, September 28, 2020 11:43 AM PAZ Preservation Case number GF 20-119343 - 1113 W 22nd Half St on September 28, 2020 agenda > Gaudette, Angela Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** ATTN: Angela Gaudette I object. I would like to request a continuance until we can see the design plans. Barbara S. Bridges 1106 W. 22 ½ St. Austin, TX 78705 CAUTION: This email was received at the City of Austin, from an EXTERNAL source. Please use caution when clicking links or opening attachments. If you believe this to be a malicious and/or phishing email, please forward this email to cybersecurity@austintexas.gov. 1 Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: User Account < Monday, September 28, 2020 1:35 PM …
D.3.b - 1113 W. 22nd Half St - Caswell Heights NA correspondence — original pdf
Backup
D.4.a - 2505 Park View Drive - pictures submitted by Mr. Packard — original pdf
Backup
D.4.b - 2505 Park View Drive - citizen comments — original pdf
October 25, 2020 Terri Myers, Chair City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: 2505 and 2507 Park View Drive Dear Chair, Preservation Austin has been our city’s leading nonprofit voice for historic preservation since 1953. We write today to express our dismay at the proposed demolition of 2505 and 2507 Park View Drive in the Air-Conditioned Village. We ask the Historic Landmark Commission to support historic zoning for these significant properties in the areas of Architecture, Historical Associations, and Community Value. The Air-Conditioned Village was built in 1954 to assess the cost-effectiveness and profitability of central air in middle-class housing. Twenty-three houses, each featuring air-conditioning systems from a different manufacturer, were sold to families who agreed to allow their homes and habits to be studied by University of Texas scientists. Austinite Ned Cole, an architect and head of the air-conditioning subcommittee of the National Association of Homes Builders, spearheaded the project, which was the first multi-home experiment of its kind worldwide. Local architects and builders designed each unique home with energy-saving design elements to test their effectiveness. 2505 Park View Drive, known as the “Frigidaire House,” retains integrity and clearly conveys its historical significance. Preservation Austin believes the property meets the following criteria for historic zoning: Architecture: The house embodies several of the hallmarks of the Ranch style, including the long, low configuration, deep eaves, and prominent low front porch. Although the house has been somewhat modified, its original form and contextual appearance remains intact. The house was specifically designed as a modest house to test the ability to provide central air conditioning in homes for the middle class. The Air-Conditioned Village was an internationally renowned experiment in building innovation and social science. Its success impacted the architecture and economics of air-conditioning for homebuilders and their middle-class audience. The house was designed by Ned Cole, who was instrumental in bringing the experiment of central air conditioning to Austin and who was noted for his innovative architectural designs using prefabricated elements - - - - Historical Associations: Community Value: - The Air-Conditioned Village is embedded in Austin’s identity. Cole convinced organizers to locate the project here because of Austin’s hot temperatures, booming Sun Belt economy, and proximity to the University of Texas, a prominent research institution. This beloved historic resource is part of Allandale’s cultural fabric and an irreplaceable hallmark of Austin’s significant postwar heritage. 2507 Park View Drive retains integrity …
D.4.c - 2505 Park View Drive - citizen comments — original pdf
Backup
D.5.a - 2507 Park View Drive - citizen comments — original pdf
October 25, 2020 Terri Myers, Chair City of Austin Historic Landmark Commission Re: 2505 and 2507 Park View Drive Dear Chair, Preservation Austin has been our city’s leading nonprofit voice for historic preservation since 1953. We write today to express our dismay at the proposed demolition of 2505 and 2507 Park View Drive in the Air-Conditioned Village. We ask the Historic Landmark Commission to support historic zoning for these significant properties in the areas of Architecture, Historical Associations, and Community Value. The Air-Conditioned Village was built in 1954 to assess the cost-effectiveness and profitability of central air in middle-class housing. Twenty-three houses, each featuring air-conditioning systems from a different manufacturer, were sold to families who agreed to allow their homes and habits to be studied by University of Texas scientists. Austinite Ned Cole, an architect and head of the air-conditioning subcommittee of the National Association of Homes Builders, spearheaded the project, which was the first multi-home experiment of its kind worldwide. Local architects and builders designed each unique home with energy-saving design elements to test their effectiveness. 2505 Park View Drive, known as the “Frigidaire House,” retains integrity and clearly conveys its historical significance. Preservation Austin believes the property meets the following criteria for historic zoning: Architecture: The house embodies several of the hallmarks of the Ranch style, including the long, low configuration, deep eaves, and prominent low front porch. Although the house has been somewhat modified, its original form and contextual appearance remains intact. The house was specifically designed as a modest house to test the ability to provide central air conditioning in homes for the middle class. The Air-Conditioned Village was an internationally renowned experiment in building innovation and social science. Its success impacted the architecture and economics of air-conditioning for homebuilders and their middle-class audience. The house was designed by Ned Cole, who was instrumental in bringing the experiment of central air conditioning to Austin and who was noted for his innovative architectural designs using prefabricated elements - - - - Historical Associations: Community Value: - The Air-Conditioned Village is embedded in Austin’s identity. Cole convinced organizers to locate the project here because of Austin’s hot temperatures, booming Sun Belt economy, and proximity to the University of Texas, a prominent research institution. This beloved historic resource is part of Allandale’s cultural fabric and an irreplaceable hallmark of Austin’s significant postwar heritage. 2507 Park View Drive retains integrity …
D.5.b - 2507 Park View Drive - citizen comments — original pdf
Backup
D.6.1.a - 1806 Travis Heights Blvd - Updated Plans — original pdf
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R 1806 TRAVIS HEIGHTS BLVD REMODEL/ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 11 BLK 21 TRAVIS HEIGHTS ZONING: SF-3-NP PROJECT SUMMARY: TOTAL SITE: 6,847 SF REMODEL AREA: ADDITION AREA: NEW DECK (100%): 1,160 SF 708 SF 721 SF ZONING: WATERSHED: FLOODPLAIN: SF-3-NP BLUNN CREEK NO BUILDING AREA BLDG COVERAGE: 1,160 SF 1,278 SF NEW BLDG CVRG: 18.67% ALLOWABLE FAR: 2,739 SF EXISTING FAR: EXISTING % FAR: 1,160 SF 16.94 % PROPOSED FAR: 1,868 SF PROPOSED % FAR: 27.28 % IMPERVIOUS COVER ALLOWABLE I.C: 3,081 SF EXISTING I.C. PROPOSED I.C. 2,502 SF 36.54% 2,601 SF 37.98 % EXISTNG FOOTRPINT: 1,160 SF ADTL. FOOTPRINT: 118 SF CONC. DRIVE/STAIRS: 636 SF NEW DECK 754SF@50% 377 SF SET STONE WALL/EDGE 192 SF EXISTING CONC. WALL 100 SF 2 AC PADS: 18 SF NEW IMPERVOUS: 2,601 SF NOTES: SHEET INDEX: 00 LOCATION/SUMMARY RENDERINGS 01 SP1 EXIST/NEW SITEPLAN SP2 SITE AREA TOTALS SP3 FRONT YARD TOTALS A.1.0 DEMO PLAN A1.1 FLOOR PLANS ROOF PLAN A1.2 A1.3 FLOORING A1.4 CEILING MTRLS A1.5 LIGHTING POWER A1.6 A1.7 HVAC WINDOWS A1.8 A1.9 DOORS A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVS A2.2 EXTERIOR ELEVS A3.1 INTERIOR ELEVS A3.2 INTERIOR ELEVS A3.3 INTERIOR ELEVS A3.4 INTERIOR ELEVS A3.4 INTERIOR ELEVS A4,1 DETAILS S0.0 STRUCTURAL NOTES S1.0 FOUNDATION S1.1 2ND/ROOF FRAMING S2 DORMER FRAMING S3.0 FRAMING DETAILS S4.0 ROOF DETAILS S4.1 TRUSS DETAILS S5.0 BRACING/DECKING S5.1 HEADER/STUD DTILS GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR (GC) SHALL FULLY COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNING CODES, INCLUDING ALL ADDITIONAL STATE AND LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE GC SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY WORK KNOWINGLY PERFORMED CONTRARY TO SUCH LAWS, ORDINANCES, & REGULATIONS. THE GC SHALL ALSO PERFORM COORDINATION WITH ALL UTILITIES AND STATE SERVICE AUTHORITIES. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALL HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. THE GC SHALL FAMILIARIZE THEMSELF WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND NOTIFY THIS OFFICE OF ANY DISCREPENCY THAT THEY MAY IDENTIFY OR ANY ITEM NEEDING FURTHER ATTENTION. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF FINISHED MATERIALS. THE GC SHALL VERIFY AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS (INCLUDING ROUGH OPENINGS) AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB AND MUST NOTIFY THIS OFFICE OF ANY VARIATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS. THE GC IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AND PROPER FUNCTION OF PLUMBING, HVAC, AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS. THE GC SHALL NOTIFY THIS …
D.6.a - 1806 Travis Heights Blvd - citizen comment — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Paula Kothmann Sunday, October 25, 2020 11:42 AM PAZ Preservation Paula Kothmann Item D6 1806 Travis Heights Boulevard *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Dear Commissioners: I respectfully ask for your consideration to postpone your decision on the proposed alterations to this home, especially since Travis Heights Boulevard is such an important street for our newly designated Historic District, thus for the City. Part of the benefit of a Historic Neighborhood is that it's a tourist attraction, like Monument Drive in Richmond (w/o the sticky Civil War controversy). If Travis Heights Boulevard becomes lined with a lot of modern homes that vary greatly in design and scale from those around it, the street will lose its appeal as a tourist attraction. Compare this historic neighborhood in San Diego: https://www.sandiegorealestatehunter.com/blog/5-reasons-burlingame-san- diego-great-place-live/ . Many of you may be more familiar with Monte Vista in San Antonio. What can be done to deter the deterioration of these homes that still have many decades of shelter to give? Doesn't preservation align with the City's Austin Resource Recovery's goal to prevent waste while keeping our community clean? Maintenance grants I believe that we need some kind of grant program to help homeowners maintain their homes. I will be attending a conference next week of the National Trust on Historic Preservation. I'm especially interested in topics that will be discussed related to: Preservation and Equity, Preservation and Affordable Housing, and Preservation and Diversity. The Travis Heights/Fairview Park Historic District was not always a neighborhood for people who could pay over $1M for their homes. As a realtor I know that only a very small percentage of home buyers can qualify at this price point. New builds are quickly eroding the economic diversity we currently cherish. Yet many of the lower, moderate, and fixed-income residents who bought their homes in our neighborhood when prices were more affordable struggle to stay in their homes. The very high property taxes ($12,000+ annually) deplete their housing budgets so that they have little money left over to care for their aging homes as they may wish. Perhaps the City could give people a break on their property taxes commensurate with the money that they spend to preserve their homes. I have contacted the City about possible maintenance grants as well as incentives to convert an old garage into an income-producing …
D.7.b - 4509 Balcones Dr - Applicant's presentation — original pdf
53'-0 3/4" D R AIN N E W O A D N E S T DITIO O R Y N D RAIN ELE C A N T D M E RIC P T E R A N EL D R AIN D R AIN E X G. O W O O H O U N E S D F T R A SE M E O R Y R E M O D EL D SIL E T T FE AIL 1/S N C E SEE P 1 9 6'-0 1/2" 5'-7 3/4" R29'-2 1/4" CRZ R15'-2 1/4" 1 2 CRZ 1 8'-1 0 1/2" R 8'-2 1/4" 1 4 C R Z M U 2 L 8" DIA. TI-S O A K T E M P R E R E V I M O O U D E L S F R D O O N T O R E X G. G A R A G E 18'-8 1/4" WIDTH OF OF GARAGE LOT 5 BLOCK M PREVIOUS LANDSCAPE REMODEL (ENLARGED DRIVEWAY) 9 3'-1 1 3/4" R35'-3 3/4" CRZ R 1 8'-5" 1 2 C R Z R 9 '- 1 0 1 / 2 " 1 4 C R Z PREVIOUS LANDSCAPE REMODEL M U C E D A 3 3.9" DIA. T E M L TI-S R EL M TRUE 4509 BALCONES DRIVE B A L C O N E S D R V E I T R U E SITE PLAN (22X34 SHEET) SCALE = 1/16" = 1'-0" (11X17 SHEET) SCALE = 1/32" = 1'-0" SITE KEY PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION ITEM ON SITE TO BE DEMOLISHED PROTECTED (OR) HERITAGE TREE CRZ TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE AND CANOPY WOOD FENCE METAL FENCE OVERHEAD LINE UTILITY POLE WATER METER ELECTRIC PANEL & METER GAS METER WM EM G NICK DEAVER Architect 606 Highland Avenue Austin, Texas 78703 www.nickdeaver.com REVISIONS 1. 08.20.20 07.27.20 PHASE: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PROJECT: TREMBLAY Residence 4509 BALCONES DR. AUSTIN, TX 78731 PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWING NAME: SITE PLAN DRAWN BY: JD CHECKED BY: JOB #: ND 278 FILE: 278 TREMBLAY C 2020 nickdeaverarchitect 07.27.20 DATE: SCALE: SHEET: SP1.0 " 2 - ' 3 STONE TOP " 4 1 1 1 - ' 8 " 1 - ' 3 T VERIFY KITCHEN TILE " 4 1 8 - ' 2 ISLAND Q R S BEDROOM 1 WOOD BEDROOM 2 WOOD LVING RM WOOD DINING RM …
D.9.a - 906 E 13th St - applicant's request for postponement — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Richard Mathias < Saturday, October 24, 2020 10:27 AM Gaudette, Angela Contreras, Kalan; Brummett, Elizabeth 2020-136675 PR > Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Completed *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** Hello Angela: I have been retained by the owner of the property referenced above. It is my understanding that this case is scheduled for the Historic Landmark Commission on Monday 10/26/2020. Given the fact that City staff has recommended denial of the demolition permit and instead, asking the commission to consider initiating Historic Zoning of the property, we respectfully request a postponement of this case to the next available meeting date. I need time to get familiar with the property before I can adequately represent my client. I would like to speak with you about this property and get a better understanding of the issues and reasoning behind your recommendation. You can call me at the number listed below when it is convenient. I look forward to speaking with you about this case. Please confirm that the case has or will be postponed at your earliest convenience. Respectfully, Richard Mathias MATHIAS COMPANY Land Development Consultants Celebrating 36 Years of Service 5800 Monmarte Cove Austin, TX 78744 512-844-1644 1
D.9.b - 906 E 13th St - citizen comment — original pdf
P U B L IC H E A R I NG INFORMATION Although applicants and/or their agent(s) are expected to attend a public hearing, you are not required to attend. This meeting will be conducted online and you have the opportunity to speak F OR or A G A I N ST the proposed development or change. Email or call the staff contact for information on how to participate in the public hearings online. You may also contact a neighborhood or environmental organization that has expressed an interest in an application affecting your neighborhood. During a public hearing, the board or commission may postpone or continue an application's hearing to a later date, or recommend approval or denial of the application. If the board or commission announces a specific date and time for a postponement or continuation that is not later than 60 days from the announcement, no further notice is required. ; A board or commission's decision may be appealed by a person with standing to appeal, or an interested party that is identified as a person who can appeal the decision. The body holding a public hearing on an appeal will determine whether a person has standing to appeal the decision. An interested party is defined as a person who is the applicant or record owner of the subject property, or who communicates an interest to a board or commission by: • • • • • delivering a written statement to the board or commission before the public hearing that generally identifies the issues of concern (// may be delivered to the contact person listed on a notice); or appearing and speaking for the record at the public hearing; and: occupies a primary residence that is within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; is the record owner of property within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development; or is an officer of an environmental or neighborhood organization that has an interest in or whose declared boundaries are within 500 feet of the subject property or proposed development. " ~ ^ ^ ' A notice of appeal must be filed with the director of the responsible department no later than 14 days after the decision. An appeal form may be available from the responsible department. For additional information on the City of Austin's land development process, please visit our website: www, aus t intex …
Play video — original link
Play video
B.1.b - 602 Highland Ave - citizen comments — original pdf
Gaudette, Angela From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Gaudette, Angela Monday, October 26, 2020 4:07 PM Gaudette, Angela FW: Item no. B.1 602 Highland Avenue (HR-2020-125268) View from Downhill of 602 Highland.pdf; View from 6th Street of 602 Highland.pdf > From: Sheila Lyon < Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 11:41 AM To: Papavasiliou, Alexander ‐ BC <bc‐Alexander.Papavasiliou@austintexas.gov>; Myers, Terri ‐ BC <bc‐ Terri.Myers@austintexas.gov>; Valenzuela, Sarah ‐ BC <BC‐Sarah.Valenzuela@austintexas.gov>; Jacob, Mathew ‐ BC <BC‐Mathew.Jacob@austintexas.gov>; McWhorter, Trey ‐ BC <BC‐Trey.McWhorter@austintexas.gov>; Heimsath, Ben ‐ BC <BC‐Ben.Heimsath@austintexas.gov>; Tollett, Blake ‐ BC <bc‐Blake.Tollett@austintexas.gov>; Koch, Kevin ‐ BC <BC‐ Kevin.Koch@austintexas.gov>; Featherston, Witt <BC‐Witt.Featherston@austintexas.gov>; Little, Kelly ‐ BC <BC‐ Kelly.Little@austintexas.gov>; carolinelaverne@gmail.com Cc: Sadowsky, Steve <Steve.Sadowsky@austintexas.gov>; Ted Barnhill Subject: Item no. B.1 602 Highland Avenue (HR‐2020‐125268) *** External Email - Exercise Caution *** October 25, 2020 Subject: Item no. B.1 602 Highland Avenue (HR-2020-125268) Dear HLC Commissioners, The second story addition at 602 Highland Avenue has made revisions for the better based on feedback from the Architectural Review Committee and the Historic Landmark Commission. While the revisions are an improvement, the OWANA Zoning Committee still opposes the second story addition for the following reasons. 1. New additions should be compatible with the historic building by reflecting the scale and massing. (Smoot/Terrace Park design standard requirement) The historic homes in the Smoot/Terrace Park LHD are one or two story homes. Because the basement exemption was given at a little over 1% compliance, Unit 1 at 602 Highland does not have to designate the walkout basement which is largely open to the south and west the first floor. So in fairness the second story rear addition will really be a third story addition. The historic homes in this LHD are either one or two stories. This creates a non-historic precedent and would be the first of its kind. 2. Design new additions that are subordinate to and do not overpower the historic building. (Smoot/Terrace Park design standard requirement) 1 The two perspectives shown at the reviews attempt to strongly suggest the addition will not overpower the original contributing home. This is not the case. Highland Avenue is sloping, so the addition seems highly prominent and intrusive at different perspectives. Recent photos were taken on Highland Avenue and 6th Street to show accurate views of 602 Highland. To give an approximate idea what the proposed addition will look like, drawings of the proposed addition and deck are superimposed on the photo. (See …
Approved Minutes — original pdf
Versión en español a continuación. Historic Landmark Commisison October 26, 2020 Historic Landmark Commission to be held October 26, 2020 with Social Distancing Modifications Public comment will be allowed via telephone; no in-person input will be allowed. All speakers must register in advance (October 25th by noon). All public comment will occur at the beginning of the meeting. To speak remotely at the October 26, 2020 meeting, residents must: Call or email the board liaison at (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon, (the day before the meeting). The information required is the speaker name, item number(s) they wish to speak on, whether they are for/against/neutral, and a telephone number or email address. Once a request to speak has been called in or emailed to the board liaison, residents will receive either an email or phone call providing the telephone number to call on the day of the scheduled meeting. Speakers must call in at least 15 minutes prior to meeting start in order to speak, late callers will not be accepted and will not be able to speak. Speakers will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov by noon the day before the scheduled meeting. This information will be provided to Board and Commission members in advance of the meeting. Residents may watch the meeting here: http://www.austintexas.gov/page/watch-atxn-live Reunión del Historic Landmark Commisison FECHA de la reunion 26 octubre, 2020 La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (25 Octobre antes del mediodía). Todos los comentarios públicos se producirán al comienzo de la reunión. Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los residentes deben: Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta en (512) 974-1264 or preservation@austintexas.gov a más tardar al mediodía (el día antes de la reunión). La información requerida es el nombre del orador, los números de artículo sobre los que desean hablar, si están a favor / en contra / neutrales, y un número de teléfono o dirección de correo electrónico. Una vez que se haya llamado o enviado por correo electrónico una solicitud para hablar al enlace de la junta, los residentes recibirán un correo electrónico o una llamada telefónica …
Agenda — original pdf
Historic Landmark Commission Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Committee October 12, 2020, 3:00 p.m. Version en espanol a continuacion The Architectural Review Committee meeting will be held Monday, October 12, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. with social distancing modifications. THIS MEETING IS LIMITED IN DURATION. PLEASE MAKE PRESENTATIONS AS BRIEF AS POSSIBLE (Consider 7-8 minutes) SO THAT ALL APPLICANTS MAY HAVE THE CHANCE TO PRESENT TO AND RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. Community members will be allowed to listen to the meeting via telephone but do not participate in the meeting. This is a virtual meeting; no in-person input will be allowed. The opportunity for public input will occur at a subsequent meeting of the Historic Landmark Commission. All participants (applicants and others) must register in advance (no later than 12:00 noon on Sunday, October 11, 2020 to be notified of the call-in number and other instructions). To listen to the Architectural Review Committee meeting, community members must: If you have submitted a request, you will receive either an email or phone call on the day • Call or email the board liaison at preservation@austintexas.gov or (512) 974-1264 no later than noon on Sunday, October 11. Provide your name and telephone number or email address. • of the meeting with the telephone number and call-in instructions. Participation in this meeting is limited to applicants and staff. • You must call in at least 15 minutes prior to the meeting start in order to listen (no later than 2:45 p.m.). Late callers will not be accepted. • Applicants will be placed in a queue until their time to speak. • Handouts or other information may be emailed to preservation@austintexas.gov no later than noon on Sunday, October 11. This information will be provided to commissioners in advance of the meeting. Reunión especial del Historic Landmark Commission, Architectural Review Committee FECHA de la reunion: 12 Octubre, 2020 a las tres de la tarde (3:00 p.m.) La junta se llevará con modificaciones de distanciamiento social Se permitirán comentarios públicos por teléfono; no se permitirá ninguna entrada en persona. La oportunidad a hablar en estas causas sera a una reunion regular del Historic Landmark Commission con noticias publicas. Todos los oradores deben registrarse con anticipación (11 Octubre 2020 antes del mediodía). Para hablar de forma remota en la reunión, los residentes deben: • Llame o envíe un correo electrónico al enlace de la junta …
2406 Harris Boulevard application and plans — original pdf
Backup
416 W 12th St - Applicant's presentation — original pdf
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT CLARKSVILLE 12TH STREET SITE WEST END CAPITOL T E E R T S O I N O T N A N A S LADY BIRD LAKE SECOND STREET DISTRICT CENTRAL EAST AUSTIN 1 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 INFORMATION Registered in the National Register of Historical Places for: Example of Postwar Modern Design. Recognition of the significance of Delta Kappa Gamma. Identified as a locally significant structure contributing to the areas of education and architecture. 2 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 VISIONING: COMMEMORATING MODERN DESIGN & DKG 3 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 OPTION 1 | PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN | GROUND LOBBY +524'-0" +529'-0" +532'-0" +525'-0" +527'-0" LOBBY BELOW O.T.B. O.T.B. O.T.B. E TRASH 222 SF O.T.B. LEASING / MGMT 816 SF B.O.H. 750 SF RETAIL / OTHER 3,389 SF " 4 - ' 7 1 +537'-6" TERRACE 560 SF +537'-6" 12th Street i t e e r t S o n o t n A n a S +531'-0" Outdoor Terrace +542'-0" 4 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 OPTION 1B | SOUTH GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION A COMMEMORATIVE SPACE 5 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 OPTION 1B | WEST GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION A COMMEMORATIVE SPACE 6 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 OPTION 2 | RE-USE & REBUILD PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN | GROUND LOBBY +529'-0" +532'-0" +524'-0" +525'-0" +527'-0" LOBBY BELOW MAIL O.T.B. O.T.B. O.T.B. E TRASH 222 SF O.T.B. LEASING / MGMT 816 SF B.O.H. 750 SF RETAIL / OTHER 2,109 SF +537'-6" +537'-6" +537'-6" 12th Street +531'-0" GARDEN i t e e r t S o n o t n A n a S +531'-0" +542'-0" 7 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 OPTION 2 | RE-USE & REBUILD SOUTH GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION A COMMEMORATIVE SPACE 8 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020 OPTION 2 | RE-USE & REBUILD WEST GROUND FLOOR ELEVATION A COMMEMORATIVE SPACE 9 HISTORIC REVIEW | AUSTIN,TX | BLOCK 150 | 2020033 | 10-12-2020